HomeMy WebLinkAbout20262 - RESOLUTIONS - 1/16/2002 RESOLUTION NO. 20262
OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, ,
CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN SO AS TO
REDESIGNATE A 1.13 ACRE PARCEL FROM M15: MEDIUM
DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO RC: RESORT COMMERCIAL, AND A
REQUEST TO AMEND THE ZONING MAP SO AS TO REZONE A
1.13ACRE PARCEL FROM WR2: WATERCOURSE AND LIMITED
MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO WC1: WATERCOURSE AND
RETAIL BUSINESS ZONE. THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT
4601 MATTHEW DRIVE, ZONE W-R-2, SECTION 30.
WHEREAS, Mr. Francisco J. Urrutia, (the"applicant')has filed an application with the City pursuant
to Section 9407.00 of the Zoning Ordinance for a Change of Zone of 1.13 acres of land from WR2
(Water Course and Limited Multifamily Residential) Zone to WC1 (Watercourse and Retail
Business) Zone;
WHEREAS, the applicant has filed Case No. 5.0893 (Amendment to the General Plan) with the
City and paid the required filing fees;
WHEREAS, notice of public hearing of the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Springs to
consider applicants application for Case No. 5.0891 (Change of Zone) and Case No. 5.0893
(General Plan Amendment) was given in accordance with applicable law; and
WHEREAS, on December 12, 2001 a public hearing on the applications for Case Nos. 5.0891 '
(Change of Zone) and 5.0893 (Amendment to the General Plan)was conducted by the Planning
Commission in accordance with applicable law,and the Planning Commission voted to recommend
that the City Council amend both the General Plan and the Zoning Map; and
WHEREAS, notice of public hearing of the City Council of the City of Palm Springs to consider
applicants application for Case No. 5.0891 (Change of Zone)and Case No. 5.0893 (General Plan
Amendment) was given in accordance with applicable law; and
WHEREAS, on January 16, 2002 a public hearing on the applications for Case Nos. 5.0891
(Change of Zone)and 5.0893(Amendment to the General Plan)was conducted by the City Council
in accordance with applicable law; and
WHEREAS, 'in accordance with CEQA, an initial study was prepared and staff found that the
proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has carefully reviewed and considered all of the evidence presented
in connection with the hearing: and
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of its public hearing on January 16, 2001, the City Council
recommended approval of Case Nos. 5.0891 and 5.0893 subject to the findings herein;
THE CITY COUNCIL HEREBY FINDS AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1: Pursuant to CEQA, the City Council finds that the proposed project could not have
a significant effect on the environment.
Section 2: Given the physical characteristics::of the site, the development of the site will more
closely associate with the shopping center located to the east of the site rather than
any residential uses located to the west of the site.
Resolution 20262
Page 2
' Section 3: The amendment to the General Plan will result in the proposed change of zone
being in conformity with the General Plan Map and Report.
Section 4: The subject property is suitable for the uses intended in the General Plan
designation and the uses permitted in the proposed zone, in terms of access, size
of parcel, relationship to similar or related uses, and other considerations deemed
relevant by the Commission.
Section 5: The proposed change of zone and change of General Plan designation is
necessary and proper at this time, and is not likely to be detrimental to the adjacent
property or residents.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that, based upon the foregoing, the City Council hereby
approves Case Nos. 5.0891 (Change of Zone) and 5.0893 (General Plan Amendment)as shown
on Exhibit A.
ADOPTED this 161-b day of January , 2002.
AYES: Members Mills, Oden, Reller—Spurgin and Mayor Kleindienst
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
TE T: CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA
y Clerk City Manager
REVIEWED AND APPROVED AS TO FORM
1dr
Resolution 20262
b Page 3
�I t4 lu
I I _
5.v�N-Y� - DUNEt _ �N
/R I� 1.4 44 �o I
4- 11,11
L4of f I
P
� //tip I/JD Io
I PA O P Ili
Ci
Uzi w
AW
%ar rtK, M• I t4 1• IOL . .. .1.4
LGO AW /x
.�•'� 7 LAKlS�.trR L I R
I L
I 4
t4 \\ « ,O rw� W I M t I 14 MS
0
P
IIt '
o /1! L41
MIS y �rr+�tw.�p�. r,ct Nos/ir` T' /
k• IVl/ir�rt I �1'V
L2 L. //'�//IIIIIIYInl111�� .� MIS ` \��� �� MIS l 4l/tl
Case Number 5.0893
General flan Amendment
Exhibit A ', � I /�J
ltu`ti \ M-I
If w-o
{.l
.. a M-
A.l.c COB[11TIIMN \
LOMA4Ill WA-1-a CCM7C11
p,�5lf
w�rtK
MR1 PAN ■.. ..• v •. an rC.n'4 M-1 /A.tx N. 1,J
PO'
R•1•G �W-R•I•C ..•, . ..w . . I
IQ4 w
EL WICK w
II",
•,WY
.� w I.L. w -
� .1•.L.
L ya•" l
IYL
I t L. • • ` i
1 •
V
ra.
N RMHP R"3 iC q-G_A-Iq)c I.L.
n.o.A.
-2y �•y 1•L q_�
y RMHP 4 �rtAll-
LL• RMHP •'• C^D-
0-20 0-20
I.L.
Case Number 5.0891
Zoning Map Amendment
Exhibit A