HomeMy WebLinkAbout19672 - RESOLUTIONS - 10/20/1999RESOLUTION NO. 19672
OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH
THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE TO FORM A RULE 20A UTILITY
UNDERGROUNDING DISTRICT AT THE INTERSECTION OF
INDIAN AVENUE/GARNET AVENUE AND INTERSTATE 10 IN
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE AND CITY OF PALM SPRINGS AND TO
ESTABLISH RULE 20A BOUNDARY MAP BOUNDARIES. ALL
COSTS TO BE FROM COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE RULE 20A UTILITY
UNDERGROUNDING FUNDS AND FROM DEVELOPER
CONTRIBUTIONS, ALSO MINOR ADMINISTRATIVE CITY COSTS
.ALLOCATED FOR THE INDIAN AVENUE/GARNET AVENUE RULE
20A UTILITY UNDERGROUNDING DISTRICT.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Palm Springs does hereby:
Approve Cooperative Agreement with the County of Riverside to form a Rule 20A Utility
Undergrounding District at the intersection of Indian Avenue/Garnet Avenue and Interstate 10 in
County of Riverside and City of Palm Springs; and
2. Establish City District within County of Riverside Rule 20 A Underground District boundary map
(indicated on Attachment "A"); and
That all costs to be from County of Riverside Rule 20A Utility Undergrounding Funds and also from
developer contributions and minor administrative City costs as indicated on Estimate of Project
Costs, (Attachment "B").
ADOPTED this 20th day of October 1999.
AYES: Members
NOES: None
ABSENT: Member
Barnes, Hodges, Reller-Spurgin and Mayor Kleindienst
Oden
A"LT SESE T: —,,,
By\ �r ice! C�T'�G�
City Clerk
REVIEWED & APPROVED AS TO FORM
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Cooperative Agreement
2. Boundary Map (Attachment "A")
3. Estimate of Project Costs (Attachment "B")
1
F�
Cooperative Agreement
Rule 20-A Underground Utility District Project
ATTACHMENT"B
Estimate of Project Costs
Rule 20-A Underground Utility District Project
Indian Avenue and Garnet Avenue
Palm Springs / Garnet area
Design, Construction and Inspection
$2,157,500
Source of Funds:
CPUC Rule 20-A
1,995,000
City / Developer agreement (NW)
100,000
City / Developer agreement (SE)
62,500
Total:
2,157,500
CITY Administrative costs
$ 10,000
Source of Funds: City funds
COUNTY Administrative costs $ 10,000
Source of Funds: County funds
Total Estimated Project costs: $2,177 500
sd
W
�63
1