HomeMy WebLinkAbout19367 - RESOLUTIONS - 10/7/1998RESOLUTION NO. 19367
OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM
SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING, SUBJECT TO
THE CONDITIONS STATED, CASE NO. 5.0626-PD-
' 226/TTM 27674, TO GOLDRICH AND KEST FOR A
REVISED PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT TO
AMEND THE ORIGINAL CONDITIONS OF
APPROVAL FOR AN 148-UNIT CONDOMINIUM
PROJECT (SANDSTONE VILLAS CONDOMINIUMS)
ON 7.03 ACRES LOCATED AT 1900-1950 SOUTH
PALM CANYON DRIVE, R-2 ZONE, SECTION 26.
WHEREAS, Goldrich and Kest Industries, (the "applicant") has filed an application
with the City pursuant to Section 9403.00 of the Zoning Ordinance for a Revised
Planned Development District (PD) for the purpose of amending the original conditions
of approval adopted by the City Council on February 17, 1993 for an existing 148-unit
condominium project (Sandstone Villas Condominiums) at 1900-1950 South Palm
Canyon Drive, R-2 Zone, Section 26; and
WHEREAS, notice of public hearing of the Planning Commission of the City of Palm
Springs to consider Applicant's application for a Revised PD for Case No. 5.0626-PD
226/TTM 27674 was given in accordance with applicable law; and
WHEREAS, on August 26, 1998, a public hearing on the application for the Revised
PD for Case No. 5.0626-PD-226/TTM 27674 was held by the Planning Commission
in accordance with applicable law; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission voted to recommend approval (4-1, one absent,
one abstention) of the revised PD to amend condition of approval no. 14, as contained
in Resolution No. 4600; and
WHEREAS, notice of public hearing of the City Council of the City of Palm Springs to
consider applicant's application for the Revised PD for Case No. 5.0626-PD-226/TTM
27674 to amend an original condition of approval was given in accordance with
applicable law; and
WHEREAS, the proposed Revised PD is considered exempt from the provisions of the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) per Section 15301 (Existing Structures);
and
WHEREAS, on Oxtober 7, 1998, a public hearing on the application for the Revised
PD for Case No. 5.0626-PD-226/TTM 27674 was held by the City Council in
' accordance with applicable law; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has carefully reviewed and considered all of the evidence
presented in connection with the hearing on the project, including, but not limited to
the staff report, and all written and oral testimony presented.
R19367
Page 2
I c
THE CITY COUNCIL HEREBY FINDS AS FOLLOWS:
Section 17 Pursuant to CEQA, the City Council finds as follows:
With the mitigation measures identified in the Negative Declaration
adopted at the time of the condominium conversion, all potential
significant environmental impacts will be mitigated to a point where
clearly no significant environmental effects will as a result of the project.
The mitigation measures adopted were originally identified as conditions
of approval.
Section 2: The City Council further finds that the revisions to the original
conditions of approval for Case No. 5.0626-PD-226 is appropriate for
consideration ,given the General Plan's Housing Element Goals and
Objectives for providing affordable housing within the community and is
adequate to achieve said goals and objectives.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that, based upon the foregoing, the City
Council hereby approves the revised PD to amend the original conditions of approval
for Case No. 5.0626-PD-226/TTM 27674 as set forth in Exhibit A, (with revised
Condition No. 14 as highlighted in bold) on file in the Office of the Ciry Clerk,
which are to be satisfied as specified.
ADOPTED this 7thday of Oct, 1998
AYES: Members Barnes, Oden, Reller-Spurgin and Mayor Kleindienst
NOES: Member Hodges
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST: CITY QF- ALM SPRIN6CALIFORNIA
City Clerk City Manager v
REVIEWED & APPROVED i
1