HomeMy WebLinkAbout18885 - RESOLUTIONS - 9/4/1996 RESOLUTION NO. 18885
OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM
SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE REVISED
PRELIMINARY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
APPLICATION (CASE 5 . 0522A-PD-2205) SUBMITTED
BY THE CASTILLO COMPANY, INC. FOR AMERICAN
' STORES PROPERTIES, INC. FOR A SAV-ON DRUG
STORE COMMERCIAL CENTER, COMPRISED OF THREE
BUILDINGS TOTALING 25 , 353 SQUARE FEET ON A 3 . 8
ACRE SITE, INCLUDING A FAST-FOOD DRIVE-THROUGH
RESTAURANT AND A DRIVE-THROUGH PHARMACY,
LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SUNRISE WAY
AND TAHQUITZ CANYON WAY, C-1-AA, R-4-VP AND
RESORT. OVERLAY ZONES, SECTION 14 .
WHEREAS, the Castillo Company for American Stores Properties, Inc .
(the applicants) has submitted a revised preliminary Planned
Development District (PD) application for a 25, 353 square foot
commercial retail center, including Sav-On Drug Store as the anchor
tenant and a phased construction plan; and
WHEREAS, the proposed project description includes the future
vacation of a portion of Andreas Road only along the subject
property frontage reducing the right-of-way width to that of a
collector street as so designated on the General Plan Land Use and
Circulation Map; and
WHEREAS, the original PD application for the subject site, approved
by the City Council in 1989, was for a 44, 903 square foot
commercial center, and in 1992 the PD application was revised and
approved by the City Council as a 42, 000 square foot commercial
center; and
WHEREAS, in 1989, an environmental assessment was prepared for the
project and a Negative Declaration was filed in accordance with
City and state laws by the City Council; and
WHEREAS, the proposed project includes similar uses to those
included in but less square footage than the previously approved
projects and is adequately addressed in the completed environmental
assessment and Negative Declaration; and
WHEREAS, the subject PD application was brought before the Planning
Commission at two regularly scheduled study sessions, on March 20,
1996, and on April 17, 1996 ; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a. public hearing on July 24,
1996, and voted to recommend approval of the subject PD (5-1; 1
absent) ; and
WHEREAS, notice of a public hearing of the City Council of the City
of Palm Springs to consider the subject application for a revised
preliminary Planned Development District was given in accordance
with applicable law; and
' WHEREAS, the City Council has carefully reviewed and considered all
of the evidence presented in connection with the hearing on the
project, including but not limited to the staff report .
THE CITY COUNCIL HEREBY FINDS AS FOLLOWS : 3
Section 1 : Pursuant to CEQA, the City Council finds as
follows :
R18885
Page 2 31)
An Environmental Assessment was previously prepared for the
original PD application, and a Negative Declaration was filed
in accordance with state and local law by the City Council in
1989 . The subject PD application, which includes less than
one half the square footage originally approved for the same
subject site, and includes the same or very similar uses, is
adequately covered by the original Environmental Assessment
which was prepared pursuant to CEQA, for which a Negative '
Declaration was filed.
Section 2 : Pursuant to Section 9403 . 00 of the Zoning Ordinance
the City Council finds that :
a. That the use applied for at the location set 'Eorth in the
application, is properly one for which a Planned Development
District is authorized by the City' s Zoning Ordinance .
The proposed retail commercial center will allow for a mix of
commercial uses, including one drive-through restaurant, a
Sav-On Drug Store which includes a drive:-through pharmacy
which will not provide the required minimum car stacking space
required by the Zoning ordinance and a general commercial
building, is permitted pursuant to a Planned Development
District .
b. That the said use is necessary or desirable for the
development of the community, is in harmony with the: various
elements or objectives of the General 'Plan, and, is not
detrimental to existing uses or to future uses specifically
permitted in the zones in which the proposed use is to be
located.
The proposed revised PD application for a commercial center '
will provide commercial retail, restaurant and general
services to both the neighboring residents and visitors to the
community which are objectives of the General Plan as well as
the zones in which the site is located (i . e . the site is
designated Resort Commercial, High Density Residential and
Neighborhood Convenience Center pursuant to the General Plan
and zoned C-1AA and R-4-VP with a Resort Overlay zone) . The
commercial center proposal will provide resident and tourist
conveniences such that the location is within the City' s
Tourist Corridor along Tahquitz Canyon Way, yet is also in
proximity to a number of low and medium density residential
areas. The subject project incorporates upgraded
architectural styles and landscaping in order to blend in
aesthetically with both the resort commercial areas and the
residential areas . Additionally, a landscaped median island
will be provided on Sunrise Way which will provide safety and
aesthetic benefits and is consistent with policies of the
General Plan.
C . That the site for the intended use is adequate in size and
shape to accommodate said use, including yards, setbacks,
walls or fences, :Landscaping and other features required in
order to adjust said use to those existing or permitted future
uses of land in the neighborhood . ,
The proposed project includes three commercial buildings,
totaling 25, 353 square feet . The anchor tenant, Sav-On Drug
Store includes a drive-through pharmacy anc.t one of the future
building sites is :intended for a fast-food drive-through. The
proposed project complies with property development standards
except that the drive-through pharmacy does not include the
stacking space for the required number of cars pursuant to the
Zoning Ordinance . However, it is determined that this type of
drive-through will not require as much stacking space for cars
R18885
Page 3
such that the pharmacy use functions differently from other
typical drive-through uses such as fast-food restaurants . .
d. That the site for the proposed use relates to streets and
highways properly designed and improved to carry the type and
quantity of traffic to be generated by _the proposed use.
' The proposed commercial center is bordered on three sides by
roadways, two of which are major thoroughfares and one of
which is a collector. roadway. The roadways which are
surrounding the subject commercially zoned site, are designed
to accommodate the traffic generated. Additionally, the
General Plan designates Andreas Road as a collector street,
requiring a 60 foot public right-of-way to accommodate 40 feet
of roadway pavement and 10 foot sidewalk/parkways on each side
of the street . Currently, the right-of-way is greater than 60
feet and the project includes a request for a partial street
vacation of Andreas Road (fronting the subject property) , such
that it is consistent with the collector street designation.
The north side of Andreas Road is fully developed with curb
and gutter and an eight foot sidewalk. With the proposed
street vacation, the intent of the General Plan will me met
since the required 40 feet of roadway pavement will be
provided along with the required 10 foot sidewalk/parkway on
the south side of Andreas Road adjacent to the subject
project .
e. That the conditions to be imposed and shown on the approved
site plan or in Exhibit A of this resolution are deemed
necessary to protect the public health, safety and general
welfare and may include minor modifications of the zone' s
property development standards . The proposed conditions will
ensure that the proposed project will not compromise the
public health, safety and general welfare and that the
property will be aesthetically enhanced. Some of the
conditions which ensure these important elements include the
improvement of Sunrise Way and Andreas Road, the installation
of a raised landscaped median island to encourage safer on-
street turning movements, and the requirement to underground
on-site utility lines .
f . A nexus and rough proportionality have been established for
the requirement of the future off-site improvements as related
to the Planned Development District .
The conditions requiring off-site improvements and utility
undergrounding which are required by City ordinances are
related to the proper functioning of the project in the
proposed location. Conditions of approval require the
dedication of right-of-way along Sunrise Way, the installation
of a raised median island on Sunrise Way, the installation of
a street light, the installation of other improvements such as
curbs, gutters and sidewalks and the undergrounding of
utilities, the majority of which are located on the subject
site . All of the required roadway, sidewalk and utility line
improvements will provide direct and immediate safety benefits
' to the patrons of the proposed project and the requirements
will provide for an aesthetically pleasing site for its users
to enjoy. The required improvements are in rights-of-way
immediately adjacent to the site, which must be utilized by
those accessing the subject site. Without the proposed
project, which will provide for 25, 353 square feet of
commercial uses, generating additional traffic and site users, s
these improvements would not be warranted since the site is D r;
currently vacant and not currently impacting any City rights-
of-way.
R18885 ..3J.a (
Page 4 ''
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that, based upon the foregoing, the
City Council hereby approves revised preliminary Planned
Development District 205, Case No. 5 . 0522A, subject to those
conditions set forth in the attached Exhibit A (as on file in the
office of the City Clerk) , which are to be satisfied prior to the
issuance of certificates of occupancy unless otherwise specified.
ADOPTED this 4th _ __day of September , 1996 . ,
AYES : Members Barnes, Hodges, Oden and Mayor Kleindienst
NOES : Member Spurgin
ABSENT: None
ATTEST: CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA
21
City Clerk City Manag r
REVIEWED BY:
1
1