Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout18054 - RESOLUTIONS - 3/3/1993 RESOLUTION NO. 18054 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA, OVERRULING THE PLANNING COMMISSION DENIAL OF CASE 3 . 1154 FOR A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 3035 GOLDENROD LT1NE, R-1-B GONE, SECTION 35. WHEREAS the City Council has received a timely written appeal by Myrna oakman requesting that the Council overrule the Planning Commission decision to deny Case 3 .1154 for the construction of a single-family residence at 3035 Goldenrod Lane; and WHEREAS the Planning Commission considered the application at a duly noticed meeting held on February 10, 1993; and WHEREAS the Planning Commission recommended denial on the basis that the proposal would be inconsistent with the existing Specific Plan (1) , Resolution No. 4233 ; and WHEREAS the City Council finds that the City's Zoning Map shows the property zoned as R-1-B and single family residential is consistent with such zoning; and WHEREAS the subject property and the application comply with all required property development standards of the R-1-B district; and WHEREAS the City Council finds that the proposal is consistent with the proposed General Plan designation for M-15 (Medium-Density Residential) land uses; and ' WHEREAS the City Council imposed a moratorium from June 20, 1990, to April 20, 1992, to allow adequate opportunity for the consideration and approval of Specific Plan #1 for Canyon Park Resort & Spa and finds that the moratorium is no longer in effect; and WHEREAS upon the expiration of the moratorium, on or about July 24, 1992, the City informed the owners of subject property and property in the vicinity of the subject property that the City was in negotiations with Canyon Development, but that since the moratorium had expired and the negotiations were of unknown duration, the City would process all development applications and issue permits in conformity with the then existing R-1-B zoning; and WHEREAS the application for architec:tdural review pursuant to Section 9404.00-D requires review of specific aspects of design to determine whether the residence will provide a desirable environment for its occupants, will be compatible with the character of adjacent and surrounding developments, and whether aesthetically it is of good composition, materials, textures, and colors. WHEREAS Canyon Development, despite having had several years to do so, has declined to acquire the property for the purposes contemplated by the Specific Plan and the City Council believes it is appropriate to afford the lot owners the fundamental right to develop their property, and that the appropriate development for the lots as they now exist is the current R-1-B zoning. Resolution No. 18054 �. Page 2 NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED after due consideration of all evidence provided, including plans and all other written and oral testimony, the City Council finds as follows: 1. The site layout, orientation, and location of structures takes effective advantage of the topography and is appropriate in relationship to the future development potential of the adjacent lots which are currently vacant. 2. As adjacent lots are vacant, the approval of these plans will not adversely affect adjacent property by creating excessive variety or monotonous regularity. 3. Height, area, setbacks, and overall mass are consistent with other architectural approvals in the R-1-B Zone. 4. Building design, materials, and colors will be sympathetic with desert surroundings. 5. Materials, colors, and configuration of all elements of the building which are visible simultaneously :including overhangs, roofs, and substructures will be harmonious. 6. Composition and treatment of the buildings, textures, and materials will be consistent. 7. All plantings will be located with consideration of desert climate. Plantings will be properly irrigated for maintenance. 8. All lighting will be appropriate and not adversely affect adjacent property. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, based upon the foregoing findings, the City Council determines as follows: 1. The issue is of architectural review and whether pursuant to Section 9404. 00-D, the proposed residence will provide a desirable environment, will be compatible with surrounding development, and is of good composition, materials, textures, and colors. 2 . That based upon findings 1-8 above, the Council concludes that the project satisfies the requirements of Section 9404. 00-D and is consistent with the: standards of the City generally required for architectural review. 3 . That the proposed residence will be consistent with all development standards of the existing R-1-B zoning existing on the property pursuant to the Palm. Springs Zoning Map. Resolution No. 18054 Page 3 4. That the Planning Commission failed to address the criteria for architectural review and the decision of the Planning Commission should be reversed and the appeal BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that based upon the foregoing, Case 3.1154, and the plans therfore now on file with the City, being a request for architectural review for construction of a single family residence at 3035 Goldenrod Lane in accordance with the R-1-B zoning, is hereby approved subject to the applicant's satisfaction of all conditions outlined in Attachment "A" which conditions shall be satisfied prior to occupancy unless otherwise provided therein. ADOPTED this 3rd day of March , 1993 . AYES: Members Hodges, Lyons, Reller-Spurgin, Schlendorf and Mayor Maryanov NOES: None ABSENT: None ATTEST: CITY OF LIFORNIA Bye \ -- L City Clerk (;\ f� City Man ger REVIEWED & APPROVED `L)!2o y ii ®6 3 R18054 ATTACHMENT 'A' Page 4 DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE CONDITIONS February 4, 1993 STAFF MEMBERS: Enginea:rcing Division. R. Rockett, D. Pearson, M. VanHorn Fire Department: D. Brown Planning Department: D. Evans, R. Patenaude, D. Goodwin, D. Forcucci, R. Balderas* * Case Planner CASE 3.1154 - APPLICATION BY MYRNA CARMAN FOR A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 3035 GOLDEN ROD LANE, SECTION 35, T 4 S, R 4 E, S.B.B.M. , CASE NO. 3.1.154, ENG. FILE NO. E-IL966 (SFR) ENGINEERING DIVISION: The Engineering Division recommends that if this application is approved, such approval is subject to the following conditions being completed in compliance with City standards and ordinances: Before final acceptance of the 'project, all conditions listed below shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. GOLDEN ROD LANE 1. Any improvements within the street right-of--way require a City of Palm Springs Encroachment Permit. 2. The existing curb, gutter, and sidewalk shall remain in place except for curb cuts necessary for driveway approaches. ' J . All broken or off grade CURB, GUTTER, AC PAVEMENT, SIDEWALK shall be repaired or replaced. 4. All driveway approaches shall be constructed in accordance with City of Palm Springs Standard Drawing No. 201 and have minimum widths of 10 feet„ ON-SITE 5. Connect all sanitary facilities to the City sewer system. GENERAL 6. The pad elevation shall be within 6" of that shown on the approved Grading Plan for Tract No. 16149 which is on file in the Engineering Division, City of Palm Springs unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of a grading permit. 1 R18054 Page 5 7. The area in which this project is situated is indicative of desert soil conditions found in many areas of Palm Springs. The Engineering Division does not require a soils report. This does not mean that subterranean conditions unknown at this time may not affect any building done on this site. a3. any utility cuts in the existing pavement made by this development shall receive trench replacement pavement to match existing pavement plus 1 additional inch. Pavement shall be restored to a smooth rideable surface. 9. All proposed utility lines on/or adjacent to this project shall be underground prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 10. The developer shall accept all flows impinging upon his land and conduct these flows to an approved drainage structure. Predevelopment Q shall not be exceeded. TRAFFIC 11. The developer shall replace all damaged or destroyed pavement legends and striping and provide any new striping that is required by the City Engineer on the GOLDEN ROD LANE frontage prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 12 . Construction signing, lighting and barricading shall be provided for on all projects as required by City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. As a minimum, all construction signing, lighting and barricading shall be in accordance with State of California, Department of Transportation, "MANUAL OF TRAFFIC CONTROLS FOR CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE WORK ZONES" dated 1991, or subsequent additions in force at the time of construction. 13. This property is subject to the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee based on the SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ITE Code B land use. PLANNING DEPARTMENT: 14. The proposed development of the premises shall conform to all applicable regulations of the Palm Springs Zoning Ordinance, Municipal Code, or any other City Codes, ordinances and resolutions which supplement the zoning district regulations. 15. Final landscaping, irrigation, exterior lighting, and fencing plans shall be submitted for approval by the Department of Planning and Zoning prior to issuance of a building permit. Landscape plans shall be approved by the Riverside County Agricultural Commissioner's Office prior to submittal. ry R18054 Page 6 16. Pursuant to Fish anti Game Code Section 711.4 a filing fee of $25.00 is required. This project has a de minus impact on fish and wildlife, and a Certificate of Fee Exemption shall be completed by the City and two copies filed with the County Clerk. This application shall not be final until such fee is paid and the Certificatte of Fee Exemption i.0 fil.e:elo Fee :;ha,.', . in the form of a money order or cashier' s check payable to Riverside County. 17. The street address numbering/lettering shall not: exceed eight inches in height. 18. Manufacturer's cut sheets of all, exterior lighting on the building, in the landscaping, and in the parking lot shall be submitted for approval prior to issuance of a building permit. 19. Drainage swales shall be provided adjacent: to all curbs and sidewalks - 31 wide and 611 deep. The irrigation system shall be field tested prior to final approval of the project. Section 14. 24.020 of the Municipal Code prohibits nuisance water from entering the public streets, roadways or gutters. 20. The design, height, texture and color of fences and walls shall be submitted for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. FIRE DEPARTMENT: 21. Smoke detectors and construction per the U13C. 22. Security fencing shall be required during combustible construction. 23 . Garden hoses shall be required with adjustable spray, nozzles for construction fire protection. 24. This project is beyond the 5 minute response time from the closest fire station ,and therefore .requires a residential fire sprinkler system. Installation per NFPA #13d and local code. Submit plans and water calculations from a licensed fire sprinkler contractor prior to issuance of building permit. APPROVALS: 25. Unless otherwise specified, any approval of city :required hereunder shall be granted by the Director of Planning or his designee.