HomeMy WebLinkAbout18033 - RESOLUTIONS - 2/3/1993 RESOLUTION NO. 18033
OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM
SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING, SUBJECT TO THE
CONDITIONS STATED, CONDITIONAL USE P:E;RMIT NO.
5.0598 TO THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, FOR THE
EXPANSION OF THE EXISTING MUNICIPAL GOLF
�p92;:�u, E7, 6'S�u�g=C, ae5 �'Ok1E , uTGC°1"YO➢YS" 1� Y11i D
20
WHEREAS, the City of Palm Springs, (the "Applicant") has filed an
application pursuant to Section 9402.00 of the Zoning Code for a
Conditional Use Permit for an expansion of the existing Municipal
Golf Course (the "Project") Located in the Tahquitz Wash from the
existing course off Golf Club Drive to E1 Cielo Road, W, W-R-1-C,
0-5 Zones, Sections 19 and 20; and
WHEREAS, notice of a public hearing of the Planning Commission of
the City of Palm Springs to consider Applicant's application for
Conditional Use Permit 5.0598 was given in accordance with
applicable law; and,
WHEREAS, on January 13, 1993 a public hearing on the application
for Conditional Use Permit No. 5.0598 was held by the Planning
Commission in accordance with applicable law; and
WHEREAS, the proposed Conditional Permit No. 5. 0598 is considered
a "project" pursuant to the teams of the California Environmental
Quality Act ("CEQA") ; and a Negative Declaration has been prepared
for this project and has been distributed for public review and
comment in accordance with CEQA; and
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of its public hearing January 1.3, 1993,
the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 4223, recommending
that the City Council approve Conditional Use Permit No. 5. 0598
subject to the findings .and conditions stated in Resolution No.
4223; and
WHEREAS, notice of a public hearing of the City Council of the City
of Palm Springs to consider Conditional Use Permit No. 5.0598 was
given in accordance with applicable law; and
WHEREAS, on February 3, 1993, a public hearing on the application
for Conditional Use Permit No. 5.0598 was held by the City Council
in accordance with applicable law; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has carefully reviewed and considered all
of the evidence presented in connection with the hearincl on the
Project, including but not limited to the staff report, all
environmental data including the initial study, the ;proposed
Negative Declaration and all written and oral testimony presented.
THE CITY. COUNCIL :HEREBY FINDS AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1: Pursuant to CEQA, the City Council finds as
follows:
a. The final Negative Declaration has been completed in
compliance with CEQA, the State CEQA Guidelines, and the
City's CEQA procedures contained in the City's CEQA
Guidelines. The City Council has independently reviewed and
considered the information contained In the Negative
Declaration and finds that it adequately discusses the
significant environmental effects of the proposed Project, and
that, on the basis of the initial study and comments received
during the public review process, there is no substantial
evidence that there will be any significant adverse
environmental effects as a result of the approval of this A-C
Project because mitigation measures identified in the Negative
Res 18033
Declaration have been incorporated into the Project which
mitigate any potential significant environmental effects to a
point where clearly no significant environmental effects will
occur as a result of the Project. The mitigation measures
adopted are identified as conditions of approval. The City
Council further finds that the Negative Declaration reflects
its independent judgement.
Section 2 : A mitigation monitoring program has been adopted
pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21081.6
in order to assure compliance with the above-
referenced mitigation measures during Project
implementation. These mitigation monitoring
measures are included as conditions of Project
approval.
Section 3: Pursuant to Zoning Ordinance 9402. 00, the City
Council finds that:
a. The use applied for at the location set forth in the
application is properly one for which a conditional use permit
is authorized by the City's Zoning Ordinance.
b. The use applied for is necessary or desirable for the
development of the community, is in harmony with the various
elements or objectives of the General Plan, and is not
detrimental to existing uses or to future uses specifically
permitted in the zone in which the proposed use is to be
located.
C. The site for the intended use is adequate in size and shape to
accommodate said use, including yards, setbacks, walls or
fences, landscaping and other features required in order to
adjust said use to those existing or permitted future uses of
the land in the neighborhood.
d. The site for the proposed use relates to streets and highways
properly designed and improved to carry the type and quantity
of traffic to be generated by the proposed use.
G. The conditions to be imposed and shown on the approved site
plan are deemed necessary to protect the public health, safety
and general welfare, including any minor modifications of the
zone's property development standards.
f. That the Project is consistent with the existing General Plan
land use plan and policies.
g. That the project is consistent with the proposed draft General
Plan text on file with the State of California Office of
Planning and Research (OPR) and there is a reasonable
probability that it will be consistent with the revised
general plan when adopted in that the project is consistent
with the overall density and land use character of the General
Plan which allows for recreational uses in this area.
h. That the City has worked with the Sierra Club and Friends of
the Indian Canyon on exploring project alternatives.
Y
Res. 18033
Pg 3
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that, based on the
foregoing, the City Council hereby approves Conditional use Permit
No. 5. 0598 subject to those conditions set forth in Exhibit A on
file in the City Clerk's office, which are to be satisfied! prior to
the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy unless otherwise
�1 `�ified• Unless otherwise designated, any approval of the City
shall be by the Director of Planning and Zoning or his designee.
ADOPTED THIS 3rd day, of_February 1993.
AYES: Members Hodges, Lyons, Reller-Spurgin, Schlendorf & Mayor Maryanov
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ATTEST: CIY O LM SIN CALIFORNIA
gy
!City Clerk �— y anag r
REVIEWED & APPROVED o�
0 -C:3
F
VICINITY MAP
RAMON ROAD
O� MES ITE AVE
� U j
PROJECT Lu
LOCATION
Hi�ywAy w
rby
PROPOSED
GOLF COURSE
EXPANSION
CITY OF PALM SPRINGS
CASE NO. 5.0598-CUP - AMENDED IDESCRIPTION CUP for 18-hole expansion
APPLICANT City of Palm Springs of Municipal Golf Course, Sections 19 & 20
e