HomeMy WebLinkAbout17608 - RESOLUTIONS - 7/31/1991 li l3c7\1 %�.
RESOLUTION NO. 17608
OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM
y SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING CERTAIN
OF ITS MEMBERS TO FILE WRITTEN ARGUMENTS
REGARDING A CITY BALLOT MEASURE
WHEREAS, a Special Consolidated Municipal Election is to be
held in the City of Palm Springs, California, on November 5,
1991, at which there will be submitted to the qualified
electors of said City, the following measure:
Shall an ordinance, which creates a new
special Tourism Paid Advertising Fund to
exclusively fund paid advertising to
promote the City as a tourist and visitor
destination, and which shifts to the new
Tourism Paid Advertising Fund from the
City's General Fund the one percent (1%)
transient occupancy taxes collected by
the City pursuant to Municipal Code
Section 3 . 24 . 036, be adopted?
[ ] Yes
[ ] No
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Palm Springs, as follows:
Section 1. The City Council, being the legislative body
of said City, hereby authorizes Tuck Broich
and Chuck Murawski, members of said body, to
file written arguments in favor of the City
measure set forth in the recitals hereof in
accordance with Article 1, Chapter 3 , Division
5 of the Elections Code of the State of
California, and to change said arguments until
and including the date fixed by the City Clerk
after which no arguments for or against said
City measure may be submitted to the City
Clerk.
Section 2 . The City Council, being the legislative body
of said City, hereby authorizes Sonny Bono and
Earl Neel, members of said body, to file
written arguments in opposition to the City
measure set forth in the recitals hereof in
accordance with Article 1, Chapter 3 , Division
5 of the Elections Code of the State of
California, and to change said arguments until
and including the date fixed by the City Clerk
after which no arguments for or against said
City measure may be submitted to the City
Clerk.
Section 3 . The above members of said body are hereby
authorized in accordance with all of the
requirements of Sections 4015. 5 and 5014 .5 of
the Elections Code of the State of California,
to file rebuttal arguments not exceeding 250
words, which rebuttal arguments shall be filed
with the City Clerk not more than ten (10)
R 1/608
Page 2
days after the final date for filing direct
arguments. Rebuttal arguments shall be
printed in the same manner as the direct
arguments. Each rebuttal argument shall be
printed in the same manner as the direct
arguments and shall immediately follow the
direct argument which it seeks to rebut.
Section 4 . The provisions of Section 3 hereof shall apply
at the municipal election to be: held in the
city on November 5, 1991, and shall then be
repealed.
Section 5. In accordance with Section 3016 of the
Elections Code of the State of California, if
more than one argument for or against the City �
measure set forth above is submitted to the
City Clerk: within the time prescribed, the
City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed
to select one of the arguments in favor and
one of the arguments against the measure for
printing and distribution to the voters. In
selecting the argument the City Clerk shall '
give preference and priority in the order
named to the argument of the following: (a)
the legislative body, or member or members of
the legislative body authorized by that body;
(b) the individual voter or bona fide
association of citizens, or combination of
voters and associations, who are the bona fide
sponsors or proponents of the measure; (c)
bona fide association of citizens; and (d)
individual voters who are eligible to vote on
the measure.
ADOPTED this 31st day of July , 1991.
AYES: Councilmembers Broich, Hod(es, Murawski , Neel and Mayor Bono
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ATTEST: CITY )F PALM SPR S C:ALIFORNIA
BY: _' ( By:
City Clerk C:it nag
REVIEWED AND APPROVED: u `?-- -
8/394/014084-0002/003 `1