HomeMy WebLinkAbout17565 - RESOLUTIONS - 7/3/1991 RESOLUTION NO. 17565
OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CASE 5.0560-PD-213/TTM 26578
f (REVISED) , 348 UNIT SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
SUBDIVISION ON GATEWAY DRIVE BETWEEN HIGHWAY III
AND DESERT HIGHLAND ESTATES, R-I-C ZONE, SECTION
34.
WHEREAS the City has received an application by Michael Christian for
a Planned Development District for 348 single family residences located
on Gateway Drive between Highway III and Desert Highland Estates (the
Project); and
WHEREAS the Planning Commission considered the Project at a duly noticed
public hearing held on June 12, 1991; and
WHEREAS the Planning Commission recommended approval with conditions as
outlined in its Resolution No. 4139; and
WHEREAS the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing on July 3,
" 1991, on said project; and
WHEREAS the City Council has reviewed all evidence provided at the hearing
including the staff report dated July 3, 1991, and all other written and
oral testimony, and find the Project, subject to the conditions contained
herein consistent with the requirements of the ordinances of the City
and with State law.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Palm
Springs, California, after considering the evidence provided at the hearing
does hereby approve the Preliminary Planned Development District for
property hereinabove described in accordance with the following findings
and subject to the following conditions:
SECTION 1. The City Council finds:
FINDINGS:
1. That a Planned Development District and Tentative Tract Map
are the appropriate applications for this subdivision including
r a density bonus over Zoning Ordinance allowance.
l 2. That the 5,500 square foot lots being smaller in size and
dimension than any residential lots specified in the Zoning
Ordinance require unique development standards that need to
be reviewed and approved concurrent with approval of the
a preliminary planned development district and tentative tract
map.
3. That the pre-existing subdivision pattern includes streets
which are extended to the boundaries of the subject property
and since the proposed development pattern would not extend
those streets a resolution of those streets, e.g. , extension
into the subject property, cul-de-saccing on the subject
` property, or elimination altogether, is necessary at the time
of plan approval .
�r
Res. No. 17565 -
Page 2
4. That the proposed project is consistent with the maximum
allowable density range of up to 544 units under the General
Plan.
5. That an environmental assessment/initial study has been prepared
which identifies a severe wind erosion impact and recommends
mitigation thorough a windbreak plan which will reduce anticipated
impacts to an acceptable level .
6. That a density bonus is being requested and as such certain
untis shall be subject to affordability restrictions, including
an initial sales price affordable to moderate income families
and re-sale restrictions to insure long term affordability,
which restrictions shall be subject to approval by the City
Attorney.
SECTION 2. The Project is approved subject to the following conditions;
all of which are to be satisfied prior to issuance of
certificate of occupancy unless otherwise specified: '
CONDITIONS:
1. That the Development Committee conditions dated June 12, 1991, h
as amended, shall be met.
2. That Video Road be reconfigured as shown on amended Plan #6A
on file in the Planning Division.
3. That the developer, with the consent of the adjoining property
owner, shall initiate proceedings to vacate the existing
right-of-ways of Lawrence Circle, Howard Circle, Alberto Circle, ;
Pamela and Jiminez Circle.. The developer shall be required
to install all street improvements as deemed necessary by the '
City Engineer and incur all other costs related to the vacating
of the stub streets.
4. That property development standards constituting specific zoning
standards for this development are approved by the Planning
Commission and City Council as part of the preliminary planned '
development district and tentative tract map.
5. That the proposed development of the premises conform to all
applicable regulations of the Palm Springs Zoning Ordinance, Y
Municipal Code, or any other City codes, ordinances, and
resolutions which supplement the zoning district regulations.
6. That the final development plans be submitted in accordance
with Section 9403.00 of the Zoning Ordinances. Final development
plans shall include site plans-, building elevations, floor
plans, roof plans, grading plans, landscape plans (to include
the windbreak plan) , irrigation plans, exterior lighting plans,
sign program, mitigation monitoring program, site cross sections,
property development standards, and other such documents as
required by the Planning Commission. Final development plans
shall be submitted within two (2) years of City Council approval
of the preliminary planned development district.
7. That the developer submit with final development plans a
windbreak and street tree plan to mitigate the effects; of the
wind. As each phase of the project is developed, the City of
Palm Springs will vacate its windbreak easement, and the
developer will remove the existing windbreak.
ti
1
r Res. No. 17565
Page 3
8. At least 25% of the homes located on lots of 6,000 square feet
or less shall be affordable to households earning 120% of median
income or less, as determined by the Housing Division of the
r Economic Development Department. Affordable units shall be
sold only to qualified households, shall be identical to other
units in the project, shall be distributed throughout the
project, and shall have City long term affordability restrictions
in a form approved by City Attorney recorded before close of
escrow.
9. That lots approved for two story structures be clearly identified
on the approved siting plan for each phase.
10. That second story additions shall not be allowed to any
single-story residence. This condition shall be recorded on
r
each deed.
11. That expansion or alteration to approved two-story residences
will require architectural approval .
12. That if the project is developed in phases, architectural
r
approval be required for each please.
13. That minimum setbacks be indicated on the approved siting plan
for each phase.
14. That a maintenance district for landscape and lighting or a
homeowner's association be established to provide for maintenance
of the common areas, with form of District approved by City
Attorney.
15. That the codes, covenants, and restrictions be submitted to
the City for approval .
ADOPTED this 3rd day of July 1991.
AYES: Councilmembers Broich, Hodges, Murawski , Neel and Mayor Bono
NOES: None
ABSENT: None 1
r ATTEST _ �.., CIT PALM RIN CALIFORNIA
By
y City Clerk page
REVIEWED & APPROVED:
c
r
r �
a
Res. No. 17565
{
b��-(5.4��9.OkG60c151C�r}9-OOO�i„U,_"_"v� _ ... _ ��:_ -• _�Y�-r
. � 5.35 E•57 BiEGrJ r}�::.r7.r?:_: '• V_ ..,_-r,..� .-
.. rc. :r ..:.La.l.a -=.•1.=.'AGO ( i = ..-Sy 'i` _i_4 t
q"°, 7 ;yo..woo.®.°.wt _. OJ��.F _CI• If
�_ GA�.6= -4 �_ �T�•pi� D �fb\• .7 If� _ n � .I_.---:-:41"�- .
_ � .� ?.ir. .,fig Y "�• -Q:�.•:��.��
6° -==✓- ;t;°.sa:s.a.mz a •c4°-am ►.o..e,*�:z.nQ ' t
AA
It
pr
031.
Ip
�y PROJECT
-MW%1EW ROAD
U4Z VE_GAS ROd s
\ ' WAY ORIVEOSEIVE a ,
z
PROJECT SITE -
f71\
1 SAN RAFAEL ROACH .
�(JQINITY MAP
CITY OF �a PE#I...M SPRINGS
CASE NO. .0560-PD-213 (Revised ____ DESCWPfION Revised PD & TTM to build ,
�T TTM 26578 (Revised) SF housing project on 348 lots on Gateway
Michael Christian _ between Viw 111/N. Indian Canon, R1C ne
y y---^—
�. Section 34. —�—