HomeMy WebLinkAbout5/3/1989 - MINUTES CITY OF PALM SPRINGSd
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
MAY 3, 1989
A Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Palm Springs,
California, was called to order by Mayor Bono, in the Council
Chamber, 3200 Tahquitz-McCallum Way, on Wednesday, May 3, 1989,
at 7:30 p.m.
ROLL CALL: Present: Councilmembers Apfelbaum, Broich, Foster,
Neel and Mayor Bono
Absent: None
The meeting was opened with the salute to the Flag, and a moment
of silence.
REPORT OF POSTING OF AGENDA:
Report of City Clerk: The agenda was posted in accordance
with Council policy on April 28, 1989.
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY: Mayor declared the meeting adjourned
for the purpose of convening as the Community Redevelopment Agency;
after which, members reconvened as the City Council .
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1. TPM 24346 - JOHN WESSMAN:
Recommendation: That the Council consider an application
by Mainiero, Smith & Associates representing John Wessman
to subdivide a 38-acre parcel for industrial purposes
for property on the southeast corner of Ramon Road/Gene
Autry Trail , M-1 Zone, Section 20.
Planning Director reviewed the memorandum of Director
of Community Development, and stated that the there will
be 28 lots varying in size from 1-1% acres; that access (119)
to Ramon Road for internal lots has been provided via
cross easements through the parking area, which will serve
in the same manner as a frontage road; that a signal is
required at the main entrance, the cost to be shared with
the property to the north, across Ramon Road, and installed
when warrants are met - which might be when the development
is completed. In answer to question by Council he stated
that the signal could also be required at the time of
development.
Mayor declared the hearing opened; there were no
appearances, and the hearing was closed.
Resolution 16750 approving TPM 24346, as recommended,
was presented; after which, it was moved by Foster, seconded
by Broich, and unanimously carried, that R16750 be adopted,
subject to conditions that access to Ramon Road be limited
to right-turn only, and that the required traffic signal
be installed at the time of development.
Council Minutes
5-3-89 Page 2
2. TPM 23123 (Revised) - PETER McKERNAN:
Recommendation: That the Council consider an application
by ASL Consulting Engineers representing Peter McKernan
for a revised tentative parcel map to combine five lots
into one parcel on Vereda Del Sur/Via Las Palmas, R-1-A (119)
Zone, Section 10.
Councilmember Foster stated that he would abstain from
discussion and voting, due to a client relationship.
Planning Director reviewed the memorandum of Director
of Community Development, and stated that this is a second
revision of the project, which combines five lots into
one parcel , and that there were no public comments at
the Planning Commission hearing.
Mayor declared the hearing opened; there were no
appearances, and the hearing was closed.
Resolution 16751 approving TPM 231213 Revised, as
recommended, was presented; after which, it was moved
by Apfelbaum, seconded by Broich, and unanimously carried,
Foster abstaining, that R16751 be adopted.
3. ZTA 5.0400 - CITY OF PALM SPRINGS
Recommendation: That the Council consider amendment to
the Zoning Ordinance in Sections 9100.00 (definitions) ,
9201.00 (R-1) , 9209.00 (CBD), and 9320.00 (Signs). The
proposal would amend the definition of "Adult Entertainment
Establishments"; remove the exemption regarding price
signs at certain automobile service stations; allow for
off-site real estate signs; provide for accessory (103)
residential uses in the downtown area; and amend the
regulations regarding the placement of manufactured housing
on single-family lots.
Planning Director reviewed the memorandum of Director
of Community Development, and stated that currently all
but four of the service stations on Palm Canyon have price
signs, of which one has an approved sign; that it would
take 8-10 weeks for application processing, construction
and installation; that the Staff would work with the State
agency which enforces the posting of signs; that State
law mandates changes regarding manufactured housing; and
that the request for off-site real estate signs is, from
the Board of Realtors.
Director of Community Development stated that the
prohibition of off-site signs is the cornerstone of the
Sign Ordinance, and he considered it a step backward to
lift that prohibition; that it is the mainstay why the
City has not had billboards, and it has avoided a cluttered
appearance; that he questioned the price that will be
paid for making it easier for realtors to sell property;
and stated that: there will be hundreds; of more signs
throughout the community.
Mayor declared the hearing opened.
Council Minutes
5-3-89 Page 3 A,
81
3. ZTA 5.0400 (Continued)
Rod Dow, 1860 hliraloma, representing the Board of Realtors,
stated that the off-site signs relates to a consumer issue;
that the Planning Commission, and testimony at its public
hearing, favored the change; that other quality cities
allow open house signs; that he believes the slow growth
is related to slow real estate sales, which is hampered
by lack of open house signs; that residential properties
are not easily located in Palm Springs; that signs in
other areas identify the firm, but in Palm Springs buyers
cannot remember the name even, because all signs look
alike; and he urged that there be more freedom of design
and use of signs, i .e. , off-site directional signs. He
submitted a handout, a copy of which is on file with the
City Clerk.
Bob Fey submitted charts comparing cities in the Coachella
Valley in terms of real estate sales on the basis those
which allow off-site signs and those which do not allow
them; that the City should not be operating under a 1960
sign ordinance; that prohibition of off-site signs
discriminates against local realtors; that he supports
a prohibiting permanent off-site signs, but open house
directional arrows are temporary signs; that other tourist
cities allow them; and that the effort is not to add signs
at the same location; that a one-year trial period is
being requested.
Laurie Hampton, Prudential Pride Realtors, 255 N. Via
Las Palmas, read a letter from Arnold Isaak, supporting
allowing the open house arrow signs, a copy of which is
on file with the City Clerk; and relayed an experience
she had which demonstrated to her the increase in the
number of potential buyers at an open house when directional
signs were in place, versus than when they were not.
Katrina Heinrich, West World Properties, also stated that
the subject is a consumer issue, and added that the signs
are temporary on any weekend, and real estate "inventory"
is not concentrated in one location.
Nicholas Granet, resident, stated that he explored the
desert area, and then decided to purchase a home in Palm
Springs, and whatever the reasons are that sales are slow,
it is not because of a lack of directional signs.
Roger Radley, 1082 Escadero, stated that there is a larger
economic issue, and it is not related to signs; that he
supports a plan to restore Palm Springs' prestige, and
stated that one in two hundred people buy based on visiting
an open house, but seventeen of the two hundred buy in
the same community; that when he posted illegal directional
signs, he had seventeen people come to an open house,
of which two were strong leads; and suggested that the
Council choose to look at things differently.
Charles Hough, 1700 Sunrise (at Tamarisk) expressed fear
that his yard will sprout signs every weekend; that if
self-policed, the number of signs will be dictated by
how many can fit into the trunk of a car; that the City's
sign ordinance is exemplary, and the community is beautiful
for it, and a clutter of signs will spoil the very thing
that attracts people to buy property in Palm Springs;
and that the signs are not temporary, because they will
be there every weekend.
-y Council Minutes
5-3-89 Page 4
3. ZTA (Continued)
Bob Rothman, 2119 Los Patos, stated that he was on the
Sign Ordinance task force, and favors the off-site signs;
and commented on the Council 's rejection of allowing a
swap meet at the drive-in theater, which is now closed
and an eyesore.
Scott Lyle stated that realtors are often pressured by
homeowners to defy the ordinance, in order to help sell
their property, which places a hardship on both the realtor
and the owner; that there was no down-valley competition
in 1960, because there were no homes there then; that
the Palm Springs image attracts people to the area, but
the invisible signs say, "head east;" and that the period
would be to try the idea, and he urged approval .
Karen Aguilar, 1975 Mark Leslie, indicated the number
of directional signs each Councilmember• would need if
they wanted to sell their homes.
Paul Shepard, 817 Mission Road, Board of Realtors, stated
that the City asked the Board for help in cleaning up
downtown, and the Board is asking for the Council to help
realtors, in return.
Jan Hessman, 1984 San Antonio Road, member of Palm Desert
Board of Realtors, encouraged approval of the proposal ,
and stated that he did not see any connection between
directional signs and billboards.
In answer to questions by Council , Planning Director stated
that, technically, a 4-way intersection could have as
many as two signs in each direction at each leg of the
intersection, however, the intent is that: one sign would
serve to move the same direction for all parties.
Motion was made by Broich to approve the ordinance, as
recommended; said motion failed for lack of a second.
In answer to additional questions, Planning Director stated
that the Planning Commission vote was 4-2-0-1; that it
did not discuss limiting signs on major thoroughfares;
that there was discussion about a permit fee, however,
because of the complexity of the enforcement (identifying
and monitoring which signs are permitted and which have
no permit) and the fact that the trial period is only
twelve months, the recommendation was to defer that start
up during the first year; that realtors appeared to have
considered $10-20 per sign, however, weekend enforcement
costs could raised it higher than that; that enforcement
will involve some reorganization to concentrate zoning
enforcement, probably people working weekends, to police
it and report back on the success or failure of it.; and
that the priority of enforcement and funding 'it will be
a decision of the Council ; that the service station price
signs are regulated by the State, and require a minimum
6" letter height, which is recommended to be the local
maximum height; that the numbers are -incorporated into
the signal sign, and to permit it as an on-site sign,
would necessitate pulling those sections and reviewing
other aspects of the ordinance; and that the number of
off-site directional real estate signs is limited to two
per residence.
Council Minutes
5-3-89 Page 5 28
3. ZTA (Continued
Councilmember Apfelbaum stated that the prohibition of
off-site signs is the cornerstone of the quality aesthetics
of Palm Springs, which is what makes Palm Springs unique,
scenic, uncluttered, low profile, and blended environment;
that the issue is a consumer issue, but one which relates
to all businesses, and in this case, would give one business
a special interest and advantage not shared by others;
that is would be precedent setting, and not fair to other
businesses; that the argument that realtors do not have
sales, because they do not have signs, is specious; that
it would take 15 signs to provide "direction" to the
Councilmember's homes; and that the challenge is to keep
the quality hat has been the basis of the community.
Councilmember Broich stated that the Sign Ordinance was
adopted 30 years ago, and the Council must look forward;
and that more property sales can only help the
community.
Mayor stated that he did not think the "delicacy" of the
community is at odds with either side of the argument;
that the realtors have an awareness of that delicacy,
and know the needs of the community; that he does not
think they will blatantly pollute the environment with
signs; that signs are being installed illegally for the
purpose of survival , and if a legal solution cannot be
found, the enforcement against illegal signs will become
bigger; that the Council must look at people's survival
as well ; and that if everyone is aware of the needs and
requirements, the goal can be fulfilled.
In answer to questions by Council , Assistant City Attorney
stated that the Board of Realtors could not be assessed
a fee, as a separate agency, and the only way to cover
enforcement would be through a permit process; that only
the place and manner of the sign can be regulated, although
it is difficult to be a comprehensive sign ordinance without
some reference to content; that a good argument could
be made that an "open house" sign with an arrow is no
less onerous on the community than another off-site sign
with other words on it; and that a court might look
favorably on such a request, which could impact the
prohibition of billboards.
Councilmember Foster stated that he would be willing to
try the proposal for one year, but to prohibit the signs
on Palm Canyon, Tahquitz Way, and Tahquitz-McCallum.
City Clerk read title of the Ordinance, as follows:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA,
AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE IN REGARD TO ADULT
ENTERTAINMENT ESTABLISHMENTS, GASOLINE PRICE SIGNS,
REAL ESTATE SIGNS, CONVERSION OF SECOND STORY SPACE
TO RESIDENTIAL USE, AND MANUFACTURED HOUSING.
It was moved by Broich, seconded by Foster, and unanimously
carried, that further reading be waived.
It was moved by Broich, seconded by Foster, and carried
by the following vote, that the Ordinance be amended to
prohibit off-site residential real estate signs on Palm
Canyon, Tahquitz Way, and Tahquitz-McCallum Way (permits
elsewhere) and be introduced, as amended:
AYES: Broich, Foster & Bono
NOES: Apfelbaum & Neel
ABSENT: None
.a CS a Council Minutes
5-3-89 Page 6
4. CDBG Program, 1989-90
Recommendation: That the Council approve allocations
of 1989-90 Community Development Block Grant entitlement
and reprogrammed funds.
Housing Coordinator stated that the following projects
are recommended, based on public input: Program
Administration, $32,000; Fair Housing, $35,000; Nightingale
Manor, $21,840; Desert Aids Project, $10,000; Alternatives (85)
to Domestic Violence, $5,017; Senior Center Furnishings,
$100,000; Fire Hydrant Upgrade Crossley Tract, $6,000;
Single Family Rehabilitation/Senior Home Repair Programs,
$75,000; multifamily Rehabilitation Program, $60,000;
and Crossley Tract Streets Improvements., $100,000. She
noted that the $100,000 for the senior center is in addition
to the $100,000 previously allocated.
Mayor inquired if anyone wished to be heard.
James Jessie, Desert Highland Unity Cent.er, stated that
the Desert Highland-Gateway Estates community proposed
an upgrade of the picnic area, which would include tables,
play area, access roadway, lighting, and parking; however,
the request was made after the public hearings were held,
and requested that if funds are available mid-year, or
there are excess CDBG funds available, that the project
be given favorable consideration.
Ernest Noia, 457 Santiago Way, stated that the Senior
Center Building fund is progressing; that the 88-89
allocation will make the City's participation equal to
the County's share; and that bids should be received within
a few weeks, and it will be known how close the funding
matches the need.
There were no further appearances, and the hearing was
closed.
Resolution 16752 approving allocations, as recommended,
was presented; after which, it was moved by Broich, seconded
by Foster, and unanimously carried, that RL6752 be adopted;
and that the request of the Desert Highland Unity Center
be given consideration for any excess CDBG funds.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
a) Dangerous Animals:
The following persons spoke concerning a cougar on
Camino del Sur, and requested that the Council direct
the City Attorney to complete the draft ordinance
which the Council requested several months ago:
Katrina Heinrich, realtor representing Mr. & Mrs.
Haydock, 404 Camino del Sur, stated that because of
disclosure requirements, the presence of the cougar ( )
next door must be divulged to prospective buyers;
that there is a serious buyer for the Flaydock residence,
but will not complete the transaction as long as the
cougar is there, which is not within the control of
the Haydocks.
Council Minutes 2 8 8
5-3-89 Page 7
Bob Haydock stated that the presence of the cat was
a fate accompli ` when he returned home three years
ago; that the cat is not always caged; that he considers
it a security risk; and that it does not belong in
there.
Jane Haydock stated that they lived in the home before
the cougar arrived next to them; and that it is unfair CONT D
that they are unable to utilize their full property, ( )
for fear of the cougar.
Gary Scherotter, Camino del Sur, stated That three
months ago the Council directed the City Attorney
to prepare an ordinance to deal with dangerous animals,
but six weeks later, the Attorney told him that he
had not worked on it. He requested that the Attorney
be directed to do what it asked to be done.
Ken Feenstra, 385 Valmonte Norte, commented on an
experience one of his children had in another community,
when a wild coyote was kept by a neighbor - resulted
in the child being attacked - and that the outcome
was that the neighbor voluntarily removed the animal
to a more appropriate setting.
Note: Both Katrina Heinrich, and Karen Aguilar (Board
Realtors) addressed the Council at the end of the
meeting, and again asked that the Council so direct
the City Attorney.
Mayor stated that the Council will look into the matter;
and it was agreed that Councilmembers would individually
take Field trips to the residence to see the situation
for themselves - prior to next study session.
b) George Goldberg, 1445 "cesspool " commented on recycling
waste, the new local visitor and promotion board and
challenged spending local dollars for the Greater
CVB; commented on the loss of "The Barn" downtown
and designating other structures substandard and to
be demolished, including "Saturdays," and that certain
staff should be eliminated.
c) Emile Duvernay, Hermosa Drive, cited several occasions
since March, when he called for the Police Department
to cite and remove an abandoned vehicle in his
neighborhood; that he was promised action, but none
was taken; and stated his opinion that people will
take it more seriously, if it is made more difficult
and onerous for a person to abandon a vehicle.
d) John Wessman, P.S. Now, submitted letter supporting
action on Item 6; and expressed his personal support
of Items 5 and 7.
e) Dee Dee Stone, 142 Eastlake, opposed the International
Raceway, and commented on her opinion that Palm Springs
is losing its "far away quality, and vastness. "
Council Minutes
r 5-3-89 Page 8
f) Plaza Theater:
Dan Post, 267 S. Patencio, Desert Performing Art Series,
spoke in support of allowing them to use the Plaza
Theater for performances, if that becomes available.
Mike Dutton, 73744 Highway 111, Palm Desert, supported
Item 5, and suggested a "remember the stars" week
when the film festival opens.
Chris Baker, 21.9 Saturmino, Board of Governors of
Valley Players Guild, supported the reopening of an
upgraded Plaza Theater, and stated that funding is
committed, and not an issue; that it would improve
the downtown, sociologically, and give credence to
election campaign promises; and that the building
should be restored to its former glory.
LEGISLATIVE ACTION:
5. PLAZA THEATER RESTORATION:
Recommendation: That the Council approve consultant
agreement/Plaza Theater restoration; finding of
compatibility of PEG funds; and setting of project budget.
Director of Economic Development reviewed his report,
detailing the proposed improvements as Phase I , totalling
an estimated $532,161, for which $350,000 is committed
through gifts (John Wessman and Metropolitan Theaters,
each $50,000) and from Warner Cable (PEG funds) $250,000,
leaving a balance of $190,000 to complete the first phase;
that the opening would be in January, 1990 concurrently
with the film festival ; that Robert McCann, the proposed
architect, has extensive experience in theater architecture,
i .e. , restoration of facilities of the vintage of the
Plaza Theater; that a proposal for use by local groups
will be developed; and that if the facility if not restored,
Metropolitan Theaters proposes to close the building,
and simply continue its lease payments. ( 124 )
Councilmember Apfelbaum stated that she considered the
project a plus for downtown, but was concerned about the
work proposed to be completed by Stein, and preferred
soliciting additional proposals., i .e. , from Herb & Scott
Rogers, before a decision is made. She moved for approval
of the proposed resolutions, excluding the work to be
performed by Stein, until additional proposals are received;
said motion was seconded by Broich, and latter superseded.
In answer to question by Councilmember Foster, Assistant
City Manager stated that both local and corporate offices
of Warner Cable understand the intent of the use of the
PEG funds, and are in agreement that it meets the franchise
agreement and Federal law; and he explained the PEG funds,
and stated that the stage and theater are, per se, a studio.
Councilmember Foster stated that he had concerns about
the economic viability of the property when it was
purchased, and that it will end up costing the City money;
that it was said that little would be spent to iremove
the partition, replace seats and vinyl , for about
$100,000-200,000, and something has happened since to
add the other items, e.g. , dressing rooms, rebuilt stage,
stage managers office; that a first phase suggests there
Council Minutes
5-3-89 Page 9
5. PLAZA THEATER (Continued)
is more to follow; that $85,000 plus is being suggested
for architectural fees for a project that was only going
to restore the building to its original condition; that
other projects have been delayed for weeks, but this
decision is being made in two days; that he has not toured
the building, nor has the Council talked with anyone about
live theater, financial implications as to how much it
will cost to maintain it after it is finished, who will
use it - or how often, and whether Rogers is committed,
and for how much money; that Metropolitan Theaters lease
payment is $57,000, and if the site is restored and used
by others, he questioned if it would no longer have to
make those payments; that if the original intent of
restoring it were followed, he believed the estimates
would be about $200,000, and perhaps the other funds could
be used to maintain the building, or subsidize other types
of films, e.g. , classics; that enlargement of the lobby
would involve Historic Site Preservation Board approval ;
that he would like the decision delayed in order to
thoroughly study the ramifications of the potential use,
management costs, maintenance costs, and to be sure of
where the project is headed, and how 800+ seats will pay
for live theater.
Councilmember Apfelbaum stated that two members of the
Council had information, as well as a tour of the theater,
after meeting with Mr. Rogers, which was not communicated
very well to the full Council .
City Manager stated that the meetings with Mr. Rogers
were helpful , but it is not directly related to the proposed
recommendation on Phase I ; and if that proceeds, additional
matters will have to come back to the Council .
Economic Development Director stated that theaters in
both Pasadena and La Mirada have been toured; that sets
can be reduced in size to be accommodated in the Plaza
Theater; that Mr. Rogers proposed moving the shows from
La Mirada to Palm Springs; that the sets do not require
a fly loft; that the sound and lighting proposed is for
anything that happens on the stage - not for full theater
- and anyone who wants to come in will bring their own
lights. He stated that originally the proposal was to
open the movie theater, leaving the lobby unadorned, and
having restoration a part of fund-raising; that he reached
the conclusion that the project could be lost if it opened
with "less than good" quality, and $433,000 of the estimate
is in hard improvements; that the dressing rooms, stage
manager cubicle are $5,000, the sound $50,000 and the
lighting $40,000.
Councilman Foster stated that he was upset and offended
at not having been more involved than the Council should
have. been.
Discussion ensued in order to address Councilmember Foster's
concerns, including a motion by Apfelbaum, and seconded
by Neel , to continue this matter to May 9 - said motion
later withdrawn; comments by John Wessman as to timing
for the project, and the need for the architect to move
ahead quickly with the drawings; possibility of the Council
authorizing the design work to proceed, but reviewing
the scope of the work within the next few weeks; concerns
by Councilmember Broich that he preferred the full Council
to vote on this matter; and comments by the Mayor that
"troopers" and the audience are what make a performance,
and not just the facility.
Council Minutes
5-3-89 Page 10
5. PLAZA THEATER (Continued)
Following discussion, it was moved by Apfelbaum, seconded
by Foster, and unanimously carried, that R,16753 authorizing
the McCann Group to proceed with the architectural drawings,
and establishing a budget therefore of $53,267; directing
that the scope of work be reviewed by the Council within
the next two weeks; and directing that additional proposals
be obtained to be considered along with that of Mr. Steins.
6. DOWNTOWN MASTER PLAN -- ROBERT F. JANI
On April 19, 1989, the Council continued consideration
of agreement with Robert F. Jani Productions for the
development of a preliminary master plan study for the
greater downtown area, for $50,000 plus billable expenses; (101)
and budget allocation of $60,000 therefore.
Council discussion ensued concerning the need for a market
study simultaneous with the Jani proposal . Monte ILukow,
of Palm Springs Now, stated that the group favors the
Jani proposal , and the market study.
Councilmember Broich stated that the City' s market is
the convention and family visitor, and he questioned why
another study is needed.
Mayor stated that the study would go beyond that point,
and help identify markets that could be added, or which
should be focused as part of the marketing program.
City Manager stated that a recommendation will be back
to the Council in the next few weeks.
MO ,434,4 and R16754, approving Agreement 2704, and amending
the budget, as recommended, were presented; after which,
it was moved by Foster, seconded by Apfelbaum, and
unanimously carried, that MO 4244 an R16754 be adopted.
7. MEASURE "A" (SALES TAX) FUNDING LOCAL STREETS & ROADS
Recommendation: That the Council approve a 5-year plan
for expenditure of Measure A funds for local streets
resulting from the one-half percent State sales tax increase
approved by the voters in November, 1988.
City Manager stated that Sunline also has a recommendation,
and he recommended, that the Council approve both plans (117)
in concept, with the understanding that the matter will
be brought back, to the Council to choose the preferred
approach.
Resolution 16755, approving both plans, as recommended
by the City Manager, was presented; after which, it was
moved by Apfelbaum, seconded by Foster, and unanimously
carried, that R16755 be adopted.
Coouncil Minutes
5-3-89 Page 11
8. MUNICIPAL GOLF COURSE PROMOTIONAL FEE ADJUSTMENTS:
Recommendation: That the Council amend the Municipal
Code to authorize the Director of General Operations to (103 &
make temporary fee and policy adjustments for promotional 114)
purposes at the Palm Springs Municipal Golf Course; and
amend the Comprehensive Fee Schedule Res. No. 16319, to
include the promotional Fee Policy and all Golf Course
Fees; and rescind Res. No. 13834 and 16564. This item
was reviewed in study session, and no further report was
given.
City Clerk read title of the Ordinance, as follows:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA,
AMENDING ORDINANCE 11.32.040 IN REGARD TO AUTHORIZATION
FOR PRESCRIBING INTERIM PROMOTIONAL FEES
Resolution 16756 amending the Fee Schedule and Rescinding
Resolutions 13845 and 16564, as recommended, were presented;
after which, it was moved by Apfelbaum, seconded by Neel ,
and unanimously carried, that further reading of the
Ordinance be waived; that the Ordinance be introduced
for first reading; and that R16756 be adopted.
ADDITIONAL LEGISLATIVE ACTION: (Satisfied agenda posting
requirement; materials at study session)
9A. PRESENTATION FOLDERS - FILM FESTIVAL
Recommendation: That the Council ratify emergency purchase
of multi-insert presentation folders from Rubidoux Printing,
and Change Order No. 1 ($2,675. 18) thereto, for a total
cost of $8,347.24. This item was reviewed in study session,
and no further report was given. (50)
MO 4358 ratifying purchase and approving change order,
as recommended, was presented; after which, it was moved
by Broich, seconded by Foster, and unanimously carried,
that MO 4358 be adopted.
CONSENT AGENDA:
10. Res 16757 accepting the grant offer of the United States
of America through the Federal Aviation Administration, AIP (51)
Project 3-06-0181-09 - Agr #2705.
11. Res 16758 approving the acquisition of 20 acres of land next
to the Wastewater Treatment Plant on Mesquite Avenue in Section (61 &
19 in the amount of $2,000,000; and Res 16765 amending the 127)
budget to appropriate $2,005,500 therefore.
12. Res 16759 declaring land leased to the Oasis Water Park to
be held for exchange, and directing its sale. (109)
13. Res 16760 declaring 10 acres on Tamarisk Road to be surplus
land. (117)
14. MO 4345 awarding contract to Conrad & Associates to perform
the City's June 30, 1989 financial audit at a maximum fee (52)
of $35,730.
15. MO 4346, authorizing modification of police vehicle by Universal
Procurement Inc. , Scottsdale, for $33,750.00. (84)
16. MO 4347, approving purchase of tables from A to Z Rentals,
Palm Spring for $9,217.80. (84)
17. MO 4348 approving purchase of concrete benches and trash
containers from Quick Crete, Inc. , Norco, for $13,970.80. (84)
0
Council Minutes
5-3-89 Page 12
18. Res 16761 amending Allocated Positions and Compensation Plan
for Community Development and Community Services and Promotion (61:1
Departments, and MO 4349 approving contract with Duca and
McCoy, as City Engineer. A2706.
19. MO 4350 approving purchase of portable stage risers from (139)
Sico Inc. , Minneapolis for $43,412.73.
20. MO 4351 approving the purchase of one four-wheel drive Jeep (84)
Cherokee utility vehicle, from Swift Jeep-Eagle, Sacramento,
for $18,098.40.
21. MO 4352 approving delivery and installation of hydromulch (84)
with Hybrid 328 Bermuda grass shoots to Southern California
Hydroseed & Hydromulch, Inc. , for $.47 per square foot,
($9,400. ).
22. MO 4353 awarding construction contract for the Air-Carrier
Ramp expansion project, AIP-3-06-0181-10, C:P88-53, to E.L. (51)
Yeager Construction Company Inc. , for $922,160 - A2707.
23. MO 4354 approving purchase of one hot tar crack sealer from (136)
Brewer Cote of Santa Fe Springs, for $13,432.52.
24. Res 16762, 16763 and 16764 approving Payroll Warrants and (86)
Claims & Demands.
25. MO 4355 approving a change in the City' s Investment Policy
to authorize the purchase of corporate notes and investment ( )
vehicles with a maturity in excess of five years.
26. MO 4356 approving Amendment No. 1 to license agreement #2475
with Desert Cab Co. , for a change in insurance coverage, (147)
rate increases, and an increase in the Airport; surcharge.
27. Res WITHDRAWN stating Council position on S 7.
(Cranston) "California Desert Protection Act of 1989".
28. MO 4357 authorizing the award of contract to Peat Marwick
Main & Co. to provide for investment arbitrage calculation (86)
services for $6,600 - A2708; and Res 16765 amending the budget (61)
to appropriate additional funds for investment arbitrage
calculation services.
It was moved by Foster, seconded by Broich, and unanimously
carried, that Resolutions 16757 through 16765, and Minute
Orders 4345trough 4357 be adopted.
ADDED STARTERS: None
REPORTS & REQUESTS:
CITY COUNCIL reports & requests
a) Councilmember Broich requested that an item be placed
on the next agenda to request the President of the
United States to activate the armed services in the
war against drugs.
PUBLIC reports & requests
a) Note: see above public comments, for requests
reiterated by Katrina Heinrich and Ms. Aguilar.
Council Minutes
Q
I
5-3-89 Page 13 a ..�
STAFF reports & requests - None
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, Mayor declared the meeting
adjourned to Tuesday, May 9, 1989, 2 p.m. , in the Large
Conference Room, City Hall .
L�OUDITH SUMICH
City Clerk