Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout4/11/1989 - MINUTES �t3 CITY OF PALM SPRINGS CITY COUNCIL MINUTES APRIL 11, 1989 An Adjourned Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Palm Springs, California, was called to order by Mayor Bono, in the Large Conference Room, City Hall , 3200 Tahquitz-McCallum Way, on Tuesday, April 11, 1989, at 3 p.m. ROLL CALL: Present: Councilmembers Apfelbaum, Broich, Foster, Neel and Mayor Bono Absent: None REPORT OF POSTING OF AGENDA: Report of City Clerk: The agenda was posted in accordance with Council policy on April 7, 1989. HEARING: 1. P.D. 200 - TM 24347 - VACATION INTERNATIONALE On April 5, 1989, the Council continued hearing on (116) recommendation to approve a planned development district, and tentative tract map, to convert 66 units to time share for the Oasis Water Park and Resort (formerly Cherokee Village) at 4190 E. Palm Canyon - no further staff report was given. Mayor inquired if anyone wished to be heard. Bonnie Garland Guss, attorney representing the applicant, stated that there are benefits to the City, which were previously discussed, and asked what were the concerns of the Council . Mayor stated that he listened to the tape recording for the meeting, and the issues related to the type of sale, and whether it is an offensive, or hardcore, program. Bob Byrnes, President of the Company, stated that industry has had unsavory practices, but the plan for this project has been outlined, and there will not be any street solicitation; that applicants will be pre-screened, and the presentation will extend over three nights; and that he talked with individual Councilmembers to explain the proposal . In answer to question by Council concerning payment of the T.O.T. under protest, Mr. Estepp, General Counsel , for the applicant, stated that the Planning Commission minutes accurately reflected his statement, and explained that if the decision of pending litigation is a determination that the tax is not applicable to time share companies, he would anticipate seeking a refund of the tax, and the Assistant Director of Finance has said that refunds might have to be made, depending on the court decision, regardless of whether paid under protest; that they intend to follow the law and pay the tax, and to follow whatever the decision is; and that he understood the likelihood of that case affecting the proposed project to be somewhat remote, because it is not a deed time share plan as are all parties in the lawsuit. Council Minutes 4-11-89 Page 2 _f 1. PD 200 (Continued) City Attorney stated that the Counsel recognizes that the case in question deals with only the estate type of time share, and arguments made in the litigation deal with the fact that parties claim to be owners of the property and that they are being double taxed:, and he explained the difference under State Law between the estate and use time share. Both the City Attorney and the Assistant Director of Finance explained, in detail , how the room tax would be computed for this project, which is complicated, but not insurmountable. Mr. Hazelrigg stated that the project occupancy rose from 18% last year to 46% this year; and is projected at 64%; and stated that time is critical , and asked for action. There were no further appearances, and the hearing was closed. Councilmember Foster stated that he is concerned about breaking down the down, and the rationale that a hotel is having difficulty operating as such, and 'then going time share; that he questions if it will cause other hotels to do likewise, or something else in order to create more activity in the hotel ; that he would like to discuss the matter more with the City Attorney, and establish guidelines. Mr. Brynes stated that the success of time shares is in condominiums and not in hotels; and he agreed that they should not get out of hand, however, the applicant is taking a positive approach. Ms. Guss stated that the application process was followed at the suggestion of the Planning Director. Councilmember Foster stated that he has a problem in that the RGA8 zone does not allow time share, and once it is permitted, he would find it difficult to deny others the same use, which he thinks will breakdown the zone. Councilmember Broich stated that the proposed site is a condominium style, not a hotel , which sets it apart from other hotels. Resolution 16731 and 16732 as recommended, were presented; after which, it was moved by Broich, seconded by Neel , and carried by the following vote, that R16731 and 16732 be adopted: AYES: Apfelbaum, Broich, Neel & Bono NO: Foster ABSENT: None A Council Minutes 4-11-89 Page 3 2. EASTER WEEK - FUNDING OF CONTRACTUAL LAW ENFORCEMENT FOR SPRING BREAK Recommendation: That the Council approve an expenditure (113) of $176,759 for contractual services from the Riverside County Sheriff' s Department, and the California Highway Patrol ; services were used to augment, and support, the Police Department during Spring Breaks. Police Chief stated that the services were budgeted, and the authorization for expenditure of the funds is needed. MO 4336 and 4337 authorizing agreements, as recommended, A#2696 and 2697, were presented; after which, it was moved by Broich, seconded by Foster, and unanimously carried, that MO 4336 and 4337 be adopted. 3. COMMISSION APPOINTMENTS Mayor announced his appointment of the following persons (60) to the Palm Springs Visitors & Promotion Board: 250+ room hotel - Paul Hornyak, 6-30-90 150-249 rooms - Alan Ayres, 6-30-92 51-149 rooms - Philip Lotz, 6-30-90 1 - 50 rooms - Bob Whitehorn, 6-30-91 Retail/Restaurant - Steve Rosen, 6-30-91 Chuck Murawksi , 6-30--92 Kurt Handshuh, 6-30-91 Tourism Involved - Mort Golden, 6-30-90 Gary Walker, 6-30-92 Council - Tuck Broich, 6-30-91 Sonny Bono, 6-30-92 Councilmember Apfelbaum stated that the persons suggested are, individually, outstanding but, as a group, do not represent the tourist, financial , accounting, sales, or marketing aspects of the community; that there is not a woman on the board; and that the makeup is constrictive. Councilmember Neel stated that he did not approve of the means of selecting the members, and that he does not know all of the individuals; that he thinks there should be a more personal means of interviews (one-to-one) ; and that he did not think enough people were aware of the opportunity . Councilmember Broich stated that the openings were advertised; that the Council interviewed the applicants; that the Mayor interviewed the applicants; that it is the Council ' s obligation to ratify appointments; and that there is an agreement in place specifying the makeup of the board. Councilmember Apfelbaum stated that she wanted to make certain that the board will have the broad range of expertise it will need, and that five hoteliers sets the board off balance, and set up a special interest. Council Minutes 4-11-89 Page 4 3. COMMISSION APPOINTMENTS (Continued) Councilmember Broich stated that the makeup of the group cannot be changed at this point; that hopefully the board's work will result in filling hotels, and bring people and dollars to the community. Mayor stated that the representation of the board is fixed by the agreement. Councilmember Apfelbaum stated that she did not sign the agreement, and that it is restrictive in that it does not simply impose hotel representation, it limits that to certain sizes. Councilmember Foster stated that perhaps that can be changed in the future, but not now; that is in this form because of the majority of the Council 's desire to not have the initiative measure; and that the agreement must be Followed. He questioned if there were individuals or categories that should be further considered. Councilmember Apfelbaum stated that she considered it unfair to the individuals involved to discuss personalities in public, and she was not willing to do so. City Attorney stated that the Brown Act was amended in the 1970s to remove the ability to discuss appointments in closed sessions. Mayor stated that he understood Councilmember Apfelbaum's view that she did not agree with the original deal , and respected the comments concerning women appointees, which was not intentional ; and questioned if there were specific alternative suggestions. It was moved by Broich, seconded by Foster, and carried by the following vote, that the above appointments be approved: AYES: Broich, Foster & Bono NOES: Apfelbaum & Neel ABSENT: None ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Mayor declared the meeting adjourned. JUDITH SUMICH City Clerk