HomeMy WebLinkAbout10/19/1988 - MINUTES CITY OF PALM SPRINGS I�
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
OCTOBER 19, 1988
A Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Palm Springs,
California, was called to order by Mayor Bono, in Lhe Council
Chamber, 3200 Tahquitz-McCallum Way, on Wednesday, October 19,
1988 at 7:30 p.m.
ROLL CALL: Present: Councilmembers Apfelbaum, Broich, Foster,
Neel and Mayor Bono
Absent: None
The meeting was opened with the salute to the Flag, and a moment
of silence.
REPORT OF POSTING OF AGENDA:
Report of City Clerk: The agenda was posted in accordance
with Council policy on October 14, 1988.
PRESENTATION OF AWARDS:
Mayor presented plaques of appreciation to former Mayor Frank
Bogert, and to former Members of the City Council Eli Birer
and Richard Smith.
Plaques were also presented to former Commissioners McKinney,
Neel , Crowe, Hird, Coletti , Hodges, Schoenberger, Tipton, and
Hardenberg (unavailable for presentation: Weiss, Kahn and
Curtis).
Employee Recognition Award: Presented to Mark Harvey, Police (74)
Department.
Mayor read a proclamation declaring October 23-30, 1988 as
Red Ribbon Week (anti-drug program) and presented it to Police
Officer Paquette. She introduced the following students, who
each presented a ribbon to the Council : Kim Starr, Bill Gonzales,
Amanda Cornell , Craig Elch, and O'Connell .
Following the recess later in the meeting, a Certificate of
Appreciation was presented to the Mayor from the Vietnam Veterans
of America, Chapter 368.
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY: Mayor declared the meeting adjourned
for the purpose of convening as the Community Redevelopment Agency;
after which, members reconvened as the City Council .
RECONVENED AS CITY COUNCIL TO CONDUCT JOINT PUBLIC HEARING RE PA1B7
PLAZA DE LAS FLORES PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT (ITEM CONTINUED - SEE
CRA MINUTES THIS DATE) :
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
It was moved by Broich, seconded by Foster, and unanimously
carried, that the Minutes of September 21, 1988 be adopted.
OTHER PUBLIC HEARINGS:
Council Minutes
10-19-88 Page 2
1. Z/C 5.0486 - PROFESSIONAL REAL ESTATE INVESTORS INC.
Recommendation: That the Council approve a change of
zone from RGA8 to R-4 for property on the NE corner of
Avenida Caballeros and Amado Road, Section 14.
Planning Director reviewed memorandum of Director of
Community Development, and stated that in light of potential (149)
multi-story hotel development across the street, the
developers of LaMancha sought advice on planning the
remainder of its property, and received a recommendation
for rezoning; that the zone meets the General Plan
designation, and there are mitigations for additional
sewer capacity and added traffic flows. In answer to
question by Council , he stated that change includes a
portion of the existing development (about 2 acres) in
the southerly 10 acres.
Mayor declared the hearing opened.
James Schlecht, attorney for the developer, indicated
his availability for questions.
There were no further appearances, and the hearing was
closed.
City Clerk read title of the Ordinance, as follows:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA,
AMENDING THEZONING MAP FROM R-G-A(8) RESIDENTIAL GARDEN
APT. ) TO R-4 (LARGE SCALE HOTEL AND MULTI-FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL ZONE ) FOR 8. 59 ACRES LOCATED ON THE
NORTHEAST CORNER OF AMADO ROAD AND AVENIDA CABALLEROS,
SECTION 14.
It was moved by Neel , seconded by Broich, and unanimously
carried, that further reading be waived, and that the
ordinance be introduced for first reading.
2. VAR. 6.363 - BERKOWITZ (APPEAL)
Consideration of appeal by Larry Berkowitz from Planning
Commission denial of variance of additional height for
night lighting of tennis court at 580 W. Stevens Road
(matter continued from September 7 at appellant's request).
Planning Director reviewed memorandum of Director of
Community Development, and stated that a conditional use (146)
permit was granted by the Commission for night lighting
at approved heights; that the Commission could riot make
the findings required of a variance; and that it will
be looking at some minor changes which will be coming
to the Council at a later date, and if those changes were
in effect at this time, the height of the light would
be measured from the court, rather than at grade - which
would allow a greater height light if the court were sunken
- in this case a height of 13 feet; that the current
standards have been in effect since 1976; and that Dr.
Berkowitz is requesting a height of 18 feet, which is
the standard for tennis courts at hotels.
Mayor stated that tennis court lighting has changed
drastically since 1976, and a 10-foot height necessitates
angling the light to cover the court, but an 13-foot height
with the boxed light, allows it shine directly down on
court.
Council Minutes
10-19-88 Page 3 ;
2. VAR. BERKOWITZ (Continued)
Planning Director stated that the "shoebox" is the lighting
standard and is somewhat angled; that whether angled or
straight down is desirable would depend on the adjacent
property, and that is why public hearings are held; that
when the standards were developed in 1976, it was concluded
that multiple lights or commercial type lights were not
needed for residential play; and the potential zoning
text change would encourage sunken courts, and a
professional light at 6 feet.
Mayor declared the hearing opened.
Larry Berkowitz, appellant, stated that the lighting at
Angel Stadium is an example of angled lighting, vs. the
new lighting at the Airport which is directed downward;
that the 18-foot light produces less uneven lit areas,
and reduces wattage; that his court is sunken, and he
has a 7-13 foot landscaping around it, and 'there will
be added trees; that he does not want to invade other's
property, but the court cannot be seen from those property
owners who are opposed; that the mountains are not the
backdrop for the lights; that he does not know what,
if anything, is proposed on the vacant lots; that 10-foot
lights are more like floodlights; that he proposes a modern
light, cast downward, with additional shielding to reduce
glare and an halo effect; that there are other properties
in the general area with higher, multiple lights; that
the lighting has been approved, and the additional height
is not going to alter the noise level .
Herb Beaver, lighting consultant, stated that he has worked
with cities in writing ordinances, to preclude interference
with neighbor's rights, and only one did not have a viable
cut-off shield requirement; that the City's ordinance
is obsolete, and the most restrictive in California; that
owners should not be penalized for having sunk the court,
but rather have an advantage for having done so; that
all of the light would be contained on the property; and
he demonstrated the shield he has designed.
Michael Buccino, landscape architect, stated that the
ordinance was developed to secure quality for the city,
and that quality is controllable, and protection and
concealment can be attained through landscaping.
Bernard Silverman stated that the amended ordinance is
not before the Council , and that there are no 15-foot,
16-foot, or 18-foot lights in the area, with the exception
of perhaps one that is setback 180-feet from the property
line near O'Donnell Golf Course; that residential courts
should not be compared to hotel or commercial courts;
that a variance will establish precedent for others, and
a "used car lot" could potentially be created along the
vacant parcels; that he is not opposed to night play;
and suggested that efforts be made to adjust the 10-foot
lights to work the best for the court.
Dr. Berkowitz cited a number of locations which have higher
lights, e.g. , on Vista Chino, Camino Mirasol , Camino Norte.
Ken Haggstrom, 591 W. Stevens Road, stated that there
are seven parcels the most directly affected by the lights;
that the 18-foot poles look like utility poles, and he
moved to the area for its beauty and absence of poles;
that he favors a 10 p.m. curfew if the courts are approved;
that a precedent for a new height limit not be set; and
that of a very limited survey he conducted, 95% indicated
that they were opposed to lighting in residential areas.
Council Minutes
10-19-88 Page 4
2. BERKOWITZ (Continued)
There were no further appearances, and the hearing was
closed.
Councilmember Apfelbaum stated that she believes the
residential neighborhoods require special protection,
and agreed that the higher poles would look like utility
poles; that the Las Palmas area is an historic area, an
area in which the appearance has been maintained, and
the added height would be a degradation of that appearance;
and that granting the variance would be granting a special
privilege.
Councilmember Foster stated that he owns property within
400 feet and would abstain.
It was moved by Neel , seconded by Apfelbaum, and carried
by the following vote, that the appeal be denied, and
that the Comaission's action be upheld:
AYES: Apfelbaum, Broich & Neel
NO: Bono
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: Foster
NOTE: The following occurred at the end of the meeting
under Council Reports and Requests:
Councilmember Broich stated that he wished to change his
vote; that the City Attorney advised him during the recess,
that a matter could be reconsidered prior to the end of
the meeting in which the action occurred; and he moved
to reconsider this matter.
City Attorney stated that the Council 's Rules of Procedure
provide that a vote may be changed, without reconsideration,
prior to the next order of business; and that a motion
for reconsideration during the meeting may be adopted
if passed by a majority vote of those voting in favor
of the original motion; or that the Council may by majority
vote suspend 'its rules, and allow the Councilmember to
change his vote.
Councilmember Apfelbaum stated that she considered it
awkward to change the action after everyone had left the
Chamber.
City Attorney stated that Councilmember Foster could vote
on the question of suspending the rules.
Councilmember Foster stated that he felt he should abstain
on any action concerning this item.
Motion by Broich, seconded by Bono, to suspend the rules,
failed to carry by the following vote:
AYES: Broich & Bono
NOES: Apfelbaum & Neel
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: Foster
The original motion adopted stands.
Council Minutes
10-19-88 Page 5 kAil , w
3. PUBLIC NUISANCE ABATEMENT - 3882 SUNNY DUNES (OCHS)
Recommendation: That the Council deny appeal regarding
cost of abatement, and impose the special assessment lien
of $864.62.
Building & Safety Director reviewed memorandum of Director (57)
of Community Development, and stated that an on-site
investigation was made in the presence of Mr. Ochs; that
no excessive damage was found; and that the building was
broken into since the abatement, and re-secured by parties
unknown.
Mayor declared the hearing opened; there being no
appearances, the hearing was closed.
Resolution 16599 confirming the report, and imposing the
lien, was presented; after which, it was moved by Apfelbaum,
seconded by Foster, and unanimously carried, that R16599
be adopted.
4. PUBLIC NUISANCE ABATEMENT - 625 PALO VERDE (DEMPSEY)
Recommendation: That the Council deny appeal regarding
the abatement, and impose the special assessment lien
of $1,529.42.
Building & Safety Director reviewed memorandum of Director (57)
of Community Development, and stated that the owner
contested the need for the abatement on the grounds that
a sewer line had already been installed; that discussion
with the abatement contractor indicated that there was
a substandard line in the ground (installed without permit),
which was clogged; and that a new line was installed and
inspected.
Mayor declared the hearing opened; there were no
appearances, and the hearing was closed.
Resolution 16600 confirming report, and imposing lien,
as recommended, was presented; after which, it was moved
by Apfelbaum, seconded by Foster, and unanimously carried,
that R16600 be adopted.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
a) Dick Sroda, Concerned Citizens of Palm Springs
committee, commented on the hearing at the last meeting
regarding the city's promotion and marketing efforts
(CVB), and voiced strong opposition to the Mayor's
reference to "dissenters"; that he did not leave the
meeting early; that it was not true that the Vintage
race did not cost the City any money; that he considered
the hearing a sham, and that the people were made
to look foolish; that it should have been said the
Council was already decided, and the hearing should (50)
have been cancelled; that he did not think it was
the mayor's motion, rather that the City Manager was
"pulling the strings," and that the committee met
and gave a vote of no confidence to the mayor and
city manager.
Mayor stated that he had said at the very beginning
of the meeting that he had a plan, and it was not
the City Manager's plan; that he developed it after
Council Minutes
10-19-88 Page 6
talking with hoteliers; that the people who spoke
in favor of the merger were 2: 1 in favor; that he
had said he would continue working toward his plan,
unless there was a drastic difference of opinion in
the community; that he does not benefit from the merger;
and that he did not know if he had enough votes to
carry it.
b) Charles Luchetti , President of Expo Enterprises, stated
his opinion that the recommendation and resolution
regarding Item 13 do not accurately reflect action
of the staff regarding increase of density, and the
hotel site; that SENCA was hired by the City, completed
its study, and was paid; that it supposedly was hired
for a second study, but that it was SENCA Real Estate
Development Inc. , and out of that came the P.S. Classic
Inc. , which he believed is owned by the City; that
the resolution approves a project agreement entered
into between SENCA (P.S. Classic Inc, formed October
3, 1988) and the City, but actually is an agreement
between the City and Cantor; that his overall concern
is that P.S. Classic will be given the power, or ( )
consent, to proceed with a racetrack, golf course
and amphitheater, however., the resolution refers to
hotel and high density and that is not reflected in
any of the paperwork; that there were only three
questions asked at the study session one of which
related to wind on the golf course and racetrack;
that Page 9 of the project agreement indicates that
prior written or oral understanding are superseded;
that SENCA "crossed the line" when the City paid it,
and then included a joint venture which included a
private corporation, and a flipflop arrangement on
failure to perform; that he is not concerned whether
the City is repaid, but the zoning issues, and how
those impact a proposal he has been working on for
five years, and is ready to be brought forward; that
he felt the matter should be continue, and the Council
should loot: at it closely before proceeding; that
the original contract called for 500 acres, but the
proposed agreement is directed at 1.,500 acres in and
around Palm Springs, which gives a license anywhere
in Palm Springs, when they do not have the land, the
zoning, or the feasibility study; that SENCA has taken
the position that it is the master developer, which
in his reading of the agreement is not the case; and
that he question why the City was being asked to rule
on private contracts.
c) Shirley Barker, 158 Fondulac, stated that one of her
clients secured a permit for grading debris, and at
the end of the 120 days, she sought an extension,
only to be told that the permit should not have been
issued until a building and landscaping plan had been
submitted; that her client was not ready to proceed
with such plans, and only wished to clean up the
property, and she asked for a refund of the fee.
She stated that she is the treasurer of the Citizens
of Palm Springs committee, and relayed a scenario
in which she attempted to secure the proper permits
for the group to have a garage sale downtown, and
was told that it was not allowed, and that when she
changed the nature of the activity to a festival ,
she was told not to have the "tail wagging the dog,"
and r she was angry.
Council Minutes
10-19-88 Page 7
PUBLIC COMMENTS (Continued)
Councilmember Foster stated that there are many reasons
for not wanting garage sales downtown, even though
one may not make a big difference, others will want
to do the same thing.
d) George Goldberg, commented on RVs, and indicated his
experience with the City Attorney in trying to get
a revision to the Zoning Ordinance concerning parking
RVs in residential areas. He also commented on the
judicial system, violators, suggestion to have an
RV park in the community, and that he will be sending
more information to a larger number of people. He
expressed his opinion of the City Attorney.
e) Dr. Friedman, 235 S. Indian Avenue, stated that he
wants to open a dental technician and assistant school ,
for disadvantaged persons, and questioned qijhy it was
not allowed in the same zone as other types of schools,
e.g. , a beauty college. Dr. Friedman raised this
issue again at the end of the meeting; and it was
directed that it be discussed at study session, along
with information whether there are any such schools
associated with colleges or universities.
f) John Wyser (?) 3375 Fey Norte, again expressed his
concern regarding a racetrack in his area (P.S. Classic
project), and burden which might accrue to the City;
that he questioned if the oral report given at a recent
study session, included the feasibility study; that
the Phase I report was not available until after the
Phase II was approved, and asked if the feasibility
study will be available after relations are broken ( )
with SENCA; that he questioned how the public is to
make its concerns known if they do not have information
available to review; that he would like to have been
able to ask questions of SENCA, but that opportunity
was not available at the study session, nor now.
In answer to question by Council , City Manager stated
the final report has not been delivered, however,
there is a question as to how much of the information
should remain confidential , and it is not known yet
what, if any, of the report falls into that category;
that a draft has been completed, and verbal conclusions
were giver, to the Council .
Mr. Luchetti stated that it was his understanding
that there was no feasibility study; that he asked
for it, and was told that it did not exist; and that
one was not done.
g) Sid Phillips, 234 Lei Drive, stated his opinion that
there is a noticeable erosion of confidence in the
legislators.
h) Dawn Stone urged approval of Item 12.
MAYOR DECLARED A RECESS, and business resumed upon reconvening.
LEGISLATIVE ACTION:
Council Minutes
10-19-88 Page 8
5. AA 3.0259 (MATZNER PROPERTY) CHEROSKE APPEAL
On October 5, 1988, Council continued consideration of
appeal by Robert. Cheroske, from Planning Commission decision
concerning addition to increase guest parking and guest
house patio area at 555 Patencio Road, pending a field
trip.
Councilmember Apfelbaum stated that she would abstain
from discussion and voting (appearance of conflict).
Planning Director reported that this matter was scheduled
for the last meeting, and continued to permit a field
trip for observations by the Council ; that the Council
had the written report before it; that there were a series
of letters, the most recent of which he received this
date and which was also directed to the Council , from
Kip Lyons, attorney for Matzner; that the appeal is by
an affected adjacent property owner on an architectural
approval for altering the grading of a hillside to allow
increased guest parking; that the Planning Commission
recommended approval on a 3-2-12••0 vote; that there has
been a lot of verbiage back and forth; that Cheroske's
letter indicates concerns about safety, a 12-foct wide
driveway, and blocking of the driveway if cars are not
properly parked, and concerns about aesthetics; that a
lot of concerns appear to be civil matters between the
two property owners; that the architectural approval was
recommended by the Commission, subject to seven conditions,
detailed in his report; that the opportunity was provided
for the Council to visit the site; that the matter was
not listed on the public hearings agenda, but if the Council
had questions, parties on both sides were present; and
he displayed exhibits of the area in question.
It was moved by Neel , seconded by Broich, ar.d unanimously
carried, Apfelbaum abstaining, that the appeal be denied,
and that the Planning Commission's action be upheld.
6. VAR. 6.361 - MARINO APPEAL
On October 5, 1988, Council continued consideration of
appeal of Alba and Salvatore Marino from Planning Commission
denial of a variance to reduce rear and side yards for
an addition to a residence at 1160 E1 Alameda, pending
building inspection.
Building & Safety Director reviewed the supplemental (146)
memorandum of Director of Community Development, in detail ,
describing conditions recommended to correct construction
inadequacies if the variance is to be granted. In answer
to question by Council , he stated that remaining structures
also constructed in the setback meet code, with one
exception concerning a kitchen which is being followed.
Councilmember Broich moved to grant the variance, subject
to the recommendations of the Building & Safety Director.
City Attorney pointed out that State law requires that
four specific findings (see Director's report) are required
to be made before granting a variance, which he reviewed.
Council Minutes
10-19-88 Page 9
6. VAR. 6.361 (Continued)
Councilmember Foster stated that there are other properties
with six foot setbacks, and probably with garages within
five feet, however, there are so many violations involved,
it will be expensive and difficult to correct.
It was moved by Foster, seconded by Broich, and unanimously
carried, that the appeal be denied, and that the Planning
Commission decision be upheld.
7. AIRPORT LOOP RCAD - CHANGE ORDER NO. 2
Recomrrendation: That the Council approve Change Order
No. 2 to increase contract with Matich Corporation by
$44,379.92, for construction of the Airport Loop Road
(A2560, AIP-08).
Director of Aviation & Energy reviewed his report, and
noted that concerning Item 4 in the Change Order, the
item was manufactured at the time of bid, but then
discontinued, and that a larger and better fountain pumF
pit top has been found.
Minute Order 4267 approving CO #2, as recommended, was (51)
presented; after which, it was moved by Foster, seconded
by Broich, and unanimously carried, that MO 4267 be adopted.
8. AIRPORT - AIRPORT PARK PLAZA
Recommendation: That the Council approve a 50-year lease
with Peacock-Radaker Corporation for the center parcel
of the Airport Park Plaza.
Item withdrawn from agenda.
9. MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENT - CURFEW
Recommendation: That the Council amend the Municipal
Code concerning curfew, to bring the code in line with
recent court decision (returning home from an event, such
as a meeting, entertainment, or dance. ) (103)
Police Chief highlighted his report, and noted the recent
court cases involving this subject.
City Clerk read title of the Ordinance, as follows:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA,
SECTION 11. 56.010 OF THE PALM SPRINGS MUNICIPAL CODE
TO PERMIT A PERSON UNDER 18 YEARS OF AGE TO BE ON THE
PUBLIC STREETS DURING CURFEW HOURS WHEN RETURNING HOME
FROM AN EVENT.
It was moved by Broich, seconded by Foster, and unanimously
carried, that further reading be waived, and that the
Ordinance be introduced for first reading.
10. INTERIM i.ONING ORDINANCE
Recomrrendation: That the Council extend the interim zoning
ordinance which precludes certain uses from being approved
in a portion of the North Palm Canyon Project Area .
Item to be scheduled for public hearing - withdrawn from
agenda.
Council Minutes
10-19-88 Page 10
11. CONVENTION CENTER PARKING CONCESSION
Recommendation: That the Council authorize an agreement
with Resort Parking Services, to provide parking services
at the Convention Center, for one year with option to
renew for three additional one year terms.,
Director of Convention Center highlighted his report;
and in answer I question by Council , the stated that the ( L39)
higher rate recommended for special everts would apply
perhaps 2-3 per year; and is a means of accruing additional
revenue, in those instances when the parking is filled
up quickly. He stated the premium can be reduced.
It was the consensus of the Council that $10 for special
events was too high, and that the amount should be $5,
which would be the same for trade shows.
Minute Order 4268 authorizing agreement, subject to reducing
the special event rate to $5 per automobile, was presented;
after which, it was moved by Broich, seconded by Foster,
and unanimously carried, that MO 4268 be adopted.
12. MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENT - EMPLOYEE REGISTRATION (Intro 10-5-88)
a) City Clerk read title cf Ordinance 1312, repealing
employee registration provisions; after which, it
was moved by Broich, seconded by Foster, and unanimously (103)
carried, that 'further reading be waived, and that
01312 be adopted.
13. PALM SPRINGS CLASSIC
Recommendation: That the Council suspend agreement with
SENCA; approve an agreement between SENCA and Karter
Corporation; and provide direction on land uses, concerning
the Palm Springs Classic project, east of Gene Autry Trail .
Mayor stated that more review on this matter is needed,
and it should be continued.
City Manager stated that since there was not a study session
prior to the meeting, there was not an opportunity for
clarification.
It was moved by Broich, seconded by Foster, and unanimously
carried, that the matter be continued to the next meeting.
ADDITIONAL LEGISLATIVE ITEMS:
14. A.D. 154 - UNDERGROUNC UTILITIES FOUR AREAS
Recommendation: That the Council adept resolutions to
determine sufficiency of petition, make certain
appointments, including approving an agreement with Brown
& Diven as legal counsel , and adopting a boundary map
for undergrounding utilities in four different areas of (56)
the City; design and administration of the project to
be done by Southern California Edison.
Director of Community Development reviewed his report.
Resolutions 16607, 16608 and 16609 as recommended, were
presented; after which, it was moved by Apfelbaum, seconded
by Foster, and unanimously carried, that Resolutions 16607
through 16609 be adopted.
Council Minutes f;,T _I
10-19-82 Page 11
CONSENT:
15. MO 4269 approving letter agreement with the School District
for fulltime police officer services on the High School Campus, (126)
during the 1988-89 school year - Agr #2627.
16. Res 16601 amending the Comprehensive Fee Schedule to amend
fees for fingerprinting, and concealed weapon permits, to
provide that same shall be at the current cost to the City (114)
(charged by the State) plus $3 per fee.
17. MO 4270 approving purchase of two 1-ton cab and chassis trucks
from Marshall Motor Cars, for $24,356.68. (84)
18. MO 4271 awarding bid for purchase of softballs for league
play to Chick's Sporting Goods, at $46. 56 per dozen for either (84)
12-inch or 11-inch softballs.
19. Res 16602, 16603, and 16604 approving Payroll Warrants and (86)
Claims $ Demands.
20. MO 4272 awarding contract for application of slurry seal and
restriping on portions of Avenida Caballeros, Camino Real ,
Mesquite Avenue, Paseo El Mirador, Sunny Dunes, Via Escuela, (136)
and Murray Canyon - CP88-43, to California Pavement Maintenance
Co. , for $15,368.00 - Agr #2629.
21. Res 16605 supporting passage of Prop. 79 on the November ballot,
regarding funding for school construction and reconstruction. (98)
22. Res 16606 increasing the amount of gross income which can
be earned in order to qualify for exemption from the utility (140)
user tau to $11,OCO for individuals, and $14,000 for households.
It was moved by Neel , seconded by Apfelbaum, and unanimously
carried, that Resolutions 16601 through 16606 and Minute
Orders 4269 through 4272 be adopted.
23. CDBG PRCJECT - CROSSLEY TRACT STREET IMPROVEMENTS
Recommendation: That the Council approve agreement with
the Holt Group for engineering design for drainage and
street improvements in the Crossley Tract, for $15,444,
Agr #2628.
In answer to question by Council , Director o„ Community
Development stated that the firm is qualified, has many (85)
years of experience, and includes full engineering services.
MO 4273, approving agreement as recommended, was presented;
after which, it was moved by Broich, seconded by Foster,
and unanimously carried, that MO 4273 be &dopted.
ADDED STARTERS : (Eligibility for consideration determined upon
unanimous approval , after motion by Apfelbaum, seconded by Foster) )
24. PRCP 99
City Manager reported that a request was received at the
last meeting for the Council to endorse passage of
Prcposition 99 on the November ballot; that the Council (98)
directed it be considered at this meeting; that the matter
was inadvertently omitted from the agenda, but for any
action to have meaning prior to the election, it should
be taker at this time.
Council Minutes
10-19-88 Page 12
24. PROP 99 (Continued)
Counci ]member Apfelbaum stated that she objected to using
the initiative process in-lieu of requiring accountability
of government officials, more than she has concerns about
the specific resolution.
It was moved by Apfelbaum, seconded) by Broich, and
unanimously carried, that no position be taken on this
measure.
REPOPTS & REQUESTS:
25. CITY COUNCIL reports or requests - None
26. PUBLIC reports or requests - Nor.e
27. STAFF reports or requests
a) Vintage Race Rails: Director of Aviation and Energy
stated that construction is proceeding rapidly, and
it is fast beccming necessary to find a place to park
the rails for the race, and he would like to begin
placing them on the race route, once the insurance
is effective; that there would not be any blocking
of driveways: or fire hydrants; that they will be stored
in the future on the east side of the Airport.
Councilmember Foster stated that he was not sympathetic, ( )
and it was a month before the race, ar.d a long time
to have them on the streets.
It was the consensus of the Council to place one,
and let. the Council see what it looks like.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, Mayor declared the meeting
adjourned.
JUDITH SUMICH
City Clerk