Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout10/27/1987 - MINUTES I 0-1 CITY OF PALM SPRINGS CITY COUNCIL MINUTES OCTOBER 27, 1987 An Adjourned Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Palm Springs, was called to order by Mayor Bogert, in the Large Conference Room, City Hall , 3200 Tahquitz-McCallum Way, on Tuesday, October 27, 1987, at 3 p.m. ROLL CALL: Present: Councilmembers Apfelbaum, Birer, Foster, Smith and Mayor Bogert Absent: None PUBLIC COMMENTS: (See Item 1) LEGISLATIVE ACTION: 1. C.U.P. 5.0451 - ALEXANDER COLER - ILA STEDEM APPEA@. Consideration of appeal by Ila Stedem from Planning Commis- sion approval of lighting an existing tennis court at 555 Via Monte Vista, was continued from October 21, pending field trips by Councilmembers. Joyce Ellis, daughter of Ila Stedem, stated that her mother is quite elderly and wants to spend her remaining life in peace and quiet; that she learned this weekend that the Coler residence is for sale, and that any question about the tennis court lighting should be resolved so any buyer would be aware of the decision. Donna Gordon, 755 Crescent, presented photographs showing the relationship of the Coler residence and golf course to her home, and stated that she opposes the direction — of play on the course. She also stated that her home has suffered multiple broken windows, and she has had to go to considerable expense to protect her windows. Stanley Avison, 611 Dry Falls Road, stated that he previously sent correspondence (to the Planning Commission), concerning the lights, and submitted a letter regarding (78) sale of the property. Assistant City Manager reported that the master had been continued to allow Councilmembers to visit the site at night; and that the Council had requested a report on the golf course and final landscaping plans. He stated that the hearing was closed. City Attorney stated that if additional matters are received and considered by the Council in connection with the hearing, an examination of them should be made available to Mr. Coler, but his absence at the meeting would not preclude the Council for taking final action, since he was aware of the continuance to this date. Planning Director reiterated the Planning Commission's approval , and stated that a time limit for play on the courts would be appropriate; that Mr. Coler proceeded with the installation of the lights because of his desire not to remove landscaping at a future date; that the degree of lighting observed on the field trip would probably be tempered somewhat by the growth of the trees, and the dark colored final surface to be applied to the courts, and might be further reduced by a net windscreen, as well as a baffle on the edge of the "shoebox" lampshades. Council Minutes 081 10-27-87 Page 2 1. C.U.P - COLEIY (Continued) He stated that the curfew would be enforced on a complaint basis, and ultimately through compliance procedures of the use permit process. Councilmember Smith stated that the bulk of the glare seems to stem from the reflection off the court:; and also questioned if conditions of approval of the lights could be imposed to resolve the golf course concerns. Planning Director stated that the golf course could be addressed independently. He also stated that the applicant stated that the lights could be shielded, buy lie has not seen plans to that effect, nor do plans call for a wind screen or a fence. Councilman 8irer stated that he did not think the light was very objectionable; that a time curfew OF 10 p.m. , would minimize the impact on the neighborhood; that there is a certain amount of reflection on the hillside, but he did not consider it objectionable; and that the project is less noisy than that which could be caused by forty homes which could have been built on the same size parcel . In answer to question by Council , Planning Director reported that there are a few lights on the back of the guest house, but made little difference in terms of hillside reflection when they were turned off. Councilmember Apfelbaum stated that she found 'he lighting ' as it is to be very objectionable, and she was now convinced that it will disappear after the courts are painted; and that she is concerned as to the number of neighbors who are opposed, and that neither the AAC nor bhe Planning Commission were unanimous in their approvals. Mr. Coler stated that the golf course seems to cloud the tennis court lighting issue; that he curreni-Ay has two homes for sale, and after whichever sells first, he will move into the other; that the golf course is a private, three-hole course; that he believes most of the lighting on the hillside can be eliminated, and painting the court surface will eliminate it; that he is willing to install shades over the lights at this time and lei anyone see it later; that he will shade the portion of the light which appears below the shoebox fixture; and re-explained his reason for installing the lights prior to approval . He questioned if he would be permitted to have the lights for other than tennis court lighting purposes, e.g. , enter- taining. Councilmember Smith stated that the shading and painting the court should eliminate the objections, iwwever, his main concern is noise, and lights would allow playing all night, and a 10 p.m. curfew would limit the noise ' factor for the neighbors. Planning Director stated that the use permit runs with the land, although it is not recorded, it is considered passed from owner to owner, unless specifically stated that it is not transferable; that most night-lighted courts are seldom used; that if the application is denied, the lights would have to be removed, and any lighting on the property would have to be approved. E)�) Council Minutes 10-27-87 Page 3 1. C.U.P. - COLER (Continued) Mr. Coler noted that a full disclosure is required at the time of sale of real property; and that he is willing to install netting if errant golf balls are a problem. Councilmember Birer stated that he does not always look to unanimity on the Planning Commission or any other board; and would support the approval of the lights, under condi- tions. It was moved by Birer, seconded by Smith, and carried by the following vote, that the appeal be denied, and that the Planning Commission decision be upheld, subject to additional conditions that a 10 p.m. curfew be imposed; that additional shading on the shoeboxes be required; and that the Staff study the golf course issue to see what if any changes should be made in terms of tee loca- tions, and proximity to neighbors, and report back to the Council in that regard: AYES: Birer, Foster, Smith and Bogert NO: Apfelbaum ABSENT: None 2. CONVENTION CENTER DRAPERIES Recommendation: That the Council award contract for the purchase and installation of draperies at the Convention Center, estimated at $26,000. (139) Assistant City Manager stated 'that this matter was not ready for consideration, and was withdrawn from the Agenda. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business at 3:35 p.m. , Mayor declared the meeting adjourned. ` _JUDITIiSUMICH City Clerk t