HomeMy WebLinkAbout10/21/1987 - MINUTES i
CITY OF PALM SPRINGS
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
OCTOBER 21, 1987
A Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Palm Springs, _
was called to order by Mayor Bogert, in the Council Chambers,
3200 Tahquitz-McCallum Way, on Wednesday, October 21, 1987, at
7:30 p.m.
ROLL CALL: Present: Councilmembers Apfelbaum, Birer, Foster,
Smith and Mayor Bogert
Absent: None
REPORT OF POSTING OF AGENDA:
Report of Acting City Clerk: Agenda posted in accordance
with Council policy on September 16, 1987.
PRESENTATION: Red Ribbon Week
Janine Paquette, Police Department School Resource Officer
and Drug Abuse Resistance Education (DARE) instructor,
presented a Red Ribbon to Chief Kendra, thanked Mayor Bogert (74)
for proclaiming October 25 through October 31, 1987, as
Red Ribbon Week and stated that the Californians for Drug
Free Youth and the California Department of Alcohol and
Drug Abuse Program also support the second annual Red Ribbon
Week. She introduced the following student representatives
who presented ribbons to the City Council : --
1. Ernje Graciano, Raymond Cree Middle School ;
2. Tony Petee, Cahuilla Elementary;
3. Shannon Hickey, Katherine Finchy Elementary;
4. Charlie Evans, Cielo Vista Elementary;
5. Jeremy Merrick,Vista Del Monte Elementary.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
It was moved by Birer,seconded by Apfelbaum, and unanimously
carried, that the Minutes of August 18, September 2, 8,
22, 30 and October 7, 1987, be approved.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1. C.U.P. 5.0451 - ALEXANDER COLER - ILA STEDEM APPEAL
Recommendation: That Council consider the appeal by Ila
Stedem from Planning Commission approval of lighting an
existing tennis court at 555 Via Monte Vista.
(78)
Planning Director stated that this matter was reviewed in
study session; that the appeal is from night lighting of
a tennis court adjacent to the Tachevah Dam Floodway; that
Planning Commission based its approval on the court's location
against a hillside and dam, and its distance from surrounding
properties. He stated that Mrs. Stedem based the appeal
on the noise, night lighting, and construction; and that
some adjacent properties also oppose the C.U.P. ; that the
applicant connected the electricity for Council 's inspection
Council Minutes
10-21-87, Page 2
1. C.U.P. 5.0451 - ALEXANDER COLER - ILA STEDEM APPEAL (Continued)
of the lighting; that significant complaints have not been
received on night-lighted tennis courts for many years,
even though they are approved periodically; that Planning
Commission approved the shoebox type light fixtures, as
opposed to the court light fixtures, due to the 180 foot
distance of the court from surrounding properties, and
research has indicated that shoebox fixtures have a 60-foot
cast of light.
Mayor declared the hearing open.
The following people spoke in favor of the project:
Alexander Coler stated that, in his opinion, the lights
should be permitted. lie stated that neither the tennis
courts nor the lights would disturb anyone because of their
relationship to surrounding properties; that the property
is zoned for 20,000 square foot lots, or over 30 houses,
and his development has created the best possible situation
for the neighbors, and that the neighbor's children to the
south create a disturbance with their rock music. He stated
that, contrary to Mrs. Stedem's claim, there is no easement
between the properties and it is not zoned as a flood control
area, and the property has adequate drainage from west to
' east. He stated that lights were installed without a permit,
since the finished landscape would have made it difficult
to get equipment close enough to install the lighting, and
he was willing to take a risk on approval ; and that the
cabinets are permitted items in the guest house, and cooking
fixtures have not been installed. He stated that lighting
was connected for Council inspection on the evening of October
20, and that the watchman had stated that the area was dark
75 to 100 feet away from the tennis courts, even with the
lights on. He stated that the Tennis Club has a number
of lighted courts. He stated that Sam Gordon, 755 Crescent
Drive, wrote in support of the project; that prior to
construction of the home, he was disturbed by coyotes on
the vacant property and unsightly piles of junk; that he
did not understand why the tennis courts would annoy neighbors
since they are located 180 feet from the nearest property
line; that the tennis court should be allowed; and that
he has done much for the neighborhood and the entire
community.
Ethel Hunt stated that her home is closest to the Coler
residence, and the majority of neighbors are pleased with
the Coler residence, and it has increased property value,
and eliminated the coyotes; that she enjoys the noise of
people having fun, and that tennis probably would be played
at night only a few times; that the lights are beautiful
against the mountain; and, in her opinion, the noise cannot
be heard; and that she requested approval of the lights.
o y ...
Council Minutes
10-21-87, Page 3
1. C.UoP. 5.0451 - ALEXANDER COLER - ILA STEDEM APPEAL (Continued)
Diane Stone staged that Robert Cheroske, 575 Patencio Road,
requested her to present his opinion, stating that his home
overlooks the Coler development and Mr. Coler should be
congratulated for upgrading the City with an outstanding
development; that it is unreasonable that anyone could find
the lighting of the courts objectionable; that the lighting
will allow him to see the golf course which gives the
impression of a park-like setting, and he regrets they will
be on only occasionally; and that he supports the Coler's
right to light the court.
Harold Metzner, 555 North Patencio, stated that he welcomes
what Mr. Coler has done to property values in the area;
that he did not understand why an objection would be made
after an investment of millions of dollars; in a single family
project, when a commercial route could) have been taken,
and Mr. Coler could have obtained multiple occupancy profit;
and he urged Council approval .
Mr. Hunt, 605 Crescent Drive, stated that his residence
is the lowest in the neighborhood; that: the lighting only
reflects and does not light the entire mountain; that he
is pleased that the neighborhood and view have been enhanced;
that he requested the letter that he sent previously to '
the City from San Francisco be made a part of the record;
and that he is in favor of the lighting.
Alexander Coler stated that the hillside is part of his
property, and the lighting is very attractive and only
reflects a short distance, and requested that Council view
the lighting; that even with the trees planted, most of
the mountain can be seen, and when the trees are fully
grown, they will block most of the lighting; and that only
30 to 40 feet of the hillside i s lit. Fie stated that staff
indicated that the golf course was allowable if landscaping
plans were presented; that only permitted items were installed
in the kitchen, but the stove has not been connected until
approval is obtained; that lighting was installed previous
to obtaining a permit since it was impossible to get acrane
into the area due to the landscaping; that he anticipated
acceptance of the project, because of the unusual conditions
and distance of the court from any adjoining property; and
that if any damage occurs due to the golf course, his
insurance would be responsible.
The following people spoke in opposition:
Joyce Ellis, Ila Stedem's daughter, stated that at the study
session staff indicated that usually, if neighbors object, '
permits are not granted for lighted tennis courts; that
she objects to the lighted courts because of noise, that
the area between her home and Mr. Coler's is barren except
for the eucalyptus trees; that in the past the hill area
was used for climbing, playing, or riding motorcycles, and
created noise which bounced from the hills into her yard;
that if the tennis courts are lit, tennis would be played
at night; and that many residents in they area are concerned
about golf balls in their yards.
Council Minutes
10-21-87, Page 4
1. C.U.P. 5.0451 - ALEXANDER COLER - ILA STEDEM APPEAL (Continued)
Stanley Avison, 611 Dry Falls Road, stated that one reason
he moved to the City was the environmental control the City
has had over the years in maintaining a natural setting;
that installing the lights will destroy the view of the
mountains from his property; that the lighting wil create
activity and the noise at night will echo off the mountain;
that he has no objection to Mr. Coler' s development, which
is beautiful and increases property value, but that he objects
to the lighting which, in his opinion, appears to be a
violation of the building code. He stated that a building
permit normally is required and Mr. Coler is asking to be
forgiven for violating the rules; and that his primary concern
is that the lighting of the courts will destroy the natural
beauty of the mountain side.
Shirley Hammer, 677 Dry Falls Road, stated that, in her
opinion, many neighbors do not know about the lighting of
the tennis court; that she thinks everyone is pleased with
the beautiful home, but that she is opposed to the aesthetics
of lighting the mountain.
Donna Gordon, 755 Crescent Drive, stated that the area has
endured much noise and dust due to construction; that she
does not object to the lights or the possible noise, but
is objecting to finding golf balls in her yard, and that
she was unaware the golf course was located so close to
her property until notice was received on the tennis court
lights. She stated that her home has over $100,000 of stained
glass windows, which have had to be additionally protected;
that she has known Mrs. Stedem over twenty years, and she
has never had any problem with neighbors.
There being no further appearances the hearing was closed.
Planning Director stated that the landscape plans include
lighting, and that lighting of the mountainside will be
further reviewed; that if there is a problem, the matter
could be returned to the Planning Commission; and a final
inspection has not been made. In answer to questions by
Council he stated that the area is basically a single family
landscape plan, and not a golf course, and that Mr. Coler
could stipulate to a hold harmless agreement to protect
the City against suit.
Councilmember Apfelbaum stated that the Council fosters
protection of the natural environment and the hillsides,
and that she had viewed the lighting, and was shocked by
its brightness; that the light is intrusive; that the area
is rustic and rural , and she does not think that it is an
area which needs to be lit, and is a betrayal of some of
the values of the City.
Council Minutes
10-21-87, Page 5
1. C.U.P. 5.0451 - ALEXANDER COLER - ILA STEDEM APPEAL (Continued)
Councilmember Smith stated that considerable time has been
spent on architectural approvals in terms of the aesthetics,
that the original intent was to protect neighbors, and if
complaints were received, the policy was not to allow the
lighting; that the home does improve the property value,
which would not be reduced if the lighting were not approved;
that the only issue is whether Council will allow the
lighting, and that he did not support lighting unless the
neighborhood is 100% in favor.
After further discussion, it was the concensus of Council
that the site should be viewed at night, that staff should
provide a report to Council on the golf course and on the
circumstances of its approval .
It was moved by Birer, seconded by Foster, and unanimously
carried, that the matter be continued to October 27, at
3 p.m. , in the Large Conference Room.
Assistant City Manager stated that Council would view the
lights at Mr. Coler's property October 22, 1987, between
7:00 to 10:00 p.m.
Director of Community Development stated that landscape
lighting should be reviewed independent of the tennis court ,
lighting, which is the subject of the C.U.P. , which might
be the problem, and they should be considered separately.
2. P.D. 191 - CROWE
Recommendation: That the Council approve Preliminary Planned
Development District 191 in-lieu of a zone change to R-4,
to allow the development of a 345-room, high rise hotel ,
including restaurant, lounge, meeting rooms, health club,
and tennis facilities, on property located on the northeast (116)
corner of South Palm Canyon Drive and Mesquite Avenue, Section
23.
Planning Director reviewed staff reportt and stated that
the project differs from the previously proposed projects;
that the previous plan had an open horseshoe shaped building
with 310 units, and opened onto Random Road. lie stated
that it is a high-rise structure by definition; that the
proposals have changed on the basis of the involvement of
hotel operators with the proposed plan and program; that
the first plan had all underground parking and the second
proposal had all surface parking, but that this proposal
is a parking management plan, with a good deal of valet,
tandem parking -in the northwest corner of the site, one
which staff thinks is more workable. He stated that it
is under the allowable density; that it is a higher building
than before with over 50% open space, which generally meets
the setback standards, but in a few instances it is not
in compliance with setback requirements. He stated that
the Russell Wade property is not a part. of the project at
this time, but one condition of approval is that it would
Council Minutes
10-21-87, Page 6
2. P.D. 191 - CROWE (Continued)
be prior to the planned development being finalized. He
reviewed elevations, access, valet parking, and recreation
area, including the tennis courts abutting the Tahquitz
Creek area, and stated that the City is working with the
Flood Control District on the necessary recreation and access
easements. He stated that there is a pump system for water
drainage, and that the view of the entire mountainside would
not be blocked. Upon questioning by Council , he stated
the density does not comply with terms of the revised
ordinance; that the guidelines were altered after the proposal
was submitted; that the new ordinance requires 60% open
space and this project has 50% open space, which does not
include any of the decorative paving work Planning Commission
sometimes allows, but typically parking and paving are not
counted as open space; that the proposal does not meet the
75% underground parking requirement, which is a new
requirement; and that a portion of the strucsvure does not
meet the 6:1 setback requirement. He stated that the planned
development district would provide conceptual approval only,
to create the building envelope, the building mass, the
density and intensity of the building of the site, and is
consistent with procedures; that the Planning Commission
and Council will have final review of all the development
plans; that at this point Mr. Crowe has tenta'cively aligned
' with the Sheraton Group; that Mr. Crowe could have requested
an extension for the previously submitted plan, but wanted
to present this plan, and staff recommends approval ; and
that the project is in a redevelopment area, and there is
some financing at stake by the end of the year. He stated
that in the past the applicant has had an option to acquire
the property from Mr. Wade but the option expired, and
the powers of redevelopment to acquire that property have
not been invoked, but that might happen later; that the
applicant believes he can work with Mr. Wade to acquire
the property.
Councilmember Birer stated that he has reservations about
the size of the project, but it would be a better use for
the area than a commercial center.
Mayor declared the hearing open.
Director of Redevelopment stated that the applicant is working
on financing; that it is an extremely important project,
and could be a keystone for the South Palm Canyon
Redevelopment area; that the applicant has been trying to
work with a high-quality concept, and has been working with
Staff and the Planning Commission to modify any of their
concerns; that Mr. Crowe does not have the money to purchase
' Mr. Wade' s property on speculation, but anticipates completing
the final negotiations with Mr. Wade, once he has obtained
financing; that redevelopment powers to acquire the property
should not be needed; that Mr. Crowe is still working with
the Bank of America on some finance problems which should
be resolved when financing is completed; and that, in his
opinion, the project is very significant for the City.
Paul Lighthill , representative of First Church of Christ
Scientists, 605 Riverside Drive South, stated that the church
has approximately 200 feet fronting on Random Road; that
the project would be important to the City, and the Church
,101
Council Minutes
10-21-87 , Page 7
2. P.D. 191 - CROWE (Continued)
would like to see it go ahead, and does not want to put
any roadblocks in the way of the project, but that there
are two concerns expressed by the membership: 1) that the
overall mass of the project could be overwhelming when viewed
against the mountainside, and it could have a penitentiary
rather than a harmonious look; 2) that the tennis courts
are close to the Church, and would create noise, and the
Church is requesting the courts either be relocated another
50 or 75 feet to the west, or that the end of the court
be omitted.
The following people spoke in opposition:
Hildie Weaver, owner of property on the corner of Random
Road and Mesquite Avenue, stated that she would not have
improved her property if she had known a highrise was to
be built; that the property would be over-built, the building
is too tall , and she does not think Palm Springs wants that
type of image; that 365 hotel rooms would) be approximately
1,500 cars, and employees would have to park around the
outside of the project, where there is no room; that the
view of the mountains from her property would be obstructed,
and the lights, noise and parking would reduce the value
of her property substantially; and that the inlet for the
parking is on the corner of Random Road and Mesquite Avenue,
and cars would be active day and night. '
Planning Director stated that the proposed parking program
meets parking code; that the hotel staff would tend to park
outside the property due to the location of the staff
entrances although there is an area in the back of the hotel
that would be convenient only to staff; that the tendency
is for some employees to use public transportation to reduce
some of the parking problem, but that some kind of parking
program could be worked out with the Police 'Department.
Bill Drury, owner of the Random House, 641 San Lorenzo Road,
stated that he was disappointed to hear that the building
would be sixty feet, when the Planning Commission had agreed
to fifty feet; that the building would block the view of
the mountains from his hotel ; that the property needs to
be improved, but that he would like to see it improved under
the City guidelines; that he has doubts about the ability
of the applicant to obtain financing, and questioned why
taxpayers should pay for the demolition, which should be
paid for by the applicant.
There being no further appearances, the hearing was closed.
Director of Redevelopment stated that the City has put up '
the money for the demolition but that a lien has been placed
against Mr. Crowe to reimburse the City; that in most nuisance
cases a lien is placed against a property, but since the
Bank of America also has some control of the property, staff
thinks placing a lien against Mr. Crowe is a better
alternative; that Mr. Crowe is a developer of smaller
property, and has not developed a project of this size before,
but that he has joint ventured on this project with Py-Vavra
from Madison, Wisconsin, a group which develops hotels.
0�
Council Minutes
10-21-87, Page 8
2. P.D. 191 - CROWE (Continued)
' In answer to Council questions, Planning Director stated
that the exterior has always been three to four stories;
that originally, the highest element of the project was
a roof -top restaurant which was approved, but the design
was later deleted; that the project looks more massive since
more rooms have been added, which increased the area, and
that previously there was additional landscaping. He stated
that a building directly facing the street looks more massive
than when it faces a street diagionally, and creates a
recession of the building mass from the street, but that
is not to say that the building would not have a large mass
when completed. He stated that the Planning Commission
and Council will have to decide what is architecturally
pleasing; that these are just mass studies with architectural
delineation, and that any concerns could be passed on to
the Planning Commission and Architectural Advisory Committee,
if Council approves the project; that the Planning Commission
Chairman suggested salvaging the masonry walls, which were
fine examples of masonry; that concept approval is
transferable, and approval is specifically site oriented;
that Council would have significant latitude over the
architectural characteristics and the height of the buildings,
which have not yet been resolved, and to make any other
conditions it wishes for further review.
City Attorney stated that Council would have a degree of
control relating to the architectural characteristics and
heights of the building.
Redevelopment Director stated that if the number of units
were changed, it could change financing, and result in
terminating the project; that it needs to determine whether
the project is to continue. He stated than the Council
can control architectural modifications and later could
ask for further renderings and details.
Councilmember Smith stated that each time the Council approves
a project of this type, the code is deviated from, and
questioned when the Council would return to a situation
where a project is deemed to have met the code requirements.
Planning Director stated that the project is in a tenuous
position, because it was reworked and submitted before the
new ordinance; that under the new ordinance, standards for
highrises are guidelines, and since potential sites would
be few, and there would be a need for adjustments ; and that
staff could further study that issue; that each project
is unique, which is one of the reasons the planned development
district procedure versus a C.U.P. was adopted for the
highrise projects; that a planned development is a flexible,
guideline process, as opposed to a rigid ordinance process
of specific standards. Upon questioning by Council , he
stated that some employees do take public transportation,
go to work in groups, and work shifts; that the hotel has
about 120 parking spaces in the back area, mainly for employee
parking, and that there are other parking areas on the site;
and that a condition of approval could be that the hotel
would work with the staff regarding its employee parking
plan, and that parking would not impact the neighborhood.
i
Council Minutes
10-21-87, Page 9
2. P.D. 191 - CROWE (Continued)
Councilmember Foster stated that it should be clearly '
understood that the Council is not approving the architectural
aspects, and the matter will be reviewed by the Planning
Commission, and the City Council .
Councilmember Smith stated that although the applicant has
tried for some time to start the project, he could not approve
the project since, in his opinion, the Council should draw
a line, and make a decision about its goals and where the
community is going; that right now the City is going from
project to project, and he would not like to establish that
another project of this type would be approved in the future.
Resolution 16317 approving Plannned Development District
191 for Palm Canyon Plaza, Ltd. , for a resort hotel on South
Palm Canyon, was presented; after which, it was moved by
Birer, seconded by Bogert, and carried by the following
vote, that Resolution 16317 be adopted:
AYES: Apfelbaum., Birer, Foster and Mayor (Bogert
NOES: Smith
ABSENT: None
Acting City Clerk read title of Ordinance, as follows:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA,
AMENDING THE ZONING MAP BY APPROVING A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
DISTRICT IN-LIEU OF A CHANGE OF ZONE FOR A RESORT HOTEL
DEVELOPMENT ON SOUTH PALM CANYON DRIVIEE/MESQUITE AVENUE,
SECTION 23.
It was moved by Birer, seconded by Foster, and unanimously
carried, that further reading be waived; and, it was moved
by Birer, seconded by Foster, and carried) by the following
vote, that the Ordinance be introduced for first reading:
AYES: Apfelbaum, Birer, Foster and Mayor
Bogert
NOES: Foster
ABSENT: None
PUBLIC COMMENTS
a) George Goldberg, P.O. Box 4156, stated that Palm Springs
is a City with double standards. He stated that his
vehicle, parked in front of his home for only 16 hours,
had been ticketed as an unattended vehicle, and that
after speaking with the police, he was left with an
impression that he would continue to be under
surveillance; and that he now believes the Council is '
correct in reducing the police force via attrition.
He questioned spending funds in Cathedral City for copy +
reproduction that could have been dome in Palm Springs,
that an excess of money was spent at the Staff retreat,
and for police services during Easter Week, and that
the City is spending funds on illegal landscaping design.
Council Minutes
10-21-87, Page 10
' ADDITIONAL LEGISLATIVE MATTERS - None
CONSENT AGENDA
3. MO 4044 approving cooperative agreements for cost reimbursement
of wildland fire suppression operations, with the Department (144)
of Interior, Bureau of Land Management and Bureau of Indian
Affairs - Agr #2506 and #2507.
4. Res 16318 approving amendments to the 1986-87 budget to provide (61)
authorization for expenditures which exceeded the final adopted
budget, total of $67,371.
5. MO 4045 awarding purchase of two parking control vehicles (84)
to Electric Car Distributors, for $16,029.32.
6. Res 16319 adopting updated Comprehensive Fee Schedule,
incorporating all amendments approved by the City Council (114)
from 1979 to date, and rescinding Resolution 13189, and
amendments thereto.
7. Res 16320 approving change of street name from Cerritos Road
to Pavilion Drive, for portion from Baristo Road terminating (135)
in cul-de-sac which serves as access to the Pavilion, Swim
' Complex and the P.S. High School back parking lot.
8. MO 4046 appointing Dale Hardenburg to serve two year term
as the Palm Springs representative on the Inland Library System (60)
Advisory Board.
9. MO 4047 awarding contract to Sunair Paving Company, Inc. ,
for cross gutter and miscellaneous street drainage repairs, (129)
for $71,563.30, and waive minor irregularity regarding
timeliness of signed addendum which does not effect contract
cost, CP 86-12, Agr #2508.
10. MO 4048 accepting proposal from Engineering Consulting Services
(ECS) to develop a central air conditioning plant master plan (51 C/D)
for the Airport, for a flat fee of $13,700 - Agr #2509.
11. MO 4049 rejecting bids for temporary parking lot a.t the Airport, (51 C/D)
CP 87-60.
12. Res 1.6321, 16322, and 16323 City companion actions regarding (61)
above CRA Item for loans to Project Areas 7, 8 & 9.
13. Res 16324, 16325, and 16326 approving Payroll Warrants and (86)
Claims & Demands.
14. MO 4050 approving agreement with Nancy Watt for Library public
relations progamming for 1987-88, for $7,500, Agr #2513. (99)
15. MO 4051 approving extension of agreement with Teri Henry,
for Convention Center marketing and sales services, to November (139)
13, 1987, for an additional cost not to exceed $4,300.
16. MO 4052 and MO 4056 approving agreements for purchasing services
with Etta Hartzman, $14.50 per hour/maximum $11,600 - Agr (139)
#2510, and Karen Hall , $13 per hour/maximum $8,320, for the
Convention Center - Agr #2511.
Councul Minutes
10-21-87, Page 11
CONSENT AGENDA (Continued)
17. MO 4053 approving purchase of carpet pad and installation '
of previously purchased carpet for the Convention Center from (139),
Buchholz Carpet Service, Inc. , dba Universal Flooring, for
$45,932, Agr #2512.
18. Motion concurring in CRA actions this date (Resolutions 492
through 493). (124)
19. Res 16327 amending the budget to appropriate an additional
$32,000 to cover facilities maintenance for the Convention (61)
Center.
It was moved by Smith, seconded by Apfelbaum, and unanimously
carried, that Resolutions 16318 through 116327, and Minute
Orders 4044 through 4053, and MO 4056, and motion concurring
in CRA actions, be adopted.
ADDED STARTERS: (Determined eligibiliy for consideration by
unanimous approval at study session. )
20. CONVENTION CENTER - TABLES
Recommendation: That Council approve the purchase of 374
tables for the Palm Springs Convention ,Center from Sico,
Inc. , Minneapolis, in the amount of $96,538.16 per Bid No. (139) ,
CC-8708.
MO 4054 approving purchase of tables, as recommended, was
presented; after which, it was moved by Birer, seconded
by Apfelbaum, and unanimously carried, that 140 4054 be
adopted.
21. CONVENTION CENTER -- LIGHTING FIXTURES
Recommendation: That Council approve the purchase of eighteen
(18) lighting fixtures for the lobby and boardroom of the
Palm Springs Convention Center from La Spec Industries, (139)
Los Angeles, in an amount not to exceed $10,000.
MO 4055 approving the purchase of eighteen lighting fixtures,
as recommended, was presented; after which, it was moved
by Birer, seconded by Apfelbaum, and unanimously carried,
that MO 4055 be adopted.
REPORTS & REQUESTS:
CITY COUNCIL Reports or Requests
a) Councilmember Apfelbaum stated that a letter has been
received by the Council from Revel Young, architect, '
suggesting alternative approaches to zoning for the
Central Business District.
Director of Planning stated that the letter was reviewed
in study session, and the Planning Commission was enthused
about the suggestions of Mr. Young, and it will look
at the revised Zoning Ordinance; and that the staff
recommends reviewing the matter at the next study session.
PUBLIC Reports or Requests - None
i
Council Minutes
10-21-87, Page 12
STAFF Reports or Requests - None
ADJOURNMENT:
City Attorney requested that the meeting be adjourned to
a Closed Session pursuant to Government Code Section
54956.9(a) regarding certain pending litigation, City vs.
All Persons regarding Palm Desert, Docket #51124, and City
vs. All Persons, regarding Indian Wells, Docket 51330.
Thereafter, there being no further business, the meeting
was adjourned to Tuesday, October 27, 1987, at, 3.00 p.m. ,
in the large conference room. ` (/
\ J`DITH !SUM ICH
City Clerk
By: Pkl,IRICIA JONES
Acting City Clerk