HomeMy WebLinkAbout1/3/1984 - MINUTES CITY OF PALM SPRINGS
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
JANUARY 4, 1984
A Regular Meeting of the City Council was called to order by Mayor
Bogert, in the Council Chamber, 3200 Tahquitz-McCallum Way, on Wednes-
day, January 4, 1984, at 7:30 p.m.
ROLL CALL: Present: Councilmembers Doyle, Foster, Maryanov, Smith
& Mayor Bogert
Absent: None
The meeting was opened with the salute to the Flag and a moment of
silence.
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY: Mayor declared the meeting adjourned
for the purpose of convening as the Community Redevelopment Agency;
after which, members reconvened as the City Council .
SWEARING-IN NEW ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONERS:
City Clerk administered oath of office to new Economic Develop-
ment Commissioners, i .e. , Tuck Broich, Robert Flavin, Wanda
Hird, Douglas Patterson, Kurt Ealy, and James Schlecht. Mr.
Russell Beirich, was not in attendance.
Mayor announced the terms for the new commissioners would (60)
be: Broich & Flavin, 6-30-84; Hird & Patterson, 1985; and
Ealy, Schlecht and Beirich, 1986.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
It was moved by Doyle, seconded by Smith, and unanimously
carried, that the minutes of November 23, 30 and December
2, 19 and 21 , 1983 be approved.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1 . ZTA 5.0305 - GR5 BUILDING HEIGHT
Recommendation: That the Council approve amendment to the
Zoning Text to allow increased building height in the GR5
zone.
Director of Community Development distributed alternate proposed
ordinance, which would retain a 15-ft height limit, but include (103)
the additional exceptions, i .e. , governmental facilities,
and requirement for 150-ft setback from a residential zone,
for any structure in excess of 15 ft. , which addressed the
concerns expressed by the Council at the last study session.
Mayor declared the hearing open; there being no appearances,
the hearing was closed.
City Clerk read title of the Ordinance, as amended, as follows:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA,
AMENDING THE GUEST RANCH ZONE TO ALLOW AN INCREASE IN
THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF STRUCTURES.
It was moved by Foster, seconded by Smith, and unanimously
carried, that further reading be waived, and that the
Ordinance be introduced for first reading.
0U2
Council Minutes
1-4-84 Page 2
2. P.D. 150 - PALM CANYON PLAZA, LTD.
Recommendation: That the Council approve planned development
district to construct 310-room hotel , including 60-ft height
on a portion thereof, on property on the NE corner of Mesquite
Avenue and South Palm Canyon Drive.
Planning Director reviewed his report, dated January 4, 1984,
noting that it had been reviewed in considerable detail at
the last study session, and stating that relative to the high-
rise and parking issue, the Planning Commission found that
there is substantial compliance with the Zoning Text, but
it did require an additional 17 parking spaces, and a parking
management plan to be submitted with final development plans ;
that the Commission and Planning Staff concluded that the (116)
amount of highrise building mass would be less obtrusive to
the neighborhood than a C-1 development which would allow
a 30-ft building height up to a 5-ft setback from the property
line; that the proposed highrise is 300 ft from the building
property line; that the site contains 65% open space; that
traffic studies done for project previously proposed on the
site, was re-analyzed and conclusion reached that the hotel
would generate far less than the commercial project; and that
it is not expected that a 1-block widening from the intersection
east, would be helpful , but there will be further evaluation
of this and right-turn only concept. He displayed site plans,
elevations and renderings, and noted employee parking area
contemplated, and stated that how many spaces will be needed,
and where employees will parking will be part of the parking
management plan submitted with the final development plans;
and that 125-140 employee shift count is preliminarily
estimated.
In answer to question by Council , Planning Director stated
that holding to the maximum height limited permitted in the
underlying zone, would result in lost surface space, a spreading
of the units over the site, loss of parking, and loss of
amenities being offered in the project. He stated that the
Planning Commission felt the site was an extension of the
downtown core; is flat; and is not a deviation from the highrise
policy that would cause a precedent that would be regretted
later; and that although it was a deviation, the Planning
Commission strongly endorsed the project.
Mayor declared the hearing open.
Steven Crow, developer, stated that eliminating certain phases
would create a shortfall in their planning time; that he felt
the project was consistent with what the City wanted
accomplished ; that concept of a roof-top restaurant was
suggested by a number of people that such a facility would
be desirable in the Valley; that the restaurant will not exceed
3500 sq. ft. , and will be 300 ft from the property line; that
by right-of-zone, something far more obtrusive to the neighbor-
hood could have been constructed ; and the question of additional
parking will be addressed in the final development plans.
Kevin Boyle, 555 San Lorenzo, owner of property opposite the
proposed site, spoke in opposition to the height limit and
density; that, in his opinion, the project is not in keeping
with projects traditionally desired in Palm Springs ; and that
he circulated a petition in the neighborhood, signed by 43
residents, expressing concerns related to floss of view, high
density, traffic problems, pollution and depreciation of values.
O), 13
Council Minutes
1-4-84 Page 3
2. P.D. 150 (Continued)
He noted comments in letter from Mrs. Molly Winston, copies
of which were made available to the Council and are on file
in the Office of the City Clerk, expressing concerns regarding
traffic. He stated that residents also wish to point out
the impact additional traffic will have on the elementary
school on Mesquite Avenue. He requested a continuance, in
order to permit the residents to consolidate their concerns
and objections and to meet with the developer, who previously
indicated to him that he would be willing to do so.
CONT'D
There being no further appearances, Mayor declared the hearing (116)
closed.
In answer to question by Council , Director of Community Develop-
ment stated that a church tower on Sunrise Way was allowed
to exceed the height limit of the underlying zone (45 ft.
vs. 15 ft. allowed) under a POD process, and that he was not
aware of other such cases where occupied living space was
involved.
Councilman Smith stated that the highrise provision was removed
from other zones sometime ago, and he was concerned that a
precedent might be established, and before doing so, the Council
should discuss the highrise policy.
Councilman Doyle stated he thought it would be beneficial
for both the developer and residents to discuss the project,
and that the Council should explore the current highrise policy
to see if the project will be a significant departure. He
stated there are other areas where major hotels have been
built and good projects are built around them and property
values increase; and that the project could only add to the
value of the surrounding properties.
Councilman Maryanov stated that it does not do the entire
neighborhood any good to leave the property in the condition
in which it has been for the past years; and that he has
concerns about the parking issue, noting that non-hotel guests
will be attracted to the facility; and he agreed that the
highrise policy and implication of the proposed project should
be discussed.
Councilman Foster suggested that the Council meet in joint
study session with the Planning Commission to review the high-
rise issue; and he also would like the issue of widening of
Mesquite Avenue addressed.
Councilman Smith stated that he was not opposed to the project,
per se, but wanted a full discussion as to the precedent and
implementation of current policy; noting that the Council
is considering a site in the vicinity for a convention center,
and the possible impact of highrise in that regard should
be discussed.
Mr. Crow stated that he offered to meet with the residents
after the Planning Commission meeting, but was not contacted;
that he will be available during the following week; and that
it is paramount to avoid jeopardizing his financing, that
the project not be delayed more than a few weeks. He stated
that he is prepared to submit proposals in the next week to
address the the parking issues.
Council Minutes
1-4-84 Page 4
2. P.D. 150 (Continued)
It was moved by Doyle, seconded by Smith, and unanimously CONT'D
carried, that this matter be continued for 30 days, during 1:116)
which the City Council and Planning Commission meet at the
next non-agenda study session for review and discussion as
noted; and that the developer meet with the residents.
3. PUBLIC NUISANCE ABATEMENTS - ACCOUNTING REPORTS
On December 21 , 1983, Council received the Proceedings &
Accounting Reports for various abatements throughout the City,
primarily for weed removal , and the City Clerk set this as
time for public hearings thereon. 1:57)
Building & Safety Director reported that there were over 400
properties cleaned, of which 41 have not paid the costs related
thereto. He stated that of the proposed Resolutions, confirming
the reports, No. 3-C-28 paid this date; and there was an error
on 3-C-21 , which he described, noting that the total cost
was $530.02, rather than $580.02 as shown on the report, and
the difference has been disclosed to the property owner. He
described the procedures, outlined the (Municipal Code, and
stated that those were followed to the letter.
Mayor declared the hearing open.
Bill Howlett, Box 31 , Palm Springs, presented photographs
of his lot, stating that the property was posted in 1978,
after which, he removed dead brush and left only living plants ;
that the property was again posted in December, 1982, and
a substantial cleaning was accomplished thereafter; that he
lives a block away from the lot and, perhaps under poor advice,
he ignored the first posting notice early last summer, believing
it to be an error, since he had done a lot of work since
December, 1982, and knew there was nothing on the lot.
It was the consensus of the Council that this abatement be
returned to staff for review.
Lee Halison, 5101 Showboat Lane, Cathedral City, stated that
he repossessed the lot in December; thatt when he owned it
before, he had the lot cleaned for considerably less ; that
he spoke with Accurate Maintenance, who did not have records
as to how long it took to clean the lot; that he is willing
to pay for the cleaning, but felt $500 for a few hours work
was not a fair price; that the dates in the report are
erroneous; and that the two bids which the City received were
from the same bidder.
Building & Safety Director stated that the completion date
and billing date are July 25, 1983, which was an error shown
on the report; that two bids were obtained, and the lowest
was accepted ; that code procedures were (allowed; and recited
the names of the two companies which bid on the lot, i .e. ,
Underground Unlimited and Accurate Maintenance.
City Manager stated that substantial rainfall resulted in
more growth, which when dried caused a dangerous fire hazard
recognized by the Fire Department as well as concerned citizens
in the community and complaints were received ; and that the
Code Enforcement section did a great deal of work in a short
period of time.
00')
Council Minutes
1-4-84 Page 5
3. PUBLIC NUISANCES (Continued)
Councilman Maryanov stated that the City tries to get the
lowest bid; that, unfortunately, bids are often higher for
the City than in the private sector; that he was sympathetic
to Mr. Halison' s position of being caught in the middle of
the abatement process, but he felt this was a very necessary
program, and there was an acute fire hazard.
CONT'D
It was moved by Doyle, seconded by Maryanov, and unanimously (57)
carried, that Resolution 14850, confirming the report and
filing the lien with regard to 3-C-28 (Halison) , be adopted.
Heinz Zipperle, 39900 Desert Sun Drive, reviewed his letter
submited, a copy of which is on file in the Office of the
City Clerk, stating that his address was changed with the
taxing and other agencies, but he has not been able to get
the County Recorder to change the address, and he did not
receive notices; that he has kept the lot cleaned, including
hauling debris from the lot to the trash container on his
property nearby; that he has cleaned the lot a depth of 110
ft, although his property is less than 100 ft. deep; that
there is an easement at the rear of the property which has
overgrowth on it and it should be ordered to be cleaned.
Building & Safety Director stated that he spoke with Mr.
Zipperle several months ago after the bill was sent; that
he reviewed the work accomplished with the contractor to whom
the bid was awarded, and was advised that the lot was cleaned
from the pole to the street side of Mr. Zipperle's lot; that
the property line is 7-ft behind the curb, and Mr. Zipperle
in previous discussion indicated that he cleaned 99-ft from
the curb.
It was the consensus of the Council that this abatement be
referred to staff to work with the property owner in determining
the property line, and in view of such, ascertain whether
the correct property was charged for the abatement.
There being no further appearances, the hearing was closed.
City Manager stated that following review of the two items
returned to staff, those may be brought back to the Council
for action.
Resolutions 14851 through 14890, confirming reports and filing
liens, were presented; after which, it was moved by Doyle,
seconded by Doyle, seconded by Foster, and unanimously carried,
that Resolutions 14851 through 14890 be adopted, and recorded
with the Tax Assessor and County Recorder.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
a) Jeremy Crocker, 330 W. Arenas Road, read a prepared state-
ment, a copy of which is on file in the Office of the
City Clerk, relative to the Desert Fashion Plaza project,
stating that the City Manager has a conflict of interest,
based on statements which he overheard, and questioned
whether the Council members individually associate them-
selves with the actions proposed by the City Manager and
staff which have brought the project to the point at which
it is at present.
006
Council Minutes
1-4-84 Page 6
Councilman Foster stated that the City Manager and staff
work has been done at the direct request of the City
Council , in consultation with it; that: the work was not
done by the City Manager acting on his own, nor does he
speak for himself, but on behalf of the City Council ;
and that he has followed the explicit. orders and wishes
of the Council .
City Attorney stated that it should tie noted that prior
to any actions concerning the Desert Fashion Plaza
expansion, and on at least two subsequent occasions, the,
City Manager consulted with him whether there was any
conflict, and he advised him that he had none; and that
on the occasion when questioned in a recent Council meeting,
the City Manager stated that he had no conflict, as had
been advised by the City Attorney, and which he still
held as his legal opinion.
Councilman Maryanov commended the City Manager for superb
action, and responsiveness to the needs and wants of the
City Council , and for the time and wort: that he has spent
on this project.
b) Barbara Whitney presented a petition, purportedly signed
by 100 people, favoring a salary range of $15-25,000 per
year for the Mayor.
LEGISLATIVE ACTION:
4. MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENT - ROOM TAX INCREASE
Mayor stated that the Council would receive public testimony
on recommendation to increase the room tax from 7% to 9%,
at this time, and then schedule the matter for a second oppor-
tunity for public testimony, prior to consideration by the
Council .
(1410)
City Manager stated that the history of a possible increase
dates back 2-3 years, and was undefinable until about one
year ago, as to when and if that would happen ; that the Council
concluded that to proceed without any further staff time or
possible City dollars to achieve a convention center, would
not make sense, if at the end it would not be able to raise
the tax to help pay for the facility; thiat the Touche-Ross
study showed the only success would be for the City to have
some of the tax go in that direction; that in January, 1983,
separate meetings were held with major and small hotel owners,
at which critical conditions which had to take place, each
contingent on the other, if a convention center were to proceed,
were reviewed - the first of which was that the room tax
be increased to 9%; that he believed it was the feeling of
the Council that the majority of those who were heard from
were in favor, but there were those who were not in favor;
that at the January 19, 1983 regular Council meeting, the
critical conditions were again referred to, and it was restated
that if the there is a commitment to a convention center and
spending more money, it would be very likely in the future
that the room tax would have to be increased; and that he
believed it appropriate to continue the decision and deal
with it at such point in time when it is appropriate to increase
the tax. He stated there has been a lot of history on this
subject, and it is not an "all of a sudden" issue before the
Council .
Council Minutes
1-4-84 Page 7
4. ROOM TAX AMENDMENT (Continued)
Economic Development & Housing Director reviewed his staff
report, dated January 4, 1983, noting that financing a conven-
tion center consists of three major components, i .e. , a
redevelopment area, an increase in the room tax to 9%, and
additional hotel and retail development adjacent to the
facility; that a redevelopment area has been adopted; that
agreement has been entered into with SENCA as master developer;
and the remaining issue of the tax has not been dealt with;
that a 2% increase would produce $1 ,435,000, which includes
existing and new hotels; that the convention center is projected (140)
to add 107,000 convention delegates; and that the increased
tax is recommended for the overall financial package of the
City.
City Attorney stated that the existing tax contains a provision,
making it a special tax under Prop 13 and the Farrell case;
that he has prepared a revised ordinance, rather than making
it a special tax, it would be an added 2% tax to be put in
the general fund; that he has selected an arbitrary imposition
date of the ordinance of July 1 , 1984, but would be effective
immediately upon passage, as is true with any tax ordinance.
In answer to question by Council , City Attorney stated that
the tax can be limited to a one year period, or other time
frame., however, before making such a decision, he would prefer
researching other possibilities, because of changes occurring
in regulations related to the Council ' s ability to adopt,
or not adopt, a tax, and he would not want to limit that ability
if it meant that after a year, the tax could not be re-adopted;
and perhaps there is some way of tying to a sunset clause,
and he would like bond counsel opinions, as well .
Public comments were made, as follows:
Jim Stewart, 900 El Mirador, suggested that if the tax is
implemented, it be at the "new" season (November, December,
January) to consider brochures which have already been printed,
and business solicited and obtained in connection with the
Olympics; that he favors the convention center; and suggested
a task force approach be taken to look at the issues, consisting
of City Council , staff and hotels representatives.
Marilyn Baker, on behalf of Mel Haber, spoke in support of
a convention center, urging any increased tax be earmarked
for that purpose, and that it not be imposed until after summer.
Bob Riddle, 601 Grenfall , spoke concerning the impact of a
2% increase on small hotels, and that a convention center
will not bring people to the smaller hotels; that a census
of small hotels should taken; and that the tax will be put
the price of rooms out of reach, leading to a chain of actions
to drive small hotels out of business.
Alfred Affinitta, 2000 Golf Club Drive, stated that as a real
estate broker, the tax increase will result in loss of business
for persons dealing in rentals.
Art Nigro, Sheraton Plaza, spoke in favor of a convention
center, and that he favors the increased tax, but not as pre-
sented or before the convention center is definite; that a
convention center will bring in more people than will be lost
because the tax is increased; that the law should not be circum-
vented by providing a slush fund, rather the issue should
be put to an election; that he questions if a 2% increase
would find its way to a convention center if it goes into
the General Fund; and that any tax increase should not be
imposed until the summer after a convention center is in place.
�lJ
Council Minutes
1-4-84 Page 8
4. ROOM TAX AMENDMENT (Continued)
City Manager stated that there has been no attempt to circumvent
the . law; that the fact remains that if 't.he Council raises
the tax, it must go into the General Fund, and that is not
a circumvention ; that it might be appropriate to raise the
question on an election ballot, if a majority would prevail ,
but it would require a 2/3 vote, which he did not see as likely.
Ted Hamscliff, Pepper Tree Inn, spoke in favor of a convention CONT"D
center, and the tax increased, but requested its imposition (140)
be deferred until January, 1985.
Donald McDonald, Monkey Tree Hotel , commented on the asset
of small hotels to the community, the need to protect that
"entity" , and other comments relative to the number of rooms
in the community which he made at the January, 1983 meetings.
Jerry London, on behalf of Hilton-Riviera Hotel owners of
this date, stated that many of the large hotels do not see
a need for a convention center; that he favors an election ;
that the community lacks population to support large shows
needed to help convention centers succeed, e.g. , car shows,
and that the proposed convention center is not large enough
to handle such shows.
Jackie Autry, 4200 E. Palm Canyon, stated that a 2% increase
will discourage business, and she was more concerned about
large convention business going to other cities, e.g. , San
Diego, and Anaheim, which have more amenities than Palm Springs;
that restrictive planning, Council , and administraive practices
in the past have discouraged those amenities from happening;
that the traffic problems must be addresssed; and that more
attractions are needed, if the Council wants to address a
convention center and more hotels.
Council recognized the Temple golf course and Desert Fashion
Plaza expansion projects as steps in that direction.
Arthur Ackerman, Blue Palms Hotel , commented on his observation
of the decline of Atlantic City, when it, increased taxes,
and was only salvaged by instituting gambling.
There were no further appearances.
City Manager stated that a two week continuance would be too
soon, and a 60-day continuance too long, and that the Council
will be reviewing issues concerning the convention center
in the next few weeks, and some certainty as to the increased
funding may be needed.
It was moved by Doyle, seconded by Maryanov, and unanimously
carried, that this matter be continued to February 1 , 1984.
5. EMERGENCY ROOF REPAIRS
Recommendation: That the Council award contract for roof
repairs and reroofing various city facilities to E.R. Brown
Roofing Company, in amount of $282,598; waive formal bid
requirement; and amend the budget to appropriate additional
$18,757, therefore. Report reviewed by General Operations (1117)
Director.
Minute Order 3329, awarding contract as recommended, and Resolu-
tion 14891 , amending the budget, as recommended, were presented;
after which, it was moved by Foster, seconded by Doyle, and
unanimously carried, that Minute Order 3329 and Resolution
14891 be adopted.
009
Council Minutes
1-4-84 Page 9
6. MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENT - PERSONNEL ORDINANCE
Recommendation: That the Council amend the Personnel Ordinance.
(Note: Hearing on new Personnel Rules, and second reading
of Ordinance is scheduled or January 18, 1984) . Personnel
Manager reviewed this item in detail at the last study session.
City Clerk read title of the Ordinance, as follows: (110)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA,
REPEALING CHAPTER 2.40 AND ADDING A NEW CHAPTER 2.40 TO
THE PALM SPRINGS MUNICIPAL CODE, REGULATING IHE PERSONNEL
SYSTEM WITHIN THE CITY.
It was moved by Doyle, seconded by Foster, and unanimously
carried, that further reading be waived, and the Ordinance
be introduced for first reading.
7. NOT USED
8. RENT CONTROL ORDINANCE
On December 21 , 1983, Council continued consideration of the
Rent Control Ordinance amendments and codification, pending
further review regarding prospective tenants.
Councilman Smith stated that the definition in the Initiative
Ordinance failed to include prospective tenant, and he felt (85)
adding it would change the intent of the ordinance, which
per se, he did not have a problem with, rather changing intent
of an ordinance approved by the voters.
Councilman Doyle stated that he supports the ordinance clarific-
ations, as proposed, without reference to prospective tenants.
Councilman Maryanov stated that the definition section of
the Initiative preceeds other sections which the City Attorney
had construed as possibly including prospective tenants ; and
that he did think the Initiative should be expanded.
City Clerk read title of the Ordinance, without reference
to prospective tenants, as follows:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA,
AMENDING AND CODIFYING AS TITLE FOUR OF THE MUNICIPAL
CODE THE "ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS LIMITING
RENTS ON RESIDENTIAL UNITS" HERETOFORE ADOPTED AT THE
GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION HELD APRIL 8, 1980
It was moved by Doyle, seconded by Smith, and unanimously
carried, that further reading be waived, and that the Ordinance
(excludes prospective tenants) be introduced for first reading
9. MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENT - BUILDING SECURITY
City Clerk read title of Ordinance 1210, relative to address
signing, as follows:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA,
AMENDING THE APPLICATION AND SCOPE SECTION OF THE BUILDING (103)
SECURITY ORDINANCE.
It was moved by Doyle, seconded by Foster, and unanimously
carried, that further reading be waived, and that Ordinance
1210 be adopted.
Council Minutes
1-4-84 Page 10
CONSENT AGENDA:
10. Resolution 14892 approving application for Off-Highway Vehicle
(OHV) grant funds, in amount of $20,000 to conduct a feasibility (109)
study of an OHV Park in the Windy Point area.
11 . Resolution 14893 granting underground easement to SCE for service (147)
to proposed new police station.
12. Resolution 14894 granting underground easement to SCE for service (147)
to AFCOM/Fredricks projects in Section 35.
13. Resolution 14895 granting underground easement to SCE for service (147)
to JimsAir Aviation.
14. Minute Order 3330 awarding contract to Sterndahl Enterprises,
Inc. , for installation of raised pavement marker striping patterns (136)
on Ramon Road, from Belardo to Bogie, in amount of $15,100.
15. Minute Order 3331 awarding contract to Architectural Area Lighting
Co. , in amount of $71 ,762 for Civic Center light: fixures. (72)
16. Resolutions 14896, 14897, 14898 and 14899 relative to General
Municipal Election, 1984. (83)
17. Minute Order 3332 awarding purchase of 13 UHF portable radios
and a 13-position, wall mount, rapid charger to Riverside Communi- (117)
cations, in amount of $10,012.76.
18. Resolution 14900 approving Airport Use Agreement with Air
California, for period January 15, 1984 to August 14, 1984. (51 )
19. Resolutions 14901 , 14902 and 14903 approving Payroll Warrants (86)
& Claims & Demands.
20. Minute Order 3333 awarding contract to Munoz & Sons Construction
for storm water catch basin construction at Alejo Road and Avenida (129)
Caballeros, in amount of $15,619.80.
21 . Resolution 14904 approving TTM 19544 to divide property on the
SW corner of Ramon Road and Crossley Road - Sanborn/Stone Pine. (137)
22. Resolution 14905 approving final 12-month time extension for
TTM 16747 for property on the NE corner of N. Indian Avenue and (137)
Racquet Club Road - L. Phillips/New World Dev.
23. Resolution 14906 approving 12-month time extension for TTM 17470 (137)
and P.D. 79, for property on the east side of Bogert Trail , north
of Andreas Hills Drive - Sanborn/J.B. Epstein.
24. Resolution 14907 approving 12-month time extension for TTM 18302
and companion C.U.P. for property on the SW corner of Morongo (137)
Trail and Araby Drive - Snedaker.
25. Resolution --------approving lease agreement with TCCRTE, Inc. ,
dba Brandy' s, for use of 36 parking spaces in Muni Pkg Lot #2,
from 6 p.m. to 2 a.m. , for valet parking.
26. Resolution 14908 concurring in CRA action this date. (124)
It was moved by Doyle, seconded by Foster, and unanimously
carried, that Resolutions 14892 through 14908 and Minute Orders
3330 through 3333 be adopted; Smith abstaining on Resolution
14907.
Council Minutes
1-4-84 Page 11
27. FTM 18370-1
Resolution 14909 approving FTM 18370-1 (Temple) ' was presented;
after which, it was moved by Foster, seconded by Maryanov,
and unanimously carried, Bo ert abstaining, that Resolution
14909 be adopted. Item 25 withdrawn.
REPORTS & REQUESTS:
27. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY REPORT
a) Annual Audit, 1982-83 (Companion to report filed in
November, 1983)
28. CITY COUNCIL reports or requests
Commission Appointments: Mayor announced the appointment
of Janice Lyle to the Historic Site Preservation Board to
fill unexpired term of Juliann Hector, ending 6-30-86; and
the reappointment of John Turlo to the Coachella Valley Mosquito
Abatement District, for a term ending 12-31-85; after which,
motion by Bogert, seconded by Doyle, and unanimously carried,
that said appointments be approved.
29. PUBLIC reports or requests - None
30. STAFF reports or requests - None
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business at 10:30 p.m. , Mayor declared
the meeting adjourned to Tuesday, January 10, 1984, at 2:15
p.m. , in the Large Conference Room, City Hall .
C DITH SUMICH
City Clerk