HomeMy WebLinkAbout7/28/1982 - MINUTES CITY OF PALM ,SPRINGS
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
JULY 28, 1982
An Adjourned Regular Meeting of the City Council was called to
order by Mayor Bogert in the Council Chamber, 3200 Tahquitz-McCallum ,
Way, on Wednesday, July 28, 1982, at 7:30 p.m.
ROLL CALL: Present: Councilmembers Foster, Ortner,i4aryanov
and Mayor Bogert
Absent: Councilman Doyle
The meeting was opened with the salute to the Flag and a moment
of silence.
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY: Mayor declared the meeting adjourned
for the purpose of convening as the Community Redevelopment Agency;
after which, members reconvened as the City Council .
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
It was moved by Ortner, seconded by Foster, and unanimously
carried, that the minutes of July 7 and 14, 1982 be approved;
Doyle absent.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1 . ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 1-39
Recommendation: That the Council approve resolutions ,
relating to improvements in Assessment District 139, i .e. , '
referring to boundary map, protests, assessment confirmation,
contract award and sale of bonds.
Director of Community Development reviewed his report,
dated July 28, 1982, noting the improvements consist of
sewers and asphalt capping in three areas, referred to
as 139-A, 139-B and 139-C; that protests representing (56)
75% of the area for 139-B have been received, and that
the boundary map for the district should be amended to
delete 139-B; that the construction contract be awarded
to Massey Sand & Rock in amount of $268,731 .55, less the
total sum bid for 139-B; and that the sale of bonds be
awarded to California Municipal Investors, Inc.
Mayor declared the hearing open.
Don Conway, 1758 Mesa Drive, questioned how much he would
have to pay if he were to pay the assessment in full before
going to bond ; to which, Mr. Brown, bonding counsel explained
the discount.
There being no further appearances, the hearing was closed.
Resolutions 14322, 14323, 14324, 14325 and 14326, as required,
relating to protests, deleting 139-B from the boundary
map, confirming assessments, and awarding construction
contract and sale of bonds, as recommended, were presented; -
after which, it was moved by Foster, seconded by Maryanov,
and unanimously carried, that said Resolutions be adopted.
Doyle absent.
1
�81
Council Minutes
7-28-82 Page 2
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
a) Dallas Holms, attorney representing PSUSD, spoke in
support of adopting the School Impact Mitigation
measure, and noted that the Board of Education adopted
' a resolution attempting to resolve the disposition
and accounting question relating to the fee.
b) Harold Heers, 69278 Tamala, Palm Springs, stated that
he is developing housing project which meets affordable
housing criteria, known as Sunrise Palms, and that
at the time of approval , condition was placed that
the project was subject to possible future school
fee; that during the interim many matters were
discussed, including various amounts for the fee;
that he obtained his building permits, which did not
include the fee since no decision had been reached
at that time; that the burden would be placed on those
for whom the housing is targeted, i .e. , for this project
the buyer profile indicates an elderly population;
that he is opposed to making the fee retroactive;
and that he has no objection to applying the fee to
those units of the project for which a building permit
' has not been taken.
c) Harold Williamson, 9690 Sierra Way, commented on
drainage fees, noting that defects were identified
with regard to the fee, i .e. , cost benefit analysis
not done, weak environmental assessment report, and
shortfall of funds even with imposition of the fee;
' that comments have been made that only Indian Lands
will be developed because it is thought that the Tribal
Council will sustain an appeal and the fee will not
be required ; that the drainage fee matter should be
reopened and restudied and that a moratorium should
be imposed on excess drainage charges ; that developers
in the community are taking an economic beating; and
that he favors a program that takes care of public
safety, but excesses should be examined, in particular,
nuisance water - both of which he believed could be
dealt with separately.
.- d) Allen Perrier, 225 S. Civic, representing JiinsAir,
stated that appeal was filed from Planning Commission
action in April , to impose drainage fees as a
requirement of conditional use permit approval , which
was rejected by the City Clerk as not being a timely
filing; that subsequent appeal from the Clerk's action
was submitted, which was also not accepted because
there are no Code provisions for such appeal ; that
there are significant legal and practical reasons
why the Council should hear the appeal . He reiterated
comments which he has previously made regarding drainage
fees and the General Plan requirements and stated
-' that fees were adopted as part of the Subdivision
Ordinance which does not apply to the JimsAir project.
e) Bob Mainiero, 596 N. Farrell , local engineer, stated
that he supported the JimsAir position, in particular
the need for cost benefit analysis; that there are
► many situations which relate to nuisance water and
each element should be reviewed to make that
distinction; and that the fees should be revised based
on conclusions reached in the restudy of the master
plan.
Council Minutes
7-28-82 Page 3
f) Allen Perrier, 225 S. Civic, representing owners of
property north of Ramon near the former dump site,
questioned if the property would be able to come into
the redevelopment; project if needed, and stated that
he did not find any reasonable distinction between
that which is proposed to be included and that of
his client.
LEGISLATIVE ACTION:
2. DUAL SEWER SYSTEM POLICY - ABANDONMENT
Recommendation: That the Council eliminate requirement
for installation of a dual sewer system on an interim
basis for all new residential units not otherwise exempted,
provided such units are not occupied prior to June 1 ,
1983.
Director of Community Development stated that the dual
system was approved several years ago as an alternative (128)
to stopping development because of lack of capacity at
the sewer plant; that the current expansion is anticipated
to be completed by November, 1983; that there is a certain
amount of time between construction and time project -is
ready for occupancy, and it is expected that sewage flows
will be reduced in June, which has historically been the
case; and that of the units approved to date, but for j
which permits have not been taken., but which could be
taken and the units completed and ready for occupancy '
prior to June 1 , 1983, the dual system requirement will
be waived on the first 500 units on a first-come,
first-served basis.
In answer to question by Council , Director of Community
Development stated that single-family construction on
lots of record for which sewer lines are in the street,
the ability to connect to the sewer has always existed
and dual systems were not required in those instances.
Resolution 14327 eliminating requirement, as recommended,
was presented; after which, it was moved by Maryanov,
seconded by Foster, and unanimously carried, that Resolution
14327 be adopted; Doyle absent.
3. SCHOOL IMPACT MITIGATION
Background: On June 16, 1982, the Council gave tentative
approval of school impact mitigation measure, ordered
a negative declaration of environmental asessment and
continued final action to this date.
Director of Community Development recommended that the
Council order the negative declaration filed, approve (114)
the resolution for mitigation, and grant exemption to
PD 110 and 116.
In answer to question by Council , , City Attorney stated
that he has not had further discussion with the District's
attorney regarding use of funds, however, the District's
resolution provides that funds are to be used for capital
improvements, including buildings and furniture, that
the resolution proposed before the Council includes
provision that the measure may be suspended by the Council
during time when District did not have a separate fund
for the fees and that funds could only be spent on capital
facilities, the intent of which was to mean real property
Councill Minutes
7-28-82 Page 4
3. SCHOOL IMPACT MITIGATION (Continued)
type improvements; that the Council could also limit that
4 to capital items having a usable life of at least 10 years
or some other period of time that might be desired, which
` would be clear that funds could not be spent on supply
items, but could include necessary furnishings for the
school building.
In answer to questions by Council , Director or Community
Development stated that condition was imposed on projects
after February, 1981 , that the City was studying the measure
and the project might be subject to that fee; that the
Heers project is the same type of housing as the Lapham
and AFCOM projects, however, it came in after the February,
1981 date; and that any affordable housing projects after
establishment of the fee would be subject to the fee unless
the Council were to waive that category.
City Attorney stated that effective date of the proposed
resolution is August 1 , 1982; that interpretation could
be made, with good assurance of making it stick, that (Cont'd)
the fee could be retroactive 60 days. (114)
In answer to question by Council , Building & Safety Director
stated that permits for 16 units have been issued since
June 1 , 1982.
Councilman Foster stated that he was concerned for the
developer in making the fee retroactive, but also concerned
' about the revenue problems for the School District,
Councilman Maryanov stated that he shared the concern
about the effective date, however, the fee is to mitigate
impact of new growth on the schools and to provide funds
to construct new schools ; that the project noted this
r. date would not add to the school population and would
provide affordable housing; that he favors the August
1 date and the expenditure of funds only for new school
construction, which will be required if the population
increases; that the population increases as new housing
is provided, and that the Heers project mentioned will
r not create additional impact on the schools.
Mayor stated that he felt it would behoove the District
if it met with the Tribal Council to explain why it is
not using SB 201 instead of the mitigation measure proposed.
Motion by Maryanov, seconded by Ortner, to adopt the pro-
posed resolution with an effective date of August 1 , 1982,
failed to carry by the following vote:
AYES: Maryanov and Bogert
' NOES: Foster and Ortner
ABSENT: Doyle
r
084
Council Minutes 1
7-28-82 Page 5
3. SCHOOL IMPACT MITIGATION (Continued)
City Attorney stated that in the event of a tie-vote,
the motion is lost, however, if the tie-vote is as a result
of lack of a full membership of the Councill , then the
matter automatically carries over to the next meeting
unless action is otherwise taken. He stated that it was ,
his understanding that Mr. Heers had applied for existing
building permit substantially prior to June 1 , and permits
would have been issued except for the convenience of the
department in plan checking and one-half of the project
was continued to after the June 1 date; that the most
legally sound position would be to have a set date, e.g. ,
August 1 ; and that attorney for the District has indicated
to him that although the District would not want to reject (114)
any fees that may have accrued, it would prefer to have
the fee in-place and adopted with August 1 as the date,
rather than to have the matter continued. He also noted
that the potential problem on retroactivity would exist ;-
regardless of the date back from which the retroactive
portion would begin, e.g. , August 1 or September 1 .
Mayor stated that he was not sure why the vote resulted
in a tie, and would recommend continuing until the next
meeting.
Councilman Foster stated that he supported the June 1
date, because he believed the School District should receive
as much revenue as it can, and that the developer would
be in a position of passing on the amount to the buyer;
and that since continuance would create the same problem '
on retroactivity, he would favor reconsideration of the
action taken.
It was moved by Foster, seconded by Maryanov, and carried
by the following vote, that Resolutions 14328 and 14329,
establishing August 1 , 1982, as the effective date, and
granting exemptions to P.D. 110 and P.D. 116, be adopted:
AYES: Foster, Maryanov and Bogert
NOES: Ortner
ABSENT: Doyle
4. PALM HILLS ESTATES NO. 1 - ASSESSMENT DISTRICT ti
Background: On July 14, 1982, the Council continued consid-
eration of declaring initial policy regarding formation
of a special assessment district for Palm Hills Estates
No. 1 .
Director of Community Development noted that this matter (56)
has been reviewed in detail at prior study sessions, and
that pros and cons are outlined in his report of July
14, 1982.
Resolution 14330, declaring policy, was presented; after
which, it was moved by Foster, seconded by Ortner, and
unanimously carried, Doyle absent, that Resolution 14330
be adopted.
081
Council Minutes
7-28-82 Page 6
5. TRAFFIC SIGNALS - 5 INTERSECTIONS
Background: On July 14, 1982, Council continued recommenda-
tion to award contract for installing and modifying traffic
signals at five intersections to Paul Gardner Corp. , in
amount of $207,646.
Director of Community Development reviewed details of
background information memorandum from Traffic Engineerinng
Assistant relative to basis for recommending signal at
Calle Encilia and Ramon Road, a copy of which is on file
in the Office of the City Clerk.
Councilwoman Ortner stated that she favored the signal
and did not believe that striping would significantly (130)
improve ability to make left-turn movement for Ca11e Encilia
southbound traffic.
Councilman Foster stated that off-set of Calle Encilia
creates problem; that it does not meet warravits based
on accidents, and barely meets traffic volume, that he
believed the striping would solve the problem; that
installing a signal would only cause traffic to move over
one block to Calle El Segundo, because people will not
be willing to wait for the signal to change; that
expenditure for 'the signal is a waste of money, and that
its, location is too close to Indian Avenue, with another
signal being located only one-half block away on Palm
Canyon. His motion to award the contract, deleting ,Calle
Encilia failed to carry by the following vote:
' AYES: Foster and Maryanov
NOES: Ortner and Bogert
ABSENT: Doyle
Following discussion regarding impact of tie-vote, it
was moved, by Foster, seconded by Maryanov, and unanimously
carried, Doyle absent, that Minute Order 3108, awarding
the contract for all but the Calle Encilia location be
adopted. Action regarding the fifth location will automati-
cally_ carry over to the next meeting of the full membership
of the Council .
x 6. AIRPORT RULES & REGS AMENDMENT & COUNTRY CLUB
LIMOUSINES LICENSE AGREEMENT
Recommendation: That the Council amend the Airport Rules
and Regs. regarding fees for charter party carriers ; and
�. approve license agreement with Ronald L. Miller, dba Country
Club Limousines, effective August 1 , 1982 and ending June
30, 1984. (51)
Airport Supervisor reviewed report of Transportation
Director, dated July 28, 1982, detailing specifics of
the amendment and terms of the license agreement.
Resolutions 14331 and 14332, amending the Rules and approv-
ing the license agreement, as recommended, were presented;
after, which, it was moved by Ortner, seconded by Foster,
and unanimously carried, Doyle absent, that Resolutions
14331 and 14332 be adopted.
(�8G
Council Minutes
7-28-82 Page 7 f
7. ORGANIZATION DEVELOPMENT TRAINING PROGRAM
Recommendation: That the Council approve 1982-83 contract
with Sentient Systems, Inc. to provide new trainers (TOTS)
within the organization and to give these new trainers
and the existing ones capabilities to encourage organiza-
tional change through the use of techniques such as quality '
circles.
City Manager reviewed his report, dated July 28, 1982,
noting that this matter was reviewed in detail at the
last study session, and that the training program is riot
intended as a total replacement for employee training. (110)
In answer to question by Council , he stated that emphasis
on organization development and training needs to be
on-going; and that the mix of consultant and staff is
subject to periodic evaluation.
Minute Order 3109, approving letter proposal , as
recommended, was presented ; after• which, it was moved
by Maryanov, seconded by Ortner, and unanimously carried,
Doyle absent, that Minute Order 3109 be adopted.
8. COGENERATION FEASIBILITY STUDY ,
Recommendation: That the Council approve letter proposal
of Pacifica Energy Corp. to conduct a cogeneration
feasibility study; appropriate funds in the amount of
$69,325; and authorize participation in So. Calif. Gas 1
Co. grant program to recover a portion of said program (52)
costs.
Building & Safety Director noted that the grant would
result in recovering $10,000 of the cost; that the study
includes City Hall and buildings in that area, Sunrise
Plaza, including the swimming pool , and the Wastewater
Treatment Plant, as well as looking at interactions with
the private sector to promote cogeneration in the community;
and that the consultant will forego its usual profit and
simply breakeven as a result of its interest in this
project.
Discussion ensued as to potential for riot 'including City
Hall and the Police Building since both are to be expanded.
It was reported by both the Building & Safety Director
and the Consultant, that it would be possible to do so,
however, it was not recommended and it appears preliminarily
that the City Hall , including proposed expansion, will
result in the highest payback; and that it is advantageous +
to look at all areas and combine tradeoffs between them.
Councilman Foster stated that perhaps it would be better
to do one project to begin with, e.g. , 'Sunrise Plaza,
to sell the possibility of payback, and not do the City
Hall and Police buildings at this time, particularly,
since the Police building is proposed to be totally redone.
Councilman Maryanov stated that there is every indication
of the potential payback; that there is an obvious energy
crisis situation and that Gas Co. has announced substantial
rate increases; that delaying the study would result in
delaying implementation and that would be a disservice
to the City; that everything known about the project
warrants taking the risk generally associated with
feasibility studies; that the City has an obligation to
provide leadership to its community and the $7,500 of
the total contract can provide information which the total
community can use.
T Council Minutes
7-28-82 Page 8
8. COGENERATION (Continued)
City Manager stated that if it were desired to select
one site before committing to the others, a suggestion
would be to proceed with the study and then determine
which project is the most feasible.
Minute Orders 3110 and 3111 , approving letter proposal (52)
and grant participation, and Resolution 14333 amending
the budget, were presented; after which, it was moved
by Ortner, seconded by Maryanov, and unanimously carried,
Doyle absent, that Minute Orders 3110 and 3111 and Resolu-
tion 14333 be adopted.
9. PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT AREAS
Recommendation: That the Council adopt resolution selecting
preliminary boundaries for 6 proposed redevelopment project
areas and direct Planning Commission to prepare preliminary
plans therefore.
Redevelopment Director stated that his matter was reviewed (133)
in detail at the last study session, and that the Tahquitz-
Andreas and Ramon-Bogie project area descriptions have
been revised to reflect discussion at the study session;
and that once the Planning Commission completes its work,
the matter will go to the Redevelopment Agency for consider-
ation and then to the County and taxing agencies For review
and ultimately for public hearing by the Council .
Resolution 14334, selecting the sites as revised, was
presented; after which, it was moved by Foster, seconded
by Maryanov, and unanimously carried, Doyle absent, that
Resolution 14334 be adopted.
l8g
Council Minutes
7-28-82 Page 9
CONSENT AGENDA:
10. Resolution 14335 urging passage of SB 1422, regarding decla- (98)
rations of State policy with regard to public airports.
11 . Resolution 14336 authorizing City Manager to execute agreements (113)
in 1982-83 for police officers to attend CHP motorcycle
training class.
12. Resolution 14337 fixing amount of money to be raised from (140)
property taxes for 1982-83 debt service requirements and
tax rate therefor.
13. Resolution 14338 increasing sewer facility fee to $1,805 (128 &
for each residential unit, with corresponding percentage 114)
increase for commercial , industrial and hotel units, as of
August 1, 1982.
14. Minute Order 3112 awarding purchase of street crack sealing (136)
material to Sahuaro Petroleum & Asphalt Co. , in amount of
$35,377.50 for 75 tons.
15. Resolution 14339 authorizing purchase of lubricating oils (123) J
and greases through the County contract with Union Oil Co.
16. Minute Order 3113 approving increase in contract with Sperry (117)
Univac to lease additional computer hardware costing $120
per month.
17. Resolution 14340 declaring intent to approve an amendment (110)
to contract with the Public Employees Retirement System,
to establish single highest year' s earnings as criterion
for determining retirement annuity for Fire Safety, employees,
pursuant to 1982 MOU, said amendment to be effective January
1 , 1983.
18. Minute Order 3114 ratifying emergency purchase of replacement (127')
bearing assembly and seals for Trickling Filter No. 2, in
amount of $7,096.70 to Fulco Sales, sole source supplier.
19. Resolution 14341 approving Claims & Demands. (86)
20. Resolution 14342 approving Final Parcel Map 16326 to divide (119)
property on Ramon Road, west of Fern Canyon Drive., Billington/C.
Rose.
21 . Resolution 14343 approving final development plans for Planned (116)
Development District 129, 76-unit condominium project on
the westerly end of Tahquitz-McCallum Way, Cadillac-Fairview
Homes.
22. Resolutions 14344 and 14345 approving annual spread of assessment (56)
for Street Lighting Maintenance Districts 1 and 2„
23. Resolution 14346 approving phasing plan for Tentative Tract (137)
Map 15620 for property on Stevens Road/Vista Chino/Via Monte
Vista, Hallmark/E. Marteka.
24. Resolution 14347 approving Tentative Tract Map 15945 to divide (137)
property on Avenida Caballeros and Vista Chino, , IKWL/J. Cotton.
25. Resolution 14348 approving Tentative Parcel Map 113713 to (119)
divide property on the NE corner of N. Palm Canyon and Racquet
Club, Webb/Racquet Club North, Ltd.
0K
Council Minutes
7-28-82 Page 10
CONSENT (Continued)
26. Resolution 14349 approving 127mo. extension for Tentative (137)
Tract Map 17151 in connection with P.D. 129 (above item 21 ) .
27. Resolution 14350 approving Tentative Tract Map 1-8087 to divide . (137)
property on Bogert Trail , KWL/Andreas Hills, Inc.
28. Resolution 14351 approving Tentative Tract Nap 17943 to divide (137)
property on theNW corner of N. Palm Canyon and Vereda del
Norte, Webb/R. Baddour.
29. Resolution 14352 approving second 12-mo. extension for Tentative (137)
Tract Map, 11559 for property on Mesquite,, between Cerritos
and- S.unr-ise, Ervin/C.G. Dunham.
30. Resolution -1.43'53 concurring in CRA actions of this date. (124)
It was moved by Foster, seconded .by Maryanov, and unani-
mously., carried, ,Doyle absent, that Resolutions 14335 through
14353 and Minute Orders 3112 through 3114 be adopted.
31 , PARKWAYS MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS
City Manager stated that because the hearing date originally
proposed ,is after- the last date which the County Auditor (138)
will accept the charges, he recommended that the Council
schedule the matter for an- adjourned regular meeting to
be held on Thursday, August 12, 1982, at 3 p.m. , in the
Large Conference Room, City Hall ,. and that the Resolution
' approving the Engineer' s Report and setting the hearing
date be, so amended; after which, Resolution 14354, approving
the ' report„ and setting the date as recommended, was
presented, and it was moved by Maryanov, seconded by -Faster
and ' unanimously carri-ed, ' Doyle absent, that Resolution
14354 be adopted.
32. SECTION 35 - AFCOM/FREDRICKS WALL & LANDSCAPING
Recommendation: That the Council award contract 'to Massey (S5)
Sand .& Rock Co. , in .amount. _of $133,085, to construct wall
and landscaping improvements north of San Rafael Drive.
Minute Order 31:15, awarding the contract, was presented;
after which;' it was moved by Ortner, seconded by Maryanov,
and unanimously carried, Doyle absent, that Minute Order
3115 be adopted.
33. DENSITY CONTROLLED RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS
Recommendation: That the Council approve modifications
to conditions effecting density controlled residential ,
projects; and to specifically . modify: conditions effecting (101 &
P.D-. 110, 115 and 116, to allow unit sales prices to 116)
increase in an amount not to exceed- the cost of any .interest
1 rate buy down offered by the developer.
Director of Community Development reviewed specifics of
the modifications.
Resolutions - 14355 and 14356, approving amendments and
specific modifications, were presented; after which, it
was moved by Foster, seconded by Maryanov, and unanimously
carried, Doyle absent, that Resolutions 14355- and 14356
be adopted.
090
Council Minutes
7-28-82 Page 11
34. PALM TREE TRIMMING POLICY
Recommendation: That the Council establish criteria for
palm tree trimming within the City and incorporate same (114)
as a policy in the Administrative Procedures & Policies
Manual ; matter was reviewed at the last study session.
Minute Order 3116, establishing the policy, was presented•,
after which, it was moved_ by Ortner, seconded by Foster.,
and unanimously carried, Doyle absent, that Minute Order
3116 be adopted.
REPORTS & REQUESTS:
35. Departmental Reports - Received & Ordered Filed
a) Treasurer' s Monthly - May, 1982
36. CITY COUNCIL reports or requests - None
37. PUBLIC reports or requests
a) Allen Perrier, 225 S. Civic, stated that there are
some appeals before the Tribal Council which involve
significant fees; that indication is that those will
be successful and the City Council 's decision reversed;
that the drainage fee for JimsAir will be $93,000,
and in view of the circumstances, it is unjustified
for it to have to put up that money in order to move
forward with its project; that request is made for ,
the Council to set the appeal for hearing, if for
no other reason than to table it and place it in the
same status as other projects on appeal ; and that
JimsAir is willing to post bond to assure payment
of the fee.
City Manager stated that one -issue relates to whether
drainage fee is appropriate; and the second relates
to the status of the appeal ; that he has questions
regarding validity of the appeal ; that the authority
to attach the fee is ordinance of the Council and
is not a discretionary matter; that the ordinance
itself should be dealt with in that regard; that both
the Tribal Council and the City have received the
revised master plan ; that there has been some difficulty
in arranging meeting with the local engineers to see
if, in their judgement, there are any technical problems
and, if so, it will be necessary to go back to the
flood control district and resolve those - if not,
then the next step would be isolating problem areas
in order to know where funds should go to achieve
the greatest benefit; that the Tribal Council understood
that the revised plan had just been received, and
that commitment has been made to follow through in
a timely manner; and that the Council will be involved
in looking at that and making the ultimate decision
on the drainage plan.
No action taken.
U91
Council Minutes
7-28-82 Page 12
38. STAFF reports or requests - None
i
AWOURNMENT
There being no further business at 9: 30 p.m. , Mayor declared
the meeting adjourned. (Note: Regular Meeting of August
4,. 1982, to be adjourned by City Clerk to August 12, 1982,
a.t 3 p.m. , in the Large Conference Room, City Hall , due
to lack of a quorum; regular meeting of August 18, 1982,
to also be adjourned by the City Clerk due to lack of
a-. quorum, next meeting September 1 , 1982. )
TH SUMICH
City Clerk
,
w