HomeMy WebLinkAbout2/3/1982 - MINUTES 41_
CITY OF PALM SPRINGS
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
FEBRUARY 3, 1982
A Regular Meeting of the City Council was called to order by Mayor
Doyle, in the Council Chamber, 3200 Tahquitz-McCallum Way, on
Wednesday, February 3, 1982, at 7:30 p.m.
ROLL CALL: Present: Councilmembers Field, Ortner, Rose and
Mayor Doyle
Absent: None
The meeting was opened with the salute to the Flag.
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY : Mayor declared the meeting
adjourned for the purpose of convening as the Community Redevelop-
ment Agency; after which, members reconvened as the City Council .
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
It was moved by Rose, seconded by Field, and unanimously
carried, that the minutes of January 11 and 12, 1982 be
approved.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1 . GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT & ZONING CASE 5.0160 - GOLDEN WEST
EQUITY PROPERTIES
City Attorney reported the following relating to items under
consideration:
a) One item relates to a requested General Plan Amendment;
one to a request for a zone change, which the Planning
Commission recommended against; and one to a mitigation (101 )
measure in approving a negative declaration.
b) The General Plan Amendment is not appealable, since it
was merely legislative action, which had been referred
back to the Planning Commission for recommendation;
that it is not being appealed, but interested parties
have the right to input, but not to due process rights
that would attach to an appeal .
c) The zone change is appealable under the City's Zoning
Ordinance, and appeal was filed in July, 1981 , and
it is an appeal under any circumstances and the addi-
tional letter is adequate for that purpose; and that
notice has been given which exceeds the requirements
of the Zoning Ordinance.
d) Under existing policy, the issue relating to the
mitigation measure is appealable, and the recent
appeal letter addresses that issue.
e) The Council may affirm, reverse, or modify the imposition
of the mitigation measure condition; and may adopt any
General Plan Amendment designation and any zone designa-
tion which has been considered by the Planning Commission
in its deliberations, anything to the contrary would
have to be referred back to the Commission; and that
the zoning designation must be consistent with the
General Plan Amendment.
� ZO
Council Minutes
2-3-82 Page 2
1 . GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT & ZONING CASE 5.0160 (Continued)
In answer to questions by Council , City Attorney stated
that discussion at the last study session did riot affect
the Council 's position to hear the appeal and to make a
decision; that if action is taken to approve a zone change,
that action may be appealable and due process requirements
met to give adequate time in which to make such an appeal ,
and an ordinance effectuating the change would have to
be presented for first and second reading and adoption;
and that the proposed resolution may be adopted, if the
Council desired to follow the Commission's recommendation,
and anything different would require a modification thereof,
particularly with respect to the exhibit.
Director of Community Development stated that this matter CONT'r_
was originally before the Council in July, 1981 ; that (101 )
the M-1-P standards are being revised, but not ;yet com-
pleted; that the Commission's action regarding the zone
change was not a denial , but that the applicant apply
under a planned development district (POD) to pursue
implementation of a project on the property, which it
believed would allow the flexibility needed to consider
whateverthe applicant may wish to have considered, e.g. ,
part of the property is appropriate for open space type
uses such as the parking of cars; that the Commission's
recommendation was in the spirit of cooperation and an
effort to establish use that might ultimately be the
easiest way by which the developer could proceed; that
the developer opposed the mitigation measure relating
to assisting in future open space; and that the Commission
recommended approving the General Plan Amendment; and that
the 0 zone not be changed at this time.
In answer to questions by Council , Director of Community
Development stated that it is not uncommon to utilize the
POD to combine multiple zones for achieving a single
project, but the provisions are much broader and give the
ability to consider, without regard to zoning but with
regard to the General Plan, merits relating to a specific
development; that the majority of PDDs approved have been
in-lieu of a requested zone change by a developer, generally
a development plan has been involved; and cited Palm Hills
as example where the land was subdivided, but the parameters
were established by POD as to future procedures -to be
followed in developing a house on a given lot; that, in
this case, the developer is talking about subdividing into
lots, however, access will be a critical issue and it will
be necessary to look at some plan regarding access to the
lots and it would not make sense to think that each could
have access onto Ramon or Bogie Road, but rather to establish
common frontage, landscape, etc. , so it would not appear
that the parcel had been developed in a piecemeal fashion;
that the developer is considering auto uses, which are not
allowed by right-of-zone in the M-1-P, and for which a
separate conditional use permit would have to be obtained
on each lot, however, if a POD were approved for the entire
site, that use could be spelled out as well as substandard
lot sizes, which also not necessitate a variance in lot
sizes in the subdivision map; and that if a POD is approved
on that basis, the subdivision map would follow that approval ,
and the developer would then be able to sell the lots.
Mayor declared the hearing open.
�2
Council Minutes
2-3-82 Page 3
1 . GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT & ZONING CASE 5.0160 (Continued)
Bruce McDonald, 1949 S. State College Blvd. , Anaheim,
applicant, stated that the purpose of the PDD is to
take an existing property with given zoning and to
combine those in order to deviate from zoning guidelines
which have been established; that, in this case, there
is no established zoning on the property, and he did
not believe the PDD to be appropriate; that the area
is surrounded, for the most part, by industrial zoning
and the Council referred this matter back to the
Planning Commission to establish zoning which would
permit similar industrial uses, and he did not agree
with the recommendation of the Commission; that he
felt the issue regarding the open space mitigation
measure had been resolved, and found to be irrelevant
and unfounded; that he did not believe the zone change
request should be denied because a portion of the
property may require soil reconditioning, since
the issue on soils constraints is something handled
at the Building Department level ; that he felt it was
confusing to draw a line through the property, and CONT 'D
if it is appropriate for industrial use, it should be (101 )
changed to such for the entire parcel ; that he did not
want the PDD because it does not establish uses for
marketing and leaves no tool to know what the uses
will be, rather a great potential for a number of uses;
that, in his opinion, the PDD has never been used for
industrial or commercial uses; that the M-1-P has
guidelines spelled out; and that he would like to
be able to establish parcel maps as the project proceeds
at which point, each would be submitted for approval and
recordation.
James Schlecht, 801 E. Tahquitz-McCallum Way, attorney
representing applicant, stated that he did not think
the action recommended was realistic from the perspective
of what the developer is trying to do, nor that which
is in the best interest of the City; that the concern
regarding ammm can be addressed at the tract map stage,
and it was recognized that a series of lots could not
be created that would each have access to Ramon Road
and that some kind of frontage road will have to be
developed; that it is critical to the developer that he
be able to parcel map the site; that the PDD has been
used for industrial and commercial uses, but those
have been with a clear understanding of the ultimate
goal of the project, which is not the case in this
situation; that exploration has been underway with
auto and other potential users, but lot size needs are
unknown; that granting the zoning does not mean that,
if the project came together, that it would not be
advantageous to the developer and City to pursue a
PDD to achieve the desired end result; that in the
example of Palm Hills, everyone knew that single-family
home lots were going to be developed; that he thought
that the issue of open space had been worked out, since
when the City traded the subject parcel , it received
in return 200 acres of open space on the hillside, and
it is not clear as to what the condition means as far
as the applicant is concerned. In answer to question
by Council , he stated that without the zoning, the
developer has no idea as to what to file for under a
PDD.
� zz
Council Minutes
2-3-82 Page 4
1 . GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT & ZONING CASE 5.0160 (Continued)
Lloyd McDonald stated that he believed it was a case of
musical chairs to go from no zoning to a POD, and that
they cannot move forward anymore than with the 0 zone.
In answer to question by Council , Director of Community
Development explained the buffer requirements between
M-1-P and residential .
Councilwoman Ortner stated that she concurred with the
position and letter of Mr. Schlecht; that she felt the
open space issue had been resolved; and that in view of
the surrounding M-1 zoning, she would not feel that
the Council was not upholding its duty in granting the
change of zone to either M-1 or M-1-P.
In answer to question by Council , Director of Community
Development stated that he did not agree with • Mr.
McDonald's comments regarding a marketing tool , and
that perhaps the developer did not understand how to
utilize the PDD; that the POD can establish condition
to allow the M-1-P standards, as well as changes
including auto uses and development plans, and once CONT'_
those are established, only architectural review (101 )
remains to be completed; that he felt it would be more
cumbersome for the developer in the long run to proceed
only under the M-1-P zoning; and that regarding lot
sizes, if that is unknown, then the developer cannot
file a subdivision map.
Mayor declared the hearing closed.
Councilman Field stated that the PDD is a familiar and
customary vehicle for development; that the Planning
Commission has been sensitive to the area proposed to
be developed and the M-1-P, as it recommended, should
be the standard which is followed and the POD should
be employed; and that he would be persuaded to the
applicant's view regarding the open space issue, but
otherwise would support the recommendation of the
Planning Commission.
In answer to question by Council , Mr. McDonald stated
he understood the PDD process, however, the critical
issue is the zoning and, once established, it would
not preclude a laterapplication for a PDD.
In answer to question by Council , Director of Community
Development stated that his comments referred to a PDD
being filed by the developer for the entire site;, and
that under the M-1-P zoning, the owner of each parcel
purchased would have to apply for a conditional use
permit for that parcel .
Councilman Rose stated that this matter had been referred
back to the Planning Commission with the request that the
0 designation be removed, not in part but in total , and
he did not see how the Commission could have sent: back a
recommendation with 0 designation still remaining on part
of the property; that he believes the developer has a right
to zoning being granted by the Council which it dleems appropriate;
that the Tribal Council overruled the Council in granting M-1
zoning across the street; that he would prefer M-1-P on the
site; and that he would support a General Plan Amendment
qz
Council Minutes
2-3-82 Page 5
1 . GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT & ZONING CASE 5.0160 (Continued)
showing industrial designation for the entire parcel ;
the deletion of the mitigation measure from the
environmental assessment regarding open space; and
the instruction to staff for preparation of an
ordinance providing a change of zone to M-1-P for
the entire parcel .
Mayor stated that he concurred with the action
suggested by Councilman�Rose, and felt that if there
had been a covenant running-with-the-land in 1967
to require open space, the mitigation measure would
make sense, however, that was not the case and it CONT'D
should not be imposed at this time. (OOT )
It was moved by Rose, seconded by Ortner, and
carried by the following vote, that Resolution
14133, amending the General Plan Land Use Element
by changing the land use designation for approximate
40 acre parcel on the NE corner of Ramon Road and
Bogie Road to industrial use, be adopted; that
the mitigation measure relating to open space in
the negative declaration be deleted; and that
an ordinance be provided for presentation to the
Council , to provide a change of zone to M-1-P for
the entire subject property:
AYES: Ortner, Rose & Doyle
NO: Field
ABSENT: None
Council Minutes
2-3-82 Page 6
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
a) Phil Short, 149 Twin Palms Drive, questioned the
ability of Waste Disposal Services to impose rates
and require mandatory service, without the user
being able to make any appeal ; and commented on
poor telephone service in contacting the CATV
company and its ability to change rates at: will .
Mayor explained that a response would be provided
to Mr. Short regarding waste disposal pickup, and
stated that by action of the Legislature, CATV is
no longer regulated and the City has no control
over establishment of rates. He stated that staff
efforts have resulted in the company providing
additional telephone service to respond to complaints,
and that concerns regarding CATV have to be addressed
at a higher level of government.
b) Larry Slaten, Vista Canyon Estates, representing
Western Ventures (Tract 16544), stated his availability
to respond to questions and that with the clarifying (137)
language provided by the Director of Community
Development, the developer is agreeable to the
extension with conditions.
LEGISLATIVE ACTION :
2. TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 16544 - TIME EXTENSION
Recommendation: That the Council grant 2-year time extension,
with conditions, for the above map, for property between
Calle Encilia and Calle El Segundo, south of Tahquitz- (137)
McCallum Way.
Director of Community Development reviewed his supple-
mental report, dated February 3, 1982, and stated that
following a meeting with the developer, a letter from
his attorney has been received indicating agreement with
the conditions which were attached to the time extension
by the Planning Commission.
Resolution 14134, granting the extension with conditions,
was presented; after which, it was moved by Rose, seconded
by Field, and unanimously carried, that Resolution 14134
be adopted.
3. AFCOM PROJECT - BLOWSAND PROTECTION WALL & LANDSCAPE PLAN
Recommendation: That the Council award contract for
construction of a blowsand protection wall and landscape
improvements north of San Rafael Drive, in Section 35,
to Little Grass Shack Landscape Co. , in amount of
$65,120.62.
Director of Community Development distributed sample (85)
showing color and style of fence proposed; and stated
that it was approved by the Architectural Advisory
Committee, and Council as part of the final development
plans for the project; that the natural rust was specified
in the bids and to change it to painted surface may
invalidate the bids.
C
Council Minutes
2-3-82 Page 7
3. AFCOM BLOWSAND PROJECT (Continued)
Councilwoman Ortner stated that she preferred the painted
beige version, and felt that because of the span of the
fence and the uncertainty of when development would take CONT'D
place in the area adjacent to it, the rust would not be (85)
as aesthetically pleasing.
Councilman Rose stated that from a cost standpoint, the
rusted steel would be cheaper than painted steel .
Mayor stated that the project has gone through the various
approval processes; and that the fence must not only be
able to withstand the environmental elements, but the
cost must be within reason, particularly, since the money
will come from Community Block Grant funds.
Minute Order 3049, awarding the contract as recommended,
was presented; after which, it was moved by Rose, seconded
by Doyle, and carried by the following vote, that Minute
Order 3049 be adopted:
APES: Field, Rose & Doyle
NO: Ortner
ABSENT: None
4. COMPREHENSIVE FEE SCHEDULE AMENDMENT - IN-LIEU PARKING FEE
Recommendation: That the Council amend the Comprehensive
Fee Schedule to increase the in-lieu parking fee from (114)
$7,200 to $9,250 per space.
Redevelopment Director reviewed his report, dated
February 3, 1982, detailing the procedures followed
and justification for increasing the fee.
Resolution 14135, amending the fee schedule as recommended,
was presented; after which, it was moved by Field, seconded
by Rose, and unanimously carried, that Resolution 14135
be adopted.
5. UNIFORM FIRE CODE AMENDMENTS
Recommendation: That the Council approve amendments to
the Uniform Fire Code, 1979 ed. , to provide fire and life
safety precautions for use of open flame devices within
public assembly facilities; and to add several occupancy
groups to the automatic fire sprinkler requirements. (87)
Division Chief detailed the recommended changes, as outlined
in Fire Chief's report dated February 3, 1982, and as
reviewed at the last study session, noting that the changes
relating to the open flame devices in public assembly
facilities will be incorporated into the 1982 ed. of the
UFC, but the Department felt it was appropriate to provide
the amendment to the local code at this time. He also
stated that occupancy groups to be added to the automatic
fire srinkler requirements include: repair garages, aircraft
hangars, schools, hospitals, carports, and agricultural
buildings.
City Clerk read title of the Ordinance, as follows:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFOkNIA,
AMENDING THE 1979 EDITION OF THE UNIFORM FIRE CODE.
It was moved by Field, seconded by Rose, and unanimously
carried, that further reading be waived, and that the
Ordinance be introdur_ad fnr fire* nnA4; n
426
Council Minutes
2-3-82 Page 8
6. MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENT - NORTH-SOUTH AXIS
Recommendation : That the Council amend the Municipal
Code to provide an exception to the established North-
South Axis or dividing line for street addressing, for (103
area between Vista Chino and Ramon Road.
City Clerk read title of the Ordinance, as follows:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CIT`! OF PALM SPRINGS„ CALIFORNIA,
PRESCRIBING CONSTRUCTION SITE AND BUILDING DIVISION
ADMINISTRATIVE REGULATIONS.
It was moved by Rose, seconded by Field, and unanimously
carried, that further reading be waived, and that the
Ordinance be introduced for first reading.
7. BLM LEASE - WHITEWATER REGIONAL PARK DEVELOPMENT
Recommendation: That the Council approve application
to lease 6,300 acres of land within the flood plain of
the Whitewater River Basin for purpose of developing
the Whitewater Regional Park.
Acting Director of Community Services stated that this
matter was reviewed in detail at the last study session
and that approval is being sought because of response (109)
by the BLM that if such action is not taken, •it will
have no recourse but to consider proposals being
made for wind farms in this area; and that relative to
rights under the lease, the City would have to agree
to any right-of-way requests for wind farm developments
before such would be granted by the BLM, and that the
City would not have any rights to subleasing the land
for profit, since it would be leasing the land without
monetary consideration; that the City would have five
years in which to complete the plan for development,
and if not so done, would risk losing the lease; and
that the City could relinquish the lease, in whole or
in part, during the five year period.
Resolution 14136, authorizing filing the application
as recommended, was presented; after which, it was
moved by Rose, seconded by Field, and unanimously
carried, that Resolution 14136 be adopted.
8„ NORTH RIVERSIDE DRIVE/CAMINO REAL - STOP INTERSECTION
Background: On December 16, 1981 , Council considered
need for additional stop signs at Camino Real and North
Riverside Drive, and continued the matter pending receipt
of public input.
Director of Community Development reviewed staff position (130)
which was previously presented to the Council , not to
support installation of the signs based on warrants.
Councilwoman Ortner stated that she feels strongly that
there is a need for the sign; and that her contacts with
residents in the area indicated dissatisfaction with the
Council 's attention to their problem.
Councilman Field stated that he has not heard from anyone
in the neighborhood, and that the matter was continued
with request that documentation be prepared in ;support
of the sign, which did not come forth; and that he felt
that charges of inattentiveness on the part of the Council
were less than fair, and that he was satisfied that the
warrants should guide the action to be taken. " '
Council Minutes I
2-3-82 Page 9 -
8. NORTH RIVERSIDE DRIVE/CAMINO REAL STOP INTERSECTION (Continued)
Councilman Rose concurred with Councilman Field, and
stated that other comments of non-responsiveness have
been made, yet this was an opportunity for people
to be heard and there was no advantage taken of it.
Councilwoman Ortner stated that regardless of testimony
from the residents, she believed the sign was necessary (130)
for protection to children using the crossing, and she
believed people had spoken in support of it previously.
Mayor stated that this matter had been continued its
order for people in favor of it to present that support
to the Council ; and that he has not received any telephone calls
or other communication in that regard.
It was moved by Ortner, seconded by Doyle, that the stop
signs be erected; said motion failed to carry by the
following vote:
AYES: Ortner
NOES: Field, Rose & Doyle
ABSENT: None
9. REDEVELOPMENT SURVEY AREAS NOS. 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8
Recommendation: That the Council designate redevelopment
survey areas 3 through 8. Note: See Community Redevelopment
Agency minutes this date for discussion. ;
(124 &
Resolution 14137, designating the areas as recommended, 133)
was presented; after which, it was moved by Field, seconded
by Ortner, and unanimously carried, that Resolution
14137 be adopted.
CONSENT AGENDA:
10. Resolution 14138 amending replacement policy for City (114)
equipment.
11 . Resolution 14139 granting underground easement to Southern (85 &
California Edison Co. , to provide service within AFCOM project. 147)
12. Resolution 14140 approving joint use agreement with Southern
California Edison Co. , to underground overhead facilities
along east side of Barona Road, southerly from Palm Canyon (147)
Drive, in conjunction with Desert Isle development.
13. Motion amending agreement with Richard J. Smith, dba Energy
Wise, and Resolution 14141 amending the Comprehensive Fee (112 &
Schedule, to reflect City collection of Plan-checking fees 114)
for energy standards, and to establish said fees.
14. Resolution 14142 declaring intent to amend Resolution of
Intention for Assessment District 133, re downtown mid-block (56)
crosswalks, to increase bond interest rate from 7% to 12%.
and set hearing thereon for March 3, 1982,
15. Minute Order 3050 approving Change Order $2 to contract with
Dillingham Construction Co'., increasing contract amount by (127)
$13,166, on behalf of the Public Facilities Corp.
16. Motion ordering the immediate abatement of public nuisance
at 1735 S. Palm Canyon Drive and 1732 Mesa Drive, and (57)
adjacent lots; and instructing Building & Safety Director
and City Attorney to petition local courts for an order to
abate.
428
Council Minutes
2-3-82 Page 10
17. Resolution 14143 approving final development plans for
Planned Development District 79, for single-family lot (116)
subdivision east of Bogert Trail , north of Andreas Hills
(J. Epstein).
'18. Minute. Order 3051 awarding purchase of three new trucks
to Trans-West Ford Truck Sales, Inc. , in amount of $45,363.13. (84)
19. Resolution 14144 approving Tentative Tract Map 18136,
industrial condominium conversion, for property on Vella ('137)
Road, between Sunny Dunes Road and Mesquite Avenue! - F. Onys.
20. Resolution 14145 approving Tentative Tract Map 18196,
industrial condominium conversion for property on (Williams (1137)
Road, south of Sunny Dunes Road - F, Onys.
21 . Minute Order 3052 awarding bid to furnish and install six
poles, with floodlights, at Angel Practice Field, 'to (1115)
Thorson Electric, Inc. , in amount of $40,210.
22. Resolution 14146 approving City paying portion of City
Manager's present employee contribution to Public Employees'
Retirement System.
23. Resolution 14147 and 14148 approving Payroll Warrants and (86)
Claims & Demands.
24. Resolution 14149 concurring in the action taken by Community
Redevelopment Agency this date. (124)
25. Resolution 14150 amending the budget, and Resolution 14151
approving Amendment No. 6 to Allocated Positions and Compensa-
tion Plans to approve addition of Keypunch Operator I for
Data Processing Department.
It was moved by Rose, seconded by Field, and unanimously
carried, that Resolutions 14138 through 14151 , motions
enumerated in Items 13 and 16 above, and Minute Orders
3050 through 3052 be adopted; Doyle abstaining on Res. 14142.
26. McCALLUM CIVIC BUILDING PARKING REQUIREMENTS
Recommendation: That the Council declare intent to fund
120 parking spaces to satisfy parking requirements for
the McCallum Civic Building.
City Manager stated that .question. was raised at the
last study session whether "intent" could be construed
as meaning commitment, and that the proposed resolution
has been revised to add the following language,
"This Resolution is an expression only of interest
and of good faith intention of the City Council , and (1117)
shall not be deemed a binding commitment of the City
of Palm Springs. "
Resolution 14152, declaring intent, incorporating above
language, was presented; after which, it was moved by
Rose, seconded by Field, and unanimously carried, that
Resolution 14152 be adopted.
-,l
Council Minutes
2-3-82 Page 11
27. TRACTS 12848 AND 13792 - FINAL MAPS
Resolution 14153 approving Final Tract Map 13792 for
property south of Paseo Azulejo and west of Calle
Morelos, Falcon Lake Properties; and (137)
Resolution 14154 approving Final Tract Map 12848 for
property on the east side of South Palm Canyon Drive
south of Bogert Trail , Stich Association of California,
were presented; after which, it was moved by Rose,
seconded by Field, and unanimously carried, that
Resolutions 14153 and 14154 be adopted.
28. TENNIS CENTER SUBLEASE
City Attorney statedthat following the last study session,
at which this matter was reviewed in detail , he met with
the proposed sublessee and his attorney, which indicated
that his first recommendation would lead to termination
of the project, and his alternate recommendation is to
approve the proposed letter submitted by the sublessee,
subject to revision of paragraph 2. , page 2, to read,
as follows:
"2. The City. . . . . .compensate me for my actual out-
of-pocket expenses incurred after February 3, 1982, (117)
in promoting. . . . "
and paragraph 3. , page 2, to read:
"3. The City further agrees that if the above-described
action as outlined in paragraph 1 has not been tried or
otherwise submitted to the court for decision on the
matter on or before August 15, 1982.. . . . . "
and final paragraph of the letter, to read:
". . . . .signed on behalf of the City and returning. . . . . "
He stated that he contacted the Superintendent of Schools
as to the prospect of filing declaratory relief action to
solve the issues, and that there is some question even if
the School Board acted perhaps the court action should be
pursued for a full resolution of the issue; that the
discussions were friendly and ended on a positive note,
with the Superintendent informing him that the Board
would meet on February 10, 1982; and that he may submit
a copy of the complaint to the District's attorney prior
to filing to assure that each entities positions are
accurately stated.
Councilman Rose stated that although there is still a
slight exposure on the part of the City, it is minor
compared to that of the sublessee, and he believed the
City was adequately protected.
Mr. Solomon was in the audience and verbally agreed to
the revised language as recited by the City Attorney.
It was moved by Rose, seconded by Field, and unanimously
carried, that letter, subject to the above revisions, be
approved as an addendum to the agreement.
430
Council Minutes
2-3-82 Page 12
REPORTS & REQUESTS:
29. DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS - Received & Ordered Filed
a) Treasurer's Monthly - October, 1981
30. CITY COUNCIL reports or requests
a) Ramon-Compadre Signal ;
Councilman Rose stated that he was aware of efforts
by St. Theresa 's members to raise $1 ,000 to help
defray cost of signal at this location, and expecta-
tion that a signal would be installed; that: discussions (130)
with the Traffic Engineer indicated several alternative
solutions, two of which were not acceptable to SunLine,
and the third would be a signal , with pedestrian
activated buttons; that the group actually raised
more than $1 ,000, and he was concerned that some
solution be found to resolve this issue, and perhaps
the project be budgeted for in 1982-83 or approve
funds at this time, if available.
Assistant City Manager stated that staff agrees that
the signal should be installed, however, the timing
is such that it would not be completed much before
the end of the school year, and that the same purpose
may be served if the design phase were to proceed
at this time, funds provided in 1982-83 budget, and
construction comr:enced' in order to have the signal
operational at the start of the Fall semester.
It was moved by Rose, seconded by Ortner, and unani-
mously carried, that staff proceed with specifications
and that funds be included in the 1982-83 budget for
this project.
b) Councilman Rose stated that request has been made
by the Men's Golf Club to enable members to start
play at an earlier hour than 11 a.m. at the Municipal
Golf Course; that its membership has increased to the
point where it is not possible for members to complete
a round of golf before dark; that they believe the (92)
City will not lose any revenue as a result of this,
and would like a trial program on Mondays during a
given period, which could then be compared to the
same period in the previous year to determine the
impact; and that the Parks & Golf Course Superintendent
takes the position that there will be a net loss, however,
he believed the assumption should be validated and felt
the trial period was worth exploring.
Councilman Field stated that such a request has been
made previously and there was no support for it;
that he would not be supportive at this time; and
that such a request should be processed through the
Community Services Commission.
Councilwoman Ortner concurred with Councilman Field,
and stated that she would not support such action
without a recommendation by the Community Services
Commission.
Mayor stated that he had previously thought the idea
was worth trying for one or two Mondays in a month,
but not every Monday.
Mayor directed staff to present this request to the
43
Council Minutes
2-3-82 Page 13
c) Mayor stated that he has received a number of calls
and was concerned as to the condition of Sunny Dunes
Road, from Sunrise to Palm Canyon, as a result of
the crack seal program.
31 . PUBLIC reports or requests - None
32. STAFF reports or requests - None
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business at 10:30 p.m. , Mayor
declared the meeting adjourned; Council to meet with
the Community Services Commission and Library Board
at dinner to be held February 8, 1982, at the Sheraton
Oasis.
SUD ITH SUMICH
City Clerk