HomeMy WebLinkAbout1/20/1982 - MINUTES CITY OF PALM SPRINGS
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
JANUARY 20, 1982
A Regular Meeting of the City Council was called to order by
Mayor Doyle, in the Council Chamber, 3200 Tahquitz-McCallum Way,
on Wednesday, January 20, 1982, at 7:30 p.m.
ROLL CALL: Present: Councilmembers Field, Ortner, Rose and
Mayor Doyle
Absent: None
The meeting was opened with the salute to the Flag.
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY : Mayor declared the meeting
adjourned for the purpose of convening as the Community Redevelop-
ment Agency; after which, members reconvened as the City Council .
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
It was moved by Field, seconded by Rose, and unanimously
carried, that the minutes of December 30, 1981 and
January 6, 1982, be approved.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1 . P.D. 136 - RACQUET CLUB NORTH, LTD.
Recommendation: That the Council approve a planned
development district for a commercial complex on the
NE corner of North Palm Canyon Drive and Racquet Club
Road.
Director of Community Development stated that the site
contains five acres; that a planned development district
is being used in order to combine two zones; that issue
of widening the N1 of Racquet Club Road was raised, and
the Planning Commission thought that the right-of-way was (116)
needed and the widening necessary to handle traffic that
will be generated; that the proposed resolution was revised
to require the applicant to pay for all cost incurred to
acquire the right-of-way; and that as a result of discussion
at the last study session, it was recommended that the
Council also adopt the following motion:
That in conjunction with the approval of P.D. 136
and after the developer had made his best effort
to acquire needed right-of-way, the City would use
its authority to acquire said right-of-way subject
to conditions as outlined in the resolution of
approval of P.D.D. 136 and subject to commencement
of construction of improvements within 90 days of
the acquisition.
In answer to questions by Council , Director of Community
Development stated that a condition of approval was that
the developer install the improvements once the right-of-
way is acquired; that if the developer could not acquire
the right-of-way, then the City would use its power of
eminent domain to do so, and if such is the case, then
the developer would pay for the cost of acquisition, plus
the cost of installation of the improvements; and that if
neither the developer nor the City acquires the right-of-way,
then there would be no improvement.
Council Minutes
1 .20-82 Page 2
1 . P.D. 136 (Continued)
In answer to question by Council , City Attorney stated
that a public statement of intent to acquire the property
triggers certain rights on the part of the property
owner, e.g. , requiring City to acquire the property
if condemnation is not commenced within six months.
In answer to question by Council , Director of Com-
munity Development stated that there are no guidelines
regarding Desert Water Agency 's water conservation
ordinance; that it is anticipated that landscape plans
will not result in water running into the street; and
that landscape plans will be part of the final develop-
ment plans to be reviewed by the Architectural Advisory
Committee and Planning Commission.
Mayor declared the hearing open.
Richard Smith, Eisner-Smith Associates, representing
the applicant, stated that the planned development
district process is being used as vehicle for providing
a better project; that there is no objection to paying
for off-site improvements which will result in widening
and completing the street from Indian Avenue to Palm
Canyon Drive; that the question of who pays and who
acquires has not been adequately resolved; and that the
developer will remove any portion of whatever type of
structure exists with regard to Cortez Road that is
on the property, details of which can be worked out
in the final development plans.
Bob Best, President of Westar, stated that there would CONT'D
be no objection to restoring the entire portion of (116)
Cortez Road to a natural state, as long as there was
approval by the adjoining property owner; that the
uses proposed are allowed by right of zone; that there
has been a great amount of residential development in
the NJ of the City, but a lack of commercial development;
that the uses proposed will benefit the residents in
the area, and reduce traffic congestion by people having
to travel southerly to meet shopping needs ; and that
petitions containing over 204 signatures in favor •of
the project were presented to the Planning Commission.
Sam Wilcox, Long Beach, co-owner of the project, spoke
in favor, stating that he has had to provide dedications
for both commercial and residential properties, in order
to receive street improvement benefits ; that he did not
see why the property owner should be paid for a benefit
which they will receive; and that the property owner
will benefit and be able to sell the property with
those improvements already installed.
Raul Young, representing architect for the project,
indicated his availability to respond to questions.
Mel Bigelow, 360 W. Racquet Club Road, stated that he
supports the project and believes it would be a great
benefit to the northern portion of the City; that he
has concerns about dust control , as well as widening
of the street; that although his house is for sale,
if the street is widened, he will still have to live
there; that widening will result in a loss of parking,
create a safety hazard, and bring the street to within
7 feet of the house; and that he has not been approached
by the developer as to how to take care of the problem.
Council Minutes
1-20-82 Page 3
1 . P.D. 136 (Continued)
Dana Bigelow, 360 W. Racquet Club Road, stated that there
would only be a 4-ft wall between her property and the
project, which would leave her feeling insecure in terms
of people being able to passby and look into her home; that
in order to have access to her garage, it will be necessary
to remove a wall and build a driveway from the front yard
to the backyard; that widening the street will place her
front window 10-ft from the street; that she did not believe
it will be possible to sell the property as a residence;
that she believed the area eventually would be commercial ;
and that the only communication received concerning the
street has been from the City.
Dean Gastger, 389 Cabrillo, stated that the opening onto
Palm Canyon Drive should be wider, and that there should
not be an opening on Cortez Road, into the residential
area,
Paul Selzer, Best, Best & Krieger, attorney representing
developer, stated that everyone appears to be concerned
about Condition #8; that when the developer first: approached
the City, it was recognized that there was a problem with
the street, and the developer indicated willingness to pay
for the improvement after acquisition of the right-of-way;
that the street has been shown on the General Plan Street
Plan as a secondary thoroughfare since 1965, and the right-of-
way should have been acquired years ago by the City; that
petitions in favor of the '.project, containing 204--signatures,
were presented to the Planning Commission; that it is clearly
a public benefit that the street be widened; that, it is unfair
that the developer should have to acquire the right-of-way CONT 'D
and any expense in connection therewith should be at public (116)
expense; that he :believed the property owners desired to
develope the property as a commercial use and to have the
improvements that they would otherwise have to install as
any other developer would have to install ; and that although
the Director of Community Developer has indicated that the
position of staff and the Commission has consistently been
that the developer pay for the cost of the property, the
Commission 's recommendation was that upon acquisition of
the right-of-way, the developer install the improvements.
He stated that the developer's understanding all along has
been that the City would acquire the right-of-way and
the developer would pay for the improvements; that the
developer has had discussions with the Bigelows and they
have indicated they would sell the entire property for
$300,000; and that perhaps the improvement can be
accomplished through an assessment district.
City Manager stated that he believed there was an honest
misunderstanding as to the use of words; that he read the
original language as placing the requirement of acquisition
upon the developer, but later reading suggested that it
might be interpreted differently, and the new language
was developed; that the new wording apparently dogs not
mesh with the understanding of the applicant; that; staff
was not recommending the use of an assessment district,
which would relieve the burden on the developer and
place it on benefitting property owners ; that a reimburse-
ment agreement may be possible, which would enable the
developer to recover costs as other properties are developed;
and that he understood Council concerns at the study session
related to d time frame and, if necessary, that the City
would use its legal authority to acquire the property.
Council Minutes
1-20-82 Page 4
1 . P.D. 136 (Continued)
Mr. Selzer stated that the Planning Director gave a clear
negative response to the specific question of whether the
developer would be required to acquire the property.
Director of Community Development stated that there have
been a number of discussions about this issue and there
was no clear definition as to who would acquire the
property; that the possibility of a reimbursement agreement
and use of assessment district was also discussed, but it
was not clearcut that the City would pay for it; that
efforts were made to attempt to get the right-of-way
from the property owners if a benefit could be shown;
that if the developer offered to pay for the right-of-way
and the property owner were willing to sell it, then
the developer had the ability to acquire it; that he
believed it was clear that when a development occurs
and forces an improvement to take place, the cost of
that becomes a part of the cost of the development; that
the use of reimbursement agreements for off-site improve-
ments is not unusual ; and that he believed the proposed
language indicated the City would work toward acquisition,
but that the cost of same was not a valid one for the
C ity.
In answer to question by Council , Planning Director
stated that this was not the only issue discussed
relating to the project; that he was approached by
Mr. Smith about the wording relating to the potential CONT 'D
improvements, and apparently it was not clear; that (116)
the project should not go in without the street improve-
ments and the street improvements cannot be constructed
without the right-of-way; that the proposed language does
not mandate that the developer, personally, acquire the
right-of-way, but leaves it to the best possible solution,
either the City or developer; that the Right-of-Way Agent
believed that the cost would be paid by the developer;
and that the main issue was not who was to pay, but how
the property would be obtained and who would get it,
which was left open for either party to negotiate.
There being no further appearances, the hearing was
closed.
In answer to question by Council , Mr. Smith stated that
the developer was concerned that discussion regarding this
matter might lead to a continuance or a referral to �:he
Planning Commission, which was not their intent; that
the only question to resolve is who pays for the acquisition;
and that there are other possibilities, e.g. , an assessment
district.
Councilwoman Ortner stated that she did not think it was
fair to make the developer pay for the acquisition, which
is a benefit to the community, and would like to have the
matter referred to staff to see if alternatives can be.
wored out.
Mr. Smith stated that they would agree to pay for the acquisition
costs, under protest, with understanding that perhaps an assess-
ment district could be established.
4�0.
Council Minutes
' -20-82 Page 5
1 . P.D. 136 (Continued)
Following discussion, the City Attorney suggested that a
motion, in addition to the proposed resolution, be CONT'D
adopted, as follows :
(116)
"If necessary to enable developer to comply with
conditions of approval of POD #136 (Racquet Club
North, Ltd) , within a reasonable time after notice
that the developer has used its best efforts, but
is unable to acquire the necessary right-of-way, it
is the intent of the City Council that the City will
acquire such right-of-way, subject to reimbursement
of all costs and expenses of such acquisition, as
provided in the resolution of approval and developer
shall commence construction of required street
improvements within 90 days after notice that City
has acquired the needed right-of-way; provided that
the above shall not preclude use of assessment
district proceedings. "
Resolution 14119, approving the district, was presented;
after which, it was moved by Field, seconded by Rose,
and unanimously carried, that Resolution 14119 and the
above motion as recited by the City Attorney be adopted.
2. GENERAL PLAN STREET PLAN AMENDMENT - BELARDO ROAD
Recommendation: That the Council amend the General Plan
Street Plan to change Belardo Road, from Morongo Road to
South Palm Canyon Drive, from a secondary thoroughfare
to a collector street. (COUNCILWOMAN ORTNER ABSTAINED)
Director of Community Development reviewed his report,
dated January 20, 1982, and stated that some opposition (101 )
had been received from the Tribal Council , in that it
did not feel the designation should be changed until
the traffic study, currently under contract, is completed,
and that consideration should be given to redesignating
the street to its prior 1970 location. He illustrated
the impact the Tribal Council recommendation would have
on existing development, as well as its relationship
to properties in 1970; and noted that, at this time, it
would not be feasible to restore the location to that
shown in 1970, without destroying the back portion of the
Vagabond Hotel .
In answer to questions by Council , Director of Community
Development stated that portion to Mesquite Avenue will
be constructed at 80-ft; that it will tie into Morongo
Road, with traffic proceeding easterly to signal at
Palm Canyon Drive; that the traffic study may result
in some recommendations for the back portion of the
property, but the Commission felt confident in recommending
a reduction at least to Morongo Road; and that development
of the property is expected to occur after completion of
the traffic study.
Mayor declared the hearing open.
John Wessman, 72200 Clancy Lane, Rancho Mirage, developer,
spoke in favor of the Commission 's recommendation, and stated
that Morongo Road will be 80-ft wide; that he had extensive
trafficstudies made for the area, including traffic from
the canyon area and the potential use of Belardo Road as
a by-pass, which indicated that the street should be 80-ft
from Ramon Road to Morongo Road, with a narrowing south of
Council Minutes
1-20-82 Page 6
2. GENERAL PLAN STREET PLAN AMENDMENT (Continued)
Morongo Road, which would deter people from proceeding
southerly; and that it was possible to erect a sign CONT 'D
before the Morongo intersection, that through traffic (101 )
to Highway Ill should use Morongo Road.
There being no further appearances, the hearing was
closed.
Resolution 14120, approving the amendment as recommended,
was presented; after which, it was moved by Rose, seconded
by Field, and unanimously carried, that Resolution 14120
be adopted; Ortner abstained.
3. DEPARTMENTAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODES
Recommendation : That the Council approve amendments to
Fire, General Operations, and Community Development Depart-
ments Conflict of Interest Codes, to reflect changes and additions in
job classifications of designated employees.
Mayor declared the hearing open; there being no appearances,
the hearing was closed. (63)
Minute Order 3044, approving the amendments was presented;
after which, it was moved by Ortner, seconded by Field, and
unanimously carried, that Minute Order 3044 be adopted.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
a) John Weston, 1077 Capistrano Court, stated that he
was aware of Councilwoman Ortner's intent to suggest
that the Council consider a commission or committee
to act as a liaison between the Council and Police
Department, and urged that the Council not take
any action until after the Municipal Election, and
that it be an issue to be addressed by the new Council .
b) Robert Fey, 2000 Madrona, reiterated some of his
previous comments regarding method of calculation
for the School Impact Fee, and stated that driving
up the cost of construction will chase development
out of the City.
c) Allen Perrier, attorney representing developer of
Tract 16544, stated that in the extension of tract
maps, absent approval of the developer, the Council
does not have the ability to add conditions; that (137)
there would be no objection to the mobilehome park
closure impact analysis, if other matters could be
worked out; that there may be significant changes
to the master plan for drainage, and the condition
should be changed to require the fee established
for Zone 2; and that regarding the School Impact
Fee, he did not believe it reasonable to require
a fee when the amount is unknown. He stated that
the developer is desirous of having the issues
resolved, and to obtaining a 2-year extension of
the map.
i P-I-A
Council Minutes
-20-82 Page 7
LEGISLATIVE ACTION :
4. TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 16544 - TIME EXTENSION
Recommendation: That the Council approve 2-year time
extension for the above map, for condominium project
on property between Calle Encilia and Calle E1 Segundo,
south of Tahquitz-McCallum Way; matter was continued
from December 16, 1981 , at request of applicant„
Director of Community Development stated that written
consent has not been received from the applicant;
relating to the additional conditions for granting (137)
the extension, and that in the absence of a verbal
consent this date, he would not recommend granting
the extension, in which case the map would be null
and void, and the applicant would have to start over.
He stated that he would not be opposed to a continuance
of this item, if the applicant were willing to pursue
a better position with regard to the additional condi-
tions.
It was moved by Ortner, seconded by Rose, and unanimously
carried, that this matter be continued to February 3,
1982, to permit further discussion by the applicant
with staff regarding the conditions for granting the
extension.
5. POLICE PATROL VEHICLES
City Manager recommended deferring action to consider
cancelling contract to purchase fourteen police vehicles ,
until the process of seeking bids for a larger model
is completed, and both items can be considered at one (84)
time; after which, it was moved by Field, seconded by ,
Rose, and unanimously carried, that this matter be
tabled.
6. COMBS-GATES PALM SPRINGS, INC. - SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT
Recommendation : That the Council approve Supplemental
Agreement No. 2 to Agreement 684 with Combs-Gates Palm
Springs, Inc. , fora Fixed base operation at the Airport.
(51 )
Transportation Director reviewed his report, .dated
January 20, 1982, in particular Attachment 3 thereto,
detailing the changes proposed by the supplement:.
In answer to questions by Council , Transportation
Director stated that Jimsair has a 1981 value of
$45,000 per acre; that Combs-Gates had a $22,000
per acre value in 1969; that applying the CPI to
the Combs-Gates agreement, the value would be about
$48,000 per acre currently from 1969 to this date;
that assuming a 100% increase in CPI, the increase
for Combs-Gates would be about 51% and 35% for Jimsair
over the same period; that the two rents are comparable;
and that because of the low base rent for Combs-Gates,
a 100 point increase for Combs-Gates would mean more
in terms of dollars, than it would for Jimsair for the
same point increase.
Resolution 14121 , approving the supplement as recommended,
was presented; after which, it was moved by Ortner,
seconded by Rose, and unanimously carried, Field abstaining,
that Resolution 14121 be adopted.
4-
1-Council Minutes
1-20-82 Page 8
7. WHITEWATER RIVER CORRIDOR MASTER PLAN
Recommendation: That the Council authorize the City
Manager to enter into agreement with the Regional
Desert Design Group of Cal Poly Pomona to prepare the
Whitewater River Corridor Master Plan in an amount
of $9,250.
Acting Director of Community Services reviewed his (109)
report, dated January 12, 1982, and in answer to
questions by Council , stated that the study should
take about 5 months to complete; and that other
types of feasibility studies would be needed to
determine the impact on other city services, regarding
the impact of Bureau of Land Management (BLM) lease.
City Manager stated that the concept of leasing from
BLM is anticipated to come to the Council at its. ,
next meeting; that there are many other non-land use
issues which need to be addressed, and those could be
handled somewhat concurrently with the proposed master
plan study; that the Planning Commission will need to
become involved at some point; and that, although the
possibility of seeking consultant assistance has not:
be discussed, he would not want to forego that possibility.
Councilwoman Ortner stated that it was her understanding
that pursuing the feasibility study would follow the
master plan.
Councilman Rose requested that staff investigate the comment
which was made to him that there was a possibility
according to POST that the City could lose the ability
of getting the property.
Minute Order 3045, authorizing City Manager to enter
into agreement, as recommended, was presented; after
which, it was moved by Field, seconded by Ortner, and
unanimously carried, that Minute Order 3045 be adopted.
8. SCHOOL IMPACT MITIGATION FEE
Mayor reported request by the School District that this
matter be further continued; after which, it was moved
by Field, secconded by Rose, and unanimously carried,
that this matter be continued to February 17, 1982,
per request of the School District. (114)
CONSENT AGENDA:
9. Resolution 14122 authorizing City Clerk to accept deed
executed by Jean Marie Kapp, for 20 acre parcel in Section (127)
20, in connection with future percolation ponds for the
Wastewater Treatment Plant.
10. Resolution 14123 amending the budget to appropriate $4,000
to install a fire detection system and modify existing (61 )
security system at Angel Stadium.
11 . Resolution 14124 approving Tentative Parcel Map 14063 to
combine property on Camino Monte Vista between N. Palm Canyon 0 19)
Drive and Indian Avenue, commercial building, KWL/A. Yermian.
12. Resolution 14125 approving Tentative Tract Map 17470
for property east of Bogert Trail , north of Andreas Hills (137)
13 lots, Webb/J. Epstein.
13. Resolution 14126 approving Tentative Tract Map 18126 (137)
for property on Vista Chino, between Cerritos Road and Sunrise
Way, 1-lot for condominium purposes, Ervin/J. Cain:
3
Council Minutes
1-2'0-82 Page 9
14. Resolution 14127 approving Tentative Tract Map 18302
for property on the SW corner of Morongo Trail and Araby (137)
Drive, for condominium purposes, Hacker/J . Snedaker.
15„ Resolution 14128 approving destruction of certain recordings
of telephone and radio communications. (151 )
16,. Resolution 14129 approving destruction of specific,: City
Clerk records, which are at least two years old, primarily (151 )
dated prior to 1975.
17. Minute Order 3046 awarding purchase of a gooseneck trailer (84)
to Bebco, in amount of $7,516.46.
18. Minute Order 3047 awarding purchase of #2 diesel fuel to
Spartan oil Co. , in amount of $1 .001 per gallon delivered. (84)
19. Resolution 14130 and 14131 , approving Payroll Warrants and
Claims & Demands. (86)
It was moved by Rose, seconded by Field, and unanimously
carried, that Resolutions 14122 through 14131 and Minute
Orders 3046 and 3047 be adopted.
20. PARCEL MAP 17845 - TENTATIVE MAP
Recommendation : That the Council approve Tentative Parcel
Map 17845 to combine property on Highway 111 , between Calle
Palo Fierro and Via Salida, H. Hupe.
Director of Community Development stated that the Planning
Commission approved the tentative map and the conditional
use permit for the restaurant, in one motion, subject to
conditions, which were then carried through with the
tenative map in presenting it to Council ; that question
was raised at the last study session regarding the use of (1.19)
in-lieu parking fees; that under the Code, the applicant
has the discretion of in-lieu fees for up to six spaces;
that a revised plan was submitted subsequent to Planning
Commission approval of the permit, which reduced the
deficiency to one space; that he did not think -it appropriate
to change that discretion mid-stream for this project, but
that staff will be looking at the Code provision which
seems inappropriate to use in-lieu since mitigation of
parking deficiencies in such single areas seems unlikely;
and that he would recommend amending condition #1 of the
proposed resolution to require a $7,200 in-lieu fee per
deficient parking space. Ile stated that the parking
deficiency may be totally resolved when final development
plans are submitted.
Resolution 14132, approving the map, as recommended and
revising condition #1 thereof as recommended, was presented;
after which, it was moved by Field, seconded by Rose, and
unanimously carried, that Resolution 14132 be adopted.
L
4
Council Minutes
-20-82 Page 10
21 . TENNIS CENTER - SUBLEASE
Recommendation: That the Council approve sublease with
Stephen A. Solomon, for operation of the Tennis Center,
and not seek School District ratification.
City Manager stated that letter from the proposed
sublessee, together with County Counsel and City
Attorney opinions, were reviewed at the last study
session; and that if a challenge were to be made (117)
by the School District, it would be in everyone's
best interest that it do so soon, and if the recommenda-
tion is approved, the District will be notified that
the City considers this to be a valid lease and to
proceed from there.
Councilman Rose stated that he had no problem in
going forward with the sublease and defending against
any action bought by the School District, but questioned
whether the City could be placed in such a position that
if the District were successful in any such action that
the sublessee could bring an action against the City
that it gave something which it did not have a right
to give, and, if so, whether there should be a written
waiver from the sublessee to that right.
City Attorney stated that both such actions
would be possible, and that there would be a potential
for the sublessee if he had spent any money in reliance
on the lease prior to resolution of any contest between
the City and School District. He stated that he was
not aware of any language in the lease which addressed
that eventuality.
Councilman Rose stated that unless that type of
agreement were provided by the sublessee, it would
not be appropriate for the Council to approve the
action recommended.
Minute Order 3048, approving the sublease and not
seeking School District approval , was presented; after
which, it was moved by Rose, seconded by Field, and
unanimously carried, that Minute Order 3048 be adopted,
subject to sublessee agreeing not to bring action against
the City in the event of a successful action by the
School District against the City; language of such
agreement to be satisfactory to the City Attorney.
22. MOSQUITO ABATEMENT DISTRICT - APPOINTMENT
It was moved by Field, seconded by Rose, and unanimously
carried, that John Turlo be reappointed to the Board of (60)
Trustees of the Coachella Valley Mosquito Abatement
District for the term ending December 31 , 1983.
Council Minutes
1-20-82 Page 11
REPORTS & REQUESTS:
23. DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS - Received & Ordered Filed
a) CVB - lst quarterly, 1981-82
b) Treasurer's Monthly - July, August, September, 1981
24. CITY COUNCIL reports or requests
a) Councilwoman Ortner requested that staff determine
whether bus service is being provided for tenants
in the AFCOM project, and stated that there does not
appear to be any service and it is needed.
b) Councilwoman Ortner requested that the Council endorse
the concept of a police community relations board, and
direct staff to prepare necessary actions for implementation;
that the primary purpose of the board would be to create
alternate lines of communication between the community
and the Police Department and to enhance those which
currently exist, and to restore traditional community
understanding that the Police Department works to help (113)
the community in solving its problems and meeting com-
munity needs. She stated that she believed it would
reduce tensions and misunderstandings by responding to
both police and community needs, and provide the means
for both to express their concerns; that the board would
be able to anticipate and prevent problems which occur
through a lack of communication; and that she believed
it should be comprised of responsible spokesmen from
the community.
Mayor stated that he was not prepared at this time to
endorse such a proposal , and would like to see this
matter be the subject of a non-agenda study session,
to examine that which is currently being done vs. that
which Mrs. Ortner would like to see come about; that
in looking at additional boards or commissions, it is
necessary to look at additional personnel to staff such
groups; and that he felt it was also important for the
Council to hear from the Police Chief and the Community
Affairs Officer as to their perspectives.
Councilwoman Ortner requested that this item be discussed
at a future study session or Council meeting.
c) Councilman Rose stated that he still has concerns as to
the viability of the chip seal program, and illustrated
recent experience relating to chip seal dust on Suntan
Lane.
(136;1
City Manager stated that staff is still evaluating the
program, and results will be reported back to the Council .
d) Councilman Rose requested that when the issue of the
School Impact Fee is brought to the Council again, that (114)
there be discussion addressing the question of
methodology used in arriving at the fee.
Council Minutes
1-20-82 Page 12
e) Councilman Rose commented on the effect of morale on
police officers as a result of legal inability to
release certain information regarding actions taken
by fellow officers; that he felt it was important
that the officers be aware of the support and regard
with which they are held by the Council ; and he (113)
would like to indicate that support in some formal
manner. He moved that the Council adopt a motion
commending and supporting the Police Department; said
motion failed for lack of a second.
Mayor stated that he met with the officers in one
of their briefing sessions, and explained the role
of the City in attempting to put to rest the incident
which incurred at the Gene Autry Hotel ; that he sent
a letter expressing unqualified support of the department,
with indication that a similar letter would be sent to
the editor of the newspaper; and that he felt if Council-
members wanted to show support of the department then
they should attend one of the briefing sessions and
express their interest.
f) Councilwoman Ortner stated that she attended a session
with the police officers, and indicated that she had
discussed her proposal for a police community relations (113)
board about one year ago, and that she felt they were
receptive to her comments and her attending the session.
25. PUBLIC reports or requests - None
26. STAFF reports or requests - None
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business at 10 p.m. , Mayor declared
the meeting adjourned.
g � aITH SUMICH
City Clerk