HomeMy WebLinkAbout3/18/1981 - MINUTES CITY OF PALM SPRINGS
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
MARCH 18, 1981
A Regular Meeting of the City Council was called to order by
Mayor Doyle, in the Council Chamber, 3200 Tahquitz-McCallum
Way, on Wednesday, March 18, 1981 , at 7:30 p.m.
ROLL CALL: Present: Councilmembers Beirich, Field, Rose,
Ortner and Mayor Doyle
Absent: None
The meeting was opened with the salute to the Flag and an invoca-
tion by Rabbi Joseph Hurwitz, Temple Isaiah.
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY: Mayor declared the meeting
adjourned for the purpose of convening as the Community
Redevelopment Agency; after which, members reconvened as the
City Council .
APPROVAL OF MINUTES :
It was moved by Beirich, seconded by Rose, and unani-
mously carried, that the minutes of March 4, 1981 be
approved.
PUBLIC HEARINGS :
1 . ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT - TIME SHARE
Director of Community Development reviewed his report
dated March 18, 1981 , and reported Planning Commission
recommendation to amend the Zoning Ordinance to
require a conditional use permit to allow a time share (103)
project in the City. lie stated that time share projects
would be permissable in basically hotel , commercial
and A zones , and in G-R-5 and R-2 whenever the subject
site in either zone fronts on a major or secondary
thoroughfare as indicated on the General Plan. He
highlighted provisions of the pytiposed ordinance,
including conversions and areas of consideration by
the Planning Commission in recommending allowing time
share projects, and noting that any project would require
a conditional use permit.
Mayor declared the hearing open.
Jim Stewart, 155 W. Hermosa Place, spoke in support
of the recommendation, and commended staff, task
force members, and the Commission for their work.
There being no further appearances, Mayor declared
the hearing closed.
In answer to question by Council , Director of Com-
munity Development stated that it was not the intent
of the ordinance that a small number of people could
effectuate a change to time share, but that could
happen; that the ordinance provides that at least
one-half of the people in the project be notified,
and if they do not wish to speakup, it would be
uncertain as to how much protection could be
given; and that the homeowners ' associations can
amend their CCRs to preclude any time share within
the project.
Council Minutes
3-18-81 Page 2
1 . ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT - TIME SHARE (Continued)
Councilman Field stated that this matter was thoroughly
reviewed at the last study session, in particular,
the aspect of "erosion" and that the various controls
in the ordinance would be attended to, and remembered,
in the future and the intent of the ordinance would
not be obscured.
Councilman Rose stated that he would support the ordi-
nance, although, if it could be legally upheld, he
would support preventing time share in Palm Springs,
since he feels it is full of problems and it -is not the
same as a hotel ; that a hotel owned by a chain or
individual operator is operated for profit, meaning CONT 'D
that it will be kept up; and that he was not convinced
that time share properties will be maintained over (103)
the long haul , in the manner in which the City would
wish for them to be maintained.
Mayor stated that he was not that excited about the
time share concept, however, he felt a good job has
been done in addressing it, in Darticular, fact that
many wanted controls and restrictions and the condi-
tional use permit addresses that aspect. He also
stated that, although conditional use permits do
not come to the Council for approval , any Council-
member may request that a permit approved by the
Commission come to the Council for consideration.
City Manager read title of Ordinance, as follows :
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS,
CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING ZONING REGULATIONS
RELATING TO THE USE OR OCCUPANCY OF LAND ON A
"TIME-SHARE" BASIS.
It was moved by Ortner, seconded by Beirich, and unani-
mously carried, that further reading be waived and
that the Ordinance be introduced for first reading.
2. P.D. 122 - L. HESS
Director of Community Development reviewed his report;
dated March 18, 1981 , and reported Planning Commission
recommendation to approve a planned development district, (116)
in-lieu of a change of zone, to allow professional
office building on the SW corner of Cahuilla Road and
Tahquitz-McCallum Way. He stated that project was
originally approved as P.D. 103, however, revised
plans were submitted resulting in a 50% increase in
floor area and conversion of surface parking to
underground parking; and that the proposed plan
called for a two-space in-lieu parking payment, however,
the Planning Commission recommendation includes condi-
tion that required parking be provided.
Mayor declared the hearing open.
David Christian, architect for the project, stated
that only one neighbor opposed the project; that there
will be surface parking; that the complex is intended
for office use; and that he believes the underground
parking will better serve the project and provide a
better buffer, together with the landscaping, than
that which was previously provided.
Council Minutes
3-18-81 Page 3
2. P.D. 122 (Continued)
In answer to questions by Council , Mr. Christian slated
that vehicles will have to accelerate to come up the
ramp grade, which may cause additional noise, however,
they have tried to provide relief in the way of landscaped
area and light wells which should reduce the sound,
and he did not believe there would be much sound loss
going out of the structure per se; that the question
of security has come up and they are not planning
a controlled access garage, and rather than vehicle
security, the question may relate to a problem of
someone seeking shelter ; that, in his opinion, the
structure would not be detrimental in terms of noise;
that the applicant desires the Council to re-evaluate
the parking deficiency and allow the two in-lieu spaces ;
and that there was not a problem in terms of drainage
issues for the project, although his personal philosophy
was that it would be many years before there would
be a functioning system of drainage.
Lawrence Ritter, attorney representing the Winters,
who live next door to the subject site, stated that
they are not opposed to the underground parking con-
cept; that since this will be the only one of its
kind in the R-3 zone in this area, it needs to be
treated more sensitively in terms of architecture
and public safety; that there has been no change in
architectural style of the building, although he
felt the Council had concerns regarding style when
it reviewed the project previously; that the Council CONT°D
previously indicated it was not in favor of in-lieu (116)
parking for the project; that the Winters ' bedroom
window is 51 feet from the street and will be over
the parking ramp; that he understood that the staff
did not consider other locations of the ramp; that
moving the ramp further north would eliminate sharp
right turns for cars coming and going from the lot;
that light wells are open to pedestrian accidents;
and that consideration of aesthetic,s 'over public
safety would be in error.
In answer to questions by Council , Police Chief
stated that underground garages without controlled
access are considered to be high crime areas; and
that it would appear the project may be building in
some crime hazards, but there are underground un-
controlled garages now in the City. He stated that
he did not have any data concerning crime statistics
relating to the Diplomat, which has underground
parking, however, frequent in and out trips are
an advantage to cause a mugger to wait for
his victim.
Mr. Christian stated that they have tried to avoid
a "dark box" and if there is concern about pedestrian
accidents, the light wells area can be protected by
metal grates; that projects contemplated west of the
subject site will increase traffic on Tahquitz-McCallum
Way; that he felt they could provide the area open
a good part of the day, and could deal with security
items at. night, _if necessary. He stated that the
concrete finish texture would reduce possibility of
tire squeeling.
There being no further appearances, the hearing was
closed.
Council Minutes
3-18-81 Page 4
2. P.D. 122 (Continued)
Councilman Rose stated that he recalled concerns of
the neighbors last year and concerns relating to the
mass of the building, and felt that a solution had
been reached which was acceptable; that he has con-
cerns that the noise will not be eliminated, although
it could be reduced; that he was concerned about the
potential possibility of crime and whether a totally
bright conditioncould be maintained, even with lights;
and that he felt a prior commitment was made, which
the proposed project would reverse, and he could not
support it.
Councilwoman Ortner stated that she could support
the project if acceptable lighting and night security CONT'D
can be developed, and there is no in-lieu parking (116)
allowed.
Mayor stated that he felt the project had merit, however,
he was concerned with some of the conditions ; and that
if the safety concerns can be mitigated, he would support
the project.
Councilman Beirich stated that he was concerned about
the increased intensified use of the property, over
that which was agreed upon in P.D. 103, which he felt
was as much as was desired, as well as architectural
concerns; and that the underground parking is a trade-
off for a larger building, which would be acceptable,
if it were not for the prior commitment to the area
and neighbors.
Councilman Field stated that he has concerns regarding
the impact on the neighbors, security, and in-lieu
parking; and that he would favor referring the matter
back to the Planning Commission for reconsideration.
It was moved by Field, seconded by Doyle, and carried
by the following vote, that this matter be referred
back to the Planning Commission for consideration of
concerns expressed by Council relating to neighbors,
security, in-lieu parking, and other concerns detected
by staff as a result of above discussion:
AYES: Field, Ortner &. Doyle
NOES: Beirich & Rose
ABSENT: None
3. AA CASE 3.390 - AUTOMATIC APPEAL ON DENIAL
Mayor reported request by applicant to continue con-
sideration of Planning Commission denial for archi-
tectural approval to enclose an existing breezeway
in an apartment project at 520 Murray Canyon Drive
to the next meeting. He inquired if anyone wished
to be heard, there were no appearances. 0 11 )
It was moved by Beirich, seconded by Field, and unani-
mously carried, that the hearing be continued to
April 1 , 1981 .
Council Minutes
3-18-81 Page 5
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
a) Neil Annenberg, 68830 Highway 111 , part owner of,
Palm Springs Oil Co. (service station at Indian
and Saturnino) spoke against the prohibition of
posting gasoline rate signs, stating that people (103)
want to know how much they have to pay for gaso-
line; that he will not forego his right to post
such signs, based on an unconstitutional ordinance;
and that he would take the matter to court if
necessary.
b) Kelly Dougherty, 205 S. Belardo Road, read a pre •
pared statement, a copy of which is on file in (103)
the Office of the City Clerk, urging that the
Council repeal the prohibition against posting
of gasoline rate signs.
c) Dick Smith, 1060 Olive Way, stated that he believes
the community has developed strong attitudes about
certain patterns in the community, one of which
is signs; that the Council should not be subject (103)
to the pressure of a small group to change that
kind of philosophy; and that if such a change
is desired, those interested in seeing that
happen should secure community support through
the initiative election process.
d) Rudy Ramirez, member of the Community Services
Commission, stated that the Commission was not (103)
favoring the posting of rate signs throughout
the community; that the State Law relates to a person 's
right to know how much gasoline rates are; and that
if the City goes to court on this issue, it may
lose the case and a precedent could be established
for other merchants to follow suit with rate signs.
c) Arthur McGinnis, 1170 Way, stated he could (103)
see no reason for not allowing the rate signs.
d) Nathan Israelson, 2349 Silver Oak, stated that he
did not believe allowing the gasoline rate signs
would encourage other merchants to do so; and that
he felt it would be possible to develop a uniform, (103)
tastefully done signs, as was the case in developing
real estate signs.
e) Larry Lapham, 500 S. Palm Canyon Drive, stated that
considerable thought and effort went into the
development of the density bonus and covenant
control mechanism concepts, and the consideration (88)
of now requiring dry sewers and drainage improve-
ments will heavily affect affordable housing projects;
that the drainage fee will result in a $1+ million
increase in permit fees for 359 units which are
proposed to be affordable housing; and that an
effort should not be made to accomplish this at
the expense of people who will be living and
working in the City.
074
Council Minutes
3-18-81 Page 6
LEGISLATIVE ACTION:
4. GASOLINE RATE SIGNS
City Attorney reported that at the time the Council
considered the posting of gasoline rate signs,, he
indicated that it could prohibit them on scenic
corridors ; and that after further review of the
State law, he has concluded that the prohibition
could not be enforced or supported and that provisions
of State law prevailed over the local sign ordinance.
City Manager stated that if the Council desired to
take action, it could reinstate the provisions previously
prescribed in the ordinance relating to gasoline service
stations, and adopt one of two ordinances, specifically
of which Ordinance "A" would allow service station
operators who wish to do so to post the signs or to
be exempt from the posting; or Ordinance"B" which
would not allow any exemption, but would require all
stations to post prices. He stated that if either
ordinance, or variations thereof, is adopted, the
posting of the sign would be subject to established
process for installation of signs; that the Planning
Commission would develop guidelines which would apply (103)
to gasoline rate signs, and the City's role would be
limited to assisting in acceptable design and aesthetics
of such signs, and not the prohibition of the rate
sign.
Mayor stated that the Council could enact either ordi-
nance, or take the matter under consideration;, com-
municating its intent to the public to repeal Ordi-
nance 1122, making the proposed ordinances available
for public comment at a hearing to be later held; and
tht he would favor the latter course of action.
Councilman Rose stated that he felt the brief from
Mr. Annenberg's attorney was helpful and done in the
highest manner of legal ethics; that: he would not
speak against anyone wishing to take more time to
consider which of the two courses of action should
be taken, but would question what more could be
added, since the Council has heard the pros and
cons before, and that the question is whether the
Council will maintain coming under the State law
or allowing stations to make the choice; that he
believed it was a simple distinction to make and one
which could be reached without further delay; that
he favors requiring stations to post the rates; and
that any decrease in prices would undoubtedly only
be temporary, since oil prices will continue to
increase.
Councilwoman Ortner stated that she believes the
Council should stand by its decision and not repeal
the prohibition; and that the City is known for its
atmosphere and attractiveness. She read several
clipping and magazine excerpts illustrating the
awareness of the absence of signs in the community,
and data contained in ACCRA 4th quarter report
indicating that gasoline prices are higher in Indio
than in Palm Springsih spite of signs posted; and
stated that recent CVB survey showed that people
were not attracted to shop because of rate signs,
that there has been a 13% decline in the number of
people who said they like sightseeing in the City,
and a 10% decline in the number of people who said
they like the atmosphere of the City; that the Council
Council Minutes
3-18-81 Page 7
4. GASOLINE RATE SIGNS (Continued)
must resist allowing the community to become unattractive
which can happen with a lot of signs; that she has
not been convinced that the Council has received
enough information by the City Attorney or from the
State Legislature or lobbyist who.;supported the legisla- CONT'D
tion, as to what was intended by its enactment; that (103)
she was not prepared to make a decision at this time,
and since she would be unable to attend the next
meeting, would like the matter continued for one
month; and that she felt it was unfortunate and
unfair that the two commissions did not get together
first before a recommendation was made.
Councilman Qeirich stated that he could agree with
Councilwoman Ortner's feelings; that he understood
that under the State law the prohibition could be
made and on that basis the decision was rendered;
that the City Attorney 's viewpoint is that the
contrary is true, which leaves little alternative
for the Council ; that he did not like having one
level of government imposing requirements on local
government; that less people are tending to come
to Palm Springs, and sometimes the importance of
tourism on the economy is forgotten; and that Ordi-
nance "A" allows discretion on the part of some
owners whether to post such signs, which may result
in less signs being posted.
In answer to question by Council , City Attorney stated
that choosing not to post signs at this time would
not preclude an operator from doing so later.
Councilman Field stated that he favored Ordinance "A"
and that he could not support something which is not
enforceable or could not withstand a legal test and
would result in staff time and tax dollars being
expended on a losing issue.
Mayor stated that he agreed with Councilwoman
Ortner's comments regarding the lack of signs
propagating the aesthetic image of the City,
however, he recognized that the issue faced is
a legal one and likes or dislikes must be set
aside, and the issue acted on based on legalities ;
and that he would favor Ordinance"A".
In answer to question by Council , City Manager
stated that the reason for the urgency ordinance
in January was to avoid economic hardship, which
is not the case at this time; and that there would
be no penalty imposed for posting of signs prior
to effective date of the ordinance, provided approval
of the sign has been given.
Councilwoman Ortner stated that if the ordinance is
adopted, it will only forestall the day coming when
the Sign Ordinance will be challenged, and that she
was hopeful that she was wrong in the conclusion
she has drawn.
Councilman Rose stated that he was not opposed to
posting of signs, but favored a mandatory requirement
to do so, rather than a permissive approach.
Council Minutes
3-18-81 Page 8
4. GASOLINE RATE SIGNS (Continued)
City Manager read title of Ordinance "A" (later to
receive sequential number) as follows :
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS,
CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE SIGN ORDINANCE;
ESTABLISHING EXEMPTION OF SCENIC CORRIDORS
FROM REQUIRMENT OF POSTING GASOLINE PRICE SIGNS. CONT 'D
(103)
It was moved by Beirich, seconded by Field, and
unanimously carried, that further reading be
waived.
It was moved by Beirich, seconded by Field, and
carried by the following vote that the Ordinance
be introduced for first reading:
AYES: Beirich, Field and Doyle
NOES: Ortner and Rose
ABSENT: None
5. MASTER PLAN OF FLOOD CONTROL & DRAINAGE - IMPLEM!EENTATION
AND COMPREHENSIVE FEE SCHEDULE AMENDMENT
Recommendation: Drainage Task Force recommends
requiring implementation of the above master plan city-
wide as a conditon of development; and immediate imposition
of acreage drainage fees in the amount of $6,115 per
net acre for the subdrainage area north of Vista Chino
for all new subdivisions or planned development districts
which do not have tentative approval prior to March
4, 1981 . (88 &
City Manager stated that cost for the area south of Vista 114)
Chino has not been determined; that: the fee will impact
cost of all types of housing; that •issue relates to who
should pay for the improvements; and given lack of ability
and inequity of charging existing taxpayers for the remedy
of problems created by development •in terms of drainage, and
the recommendation is the most appropriate approach to take.
Planning Director stated that implementation of the
plan is recommended because new development will add
to the problem areas of town and imposition of the
requirement needs Council support of the recomnmenda-
tions to begin those solutions; that storm water
retention is not the solution in all cases, does not
solve the ultimate problem, and is not wise in some
cases; that the acreage fee is levied against all
acres within the drainage area, and it is anticipated
that sufficient funds will be generated to implement
the critical sections which will remove the critical
stage of the problem and deal with new development;
that additional funding mechanisms are being con-
sidered to raise additional fees for other develop-
ments; that: the County is working on updating the entire
master plan concept, and based on preliminary review,
down-sizing of the system, resulting in less cost,
may be possible; and that there is one commercial ,
two industrial , and the AFCOM projects which will not
be subject to the fee.
In answer to question by Council , Planning Director
stated that the problem, whether moderate or high-
Priced development, relates to coverage of the land
which causes drainage problems that the street system
cannot handle; that run-off diversions and other
07
Council Minutes
3-18-81 Page 9
5. MASTER PLAN OF FLOOD CONTROL & DRAINAGE & FEE SCHEDULED
(Continued)
ways of treating the systems may result in eliminating
some sections; that an overall city-wide evaluation
should be made within the next 30 days , which may
result in the recommendation for one city-wide drainage
fee.
City Manager stated that if the concern is to provide
the lowest cost home, in regard to affordable housing,
then the logic is to make the cost of these improve-
ments as a direct subsidy from a tax source; and that
he was not in a position of recommending that the City
is in a financial position of justifying a $100,000
direct payment to offset this cost for the purpose
of keeping the price of a house down.
CONT'D
Councilman Field stated that an inexpensive house was (88 &
of little value if it would only later be washed out. 114)
Inanswer to question by Council , Planning Director
stated that consulting engineer indicated that the
February, 1980 storm was not in excess of a 10-year
storm, however, the volume of a 10-year storm is
about 60% of that of a 100-year storm; and that the
1980 storm was more over the southern portion of the
City than the Vista Chino area.
Councilwoman Ortner stated that in her opinion there
was not sucha thinganymore as low cost housing because
of the bureaucratic regulations imposed by federal ,
state and city levels of government; that she was not
in favor of the fee; and that she would favor some
other way of financing the improvements.
Councilman Rose stated that he could see no way of
allowing continued growth without a means of funding
the costs thereof; and that in all situations, growth
will have to make those improvements viable or be
limited until it is willing to pay for it.
City Manager noted that, as with other fees subject
to inflationary changes, this fee should be subject
to periodic review.
Resolution 13724, approving beginning the implementa-
tion of said plan, and Resolution 13725, amending the
fee schedule, as recommended, were presented; after
which, it was moved by Field, seconded by Beirich,
and carried by the following vote, that Resolutions
13724 and13725 be adopted:
AYES: Beirich, Field, Rose & Doyle
NO: Ortner
ABSENT: None
6. BOGERT TRAIL BRIDGE STUDY
Recommendation: That the Council approve letter
agreement with ASL Consulting Engineers, in amount
not to exceed $15,000 for certain work relating to
the Bogert Trail Bridge. (136)
Director of Community Development reported that the
study relates to hydraulic studies necessary to consider
shortening the length of the bridge.
Council Minutes
3-18-81 Page 10
6. BOGERT TRAIL BRIDGE (Continued)
Minute Order 2917, approving letter agreement„ and
Resolution 13726, amending the budget to appropriate
$15,000, were presented; after which, it was moved (136)
by Field, seconded by Rose, and unanimously carried,
that Minute Order 2917 and Resolution 13726 be adopted.
7. MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENT - PUBLIC NUISANCES (Introduced
3-4-81 )
City Manager read title of Ordinance 1135, as follows :
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS,
CALIFORNIA, AMENDING PORTION OF CHAPTER (103)
11 .72 OF THE PALM SPRINGS MUNICIPAL CODE
RELATING TO PUBLIC NUISANCES.
It was moved by Rose, seconded by Beirich, and unani-
mously carried, that further reading be waived, and
that Ordinance 1135 be adopted.
8. SALE OF CITY-OWNED LAND - SECTION 34
Recommendation: That the Council approve the sale
of a city-owned parcel of land on Las Vegas Road, to
Mr. Gietter, in amount of $5,000.
(117)
Resolution 13727, authorizing the sale, was presented;
after which, it was moved by Beirich, seconded by Field,
and unanimously carried, that Resolution 13727 be adopted.
9. SALE OF CITY-OWNED LAND - SECTION 19
Recommendation : That: the Council declare a parcel
of tax-deeded land acquired by the City, located on
the SE corner of Calle Santa Cruz and Ramon Road, and (117)
authorize its sale to Sungold Development, in amount
of $29,000.
Resolution 13728, declaring the parcel surplus and
authorizing its sale, was presented; after which, it
was moved by Rose, seconded by Beirich, and unani-
mously carried, that Resolution 13728 be adopted.
10. ALLOCATED POSITIONS & COMPENSATION PLAN - AMENDMENT
Recommendation: That the Council amend the above plan
to add Computer Programmer and adjust salary range
of Data Processing Officer, including appropriate amend- (61 )
ment to MX Compensation Plan.
Resolution 13729, amending said plans, was presented;
after which, it was moved by Field, seconded by Beirich,
and unanimously carried, that Resolution 13729 be adopted.
w r'
Council Minutes
3-18-81 Page 11
11 . RIVERSIDE COUNTY ARTS PLAN
Recommendation : That the Council approve the River-
side County Arts Plan.
In answer to question by Council , Director of Community
Services stated that approval will enable the County (123)
to planning and programming funding.
Resolution 13730, approving the plan, was presented;
after which, it was moved by Field, seconded by Rose,
and unanimously carried, that Resolution 13730 be
adopted.
CONSENT AGENDA:
12. Resolution 13731 amending Resolution 13625, relative to
authorization to purchase certain tax-deeded lands, to (117)
increase amount of Parcel B to $3,500.
13. Resolution 13732 approving amendment to Comprehensive Fee
Schedule to include "at current cost to the City" the uniform (114)
codes adopted by reference, not currently reflected in said
fee schedule.
14. Resolution 13733 updating designated officials authorized
to execute applications and documents for the purpose of (144)
obtaining financial assistance under the Federal Civil
Defense Act of 1950.
15. Resolution 13734 authorizing transfer of all funds in the
Transportation Fund to the General Fund, and elimination of (86)
the Transportation Fund as of June 30, 1981 .
16. Resolution 13735 approving amendments to the 1980-81 budget
to appropriate funds for sick leave and vacation payouts, as (61 )
authorized in Memoranda of Understanding with the various
employee units.
17. Resolution 13736 supporting passage of AB 591 , relative
to local adoption of the ICBO Plumbing Code. (98)
18. Minute Order 2918 awarding purchase of one new 1/2 ton
van truck to Palm Springs Motors, Inc. , in amount of $5,697. (84)
19. Minute Order 2919 approving agreement with Professional
Construction Administrators, Inc. , to perform inspection (85)
services in connection with construction of the child care
center at Cielo Vista School , in amount not to exceed .$I,000.
20. Minute Order 2920 awarding contract to IONIC Construction
Co. , Inc. , for drainage repairs at Paseo E1 Mirador and (136
Via Donna, Plaimor Avenue and Sybil Road, and Golf Club GEN)
Drive and Avenue 34, in amount of $15,998.
21 . Resolution 13737 proclaiming the week of March 30 -
April 4, 1981 , as "Firefighters ' Week," in honor of the (74)
50th anniversary of the Fire Department.
22. Resolution 13738 approving one-year time extension
for Tentative Tract Maps 14661 and 14662 for 40-acre (137)
parcel between Francis Drive and San Rafael , bisected
by Avenida Caballeros (124 units - Texas Western Dev. Co. )
23• ' Resolution 13739 approving Tentative Parcel Map 17192
to divide property on Cerritos Drive, between E1 Alameda (119)
and Tamarisk Road (Webb/Dora Prieto. )
I i
1 -
Council Minutes
3-18-81 Page 12
CONSENT AGENDA (Continued)
24. Resolution 13740 approving Tentative Parcel Map 117376 -
to combine property at the NW corner of Tamarisk Road (119)
and Avenida Palmas (Webb/Mercury Management - tennis
court) .
25. Resolution 13741 approving one-year time extension for
Tentative Tract Map 15463 for property on East Palm (137)
Canyon, between Escoba Drive and Avery Drive (Ervin/
Sheldon Appel - 42 units. )
26. Resolution 13742 approving second one-year time exten-
sion for Tentative Tract Map 13687 for property en Amado (137)
Road, between Calle El Segundo and Calle Alvarado (KWL
Assoc/Lebo Construction. )
27. Resolution 13743 approving Tentative Parcel Map 17371 (119)
for property on MacCarthy Road (Hallmark/DST Industries -
auto detailing firm - PD 109. )
28. Resolution 13744 and 13745 approving Payroll Warrants (86)
and Claims & Demands.
It was moved by Beirich, seconded by Field, and unani-
mously carried, that Resolutions 13731 through 13745 and
Minute Orders 2918 through 2920 be adopted.
29. FINAL MAPS - TRACTS 14661 , 14661 -1 and 10855
Resolution 13746 approving Final Subdivision Tract Map
14661 for property located on the SW corner of Avenida (137')
Caballeros and San Rafael Road - Haver/Texas Western
Development, 26 units;
Resolution 13747 approving final Subdivision Tract Map
14661-1 for property on the NW corner of Avenida Caballeros
and Francis Drive - Haver/Texas Western Development, 34
units;
Resolution 13748 approving Final Subdivision Tract Map
10855 for property on the west side of Avenida Caballeros
between Ramon Road and Baristo Channel - Goetten/M Tupaz
& Assoc, 140 units.
It was moved by Field, seconded by Beirich, and unanimously
carried, that Resolutions 13746 through 13748 be adopted.
30. SECTION 35 - AFCOM LEASE
Recommendation: That the Council approve 50-year lease
agreement with AFCOM Partners, Ltd. , for approximately
100 acres of land on the NW corner of Sunrise Way and (l w)
San Rafael , for the purpose of developing a mobile
home park and single family housing to benefit: low
and moderate income persons.
City Attorney explained basis for rental increases
and/or decreases. This matter was discussed in
detail at the last study session.
Resolution 13749, approving the lease agreement as
recommended, was presented; after which, it was moved
by Beirich, seconded by Rose, and unanimously carried
that Resolution 13749 be adopted.
A7�y �
Council Minutes
3-18-81 Page 13
31 . RENT COMMISSION FEE SCHEDULE
Recommendation: That the Council approve a graduated
fee schedule for filing hardship rent increase petition (60)
with the Rent Review Commission.
Resolution 13750, approving said fee schedule, was
presented; after which, it was moved by Rose, seconded
by Beirich, and unanimously carried, that Resolution
13750 be adopted.
REPORTS & REQUESTS :
32. DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS - Received & Ordered Filed
a) Separate Opinon on Compliance & Management Letter
33. CITY COUNCIL reports or requests
a) Councilwoman Ortner requested that the City Manager
look into the quality of the recent "fog-seal "
project at the Airport, stating her opinion that
it looks bad and is not smooth .
b) Mayor requested that W.T. Development Co. CUP 5.0152
for "The Bullring," a country western bar, proposed
in the former Cameron Center on South Palm Canyon (78)
Drive, between Mesquite & Random Road, be brought
to the Council for consideration.
c) It was moved by Beirich, seconded by Doyle, and
unanimously carried, that Rose and Doyle be (114)
appointed as sub-committee for Energy Commission
application process.
d) Mayor requested Assistant to City Manager to
readvertise for vacancies on the Community (60)
Services Commission.
34. PUBLIC reports or requests - None
35. STAFF reports or requests - None
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business at 10:10 p.m. , Mayor
declared the meeting adjourned.
NORMAN R. KING
City Clerk
j B JUDITH SUMICH
Deputy City Clerk
J ��^+