HomeMy WebLinkAbout8/2/2000 - STAFF REPORTS (2) MINUTES OF
CITY OF PALM SPRINGS
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
JUNE 7, 2000
A Regular Meeting of the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Palm Springs,
California, was called to order by Vice-Chairman Reller-Spurgin, in the Council Chamber,
3200 Tahquitz Canyon Way, on Wednesday, June 7, 2000 at 5:30 p.m., at which time, the
City Attorney announced items to be discussed in Closed Session, and at 7:00 p.m., the
meeting was convened in open session.
ROLL CALL: Present: Agency Members Jones, Hodges, Oden, and Reller-Spurgin
Absent: Chairman Kleindienst
REPORT OF POSTING OF AGENDA: City Clerk reported that the agenda was posted in
accordance with Council procedures on June 2, 2000.
REPORT OF CITY ATTORNEY ON MATTERS DISCUSSED IN CLOSED SESSION (All
Entities)- See items on Page 7 of agenda this date.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
It was moved by Oden, seconded by Jones and unanimously carried, that the
Minutes of February 16, April 5 & 19, 2000 be approved.
PUBLIC HEARING
A. 2000-01 CRA BUDGET
Recommendation: That the Agency consider the proposed fiscal year budget of
2000-01.
Executive Director reviewed the budget and in answer to questions by Agency
stated that funds were available in the parking fund to cover the demolition of the
Rudnick building; that there were unscheduled capital improvements that will be
moving forwarded that are also funded; that the section of Radio Road that
needs to be paved is in the budget; that the parking meter plan will be extended
for the area downtown; that the light standards for downtown are partially funded
in the budget; that the Agency does provide the base for the lights and that the
merchants purchase the rest.
Vice-Chairman declared the hearing open, there being no appearances, the
hearing was closed.
Agency Member Hodges stated that the Agency budget has not been fully
discussed; that the budget has always held a minor place in consideration of the
Council; that the Redevelopment budget is a powerful tool for economic
development for the City; that the commission Mr. Lapham has been requesting
to oversee the CRA is needed and should be considered by the Agency; that
within the budget is the funding for the dump site; that this needs to be
reevaluated; that clarification is needed regarding the project, since no
discussions have been held.
CRA Minutes
6-7-00, Page 2
Executive Director stated that a grant application has been applied for regarding
the dump site; that if the Agency's funds are combined with the State grants, a
major prime piece of property that is developable will be available within the City;
that if the property is reclaimable, it will be a major asset to the City and that staff
would like to gain the rewards of the area.
Agency Member Hodges stated that for 10 years this same story has been told;
that the Agency keeps putting money in the land, and nothing comes of it; that to
give additional money, in her opinion, is a waste; that if grants are available for
the project, then staff should pursue that avenue; but that it needs to be cleaned
up or just left a dump site forever.
Executive Director stated that the clean up will cost more than the $50,000 the
Agency has available, and will probably cost somewhere around $40 million.
Redevelopment Director stated that there are Federal grants and State grants
that staff will pursue; that the funding requested is to allow the pursuance of
those grants; that engineering studies are needed to include in the grant
application; that an engineer's proposal must likewise be included; and that the
information needed is beyond what staff can perform and specialists need to be
hired.
Motion to continue the matter to June 14, 2000 was presented; after which it was
moved by Hodges, seconded by Jones and unanimously approved, Kleindienst
absent, that the matter be continued to June 14, 2000.
PUBLIC COMMENTS: None
LEGISLATIVE ITEMS:
B. REDAC2
Recommendation: That the Agency approve an agreement with Jerry Ogburn
dba Redact for the continuation of the Village of Palm Springs Development
Center and the management of six redevelopment project areas located in the
downtown corridor, for fiscal year 2000-01 not to exceed $140,000. A----.
Motion to continue the matter for two weeks was presented; after which it was
moved by Oden, seconded by Hodges and unanimously approved, Kleindienst
absent, that the matter be continued to June 21, 2000.
C. PALOS VERDES VILLAS SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT
Recommendation: That the Agency approve a subordination agreement with the
California Housing Finance Agency in connection with a loan to Palos Verdes
Villas, a multi-family housing development. A-----.
Director of Redevelopment reviewed the staff report and added that assistance is
provided to the very low and low income; that the owners are refinancing the
project, hence the subordination agreement between the Agency and the parties;
that CC& R's are recorded against the property; that the CHAFA documents
were not received until this day; that the City Attorney has reviewed the
documents; that the regulations are in compliance; and that if the refinancing is
not obtained the Agency's CC&R's are not enforceable.
CRA Minutes
6-7-00, Page 3
Agency Member Oden stated that the Agency needs to maintain its housing
stock.
Agency Member Jones questioned if the present owner was the original owner.
Director of Redevelopment stated he is not.
Agency Member Jones questioned the amount of Agency funding.
Director of Redevelopment stated $6.2 million.
Agency Member Jones stated the project was never worth that amount; that the
project had 13 mechanical liens against the property that were never paid; that
the Agency is rewarding these acts with helping to reduce the interest to 4 %%;
that the Agency is saying it is ok to default on loans; that the Agency would only
lose 20 units; that it is picking up 68 units on the next pending action before the
Agency; that he was against this project 5 years ago; that no one took notice of
what he said then; and added that the project was doomed from the first day.
Agency Member Oden questioned what is the effect if the refinancing is not
approved.
Director of Redevelopment stated if financing is not obtained the property will go
to foreclosure; that staff's intent is to try to maintain the inventory; that the
Agency did assist the project in 1992; that the project was required to set aside
the housing requirement; that the project was cost effective and that while it is
true only 20 units will be lost; that 68 units, if approved, will be in a different
project area.
Agency Member Oden questioned if compliance was required in each project
area or if it could be combined.
Redevelopment Director stated that each must maintain its own counts.
Agency Member Jones clarified that if the action is approved it is rewarding
fraud.
Resolution as recommended was presented; after which, it was moved by Oden,
seconded by Hodges, and failed by the following vote:
AYES: Hodges and Oden
NO: Jones and Reller-Spurgin
ABSENT: Kleindienst.
Motion to continue the matter to June 14, 2000 was presented; after which, it was
moved by Oden, seconded by Hodges and carried by the following vote that the
matter be continued:
AYES: Hodges, Oden and Reller-Spurgin
NO: Jones
ABSENT: Kleindienst.
CRA Minutes
6-7-00, Page 4
D. HERITAGE APARTMENT OWNER PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT
Recommendation: That the Agency approve an owner participation agreement
with Rose Mihata and Scott Timberlake for the rehabilitation of a 136-unit mature
adult apartment complex at 300 South Calle El Segundo for up to $450,000.
A402C.
Director of Redevelopment reviewed the staff report.
Agency Member Oden questioned if the upgrades to the parking lot and pool
were included in the agreement.
Director of Redevelopment stated they are included; that there are two separate
lists; that in the master list priorities of health and safety are listed.
Agency Member Oden stated that this is a good effort on the part of the Agency
and the owner to join in a partnership; and added that it is a step in the right
direction.
Agency Member Jones stated that the agreement is a good one; that units are
added to the housing stock and that this deal is better than the last one.
Agency Member Reller-Spurgin stated that this is a senior complex; that Ms.
Mihata is making efforts to improve the housing for the seniors and does have a
general concern for the residents.
Resolution 1100 as recommended was presented; after which, it was moved by
Jones, seconded by Oden and unanimously approved, Kleindienst absent, that
R1100 be adopted.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, Vice-Chairman declared the meeting adjourned.
PATRICIA A. SANDERS
Assistant Secretary
MINUTES OF
CITY OF PALM SPRINGS
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
June 14, 2000
An Adjourned Regular Meeting of the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of
Palm Springs, California, was called to order by Chairman Kleindienst, in the Council
Chamber, 3200 Tahquitz Canyon Way, on Wednesday, June 14, 2000 at 5:30 p.m., at
which time, the City Attorney announced items to be discussed in Closed Session, and at
7:00 p.m., the meeting was convened in open session.
ROLL CALL: Present: Agency Members Jones, Hodges, Oden, Reller-Spurgin,
and Chairman Kleindienst
Absent: None
REPORT OF POSTING OF AGENDA: City Clerk reported that the agenda was posted in
accordance with Council procedures on June 9, 2000.
PUBLIC HEARING
A. 2000-01 CRA BUDGET
Recommendation: That the Agency consider the proposed fiscal year budget of
2000-01.
Redevelopment Director stated that at the last discussion there were a number of
concerns; that one of the issues was timeliness of the budget; that the budget is
ever changing; that the Agency does require revisions; and that there is a
narrative submitted with a description of each of the capital projects.
Agency Member Oden questioned if the proposed lights for the downtown will be
the same as the current lights.
Redevelopment Director stated that all the lighting standards are the same; that
the funding in the budget indicates the cost for the bases and foundations; that
merchants purchase the standards; that there are some places that will require
the Agency to place the lights, due to the Agency owning the land; and that there
is some funding designated for palm tree lighting.
Agency Member Hodges questioned if the Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla
Indians Who own property have been approached.
Redevelopment Director stated that the property owners will be contacted; and
that the standards are not placed on vacant land, nor are the foundations placed
until the property owner pays for the standard.
Director of Downtown Development stated that the program is two years old; that
participation has been good; and that the property owner does pay for the
standards before the Agency puts in the foundations.
Chairman Kleindienst questioned if the lighting was sufficient for safety.
CRA Minutes
6-14-00, Page 2
Redevelopment Director stated that the lighting did provide a feeling of security
for the residents and for tourists; that the program is well received; that there are
some areas that would like to be a part of the program but do not have the
conduit in place, i.e. Willows; that banners and the like can be placed on the
standards and that the City does control the banners as to content; that the next
capital item is the clean up of the dump site; that in order to clean the property,
engineering plans will need to be submitted which would identity the
contamination and a clean-up plan; that there are tenants that are interested in
the site, mostly for big box retailing.
Agency Member Jones questioned the last study performed on the site.
Redevelopment Director stated that the last study estimated a full clean-up for
$7-8 million; that now the estimate is well over $10 million; and that is only for a
partial clean-up; that the intent is to identity what has to be removed, get it out,
and leave the rest; that the target area is 12 acres; and that grant opportunities
are being looked at.
Agency Member Jones questioned if there was a legal closure of the dumpsite.
Redevelopment Director stated it was a clean closure; that it may be that the
edge could be lined, and the rest of the site be left intact; and in answer to
questions by Agency stated that the cost would partially be funded by the
Agency, grants requested from the State and Federal levels; that there will also
be a negotiated sales price; that the result could be a revenue stream of $700-
800,000 in sales tax per year; that the property did cost the Agency $3.5 million;
that interest has been expressed in purchasing the property; that the request
from Agency funds is $50,000 to fund the feasibility study; that if we can clean it
up, the benefit to the City will be everlasting.
Director of Finance & Treasurer stated that there will be an insurance settlement
regarding the fire at Palm Canyon Theatre; that electric and water damage
occurred; that the fountain was also affected; and that embers fell in the open
trenches and damaged the electric and water lines.
Director of Downtown Development reviewed plans for the tree wells along the
downtown corridor; and added that the some of the areas of the sidewalk are
pinched and that the walkways will be modified to widen the areas.
Mayor declared the hearing open.
Howard Lapham, Palm Springs, stated that the budget document is confusing;
that amendments are being made as the document is reviewed; that when all the
figures are added up, the sums do not equal the balance; that a committee is
needed to help guide the Redevelopment Agency; that some projects never
materialized; that an oversight committee would be able to review the projects
and make recommendations to the Agency; that the budget seems fragmented
and that the budget process should be changed back to the process where the
expenditures are reviewed in detail.
There being no further appearances, the hearing was closed.
CRA Minutes
6-14-00, Page 3
Agency Member Hodges stated that there was no more clarification during this
review than the last review; that she will approve the budget, but would like the
$50,000 for the dumpsite deleted.
Agency Member Reller-Spurgin questioned if the funding could be approved
contingent on approval of additional grants.
Assistant City Manager stated that the matter could be continued to the next
meeting for further information.
Resolution 1101 as recommended was presented; after which, it was moved by
Hodges, seconded by Oden and carried by the following vote that R1101 be
adopted:
AYES: Hodges, Oden, Reller-Spurgin and Kleindienst
NO: Jones.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
Dan Olivia, Best, Best and Kreiger, stated that as a representative of the owner
for item B he would like the Agency to consider approval and added that there
have been delinquencies in the complex; that CHAFA is working on getting the
complex fully rented; that the approval of the subordination agreement will allow
restructing of the loan and lower the payments; that if the Agency does not
approve the agreement, foreclosure will occur; that the apartments will be off the
tax roles, that the client will lose equity; that the City will lose low/moderate
housing credit and tax increment; that approval of the agreement does not place
the Agency in any worse condition and recommended approval.
LEGISLATIVE ITEMS:
B. PALOS VERDES VILLAS SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT
Recommendation: That the Agency approve a subordination agreement with the
California Housing Finance Agency in connection with a loan to Palos Verdes
Villas, a multi-family housing development. A402C.
Director of Redevelopment reviewed the staff report and recommended approval.
Agency Member Oden questioned if the action was not approved, what effect on
housing stock would occur.
City Attorney stated that if the units are no longer restricted, it cannot be counted;
that when the units are restricted, they become subject to the housing program
and would potentially count.
Agency Member Jones stated it is not clear why so much assistance was given
to this project; that it is 25-30% vacant; that the density has risen but this group
still cannot make its payments; that the pro ratio share per unit was too high and
that the matter should not be approved.
CRA Minutes
6-14-00, Page 4
City Attorney stated that the subsidies must be justified for the number of units
involved; that the discussion with the Council at time of approval was to help the
housing program; that the general area was in economic difficulty; that the new
program was to help the entire area; that it was new construction; that the project
moved ahead with about 20 units being restricted; that the reality is, if the
property is foreclosed, the restrictions will go away; and that the City will end up
without the stock in its acquisitions; that in the end the Federal government has
first interest; that the only way the program works is to let HUD or the State be
first interest and the City second; and that approval of the matter allows the City
to stay in the same position it is currently in.
Agency Member Hodges stated that the previous Council approved a project at a
time when there was no construction activity in Palm Springs; that it was a
beautiful project and was to be a spur to the area and was a good project for a
devastated area.
Resolution 1102 as recommended was presented; after which, it was moved by
Oden, seconded by Hodges, and carried by the following vote that R1102 be
adopted.
AYES: Hodges, Oden, Reller-Spurgin and Kleindienst
NO: Jones.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, Chairman declared the meeting adjourned.
PATRICIA A. SANDERS
Assistant Secretary
MINUTES OF
CITY OF PALM SPRINGS
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
June 21, 2000
A Regular Meeting of the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Palm Springs,
California, was called to order by Chairman Kleindienst, in the Council Chamber, 3200
Tahquitz Canyon Way, on Wednesday, June 21, 2000 at 5:30 p.m., at which time, the City
Attorney announced items to be discussed in Closed Session, and at 7:00 p.m., the
meeting was convened in open session.
ROLL CALL: Present: Agency Members Jones, Hodges, Oden, Reller-Spurgin,
and Chairman Kleindienst
Absent: None
REPORT OF POSTING OF AGENDA: City Clerk reported that the agenda was posted in
accordance with Council procedures on June 16, 2000.
REPORT OF CITY ATTORNEY ON MATTERS DISCUSSED IN CLOSED SESSION (All
Entities) - See items on Page 7 of agenda this date.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
It was moved by Oden, seconded by Hodges and unanimously carried, that the
Minutes of May 17 & 31, 2000 be approved.
PUBLIC HEARING: None
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
Jim Stuart expressed support for a CRA oversight committee; and added that
there is a lot of good talent in the Community to work with and a lot of issues and
ideas to be discussed.
LEGISLATIVE ITEMS:
A. Not Used
B. REDAC2
On June 7, 2000 Agency continued consideration of approval of an agreement
with Jerry Ogburn dba Redact for the continuation of the Village of Palm Springs
Development Center and the management of six redevelopment project areas
located in the downtown corridor, for fiscal year 2000-01 not to exceed $140,000.
A4234.
Director of Redevelopment reviewed the staff report, no further report was given.
Resolution 1103 as recommended was presented; after which, it was moved by
Oden, seconded by Hodges, and unanimously carried that R1103 be adopted.
CRA Minutes
6-21-00, Page 2
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, Chairman declared the meeting adjourned.
PATRICIA A. SANDERS
Assistant Secretary