Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout10/20/1999 - STAFF REPORTS (20) DATE: October 6, 1999 TO: City Council FROM: Grants and Government Affairs Manager via Assistant City Manager-Operations APPROVE COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT FORMING INDIAN AVENUE RULE 20A UTILITY UNDERGROUNDING DISTRICT RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a Resolution approving a Cooperative Agreement regarding the formation of a utility undergrounding district,under Rule 20A,to be administered by the County of Riverside and constructed by Southern California Edison Co., (SCE) to underground existing overhead poles and lines along Indian Avenue and Garnet Avenue at Interstate 10 interchange,City Project No.99-18. BACKGROUND: The City of Palm Springs has been approached by land developers and the County of Riverside to form anew utility undergrounding district at the intersection of Indian Avenue and Garnet Avenue at the Interstate 10 interchange,using Rule 20A funding under a program administered by Southern California Edison Co. (SCE)and under California Public Utilities Commission(PUC)guidelines. The Rule 20A funds are intended to be used primarily to underground existing overhead utility poles and lines for aesthetic purposes. The funds can also be used in special cases, however, to underground lines that represent a threat to health and safety. The undergrounding must take place on highly visible public locations,lilre major road thoroughfares or busy activity centers that would benefit from the visual cleanup by removal of poles and overhead wires. A current 1993/94 Rule 20A undergrounding project by the City and SCE was recently completed along E.Palm Canyon Drive and El Cielo Road at a cost of$3.3 million,which was mortgaged out for nine years. We have received a written request and draft Cooperative Agreement from the County of Riverside to form the proposed Utility Underground District at Indian/Gamet/1-10 interchange vicinity. The estimated undergrounding cost of$2,195,000 would be funded by County of Riverside Rule 20A Utility Undergrounding costs with developer participation by commercial property owners fronting the facilities. Attached for Council's consideration is a Resolution approving a Cooperative Agreement with the County ofRiverside,which calls for the formation ofthe proposed Rule 20A Utility Undergrounding District. Also attached are SCE boundary maps. SCE plans to proceed with the bidding process after the Public Hearing process is complete,and construction is expected to be completed by in about one year. Please note that all costs are being paid for by County of Riverside Rule 20A SCE allocation fiords and developer fimds and no local City general funds are required. APPROVED: �ROBERT L.MOHLER a MSM Grants and Gova ent Affairs Ma agor Assistant City Manager-Operations APPRO�VrE�D�: " _ V rtY Manager ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution approving Cooperative Agreement with Riverside County Forming Undergrounding District 2. Riverside County Cooperative Agreement 3. SCE Location Maps 4. Cost Estimate($2,195,000) OF Pop, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE TRANSPORTATION AND LAND MANAGEMENT AGENCY LAND M� Transportation Department David F. Barnhart Director of Transportanon August 31, 1999 Mr. Robert L. Mohler Transportation/A.D. and Grants Manager City of Palm Springs 3200 E. Tahquitz Canyon Way P.O. Box 2743 Palm Springs, Ca. 92263-2743 Re: Draft Cooperative Agreement Proposed Indian Avenue/Garnet Avenue Rule 20-A project Dear Mr. Mohler; Transmitted for review by the City of Palm Springs is the draft of the proposed cooperative agreement between the County of Riverside and the City of Palm Springs for the undergrounding of utilities in the Garnet area. The agreement has been prepared by the County's Transportation Department in accordance with our recent field meeting and correspondence, and has been reviewed by our legal counsel. Review by technical and legal staff of the City of Palm Springs is now appropriate. Thank you for your attention to this matter. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at your convenience at (909) 955-6785. Sincerely, � a. D Stan Dery, Principal Engi ring Technician Contracts and UNINess Un/t sd attachment cc:George Johnson Scott Staley Ray Mendez,SCE Ps LESX-"t%s r VoutyWn1 4080 Lemon Street,8th Floor•Riverside,California 92501 •(909)955-6740 P.O. Box 1090• Riverside,California 92502-1090•PAX(909)955-6721 I Co®ty Conumno. 2 COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT 3 Indian Avenue and Garnet Avenue Underground Utility District 4 5 This agreement(hereinafter referred to as "AGRUEMENT")is made and entered into this 6 day of . 1999,by and between the County of Riverside,a political 7 subdivision of the State of California(hereinafter referred to as "COUNTY"), and the City of 8 Palm Springs,a municipality(hereinafter referred to as "CITY"). 9 10 RECITALS: 11 12 WHEREAS,COUNTY and CITY desire to participate in an Underground Utility Project in the 13 vicinity of Indian Avenue and Garnet Avenue in the Palm Springs area(hereinafter referred to as 14 "PROJECT"),to replace overhead utility facilities under 34 kilovolts with underground facilities; 15 and 16 17 WHEREAS,COUNTY and CrrY have determined the boundaries of the proposed 18 Underground Utility District(hereinafter referred to as "DISTRICT")in cooperation with the 19 Southern California Edison Company(hereinafter referred to as "EDISON")and the proposed 20 District boundaries are partially within the CITY and partially within the COUNTY, and 21 22 WHEREAS,COUNTY desires to utilize County Rule 20-A Underground Utility Conversion 23 funds for the majority of the costs of the PROJECT,and 24 25 WHEREAS,CITY desires to place utilities underground within the project area,but does not 26 have Rule 20-A funds available; and 27 28 COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT Page t of 6 1 WHEREAS, CITY has entered into agreements with certain property owners for funding 2 participation in a underground utility district; and 3 4 WHEREAS,the established procedure for the utilization of California Public Utilities 5 Commission(hereinafter referred to as "CPUC")Rule 20-A funds is for the serving electric 6 utility company(EDISON), as the owner of the electric facilities,to review and approve the 7 eligibility of candidate projects, to design the conversion improvements, and to advertise, award, 8 and administer the construction of the conversion improvements; and 9 10 WHEREAS,EDISON has determined that the PROJECT is a qualifying project under the 11 CPUC guidelines; 12 13 NOW,THEREFORE,the parties hereby agree as follows: 14 15 1 Recitals. The above recitals are true and correct. 16 2' Lead Agmgy. COUNTY shall be the lead agency for the PROJECT. 17 3. Project Boundaries. The project boundaries shall be in conformance with the project 18 boundary map, designated Attachment"A",which is attached and made a part hereof, 19 subject to such minor modifications as may be required for practical considerations in the 20 implementation of the PROJECT. Attachment "A" also indicates that portion of the 21 PROJECT that is within the COUNTY and that portion that is within the CITY. 22 4. Project Desgdojon. The PROJECT is to replace all overhead utility facilities with 23 underground facilities, except for surface mounted utility facilities that do not support 24 overhead cables,those utility facilities that exceed 34 kilovolts, and those overhead 25 facilities that are near the EDISON owned substation adjacent to the PROJECT boundaries 26 and determined by EDISON to be critical in the operation of the substation. 27 28 COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT Page 2 of 6 1 5. Project Costs. The PROJECT cost is estimated at$2,175,000,excluding agency 2 administration costs, as described in Attachment"B",which is attached and made a part 3 hereof. 4 6. City/Prop=Owner Agreements CITY shall fund,or cause to be funded,the 5 underground utility costs along the frontage of the properties located on the southwest and 6 northeast comers of the intersection of Indian Avenue and Garnet Avenue, consistent with 7 the agreements between the CITY and each respective property owner. CITY shall deposit 8 with EDISON,or cause to be deposited with EDISON,the estimated proportionate project 9 cost attributable to the two parcels,which has been calculated by EDISON and is shown 10 on attachment"B". 11 7. Use of County Rule 20-A Funds COUNTY shall authorize EDISON to utilize COUNTY 12 Rule 20-A funds for the PROJECT,including that portion of PROJECT which is within the 13 CITY. The Rule 20-A costs are estimated at$2,175,000,less the proportionate private 14 property owner contribution as described in Section 6,above. 15 8. Administrative Costs. Administrative costs incurred by COUNTY and CITY will be the 16 funding responsibility of each respective party, and neither entity shall bill the other for 17 such costs. 18 9. County District Establishment COUNTY shall establish an Underground Utility District 19 for that portion of the PROJECT that is within its jurisdictional boundaries by action of its 20 Board of Supervisors,in accordance with established procedures, and order the relocation 21 of overhead facilities within the PROJECT area that are 34 kilovolts or less for that portion 22 of the PROJECT that is within its jurisdictional boundaries. 23 10. City District Establishment. CITY shall establish an Underground Utility District for that 24 portion of the PROJECT that is within its jurisdictional boundaries by action of its City 25 Council, in accordance with the established procedures, and order the relocation of 26 overhead facilities within the PROJECT area that are 34 kilovolts or less for that portion of 27 the PROJECT that is within its jurisdictional boundaries. 28 COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT Page 3 of 6 1 11. Cooperation, Both CITY-and COUNTY will cooperate and coordinate with each other and 2 EDISON for the implementation and completion of the PROJECT. Both CITY and 3 COUNTY will perform such actions,as necessary and appropriate for the implementation 4 and completion of the PROJECT, including property owner coordination and the resolution 5 of problems pertaining to property owner compliance with Underground Utility District 6 requirements within each entity's respective jurisdiction. 7 12. Encroachment Permits. CITY shall issue encroachment permits to EDISON and COUNTY 8 as needed for constriction of PROJECT at no cost to EDISON or COUNTY. COUNTY 9 shall issue encroachment permits to EDISON and CITY as needed for construction of 10 PROJECT at no cost to EDISON or COUNTY. 11 13. Reciprocal Indemnification. Each party hereto shall indemnify, defend,save and hold 12 harmless the other party and their respective officers, agents, and employees,of and from 13 any and all liability,claims, demands, debts, losses or suits or damages to other parties for 14 death, personal injury or property damage, arising out of or in any manner connected with 15 the performance of the duties and obligations of such indemnifying party under this 16 AGREEMENT. 17 14. Successors and assigns. This AGREEMENT shall inure to the benefit of and be binding on 18 each of the parties and their respective successors and assigns. 19 15. Severability. The invalidity of any provision in this AGREEMENT as determined by a 20 court of competent jurisdiction shall in no way affect the validity of another provision 21 hereof. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 _ COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT Page 4 of 6 1 16. Notices. Any notice authorized or required to be given by this AGREEMENT or 2 proceedings related hereto shall be deemed to have been sufficiently given if and when sent 3 by fast class mail,postage prepaid,to the parties as follows: 4 To County: To City: 5 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS 6 Transportation Department 3200 E. Tahquitz Canyon Way 7 4080 Lemon Street, 8w floor P.O. Box 2743 8 P.O.Box 1090 Palm Springs, Ca. 92263-2743 9 Riverside, Ca. 92502-1090 Attn: Robert L.Mahler 10 Attn: Stan Dery 11 12 17. This AGREEMENT contains the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the 13 matters horn provided for and may be amended by a subsequent written agreement 14 executed by all parties. This AGREEMENT may be executed in counterparts each of 15 which shall be deemed au original,but which together shall constitute a single agreement. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT Page 5 of 6 j & *v4 7 1 2 IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties hereto have executed this AGREEMENT as of the date 3 indicated above. 4 5 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS 6 B By 7 Chairman, Board of Supervisors 8 9 Dated Dated 10 ATTEST: ATTEST: 11 GERALD A.MALONEY Clerk of the Board 12 By 13 Deputy Clerk of the Board By City Clerk 14 APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO FORM: 15 William C.Katzenstein 16 County Counsel 17 B Deputy County Counsel By 18 19 20 21 sd 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT Page 6 of 6 TRANSMITTAL OQ PALM 8 DATE: ��Ze) . 1999 e- u` N FROM: Robert L.Mohler Grants&Government Affairs Manager «N••"� CITY OF PALM SPRINGS c�tiFpgN�P Department:Assmtam City Manager-Operations 3200 E.Tahquitz Canyon Way (P.O.Box 2743) Palm Springs,CA.92263-2743 Phone: (760) 323-8250/Fax 322-8360 TO: ATTENTION: G SUBJECT 74 17 C�il'S��jsis dv PLEASE HANDLE POR YOURINFORMATION,_PLEASE RETURN PER YOUR REQUEST _ PLEASE REVIEW AND RETURN WITH COh04ENTS BY.- THIS WILL BE THE ONLY COPY YOU WILL RECEIVE AN ORIGINAL or_HARD COPY WILL BE FORWARDED BY MAIL TODAY 1VlailinQ Address Street Address P.O.Box 2743 3200 E.Tahgaitz Canyon Way Palm Springs,CA 92263 Palm Springs,CA 92262 PAGE 1 OF -3 PAGES i Cooperative Agreement Rule 20-A Underground Utility District Project ATTACHMENT"B" Estimate of Project Costs Rule 20-A Underground Utility District Project Indian Avenue and Garnet Avenue Palm Springs I Garnet area Design, Construction and Inspection $2,157,500 Source of Funds: CPUC Rule 20-A 1,995,000 City/Developer agreement(NW) 100,000 City/Developer agreement(SE) 62,500 Total: 2,157,500 CITY Administrative costs $ 10,000 Source of Funds:City funds COUNTY Administrative costs $ 10,000 Source of Funds:County funds Total Estimated Project costs: $2,177,500 sd .6-3 r Cooperative Agreement Rule 20-A Underground Utility District Project ATTACHMENT "B" Estimate of Project Costs Rule 20-A Underground Utility District Project Indian Avenue and Garnet Avenue Palm Springs/Garnet area Design, Construction and Inspection $2,175,000 Source of Funds: CPUC Ride 20-A 1,995,000 (Sty/Developer agreement(NW) 110,000 City/Developer agreement(M 70.000 Total: 2,175,000 CITY Administrative costs $ 10,000 Source of Funds:City fmuls COUNTY Administrative costs $ 10,000 Source of Funds:County fmrds Total Estimated Project costs: $2,195,000 sd r 1� RESOLUTION NO. 19672 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE TO FORM A RULE 20A UTILITY UNDERGROUNDING DISTRICT AT THE INTERSECTION OF INDIAN AVENUE/GARNET AVENUE AND INTERSTATE 10 IN COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE AND CITY OF PALM SPRINGS AND TO ESTABLISH RULE 20A BOUNDARY MAP BOUNDARIES. ALL COSTS TO BEFROM COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE RULE 20A UTILITY UNDERGROUNDING FUNDS AND FROM DEVELOPER CONTRIBUTIONS,ALSO MINOR ADMINISTRATIVE CITY COSTS ALLOCATED FOR THE INDIAN AV ENUE/GARNET AV ENUE RULE 20A UTILITY UNDERGROUNDING DISTRICT. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Palm Springs does hereby: 1. Approve Cooperative Agreement with the County of Riverside to form a Rule 20A Utility Undergrounding District at the intersection of Indian Avenue/Gamet Avenue and Interstate 10 in County of Riverside and City of Palm Springs;and 2. Establish City District within County of Riverside Rule 20 A Underground District boundary map (indicated on Attachment"A");and 3. That all costs to be from County ofRiverside Rule 20A Utility Undergrounding Funds and also from developer contributions and minor administrative City costs as indicated on Estimate of Project Costs,(Attachment'B"). ADOPTED this 20th day of October 1999. AYES: Members Barnes, Hodges, Reller-Spurgin and Mayor Kleindienst NOES: None ABSENT. Member Oden ATTEST: CITY OF PALM SPRINGS,CALIFORNIA By. City Clerk City1Ma—eager REVIEWED&APPROVED AS TO FORM ATTACHMENTS: 1. Cooperative Agreement 2. Boundary Map(Attachment"A") 3. Estimate of Project Costs(Attachment"B")