Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC Resolution _6363- Case 5.1306 ZTARESOLUTION NO. 6363 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A PROPOSED ZONE TEXT AMENDMENT OF THE PALM SPRINGS MUNICIPAL CODE TO ALLOW CHURCH USES IN THE P AND C1AA ZONES AND CHANGE CHURCH USES FROM CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED TO BY -RIGHT IN THE CSC, C-1, C-2, HC, CM, M1 P, M1 AND M2 ZONES; AND TO ALLOW THE INITIATION OF CODE AMENDMENTS BY THE PLANNING DIRECTOR (CASE 5.1306 ZTA). WHEREAS, the proposed amendment is considered a "project" pursuant to the terms of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), and the it has been recommended that the proposed amendment be determined to be Categorically Exempt from the provisions of CEQA under Section 15305 (Minor Alterations in Land Use Limitations) of the Guidelines for the California Environmental Quality Act because the proposed zone text amendment proposes only insignificant changes to the title and provides for increased locations for churches and allowing staff to initiate amendments. WHEREAS, a notice of public hearing of the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Springs, California for Case 5.1306 ZTA (Zone Text Amendment) was given in accordance with applicable law; and WHEREAS, on October 23, 2013 a public hearing of the Planning Commission was held to review said case, and at said hearing the Planning Commission reviewed and considered all of the evidence presented in connection with the hearing on the project, including, but not limited to, the staff report, and all written and oral testimony presented. THE PLANNING COMMISSION HEREBY FINDS AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Pursuant to CEQA, the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council determine that the proposed zone text amendment (Case 5.1306 ZTA) is Categorically Exempt from the provisions of CEQA under Section 15305 (Minor Alterations in Land Use Limitations) of the Guidelines for the California Environmental Quality Act because the proposed zone text amendment proposes only insignificant changes to the title and provides for increased locations for churches and allowing staff to Initiate amendments. SECTION 2: Pursuant to PSZC Section 94.07.01 (Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment), the Planning Commission finds as follows: A. The proposed zoning code amendment is consistent with the intent of the zoning code, because, according to Section 91.00.00, the Zoning Code is adopted "For the purpose of promoting and protecting the public health, safety and welfare of the people of the city of Palm Springs and to provide for the social, physical and economic advantages resulting from comprehensive and orderly planned use of Planning Commission Resolution No. 6363 Case 5.1306 ZTA October 23, 2013 Page 2of2 land resources ..."; and the amendment proposes to modify the existing zoning land use categories to allow for additional uses and additional methods to initiate amendments. B. The proposed zoning code amendment is consistent with the intent of the general plan, because, the General Plan priorities include: Encourage the creative mixing of land use to promote vibrant neighborhoods and reduce the need for vehicle use; and a Vision that states: We provide responsive, friendly, efficient public services within a government that fosters unity among all our citizens. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that, based upon the foregoing, the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council determine that the proposed zone text amendment Case 5.1306 ZTA is Categorically Exempt from the provisions of CEQA under Section 15305 (Minor Alterations in Land Use Limitations) of the Guidelines for the California Environmental Quality Act and also recommends adoption of an ordinance to approve a zone text amendment (Case 5.1306 ZTA), as set forth in Exhibit A. ADOPTED this 23rd day of October, 2013. AYES: Commissioner Calerdine, Commissioner Klatchko, Commissioner Lowe, Commissioner Roberts, Commissioner Weremiuk, Vice -Chair Hudson and Chair Donenfeld NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. ATTEST: CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA W1__ A M. Valrgo Wheeler, AICP Director of Planning Services N Exhibit A Planning Commission Resolution No. 6363 Case 5.1306 ZTA - Church Uses October 23, 2013 Definitions: Section 1: Section 91.00.10.E of the Palm Springs Zoning Code is amended as follows: Delete - "Church" Add - "Religious institution - Facilities operated by religious organizations for worship, or the promotion of religious activities, including churches, mosques, synagogues, temples, etc., and religious schools; and ancillary uses on the same site, such as living quarters for ministers and staff, and child day care facilities accessory to the religious facility itself. Other establishments maintained by religious organizations, including full- time educational institutions, hospitals, and other potentially related operations (for example, a recreational camp) are classified according to their respective activities." Section 2: P Zone: Section 92.08.00.01.0 of the Palm Springs Zoning Code is amended to add: 2. Religious Institutions Section 3: CDN Zone: Section 92.10.01.C. of the Palm Springs Zoning Code is amended to add: 9. Religious Institutions Section 4: CSC Zone: Section 92.11.01.A of the Palm Springs Zoning Code is amended to add: 7. Religious Institutions Section 5: C-1 Zone: Section 92.12.01.A of the Palm Springs Zoning Code is amended to add: 96. Religious Institutions Section 6: C1A A Zone: Section 92.13.01.C.1. of the Palm Springs Zoning Code is amended to add: I. Religious Institutions Section 7: C2 Zone: Section 92.14.01.A. of the Palm Springs Zoning Code is amended to add: 21. Religious Institutions Section 8: CM Zone: Section 92.15.01.A. of the Palm Springs Zoning Code is amended to add: 33. Religious Institutions Section 9: M-1-P Zone: Section 92.16.01.A. of the Palm Springs Zoning Code is amended to add: 8. Religious Institutions 0 Section 10: Section 94.07.01.13.1. of the Palm Springs Zoning Code is amended to add: c. The director of Planning Services may initiate proceedings by submitting the matter to the Planning Commission for public hearings. w FJ