HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC Resolution _6343- Case 5.1082 AMND FRESOLUTION NO.6343
OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM
SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA APPROVING CASE 5.1082 AMND-F;
A MINOR AMENDMENT TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
DISTRICT 321 ESTABLISHING UNIFORM SETBACKS AND
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND ESTABLISHING
GUIDELINES FOR PROCESSING INSIGNIFICANT CHANGES
ON ALL LOTS FOR PDD 321 "THE MORRISON"; A GATED
COMMUNITY OF 53 SINGLE FAMILY HOMES ON
INDIVIDUAL LOTS ON AN APPROXIMATELY 8.5 ACRE
PARCEL AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF AVENIDA
CABALLEROS AND ALEJO ROAD, ZONE PDD 321, SECTION
14 (1 Q.
WHEREAS, The City of Palm Springs, ("Applicant") has filed an application with the
City pursuant to Section 94.03.00(G) (Modification of Final Development Plan for a
PDD) of the Zoning Code requesting approval for a minor amendment to a previously
Planned Development District proposing standardized setbacks and development
standards for PDD 321 and establishing guidelines for processing insignificant changes
within the PDD consistent with other residential PDD's; and
WHEREAS, on April 21, 2010 the City Council adopted Ordinance 1771; an
amendment to Planned Development District 321 and Tentative Tract 34165 in lieu of a
Change of Zone. This amendment established the project scope with 53 single family
attached and detached homes and modified the tract map to create individual lots for
each of the homes as well as private streets and common landscaped areas, and
WHEREAS, with the approval of PDD 321, a matrix with unique setbacks and
development standards for each lot was adopted, and
WHEREAS on June 24, 2013 the Architectural Advisory Committee reviewed Case
5.1082 PDD 321 AMND-F and voted unanimously to recommend its approval by the
Planning Commission, and
WHEREAS, on July 24, 2013, a meeting was held by the Planning Commission
regarding Case 5.1082 PDD 321 AMND-F in accordance with applicable law; and
WHEREAS, at said meeting the Planning Commission discussed the practical
application of Section 94.03.00 G, including the effect of small additions to individual
homes within Planned Development District 321, and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has determined that the integrity of the Planned
Development District must be preserved through careful and deliberate oversight of
changes, including minor site and architectural changes, and
WHEREAS, the Commission also believes that certain modifications to individual
residential units within Planned Development District 321 may be of such an
insignificant nature that they do not rise to the level of "minor architectural or site
Planning Commission Resolution No. 6343 August 14, 2013
Case 5.1082 PDD 321 ANND-F Standardized Setbacks and Development Standards Page 2 of 4
changes", including certain patio covers, awnings, trellises, and additions of limited
amounts of square footage, and
WHEREAS, with the establishment of standard setbacks and development standards
for PDD 321, the Planning Commission is able to apply the same guidelines for
processing insignificant changes to the PDD for this development that it established for
other residential PDD's with adoption of Resolution 6072, and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines,
the application has been determined to be a project subject to environmental analysis
under CEQA; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has carefully reviewed and considered all of the
evidence presented in connection with the hearing on the project, including, but not
limited to, the staff report, and all written and oral testimony presented.
THE PLANNING COMMISSION HEREBY FINDS AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines,
the application is deemed Categorically Exempt from further analysis
under CEQA, pursuant to Section 15305 "Minor Alterations in Land Use
Limitations.
Section 2: Pursuant to Section 94.02.00 G, a minor amendment to a PDD may be
approved by the Planning Commission if it "does not modify the intent of
the PD". The intent of the PDD was to establish a neighborhood of
attached and detached single family homes on small, individual lots within
a gated community. The PDD essentially established a single family
"zone" with lot sizes averaging 5,566 square feet.
Section 3: That allowing insignificant changes to individual residential units within an
approved Final Development Plan of a Planned Development District
allow homeowners to add value to, and more fully appreciate and enjoy
their home without compromising the overall identity of the PDD.
Section 4: Insignificant changes shall be limited to small exterior changes and
additions which do not affect the overall density, intensity, identity or
general appearance of the PDD.
Section 5: That insignificant additions do not rise to the status of a "minor site or
architectural changes" to the entire PDD and therefore need not be
subject to the provisions of PSZC Section 94.03.00 G.
Section 6: That insignificant additions may be applied for, and approved by the
Department of Planning Services, through an appropriate over-the-
counter process in order to expedite the permitting process and provide
Planning Commission Resolution No. 6343 August 14, 2013
Case 5.1082 PDD 321 ANND-F Standardized Setbacks and Development Standards Page 3 of 4
documentation of the change.
Section 7: Development Standards and Setbacks for all lots in Planned Development
District 321 are hereby modified to be as follows:
• Front Yards: 6 feet where homes are placed close to the street.
• Front Yards: 10 feet where homes are setback closer to the rear
property line.
• Interior Side Yards: 0 for attached homes, 4 feet for all others.
• Front Side Yards: 7 feet.
• Rear yards -- Front loaded pool lots: 4 feet.
• Rear yards — All others —10 feet.
• Maximum height of additions or accessory structures — 12 feet.
• No roof decks on accessory structures.
• Maximum lot coverage: 50%.
Any other development standards not noted herein shall follow the
development standards for the R-1-D zone,
Section 8: All previous setbacks for PDD 321 shown in Exhibit "A: PDD 321; TTM
34165 AMND - LOT AREAS, SETBACKS AND COVERAGE" are hereby made
null and void and henceforth, the setbacks shown above shall apply to all
lots in PDD 321.
Planning Commission Resolution No. 6343 August 14, 2013
Case 5.1082 PDD 321 ANND-F Standardized Setbacks and Development Standards Page 4 of 4
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that, based upon the foregoing, the Planning
Commission hereby approves Case 5.1082 PDD 321 AMND-F, and hereby directs staff
to accept, process and review insignificant changes to residential dwelling units in PDD
321 according to the standard setbacks and development standards listed in Section 7
for all lots in PDD 321 as follows:
Insignificant changes to the PDD shall be limited to the following additions on
attached and detached single family dwellings:
a. Patio covers, trellises, and other unenclosed coverings.
b. Window awnings conforming to the color scheme of the applicable PDD.
c. Additions of enclosed square footage that do not cause the maximum lot
coverage noted in Section 7 to be exceeded.
2. Insignificant changes may be reviewed and approved through the Minor
Architectural Approval process or other procedure as determined by the Director
of Planning Services.
3. Decisions on insignificant changes may be appealed to the Planning
Commission in accordance with established appeal procedures.
ADOPTED this 14th day of August, 2013.
AYES: 5, Commissioner Calerdine, Chair Donenfeld, Vice -Chair Hudson,
Commissioner Klatchko and Commissioner Lowe
NOES: None
ABSENT: 2, Commissioner Roberts and Commissioner Weremiuk
ABSTAIN: None
CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA
Director of Planning Services
391
K