Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC Resolution _6093- Case 5.1147- SNCRESOLUTION NO.6093 OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA FOR A RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION TO CHANGE THE NAME OF NORTH INDIAN AVENUE TO NORTH INDIAN CANYON DRIVE. WHEREAS, Century Vintage Homes (Applicant") has filed an application (Case No. 5.1147 — SNC) with the City pursuant to Chapter 14.08 of the Municipal Code for a street name change of North Indian Avenue to North Indian Canyon Drive; and WHEREAS, on March 14, 2007, a review of the application was held by the Planning Commission and a resolution of intention was adopted in accordance with the applicable law; and WHEREAS, notice of public hearing of the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Springs to consider Case No. 5.1147 — SNC was given in accordance with applicable law; and WHEREAS, on April 25, 2007, the Planning Commission held a public hearing for said street name change application; and WHEREAS, the proposed project is not considered a "project" pursuant to the terms of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), and has been determined to be Exempt pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has carefully reviewed and considered all of the evidence presented in connection with the review of the project, including, but not limited to, the staff report, and all written and oral testimony presented. THE PLANNING COMMISSION HEREBY FINDS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, the project has been determined to be Exempt per Section 15061(b)(3)(General Rule). The project has no possibility of causing a significant effect on the environment. Section 2: The change of Indian Avenue to Indian Canyon Drive is the best option if the street name is to be changed — the name has historical value with the City and is an extension of an existing street name which will connect the northern portion of the City with the core. Planning Commission Resolution Case 5.1147 — SNC April 25, 2007 Page 2 of 2 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that, based upon the foregoing, the Planning Commission hereby approves Case No. 5.1147 — SNC, subject to those conditions set forth in the attached Exhibit A, which are to be satisfied unless otherwise specified. ADOPTED this 25t' day of May, 2007. AYES: 4, Hutcheson, Cohen, Hochanadel, Marantz NOES: None ABSENT: 3, Ringlein, Scott, Caffery ABSTAIN: None ATTEST: CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA Cr ' ing, AICP D ecturof Planning S vices Case No. 5.1147 — SNC Indian Avenue to Indian Canyon Drive April 25, 2007 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Before final acceptance of the project, all conditions listed below shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, the Director of Planning, the Chief of Police, the Fire Chief or their designee, depending on which department recommended the condition. Any agreements, easements or covenants required to be entered into shall be in a form approved by the City Attorney. PLANNING DEPARTMENT: 1. The proposed development of the premises shall conform to all applicable regulations of the Palm Springs Zoning Ordinance, Municipal Code, or any other City Codes, ordinances and resolutions which supplement the zoning district regulations. 1 a. The owner shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Palm Springs, its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Palm Springs or its agents, officers or employees to attach, set aside, void or annul, an approval of the City of Palm Springs, its legislative body, advisory agencies, or administrative officers concerning Case 5.1147 — SNC. The City of Palm Springs will promptly notify the applicant of any such claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Palm Springs and the applicant will either undertake defense of the matter and pay the City's associated legal costs or will advance funds to pay for defense of the matter by the City Attorney. If the City of Palm Springs fails to promptly notify the applicant of any such claim, action or proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the applicant shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City of Palm Springs. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the City retains the right to settle or abandon the matter without the applicant's consent but should it do so, the City shall waive further indemnification hereunder, except, the City's decision to settle or abandon a matter following an adverse judgment or failure to appeal, shall not cause a waiver of the indemnification rights herein. 2. This approval shall be contingent upon similar approvals granted by Riverside County and the City of Desert Hot Springs, such that the entire Planning Commission COAs Case 5.1147 — 5NC April 25, 2007 Page 2 of 2 length of Indian Avenue between Interstate 10 and Highway 62 is renamed to Indian Canyon Drive. 3. The applicant shall bear all the costs associated with this street name change, including cost of changing street signs. 4. The applicant shall submit to the Director of Planning Services a date coordinated with the City of Palm Springs' City Engineer, Riverside County and the City of Desert Hot Springs at which all street signs are to be replaced. END OF CONDITIONS EO