HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC Resolution _5001- Case 5.0728 GPARESOLUTION NO, 5001
OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM
SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY
COUNCIL APPROVAL OF CASE 5.0728 GPA, VARIOUS
AMENDMENTS TO THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE AND
CIRCULATION ELEMENTS FOR 640 ACRES BOUND BY ALEJO
ROAD TO THE NORTH, SUNRISE WAY TO THE EAST, RAMON
ROAD TO THE SOUTH, AND SOUTH INDIAN CANYON DRIVE TO
THE WEST, ZONE C-1, C-1 AA, C-2, R-G-A(8), R-2, R-4, R-4-VP,
PD-101, PD-180, AND PD-164, SECTION 14. AMENDMENTS ARE
AS FOLLOWS:
A) GENERAL PLAN MAP AMENDMENT TO:
i) REDESIGNATE THE FOLLOWING AREAS FROM H43130
(HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) TO RC (RESORT
COMMERCIAL):
• SOUTH 314 OF THE BLOCK BOUND BY CALLE
ENCILIA, AMADO ROAD, CALLE EL SEGUNDO,
AND ALEJO ROAD;
• SOUTH HALF OF THE BLOCK BOUND BY CALLE
ENCILIA, TAHQUITZ CANYON WAY, CALLE EL
SEGUNDO, AND ARENAS ROAD;
• SOUTH HALF OF THE BLOCK BOUND BY CALLE
EL SEGUNDO, TAHQUITZ CANYON WAY,
AVENIDA CABALLEROS, AND ARENAS ROAD;
• SOUTH HALF OF THE BLOCK BOUND BY
AVENIDA CABALLEROS, TAHQUITZ CANYON
WAY, HERMOSA DRIVE, AND ARENAS ROAD;
• SOUTH HALF OF THE BLOCK BOUND BY
HERMOSA DRIVE, TAHQUITZ CANYON WAY,
SUNRISE WAY, AND ARENAS ROAD (DELETED
PORTION);
• NORTH HALF OF THE BLOCK BOUND BY CALLE
ALVARADO, AMADO ROAD, AVENIDA
CABALLEROS, AND TAHQUITZ CANYON WAY;
• NORTH HALF OF THE BLOCK BOUND BY
AVENIDA CABALLEROS, AMADO ROAD,
HERMOSA DRIVE, AND TAHQUITZ CANYON
WAY;
• NORTH HALF OF THE BLOCK BOUND BY
HERMOSA DRIVE, ANDREAS ROAD, SUNRISE
WAY, AND TAHQUITZ CANYON WAY;
ii) REDESIGNATE THE FOLLOWING AREA FROM RC
(RESORT COMMERCIAL) TO CBD (CENTRAL BUSINESS
DISTRICT):
• EAST HALF OF THE BLOCK BOUND BY ARENAS
ROAD, CALLE ENCILIA, RAMON ROAD, AND
SOUTH INDIAN CANYON DRIVE;
iii) REDESIGNATE THE FOLLOWING AREA FROM CBD
(CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT) TO RC (RESORT
COMMERCIAL):
• WEST HALF OF THE BLOCK BOUND BY ALEJO
ROAD, CALLE ENCILIA, AMADO ROAD, AND
SOUTH INDIAN CANYON DRIVE;
iv) REDESIGNATE THE FOLLOWING AREA FROM H30
(MEDIUM HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) TO H 43/30
(HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL):
• SOUTH HALF OF THE BLOCK BOUND BY CALLE
EL SEGUNDO, ARENAS ROAD, AVENIDA
CABALLEROS, AND SATURNINO ROAD;
v) REDESIGNATE THE FOLLOWING AREAS FROM M15
(MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) TO H 43/30 (HIGH
DENSITY RESIDENTIAL):
• WEST QUARTER OF THE BLOCK BOUND BY
AVENIDA CABALLEROS, BARISTO FLOOD
CONTROL CHANNEL, HERMOSA DRIVE, AND
RAMON ROAD;
• EAST QUARTER OF THE BLOCK BOUND BY
AVENIDA CABALLEROS, BARISTO FLOOD
CONTROL CHANNEL, HERMOSA DRIVE, AND
RAMON ROAD;
• EAST HALF OF THE WEST HALF OF THE BLOCK
BOUND BY BARISTO FLOOD CONTROL
CHANNEL, SUNRISE WAY, RAMON ROAD, AND
HERMOSA DRIVE;
vi} REDESIGNATE THE FOLLOWING AREAS FROM M8
(MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) TO H43/30 (HIGH
DENSITY RESIDENTIAL):
• SOUTH HALF OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE
BLOCK BOUND BY ALEJO ROAD, AVENIDA
CABELLEROS, AMADO ROAD, AND CALLE EL
SEGUNDO;
• SOUTH HALF OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE
BLOCK BOUND BY ALEJO ROAD, HERMOSA
DRIVE, AMADO ROAD, AND AVENIDA
CABALLEROS;
• SOUTH HALF OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE
BLOCK BOUND BY ALEJO ROAD, SUNRISE WAY,
AMADO ROAD, AND HERMOSA DRIVE;
} GENERAL PLAN CIRCULATION MAP AMENDMENT TO:
• RECLASSIFY SATURNINO ROAD BETWEEN
CALLE EL SEGUNDO AND AVENIDA
CABALLEROS FROM A SECONDARY
THOROUGHFARE TO A COLLECTOR STREET;
RECLASSIFY ARENAS ROAD BETWEEN AVENIDA
CABALLEROS AND HERMOSA DRIVE FROM A
SECONDARY THOROUGHFARE TO A
COLLECTOR STREET;
DELETE HERMOSA DRIVE BETWEEN ARENAS
ROAD AND BARISTO ROAD;
WHEREAS, the Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians and the City of Palm Springs (the
"applicant") have initiated Case 5.0728, a request for various amendments to the General Plan
Land Use and Circulation Elements; and
WHEREAS, notice of a public hearing of the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Springs to
consider Case No. 5.0728 GPA, a request for various amendments to the General Plan Land Use
and Circulation Elements, was given in accordance with applicable law; and
WHEREAS, on November 26, 2003, a public hearing on Case 5.0728, requests for various
amendments to the General Plan Land Use and Circulation Elements was held by the Planning
Commission in accordance with applicable law; and
WHEREAS, on January 28, 2004, a public hearing on Case 5.0728, requests for various
amendments to the General Plan Land Use and Circulation Elements was held by the Planning
Commission in accordance with applicable law; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the National
Environmental Protection Act, an Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement
was prepared and it was found that with the incorporation of proposed mitigation measures, the
proposed project could not have a significant effect on the environment; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has carefully reviewed and considered all of the evidence
presented in connection with the hearing on the project, including but not limited to the staff report,
all written and oral testimony presented.
THE PLANNING COMMISSION HEREBY FINDS AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1: The proposed General Plan Amendments are in compliance with the Environmental
Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement has been completed forthe Section
14 Master Development Plan/Specific Plan and is in compliance with CEQA, NEPA,
the State CEQA Guidelines, and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The EIR/EIS for Case
No. 5.0728 adequately addresses the general environmental setting of the
proposed Project, its significant environmental impacts, and the alternatives and
mitigation measures related to each significant environmental effect for the
proposed project. The Planning Commission has independently reviewed and
considered the Specific Plan and determined that it is in conformance with the
information contained in the Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact
Statement. The Planning Commission further finds that with the incorporation of
proposed mitigation measures and the adoption of the Statement of Overriding
Considerations, potentially significant environmental impacts resulting from this
Section 2:
project will be reduced to a level of insignificance and therefore recommends
certification of the EIRIEIS for this project.
The proposed General Plan Amendments to the Land Use Element seek to more
closely direct the clustering of uses to particular areas while still allowing for mixed -
use and plan flexibility. In general, most of the medium density residential
designations that are surrounded by existing high density residential designations
have been replaced by high density residential. In addition, the Resort Commercial
designation has been extended along the Tahquitz Canyon Way corridor and north
towards Amado Road in order to eliminate areas of split General Plan designations
on blocks of land. The Resort Commercial designation may facilitate future,
consolidated development at identified "catalyst opportunity" sites. Chapter 9 of the
Specific Plan links the proposed land uses with existing General Plan policies. The
proposed amendments will allow some of the General Plan objectives regarding
economic activity, the Central Business District, Tahquitz Canyon Way, and
circulation to be realized.
The proposed amendments to the General Plan Circulation Element include
requests to reclassify streets within Section 14 in order to match existing street
improvements. The proposed amendments will also facilitate the creation of
alternative street sections that allow for diverse modes of transportation (bike paths,
pedestrian walkways, shuttle lanes) and an attractive streetscape. The traffic study
completed for Section 14 indicated that many of the street designations and future
improvements would result in roads that have a greater capacity than projected
future traffic volumes (Year 2010). Special street sections proposed for Alejo Road
and other streets are not included in the proposed amendments because they are
deemed consistent with existing General Plan Policy 7.1.5., which allows for
modified street cross sections. City and Tribal staff will continue to consult with
regards to how the existing street cross sections will be transitioned to proposed
street cross sections, especially in areas that are already built out.
Section 3: The amendments to the Land Use and Circulation Elements of the General Plan are
necessary and appropriate in order to build consistency between the Section 14
Master Development Plan/Specific Plan and the General Plan Map and Report.
Section 4: The proposed amendment to the General Plan Circulation Element is necessary
and proper at this time, and is not likely to be detrimental to the adjacent property
or residents.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that, based upon the foregoing, the Planning Commission
hereby the amendments to the General Plan Land Use and Circulation Elements as shown in
Exhibits A and B.
ADOPTED this 2e day of January, 2004.
AYES: Conrad, Marantz, Matthews, Grence
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN: Wright, Shoenberger, Hochanadel
ATTEST: CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA
Pl ning Commission gairman
1
AwIM2,�,-
Planrfin-g Ccfnmission Secretary
EXHIBIT A
PROPOSED GENERA!_ PLAN MAP AMENDMENTS
SECTION 14
A-
PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN CIRCULATION MAP AMENDMENTS