Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC Resolution _4870- Case 5.0966 GPARESOLUTION NO. 4870 OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT SO AS TO REDESIGNATE 5.8 ACRES FROM L2 (LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 2 UNITS/ACRE) TO L6 (LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 4-6 UNITSIACRE) FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SOUTH PALM CANYON DRIVE AND MURRAY CANYON DRIVE, ZONE R-2, SECTION 36.. WHEREAS, the City of Palm Springs, Hollyhills Development, and Jay Reynolds for Palm Canyon Townhomes, LLC, (the "applicant") have filed an application for a General Plan Map Amendment to redesignate 5.8 acres of land from L2 (Low Density Residential 2 units/acre) to L6 (Low Density Residential 4-6 unitslacre) for property located at the northwest corner of South Palm Canyon Drive and Murray Canyon Drive; and WHEREAS, notice of a public hearing of the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Springs to consider Case No. 5.0966 GPA, a request to amend the General Plan Map, was given in accordance with applicable law; and WHEREAS, on August 13, 2003 a public hearing to consider Case No. 5.0966 GPA, a request to amend the General Plan Map, was held by the Planning Commission in accordance with applicable law; and WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 15063 of the California Environmental Quality Act, an Initial Study was prepared and staff found that the proposed project could not have a significant effect on the environment; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has carefully reviewed and considered all of the evidence presented in connection with the hearing on the project, including but not limited to the staff report, all written and oral testimony presented. THE PLANNING COMMISSION HEREBY FINDS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: Pursuant to CEQA, the Planning Commission finds that the current environmental assessment for Case No. 5.0966 GPA adequately addresses the general environmental setting of the proposed Project, its significant environmental impacts, and the mitigation measures related to each significant environmental effect for the proposed project. The Planning Commission further finds that with the incorporation of proposed mitigation measures, potentially significant environmental impacts resulting from this project will be reduced to a level of insignificance and therefore recommends adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project Section 2: Currently, all 4 lots are zoned R-2 (Limited Multiple Family), which is inconsistent with the General Plan designation of L2. The L2 designation is typically associated with single family residential estate -type housing. The 4 lots are surrounded by multi -family development to the south, west, north, and east as well as a timeshare resort to the east of the Palm Canyon Townhomes project. The 4 lots also either have frontage or are near South Palm Canyon Drive. Given the existing and future development around the lots, staff found that an L6 designation would be more appropriate for the 4 lots. The proposed L6 designation would allow multi=family development consistent with the surrounding development. The proposed General Plan Amendment will facilitate the construction of up to 35 units on 5.8 acres. The project site is currently zoned R-2, inconsistent with the General Plan designation of L2. In 1993, the City embarked on a zoning consistency program. However the program was not completed with respect to the 4 lots and therefore, the property has remained zoned for multi -family land uses but designated for single family uses on the General Plan. In analyzing the development of the surrounding community since 1993, staff concluded that the multi -family designation of L6 (Low Density Residential 4-6 units/acre) would be appropriate for the project site, given the multi -family land uses immediately in the vicinity of the project site. A General Plan Amendment is proposed to change the designation of the property from L2 to L6. The L6 designation is consistent and compatible with the existing development pattern in the neighborhood, as the project is surrounded by the Canyon Heights condominiums to the west and south, Vista Canyon condominiumsto the north, and residential condominiums and a timeshare resort to the east. The current designation of L2 is associated primarily with single-family residential estate -type land uses, which may not be appropriate given the location of the site, surrounding land uses and zoning, and proximity of the site to a secondary thoroughfare. With the approval of the General Plan Amendment, the proposed project will not result in any conflicts with the General Plan or zoning ordinance. Section 3: The amendment to the General Plan will result in the proposed change of zone being in conformity with the General Plan Map and Report. Section 4: The subject property is suitable for the uses intended in the General Plan designation and the uses permitted in the proposed zone, in terms of access, size of parcel, relationship to similar or related uses, and other considerations deemed relevant by the Commission. Section 5: The proposed change of zone and change of General Plan designation is necessary and proper at this time, and is not likely to be detrimental to the adjacent property or residents. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that, based upon the foregoing, the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve Case No. 5.0966 GPA, as shown in Exhibit A. ADOPTED this 13' day of August, 2003. AYES: Shoenberger, Marantz, Grence, Conrad, Wright, Hochanadel NOES: ABSENT: Matthews ABSTAIN: ATTEST: �,OL,_ �__ _ U4AJ Cha an of the Planning Vommission CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA Secre aryf the Planning Commission