Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC Resolution _4859- Case 6.470 VARRESOLUTION NO.4859 OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CASE NO. 6.470 FOR A VARIANCE TO THE REAR YARD SETBACK BACKING ON A FAIRWAY TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A BREAKFAST AND FAMILY ROOM WITHIN TEN (10) FEET OF THE REAR PROPERTY LINE OF A SINGLE- FAMILY RESIDENCE AT 2320 S. CAMINO REAL, ZONE R- 1-C, SECTION 26. WHEREAS, Michael Kahn, (the "Applicant') filed an application with the City pursuant to section 94.06.00 of the Zoning Ordinance for a variance to the rear yard setback backing on a fairway at the single-family residence located at 2320 S. Camino Real, Zone R-1-C, Section 26; and WHEREAS, notice of a public hearing of the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Springs to consider an application for Variance 6.470 was issued in accordance with applicable law; and WHEREAS, on June 25, 2003, the public hearing on the application for Variance 6.470 was held by the Planning Commission in accordance with applicable law; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has carefully reviewed and considered all of the evidence presented in connection with the hearing on the project, including but not limited to the staff report, and afl written and oral testimony presented. THE PLANNING COMMISSION HEREBY FINDS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: Section 2: Pursuant to CEQA, the Planning Commission finds that this project is categorically exempt from Califomia Environmental Quality Guidelines (CEQA). Pursuant to Zoning Ordinance Section 94.06.00.13, the Planning Commission finds that: Because of special circumstances applicable to subject property, including size, shape, topography, location, or surroundings, the strict application of the Zoning Ordinance would deprive subject property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity and under identical zone classification. The subject property is substandard with respect to minimum lot depth for the zone (R- 1-C) within which the property is located. The irregular lot configuration also restricts the property owner's ability to site a living space addition. The proposed living space addition is a right enjoyed by adjacent property owners. Therefore, special circumstances are applicable to the subject property that justify variance to the strict application of the Zoning Code. Any variance granted shall be subject to such conditions as will assure that the adjustment thereby authorized shall not constitute a grant of special p&#ege inconsistent with the limitations upon other properties in the vicinity and zone in which subject property is situated This variance has been conditioned to ensure that all other applicable codes and requirements will be met, and to ensure that this variance may be utilized only for the proposed use. 3. The granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, convenience, or welfare or injurious to property and improvements in the same vicinity and zone in which subject property is situated. This variance has been conditioned to ensure that the Canyon Country Club Homeowner's Association Architectural Control Committee will review the project to ensure that the granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to adjacent property owners ensuring public health, safety, convenience and welfare. 4. The granting of such variance will not adversely affect the General Plan of the City. The General Plan of the City of Palm Springs will not be adversely affected by the granting of the proposed variance to rear year setback backing on a fairway. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that, based upon the foregoing, the Planning Commission hereby approves Variance 6.470, subject to the conditions set forth in the attached Exhibit A. ADOPTED this 26h day of June, 2003. AYES: Klatchko, Caffery, Conrad, Grence, Marantz, Shoenberger NOES: ABSENT: Matthews ABSTENTIONS: ATTEST: CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA 51165Airman of the Plan g Commission Secrets o e Planning Commission