HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC Resolution _4824- Case 5.0937- CUPRESOLUTION NO. 4824
RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM
SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL
APPROVE CASE NO. 5.0937-CUP, AN APPLICATION BY THE PALM
SPRINGS TENNIS CLUB MEMBERS ASSOCIATION, FOR AN
EXPANSION OF THE PALM SPRINGS TENNIS CENTER, TO INCLUDE
THE ADDITION OF SEVEN NIGHT LIGHTED TENNIS COURTS AND A
576 SQUARE FOOT LOUNGE BUILDING, LOCATED 1300 BARISTO
ROAD EAST, ZONE R-4, SECTION 14.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has received a request for a Conditional Use Permit
to an expansion of the Palm Springs Tennis Center, including the addition of seven night
lighted tennis courts and a 576 square foot lounge building for use by the members of the
Palm Springs Tennis Club Association; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Ordinance requires that tennis courts which vary from the
standards established by Section 93.01.01.13, be processed through the Conditional Use
Permit process and Section 94.02.00.A.2.v, which authorizes privately operated outdoor
recreation centers through the Conditional Use Permit process; and
WHEREAS, notice of public hearing of the Planning Commission of the City of Palm
Springs to consider the application for a Conditional Use Permit No. 5.0937-CUP was
circulated and published in accordance with applicable law; and
WHEREAS, on January 8, 2003, a public hearing on the application for a conditional use
permit was held by the Planning Commission in accordance with applicable law; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has carefully reviewed and considered all of the
evidence presented in connection with the hearing on the project, including but not limited to the
staff report, and all written and oral testimony presented.
THE PLANNING COMMISSION HEREBY FINDS AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1: Pursuant to CEQA, the Planning Commission finds as follows
Pursuant to CEQA, the Planning Commission finds that this project is
categorically exempt from California Environmental Quality Guidelines (CEQA)_
Section 2: Pursuant to Zoning Ordinance Section 93.01.01, the Planning Commission finds that:
a. The use applied for at the location set forth in the application is properly one for which
a Conditional Use Permit is authorized by the City's zoning ordinance.
Tennis courts may be allowed under conditional use permit approved by the Planning
Commission in accordance with Sections 93.01.01.13 and 94.02.00.A.2.v which
authorizes privately operated outdoor recreation centers through the Conditional Use
Permit process.
b. The said use is necessary or desirable for the development of the community, and is
in harmony with the various elements or objectives of the General Plan, and is not
detrimental to the existing or future uses specifically permitted in the zone in which the
proposed use is to be located.
The proposed use and improvements are desirable in that it will provide additional
recreation opportunities for residents, guests and visitors. The proposed project is
consistent with the objectives of the General Plan, and will not be detrimental to the
existing or future permitted uses within the R-4 zone in which the proposed use is to
be located.
The site for the intended use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate said
use, including yards, setbacks, walls or fences, landscaping and other features
required in order to adjust said use to those existing or permitted future uses of land
in the neighborhood.
The proposed project site exceeds the minimum lot area requirements for the intended
use. As such, the project site is adequate in size, shape, and area to accommodate the
proposed use, including yards, setbacks, lot area, required parking, opens space and
other features required.
As proposed the project would be setback I'from the right of way of the future Arenas
Road. The City is currently processing an application for a project, 48 @ Baristo, that
includes a General Plan Amendment which, if approved, would result in the deletion of
a portion of Arenas Road, between Hermosa Drive and Sunrise Way, from the General
Plan Circulation Map. A traffic study which supports this General Plan Amendment has
been prepared by the applicant and submitted to the City. The portion of Arenas Road
proposed forvacation is directly adjacentto this project. If the General Plan Amendment
is approved, the Amendment would eliminate the need for future dedication of Arenas
Road right of way adjacent to this project.
The General Plan designates Hermosa Drive as a Collector Street with a 60' right of
way and a 30' half street right of way. The proposed project is set back 17' from the
edge of the future Right of Way. The side yard setback requirements for the R4 zone
is 15', therefore the tennis courts would not be located in this setback area. The
Engineering Department is requesting the 30' half street dedication of Hermosa. The
Planning Department recommends requiring an irrevocable offer of dedication during
the period of the lease agreement.
d. The site for the proposed use relates to streets and highways properly designed and
improved to carry the type and quantity of traffic to be generated by the proposed use.
The project site is accessed by public streets which are adequate to serve the
residential neighborhood within which the site is located. The project is located on
leased land. The applicant is a tenant in a complicated land lease. The duration of the
conditional use permit parallels the terms of the lease arrangement. The proposed
improvements are such that they would not preclude future street improvements in
accordance with the General Plan.
The General Plan designates Hermosa Drive as a Collector Street with a 60' right of
way and a 30' half street right of way. The Engineering Department is requesting the
30' half street dedication of Hermosa.
e. The conditions to be imposed are deemed necessary to protect the public health, safety
and general welfare, of the existing neighborhood in which this project is situated.
All proposed conditions of approval are necessary to ensure compliance with Zoning
Ordinance requirements and to ensure the public health, safety and welfare.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that, based upon the foregoing, the Planning
Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve Conditional Use Permit 5.0937-
CUP, subject to those conditions set forth in the attached Exhibit A, which are to be satisfied
prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy unless otherwise specified.
ADOPTED this 8' day of January, 2003.
AYES: Shoenberger, Marantz, Conrad, Caffery
NOES:
ABSENT: Matthews
ABSTENTIONS: Klatchko, Grence
CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA
Secretary of the planning Commission
m
m
m