Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC Resolution _4822-Case 5.0934 GPMRESOLUTION NO.4822 OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT TO REDESIGNATE 2.17 ACRES OF LAND FROM P (PROFESSIONAL) TO M15 (MEDIUM -HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF VISTA CHINO AND SUNRISE WAY, ZONE R-2 AND P, SECTION 11. WHEREAS, McCormack, Baron, and Salazar Inc. (the "applicant") has filed an application with the City for a General Plan Map Amendment to redesignate 2.17 acres of land from P (Professional) to M 15 (Medium Density 12-15 units/acre) for the property located at the southwest corner of Vista Chino and Sunrise Way; and WHEREAS, notice of a public hearing of the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Springs to consider Case No. 5.0934, a request to amend the General Plan Map, was given in accordance with applicable law; and WHEREAS, on February 11, 2003 a public hearing to consider Case No. 5.0934, a request to amend the General Plan Map, was held by the Planning Commission in accordance with applicable law; and WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 15063 of the California Environmental Quality Act, an Environmental Assessment was prepared and staff found that with the incorporation of proposed mitigation measures, the proposed project could not have a significant effect on the environment; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has carefully reviewed and considered all of the evidence presented in connection with the hearing on the project, including but not limited to the staff report, all written and oral testimony presented. THE PLANNING COMMISSION HEREBY FINDS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: Pursuant to CEQA, the Planning Commission finds that the current environmental assessment for Case No. 5.0934 adequately addresses the general environmental setting of the proposed Project, its significant environmental impacts, and the mitigation measures related to each significant environmental effect for the proposed project. The Planning Commission furtherfinds that with the incorporation of proposed mitigation measures, potentially significant environmental impacts resulting from this project will be reduced to a level of insignificance and therefore recommends adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project. Section 2: The General Plan Amendment is proposed to amend approximately 2.17 acres from the Professional (P) land use designation to the Medium Density Residential 12-15 units/acre (M15) land use designation, for development as multi -family housing. In this case, the residential usage is closely related to the counseling and public health services both currently provided and proposed for the site, as well as to the existing multi family residential locates to the west, south and east of the project location. Section 3: Planned Development District 281 in -lieu of a change of zone is being proposed in n concert with the requested General Plan Map Amendment. The designation of the v subject property from P to M15 will allow PD-281 to be consistent with the General Plan. The amendment to the General Plan will result in the proposed amendments considered under PD-281 to be in conformity with the General Plan Map and Report. Section 4: The re -designation of the subject property to MI 5 is appropriate due to surrounding multiple family land use designations. The properties to the west and south are zoned R-2 (Limited Multi -Family Residential Zone) and designated M15. The proposed General Plan Map Amendment is a logical extension of the General Plan designations to the west and south. The location of the housing along the northern portion of the subject property is appropriate in order to continue the pattern of multi -family residential land use to the west and allow a reasonable distance between the transitional housing and the single family housing to the southwest. The proposed amendment will only impact a small portion of the entire 10.5 acre site. To the north of the subject property is single family residential zoned property and a neighbourhood shopping center, to the east is a community shopping center, to the south is condominiums and offices, and to the west is senior housing, a church, and middle school. The proposed General Plan Amendment is consistent with surrounding multi -family land use designations and closely relates to the counseling and public health services currently provided and proposed for the site. The parking lot to the south of the housing will facilitate the transition to single family residential uses to the southwest. Therefore, the General Plan Amendment is appropriate and will not be detrimental to the neighbourhood. O Section 5: The proposed change of General Plan designation is necessary and proper at this time, and is not likely to be detrimental to the adjacent property or residents. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that, based upon the foregoing, the Planning Commission hereby recommends approval of the General Plan Map amendment as shown in Exhibit A. ADOPTED this 11' day of February, 2003. AYES: Marantz, Caffery, Klatchko NOES: Conrad ABSENT: Shoenberger ABSTAIN: Matthews, Grence ATTEST: CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA Panning Commission Chairman Planning C&nmission Secretary MMMINI>Yff_1 PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN MAP AMENDMENT Professional (P) to Medium Density Residential 12-15 units/acre (M 15) APN #s 507-100-030 507-100-039 507-100-040 f m m