Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC Resolution _4699- Case 5.0779RESOLUTION NO. 4699 OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING, SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS STATED, A ONE (1) YEAR TIME EXTENSION FOR CASE NOS. 5.0779 (CUP) AND 6.423 (VARIANCE) FOR AN APPROVED WIND ENERGY CONVERSION SYSTEM (WECS) FACILITY CONSISTING OF 10 600-700 KW, 233 FOOT TALL WIND TURBINE GENERATORS AND ASSOCIATED APPURTENANCES AND A FACILITY YARD ON 78.13 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED SOUTH OF INTERSTATE 10 AND GARNET AVENUE AND WEST OF INDIAN AVENUE IN PORTIONS OF LAND IN SECTION 16AND 21, T3S, R4E, SBBM: APNS 668-412-001 AND 669-040-006 (WECS 16 WEST); E-1 ZONE, WHEREAS, Mr. Michael Azeka of Seawest Windpower, Inc. (the "applicant") has filed an application for the first time extension for Case No. 5.0779 for an approved Wind Energy Coversion System (WECS) facility consisting of 10 600-700 kW, 233 foot tall wind turbine generators and associated appurtenances and a facility yard on 78.13 acres of land located south of Interstate 10 and Garnet Avenue and west of Indian Avenue in portions of land in Section 16 and 21, T3S, R4E, SBBM: APNS 668-412-001 and 669-040-006 (WECS 16 West); E-1 Zone; and WHEREAS, on July 22, 1998, the applications as described above were approved 6-0-1 by the Planning Commission pursuant to the conditions of approval contained in Resolution No. 4596; and WHEREAS, the applicant is requesting an additional year to complete final engineering design, secure construction financing, and obtain building permits; and WHEREAS, the request for time extension would keep the application active until July 22, 2001;and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered the applicant's time extension request for the project at its duly noticed meeting held on July 12, 2000; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has independently reviewed all evidence provided including the staff report dated July 12, 2000 and all other written and oral testimony, and finds the project, subject to the original conditions of approval (Exhibit A), consistent with the requirements of the ordinances of the City and with State law; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Springs, California, after considering the evidence provided at the meeting does hereby recommend approval of the first 92-month time extension for Case Nos. 5.0779 -CUP and 6.423 (Variance) for property herein described, subject to the original conditions contained in Exhibit A. ADOPTED this 12th I day of July , 2000. AYES: Mills, Jurasky, Shoenberger, Klatchko, Caffery, Matthews, Raya NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA Planning Commission Chairman Plannying Commi ion Secretary EO 101