Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 4B - SantaRosa_Presentation_20250506Avery Field Cabin Ruins HSPB #114 – CLASS 1 HISTORIC SITE Case # CAMJ 2025–0001 Certificate of Appropriateness May 6, 2025 PLANNING SERVICES DEPARTMENT Project Site & Context PLANNING SERVICES DEPARTMENT Proposed Review •Alteration of Class 1 Historic Resource (Section 8.05.110) • Property address: Avery Cabin Ruins (APN #513-193-001) •Zone District: Single Family Residential Zone (R1A) •General Plan: Open Space – Estate Residential (ER) Historic Context / Current Condition PLANNING SERVICES DEPARTMENT Avery Edwin Field, 1922Source: Field Family/Idyllwild Area Historical Society Avery Field Cabin Ruins, 2025 Background •“Avery Field Cabin Ruins” designated as a Class 1 historic site in 2019. •Character-defining historic features listed as follows: •The rock fireplace •The rock and poured concrete knee walls at the perimeter of the cabin ruins •The concrete floor •The stone steps east of the cabin leading from what presumable was the Tahquitz Ditch up to the cabin PLANNING SERVICES DEPARTMENT Proposed Project Proposed Plan: •Construction of a new single- family home • Construction barrier around the historic ruin with environmental monitors to observe the site •Landscape/site improvements around the home surrounded by a fence •Hillside Lot requires additional design review by Architectural Review Committee (ARC) for compliance Municipal Code Section 8.05.110.E Criteria for Alterations of Class 1 Historic Resources Criterion 1: That the proposed alteration does not significantly impact or materially impair the character- defining features of the historic resource as listed in the resolution for historic designation, or, where a character-defining feature may be impacted, the proposed alteration minimizes that impact as much as possible; Criterion 2: That the proposed alteration will assist in restoring the historic resource to its original appearance where applicable, or will substantially aid its preservation or enhancement as a historic resource; Criterion 3: That any additions to the historic resource are consistent with the massing, proportions, materials, and finishes of the existing historic resource, and: (i) can be distinguished from the existing historic resource as may be appropriate; or (ii) are indistinguishable from the historic resource as may be appropriate, and where such alterations are clearly documented in the City’s archival file for the historic resource as being non-original to the historic resource; Criterion 4: That, in cases where Federal funds are to be utilized in financing the proposed alterations, the alterations are consistent with the Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties, as put forth by the U.S. Secretary of the Interior. Conclusion The proposed scope of work does not materially impair or negatively impact the character-defining features of the historic site. The proposed single-family home is adequately distanced from the new construction and the maintenance of the historic ruin is the responsibility of the owner in accordance with the conditions for historic designation. Staff finds that all required criteria for the Certificate of Appropriateness are met with the proposed conditions of approval. Recommendation Staff recommends the HSPB approve the Certificate of Appropriateness with conditions: 1. Environmental monitors required during the grading phase of the project, 2. Provide a “long-term maintenance plan” for the historic resource, 3. Preservation/conservation treatment of existing ruins, and 4. Amend Mills Act Agreement. Any significant changes to the proposal must be re-evaluated for compliance with the criteria for alteration. PLANNING SERVICES DEPARTMENT