HomeMy WebLinkAboutStudy Session - Public Comments re_ Proposed development by Nexus Development Corporation - B RamosFrom:Brian Ramos
To:Planning
Subject:Public Comments re: Proposed development by Nexus Development Corporation
Date:Tuesday, March 25, 2025 1:16:57 PM
NOTICE: This message originated outside of The City of Palm Springs -- DO NOT CLICK on links or open attachments
unless you are sure the content is safe.
Dear Planning Commission,
I am writing regarding your Study Session about the proposed development by Nexus Development
Corporation in the Twin Palms Neighborhood. As you are aware, the State of California has mandated
that each municipality contribute additional housing stock to meet the increased demand for housing
for residents. My concern with the proposed development is that the developer is seeking a zoning
change to REDUCE the number of housing units built on this parcel of land. A change from its current R-3
zoning would significantly and permanently limit the number of housing units that can be built on that
site.
Any change to the zoning of this parcel to reduce the number of units that can be built on this site
would require that other sites either be reclassified to make up for the lower density built in this parcel.
Any reductions in capacity in one parcel has ripple effects throughout the city and limits our city’s ability
to meet the state requirements for additional units.
I request that your commission insist that the developer resubmit their plan addressing the density
requirements of R-3 housing. The developer needs to look no further than the Ocotillo Lodge to see how
the Alexander Construction Company met an increased demand for housing (then rental) in 1957.
There, they offered smaller units (1 bed/1 bath) with communal amenities. A 2025 version of the Ocotillo
Lodge, with density conforming to R-3, could be built on this site, fitting in with the both the zoning
requirements and the other buildings that surround the subject property.
Additionally, access to the subject property should be from East Palm Canyon Drive, not East Twin Palms
Drive in order to reduce the impact to the neighboring homes.
The staff report sums up my concerns perfectly: “considering the fact that large undeveloped parcels
are scarce in the area, the City aims to increase local housing supply, and single-family residences are
prohibited in the R-3 Zone, a project which proposes higher density appears to be more desirable for the
site.”
Sincerely,
Brian Ramos