HomeMy WebLinkAbout25264RESOLUTION NO. 25264
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE PALM
SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT TITLE VI PLAN AS
REQUIRED BY THE FEDERAL AVIATION
ADMINISTRATION (FAA) FOR RECIPIENTS OF FEDERAL
FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE
WHEREAS, the City of Palm Springs accepts awards of federal grants from the
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) for eligible projects at the Palm Springs
International Airport; and
WHEREAS, recipients of federal financial assistance from the FAA must take
affirmative action to ensure nondiscrimination in all Palm Springs International Airport
operations; and
WHEREAS, the FAA requires the submission of a Title VI Plan for Palm Springs
International Airport to ensure compliance with this requirement; and
WHEREAS, the Palm Springs International Airport seeks to ensure that no person
shall on the grounds of race, color, national origin (including limited English proficiency
(LEP)), sex (including sexual orientation and gender identity), creed, or age, as provided
by Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987 (PL
100.259), Section 520 of the Airport and Airway Improvement Act of 1982, and related
authorities (hereafter, "Title VI and related requirements"), be excluded from participation
in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under any
program or activity that receives U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) funding.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS DOES HEREBY
RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That the foregoing Recitals are true and correct and are incorporated
herein by this reference.
SECTION 2. That the City Council hereby adopts the Palm Springs International
Airport Title VI Plan attached hereto as Exhibit A.
SECTION 3. Severability. Should any individual component of this Resolution be
adjudicated to be invalid and unenforceable, the remaining provisions shall be and
continue to be fully effective.
SECTION 4. CEQA. The City Council finds this Resolution is not subject to the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in that the activity is covered by the general
rule that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant
effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty, as in this case, that there
Resolution No. 25264
Page 2
is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the
environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA.
SECTION 5. Effective Date. This Resolution will become effective immediately
upon adoption and remain effective unless superseded by a subsequent resolution.
ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025.
ell ZX7
Scott Stiles, City Manager
ATTEST:
Brenda Pree, MMC, CERA
City Cleric
Resolution No. 25264
Page 3
CERTIFICATION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss.
CITY OF PALM SPRINGS)
I, BRENDA PREE, City Clerk of the City of Palm Springs, hereby certify that
Resolution No. 25264 is a full, true, and correct copy, and was duly adopted at a regular
meeting of the City Council of the City of Palm Springs on the 9tn day of January 2024,
by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Garner, Ready, Bernstein, Mayor Pro Tern Soto, and
Mayor deHarte
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the
City of Palm Springs, California, this ILIl q day of January 2025.
G � — /"' e_'l - - -
rends Pree, MMC, CERA
City Clerk
L
Resolution No. 25264
Page 4
I
EXHIBIT "A"
palm springs
Title VI Plan
Palm Springs International Airport
1. Title VI Policy Statement'
Palm Springs International Airport, a department of the City of Palm Springs, assures that no
person shall on the grounds of race, color, national origin (including limited English proficiency
(LEP)), sex (including sexual orientation and gender identity), creed, or age, as provided by Title
VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987 (PL 100.259),
Section 520 of the Airport and Airway Improvement Act of 1982, and related authorities
(hereafter, "Title VI and related requirements"), be excluded from participation in, be denied the
benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under any program or activity that
receives U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) funding. Title VI also prohibits retaliation
for asserting or otherwise participating in claims of discrimination.
Palm Springs International Airport further assures every effort will be made to ensure
nondiscrimination in all of its programs and activities, whether those programs are federally
funded or not. The Airport Sponsor agrees, among other things, to understand the communities
surrounding or in the flight path, as well as customers that use the airport. Anytime communities
may be impacted by programs or activities the Palm Springs International Airport will take action
to involve them and the general public in the decision -making process.
Palm Springs International Airport requires nondiscrimination assurances, as prescribed by FAA,
from each tenant, contractor, and concessionaire providing an activity, service, or facility at the
airport. Assurances must be included in any related lease, contract, or franchise agreement
between Palm Springs International Airport and each tenant, contractor, and concessionaire, as
well as in any similar agreements with their own sub -tenants and sub -contractors.
Victoria Carpenter, Airport Administration Manager, available at 760.318.3808 and
Victoria.Carpenter@palmspringsca.gov, is responsible for overseeing Palm Springs International
Airport's compliance with Title VI and the point of contact for all airport Title VI matters and
related responsibilities, including those required by 49 CFR Part 21.
' This policy statement will be translated into languages other than English, upon request and based on patron and
local language demographics. 0
Resolution No. 25264
Page 5
Signature
Harry Barrett Jr., A.A.E.
Executive Director of Aviation
L
January 10, 2025
Effective Date
January 10, 2028
ear Expiration Date
Resolution No. 25264
Page 6
2. Administration
The City of Palm Springs City Council has reviewed and adopted this Title VI Plan for Palm
Springs International Airport. This plan will be updated no less than once every 3
years. The plan will not be re -adopted following minor changes, such as updating the
Airport Director's or Coordinator's name. Significant revisions to our policies or federal
guidelines may warrant re -adoption by the City of Palm Springs City Council and
resubmittal to FAA.
In addition to the Coordinator and airport sponsor's leadership, the following people also
assist with our Title VI program requirements:
Staff Supporting Title VI Pro
Jeremy Keating
Christina Brown
Edward Graff
Airport Sponsor Program / Office
Aviation Director
Program Administrator
Management Systems Manager
Palm Springs International Airport has the following airport program sub -recipients:
Sub -Recipients
NONE
As of the date of this plan, Palm Springs International Airport has the following pending
applications for Federal financial assistance:
Federal Source
Grant Number
Amount
FAA AIP SP-WPG-3-06-0181-064-2022 $571,158.00
FAA AIP SP-WPG-3-06-0181-065-2022 $181,320.00
FAA AIP SP-WPG-3-06-0181-066-2022 $126,924.00
FAA AIP SP-WPG-3-06-0181-067-2023 2,108,584.00
OTA 170TO4023T7672NO10 1,388,994.47
In addition, Palm Springs International Airport sub -recipients have the following pending
applications for Federal financial assistance (either directly from the FAA, or passed through
the State DOT):
Federal Source Grant Number I Amount
NONE
Updated information for pending and awarded grant applications will be available through
the following methods:
Federal Source Grant Award Information Available at:
FAA AIP . tt2s://www.faa.gov,,ain2orts/aip/
Resolution No. 25264
Page 7
OTA
3. Grant and Procurement Assurances
49 CFR § 21.7 (a)(1); 49 CFR Part 21 Appendix C (b)
Palm Springs International Airport will complete standard grant assurances for Title VI and
related requirements, in the form prescribed by FAA. See
https://www.faa.gov/aiMgqs..,'ai.p,,,'grant assurances..'#current-assurances.
Clauses/Covenants
a. All contracts, leases, deeds, licenses, permits and other similar instruments must contain the
contractual requirements and clauses, in the form prescribed by FAA. See
https: _www.faa.gov airports.�aip.procurement/federalcontract provisionsi. Note that unlike
many other clauses, Civil Rights clauses are required in all contracts. Note also special
clauses that are required for certain types of contracts, such as land acquisition.
b. Palm Springs International Airport requires Civil Rights clauses to be included in
solicitations and contracts for all subcontractors, subleases, and any other agreements.
Palm Springs International Airport follows the required FAA guidelines as it relates to
clauses that must form a part of solicitations and contracts. To ensure compliance as an
organization, we frequently review our forms against the FAA website so that capture
changes and update accordingly. In addition, the City of Palm Spring's Legal Department
reviews all vendor and/or customer agreements.
Description of Oversight Methods for Subcontracts
The following verbiage has been included in the Aviation Request for Proposals (RFPs) regarding
subcontracting or assignment:
"5.3 Prohibition A ainst Subcontracting or Assignment. The experience, knowledge, education,
capability, and reputation of Contractor, its principals and employees, were a substantial inducement for
City to enter into this Agreement. Contractor shall not contract with any other individual or entity to
perform any Services required under this Agreement without the City's express written approval. In
addition, neither this Agreement nor any interest may be assigned or transferred, voluntarily or by
operation of law, without the prior written approval of City. Subcontracts, if any, shall contain a provision
making them subject to all provisions stipulated in this Agreement including without limitation the
insurance and indemnification requirements. If Contractor is permitted to subcontract any part of this
Agreement by City, Contractor shall be responsible to City for the acts and omissions of its
subcontractor(s) in the same manner as it is for persons directly employed. Nothing contained in this
Agreement shall create any contractual relationships between any subcontractor and City."
L
Resolution No. 25264
Page 8
4. Title VI Coordinator Responsibilities 0
The Coordinator is responsible for ensuring that they and other staff supporting the Title VI are
trained in Title VI requirements. Essential training topics include:
• Basic Title VI requirements
• Airport language assistance resources and practices
• Collecting and assessing demographic data
• Reporting Title VI complaints and other required FAA notifications.
See Training Section for more information for expected training for all staff.
Among other responsibilities, the Coordinator:
• Proactively ensures that the Airport Sponsor is in compliance with nondiscrimination
requirements of Title VI and reports to Palm Springs International Airport leadership on
the status of Title VI compliances.
• Responds promptly to requests by FAA for data and records and for the scheduling of
compliance reviews and other FAA meetings to determine compliance with Title VI and
related requirements.
• Receives discrimination complaints covered by Title VI and related requirements, and
forwards them to the FAA, within 15 days of receipt, together with any actions taken to
resolve the matter.
• Provides the FAA with updates regarding its response and status of early resolution efforts
to complaints concerning Title VI and related requirements (49 CFR Part 21, Appendix
C(b)(3)), including resolution efforts.
• Annually reviews the airport's Title VI plan and disseminates information throughout staff
and the Airport Sponsor's leadership.
• Coordinates data collection to evaluate whether racial or ethnic groups are unequally
benefited or impacted by airport programs. The data will be regularly assessed and readily
available upon request (49 CFR § 21.9(b) & (c)). Data collection methods will include
optional demographic questions in: airport customer satisfaction surveys, customer
complaints, airport event sign -in sheets, and bids/proposals for airport contracts, and other
methods described in the airport Community Participation Plan (CPP).
• Maintains demographic data for members of appointed planning and advisory bodies for
the airport. Identifies any disparities compared to the community. Provides information
to the membership selecting official/committee, particularly when vacancies occur.
• Maintains a copy of 49 CFR Part 21 for inspection by any person asking for it during
normal working hours (49 CFR 21, Appendix C (b)(2)(i)). 0
L
Resolution No. 25264
Page 9
See Notice, Compliance reviews, Audits, Lawsuits, and Other Investigations, and Complaints
Sections of this Plan.
The Coordinator has requested and received access to the Title VI portion of the FAA Civil
Rights Connect System(https:i.'faa.civilrightsconnect.com).
5. Notice
49 CFR Part 21 Appendix C(b)(2)(ii)
Palm Springs International Airport will conspicuously display the FAA -provided Unlawful
Discrimination Poster in all public areas on airport property, including those with pedestrian
activity. The Coordinator ensures that these posters are visible, accessible,2 and maintained. The
poster template is available at
https::'?www.faa.,gov'about/office or &'headquarters officeslacr'com civ support/non disc pr' and a
completed copy is attached. See Section 15 Appendix.
Palm Springs International Airport has posted the above Title VI policy statement at its staff
offices.
Palm Springs International Airport will distribute this Title VI Plan among its employees and
airport contractors, concessionaires, lessees, and tenants. This plan will be distributed by
December 31, 2023, by email and hardcopy where applicable.
Posters are displayed in the terminal and other areas on airport property, including the following
public locations:
Terminal/FBO/Concessions/
Other Locations
Terminal
Bono Concourse
Agua Caliente Concourse
Baggage Claim/Rental Car Facility
Signature Flight Support Corporation
Atlantic Aviation FBO, Inc.
Clean Energy, Inc.
Outreach to Affected Communities
Quantity in
Pre -Security
Area
Quantity in
Post -Security
Area
Additional
Quantities
9
3 0
0
5 0
_
0
2 3
3
0 0
1
0 0
1
0 0
2
t
0 0
The City of Palm Springs City Clerk office ensures that notices for public meetings reach all
I For more information about website accessibility, please visit ADA.gov.
Resolution No, 25264
Page 10
segments of the impacted community. The Title VI coordinator will help to identify effective
media platforms to share announcements and notices. Announcements are made in social media,
general circulation newspapers, community newspapers, email broadcast, and the City of Palm
Springs website (www.flypsp.com). The City of Palm Springs City Clerk contacts leaders and
representatives in Affected Communities directly to confirm effective media platforms to reach
all Affected Communities and provide important feedback on translated materials. The office
maintains records of all such notices and the efforts made to reach each of the Affected
Communities.
Palm Springs International Airport will create a detailed CPP by December 1, 2023. A copy of
the plan will be available at www.flypsp.com.
To ensure that the community is effectively informed of and able to participate in public hearings,
the City of Palm Springs City Clerk office includes public notices translated into appropriate
languages, including for any language spoken by a significant number or proportion of the
Affected Community population that has limited English proficiency (LEP). Such social media
postings and notices will include directions for obtaining an interpreter, free of charge, for public
hearings. 28 CFR § 42.405(d). See Limited English Proficiency (LEP) Section.
6. Community Statistics
Title VI regulations require Federal grant recipients to know their community demographics. See
49 CFR § 21.9(b). By knowing this information, the Palm Springs International Airport will be
able to identify, understand, and engage with communities. In doing so, the Palm Springs
International Airport needs to know about communities eligible to be served, actually or
potentially affected, benefited, or burdened by Palm Springs International Airport's airport
program.
Affected Communities' Population
Palm Springs
Desert Hot Springs _
Cathedral City
Rancho Mirage _
Palm Desert
Indian Wells
44,549
32,291 _
51,900
17,057
50,911
4,832
La Quinta 7,813
Indio 2,222 _
Coachella 2,176
3 We will not subject any persons to discrimination based on race, color, national origin, age, sex, or creed. The
term "protected communities" is used within this Title VI Plan to highlight the requirements of Title VI, 49 U.S.C. §
47123, the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, and in some instances, includes low-income populations under
Executive Order 12898. 0
Resolution No. 25264
Page 11
(Hereafter, the above communities will be referred to collectively as "the Affected
Communities").
We have identified the following facts about the Affected Communities:
Low Income Communities'.
A low-income area is an identifiable group of persons living in geographic proximity, whose
median household income is at or below the Department of Health and Human Services poverty
guidelines. Pursuant to Executive Order 12898, "Federal Actions to Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low -Income Populations, Palm Springs International Airport
is collecting information about affected and potentially affected low-income communities.
According to U.S. Census Report, such as 51701: Poverty Status in the Past 12 Months, the overall
poverty level for Palm Springs is approximately 14.5%. The poverty rate remains high compared
with the rest of the Riverside County. The poverty rates for the specific Affected Communities
are as follows:
Affected Communities Poverty Rate
Palm Springs
Desert Hot Springs
Cathedral City
Rancho Mirage
Palm Desert
Indian Wells
La Quinta
Indio
Coachella
Racial and Ethnic Communities.
13.9%
21.0% -
17.3%
11.0%
12.9%
4.7%
9.5% J-
7.3 % _-
11.2%
Demographic data for race, color, and national origin was evaluated to identify racial and ethnic
communities and populations in each Affected Community. The demographic composition by
race, color, or national origin for the specific Affected Communities are as follows 6:
Affected Community: Palm Springs
Total Affected Communi Population: 44,549
Demographic Group within Affected , Number of Peopie in Percent of Total
Community i Minority Group I Affected Community
White --
32,211
72%
Black or African American
2,561
6%
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian _
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
456
i 1 %
5%
0%
2,359
108
Resolution No. 25264
Page 12
or Latino
10,491
23%
_Hispanic
More than one
4,353
10%
Some other race alone
121
0% _
White alone, not Hispanic or Latino _
27,853
62%
Affected Community: Desert Hot Springs
Total Affected Community, _ Population: 32,291
Demographic Group within Affected [umber
of People in
Percent of Total
Community I
Minority Group
Affected Community
Population
White
14,010
43%
Black or African American
3,115
10%
American Indian or Alaska Native
361
1 %
Asian
873
3%
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
27
0%
Hispanic or Latino
19,785
61 %
More than one
7,286
23%
Some other race alone
78
000
White alone, not Hispanic or Latino
8,432
26%
Affected Community: Cathedral City
Total Affected Communi
:Population: 51.900
Demographic Group within Affected
Number of People in
Percent of Total
Community
Minority Group
Affected Community
Population
_
White
25,710
46%
Black or African American
988
_
2%
American Indian or Alaska Native
1026
2%
Asian
3,590
7%
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
161
0%
Hispanic or Latino
30,498
59%
More than one
10,460
20%
Some other race alone
77
0%
White alone, not Hispanic or Latino
15,454
30%
Affected Community: Rancho Mirage
Total Affected Community Population: 17,057,
Demographic Group within Affected
Number of People in
Percent of Total
Community
Minority Group
Affected Community
Population
White
14,279
_
83%
Black or African American
268
_
1 2%
Resolution No. 25264
Page 13
r
�J-
American Indian or Alaska Native
136
1 %
Asian
849
5%
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
17
0%
Hispanic or Latino
2,001
12%
More than one
803
5%
Some other race alone
17
0%
White alone, not Hispanic or Latino
13,679
79%
Affected Community: Palm Desert
Total Affected Communi Population: 50,911
Demographic Group within Affected
Community
Number of People in
Minority Group
Percent of Total
Affected Community
Population
White
36,332
71 %
Black or African American
1,478
3%
American Indian or Alaska Native
344
1 %
Asian
2,225
4%
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
136
0%
Hispanic or Latino
12,302
24%
More than one
6,855
13%
Some other race alone
220
0%
White alone, not Hispanic or Latino
33,317
65%
Affected Community: Indian Wells
Total Affected Community Population: 4,832
Demographic Group within Affected
Community
Number of People in
Minority Group
Percent of Total
Affected Community
Population
White
4,303
89%
Black or African American
169
4%
American Indian or Alaska Native
0
0%
Asian
139
3%
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
14
0%
Hispanic or Latino
152
3%
More than one
184
4%
Some other race alone
6
0%
White alone, not Hispanic or Latino
4,236
88%
Affected Community: La Quinta
Total Affected Community Population: 37,813
Resolution No. 25264
Page 14
Demographic Group within Affected
Community
White
Black or African American
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
Hispanic or Latino
More than one
Some other race alone
White alone, not Hispanic or Latino
Number of People in Percent of Total
Minority Group Affected Community
Population
24,732
65%
2%
1%
4% _
0%
744
379
1,394
81
13,866
37%
6,107
l 6%
0%
54% °
109
20,542
Affected Community: Indio
Total Affected Communit • Population: 92,222
Demographic Group within Affected Number of People in Percent of Total
Community Minority Group Affected Community
Population
White 28,559 31 %
Black or African American 1,821 2%
American Indian or Alaska Native 538 1%
Asian 2,193 2%
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander 0 0%
Hispanic or Latino _ 66,167 _ __._ 71 %
More than one 43,587 47%
Some other race alone 0 0%
White alone, not Hispanic or Latino 21,213 1 23%
Affected Community: Coachella
Total Affected Communit • Population: 42,176
Demographic Group within Affected Number of People in
Community Minority Group
White
Black or African American
American Indian or Alaska Native
5,092
212
322
Asian
107
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
11
41,298
Hispanic or Latino
More than one
Some other race alone
15,610
50
White alone, not Hispanic or Latino
591
Percent of Total
Affected Community
Population
12%
1%
1%
0%
0%
Fi
C
98%
37%
-
_
0
0%
1%
Resolution No. 25264
Page 15
Limited English Proficiency (LEP).
The goal of all language access planning and implementation is to ensure that Palm Springs
International Airport communicates effectively with limited English proficient (LEP)
individuals. Effective language access requires self -assessment and planning. The next table lists
non-English languages' that are spoken in LEP households in the Affected Communities. The data
source is American Community Survey.
The threshold we have used for identifying the languages with significant LEP populations is the
DOT LEP Policy Guidance safe harbor threshold, which is 5% or 1,000, whichever is less.4 The
safe harbor for our community is 1,000. Please refer to the end of this document to find data for
all languages in our community.
Languages Spoken by LEP Population that Meetl Number I Margin of Error
the Safe Harbor Threshold
Spanish 1 3,716 1 +/-532
Frequency of contact with LEP individuals at the airport and airport -related activities (all
languages):
Languages Spoken by LEP
A few times a
Several times a
At least once a
Every day
Persons
year
month
week
(365 days a
(12 or less days
13 to 51 days a
(52 to 364 days
year)
a year
ear
a ear
Spanish
X
Additional languages spoken by significant numbers of LEP persons in the Affected
Communities, local schools, emergency service providers, and others, include:
Additional Languages Spoken
Tagalog (incl. Filipino)
German
French
Other Pacific Island languages
This information is updated annually' through checking the following resources:
Data Sources for Languages Spoken in Affected I Website link to Data Source
4 See the DOT LEP Policy Guidance at https://www.federaIregister.Rov/d/05-23972/p-133. The safe harbor
provisions apply to the translation of written documents only; however, it provides a consistent starting point for
identifying significant LEP populations.
5 Data should be kept up-to-date, but this plan does not need to be updated for incremental data changes during
the Plan's 3 year period.
Resolution No. 25264
Page 16
Community
U.S. Census Bureau https://data.census.gov/table?q=B 16001 &y-20
23 -0
Beneficiary Diversity.
Demographic information is collected from airport customers, attendees at community meetings,
and businesses seeking opportunities at the airport, through voluntary disclosures.
Description of Beneficiary Demographic Information Collection Methods
• The Palm Springs International Airport, Marketing & Communications Department conducts
surveys of airport guests for customer satisfaction with airport concessions, restroom cleanliness,
food offerings, and other elements and services. The survey includes a voluntary request for
demographic information.
Staff and Advisory Board Diversity.
Demographic information is collected from airport program employees and members of planning
and advisory boards, through voluntary disclosures.
Description of Employee and Advisory Board Demographic Information Collection Methods
• Employees are asked to submit voluntary confidential demographic information at time of hiring.
I
1
Resolution No. 25264
Page 17
7. Potential or Known Community Impacts
Projects or services receiving federal financial assistance have the potential to touch so many
aspects of American life. Thus, in general, no Palm Springs International Airport activity must
have a discriminatory disparate impact on the basis of race, color, national origin (including LEP),
sex (including sexual orientation and gender identity), creed, or age. This means that policies or
procedures that have a disparate impact would require a well -documented substantial legitimate
nondiscriminatory justification, summarized below. Impacts to protected communities must be
avoided or minimized to the extent possible. No project with a discriminatory impact on protected
communities will be undertaken.'
The following airport facilities are already in use or under construction and expected to be in use
within the next 3 years.
Existing Airport Facilities Affected Community Impacted by
Operation of the Facilitv
Runway 13R-31L
Runway 13L-31R
Bono Concourse
Agua Caliente Concourse
Palm Springs Air Museum
Springs, Desert Hot Springs, Cathedral
alm Springs, Desert Hot Springs, Cathedral
_ City_
Palm. Springs, Desert Hot Springs, Cathedral
alm Springs, Desert Hot Springs, Cathedral
alm Springs, Desert Hot Springs, Cathedral
The following airport facility projects (including all alternatives) are in construction or expected
to be in construction within the next 3 years:
Airport Facility Construction Projects Affected Community Impacted by
Construction of the Facility
Taxiway "W" & "A I" Rehabilitation
Airport Terminal Complex Expansion
Public Parking
Baggage Claim Expansion
In -Line Baggage Handling System Renovation
Springs, Desert Hot Springs, Cathedral
Springs, Desert Hot Springs, Cathedral
Springs, Desert Hot Springs, Cathedral
Palm Springs, Desert Hot Springs, Cathedral
Springs, Desert Hot Springs, Cathedral
We have analyzed the above existing facilities and facility construction projects for disparate
impacts based on race, color, or national origin (including LEP) in Affected Communities. The
following have disparate impacts:
Resolution No. 25264
Page 18
Facilities or Construction Projects Affected Community Impacted Impact Can Be
with Disparate Impacts Eliminated?
None
Justifications:
Facilities or Construction
Projects
None
Justification
8. Limited English Proficiency (LEP)
Executive Order 13166
In creating a Language Assistance Plan, Palm Springs International Airport will consider the
volume, proportion, or frequency of contact with LEP persons in determining the appropriate
language assistance to provide.
In Community Statistics section, we identified the following languages spoken by LEP persons
in Affected Communities:
Language
Spanish
Palm Springs International Airport also collects data for languages spoken by airport guests.6
Data sources include:
Data Sources for Languages Spoken by Airport; Website link to Data Source
Guests
None
Based on the above data, the following additional languages have been identified as likely to be
spoken by LEP airport guests:
Language
None
The Title VI Coordinator will also actively engage with community educators, community
groups, places of work, business groups, social groups, and the like to confirm that translation
and interpretation services are accurate and effective. Additionally, the Title VI Coordinator will
inform leadership and staff of the Palm Springs International Airport of the responsibility to
provide language access. We have made the following plans to provide translation services free
5 We aim to provide appropriate language assistance services to every LEP person encountered. This includes
instances when LEP statistical data for a particular language was not available beforehand, or the safe harbor
threshold for written translation was not met. 0
FM -
L
Resolution No. 25264
Page 99
of charge to ensure that individuals with LEP have access to the benefits of the airport:
Translation Services:
0 All written notices contain a statement in the identified languages, when appropriate,
of how to receive translated written materials.
• The following vendors have been identified for written translations:
Translation Vendors Languages
Professional Interpreting, LLC Over 30 languages spoken, including those identified by
Palm Springs International Airport that may need
translation assistance.
httpsa.'www.professionalinterpreting.com/service'langua es/
• Information regarding translation services can be obtained by contacting Airport
Administration or the Airport Control Center.
Location for Translation Assistance Languages
Written notices contain a statement in The notice of translation services is included in
the identified language, when identified LEP language of Spanish as a standard.
appropriate, of how to receive However, depending on specific community needs,
translated materials. information and materials can be translated through our
contracted provider.
Translation assistance through our Over 30 languages spoken, including those identified by
contracted provider is accessible by Palm Springs International Airport that may need
contact Airport Administration. translation assistance.
https:/www.professionalinterpreting.com/service/langtiagest I
Interpreta_t_ion Services:
• The following vendors have been identified for interpretation services:
Vendors
Professional Interpreting, LLC
CASL
L
Over 30 languages spoken, including those identified by
Palm Springs International Airport that may need
translation assistance.
https://www.professionalintemreting.com/service,'langua
ASL Only
Resolution No. 25264
Page 20
• Information regarding interpretation services can be obtained by contacting Airport
Administration or the Airport Control Center.
Location for Interpretation Languages
Assistance
Airport Administration See Above
Airport Control Center See Above
Description of Interpretation Assistance Processes
• Airport Administration Office and the Airport Control Center maintains a list of multilingual
employees, the languages they speak, and their associated office telephone numbers. The list
indicates whether each employee is proficient in providing interpretation and/or translation
services. The list is updated annually in the Public Information Handbook and provided to
all airport employees. Generally, these employees are available to assist members of the
public with verbal real-time interpretation, during normal business hours.
• The City of Palm Springs has contracted with Professional Interpreting, LLC to provide on -
demand telephone interpretation services to airport guests when needed. When a request for
an interpreter is received, the following process is used: Airport Administration or the Airport
Control Center first contacts a multilingual staff member who will remain with the individual
through completion. When necessary, the Airport Administration or the Airport Control
Center will contact City contracted vendors.
9. Transportation
49 Part CFR 21 Appendix C (a)(1)(ix)
In the Community Statistics section of this plan, we identified Affected Communities and
provided demographic and related data for the community populations. The minority and
disadvantaged community areas located within the Affected Communities are identified below.
Other minority and disadvantaged community areas that are near the airport but not within
Affected Communities are also identified below.
We have coordinated with Morongo Basin Transit Authority (MBTA), SunDial, Coachella Valley
Taxi, City Cab, Yellow Cab of the Desert, Uber and Lyft to encourage them to provide transit
service access between the airport and these areas.
The following chart identifies existing and planned transit services connecting the airport
employment centers with the identified minority and disadvantaged community areas.
Minority and/or Disadvantaged Transit Service Planned or Existing
Community Areas
City of Palm Springs & Surrounding Fixed -route buses — SunLine Transit Existing
Areas Agency
City of Palm Springs & Surrounding Micotransit Service - SunRide Existing
Areas
Resolution No. 25264
Page 21
City of Palm Springs & Surrounding Paratransit vans Coachella Valley Existing
Areas Taxi
10. Minority Businesses
49 CFR 21 Appendix C (a)(1)(x)
Bids for airport concessions and other business opportunities are solicited from area minority and
woman -owned businesses through the following methods:
Airport Business
Opportunity
Contract Services Agreement
and Professional Services
Agreement.
Minority Business Outreach Methods
olicitations are handled through an RFP which is consistent with
AA provision relative to minority and woman -owned
usinesses. Solicitations are automatically sent to vendors that are
.gistered with PlanetBids which is an online procurement and
idding system. Public outreach events are held and an ACDBE
onsultant is also utilized for additional outreach.
Selections are in compliance with Title VI, Part 21, and related requirements. Information on the
award process and documentation for specific bid decisions is kept with the City of Palm Springs
Procurement & Contracting Department.
11. Training
New employee orientation incorporates Title VI training. Topics include:
• Title VI and related laws prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin
(including LEP), sex (including sexual orientation and gender identity), creed, or age
• Title VI complaints must be forwarded to the Coordinator
• Protections against retaliation for filing civil rights complaints or related actions
• Title VI notices must be displayed throughout the airport public facilities
• All contracts must include Title VI clauses
• Language interpretation and translation services
• Cultural and community relations sensitivity training
• Anti -harassment training
Refresher information will be provided on an annual basis or as needed.
L
Resolution No. 25264
Page 22
12. Compliance Reviews Audits Complaints, Lawsuits and Other
Investigations 0
FAA Notification. The Coordinator will notify FAA of any pending investigations and reviews,
including:
• Compliance reviews or audits concerning civil rights requirements?
• Complaints, lawsuits, or other investigations alleging noncompliance with civil rights
requirements8
As discussed in the Title VI Complaints Section, Title VI complaints must be forwarded to FAA
contacts within 15 days of receipt. For all other civil rights investigations, Palm Springs
International Airport must notify FAA contacts of any new investigations prior to grant execution.
At regular intervals, the Coordinator will provide FAA contacts with status updates for the
investigations and reviews, until completed. For each existing investigation or review completed
within 5 years of this plan, the Coordinator will also provide a statement about the outcome, unless
previously provided.
13. Title VI Complaints
49 CFR 21.11; 49 CFR 21 Appendix C (b)(3); 28 CFR 42.406(d)
Scope. These procedures are for complaints of discrimination under Title VI and related laws
(hereafter "Title VI Complaints." In order to be a Title VI Complaint, the complaint must:
1. Allege discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin (including LEP), sex
(including sexual orientation and gender identity), creed, or age or violations administrative
requirements under Title VI or related laws.
2. Not only be for employment matters9
3. Allege misconduct by the Palm Springs International Airport, including airport employees,
contractors, concessionaires, lessees, or tenants.
4. Concerning an airport facility or actions by the Palm Springs International Airport
including airport employees, contractors, concessionaires, lessees, or tenants.
Includes any Title VI, ADA, Sec. 504, Title VII/EEO, or other civil rights program compliance review or audit to be
performed on the airport sponsor or any of its sub -recipients by any State, local or Federal agency.
Includes allegations of discrimination based on race, color, national origin (including LEP), sex (including sexual
orientation and gender identity), creed, or age, whether because of actions of the airport sponsor itself, or its
employees, contractors, or tenants. Includes noncompliance with related administrative requirements under civil
rights laws.
9 Complaints of employment discrimination must be addressed as required by EEOC and other applicable
authorities with jurisdiction over employment matters. If an Airport sponsor employment activity is supported by
FAA -provided financial assistance or it is alleged that the employment discrimination affects the broader airport
program, complaints about that activity must also be reported to FAA. 0
Resolution No. 25264
Page 23
Rights. Any person who believes that he or she has been subjected to discrimination on the basis
of race, color, national origin (including LEP), sex (including sexual orientation and gender
identity), creed, or age has the right to file a complaint with the Palm Springs International
Airport.10 Alternatively, they can file a formal complaint with an outside agency, such as the U.S.
Departments of Justice or Transportation, or the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), or seek
other legal remedies.
Receipt of Complaint. The Coordinator will log in the complaint and promptly send copies of the
complaint to the office named in the complaint, the Airport Director, the City Attorney and the
FAA (Note: FAA only requires civil rights complaints).
Complaints must be filed within 180 days of the discriminatory event, must be in writing, and must
be delivered to:
Victoria Carpenter
Airport Administration Manager
Title VI Coordinator
3400 E. Tahquitz Canyon Way, Suite 1
Palm Springs, CA 92262-6966
Phone: 760.318.3808
Email: Victoria.Carpenter@PalmSpringsCA.gov
If a complaint is initially made by phone, it must be supplemented with a written complaint before
180 days after the discriminatory event has passed. If a verbal complaint is received, the
complainant should be given a copy of the Airport Discrimination Complaint Procedures and
instructed to submit a written complaint. Accommodation will be provided upon request to
individuals unable to file a written complaint due to a disability.
Initial Procedure. The Coordinator may meet with the complainant to clarify the issues, obtain
additional information, and determine if informal resolution might be possible in lieu of an
investigation. If successfully resolved, the Coordinator will issue a closure letter to the
complainant, record the disposition in the complaints log, and report the resolution to FAA.
Discrimination Complaint Referral Procedure
Internal Complaint Referral. All Title VI complaints must be promptly forwarded to the
Coordinator within 30 days.
Initial FAA Notification. A copy of each Title VI complaint will be forwarded to the FAA within
15 days of initial receipt (not the date that the Coordinator was notified). The Coordinator will
forward a copy of the complaint and a statement describing all actions taken to resolve the matter,
and the results thereof, to the FAA Civil Rights staff. (Note: complaints based on disability do not
have to be forwarded to FAA.) To transmit complaint information to the FAA, the Coordinator
Resolution No. 25264
Page 24
will upload it to the FAA Civil Rights Connect System. The Coordinator will also seek technical
assistance from FAA, as needed, throughout complaint intake, investigation and resolution
process.
Investigation Procedure
Assignment of Investigator. The Coordinator will immediately begin the investigation or
designate an investigator.
Cooperation with FAA. The Coordinator will promptly investigate all Title VI complaints,
including those referred by the FAA for investigation. If the FAA is investigating a complaint
against the Palm Springs International Airport, the Coordinator will avoid interfering with the FAA
investigation, cooperate with the FAA when needed, and share factual information with the FAA.
Prompt Investigation. The Coordinator will make every effort to complete discrimination
complaint investigations within 60 calendar days after the complaint is received. Some
investigations may take longer with a justification for the delay and assurance that the investigation
is being completed as quickly as possible.
Contact with Complainant. The Coordinator will meet with the complainant to clarify the issues
and obtain additional information, and also speak with community members and potential
witnesses, as appropriate.
Investigation Report. After completing the investigation, the Coordinator will prepare a written
report. 0
Consultation with Legal Counsel. In each case, the Coordinator will consult with Legal Counsel
regarding the investigation and the report. Airport Legal Counsel will ensure that the report is
consistent with the DOT and FAA Title VI nondiscrimination requirements.
Prompt Resolution of Disputes. The Coordinator will emphasize voluntary compliance and
quickly and fairly resolve disputes with complainants, or with contractors, tenants, or other
persons, through an established work order process which notifies maintenance of the need to
remedy or repair. If notified of a problem or incident, individuals involved are directed to report
to the City Clerk's office. Lastly, all projects have ADA upgrades included.
Forwarding Report and Response to Complainant. At the completion of the investigation, the
complainant and respondent will receive a letter of findings and deterniination of the investigation
and any applicable resolution. The letter transmitting the findings and any applicable resolution
will state Palm Springs International Airport's conclusion regarding whether unlawful
discrimination occurred and will describe the complainant's appeal rights. A summary of the
investigation report, any appeal, or follow-up actions will be sent to the FAA via the FAA Civil
Rights Connect System.
Resolution No. 25264
Page 25
Appeal Rights. The complainant must be notified of their right to appeal the findings or
determinations, and of the procedures and requirements for an appeal:
The complainant may appeal in writing to the Airport's Executive Director.
The written appeal must be received within 60 business days after receipt of the written
decision.
The written appeal must contain all arguments, evidence, and documents supporting
the basis for the appeal.
• The Executive Director will issue a final written decision in response to the appeal.
Avoiding Future Discrimination. In addition to taking action with respect to any specific instances
of discrimination, Palm Springs International Airport will identify and implement measures to
reduce the chances of similar discrimination in the future.
Intimidation and Retaliation Prohibited. Palm Springs International Airport employees,
contractors, and tenants will not intimidate or retaliate against a person who has filed a complaint
alleging discrimination.
For information on filing a complaint with DOTIFAA, please contact Victoria Carpenter, Title VI
Coordinator.
This complaint procedure is shared with the public through the following methods:
Website, In -person, and Other Distribution Methods
1. Airport website, Title VI page at www.flyyst).com/civilrights
2. Upon request from the ADA/Title VI Coordinator at
Victoria.Carpenter .palmspringsca.gov or 760.318.3808
3. In -person, upon request, at the Palm Springs International Airport located at 3400 E.
Tahquitz Canyon Way, Suite 1, Palm Springs, CA 92262-6966
4. Via US Mail, upon request, by writing to Victoria Carpenter, ADA/Title VI
Coordinator, City of Palm Springs, Palm Springs International Airport located at 3400
E. Tahquitz Canyon Way, Suite 1, Palm Springs, CA 92262-6966
L
Resolution No. 25264
Page 26
14. Population / Language Data
Population Data
The data below is sourced from the U.S. Census Bureau's American Community Survey (Table
S 1701), Palm Springs data is sourced from ACS 5-Year Estimates Subjects Tables, 2022.
II
Resolution No. 25264
Page 27
Palm Springs, California
Percent below poverty
Total
Below poverty
level
evel
La
Estlmate
Main of
Estimate
Maorgin of
Estimate
Ma rgln of
Error
vebel
Population for whom porty status
_
is determined
44,549
3308
6,189
1758
13.9%
11.7
AGE
Under 18 years
3,661
1354
753
1262
20.6%
17.1
Under years
853
1217
252
1137
29.5%
114,1
5 to 17 years
2,808
1333
'Sol
1175
17.8%
16.6
Related children of
householder under 18 years
3,652
1353
744
3263
20.4%
17.1
18 to 64 years
26,200
1696
3,831
1521
'14.6%
i1.9
18 to 34 years
6,997
tS44
1.351
*369
19.3%
*4.9
35 to 64 years
'19,203
1634
2,480
t276
'12.9%
11.4
60 years and over
'19,695
1708
2,353
1303
11.9%
11.5
65 years and over
14,688
1695
1,605
t242
10.9%
11.5
SEX
Male
26,943
t457
3,820
t485
'24.2%
31.7
Female
17,605
t468
2,369
2422
'23.5%
12.4
RACE AND HISPANIC OR LATINO
ORIGIN
White alone
31.932
=729
3,968
1501
12.4%
11.5
Black or African American alone
2,545
3331
1,034
1435
40.6%
116.0
American Indian and Alaska
r
Native alone
451
1162
80
346
17.7%
t9.1
Asian alone
2,351
t418
158
t65
6.7%
13.2
Native Hawaiian and Other
r
Pacific Islander alone
SOS
i54
38
*35
35,2%
1251
Some ocher race alone
2,823
t504
q10
1-190
14.5%
t6.5
Two or more races
'4,339
t707
SOl
t158
11 5%
t3 7
Hispanic or Latino origln (of any
r
r
ce)
10.409
2793
1,4S8
t424
14.0%
13.9
White alone, not Hispanic or
I •tlno
27,•.84
t809
3,307
t372
12.0%
t1.3
EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT
Population 25 years and over
30,272
1581
4,687
t440
12.2%
31.2
Less than high school graduate
2,770
t385
554
t141
20.0%
15.1
High school graduate (includes
r
r
equivalency)
6,45S
t517
1,163
t188
18.0%
32.9
Some college, associate's
I'll,ree
22,269
1523
1,553
t275
12.8%
12.3
Bachelor's degree or higher
16,878
t644
1,417
t224
8.4%
11.3
EMPLOYMENT STATUS
Civilian labor force 16 years and
over
20.879
1S71
1,292
1245
6.2%
*1.1
Employed
19,080
t568
943
1192
4.4%
11.0
Male
11,949
t488
522
1123
4.4%
11-0
Female
7,131
t422
321
1145
415%
11-9
Unemployed
1,799
t297
449
1151
25 O%
16.5
Male
1,094
t221
306
1145
28 0%
110.2
Female
705
1159
143
155
20. 3%
17 6
WORK EXPERIENCE
Population 16 years and over
41,391
1379
5,552
t617
13.4%
21.5
Worked full-time, year-round
in the past 12 months
12,570
t585
240
143
1.1%
t0.3
Worked part-time or part year
In the past 12 months
8,965
t571
996
3201
11.196
12.1
Old not work
19,856
t696
4.416
1606
22-256
12.8
ALL INDIVIDUALS WITH INCOME
BELOW THE FOLLOWING
POVERTY RATIOS
50 percent of poverty level
3,819
t619
(X)
(X)
(X)
(X)
125 percent of poverty level
8,063
t817
(X)
(X)
(X)
(X)
150 percent of poverty level
30,193
1945
(X)
(X)
(X)
(X)
185 percent of poverty level
13,189
11,031
(X)
(X)
(X)
(X)
200 percent of poverty level
14,S88
1990
(X)
(X)
(X)
(X)
300 percent of poverty level
20,720
3877
(X)
(X)
(X)
(X)
400 percent of poverty level
25,998
3804
(X)
(X)
(X)
(X)
500 percent of poverty level
29,169
t789
(X)
(X)
(X)
(X)
UNRELATED INDIVIDUALS FOR
WHOM POVERTY STATUS IS
DETERMINED
18,625
t793
3,804
t458
20.4%
t2.1
Male
12,843
i621
2.637
t396
20.5%
t2-7
Female
5.782
t422
1,167
t217
20.2%
23,2
15 year♦
0
x28
0
t28
•'
16 to 17 years
9
110
9
110
100.0%
t100.0
18 to 24 years
653
1295
282
1192
43.296
t19.7
25 to 34 years
2,046
1361
418
3198
20.4%
t8-7
35 to 44 years
1,153
1183
234
395
20.3%
16.7
45 to 54 years
2,730
1366
489
3116
17 9%
t4.2
55 to 64 years
4,716
1397
1,076
t175
22 8%
13.6
65 to 74 years
4,035
1357
715
t135
17.7%
t2.8
75 years and over
3,283
1346
581
3175
17 7%
14 G
Mean Income deficit for unrelated
individuals (dollars)
8,763
1516
(X)
(X)
M
(X)
Worked full-time, year-round in
the past 12 months
5,716
d463
80
t36
1.4%
t0.6
Worked less than full time, year-
round in the past 12 months
3,862
t329
778
*177
20.1%
14.0
Did not work
9,047
t544
2,946
1-427
32 6%
13.9
Population in housing units for
whom poverty status is
determined
44,190
t107
5,947
t744
11.5%
91 7
Resolution No. 25264
Page 28
Desert Hot Springs, California
Total
Below poverty
level
Percent below
poverty level
T Margin of
Margin of
Margin of
Label
Estimate
I Error
Estimate
Error
Estimate
Error
Population for whom poverty status
Is determined
32,291
t96
6,774
31,363
21.0%
t4.2
AGE
Under 18 years
8,465
1747
2,395
3941
28.3%
19.0
Under S years
2,445
t640
673
3348
27.5%
112.9
5 to 17 years
6,020
1677
1,722
3626
28.6%
t9.3
Related children of
I
householder under 18 years
8,434
1746
2,364
t834
28.0%
19.0
18 to 64 years
19.811
t813
3,630
36B3
18.3%
13.6
18 to 34 years
7.917
1761
1,379
3399
�17.4%
15.2
35 to 64 years
11,894
1790
2,252
t486
18.9%
t3.9
60 years and over
6,509
1666
1,412
t368
21.7%
t5.5
65 years and over
4,01S
2468
749
1241
16.7%
15.9
SEX
Male
1S,747
3770
3,006
1616
�19.1%
13.8
Female
16,544
3761
3,768
1941
22.8%
15.5
RACE AND HISPANIC OR LATINO
ORIGIN
White alone
13,945
31,677
2,576
1979
'IS 5%
16.5
Black or African American alone
3,115
3966
987
1476
31 7%
116.7
Amerlcan Indian and Alaska
I
,
Native alone
361
t259
239
1261
66.2%
t30.9
Asian alone
873
t395
131
1117
15,0%
t12.9
Native Hawaiian and Other
Pacific Islander alone
27
136
O
128
O.O%
t63.3
Some other race alone
6,684
31,284
1.824
3S75
27.3%
t7.7
Two or more races
7,286
31,499
1.017
1503
14.0%
t6.5
Hispanic or Latino origin (of any
race)
19,755
11,147
4.189
11,040
21.2%
15 2
White alone, not Hispanic or
Latino
7,850
1971
1.342
t491
17. 1%
15 B
EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT
Population 2S years and over
20,198
3821
3.728
±696
18.5%
13 5
Less than high school graduate
3,913
tS81
1,200
t359
30.7%
t7,9
High school graduate (includes
eclulvale ncy)
6,756
1742
1,213
1351
18.096
15.3
Some college, associate's
degree
6,554
1629
898
1253
13. 7%
13 8
Bac heior's degree or higher
2,97S
1606
417
1192
14.096
16.5
EMPLOYMENT STATUS
Civilian labor force 16 years and
over
15,408
t11015
1,611
1404
10.5%
22 9
Employed
14,268
±996
1,214
1372
8 5%
12 8
Male
7,440
t731
488
1227
6 6%
12 9
Female
6,828
t716
726
1270
10.6%
14.2
Unemployed
1,140
t340
397
t178
34.8%
212.6
Male
527
t185
129
174
24.5%
214 5
Female
613
1230
268
1162
43.7%
217.5
WORK EXPERIENCE
Populat Ion 16 years and over
24,923
1878
4.653
3854
18.7%
33.5
Worked full-time, year round
In the past 12 months
9,909
1782
561
2245
5.7%
32.6
Worked part-time or part year
in the past 12 months
5,249
1773
788
3250
15 0%
tS.3
Did not work
9,765
1858
3,304
1678
33.8%
t5.6
ALL INDIVIDUALS WITH INCOME
BELOW THE FOLLOWING
POVERTY RATIOS
50 percent of poverty level
2,989
tB29
(xy
(x)
(x)
(X)
125 percent of poverty level
8,257
t1,395
(x)
(x)
(x)
(X)
150 percent of poverty level
10,230
31,577
(X)
(x)
(x)
(X)
185 percent of poverty level
13,517
11,642
(X)
(XI
(X}
(X)
200 percent of poverty level
14,668
31,517
{X)
(X)
(X)
(X)
300 percent of poverty level
22,636
11,718
(X)
(X)
(X}
(X)
400 percent of poverty level
26,868
t1, 228
(X)
(X)
(X}
(X)
Soo percent of poverty level
29,204
3831
(X)
(X)
(X)
(X)
UNRELATED INDIVIDUALS FOR
WHOM POVERTY STATUS IS
DETERMINED
6,451
±785
2,027
1497
314%
16.3
Male
3,501
3S47
959
3349
27.4%
18.4
Female
2,950
3499
1,068
t311
36 2%
i8.9
15 years
O
328
O
t28
-
•'
16 to 17 years
31
3S1
31
351
100.0%
359.1
19 to 24 years
444
t226
ISO
t120
40.5%
*20.7
25 to 34 years
1,017
t307
297
1187
29.2%
126.7
35 to 44 years
879
3268
358
1175
40.7%
314.0
45 to 54 years
737
1234
130
t81
17.6%
t10.7
SS to 64 years
1,666
1359
601
3243
36.1%
312.1
65 to 74 years
1,099
1253
322
t153
29. 3%
t11.1
75 years and over
57B
1185
108
170
18.7%
t11.4
Mean income deficit for unrelated
individuals (dollars)
8,045
1963
(X)
(X)
(X)
(X)
Worked full-time, year round in
the past 12 months
2,516
1572
ISO
t194
7.2%
37.4
Worked less than full time, year
round In the past 12 months
1,131
1248
267
*136
23.6%
111.5
O-d not work
2,804
1461
1,580
3404
56.3%
18.4
Population In housing units for
whom poverty status is
determined
32,062
1104
6,638
31,349
20.7%
t4.2
Resolution No. 25264
Page 29
fl
L
Cathedral City, California
Total Below poverty level Percent below poverty level
Label
Estimate
Margin of
Es[Ima[e
Margin of
Estimate
Margin of
Error
Error
Error
vapuianon Tor wnom poverty status
I. determined
51.900
*68
8,978
21,292
17.3%
*2.5
AGE
Under 18 years
10,4B5
1809
2,740
1800
26.1%
26.5
Under 5 years
2,577
*367
S78
±211
22.4%
27.5
5 to 17 years
7,908
t756
2,162
±740
27.3%
*7.8
Related children of
householder under 1B years
10,435
±812
i,718
±BOO
26.0%
*6.5
18 to 64 years
32,134
±880
4,658
±609
14 5%
*1.9
18 to 34 years
11,392
*831
1,618
±316
14 2%
*2.6
35 to 64 years
20,742
*844
3,040
±472
14 7%
*22
60 years and over
13,220
±835
2,100
±287
15.9%
121
65 years and over
9.281
±598
1,580
±238
17.0%
32,4
SEX
Male
26.783
±732
4,068
1601
15.2%
22,3
Female
25,117
±731
4,910
±884
19.5%
*3.3
RACE AND HISPANIC OR LATINO
ORIGIN
White alone
25,660
21,716
4,244
t996
16.5%
13.5
Black or African American alone
982
±298
305
±209
31.1%
±16.7
American Indian and Alaska
Native alone
1.026
±390
265
±185
25.8%
*156
Asian alone
3.590
±670
322
±180
9.0%
*4.8
Native Hawaiian and Other
Pacific Islander alone
161
±129
10
±1S
6.2%
2128
Some other race alone
10,021
±1,619
2,300
±756
23.0%
26.5
Two or more races
10,460
±1,037
1.532
±637
14.696
15.8
Hispanic or Latino origin (of any
race)
30,617
21,244
6,415
±11292
21.0%
13 9
White alone, not Hispanic or
Latino
15,404
31,024
1,779
L266
11.5%
*1-7
EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT
Population 25 years and over
36,633
±664
5,502
1-628
15.0%
*1 8
Less than high school graduate
7.084
±614
1,883
*3S0
26.6%
25 O
High school graduate (includes
equivalency)
10,291
±639
1,858
±337
18.1%
s3.1
Some college, associate's
degree
9,741
1-736
1,104
±223
11.3%
*2.2
Bachelor's degree or higher
9,517
±818
657
±152
6.9%
*1.6
EMPLOYMENT STATUS
Civilian labor force 16 years and
over
25,424
*916
2,233
±389
8.8%
*16
Employed
23,857
*887
1,925
*366
8.1%
11.6
Male
13,466
*681
1,068
*260
7.9%
12.0
Female
10,391
±621
857
1243
B 2%
22.2
Unemployed
1,567
±360
308
t130
19.7%
28.5
Male
902
2261
135
±68
15.0%
*8.0
Female
665
2225
173
±102
26.0%
*13.6
WORK EXPERIENCE
Population 16 years and over
42,832
±759
6,416
±697
15 O%
*1.7
Worked full-time, year-round
I
r
in the past 12 months
15,785
1790
663
2179
4 2%
112
Worked part-time or part -year
,
I
r
in the past 12 months
20.158
±761
1,536
*344
15.1%
13.4
Did not work
16,889
t732
4,217
±493
2S O%
12.9
ALL INDIVIDUALS WITH INCOME
BELOW THE FOLLOWING
POVERTY RATIOS
50 percent of poverty level
2,971
*548
(X)
(X)
(X)
(X)
225 percent of poverty level
11,859
21,498
(X)
(X)
(X)
(X)
150 percent of poverty level
13,746
*1,569
(X)
(X)
(X)
(X)
185 percent of pave rty level
18,259
*1,653
(X)
(X)
(X)
(X)
2005 percent of poverty level
19.521
*1,659
(X)
(X)
(X)
(X)
300 percent of poverty level
30,577
*1,504
(X)
(X)
(X)
(X)
400 percent of poverty level
36,645
*1,276
(X)
(X)
(X)
(X)
500 percent of poverty level
41,122
*1,021
W
(X)
,X)
(X)
UNRELATED INDIVIDUALS FOR
WHOM POVERTY STATUS IS
DETERMINED
10,500
±662
3,028
*307
28.8%
*2.8
Male
6,257
±565
1,465
1232
23.4%
±3.5
Female
4,243
*367
1,563
*262
36,896
±4.8
15 years
O
*31
10
131
16 to 17 years
22
*38
22
138
100. 0%
170.1
18 to 24 years
535
*174
345
*134
64.5%
Lis 8
25 to 34 years
1,342
*329
271
*119
20.2%
±8.7
35 to 44 years
935
*22S
440
*266
47.1%
1-12.2
45 to 54 years
1, 218
*270
280
*112
23.0%
27.5
5S to 64 years
2,432
1380
547
*163
22.5%
*S.S
65 to 74 years
2,208
1274
590
*138
26.7%
*S.4
75 years and over
'1,808
*256
533
t1s3
29.5%
±6.7
Mean Income deficit for unrelated
'
Individuals (dollars)
7,656
*711
(X)
(X)
(X)
(X)
Worked full-time, year-round in
I
the past 12 months
2.831
t349
123
*87
4.a%
±3.0
Worked less than full time, year
I
round in the past 12 months
2,380
*434
620
*178
26.1%
27.8
Did not work
5,289
*465
2,285
*287
43.2%
±4.3
Population In housing units for
r
whom poverty status is
determined
51,433
±70
R,6i2
11.717
16.9%
z2 5
Resolution No. 25264
Page 30
Rancho Mirage, California
Total
Label Estimate I
Margin of
Population for whom poverty status
is determined
27,057
AGE
Under 18 years
1,490
Under 5 years
300
5 to 17 years
1,190
Related children of
householder under 18 years
1,490
18 to 64 years
7,151
18 to 34 years
1,285
35 to 64 years
5,866
60 years and over
10,232
65 years and over
9,416
SEX
Male
8,970
Female
8,087
RACE AND HISPANIC OR LATI NO
ORIGIN
White alone
14,117
Black or African American alone
255
American Indian and Alaska
Native alone
135
Asian alone
848
Native Hawaiian and Other
Pacific Islander alone
17
Some other race alone
882
Two or more races
803
Hispanic or Latino origin (of any
race)
1,993
W hIte alone, not Hispanic or
Latino
13,517
EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT
Population 25 years and over
15,198
Less than high school graduate
907
High school graduate (includes
equivalency)
2,412
Some college, associate's
degree
4,767
Bachelor's degree or higher
7,112
EMPLOYMENT STATUS
Civilian labor force 16 years and
over
6,523
Employed
5,835
Male
3,546
Female
2,289
Unemployed
689
Male
322
Female
366
WORK EXPERIENCE
Population 16 years and over
25,828
Worked full time, year round
in the past 12 ma nt hs
3,520
Worked part time or partyear
in the past 12 months
3,449
Did not work
8,859
ALL INDIVIDUALS WITH INCOME
BELOW THE FOLLOWING
POVERTY RATIOS
50 percent of poverty level
1.155
225 percent of poverty level
2,000
250 percent of poverty level
2,535
185 percent of poverty level
3,278
200 percent c, poverty level
3, 584
300 percent of poverty level
4,960
400 percent of poverty level
6,238
500 percent of poverty level
7,952
UNRELATED INDIVIDUALS FOR
I
WHOM POVERTY STATUS IS
DETERMINED
5,047
Male
2,612
Female
2,435
15 years
O
16 to 17 years
10
18 to 24 years
57
2S to 34 years
431
35 to 44 years
268
45 to 54 years
355
55 to 64 years
803
65 to 74 years
1,251
75 years and over
1,882
Mean income deficit for unrelated �
individuals (dollars)
8,156
Worked full time, year round in
the past 12 months
1,194
Worked less than full time, year-
round in the past 12 months
990
Did not work
2,863
Population In housing units for
whom poverty status is
determined
17,035
Error
±48
±292
±119
±299
±292
±482
±359
±490
±584
±540
±376
±376
Below poverty level
Estimate I Margin of
Error
1,878
1632
324
*206
78
161
246
1194
324
±206
1.070
±457
216
t143
8S4
t420
690
1173
484
*136
964
1426
914
±280
Percent below poverty level
Estimate T Margin of
11.0%
21.7%
26.0%
20 7%
21.7%
11.0%
16-8%
24.6%
6.7%
5.8%
10 7%
11.3%
±3.7
113.1
±18 5
±15 1
34 6
±3.4
±505
1140!
±612
10.0%
14.3
±177
22
±36
8.6%
115.8
±86
13
±20
9.6%
±15 5
±246
36
±33
4.2%
14.1
115
0
-21
0.0%
t79.8
±375
351
±212
39.8%
*21.7
3304
51
±45
6.4%
±6.4
±462
494
1249
24.9%
t11 0
±528
1,273
1573
9.4%
14 2
1322
1,503
±451
9.9%
t3.0
±260
243
Y12S
26.8%
113.1
1382
231
±77
9.6%
13.A
±506
5BO
±401
12.2%
±7 8
±526
449
±190
6 3%
12 7
±530
717
±434
11.0%
16 -2
±483
460
±285
7-9%
±4.7
±434
351
±281
9 9%
±7. 2
±278
109
±63
4 8%
±2 8
1266
257
±182
374%
±20.2
±140
84
±44
26.1%
±16.4
±224
173
±177
47.3%
±31.1
±267
1,592
±471
10.1%
±3 O
±404
39
±36
1 1%
t1 0
±477
664
±420
19 3%
±10.7
1620
889
±196
10.01y.
±2 2
±570
(X)
(X)
IX)
IX)
±634
(X)
(X)
(X)
(X)
3641
(X)
IX)
(X)
IX)
±665
(X)
IX)
(X)
IX)
1666
(X)
(X)
IX)
(X)
t707
(X)
IX)
IX)
(X)
±670
(X)
IX)
IX)
(X)
±649
(X)
(X)
(X)
(X)
±658
711
±212
14. 1%
±3 9
±S40
340
t189
13 0%
16 O
1385
371
t11%
e15.2%
15.2
121
0
121
-
••
321
10
321
••
±55
1
t2
'1.8%
15 0
±326
87
*86
20 2%
19.3
t124
61
194
22 8%
135 9
t135
81
162
22.8%
±154
1:244
177
170
22.0%
26.6
1249
145
±69
"11.6%
±5.4
±380
159
±76
8.4%
±4.2
t1,141
(X)
IX)
(X)
(X)
±354
18
i
±21
2.5%
11.8
±266
237
±188
23 9%
±17 8
1440
456
1139
"15.9%
±4.9
±50
1,870
T632
11.G%
±3.7
I]
0
r
L
Resolution No. 25264
Page 31
Palm Desert, California
Total
Label Estimate Margin of
Population for whom poverty status
Is determined
50,911
AGE
Under 18 years
7,254
Under 5 years
1,557
5 to 17 years
15,697
Related children of
householder under 18 years
7,206
18 to 64 years
2S,392
18 to 34 years
8,237
3S to 64 years
17,155
60 years and over
22.599
65 years and over
18,265
SEX
Male
23,922
remale
26,989
RACE AND HISPANIC OR LATINO
ORIGIN
White alone
36,048
Black or African American alone
1.440
American Indian and Ala%ka
r
Native alone
344
Asian alone
2,213
Native Hawaiian and Other
Pacific Islander alone
136
Some other race alone
3,878
Two or more races
6,852
Hispanic or Latino origin (of any
race)
12,212
White alone, not Hispanic or
Latino
33,070
EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT
Population 25 years and over
40,490
Less than high school graduate
2,829
High school graduate ('Includes
equivalency)
7,100
Some college, associate's
degree
24,331
Bachelor's degree or higher
16,230
EMPLOYMENT STATUS
Civilian labor force 16 years and
o
21,984
Employed
20,564
Male
10.891
Female
9,673
Unemployed
1,420
Male
751
Female
669
WORK EXPERIENCE
Population 16 years and over
44,400
Worked full-time, year-round
In the past 12 months
13,722
Worked part time or part year
in the past 12 months
9.241
Did not work
21,437
ALL INDIVIDUALS WITH INCOME
BELOW THE FOLLOWING
POVERTY RATIOS
50 percent of poverty level
3.189
125 percent of poverty level
8,469
ISOpercent of poverty level
10,102
185 percent of poverty level
12,649
200 percent of poverty level
13,632
300 percent of poverty level
21,556
40O percent of poverty level
27,339
Soo percent of poverty level
32,249
UNRELATED INDIVIDUALS FOR
WHOM POVERTY STATUS IS
DETERMINED
13,69S
Male
6.150
Female
7,S45
15 years
O
16 to 17 years
25
18 to 24 years
633
25 to 34 year•
1,943
35 to 44 years
1,394
45 to 54 years
882
55 to 64 years
2,211
*5 to 74 years
2,906
75 years and over
3.701
Mean income deficit for unrelated
individuals (dollars)
7,572
Worked full-time, year-round in
the past 12 months
4,028
Worked less than full-time, year
round in the past 12 months
2,766
Did not work
6,901
Population In housing ..it. for
whom poverty status is
determined
50,802
276
*719
*388
2672
1724
t1,199
* 1,030
1774
11,222
*1.195
t844
2845
Below poverty level
Estimate
Margino f
Error
6,586
11,057
1,477
t449
36B
t207
1.109
t382
1.429 t445
3,203 2521
Sl6 2289
2, 387 1434
2,363 t492
1,906 t410
2,733 2558
3,853 t723
Percent below poverty level
Margin of
Estimate
E r�or
12 9%
22.1
20.4%
15.6
23.6%
110.8
19 5%
*6.4
19.8%
25.6
12.6%
*2,1
9.9%
13.5
13 9%
22 4
10 5%
S3.9
10 4%
12.1
11.4%
t2.3
14 3%
22.5
21,783
r3,864
3633
10. 7%
21.7
2491
208
32S7
14.4%
t15.8
t277
0
231
0.0%
ill O
2482
266
*216
12.0%
38.9
1105
63
t89
46.3%
344 6
2813
610
2327
15.7%
17.8
21.569
1,57S
1628
23.0%
19.2
*1,574
2,403
2683
19."
t5.6
21,783
3.106
2502
9.4%
31.4
1999
:s,692
2739
11,6%
31.8
2407
i.44
1250
22.8%
t8.2
*641
1,254
*379
17.7%
35.2
2813
1,418
2379
9.9%
t2.4
1860
1.376
*336
8.596
t2.0
21,279
1.519
1388
6,9%
t1 8
21,287
1,132
*360
5.5%
t1.7
*1,046
432
2180
4.0%
11.6
*775
700
2318
7.2%
t3 1
*283
387
2172
27.3%
19 8
2207
145
1113
19.3%
t13.O
1191
242
2139
36.2%
214 5
*730
5,241
1773
11.8%
tl 7
1941
338
t193
2 5%
t14
2870
1,OB2
t319
11.7%
t3 5
21.288
1,321
2640
17.8%
t2 6
2524
(X)
(X)
(X)
(X)
21,205
(X)
(X)
(X)
(X)
11,233
(X)
(X)
(X)
(X)
21,351
(X)
(X)
(x)
(X)
11,309
(X)
(X)
(X)
(X)
11,388
(X)
(X)
(X)
(X)
*1,462
(X)
(X
*1,423
(X)
(X)(X)
(X)(X)
(X))
*1,063
2,841
t462
20.7%
t3 2
*757
1,107
2276
16.0%
t4.1
1698
1,734
t395
23.0%
t4 4
*31
O
13l
*41
25
141
100.0%
t65.8
1250
249
2261
39.3%
t19.3
2542
209
2148
10.891.
t7-7
2329
170
2178
26 5%
t9 8
*231
232
*137
26.3%
t12.5
*358
572
t173
25.9%
160
2403
437
2161
15 O%
15 1
t554
747
*271
20.2%
t6.0
t927
(X)
(X)
(X)
(X)
t527
150
2145
3.7%
23.6
x465
'.40
*182
19.596
25.7
t774
2,151
2435
31-2%
24 9
376
6,S22
*1,063
12.8%
12 1
Resolution No. 25264
Page 32
Indian Wells, California
Total
F
Label
Estimate
Population for whom poverty status
Is determined
4,832
AGE
Under 18 years
286
Under 5 yea rs
80
5 to 17 years
206
Related chlldre. of
householder under 18 years
286
IS to 64 years
1,775
18 to 34 years
262
35 to 64 years
1,513
60 years and over
3,283
65 years and over
2,772
SEX
Male
2,345
Femalr
2,487
RACE AND HISPANIC OR LATINO
ORIGIN
White alone
4,303
Black or African American alone
169
American Indian and Alaska
Native alone
O
Asian alone
139
Native Hawaiian and Other
Pacific Islander alone
14
Some other race alone
23
Two or more races
184
Hispanic or Latino origin (of any
race)
152
White alone, not Hispanic or
Latino
4,236
EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT
Populat Ion 25 years and over
4,499
Less than high school graduate
97
High school graduate (Includes
equivalency)
641
Some college, associate's
degree
1,194
Bachelor's degree or higher
2,567
EMPLOYMENT STATUS
Civilian labor force 16 years and
over
1748
Employed
1,637
Male
968
Fe ma le
669
U nemployrd
111
Male
39
Female
72
WORK EXPERIENCE
Population 16 years and over
4,565
Worked full-time, year-round
•
in thr past 12 months
1,071
Worked part-time or part -year
In the past 12 months
902
Did not work
2,592
ALL INDIVIDUALS WITH INCOME
BELOW THE FOLLOWING
POVERTY RATIOS
50 percent of poverty level
117
125 percent of poverty level
343
150 percent of poverty level
436
185 percent of poverty level
559
200 percent of poverty level
753
300 percent of poverty level
1,023
400 percent of poverty level
1,449
SOO percent of poverty level
♦2,003
UNRELATED INFOR
WHOM POVERTY STATUS 15
DETERMINED
1,368
Male
56B
Female
SOO
15 years
0
16 to 17 years
9
18 to 24 years
O
25 to 34 years
32
3S to 44 years
O
45 to 54 years
•33
55 to 64 years
499
65 to 74 years
2Is1
75 years and over
543
Mean Income deficit for unrelated
Individuals (dollars)
8,646
Worked fult-time, year-round In
the past 12 months
432
Worked less than full-time, year
round in the past 12 months
169
Did not work
767
Population In housing units for
whom poverty status is
determined
4,322
Margin of
Error
130
1144
164
199
1144
1365
±159
1387
1436
1389
1123
*120
Below poverty level
Estimate 1 Margin of
Error
229 183
0 113
O 113
0 113
O 113
106 163
12 119
94 156
169 182
123 161
114 160
115 147
Percent below poverty level
ate Margin of
i Error
Estim
4.7%
11-7
0.0%
113.0
0.0%
136.7
0.0%
117.6
0.0%
113.0
6 0%
13.8
4.6%
17.8
6.2%
14.0
S.1%
12.2
4.4%
12.0
4.9%
12.5
4.6%
11.9
-t285
213
179
% O%
11.8
1230
O
113
O O%
120.9
113
0
113
3131
13
121
9.4%
121.1
±23
O
113
0.0%
±87.9
126
3
16
13.0%
130.8
1137
O
113
0.0%
119.4
163
27
134
17.8%
121 2
1279
189
161
4 5%
11 9
1167
21?
183
4.a%
118
174
O
113
0.0%
132 4
1250
26
127
4.1%
14 9
1233
91
147
7.6%
t3.8
1361
100
i57
3 996
121
1376
28
130
1.696
11.8
1387
16
*24
1 O%
11.5
1200
16
±24
1 7%
12 5
1217
O
t13
0096
i5 8
163
12
119
10.8%
118.1
132
12
±19
30.8%
145.7
148
0
±13
O O%
138.8
1149
229
t83
; 0%
11 e
1419
16
124
1.5%
12.4
1190
21
133
2.396
13 7
1365
192
177
7.4%
12 8
162
(X)
(X)
(X)
(X)
3112
(X)
(X)
(X)
(X)
1122
(X)
(X)
(X)
(X)
1150
(X)
(X)
(X)
(X)
1268
(X)
(X)
(X)
(X)
±307
IX)
(X)
(X)
(X)
±356
IX)
(X)
(X)
(X)
-t316
(X)
(X)
(X)
(X)
1418
136
167
9.9%
15.5
3241
64
151
11 3%
38.7
i214
72
143
9 0%
16 1
±13
O
113
-
±13
•O
113
-
313
•O
113
137
d
113
•0.096
158 2
113
O
113
135
22
130
•66.7%
152.9
1433
26
125
5.2%
19 5
180
40
128
15, 3%
110.6
1159
48
142
8.8%
17.5
12,281
IX)
(X)
(X)
(X)
3446
0
213
O.O%
18 8
189
0
*13
0.0%
120-q
1175
136
167
117 794
17 7
129
221
*83
4 6%
31.7
I
0
Resolution No. 25264
Page 33
La Quinta, California
Total
Below poverty
level
P¢rcent below
poverty level
Label
Estimate
Margin of
Estimate
Margin of
Estimate
Margin of
Err_____
Error
Err
Population for whom poverty status
_
is determined
37,813
t80
3,608
t764
9.5%
*2.0
AGE
Under 18 years
6,830
L740
936
3457
13.7%
16.6
Under S years
1.593
Y336
171
t137
10.7%
t8.5
5 to 17 years
5,237
*641
765
Y367
14.6%
*7.0
Related children of
householder under 18 years
6,738
Y739
844
*442
12.5%
t6.4
18 to 64 Year
19.565
t680
1,845
t415
9.4%
22.1
1S to 34 years
16,739
t928
946
t338
24.0%
*4.6
3S to 64 years
♦12,826
Y747
899
±246
7.0%
*1.9
60 years and over
14,525
21,095
1,050
t267
7.2%
*1.8
65 years and over
11,41E
*969
S27
t232
7.2%
*2.0
SEX
Male
r19,673
t638
1,484
1419
7.59/6
12.1
Female
18,140
1645
2,124
Y475
11.7%
*2.5
RACE AND HISPANIC OR LATI NO
ORIGIN
White alone
24,702
*1,368
1,804
t437
7.3%
t1.7
Black or African American alone
744
*332
175
1134
♦23.5%
*172
American Indian and Alaska
Native alone
379
*270
13
*22
3.4%
t7.0
Asian alone
1,376
*414
200
1169
14.59-.
39.8
Native Hawaiian and Other
c
Pacific Islander alone
81
*66
O
t28
OA%
*36.4
Some other race alone
0,424
*1,205
629
t397
♦14,2%
t7 1
Two or more races
6, 107
*1,139
78-1
t523
♦12 9%
t8 3
Hispanic or Latino origin (of any
'
race)
13.784
*1,394
1,804
*6S9
13.1%
t4.5
White alone, not Hispanic or
Latino
20.522
*1,338
1, 306
Y302
6.4%
*1.5
EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT
Population 25 years and over
28,256
*1,170
2,322
t449
8 2%
*1.6
Less than high school graduate
2,043
*353
200
3111
9.8%
*S.4
High school graduate (includes
r
equivalency)
6,299
*672
695
*244
11.0%
*3.9
Some college, assoc.ate's
degree
9,057
*901
1.006
*331
22.1%
*3.4
Bachelor s degree or higher
10,857
Y769
421
*171
3.9%
*1.6
EMPLOYMENT STATUS
Civilian labor force 16 years and
over
16,632
t8S3
1,048
*304
6.3%
*1,a
Employed
15,286
Y961
570
t191
3 7%
11.2
Male
8,659
+606
210
Y102
2 4%
*1.2
Female
6,627
t554
360
t170
5-4%
*2.5
Unemployed
1,346
t371
478
1-266
35.5%
*25.8
Male
S47
*249
127
294
23.2%
*26.5
Female
799
*285
3S1
*244
43.9%
*19.4
WORK EXPERIENCE
Population 16 years and over
32,040
t670
2,805
t516
8.8%
*1-6
Worked full-time, year round
in the past 12 months
10,537
t857
89
t85
0.8%
*0.8
Worked part time or part -year
in the past 12 months
6,846
*706
759
t274
11 1%
14.0
Did not work
14,657
tB06
1,957
*434
13.4%
f2 9
ALL INDIVIDUALS WITH INCOME
BELOW THE FOLLOWING
POVERTY RATIOS
50 percent of poverty level
1,449
t421
(X)
(X)
(X)
(X)
125 percent of poverty level
6,287
31,575
(X)
(X)
W
(X)
150 percent of poverty level
6,780
31, 592
(x)
(X)
(X)
(X)
185 percent of poverty level
8,353
*1,552
(X)
(X)
(X)
(X)
200 percent of poverty level
9,634
21,648
(X)
(X)
(X)
IX}
300 percent of poverty level
13.635
31.560
(X)
(X)
(X)
(X)
400 percent of poverty level
18,507
311306
(X)
IX)
(X)
(X)
SOO percent of poverty level
22,233
t1.328
(X)
(X)
(X)
(X)
UNRELATED INDIVIDUALS FOR
WHOM POVERTY STATUS IS
DETERMINED
7,000
3854
1,369
*338
19.696
*4.8
Male
3245
1520
S14
*207
15.8%
*60
Female
3.,755
3603
855
Y288
22-8%
*7.3
15 years
0
*28
0
t28
••
16 to 17 years
92
1-89
92
t89
100.096
*33.6
18 to 24 years
338
1-161
198
t122
58.6%
Y23.4
25 to 34 years
1,131
t440
302
*236
26 7%
316.3
35 to 44 years
612
*2SO
74
*83
22.1%
t12.8
45 to 54 years
746
Y236
95
L62
12.7%
38.0
55 to 64 years
981
t263
266
tlos
16.9%
39.8
65 to 74 years
75 years and over
1,781
1,319
t498
t321
239
203
t103
t109
13.4%
15.4%
*S.3
18.1
Mean income de flc it for unre ated
Individuals (dollars)
7,954
*1,215
IX)
(x)
(X)
(X)
Worked full time, year round in
the past 12 months
2,424
t511
0
*28
O.O%
*1.6
Worked less than full-time, year-
round in the past 12 months
1,238
t364
437
t242
35.3%
*24.6
Did not work
3,338
t617
932
1246
27.9%
*6.4
Population in housing units for
whom poverty status Is
determined
37,751
t83
3,567
*766
9.496
22.O
Resolution No. 25264
Page 34
Indio, California
Total
Label
I Estimate
Population for whom poverty status
is determined
92,222
AGE
Under 1S years
20.794
Under 5 years
4,130
5 to 17 years
16,664
Related children of
householder under 18 years
20,794
1S to 64 years
51.871
18 to 34 years
21,113
35 to 64 years
30,758
60 years and over
23,728
65 years and over
29,557
SEX
Male
42,728
Female
49,494
RACE AND HISPANIC OR LATINO
ORIGIN
White alone
2R,261
Slack or African American alone
N
American Indian and Alaska
Native alone
N
Asian alone
N
Native Hawallan and Other
Pacific Islander alone
N
Some other race alone
1S,962
Two or more races
43,499
Hispanic or Latino origin (of any
race)
65,684
White alone, not Hispanic or
Latino
20,915
EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT
Population 25 years and over
62,983
Less than high school graduate
16,382
High school graduate (includes
equivalency)
25.382
Some college, associate's
degree
17,113
Bachelor's degree or higher
14,106
EMPLOYMENT STATUS
Civilian labor force 16 years and
over
45.863
Employed
45,343
Male
23,312
Female
22,031
Unemployed
520
Male
200
Female
320
WORK EXPERIENCE
Population 16 years and over
73,073
Worked full time, year round
In the past 12 months
31,714
Worked part-time or part -year
In the past 12 months
15,443
Did not work
25,916
ALL INDIVIDUALS WITH INCOME
BELOW THE FOLLOWING
POVERTY RAT105
50 percent of poverty level
1,240
125 percent of poverty level
30,819
150 percent of poverty level
15,339
185 percent of poverty level
24,008
200 percent of poverty level
2S,682
300 percent of poverty level
47,892
400 percent of poverty level
62,166
500 percent of poverty level
73,899
e
UNRELATED INOIV IDUALS FOR
WHOM POVERTY STATUS IS
DETERMINED
12,610
Male
5.722
Female
�6,88B
15 years
o
16 to 17 years
O
16 to 24 years
706
25 to 34 years
1,850
35 to 44 years
'1,757
45 to 54 years
1,086
5S to 64 years
2,240
65 to 74 years
3,121
7S years and over
1,850
Mean income deficit for unrelated
�
Individuals (dollars)
7,053
Worked full-time, year-round in
the past 12 months
51252
Worked less than full time, year
round in the past 12 months
2,463
DId not work
4,89S
Population In housing ..its for
whom poverty status is
determined
91,958
IMargin of
Error
2181
12988
t 1,,344
32,561
12,988
t 2,856
32,765
t2,686
13,475
12,880
32,528
t2,494
Below poverty level Percent below poverty level
Estimate Er... gin of Estimate 1 Margin ofError
6,691
t2,417
7.3%
32.6
2,935
31,625
14. 1%
t7 5
647
t532
15 7%
t13 0
2.288
11,183
13, 7%
26.9
2,935
31,625
14.1%
27.5
2,395
t931
4 6%
tl 8
1,231
1893
5 8%
t4.2
1.164
1629
3 8%
11-9
1,632
1694
6 9%
32 8
1.361
t634
7 O%
23 1
1,718
1784
4 0%
31 a
4,973
12,023
20.0%
t4 O
t4,971
2,459
11.537
11 1%
t4 9
N
N
W
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
t4,098
815
2633
5.196
34.0
16,021
3,160
1-1,991
7.3%
t4.6
t4,469
4,768
t2.337
7 3%
13 6
t4,119
1.326
1596
6.3%
t2.4
32,99S
3,356
21,049
5.3%
21 6
12,552
725
3495
4 4%
t2.9
11,886
1.339
t708
8.7%
24.4
t2, 079
1,019
2653
6.0%
23.7
22,207
273
t197
1.9%
i1.4
t2,548
1, 328
2776
2.9%
t1.7
t2,559
1,239
t762
2 7%
21.7
21,880
253
1284
1.1%
t1.2
t2,036
986
5593
4-S%
t2.7
t311
89
3109
17.1%
223.2
t173
89
t109
44.5%
144.2
t291
0
t221
O 0%
t41.4
13,017
3,975
i1,254
5.4%
21.7
t2,902
523
2400
1 6%
11.3
22,316
2,060
1611
6.9%
33.9
t3,371
2,392
2928
9.2%
23.2
2686
(X)
(X)
(X)
IX)
13,537
(X)
(X)
(X)
(X)
24,334
(X)
(X)
(X)
IX)
t S,244
(X)
(X)
(X)
(X)
25,311
(X)
(X)
(X)
(X)
tS,533
(X)
(X)
(X)
(X)
15,09E
(X)
(X)
(X)
(X)
t4,196
(X)
(X)
JX)
(X)
12,880
2.166
t771
17. 2%
25.0
i1,529
"Sm.3379
10.4%
t6.7
t1,783
'1,S71
2703
22 8%
3BA.
t221
O
2221
-
••
2222
10
1221
1614
160
t263
22.79A
t35.4
t985
268
2318
14.5%
t17.1
t766
121
t156
6 9%
39 8
1748
218
t225
20.1%
t22.5
t1,055
356
t321
15.9%
t10.S
t1,067
798
1534
25.6%
214.4
3673
245
1186
13.2%
110.7
21,813
JX)
(X)
(X)
(X)
11,737
331
t313
6.3%
t6.1
3928
545
2377
22.1%
213.1
21,387
1,290
t641
26.4%
t10 3
t1B1
6,526
12,432
7.1%
12 •
I
J
ri�
L
Resolution No. 25264
Page 35
Coachella, California
Total
Label Estimate Margin of
Error
Population for whom poverty status
is determined 42,116 ±107
AGE
Under 18 years 9,215 ±942
Under 5 years 1,983 ±390
5 to 17 years 7,232 ±833
Related children of
householder under 18 years 9,215 ±942
18 to 64 years 28,531 t923
18 to 34 year. 11.915 ±967
35 to 64 year. 16,616 t1,032
60 years and over 6,620 ±876
65 years and over 4,430 ±691
SEX
Male 21,397 t767
Female 20,789 t777
RACE AND HISPANIC OR LATINO
ORIGIN
White alone 5,070 1942
Black or African American alone 192 ±181
American Indian and Alaska
Native alone 322 t21S
Asian alone 107 ±62
Native Hawaiian and Other
Pacific Islander alone 11 216
Some other race alone 20,890 11,738
Two or more races 15.584 t1,826
Hispanic or Latlno origin (of any
race) 41.215 1352
White alone, not Hispanic or
Latino 591 ±261
EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT
Population 2S years and over 28,480 t1,043
Less than high school graduate 11,B57 t1,001
High school graduate (im, iudes
equivalency) 11,563 3927
So a college, associate'.
degree 3,740 ±498
Bachelor's degree or higher 1.320 ±318
EMPLOYMENT STATUS
Civilian labor farce 16 years and
over 23,601 31,018
Employed 20,795 ±810
Male 11,639 t616
Female 91156 16S9
Unemployed 2.806 1526
Male 98B t349
Female 1,81a ±419
WORK EXPERIENCE
Populatlon 16 years and over 34,204 ±835
Worked full time, year round
in the past 12 months 16,060 t762
Worked part-time or part -year
In the past 12 months 61895 2746
Did not work 11,249 *833
ALL INDIVIDUALS WITH INCOME
6ELOW THE FOLLOWING
POVERTY RATIOS
SO percent of poverty level 1,481 ±461
125 percent of poverty level 6,719 11,087
150 percent of poverty level 10,305 ±1,450
185 percent of poverty level 1%'001 31,613
200 percent of poverty level 16,919 21,483
300 percent of poverty level 27,B33 ±1,S39
400 percent of poverty level 34.575 ±1,355
500 percent of poverty level 37,891 ±1.028
UNRELATED INDIVIDUALS FOR
WHOM POVERTY STATUS IS
DETERMINED 5,454 t734
Male 2,837 ±50S
Female 2,517 t447
15 years O ±28
16 to 17 years O 128
18 to 24 years 303 1164
25 to 34 years 1,133 t339
35 to 44 years 1,19S ±311
45 to 54 years 1,501 t378
55 to 64 years 786 t241
65 to 74 years 399 1139
7S years and over 137 1120
Mean Income deficit for unrelated '
individuals (dollars) 7,521 t1,437
Worked full-time, year-round in
the past 12 months 2,649 1522
Worked less than full time, year
and in the past 12 month. 1.699 t391
Did not work 1,106 1295
Population in housing units for
whom poverty status Is
determined 42,275 2106
Below poverty level Percent beloTw poverty level
Estimate ME. aorgIn of Estimate I E 6in of
4,710
1900
11.2%
±2 1
1,412
±432
15 3%
14 6
273
*121
13.8%
25.9
1,139
3375
15. 7%
*S.O
1,412
t432
15 3%
14 6
2,800
*511
9.8%
21.a
2,314
*381
11.0%
*3.1
1,486
*301
8.9%
51.8
667
1278
10.1%
±4 O
498
2284
11 2%
t5 9
11758
1427
8.2%
±2.0
2,952
*664
14.2%
t3 0
647
2326
12.8%
t5.5
0
t28
0.0%
±18.7
3
15
0.9%
t1.8
6
tll
S.691.
±10.3
O
t28
0.0%
±99.2
2,626
±638
22.5%
±3 1
1,438
t676
9.2%
±4 2
4,610
tags
11.2%
±2.2
91
±72
15.4%
±12.5
2,839
t569
10.0%
±2.0
1,725
t508
14.5%
±4 0
839
±243
7.3%
t2.1
151
*108
4.0%
t2.9
124
±78
9.4%
t6.0
1,563
±342
6.6%
SL4
1,077
*287
S.291.
11.4
454
t193
3 9%
t1.7
623
1178
6 8%
t1.9
486
1175
17.3%
16.5
93
*80
9.4%
16.2
393
the
21 6%
±9-3
3,510
1677
10.3%
11 9
SO5
5788
3.1%
11-2
810
1253
11 7%
13.5
2,19S
t559
'19.5%
14.5
(X)
(X)
(X)
(X)
(X)
(X)
(X)
(X)
(X)
(x)
(X)
(X)
(X)
(X)
(x)
(XI
(XI
(X)
(X)
(X)
(XI
(X)
(X)
(XI
(X)
(X)
(X)
(X)
Jx)
Mx)
W
(X)
1,168
±302
21.4%
±5.5
319
±175
'11.2%
±6.3
849
±240
32.4%
±8 4
O
±20
-
O
12B
'*
102
174
33.7%
±22 7
'1a4
±92
16.2%
19.0
'151
1132
12, 6%
t10 3
396
*174
26.4%
t10,3
243
1137
30.9%
t13.B
92
t65
23. 1%
±15.8
O
±28
`b.O%
±24 9
:X)
(X)
(X)
(X)
72
±76
2 7%
±2.9
366
1158
22.7%
*8.8
710
±226
64.2%
111.7
4,710
1900
11.29L
;2.1
Resolution No. 25264
Page 36
Language Data
Language Spoken at Home by Ability to Speak English for the population 5 Years and Over. Note L J
that the data below is sourced from the U.S. Census Bureau's American Community Survey (Table
B 16001), Palm Springs data is sourced from ACS 1-Year Estimates Subject Tables, 2015. Data
for other affected communities is from the latest source available: ACS 1-Year Estimates Subject
Tables, 2015.
Palm Springsrity, California
Desert Hot Springs
city, California
Cathedral CifE city, California
Label
Estimate
Margin of Error
Estimate
]farm of Error
Estimate
margin of Error
Total:
44,768
*278
25,730
*419
49.311
*464
Speak auly E
32,016
*771
13,492
*1,083
21.991
*930
Spanish or Spanish Creole:
9,926
*817
11,192
*974
24,693
*828
Speak English %wy well"
5,210
*543
7,369
*836
13,923
*771
Speak Enghsh less dtan'very
wen"
3.716
t532
3,823
*525
10,870
*690
Frexh (isrL Patois, Caj®):
450
*122
77
*47
64
*30
Speak English'—ywetl"
390
*104
77
*47
61
*29
Speak EQ&h less than -%yry
wen'
60
*39
0
*22
3
*6
French Creole.
0
*25
31
*39
0
*28
Speak Enghsb'my well'
0
*25
31
*39
0
*28
Speak Eazbsh Jew than :
wen"
0
*25
0
*22
0
*28
Frahm
142
*64
19
*25
85
*59
Speak English' —y weir
131
*64
19
*25
83
*58
" English leas than
well'
11
*11
0
*22
2
*3
Portuguese or Portuguese Creole:
83
*55
0
*22
87
AS
Speak English'tiery well"
70
t54
0
*22
59
*48
Speak EAghsh less than 'Nvry
wen"
13
*14
0
t22
28
*35
Germu:
452
*104
87
t66
160
*+67
Speak Fsglish 1-Y wdr
401
*105
69
*56
136
*62
Speak FA&IIsh lea than Vfty
wen"
51
*31
18
*2t
24
*26
Yi"sb:
4
*4
0
*22
5
*5
Speak EaRk,b %vry well'
4
*4
0
*22
3
f4
Speak Engbils Ien than 'very
wen"
0
*25
0
*22
2
*3
Other Rest Germadc languages:
100
*58
0
*22
7
*7
Speak Eaghsh "—y wen'
64
"1
0
*22
7
*7
Speak Enghsh less than
wen"
36
*27
0
*22
0
*28
Seandinasianlanguages:
27
*23
0
*22
19
*22
Speak IFogb-h ",ery well"
25
1:23
0
*22
l9
*22
Speak English less than '%yry
well"
2
*3
0
t22
0
*28
Gmk:
38
*38
0
*22
10
a
SpeakEssglish'4trywttr
34
*37
0
*22
6
*4
Speak En" less than Nfty
wen"
4
*7
0
*22
4
*6
Russian:
51
*33
0
*22
13
t14
Speak F.,0,hfierywen'
42
*30
0
*22
6
*8
Speak EaShils less than'%
wen"
9
tl0
0
*22
7
*12
Polish:
29
*24
0
*22
77
*92
Speak English'—y wen•
29
*24
0
*22
75
*92
Speak English Less than
weir
0
*25
0
*22
2
*3
Serbo-Croatian:
78
*63
0
t22
27
*39
Speak Enosh 1ery well"
54
*38
0
*22
14
*20
Speak Enghsh kssthan
wen"
24
*31
0
*22
13
*20
Other Slavic languages:
95
*64
0
*22
2
*3
Speak English -my Weir
82
*63
0
*22
2
*3
Speak EaSh3h ku than
wen"
13
*17
0
*22
0
*28
Armenian:
54
t36
91
*131
27
*45
speak Edosh %-y Well"
17
*13
82
*131
19
*32
S Less than
wen"
37
*37
9
*15
8
f14
Persian:
57
*44
0
*22
57
*51
Speak English avery wen"
45
*43
0
*22
38
*30
Speak En&* less than
wen"
12
*7
0
*22
19
*24
Gujarati:
0
*25
0
*22
0
*28
Speak Eaghsh eery well"
0
*25
0
*22
0
*28
Speak English lest than " s
wen"
0
*25
0
*22
0
*28
Hindi:
124
*127
0
*22
103
f98
Speak English %wy wdr
86
*76
0
*22
87
+8u
Speak Enoish lea dL*a
well"
38
363
0
*22
16
*19
Urdu:
76
*114
0
t22
13
*22
Speak Englssh "very wen"
27
*34
0
t22
13
*22
Speak English lets than %yry
wen"
49
*Sl
1 0
*22
0
*28
LI
Resolution No. 25264
Page 37
r
L
Palm Springs ells, California
Desert Hot S
ria s cin, C'atifornia
Cathedral City city, California
Label
Label
Estimate
�IarginofError
Estimate
Margin
Estimate
Margin ofError
Other Indic languages:
105
i101
33
±54
Ill
a`129
Speak English `tny well"
69
+64
24
:W
42
155
Speak English less than well'
36
s44
9
±14
69
f77
Other Indo-European languages:
30
f24
93
±147
72
f61
Speak English 'fiery well"
18
±20
'5
±117
42
±39
Speak English lrss than "vcry well"
12
ill
18
t30
30
:EB
Chinese:
107
t79
0
*22
112
±75
Speak F,n� *my well'
85
f'0
0
k22
58
:145
Speak English less thm %xry well"
22
±15
0
4:22
54
f53
Japanese:
61
i43
±11
24
f23
Speak Eaghsh 'tery well"
39
i39
111
16
t21
Speak aghsh im than %Try well"
22
tl'
0
t22
8
15
Korean:
24
f15
8
t13
11
f20
Speak English*�ery well"
5
f5
0
s22
11
:Em
SMk Ezosh less thn well"
19
112
8
±13
0
f28
Mon-Khmer, Cambodian:
0
i25
15-
±250
0
+28
Speak English %rry well"
0
±25
28
145
0
±28
Speak English less thug "very well"
0
f25
129
±205
0
+28
Hmong:
0
f25
0
f22
0
*78
Speak English "very well"
0
125
0
Q2
0
t28
Speak EngEsh less than well"
0
+25
0
+22
0
±28
Thai:
94
379
9
i15
0
f28
Speak English %vey well"
16
i16
0
±22
0
±28
Speak English less than "very well"
78
i'?
9
t15
0
f28
Laotian:
0
±25
0
t22
13
±,21
Speak English %efy well'
0
+25
0
±22
0
48
Speak Ezph less 'very weir
0
±25
0
+22
13
- 21
Vietnamese:
65
±50
8
±12
144
±100
Speak English %-my well"
48
i44
0
±22
56
±54
Speak English less than *very well"
17
i19
8
±12
88
±59
Other Asian laaguagm:
l I
f14
0
f22
4
t3
Speak English %Try Well,
l I
f14
0
f22
2
f2
Speak Ea kss than " well"
0
t25
0
f22
2
f2
Tagalog:
970
t226
234
±171
1,208
±321
Speak English"very well"
508
±162
136
*119
986
±262
Speak English less than "very well"
462
f120
98
±82
222
±108
Other Pacific Island languages:
234
f159
68
±50
106
±71
Speak English %,"y well"
106
±62
44
*36
32
+34
Speak English less than % we11"
128
1107
24
±37
74
±63
Navajo:
3
f5
0
t22
0
f28
Speak-Eaghsh'mywell"
2
13
0
f22
0
t28
Speak English less than "very well"
1
}3
0
+22
0
f28
Other Native North Amerkan languages:
0
f25
0
*22
4
14
Speak English'tiesy well"
0
Q5
0
±22
4
t4
Speak English less than well"
0
+25
0
+22
0
+29
Hungarian:
60
±26
20
±23
12
±17
Speak English %wy well"
37
t21
14
12l
11
±16
speak Enflish less than '%vfy well"
23
43
6
t9
1
f3
Arabic:
69
±31
114
f144
19
±19
Spmk Enghsh'%ery welt'
40
t21
8
42
19
:19
Speak English less than well'
29
41
106
+143
0
+29
Hebrew:
35
±31
0
f22
0
±28
Speak Eaghsh'lery well"
35
±31
0
t22
0
±28
Speak Enghsh less dm'%*ry well"
0
f25
0
t22
0
f28
African languages:
11
f13
0
Q2
13
±14
Speak English %-efywell"
8
±11
0
f22
13
f14
Speak English less than 'my well'
3
t4
0
+22
0
±28
Other and unspecified languages:
87
±100
0
t22
18
±,30
Speak English %try well"
77
i98
0
122
9
f 16
Speak En less than "very well"
10
114
0
i22
9
±14
Resolution No. 25264
Page 38
Rancho Mirage city, California
Palm Desert city, California
Indian Wells city, California
Label
Estimate
Margin of Error
Estimate
Margin of Error
EstkWe
Margin of Error
Total:
17,567
i113
43,527
*352
5,158
i26
Speak only Engthb
13,283
i413
35,631
i1,124
4,558
4,255
Spanish or Spanish Creole:
1003
*288
9,148
*1,031
58
i41
Speak English fiery well'
786
1254
6,126
i867
29
i33
Speak Enomh kss am % well"
217
i99
3,022
i562
29
i22
French (iwL Patois, Gjun):
61
i46
201
f125
71
yell
Speak English 'cry well"
53
i40
193
i123
65
�46
Speak Eaghsh less than well"
8
*14
8
*12
6
4
French Creole:
0
i19
0
i28
0
i17
Speak Fnghsh'\erywell"
0
i19
0
i28
0
i17
Speak English less thm "very well"
0
+19
0
*28
0
i17
Italian:
102
i68
167
192
0
i17
Speak B*hsh 1ery view
57
i48
136
*86
0
i17
SpeA FAginh less than well"
45
i44
31
i32
0
i17
Portuguese or Portuguese Creole:
154
=187
71
176
10
i15
Speak English 'NTry well'
152
i186
20
i24
0
117
Speak Enonh less elan 'M well"
2
i3
51
i59
10
i15
German:
61
i48
304
t115
10
i15
Speak English %wy well'
61
:6"
269
i120
10
i15
Speak English kss d= well'
0
*19
35
*54
0
*17
Yiddish:
57
i100
12
i19
0
±17
Speak English 'my well"
57
i100
12
i19
0
i17
Speal Ea kssthm'very well'
0
±19
0
i28
0
i17
Other West Germardc languagm:
28
±36
80
4:60
0
i17
Speak English %,cry well"
16
ilg
80
*60
0
i17
Speak En&hsh ksslhm'very weir
12
±19
0
i28
0
i17
Scandinadanlanguages:
14
115
48
i29
0
i17
Speak English %Tfy well"
14
±15
42
i28
0
i17
Speak Eaosb less than "very well"
0
*19
6
ill
0
*17
Greek:
0
4:19
213
i154
26
i29
Speak Enoch Hwy well'
0
i19
196
i143
16
i14
Speak Enea less than 'very well'
0
i19
17
i28
10
116
Russran:
0
i19
100
i106
0
:07
Speak Fngksh'%Trywell"
0
i19
51
i48
0
*17
Speak En&Lh less thin %yry well"
0
i19
49
i73
0
i17
Polish:
1
*3
47
*44
10
i14
Speak EnOA %ery well'
1
i3
47
i44
0
±17
Speak English imthm well'
0
i19
0
i28
10
i14
Serbo-Croatian:
12
i14
148
i109
0
i17
Speak English %vq well"
2
i3
102
i71
0
i17
Speak Enosh less than "my well"
10
i13
46
i42
0
i17
Other Slasiclangaages:
0
4:19
72
i100
0
i17
Speak E.aghrh'my well"
0
i19
13
+20
0
i17
Speak Eapsh less d= well"
0
*19
59
i98
0
*17
Armenian
74
i80
89
1103
0
±I7
Speak English eery well"
26
129
57
i63
0
117
SMI Enghsh lemdma"very well*
48
i75
32
i51
0
i17
Persian:
107
i67
120
±91
0
*17
Speak Fnglish %-y well`
80
154
76
i72
0
i17
Speak Enosh less drm we0"
27
i42
44
4:60
0
i17
Gujarati
0
i19
0
i28
0
i17
Speak English'%Yq well"
0
i19
0
*28
0
47
Speak Enosh less than 'very well"
0
i19
0
Q8
0
i17
Hindi;
0
i19
110
i112
0
*17
Speak Eaghsh %Try well"
0
*19
72
i82
0
*17
Speak EneA less than well'
0
i19
38
±34
0
*17
Urdu:
31
i51
116
1187
17
i27
Speak Fnghsh %cry well"
31
i51
0
i28
17
*27
ISpnk EnOA less than "sexy well"
0
+19
116
±187
0
i17
1
Resolution No. 25264
Page 39
Rancho Mira a cir% California
Palm Dwrt tit-, California
Indian `fens rin, California
Label
Estimate
53arg-ofError
Estimate
Margin of Error
Estimate
Margin of Error
Other Indic languages:
12
±13
51
*75
0
*17
Spent fiery• weir
1
t2
6
f12
0
t17
Speak Et&h less than wen'
11
:07
45
f73
0
±17
Other Indo-Earopean langnages:
115
t103
36
133
5
f8
Speak English'teay well"
76
*77
19
119
0
f17
SpeA Enosh kss than % wen'
39
*47
17
127
5
f8
Chinese:
35
f32
391
1222
68
*104
Speak Dish fiery weir
0
119
244
t149
13
f25
Speak Ec&h less than %try weft'
35
f32
147
199
55
40
Japanese:
24
*28
62
t76
149
433
Speak EngfuA'%rywet"
24
*28
8
42
93
f145
Speak Enghsh less than '% well'
0
09
54
176
56
as
Korean:
19
*26
52
10
33
t30
Speak English fiery• we
0
t19
19
122
17
49
less than wen'
19
*26
33
*43
16
*n
Mon-Khmer, Cambodian:
0
*19
21
133
0
117
Speak EgLh'%ery• welt
0
±19
0
f28
0
t17
Speak English kss then '%try wen'
0
±19
21
*33
0
tl7
Hmoq:
0
*l9
0
+28
0
47
speak En) S %-y weW
0
i 19
0
Q8
0
47
Speak Engbsh less d= 'vefy well'
0
119
0
1-28
0
:H7
Thai:
4
i4
22
f26
24
+A6
Speak Emosh'%Try well"
2
=3
0
*28
0
±17
S less d= %vfy well'
2
*3
22
±26
24
*46
Laotian:
0
f19
0
*28
0
117
Speak D*hsh eery well'
0
t19
0
t28
0
tl7
Speak Enosh less than wen'
0
t19
0
t28
0
}17
Vietnamese:
67
t69
236
±141
0
*17
Speak Eughsh'%wywell"
0
f19
101
*95
0
±17
Speak Enftsh lessthan '%vnwell'
67
f69
135
+97
0
*17
Other Asianlangvages:
22
*24
23
128
11
*19
SpeakEnglnh'%-ywdr
22
Q4
0
+29
11
*19
Speak Eposh ins d= *%wy wen'
0
f19
23
Q8
0
±17
Tagalog:
187
t126
598
*254
8
*12
Speak EngLh'%tryweir
174
:H24
454
t182
8
±12
Speak EnOA less than "seep wen'
13
:08
144
t123
0
t17
Other Pacific Island Iangnagts:
0
*19
97
f62
72
±107
Speak Fn&h ,%Tq weir
0
±19
82
A9
17
+25
less d= %viy we0'
0
* l9
15
*27
55
+82
Narajo:
0
*19
0
±18
0
f17
SpeakEngLsh'%erywen"
0
=19
0
*28
0
:17
Speak En&h less than'%try wen"
0
±19
0
t28
0
*17
Other Natise North American langnages:
2
t3
0
t28
0
:W
SgeakEagjash'%ery-Ir
2
t3
0
:28
0
117
Speak English less than wen'
0
f19
0
±28
0
fl7
Hugarian:
3
14
25
t27
14
f21
Speak 5#&h %Vq well"
0
:09
25
t27
14
f21
SMk Enosh Lesst5um'% well'
3
t4
0
f28
0
±17
Arabk:
44
1"
175
1123
14
t21
Spell: bosh eery weir
35
f32
120
496
0
*17
Speak En*h km than % weIr
9
3l4
55
±41
14
Q1
Hebrew:
45
f49
0
*28
0
fl7
Speak En4nh'%ery• weft
32
f33
0
128
0
f17
Spe2k Fm#A less than % well"
13
119
0
t28
0
*17
African LanguapS:
0
±19
61
A69
0
±17
Speak English *-) wdr
0
*19
61
369
0
±17
less tAm well'
0
t19
0
*28
0
*17
Other and anspeeified languages:
0
*19
0
*28
0
f17
Speak English 'very welt
0
t19
0
t28
0
t17
Speak En&h less than ';Try wen'
0
t19
0
t28
1 0
f17
Resolution No. 25264
Page 40
la h cih, Califoraia
Indio cits., California
Coachella citl-, California
Label
Estimate
Margin of Error
Estimate
]harp -of Error
Estimate
Mar& of Error
Total:
37,089
±475
77,613
±613
39,345
±412
mly Eglih
28,225
±975
33,538
f1,611
4.438
f759
Spanish or Spanish Creole:
7,125
±816
41,842
11,411
34,889
+818
Speak Ea&sh %wy well"
5,510
±695
24,145
f1,138
16,358
IS06
Speak Ecosb km dm'%"ywell"
1,615
1390
17,697
t1013
18,531
f8T2
French (mcl. Patois, Cajon):
220
Au
74
t46
0
t25
Speak Fmghsh fiery well'
Ill
:148
74
±46
0
*25
less than well'
49
07
0
±28
0
±25
French Creole:
0
±25
0
±28
0
f25
Speak b#1h %"y well"
0
f25
0
f28
0
t25
Speak EnOA less than *very wen"
0
f25
0
f28
0
125
Italian:
66
181
151
4:139
0
±25
Speak En&h %-y well'
39
A68
102
389
0
45
Speak Eqt;sh Im than well*
27
:E44
49
±53
0
±25
Formgwse or Poriagume Creole:
0
f25
0
±28
0
f25
Speak English %ery well"
0
125
0
±28
0
f25
Speak English less than " wen"
0
125
0
t28
0
f25
Germai:
213
t105
81
±56
0
±25
Speak English '—ywell'
169
197
78
±57
0
±25
Speak En*&h less than well"
44
±36
3
f6
0
f25
Yiddish:
0
±25
0
:28
0
125
Speak English %,ffy well"
0
±25
0
s28
0
±25
Speak English less than'very wen"
0
125
0
x28
0
f25
Other West Gereaank languages:
18
±28
36
t35
0
f25
Speak EngliA %Wy well'
0
125
36
A5
0
f25
Speak W less thin'very well'
18
f28
0
±28
0
t25
Scandinavian languages;
29
f31
8
±13
0
A25
Speak Fnosh%erywell'
29
±31
8
±13
0
f25
Speak EnOA less than 'my wen"
0
f25
0
±28
0
125
Greed
0
±25
30
f49
0
±25
Speak English'%-y wdr
0
±25
30
to
0
+25
Spuk En less than % well"
0
125
0
#28
0
*25
Russia:
0
125
38
-39
0
125
Speak Fogfish'mywell"
0
f25
10
z18
0
45
Spe,4 Eagfuh Iess than "crry wen"
0
±25
28
z25
0
f25
Fetish:
50
:bu
0
±28
0
+25
Speak English fiery well'
50
:48
0
±28
0
4:25
Speak Emoish less than %Try well,
0
+25
0
±28
0
±25
Serbo-Croatian:
11
±16
90
1136
0
f25
Speak Engbb tery well"
0
±25
85
f 136
0
f25
Speak English Irss tbm %vry well"
11
±16
5
4:7
0
±25
Other ShTk hags ":
17
±25
0
f28
0
*25
Speak Enosh'tiery well'
17
±25
0
f28
0
+25
Speak En&h less fl= 'my wen'
0
±25
0
f28
0
f25
Armewn:
83
06
41
139
0
f25
Speak FmOA "very well'
52
f59
31
137
0
f25
SrA En#sb Less than "my well"
31
in
10
f 14
0
f25
Fersiam:
0
±25
0
±28
0
f25
Speak Eagl A %-y well'
0
±25
0
±28
0
f25
Speak Enosh Imam %Wy well,
0
+In
0
±28
0
±25
Gajarad:
0
125
0
}28
0
f25
Speak English %,my wen"
0
±25
0
±28
0
±25
Less than %try wen"
0
t25
0
f28
0
±25
Hindi
0
±25
56
4:82
0
*25
Speak English'-y well"
0
±25
56
f82
0
125
Speak Engkih less than wen'
0
±25
0
±28
0
t25
Urdm:
0
±25
29
124
0
t25
Speak Eaghsh'very well"
0
:05
8
fl3
0
f25
Speak Enosh leuthan'serywell"
1 0
f25
1 21
f20
1 0
f25
I
J
0
fl
L
Resolution No. 25264
Page 41
La Quinta city, California
Indio cih, California
Coachella tin-, Cantors» a
Label
Estimate
Margin of Error
Estimate
Ma* of Error
Estimate
Margin of Error
Other Indic languages:
0
t25
213
t169
11
t22
Spakb#sh %-y-U"
0
t25
190
t149
11
t22
Speak English Less than wet'
0
t25
23
t29
0
:0
Other Indo-European languages:
96
±124
13
i20
0
1:25
Speak English %ny weU"
96
±124
13
t?0
0
f25
Speak Eqksh less thm'%vsywet"
0
±25
0
t28
0
f25
Chinese:
168
ti18
283
t157
0
t25
Speak Fnghsh'tiery well'
79
t61
89
t85
0
t25
Speak English Im dsan %try wet"
89
iu
194
t121
0
t25
Japanese:
116
t139
62
t39
0
t25
Speak Ec&h';ery wet"
39
±46
44
t32
0
±25
Speak a&hsb kss than "%Wy wet'
77
t101
18
t18
0
=25
Korean:
110
1130
199
t272
0
t25
SpeakLghsh'lvywen"
37
f57
10
±14
0
t25
Speak Fnglish less than 'very well'
73
t83
189
t265
0
t25
Mon-Khmer, Cambodian:
0
t25
0
t23
0
t25
Speak English %-ery wet'
0
t25
0
t28
0
t25
Speak English Less than'try wen'
0
t25
0
t28
0
t25
Hmotq:
0
t25
0
128
0
t25
Speak Eagfish "eery wet'
0
t25
0
t28
0
t25
Speak Enosh less than wet'
0
t25
0
t28
0
+25
Thai:
14
t25
0
t28
0
±25
Speak English'very well'
14
t25
0
t28
0
125
Speak En h less than "very weU"
0
t25
0
t28
0
�25
Laotian:
0
t25
0
t29
0
+25
Speak Engtish'my welr
0
t25
0
4�28
0
125
Speak Emghsh less than % wen'
0
t25
0
t28
0
±25
Vietnamese:
72
t69
166
t144
0
t?5
Speak English'%vy weU"
29
t42
57
169
0
f25
Speak Ez&b Less thm'%ery well"
43
t4
109
t109
0
t25
Other Asian languages:
0
f25
l8
t34
0
t25
Speak Enghsh %xqy well"
0
*25
18
t34
0
45
Speak English Im than 'my wet'
0
t25
0
t28
0
t25
Tagalog:
102
t105
259
t202
7
ell
Speak English %?fy wet"
102
±105
a7
t60
7
lilt
Speak English less than "very weU"
0
425
172
t158
0
t25
Other Patifk Island languages:
6
t15
26
t34
0
t25
Speak Enghsb %?ty wtU"
6
t15
20
t33
0
t25
Speak E*A Im thm wet'
0
f25
6
t11
0
125
Savajo:
0
f25
0
t28
0
t25
Speak English %Try well"
0
t25
0
t28
0
t25
Speak En less than %ery wet"
0
125
0
t28
0
125
Other Native North America languages:
0
t25
7
t1 l
0
f25
Speak Fnghsh %my will"
0
t25
7
t11
0
±25
Speak Engbsh less than wet"
0
t25
0
t28
0
t25
Hungarian:
0
125
3
t6
0
t25
Speak English'%trywet'
0
125
0
t28
0
t25
Speak Enghh less than '%ny wet"
0
t25
3
t6
0
±25
Anbk:
131
t107
205
t204
0
125
Speak Eng sh %iny weU'
97
t93
147
tl a3
0
t25
Speak Ez&sh less than wet"
34
±37
58
49
0
t25
Hebrew:
161
t210
27
-32
0
f25
Speak Enghsh%etywet"
20
t24
27
±32
0
t25
Speak En&sb less than "very wet"
141
t210
0
t28
0
w25
African languages:
13
t21
75
t83
0
t25
Speak English %ery weU'
13
t21
51
t59
0
t25
Speak Euglith Less 'my wet'
0
125
24
t38
0
t25
Other and unspecified I:ngaagm
43
t69
23
4:28
0
t25
Speak En&b'lery well"
43
168
23
t28
0
t25
Speak En less than % wet"
1 0
=25
1 0
t28
1 0
t25
15. Completed Unlawful Discrimination Poster 0
Unlawful Discrimination
It is unlawful for airport operators and their lessees tenants,
concessionaires and contractors to discriminate against any person
because of race, color national origin, sex creed or disability in
public services and employment opportunities Allegations of
discrimination should be promptly reported to the Airport Manager or:
Federal Aviation Administration
Office of Civil Rights, ACR-1
800 Independence Avenue. S W.
Washington. D C 20591
Federal regulations on unlawful discrimination are available for
review in the Airport Manager's Office
Coordinator Victoria Carpentef Airport Administrawn Manager
Phone (760) 318 38W Ext 3808
Address 3400 E. Tahquitz Canyon Way, Suite 1
Palm Springs, CA 92262
Email Victoria Carpenter- patmspnn isca gov
Dlscriminaclon Illegal
Se prohibe a los operadofes de aeropuertos y a sus arrendatarios, inquilinos,
concesionados y contratistas discriminar contra cualquier persona por motive
de raza color, nacionalidad de origen, sexo creencias religiosas, impedimento
tisrco o discapacidad en to que respecta a servicios pt&lcos y oportunidades
de empleo Las alegaciones de discriminacibn deberAn ser didgidas
inmediatamenle al Admmistrador del Aeropuerto o a.
Federal Aviation Administration
Office of Civil Rights, ACR-1
800 Independence Avenue, S W
Washington, D C 20591
Los reglamentos sobre discriminacibn ilegal estin a la disposicibn de
los interesados para su examen en la oficina del Administrador del
Aeropuerto
Coordinador Victoria Carpenter Airport Administration Manager
Tel6fono (760) 318-3800 Ext 3808
Direcci$n 3400 E Tahquitz Can on Way, Suite 1
Palm Springs, CA 92Y62
Email Victoria Carpentcropalmspringsca gov
US. Deportment of Transportation
Federal Aviation Administration