Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 5A - 1973 N Palm Canyon_Presentation_202501071973 N. Palm Canyon Drive Case # HDEMO 2024-0019 Major Alteration of a Class 4 Site January 7, 2025 PLANNING SERVICES DEPARTMENT Project Site & Context PLANNING SERVICES DEPARTMENT Proposed Review •Major Alteration of a Class 4 site (Section 8.05.130) • Property address: 1973 N. Palm Canyon Drive (APN #504-310-033) •Zone District: Retail Business Zone (C-1) •General Plan: Tourist Resort Commercial (TRC) PLANNING SERVICES DEPARTMENT Site Conditions Entrance to the site from the north along Palm Canyon Drive, 2025. PLANNING SERVICES DEPARTMENT Site Context 1965 aerial photograph. Courtesy Geospatial Collection, UCSB Library, University of California, Santa Barbara. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1.Pueblo style building constructed in 1937 with renovations completed in 1961. 2.Lobby building constructed in 1957 significantly altered from glass structure to stucco building. 3.Restaurant building constructed in 1957 significantly altered from original flat roof design to current building with mansard roof. 4.Two -story stucco building constructed in 1956. 5.One-story building designed by Armét & Davis and constructed in 1961. 6.Two -story building designed by Armét & Davis and constructed in 1961. PLANNING SERVICES DEPARTMENT Historic Context Armet & Davis’s rendering for the Palm Springs Sands Hotel and Convention Center. Source: “Googie Modern: Architectural Drawings of Armet Davis Newlove” by Michael Murphy and Alan Hess. Armet & Davis rendering of the two-story hotel structure for the Palm Springs Sands Hotel. Source: “Googie Modern: Architectural Drawings of Armet Davis Newlove” by Michael Murphy and Alan Hess. Municipal Code Section 8.05.070.C.1.a Criteria for the Designation of Class 1 Historic Resources The site, structure, building or object exhibits exceptional historic significance and meets one or more of the criteria listed below: Criterion i: The resource is associated with events that have made a meaningful contribution to the nation, state or community; Criterion ii: The resource is associated with the lives of persons who made a meaningful contribution to national, state or local history; Criterion iii: The resource reflects or exemplifies a particular period of national, state or local history; Criterion iv: The resource embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period or method of construction; Criterion v: The resource presents the work of a master builder, designer, artist, or architect whose individual genius influenced his age, or that possesses high artistic value; Criterion vi: The resource represents a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction, as used in evaluating applications for designation of historic districts, for parcels on which more than one entity exists; or Criterion vii: The resource has yielded or may be likely to yield information important to national, state or local history or prehistory. Criteria for Historic Designation • Location • Design • Setting • Materials • Workmanship • Feeling • Association PLANNING SERVICES DEPARTMENT Municipal Code Section 8.05.070.C.1.b Analysis of Integrity Municipal Code Section 8.05.070 Criteria for Possible re-designation of a Class 4 Building Any demolition/alteration permit shall be automatically stayed for a period of up to one-hundred twenty (120) days pending a re-designation decision. In making its review, the HSPB must make the following findings: 1. That the Class 3 or Class 4 building possesses exceptional historic, architectural, archaeological, cultural or aesthetic significance to warrant redesignation as a Class 1 or Class 2 historic resource in accordance with the criteria set forth in Section 8.05.070 above; and (meet criteria for designation) 2. That the Class 3 or Class 4 building retains sufficient historical integrity relative to its original configuration, architectural features, or character. PLANNING SERVICES DEPARTMENT Conclusion Based on the presented evidence in the application, the property at 1973 N. Palm Canyon Drive does not meet the criteria for historic designation to be reclassified as a Class 1 or 2 historic site. Recommendation Staff recommends that the HSPB take no action and allow the applicant to pursue next steps for building permits. Owners’ Position The property owners are not seeking historic designation. PLANNING SERVICES DEPARTMENT