HomeMy WebLinkAboutMJCIP Apps (52)RRRCITY OF PALM SPRINGS
MEASURE J COMMUNITY INITIATED
PROJECTS APPLICATION FORM
Name of Applicant: Ned Barker
Date Submitted: 9/30/2024
Applicant Type: Neighborhood
Name of Organization: Baristo Neighborhood Organization
If yes, provide IRS ID#
Tell us about your project:
1.Project Name: Baristo Park Improvements
2.Project Address: 439 Tan Oak Drive, Palm Springs
3.Project Type: Grant
4.This project improves:All
5. What demographic(s) does this project serve?
All
6. Estimated project cost: $537,210.00
7. Short description of proposed project.
Seeking funds to initiate and complete Phases 1 and 2 of our 3-Phase Project to
make Baristo Park Improvements. Fulfill the intent of the Parks and Recreation
Department Master Plan (2014),
Applicant’s information:
Name of Contact Person: Ned Barker
Contact Person’s Phone Number:(760) 898-9192
Contact Person’s Email Address: admin@baristops.com
Baristo Park
Proposal: Phase 1
SEPTEMBER 27, 2024
BARISTO PARK PROPOSAL | CONTENTS 2
Contents
COVER LETTER
PROJECT APPROACH
1. CONTRACTOR SUMMARY
2. CAPABILITIES AND METHODOLOGY
3. EXPECTED RESULTS
4. EXECUTIVES, STAFFING AND MANAGEMENT
5. COMMUNICATION
6. EQUIPMENT
7. EXPENSE BREAKDOWN
8. EXPENSE SUMMARY
9. LICENSING AND BONDING
10. INSURANCE
11. PROJECT REFERENCES
PROJECT SCHEDULE
PAYMENTS
BARISTO PARK PROPOSAL | COVER LETTER 3
Thank you for the opportunity to participate in
the Baristo Park Improvements project. We are genuinely
excited to be involved in such a meaningful initiative.
Our team, led by Sotelo Landscape Architects,
with Three Peak Corp. as the contractor and Michael Baker
International as our Civil, Structural, and Geotechnical
engineers, has studied and visited the site to evaluate its
potential and challenges. We’ve crafted a plan focused on
maximizing usable space, enhancing the park’s identity,
and creating a safe, vibrant gathering place for the
community.
In our meeting with the Riverside County Flood
Control and Water Conservation District (RCFC&WCD),
we explored potential solutions to increase open space
and connectivity within the park while ensuring a safe
environment for children at play. We aim to fulfill the
promise made in 1981 to turn this hideout into a real park,
combining openness and connectivity with art to create
a unique destination that enriches the neighborhood’s
quality of life.
Three Peaks holds General Engineering A and
General Building B licenses from the California Contractors
State License Board and is based in Calimesa. We have
successfully completed a diverse range of projects,
including sports parks, pocket parks, amphitheaters, and
playgrounds, in cities such as Yucaipa, El Centro, Redlands,
Riverside County, San Bernardino County, Brea, Fullerton,
and throughout the Coachella Valley.
Our firms bring together an impressive portfolio
of projects, providing us with the experience and
expertise to deliver this project with the utmost care
and professionalism. Our consultants have successfully
worked together on numerous occasions and are eager to
collaborate once more on this exciting project.
Cover Letter
BARISTO PARK PROPOSAL | PROJECT APPROACH 4
GENERAL APPROACH
Our project process will aim to revitalize Baristo Community Park, addressing the
urgent needs of the neighborhood while fostering a sense of community identity and
pride. Through collaborative efforts with stakeholders and understanding of Baristo’s
unique community identity, this project aims to create a revitalized Community Park that
serves as a safe, inclusive, and vibrant hub for residents. Together, we can transform
Baristo Community Park into a cherished asset for current and future generations.
DESIGN APPROACH
The bubble diagram below visually represents the key needs and requirements
for the revitalization of Baristo Park. This diagram illustrates our holistic approach to
transforming the park into a vibrant hub for families and individuals alike.
LEGEND
1. Decorative guard
rail along channel
2. Guard rail or
planted hedge
3. Overhead entry sign
4. Landscape inspired
by Palm Springs
5. Lawn near bridge to
open up views
6. Play structure and
shade to remain
7. Colored concrete
paths
8. Convert
maintenance path
to a multi use trail
9. Foot bridges
10. New amenities
11. New historic marker
monument
12. New light fixtures
13. New benches
14. Resurfaced
basketball court
15. New bleachers and
shade structure
16. Decorative fence
Figure 1. Bubble Diagram
ALTERNATES
A. Rubber Play Surfacing
B. Second overhead sign
structure
C. Add misters to shade
structures
Project
Approach
BARISTO PARK PROPOSAL | PROJECT APPROACH 5
• SEATING. Ample seating options will be
included throughout the park to encourage
social interaction and relaxation.
• COOLING AREA / SPLASH PAD. A splash pad will
provide a refreshing respite from the summer
heat, making the park a popular destination
for families.
• BRIDGES OVER THE STORM CHANNEL. The
design will ensure safety and connectivity
while maintaining the natural beauty of the
surrounding area.
• ELIMINATE HIDING SPACES. Careful landscaping
and design choices will be made to enhance
visibility and safety throughout the park.
• INCORPORATE EXISTING RECREATION FACILITIES.
The existing basketball court and playground
will be integrated into the new design,
enhancing usability.
• IMPROVE OVERALL APPEARANCE. We will focus
on aesthetics, ensuring that the park is not
only functional but also visually appealing,
fostering community pride.
Our approach to essential features that will
enhance the park’s functionality, accessibility and
overall appeal are listed next.
• WELCOMING APPEARANCE. Design elements
will include colorful landscaping and engaging
signage that reflect the vibrancy of Baristo.
• WATER AND ELECTRICITY ACCESS. Infrastructure
will support both recreational activities and
community events.
• USABLE SPACE FOR PET WALKING. Ample
pathways will be inclusive to all, including pets
and their owners. Signage will be provided to
promote responsible pet ownership.
• SAFE PATHWAY TO DOWNTOWN PALM SPRINGS.
Well-lit, secure pathways will connect the
park to downtown, enhancing walkability and
accessibility.
• COMMUNITY GATHERING AREA FOR EVENTS. A
flexible space for events will be designed to
accommodate cultural celebrations, markets
and community meetings.
PROJECT COORDINATION
We will address all stakeholders—The
Baristo Neighborhood Organization, the City of
Palm Springs, Riverside County Flood Control
and Water Conservation District, and the Public
Arts Commission—to create a vibrant and
welcoming space that meets the unique needs
of Baristo’s diverse population.
• BARISTO NEIGHBORHOOD ORGANIZATION.
We will collaborate closely with community
leaders to ensure that the park reflects the
values and aspirations of Baristo residents,
incorporating their feedback into the design
process.
• CITY OF PALM SPRINGS. Partnering with
the city will be crucial for navigating
regulations and securing funding. We will
leverage city resources to enhance the
park’s accessibility and usability for all
residents.
• RIVERSIDE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF FLOOD
CONTROL. To safely address the storm
channel, we will work with this department
to design a bridge that connects the two
halves of the park, ensuring that it is both
functional and aesthetically pleasing.
• PUBLIC ARTS COMMISSION. We will
incorporate public art elements that
celebrate Baristo’s rich cultural diversity,
creating visual connections that enhance
community identity and pride.
BARISTO PARK PROPOSAL | CONTRACTOR SUMMARY 6
THREE PEAKS CORP,
GENERAL CONTRACTOR
Three Peaks Corp. was established in 2009 and has since gained the trust and
respect of both public and private entities by successfully completing over
300 projects. We maintain crews of multi-trade talented employees. We have
completed a wide range of projects including but not limited to: sports parks, dog
parks, skateparks, pocket parks, restroom/ concession buildings, amphitheaters,
playgrounds, shade structures, parking lots, turf conversion projects, and field
lighting projects. Our company has worked with a number of public agencies
including City of El Centro, Heber PUD, City of Yucaipa, City of Redlands, County of
Riverside, County of San Bernardino, City of Brea, City of Fullerton, and most of the
Cities in the Coachella Valley. Our vast network of suppliers and subcontractors
throughout Southern California including the Imperial Valley are paramount to the
successful completion of every project we work on. Additionally, Three Peaks Corp.
certifies that the company is in good standing with all licensing boards and is
eligible to contract with any federal, state or local public agency.
SOTELO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS,
LEAD DESIGNER & LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
Sotelo Landscape Architects is an award-winning firm with over 20 years
of experience in designing innovative outdoor social spaces that blend art,
architecture, and environmental passion. Our projects range from private
residences to large-scale developments like casinos and resorts, both nationally
and internationally. Our team combines diverse expertise in a collaborative design
process, emphasizing clear communication and integrity. We focus on creating
inspiring, timeless spaces that fit perfectly with their surroundings, featuring clean
lines and a carefully curated plant palette. Committed to sustainability, we prioritize
drought-tolerant design and the long-term usability of each site, ensuring our
projects endure.
1.Contractor
Summary
REFERENCES: City of Yucaipa
34272 Yucaipa Blvd.
Yucaipa, CA 92399
Fermin Preciado
Director of Development Services
fpreciado@yucaipa.org
(909) 797-2489, Ext 240
City of Indio
100 Civic Center Mall,
Indio, CA 92201
Tim Wassil
Public Works Director
twassil@indio.org
(760) 625-1801
REFERENCES: Joseph Baruffaldi Jr., AIA
HBG Design
jbaruffaldi@hbg.design
(203) 915-6840
Stephanie Schillig, CID, NCODQ
Design Director
stephanie@igroupdesign.com
(619) 439-9538
BARISTO PARK PROPOSAL | CONTRACTOR SUMMARY 7
MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL,
CIVIL & STRUCTURAL AND GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING
Michael Baker International has been a leader in engineering and consulting
services for over 80 years, tackling complex infrastructure challenges with expertise
and innovation. With offices throughout southern California, including Palm Desert,
they have a history of working on public projects like roads, bridges, mass transit
and water treatment in Southern California with ample experience with Riverside
County Flood Control. They act as trusted advisers to communities, enhancing
safety, accessibility, and sustainability. Committed to transformational change, their
dedicated experts challenge the status quo and bring diverse experiences to the
table. Ultimately, they focus on delivering quality of life through visionary leadership
and innovative solutions.
RIZZA ENGINEERING INC,
ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING
Rizza Engineering is a nationally recognized, award-winning Electrical Engineering
and Lighting Design firm based in Poway, CA. With a global reach, they specialize in
the Hospitality, Education, and Wellness sectors, delivering tailored solutions that
enhance each project. Their experienced team excels in power systems design,
architectural lighting, telecommunications, and electronic security, ensuring
successful outcomes for complex projects. From master planning to construction
administration, they embrace challenges with a can-do attitude. Committed to
sustainability, their LEED Accredited professionals help clients achieve eco-friendly
goals while minimizing life cycle costs, making them a trusted partner for owners,
architects and contractors alike.
REFERENCES: City of Coachella
1515 Sixth Street
Coachella, California 92236
Jonathan D Hoy
City Engineer
(760) 398-5744
Riverside County
Flood Control District
1995 Market Street
Riverside, CA 92501
Ms. Julianna Gonzalez
(951) 955-8064
juliannagonzalez@rcflood.org
REFERENCES: Sam Passanisi
President of Neal Electric
sam.passanisi@nealelectric.com
(619) 742-8858
Kevin Cammall
Managing Corporate Officer of
Soltek Pacific Construction
kcammall@soltekpacific.com
(619) 417-2257
BARISTO PARK PROPOSAL | CAPABILITIES AND METHODOLOGY 8
PHASE 1: FEASIBILITY AND COST
In this phase our design team, composed of the executives and staff listed in section 4 of
this proposal, will start working on preliminary designs for the project. We’ve outlined the
steps of this phase in the following points:
1. Our team will coordinate and attend a project Kick-off meeting within one (1) week of
receiving the Notice-to-Proceed. The purpose of the meeting will be to introduce the
team, establish clear lines of communications, refine the proposed scope, schedule,
regulatory items, approval processes and establish general design guidelines. Ú
written summary will be provided to all the parts.
2. We will perform necessary data collection that will include research, gathering
and reviewing existing City, and County records appropriate for the project. This
information will include but not be limited to:
• Previous planning drawings and documents
• Previous site improvement plans
• Existing utility record drawings
• City and County record drawings
• Water and sewer maps
3. An initial survey of the site will be prepared to determine the limits of the easement,
utilities, boundaries and topography. The resulting drawing will serve as the base our
preliminary design drawings.
4. A preliminary foundation report will be prepared by our Geotechnical engineers
based on surface data to provide preliminary recommendations and assist structural
designers in the feasibility study (Phase I Report, as stated in the RFP).
5. Sotelo Landscape Architects will prepare preliminary drawings, sketches and ideas
showing the proposed improvements. Items related to the improvements for the flood
channel will be thoroughly reviewed by the design team, receiving feedback and
leaning on the experience of team members with working relationship with Riverside
County Flood Control.
6. Our design team will hold meetings with the Board, City and Riverside County Flood
Control & Water Conservation District to explore the feasibility of the project. In these
meetings we’ll receive input regarding the two main issues of the project: flood
channel improvements and other additional park improvements.
7. The comments from these initial meetings will shape the design by providing possible
solutions to the key project challenges. We’ll incorporate changes into the preliminary
plans and meet with the involved agencies again for a design review.
8. If no further comments occur, the preliminary design will be further developed into a
preliminary masterplan. It will then be distributed to the civil, structural and electrical
2. Capabilities and
Methodology
BARISTO PARK PROPOSAL | CAPABILITIES AND METHODOLOGY 9
engineers with enough information to develop preliminary submittal documents.
9. The contractor in coordination with the entire team will prepare preliminary cost
estimates based on the approved design and coordinate the submittals to the City of
Palm Springs and the RCFC&WCD and provide us with their feedback.
BARISTO PARK PROPOSAL | EXPECTED RESULTS 10
GENERAL APPROACH
One of our responsibilities as the design-build team is to work closely with the
Board to help them identify, understand, and evaluate a wide array of considerations
that directly and indirectly shape their project. We have assembled a team of industry
professionals whose experience will help the Board navigate these decisions to best align
their vision and goals with project opportunities and constraints.
Several of these considerations include:
• Foot bridges, decorative fencing, new pathways, new landscaping, new
lighting, resurfacing basketball, entry signs, site furniture, possible shade
structures, water feature or splash pad, new bleachers with shade structure,
possibly resurfacing play areas and adding misters to new shade structures
and other amenities best suited to host the community needs for Baristo Park.
• Park operations, maintenance, management, and related considerations.
• Prioritization of facilities, capabilities, and amenities to align with budget
constraints.
• Strategies, selections, construction requirements, and creative opportunities
to best utilize project funding, honor time restrictions, and plan for future
potential.
VALUE-BASED DESIGN AND ENGINEERING
It is our team’s intent to develop the park while continually evaluating the project
for value throughout the course of the design, engineering and construction. Our team’s
collective experience and understanding of the Board’s priority to maximize value will
guide our materials selections, building systems evaluation, functional and operational
recommendations, and the like. We have found that projects are best served when value
decisions are revisited during the course of all phases of development. Our focus on
value is established in a detailed review meeting at the beginning of the project. Value is
measured in multiple ways and it is vital that the design responds to these priorities as
determined by the Board – cost/benefit, life-cycle, durability, capital/operational value,
and similar. It is critical to the success of any project to have project priorities, scope,
and budget aligned before significant design and engineering work commences. This
firmly establishes the target in advance and provides a clear baseline against which the
project design and decisions can be evaluated over the course of the entire project’s
development.
3. Expected
Results
BARISTO PARK PROPOSAL | EXPECTED RESULTS 11
PHASE 1: FEASIBILITY AND COST
Our deliverables for this phase would be:
• A preliminary Master Plan to scale and in color showing the proposed
improvements, for presentation to the community and agencies
• A Landscape Site plan showing all improvements with notes on materials, finishes
and design intent
• Enlarged plans, sections and elevations for bridges, shade structures, and other
possible amenities such as event plaza, overhead entry signs, decorative fencing,
bleachers, splash pad, etc.
• 3D renderings
• Preliminary structural Bridge studies
• Dry utility coordination, Storm Drain layout and analysis
• Storm Water Hydrology Calculations as required by RCFC&WCD
• Storm Water Quality Calculations and Analysis (if required)
• Preliminary evaluation of existing utilities
• Preliminary Lighting layout and selection of fixtures
• Provide a fee based on the approved design for developing the plans for
construction
• Preliminary cost estimate for the proposed improvements
BARISTO PARK PROPOSAL | EXECUTIVES, STAFFING AND MANAGEMENT 12
4.Executives, Staffing
and Management
ERIK SIMMONS,
Three Peaks Corp., President,
State of California Licensed Contractor Type A, B, C-10, C-33
Erik is a graduate of California State University San Bernardino with a BA in
Entrepreneurial Management and a graduate of University of Redlands with a Master
of Business Administration. Prior to starting Three Peaks Corp., he worked for a home
builder and was responsible for the coordination of permits and approvals from various
municipalities and government agencies, construction document review, construction
estimates, preparing bid packages, implementing project controls, construction
coordination and project closeouts. Since founding Three Peaks Corp. in 2009 the
company has completed over 300 public works projects throughout Southern California.
Erik oversees all company operations.
THREE PEAKS CORP, GENERAL CONTRACTOR
RICHARD ALLEN,
Three Peaks Corp., Project Manager/ Head Estimator,
Richard is a graduate of California State University San Bernardino with a BS in
Economics and Business Administration with over 37 years of construction experience.
Prior to joining Three Peaks Corp., Richard managed and completed hundreds of
landscapes and park development projects for both private and public entities. Since
joining Three Peaks Corp. Richard has helped establish the company as a trusted leader
in park construction having completed over 30 park projects since 2019. Personally, his
most revered qualification is that every client he has worked with over those 37 years is
happy with the completed projects and can be used as a reference.
PROJECT MANAGEMENT
During all phases of development a project manager will be assigned to the
project for all aspects of the project. While managing their other projects they will attend
all required design meetings and coordinate with the design team providing input on
specifications, costs and lead times to ensure the projects success. Upon issuance of final
construction documents they will then manage the construction of the project to turnover.
FIRM STAFF CAPACITY:
34 Full Time Employees
DEDICATED STAFF:
• President
• Project Manager
BARISTO PARK PROPOSAL | EXECUTIVES, STAFFING AND MANAGEMENT 13
ANGELINA SOTELO, ASLA, LEED AP
Sotelo Landscape Architects
Principal, RLA #5254
Angelina is an active member of the ASLA and has been designing landscapes in
Southern California for over 20 years. With experience spanning more than 2,000
projects and numerous awards, her work has garnered widespread recognition.
In 2011, she founded Sotelo Landscape Architects, where she leads a talented
design team with global expertise, enriched by diverse academic, artistic, and
environmental backgrounds. Her firm integrates specialized knowledge into a
collaborative design process that extends beyond the office, fostering strong
relationships with clients and consultants to meet even the most demanding time
and budget requirements. Her team values open communication, integrity, and
are committed to upholding both our design principles and our clients’ values
throughout every project.
SOTELO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS, LEAD DESIGNER
Angelina Sotelo will serve as the primary contact for your project, personally
handling the design, attending meetings, and overseeing its progress. Additionally,
a dedicated Project Manager will be assigned to coordinate documentation and
supervise production. Our Project Manager, currently based in Palm Desert, will
be readily available to visit the site during construction and assist contractors in
maintaining the design intent throughout the process.
FIRM STAFF CAPACITY:
10 Full Time Employees
DEDICATED STAFF:
• Principal ($200hr)
• 1 Project Manager ($150 hr)
• 1 Irrigation Designer ($120 hr)
• 2 Project Designers ($100 hr)
• 1 Draftsperson ($80 hr)
BARISTO PARK PROPOSAL | EXECUTIVES, STAFFING AND MANAGEMENT 14
GREG KUMP, PE, QSD
Michael Baker International
Senior Associate - Land Development
With extensive engineering leadership in public and private sectors, his expertise
includes streets, sewer, water, drainage systems, and hydraulic design. He has a
strong background in navigating local, state, and federal permitting processes and
providing cost estimating services while overseeing projects to ensure they meet
design specifications and quality standards. Specializing in parks and recreation
faciliries, his typical involvement in park development includes tasks such as prepar-
ing detailed topographic maps, master plans, conceptual designs, and construction
plans, as well as providing contract administration and overseeing construction. He
has ample experience working with Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conser-
vation District (RCFC&WCD).
MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL,
CIVIL, STRUCTURAL & GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING
FIRM STAFF CAPACITY:
4,500 Full Time Employees
DEDICATED STAFF:
• 1 Project Manager ($270 hr)
• 1 Senior Bridge Engineer ($262 hr)
• 1 Technical Manager ($225hr)
• 1 Project Engineer ($180 hr)
• 1 Bridge Engineer ($170 hr)
SOFIA E. LANDIS, P.E.
Michael Baker International
Senior Engineer / Project Manager
Civil Engineer with expertise in project management and technical design, including
prestressed precast concrete bridges, post-tensioned bridges, concrete retaining
walls, and MSE walls. Experienced in various delivery methods, including Design-Build
and traditional Design-Bid-Build. Skilled in preparing planning documents, PS&E, and
providing construction support. Also serves as an owner’s representative, preparing
bridging documents and cost estimates to assist with programming.
BARISTO PARK PROPOSAL | EXECUTIVES, STAFFING AND MANAGEMENT 15
MICHAEL RIZZA, PE, RCDD, CTS-D, LEED AP
Rizza Engineering, Inc.
Principal and President / CEO
Michael has over 25 years of experience in electrical engineering and lighting design.
As a licensed Professional Engineer in 11 states, he is known for his dedication to client
relationships and his expertise in building design. With a background as an electrical
contractor, he effectively visualizes installations and communicates ideas to create
practical solutions for his team.
As a skilled team leader responsible for overseeing the project team and dealing with
contractual issues, clients appreciate his ability for listening to requirements and
recommend solutions that technically and financially benefit the project. His technical
knowledge of Power Distribution & Generation, Lighting Design & Controls, and Low
Voltage Systems craft a turn-key electrical package. His passion for sustainability and
energy efficiency has led him to become a LEED Accredited Professional. Flexible and
innovative designs provide owners with the ability to adapt their facilities for future
changes.
RIZZA ENGINEERING
ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING
FIRM STAFF CAPACITY:
4,500 Full Time Employees
DEDICATED STAFF:
• Principal ($230 hr)
• 1 Associate ($205 hr)
• 1 Engineer ($160 hr)
• 1 Lighting Designer ($150 hr)
BARISTO PARK PROPOSAL | COMMUNICATION & EQUIPMENT 16
Three Peaks Corp. utilizes Autodesk Build to manage their projects. This ensures
open communication between the office and the field. Their systems safeguard and
ensure superior quality, code compliance, coordination of drawings and specifications.
Three Peaks’ field personnel are trained to employ quality work which prevent re-work,
condense schedules and provide the communities in which we work with a high-quality
product.
Design quality control is a significant part of their long history of successful
projects and the process is reflected in the chart below. They work with all stakeholders
early on to ensure budgets, schedules, and expectations are agreed upon and clearly
communicated. Designs are created and continuously measured against these definitions
of success to ensure a proper outcome and follow through is achieved with minimal
surprises. They recognize that though each design phase is evaluated differently, it’s
important to revisit the initial goals and objectives. Regular communication will be
maintained with all parties to assess the current project trajectory and plan for effective
counter measures as challenges or changes arise.
During the design phase, the team will hold regular meetings, share documents
via a cloud platform, and present progress drawings and exhibits to the board. This
approach ensures a smooth and collaborative design process.
5.
Communication
Three Peaks Corp. maintains an compliant fleet of equipment. They maintain crews of
multi-trade talented employees. Their owned equipment includes:
• Dump trucks
• Water trucks
• Excavators
• Track loaders
• Skid Steers
• Scrapers
• Asphalt paver
• Various compaction equipment
Any additional equipment needs will be provided through thei vast network of rental
company partners.
6.
Equipment
BARISTO PARK PROPOSAL | EXPENSE BREAKDOWN 17
PHASE 1. FEASIBILITY AND COST TOTAL $148,800.00
1A. CIVIL, STUCTURAL AND GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS $48,400
Site Investigations $3,100.00
Site Support and Coordination $2,500.00
Preliminary Bridge Studies $13,000.00
Dry Utility Coordination $1,200.00
Storm Drain layout and Analysis $2,600.00
Storm Water Hydrology Study $5,900.00
Hydrology Study $8,900.00
Storm Water Quality Calculations and Analysis $4,600.00
Feasibility Exhibits $2,600.00
Meetings & Coordination $4,000.00
1B. GEOTECHNICAL STUDIES $17,300.00
1C. TOPO AND BOUNDARY SURVEY $32,100.00
Site Topo Survey $14,700.00
Boundary Survey $7,300.00
Mapping, Research, Clacs, Analysis, Mapbase $5,500.00
Easement Plotting $2,000.00
Utility Mapping (AirX) $2,600.00
1D. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT $38,500.00
Site Visit and Data Collection $2,000.00
Base Map on Survey $1,000.00
Preliminary Design $9,000.00
Color Site Plan For Board Presentation $2,500.00
Schematic Design Details $4,500.00
Preliminary Landscape Design And Plant Palette $3,500.00
3d Renderings $1,500.00
Utility Coordination $2,500.00
Up To 2 Revisions To Design $2,500.00
Documents For Preliminary Submittal To Rcfc $3,500.00
Opinion Of Probable Cost $2,000.00
Coordinations, Presentations And Meetings $4,000.00
1E. ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING $8,000.00
Evaluation of Existing Utilities and Layout of Fixtures $8,000.00
1F. CONTRACTOR AND PROJECT MANAGER $4,500.00
Cost Estimate and Project Coordination $4,500.00
FEASIBILITY ALTERNATE: RESTROOMS ADDITIONAL $15,500.00
Architectural Services $8,500.00
Structural Engineering Services $2,000.00
Mechanical, Plumbing, Electrical, T-24 Services $2,000.00
Additional Coordination $3,000.00
7.Expense
Breakdown
BARISTO PARK PROPOSAL | EXPENSE SUMMARY 18
PHASE 1. FEASIBILITY AND COST TOTAL $148,800.00
1A. Civil, Structural and Geotechnical Engineers $48,400.00
1B. Geotechnical Studies $17,300.00
1C. Topo and Boundary Survey $32,100.00
1D. Landscape Architect $38,500.00
1E. Electrical Engineering $8,000.00
1F. Contractor and Project Manager $4,500.00
FEASIBILITY ALTERNATE: RESTROOMS ADDITIONAL $15,500.00
8.Expense
Summary
BARISTO PARK PROPOSAL | LICENSING, BONDING & INSURANCE 19
a. CSLB: 941528 -A, B, C-10, C-33 EXP. 12/31/2025
b. Rule 403.1 Coachella Valley Fugitive Dust Control Training
c. Bonding Capabilities: 10MM Single Project, 20MM Aggregate
9.Licensing
and Bonding
a. General Liability: 1MM/ 2MM
b. Automobile Liability: 1MM
c. Umbrella Liability: 4MM/4MM
d. Workers Compensation: 1MM
e. Inland Marine: 250K
10.
Insurance
BARISTO PARK PROPOSAL | LICENSING, BONDING & INSURANCE 20
AGUA CALIENTE CULTURAL MUSEUM
SOTELO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
The Agua Caliente Cultural Plaza in Palm Springs,
California, is a significant cultural center dedicated to
the history, heritage, and contemporary culture of the
Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians. Opened in 2023,
the plaza serves as both a tribute and a living museum,
showcasing the traditions, art, and history of the Cahuilla
people.
The design of the Agua Caliente Cultural Plaza is deeply
connected to the surrounding desert landscape and
Cahuilla cultural symbols. It incorporates a Plaza for
cultural events and an Oasis Trail with native plants and
features water elements, drawing attention to the tribe’s
enduring relationship with nature. It serves as a place of
learning, wellness, and cultural exchange for both tribal
members and the public.
REFERENCES:
Dan Malcolm, AICP
Director of Planning
Phone: 760-883-1945
Email: dmalcolm@aguacaliente-nsn.gov
Bill Jeorling
Senior Project Manager JCJ Architecture
Phone: 602-909-3975
Email: bjeorling@jcj.com
11.
Project References
BARISTO PARK PROPOSAL | LICENSING, BONDING & INSURANCE 21
OTAY RANCH PARKS,
SOTELO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
Situated in the heart of Otay Ranch, we designed four
parks inspired by the charm of small-town America and the
elegance of 20th-century parks. These parks feature state-of-
the-art play structures, welcoming entry porticos, and shaded
seating areas with tables and benches beneath graceful
pergolas. Orchards line the main entrances, while winding paths
and gently rolling lawns encourage both active and leisurely
activities. Lush border plantings further enhance the serene
atmosphere. These parks were created as a Principal and
Project Manager of David Reed Landscape Architects.
REFERENCES:
David Reed ASLA
David Reed Landscape Architects
david@drasla.com
(619) 971-1962
Don Ross, Project Manager
The Otay Ranch Company
(619) 397-1641
BARISTO PARK PROPOSAL | LICENSING, BONDING & INSURANCE 22
MICHAEL S. WOLFSON PARK
THREE PEAKS CORP
Dedicated on November 26, 1986, Michael S. Wolfson
Park is located at DaVall and Frank Sinatra Drives on a one-acre,
triangular-shaped parcel adjacent to the trails system and the
Whitewater Wash. This Park follows a Victorian Theme, featuring
a fountain, decorative lighting fixtures, benches, a Braille-
marked trail and a fragrance garden. A recorded “welcome”
from Dinah Shore and Frank Sinatra, who lived nearby, may be
heard at the entrance to the park.
REFERENCES:
City of Rancho Mirage
Charles Nesbit
ADA Coordinator
charelsn@ranchomirageca.gov
Phone: (760) 285-0244
BARISTO PARK PROPOSAL | LICENSING, BONDING & INSURANCE 23
MECCA SPORTS COMPLEX,
THREE PEAKS CORP.
Three Peaks teamed with HDG on the construction of
Mecca Sports Park, HDG was responsible for the design that
would provide the under-served community of Mecca with an
exciting new park. The California Outdoor Access for All Initiative,
the County of Riverside, and CDBG provided the necessary
funding that would bring the Mecca community’s vision to
fruition. The Park design included amenities that the community
deemed as needed and desired through a series of community
workshops. The Park design features the following amenities:
a sports fields, splash pad, sand volleyball courts, play and
picnic areas, and a kiosk for special events. Additionally, a
restroom and concession building will provide the park with the
opportunity to offer food service to visitors.
REFERENCES:
References:
County of Riverside
Anna Rodriguez
760-863-2537
aarodriguez@rivco.org
44199 Monroe Street, Suite B
Indio, CA 92201
BARISTO PARK PROPOSAL | PROJECT REFERENCES 24
KELVIN PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE PROJECT,
MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL
The project included preliminary evaluation, design,
and construction of a multi us path and pedestrian bridge over
Barranca Channel, owned and operated by Orange County
Flood Control District (OCFCD).
Michael Baker performed a feasibility study, which
documented the existing conditions, evaluated future
considerations for the OCFCD channel, explored feasible bridge
alternatives, and documented total future construction costs for
the project moving forward. The feasibility study also explored
the necessary permits, right of way, and steps toward obtaining
environmental clearance for the project.
As part of the subsequent phase, the Michael Baker
team designed the joint use path and bridge spanning the
Barranca Channel: a 60-ft long prefabricated metal truss bridge
with cast-in-place abutments on spread footings.
BARISTO PARK PROPOSAL | PROJECT SCHEDULE & PAYMENTS 25
Project
Schedule
The total cost of ‘Phase 1: Feasibility and Cost’ and any approved alternates will be done in
monthly installments, according to the following:
• 1ST PAYMENT. After Presentation to Board or at Week 4.
35%
• 2ND PAYMENT. Before Preliminary Submittals or at Week 8.
35%
• 3RD PAYMENT. After Preliminary Submittals or at Week 12.
30%
Payments
Preliminary Studies
Preliminary Sketches
Presentation to Board
Updated to Preliminary Design
Preliminary Submittal to City
Preliminary Submittal to RCFC&WCD
Incorporate Comments & Resubmit
Final Design & Presentation
W1 W2 W3 W4 W5 W6 W7 W8 W9 W10 W11 W12 W13 W4 W15 W16
1st Month 2nd Month 3rd Month 4th Month
BARISTO PARK PROPOSAL
Thank you!
Baristo Neighborhood Organization
A Certified ONE-PS Neighborhood Organization, Palm Springs, CA
Ned Barker, Board Chair Andria Antoine, Communications Officer
Patrick Vincent, Vice Chair Michael Conway, At Large
David Reilly, Treasurer
September 30, 2024
Measure J Oversight Commission, City of Palm Springs CA
Dear Commissioners and Staff,
On behalf of our board, we are grateful for the opportunity to submit our Application for Baristo
Park Improvements. Our Project to improve Baristo Park is expensive and somewhat complex. We
are seeking $537,210 which will fund the Feasibility (Phase 1) and the Design (Phase 2) parts of
this project.
Due to the size and complexity of the Project, we created an RFP, and four companies sent us
LOI’s confirming that they would bid. In the end we had two comprehensive proposals from top-
notch companies. Accompanying this letter are four documents in PDF format:
1. Baristo Park Improvements Measure J Application 09-30-2024
2. Baristo Park Improvements Measure J Application Summary 09-30-2024 (13 slides that
summarize the 60-page Application, for your convenience)
3. Baristo Park Improvements Soleto Proposal Phase 1 2024-09-27 (Sotelo is our selected
bidder; they recently completed the Agua Caliente Cultural Museum landscaping.)
4. Baristo Park Improvements Soleto Proposal Phases 2 and 3 2024-09-27
Our Project qualifies as an “External Project Grant”, and we address project management in the
Application. Phase 3, construction, if we are able to get to that stage, is a way off from now. We
are optimistic. In the meantime, should our Application be accepted, we expect to work closely
with appropriate City departments, and especially with the Parks and Recreation Department.
Thank you in advance for your consideration. We look forward to seeing you tomorrow.
Sincerely,
333 N. Sunrise Way
PO Box 2995 Palm Springs CA 92263
Admin@BaristoPS.com
T (760) 898-9192
https://www.baristops.com/
Baristo Park Improvements
A 2024 Measure J Application SUMMARY
From the Baristo Neighborhood Organization
1
OUR ASK
We are requesting 537,210 to initiate and complete Phases 1 and 2 of our 3 -Phase Project
to make Baristo Park Improvements.
Application Sections 4.7 and 4.8 list detailed line-by-line expenses for both Phases
AMOUNT OUTCOME RECIPIENT
148,800 Phase I (Feasibility including Conceptual Design)Sotelo
15,500 Restroom Feasibility Sotelo
283,850 Phase II (Design) Sotelo
37,500 Restroom Design (if feasible)Sotelo
485,650 SUBTOTAL, Phases 1 & 2
48,560 Contingency, 10%Sotelo
3,000 3 Years of 3rd-party audits of the Baristo NOrg, to
ensure funds from Measure J and other grant
sources are managed correctly.
Baristo
Neighborhood
Organization
537,210 TOTAL, Phases 1 & 2
2
WHAT IS THE BARISTO NEIGHBORHOOD?
Application Section 2.0 details the Neighborhood’s character
3
The core elements of the Baristo
Neighborhood are:
•Its 21 residential developments (14
Condominiums, 7 Apartments)
•Its Section 14 identity
•Its DOWNTOWN to Sunrise location
•Its role in the Palm Springs General Plan’s
Housing Element, as the City’s primary
location for new affordable housing
•Baristo Park
•The Baristo Channel
Tahquitz Canyon
RamonPalm CanyonSunrise Way
WHY ARE BARISTO PARK IMPROVEMENTS NEEDED?
Application Section 2 details these issues, and more
4
The Park’s Main Problem is the BARISTO CHANNEL
•The Channel was built 30 years before the Park – crime and vagrancy
followed the Channel long before the Park existed.
•When Baristo Park opened, February 17, 1981, the Desert Sun headline
was “Former hideout becomes park”.
•The Channel’s design and configuration discourages essential needs of
crime prevention design, including Natural Surveillance, Site Lines,
Natural Access Control, Movement Predictors, Cohesion, Entrapments
and more.
•In short, the Park is not used, as Neighbors feel unsafe.
WHY ARE BARISTO PARK IMPROVEMENTS NEEDED?
Application Section 2 details these issues, and more
5
Additional Issues with the CHANNEL
•Baristo Park’s usability is ONE-HALF of its published 2-acre size
•The main portion of the Park is a giant entrapment area
THE CHANNEL IS AN ESSENTIAL PART OF THE COUNTY’S FLOOD CONTROL PLAN FOR OUR CITY. SO, HOW CAN THIS BE FIXED?
Application Section 5.1.1 details these solutions
6
The Solution to the Channel Problems is to OPEN the Channel
•Add foot bridges to connect both sides of the Park.
•Replace the damaged and ugly cyclone fencing with decorative
fencing only where fencing is necessary.
•Transform the Channel’s maintenance-service paths into open
pedestrian paths.
•Create welcoming entrances.
IF THESE CHANGES ARE OBVIOUS, WHY HAVEN’T THEY BEEN PUT IN PLACE ?
Application Section 5.1.1 details these solutions
7
The Solution to the Channel Problems is complicated,
expensive and yet is well known…and well documented .
•The Parks and Recreation Department’s Current Master Plan (2014)
calls for exactly these changes for exactly the reasons we’ve stated;
(except, they used the term “claustrophobia” instead of
“entrapment”)
•The Section 14 Specific Plan envisions transforming the flood
channels beyond the Park, and into key portions of “an extensively
landscaped pedestrian/bikeway/shuttle network that connects with
the City of Palm Spring General Plan proposed bikeways.” Key to
accomplishing this is “A pedestrian and bicycle system on all
major arterials, along the flood control system.”
WHAT ARE THE IMPROVEMENTS TO THE PARK?
Application Section 5 details both Improvements and Benefits to the Community.8
New Features (to be vetted via Outreach). Examples:
•Upgraded, Updated Landscaping
•Lighting, Cameras
•Safe (and colorful!) pathways through the entire Park
•Wayfinding
•Water feature
•Sense of Entry at both ends of the Park
•Repaired basketball court with bleachers and shade, appropriate landscaping
surrounding the court
•Additional shade in appropriate areas
•Removal of grills (safety)
•Upgraded (working) features, e.g. water fountain
•New (and more) benches, picnic tables
•Art (via Public Arts Commission)
WHAT ARE THE BENEFITS TO THE COMMUNITY?
Application Sections 5.2 and 5.3 detail Benefits to the Community.9
BENEFITS
•The effective or usable size of Baristo Park will double
•With increased use of the Park, the instances of illicit activities will be significantly
reduced
•The Baristo Neighborhood will be more attractive to affordable housing developers
•Creating a connection with Section 14 (example: a sign or monument about
Baristo Sol Santiago (the Park’s namesake) and his accomplishments as an early
20-th century tribal leader)
•Increase the desirability of potential employees and their families to relocated
close to downtown: increase workforce availably
•Additional art
•Set a new bar for park design
•Creation of a “template” for other portions of the Baristo Channel and other such
channels throughout the Valley
•Return on Investment (ROI) for homeowners, landowners, the City and the County
Canal Walks, Phoenix
Grand Canalscape, Phoenix
Perris Valley Trail The Great Wall of Los Angeles
Throughout the County, State & Region, Washes are Being Transformed
CV Link Verdugo Wash Glendale CA Rendering
COMMUNITY OUTREACH
Application Section 3 details the process and results 11
We have addressed / met with these stakeholders, and believe
that we have their support
•Parks & Recreation Commission
•Public Arts Commission
•The Parks Task Force (Mayor Bernstein, Councilmember Holstege, Arts Commission
Chair Armstrong, ONE-PS Chair Ruetz, Assistant City Manager Gallavan, Naomi Soto
and others…)
•Treasurer Mooney
•Councilmember deHarte (Baristo Park & Neighborhood is in his district)
In addition, we canvased every apartment, conducted interviews and gathered feedback.
We created a digital petition and received only support, and many comments.
We conducted additional interviews among Park users.
PROJECT MANAGEMENT, FUNDING SOURCES, PROJECT DURATION
Project Management Section 4.11, Funding Resources Section 6, Duration Section 4.10
12
•PROJECT MGMT. We developed a 20-page RFP that resulted in our
selection of Sotelo Landscape Architects who will perform and manage
design & construction – their detailed proposal was uploaded along
with our Application. Our NOrg will work with stakeholders to ensure
sufficient oversight.
•FUNDING. The requested funding will cover the feasibility and design
phases, to include community engagement. The Application lists
statewide and federal resources that we will pursue to assist with
funding for construction.
•TIMETABLE. Duration for Phase I, feasibility, is projected at 4 months.
We believe that Phases 1 and 2 can be completed in 2025. The
Construction Phase could be completed within 12 months once we
obtain funding.
CONCLUSION
Baristo Park is the only park in the City’s densest Neighborhood, the
Baristo Neighborhood.
The Baristo Neighborhood may also be the most-populated of Palm
Springs’ 52 Neighborhoods.
Baristo Park is the only park within Section 14.
Baristo Park is the only park on downtown’s south side.
Baristo Park is the only park with a Channel running through it.
With the new Measure J funding for Community-Initiated Projects,
now is the time make the Park and the Park experience worthy of its
City’s reputation.
13
Page 1 of 59
An Application for Measure J Funding
for
BARISTO PARK IMPROVEMENTS
PALM SPRINGS CA
SEPTEMBER 30, 2024
BARISTO NEIGHBORHOOD
ORGANIZATION
Page 2 of 59
Table of Contents
[TOC NOTE: THE SECTION BELOW WHICH IS SHADED LIGHT BLUE REFERS TO THE RFP WHICH IS
EMBEDDED WITHIN THIS DOCUMENT]
1 Application Form Information ...................................................................................... 4
2 Introduction and Background ...................................................................................... 6
2.1 Executive Summary ...................................................................................................... 6
2.2 The Link Between the Baristo Channel and Crime ........................................................ 10
2.3 The Baristo Channel and Park Usability ....................................................................... 15
3 Community Outreach ................................................................................................ 18
3.1 Research, Planning and Announcement ...................................................................... 18
3.2 Outreach to the Community’s Infrastructure ............................................................... 20
3.3 Outreach to the Neighborhood .................................................................................... 21
4 Fixing the Channel and Park Usability: PROCESS ......................................................... 24
4.1 Our Process ............................................................................................................... 24
4.2 The Request for Proposal ............................................................................................ 25
Our RFP Process .............................................................................................................. 29
Article I. Introduction ....................................................................................................... 30
Section 1.01 Location and Sponsor ................................................................................. 30
Section 1.02 Management ............................................................................................... 30
Section 1.03 Contact Information .................................................................................... 30
Section 1.04 Background: the Baristo Community .................................................................. 31
Article II. The Project ........................................................................................................ 33
Section 2.01 Mission ............................................................................................................. 33
Section 2.02 Project Specifications: the Improvements .......................................................... 33
Additional Park Improvements ................................................................................................ 34
Section 2.03 Contractor Requirements / Project Deliverables .................................................. 36
Section 2.04 Timeline ...................................................................................................... 37
Article III. The Proposal .............................................................................................. 38
Section 3.01 Summary of Proposal ........................................................................................ 38
Section 3.02 Proposal Details ................................................................................................ 39
(a) Contractor Summary ........................................................................................................... 39
(b) Capabilities and Methodology ............................................................................................. 39
4.3 Inspirational Examples .................................................................................................. 41
Page 3 of 59
Baristo Park ............................................................................................................................. 42
Additional Images .................................................................................................................... 43
4.4 List of Companies that Provided Letters of Intent ......................................................... 45
4.5 Selected Proposal ...................................................................................................... 45
4.6 Estimated Costs ......................................................................................................... 46
4.7 Phase I Feasibility Cost Details ................................................................................... 47
4.8 Phase II – Design and Approvals Cost Details ............................................................... 48
4.9 Phase III – Construction Cost Details [Approximation].................................................. 49
4.10 Project Duration / Timeline .......................................................................................... 50
4.11 Project Management and Oversight ............................................................................. 51
5 The Improvements and Benefits for the Park, the Community and the City .................... 51
5.2 Art in Baristo Park ....................................................................................................... 53
5.3 Baristo Neighborhood Park and Street Names ............................................................. 54
5.4 The Benefits of Baristo Park Improvements, to the Community and to the City .............. 54
6 Potential Funding Resources to Complete Phase III ..................................................... 57
6.1 Potential Statewide and Regional Grant Resources ...................................................... 57
6.2 Potential Federal or National Grant Resources ............................................................ 59
7 Conclusion ............................................................................................................... 59
Page 4 of 59
1 Application Form Information
Measure J Application Form Information
Date Submitted
SEPTEMBER 29, 2024
Project Name
BARISTO PARK IMPROVEMENTS
Project Address
296 South Calle Encilia
Palm Springs CA 92262
Applicant Name
Ned Barker, Board Chair
436 Tan Oak Drive
Palm Springs CA 92262
Applicant's Phone Number
(760) 898-9192
Applicant's Email
admin@baristops.com
Name of Organization (if applicable)
Baristo Neighborhood Organization, a 501(c)(4) organization certified by the Palm Springs Office of
Neighborhoods.
Additional Board Members are:
Patrick Vincent, Vice Chair
David Reilly, Treasurer
Andria Antoine, Communications Officer
Michael Conway, At Large
Applicant Type
O Individual
X Non-Profit Organization
X Neighborhood
O Other Organization
O City Commission
Non-Profit Organization's - Provide Federal Tax ID#
92-2898253
Project Type
Page 5 of 59
O City Implemented Project
X Organizational - Implemented Project (Grant)
Tell us about your project:
l. Does this project improve...? (check all that apply)
□ Business Community
X Downtown Enhancements
□ Educational Services
□ Government Services
□ Health Services
□ Historic Preservation
X Park/Recreation/Hiking Facilities
□ Police/Fire/Emergency Services
X Public Art
□ Streets/Roads
□ Sustainability/Conservation
□ Technology
□ The Economy
□ Tourism
X Other: SAFETY / AFFORDABLE HOUSING
□ Select All
2. What demographic(s) does this project serve? (check all that apply)
□ Animal Welfare
X Children/Students
X Entire Palm Springs Community
X Individuals with Disabilities
X LGBTQ+
X Seniors
X Families and other Residents of Baristo, Tourists & Customers of Arenas District, other nearby
hotels & restaurants
□ Select All
Baristo Neighborhood Organization Board of Directors https://www.BaristoPS.com
Page 6 of 59
Please see our full narrative below, however all of the following topics specifically called out
by Measure J can be quickly accessed via these quick links:
APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS Quick Link
Provide a detailed description of the concept and benefits of your proposal
Baristo Park Improvements to the Park Link
The Benefits of Park Improvements Link
Describe and identify any substantive discussions or endorsements you have
developed with City staff, commissions, or volunteer groups to shape your
proposal and to identify any potential duplication of efforts
Link
Phase I Costs* Link
Phase II Costs Link
Phase III Cost Approximations Link
Designated Project Manager Link
For organizational implemented grants, identify your other funding sources to
complete the project and the percentage of total this represents Link
Project Duration, including lead time to order materials and mobilize
contractors Link
*In order to optimize clarity, we have listed the Commission’s requested costs individually for
each Phase. The Three Phase approach is explained in more detail here.
2 Introduction and Background
2.1 Executive Summary
The core elements of the Baristo Neighborhood are:
• Its 21 residential developments
• Its DOWNTOWN to Sunrise location
• Its Section 14 identity
• Its role in the Palm Springs General Plan’s Housing Element, as the City’s primary location
for new affordable housing
• Baristo Park
• The Baristo Channel
2.1.1 The Baristo Neighborhood
The Baristo Neighborhood is unique among Palm Springs Neighborhoods.
Page 7 of 59
• We are likely the largest of all 52 ONE-PS Neighborhoods by population. We have 21
community developments, and zero free-standing homes outside of those developments. 7
of our communities are apartment complexes, and the other 14 are condominium
developments. We estimate that our residents make up between 5 and 6 percent of the city's
population.
• Baristo is a highly diverse Neighborhood, with hundreds of rented apartment homes, and
with condominium homes from the low 6-figures to the low 7-figures. Our residents consist
of retirees, active Boomers, Gen-X, Millennials, Gen-Z, and young families.
Figure 2.1.1 Baristo is Bordered by S. Palm Canyon (west), Sunrise Way (east), Tahquitz Canyon (north) and Ramon
(south)
• Until 2018, renters were excluded from Palm Springs’ Neighborhood Organizations. We
have made a concerted effort to involve the apartment residents of our Neighborhood. We
have worked to engage our rental residents, but these residents tend to be extremely busy
earning income and taking care of families.
Earlier this year we were privileged to have
Andria Antoine join our board. She
manages an apartment complex in our
Neighborhood and two others within the
City. Park usability and fear of crime are
important issues to everyone, and perhaps
most important to our renters.
• Three of the apartment complexes are adjacent to Baristo Park . Two others are a very short
walk away.
• Located in the center of Palm Springs, our Neighborhood comprises exactly one -half of
Section 14. The other half, “Midtown”, is primarily commercial with fewer than half of
Baristo’s number of residential communities.
Figure 2.1.1-A From the Current HOUSING ELEMENT
Page 8 of 59
• The City’s plan for housing, the Housing Element, projects that most of the City’s
affordable / workforce housing in the next 8 years will be developed within Baristo.
• The City’s affordable housing plan for the next several years has “cleared” 17 potential
locations for new affordable housing. TEN OF THESE ARE WITHIN THE BARISTO
NEIGHBORHOOD, AND
ARE WITHIN WALKING
DISTANCE OF THE PARK!
• The graphic below was
prepared by David Newell
who presented at the
Baristo annual meeting in
March [Park location arrow
added for this document].
All of this leads to the importance
of Baristo Park, more importantly
to the usage of the Park. The Board
has found that creating social
events for the residents of
individual communities, all of
which have physical-visual barriers, is a great challenge.
“If Baristo Park is the Neighborhood’s heart, it will take EVENTS to make its heart beat.”
2.1.2 Section 14
The Baristo Neighborhood is one-half of Section 14. Many tribal members live within and / or own
homes within the Baristo Neighborhood.
The monument pictured here is located in the Neighborhood at the
corner of Sunrise Way and Ramon, the southeast corner of Section 14.
The Desert Sun Reported that “Section 14 is very important to the tribal
members because it's where the Sek-hi — boiling mineral water —
springs from the ground. It is the ground on which the first bathhouse
was located and is considered the birthplace of the Coachella Valley's
tourism industry.”
A renewed public interest in Section 14 has evolved over the last ten
or so years. Its story is now known all over the world. The New York
Times published a comprehensive and elaborately illustrated article
about Section 14 on May 21 of this year. It was entitled: Their Palm
Springs Neighborhood Burned More Than 50 Years Ago. They Want
Compensation.
Figure 2.1.1-B TEN of the City's 17 Proposed Locations for Affordable
Housing are walking Distance from Baristo Park
Page 9 of 59
This is an important and controversial topic, and our NOrg, as per our Bylaws, does not take an
official position on these issues. However, the Board believes that the City, as the steward of this
sacred land, should support efforts to honor tribal history and recognize its role in our Neighborhood.
How does this relate to the Baristo Park Improvements Project? We share some specific thoughts
below, in our Public Arts Section.
2.1.2.1 The Section 14 Specific Plan
The City and the Agua Caliente Tribe of Cahuilla Indians worked together to create the “Section 14
Specific Plan”. The Plan was approved by City Council in July of 2014, ironically the same year that
the Parks and Recreation Master Plan was approved and released. BOTH Plans call for pedestrian
use along flood channels!
The Section 14 Specific Plan envisioned the transforming the flood channels into key portions of “an
extensively landscaped pedestrian/bikeway/shuttle network that connects with the City of Palm
Spring General Plan proposed bikeways.”1
Key to accomplishing this is “A pedestrian and bicycle system on all major arterials, along the
flood control system.”2
2.1.3 The Baristo Channel
The Baristo Channel is at the heart of this Application. No other City park has a flood channel running
through it. While additional improvements are called for in order to optimize the park’s usability, no
single factor is more in need of improvements than the Baristo Channel. We address the details of
this problem, as well as the solutions, later in this Application. NOTE: we have no recommendations,
nor would RivCo Flood Control accept any, that could hinder the functionality of the Channel.
The Baristo Channel was developed 75 years ago, decades prior to anyone envisioning a park in the
area. The bridges over South Calle Encilia and El Segundo came many years later.
Over the years internal improvements and extensions have been added. In 1962, up-to-date plans
did not exist, so an extensive set of “as built” plans was developed. There is a two-page update for
some changes made in 2002.
When Baristo Park was built, it was “sculpted” around the Channel, which runs 547 feet through the
Park, slicing it into two unequal portions.
1 “Chapter 4: Features of the Specific Plan”
2 Ibid.
Page 10 of 59
Figure 2.1.3 A Portion of the 1962 As Built Channel Plans
2.1.4 Baristo Park
Baristo Park opened to moderate fanfare (the Desert Sun covered it) in February of 1981. The land
had been purchased in the mid-seventies for this purpose, but bureaucracy and funding sources
took a while to navigate.
Surprisingly, the rationale for building the Park was crime: City leaders believed that a park could
help reduce or eliminate the illicit activity that surrounded the Channel. These and other relevant
facts are explored and documented in the section that follows, “The Link Between the Baristo
Channel and Crime”.
2.2 The Link Between the Baristo Channel and Crime
2.2.1 Park Design is the Problem
Baristo Park, surrounded by families in apartment complexes, is the only greenspace for
the City’s densest Neighborhood, Baristo. The Park is underutilized and continues to attract
illicit activity. The problem has persisted for decades. Why?
Significant police and City responsiveness to complaints and petitions have borne results in
the short term. The underlying problem, however, goes back to the 70’s if not further. It is
rooted in the DESIGN of the Park.
Baristo Park was developed in the mid-seventies, and opened in early 1981. The Baristo
Channel, however, had already existed for about 30 years. In fact, Baristo Park was actually
conceived as a solution to the vagrancy and other illicit activities carried on around the
Channel.
We, the Baristo Neighborhood Organization, contend that the enclosed Channel, which
effectively closes a large portion of the Park on three sides, is the underlying problem
at Baristo Park. It is detrimental to the Park in numerous ways:
• It makes the small Park even smaller.
Page 11 of 59
• It provides spaces in which someone contemplating illicit activity can hide.
• It prevents pedestrians from walking from one end of the Park to the other.
• The fencing conjures up the image of a prison.
• The claustrophobic feeling discourages Park use. It feels unsafe.
How do we solve this without impacting the Channel’s function? The City’s Parks &
Recreation Master Plan calls for connecting or “bridging” the two sides of the Channel. But
there is more to consider, and by using the research and techniques associated with Crime
Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED), we can better understand exactly
what should be done. Recent significant enhancements to flood channels throughout the
County (CV Link, Perris Valley Trail) support this point.
Opening the Baristo Channel, and transforming it into a visual and functional asset, will
naturally encourage Park use. This in turn discourages illicit activity.
2.2.2 Why is this important to the city and to the Baristo neighborhood?
Residents, families, and children deserve a safe and usable space for recreational activities, picnics,
and community gatherings. Equally important is the Park’s overall attractiveness as well as
unrestricted access to and from its west and south sides.
Our Neighbors reside in 21 residential developments, 7 of which are apartment complexes. Many
restaurants, shops, and hotels, including the Arenas District, are close to the Park.
The City itself has targeted the Baristo Neighborhood for the majority of its new affordable and
workforce housing developments to meet its State mandated responsibilities. Baristo is ideal for
this development due to its infrastructure and proximity to downtown jobs. Yet this bisected,
challenged Park is Baristo’s only greenspace.
2.2.3 Park-Related Principles of (CPTED)3
What is CPTED? CPTED is an acronym for CRIME PREVENTION THROUGH ENVIRONMENTAL
DESIGN4. Around the world, CPTED principles are used in the design and improvements of parks. An
article in the National Recreation and Park Association’s magazine details the issues. Using Design
to Reduce Crime | Feature | Parks and Recreation Magazine | NRPA. Baristo Park “fails” several core
CPTED principles, mostly because of the Baristo Channel:
Natural Surveillance—This refers to designing areas where park users and their activities can be
regularly observed. Law enforcement and other users can easily have eyes on the park space. This
helps deter criminal activity.
Natural Surveillance in Baristo Park. The double-layer of fencing surrounding the channel
diminishes the Park’s natural surveillance. The area inside the channel fencing is a great
place to hide. The chain link fencing, as evidenced by numerous breaks, is easy to breach.
3 CPTED is pronounced SEP-TED
4 For additional information see: The International CPTED Association (ICA) - Primer in CPTED - What is CPTED?
Page 12 of 59
Natural Access Control—Controlling access to a site by clearly defining park entranceways and
exits. Signage, monument signs, pathways with lighting are methods that can help create a natural
flow. Celebrating a park entry(s) with an arch marks it as a primary means of ingress and egress. It
feels safe. Parks must be safe, but also, parks must FEEL SAFE.
Natural Access Control in Baristo Park. The Park is basically walled or fenced in on three
of its four sides, with two sides enclosed because of the Channel. It is a giant entrapment
area! There is no Park entry. The address of the Park, its natural entry, is 296 S. Calle Encilia,
the corner of Encilia and Saturnino. There is no Park access point within 500 feet of this
address, unless one considers the “dirt entry” down a bit on Encilia, where someone has
removed the gate. At the El Segundo end there is a concrete marker that says “Baristo Park”,
mostly hidden by its landscaping, and unconnected to any pathways.
Image—A park that is attractive and maintained adds to the feeling that it’s safe, that people care,
that the city cares. A park that is not maintained may be perceived as unsafe.
Baristo Park Image. The perennially broken fence, coupled with the look of the channel,
reminds one of a prison. The Channel often contains debris. Some of the debris, such as
mattresses and trash cans, is clearly dumped there. Normal park features remain unrepaired
or have not been updated for years. The Channel didn’t directly cause features to break, but
such failures occur when features are abused, often in the course of conducting illicit
activities.
Movement Predictors—Walkways, paths and trails can be significant deterrents to crime, or they
can place pedestrians at risk. Examples of positive Movement Predictors include well -lit pathways,
effective wayfinding, good site lines to the paths, and ample options for access or egress. Movement
Predictors without these features might allow a pedestrian to be entrapped, or allow potential
criminals places to hide.
Baristo Park Movement Predictors. Baristo Park does not have a single walkway from one
end to the other. This is because of the current Channel configuration, which does not allow
for access at its westernmost end, except when citizens remove the gate. Where there is no
pathway, there is no lighting.
Cohesion—Bringing neighbors together in ways that enhance their relationships and in so doing,
enhance the neighborhood, is a core element of cohesion. This might include neighborhood
activities, special events, celebrations, even competitions, or just simple gatherings. It might include
forming a Neighborhood Watch program, or perhaps a softball team.
The Park's Main Area, Surrounded by Fencing, is an Entrapment Area
Page 13 of 59
Cohesion in the Baristo Neighborhood. The Baristo Neighborhood consists of 21 separate
residential developments. There are no homes outside of the 21 developments. A safe park
with open and usable spaces, and access on all sides, can help us bring neighbors together.
Over the years, some improvements have been made. Recent improvements include new shade
structures and some landscaping. But crime and vagrancy remain, while park use remains low. One
item remains unchanged throughout: the Baristo Channel. The Parks & Recreation Current
Master Plan, nearly ten years old, acknowledges that the Channel is the real problem for Baristo
Park:
“The small park is made even smaller by the concrete-lined canal that bisects it…The
park is accessed primarily from the east end, making it feel somewhat
claustrophobic to enter. Bridging the canal to connect the two parts of this park would
improve its connection to the neighborhood west of it and to downtown. It is possible
that opening the park for better access as described above would lower the
vandalism and other undesired activities by encouraging more through-traffic and
use of the park, resulting in more “eyes on the park”.
2.2.4 The solution: open up the channel, create an open park
Open up the Channel!
• Add foot bridges to connect both sides of the Park.
• Replace the damaged and ugly cyclone fencing with decorative fencing where fencing is
necessary.
• Transform the Channel’s maintenance-service paths into open pedestrian paths.
• Create a welcoming main entrance.
An open park with park users and pedestrians is unattractive to criminals and vagrants who
prefer hidey-holes and privacy to conduct their “business”. Precedents for the above
recommendations include the CV Link and the Perris Valley Trail. A nearby precedent for allowing
the maintenance paths to double as pedestrian paths, exists just off S. Indian Canyon Drive, where
pedestrian access to the Channel is unencumbered.
Page 14 of 59
2.2.5 History of The Baristo Channel and Baristo Park
Source: Desert Sun Archives
Desert Sun
Issue
Comments Article Content
September 21,
1948
Headline “Work on Baristo Flood Channel Starts This Fall.”
December 31,
1948
Headline “Flood Work Right of Way Is Approved”
July 28, 1976 It was always known
that the Channel would
be the park’s dominant
feature.
“the local citizens committee chose several other projects
for implementation…and acquisition of land for a park in
the Baristo Channel.”
October 13,
1978
Interview with nearby
resident 3 years prior
to opening the Park.
“Mrs. Allen [a neighbor] said the Palm Springs Police
Department told her the lot has one of the highest
vagrancy rales in the city because people can conceal
themselves in the brush and under trees.”
February 27,
1981
Park opening day:
Desert Sun Headline.
“Former hideout becomes park”.
February 27,
1981
Acknowledgement that
the Park’s purpose was
to reduce crime at the
Baristo Channel.
“What was once a hideout for transients and a debris-
filled vacant lot has been put to use as the city's newest
mini park”.
October 26,
2021
2007 - 2021 “Palm Springs Police Department officers have gone to
Baristo Park 2,673 times since 2007, according to Sgt.
Mike Casavan.”
October 26,
2021
Forty Years Later… “The City of Palm Springs announced Tuesday it will
temporarily close Baristo Park for several weeks in order to
address public health and homeless issues and unsafe
activities that have taken place.”
SOURCE: 2022-
2024, per City
FOIA Request
for crime data at
Baristo and Ruth
Hardy Parks
Most recent 2 years
(after homeless
services ceased on
Encilia).
Police responses to the Park and crimes in the Park
decreased significantly due to improvements / repairs made
in 2021 and relocating the homeless services facility.
However, the crime rate in Baristo Park “per acre”,
compared to Ruth Hardy, is four times higher, eight times
higher if we consider only Baristo Park’s useable space. Why
compare to Ruth Hardy? Ruth Hardy Park is wide open,
easily accessed, pedestrian-friendly, full-featured and
well-used.
Baristo Park can be modified to have these same qualities
and features. See Figure 2.2.5 for more detail.
Page 15 of 59
Figure 2.2.5 This compares Ruth Hardy’s 22 acres to Baristo Park’s “official” 2 acres, but Baristo Park has only one
usable acre.
2.3 The Baristo Channel and Park Usability
2.3.1 Baristo Park’s Usability is ONE-HALF of its 2-Acre Published Size
The Baristo Channel consumes nearly one-third of Baristo Park’s two acres. As detailed in the
graphic below, figure 2.3.1, the Channel is approximately 547 feet in length, and 51 feet in width.
This is nearly two-thirds of one acre, or one-third of the Park’s published two-acre size.5
5 Throughout this Application, pictures of Baristo Park, unless otherwise indicated, are taken from the most
current Google Earth depiction. Our own estimate, based on construction status of the nearby DRIFT Hotel, is
2022.
Baristo Park Ruth Hardy Park
Size (Acres)2 22
Report Beginning Date 9/1/2022 9/1/2022
Report Ending Date 8/31/2024 8/31/2024
Number of Weeks in Report 104 104
Reports Run Date 9/4/2024 9/4/2024
PSPD Calls to Park Address 70 715
PSPD Calls per Week 0.7 6.9
PSPD Calls per Acre 35.0 32.5
CRIMES Committed 8.0 24.0
Crimes per Week 0.08 0.23
Crimes per Acre 4 1
Park is OPEN No Yes
Park has facilities to promote USAGE No (basketball court
only)
Yes (restrooms, tennis courts,
pickleball courts, grandstands,
citywide events, parking,
wellness park, etc.)
Park has a lot of USAGE No Yes
Park is bisected by fences / channel Yes No
Park is fenced in on 3 sides Yes No
Crime Comparison Baristo Park vs. Ruth Hardy Park
Last 24 Months Sept. 2022 - Aug. 2024
PARK DIFFERENCES
NOTE: the Calls and Crimes per Acre at Baristo Park DOUBLE if one considers only its
useable single acre. PSPD 70 calls per acre, 8 crimes per acre.
Page 16 of 59
The main problem with the Park is the Baristo Channel
Figure 2.3.1
Figure 2.3.1-A below details the estimated square footage of the Park’s bisected corner. This section
is not useable for an event or gathering of any kind, as it is totally unconnected to the main body of
the Park. When one approaches the Park from South Calle Encilia (this is the Park’s “official” street
address), one must walk about 500 feet to actually enter the Park.
The bisected section accounts for one-sixth of one acre. See Figure 2.3.1-A below.
25 feet, width of concrete portion of Channel (per Sotelo)
12 feet, width of each side of Channel (Maintenance Path)
12 feet, width of each side of Channel (Maintenance Path)
2 feet, unusable
51 Total width of channel
547 feet, length of channel per Google Maps
51 feet, width of Channel
547 feet, length of Channel
27,897 square feet, total Channel surface
43,560 square feet in 1 acre
2 acres, total size of Baristo Park
64.0%Channel square footage is equal to 64% of 1 acre
32.0%Channel consumes nearly ONE-THIRD of total Park space
CHANNEL SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATION
BARISTO CHANNEL CONSUMES ONE-THIRD OF BARISTO PARK'S TWO ACRES
CHANNEL WIDTH CALCULATION
CHANNEL LENGTH
Page 17 of 59
Figure 2.3.1-A
Taken together, without the ability to use the one-third of the Park space due to the Channel, and
another one-sixth of the Park space due to the bif urcation of the Park, the effective size of the Park
is only one-half of its published two-acre size: 1/3 (2/6) + 1/6 = 3/6 = 1/2.
Actually, the usable space is even less, as the northwest corner of the Park is nothing more than an
abundance of loose dirt.
280 Triangle, Side 1
260 Triangle, Side 2
127 Triangle, Side 3
667 Total of three sides of Bisected Triangle
280 Triangle, Side 1
260 Triangle, Side 2
127 Triangle, Side 3
16,456 Square feet of Triangle
43,560 square feet in 1 acre
2 acres, total size of Baristo Park
37.8%Bisected Triangle square footage is equal to 37.8% of 1 acre
18.9%Bisected Triangle consumes nearly ONE-SIXTH of total Park space
BARISTO CHANNEL CONSUMES ONE-THIRD OF BARISTO PARK'S TWO ACRES
BISECTED TRIANGLE CALCULATION
BISECTED SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATION
Page 18 of 59
Figure 2.3.1-B
Figure 2.3.1-C The “Loose Dirt” Section
3 Community Outreach
Shortly after learning about a potential new community-initiated Measure J funding via a ONE-PS
meeting, the board began to discuss possible Neighborhood projects, but soon leaned strongly
toward improving the Park. We had discussed the Park’s channel on many occasions over the prior
year and a half, but we realized that it would be expensive and complicated. Now, with Measure J,
there was an opportunity.
3.1 Research, Planning and Announcement
3.1.1 Research
Our research included:
Page 19 of 59
• Board member “surveys” of the Park, occasional informal board meetups at the Park
• Review of the Parks & Recreation Master Plan (2014)
• Attending 2024 Parks & Recreation Master Plan development meetings
• Review of the Section 14 Specific Plan
• Review of Desert Sun articles going back to 1948
• LOTS of website searching via Google, focused on flood channels that were transformed into
pedestrian walkways
• Parks & Recreation Commission presentations and videos
• FOIA requests for police and fire department responses to Baristo Park, and to Ruth Hardy
Park – we wanted to compare the enclosed and infrequently used Baristo Park with the wide-
open and oft-used Ruth Hardy Park
• Other documents we have requested and received include:
o Riverside County sample encroachment permit
o Riverside County sample letter of understanding with Perris
o Riverside County Flood Control As-Built Plans for the Baristo Channel
In-person outreach turned out to be a critical part of research. We “cold called” a Riverside County
Flood Control Commission member. At the time, we were simply trying to confirm that the Baristo
Channel was indeed controlled by Riverside County. The Commission member was very helpful, and
very supportive of our intentions to open the Channel, and especially liked the idea of adding murals
to a portion of the Channel. They also liked the idea of transforming the Channel into a functional
and attractive asset for the City.
That call led to a connection with Andrew Leung, PE, Project Planning Section | Engineering Project
Manager, Riverside County Flood Control And Water Conservation District. Mr. Leung arranged to
two Flood Control engineers to meet with us at Baristo Park. Two days later! It turned out that the
engineers would be in Palm Springs to evaluate Encroachment Permit compliance for the CV Link
area beginning at Vista Chino.
Meeting the engineers at the Park turned into a serious educational opportunity for us. In short, we
were schooled on what was possible and what was not possible, regarding the Channel and the
County.
Four of our five board members accompanied the engineers on June 11 taking notes, as we began to
understand that this would indeed be a complex and challenging project. But the engineers were
positive, and they encouraged us. They explained how similar objectives were achieved at much
larger venues, including the Perris Valley Trail and the aforementioned CV Link.
3.1.2 Planning
Board members had several discussions regarding how to go about presenting such a complex and
potentially expensive plan to the Measure J. Commission. We knew that our own estimates of cost
would not be taken seriously.
We eventually developed the RFP-Proposal process as a solution. We expound on this process in
Section 4.
Page 20 of 59
3.1.3 Announcement
The Board formally introduced the Park Project to the Neighborhood at its Zoom meeting on June 8.
Meeting attendees were supportive. And of course the meeting content was documented in our
meeting minutes as well as our meeting video, both posted on our website .
3.2 Outreach to the Community’s Infrastructure
3.2.1 Parks & Recreation Commission
We were unable to secure a spot on the Commission’s June 24 agenda, so we opted to use the Public
Comments section and explain our case for three minutes. Prior to this, with the helpful assistance
of Rylee Bates, we developed and provided a cover letter with handouts a few days prior to the
presentation date.
On September 12 two board members had a very productive and helpful 45-minute phone
conversation with the Department’s Acting Director , Lauri Aylaian. This call permitted us to explain
our Project, and it set up the requirements to participate in the meeting on the 23rd.
On September 23 we were given 5 minutes to again state our case to the Commission. We had
submitted handouts a week in advance along with an unfinished version of the Measure J Application
as requested. The Commission evaluated all seven of the presentations given on the 23rd, and the
Baristo Park Improvements Project was found to rank (tied for) #2 , and to therefore receive an
endorsement for Measure J funding.
3.2.2 Public Arts Commission
On August 8 we presented to the Public Arts Commission. As we were listed on the agenda, we were
able to ask and answer questions, a most helpful process. The Commission was very supportive of
our Project, as art is key to a revived Baristo Park.
In fact, they were so supportive that they asked us to appoint a liaison from the Neighborhood to
work with the Commission on Baristo Park artwork. It so happens that one of our board members
has extensive experience as an art curator, and was therefore appointed. Public Arts Commission
Chair Gary Armstrong attended our September 21 board meeting, and informed us that Baristo Park
had been selected to receive a sculpture as part of the Commission’s ARTSCAPE IN THE PARKS
program!
3.2.3 Parks Task Force
Mr. Armstrong invited two of the board members to join the upcoming Parks Task Force on
September 25. We prepared a few handouts for the presentation. Our esteemed audience included
Mayor Bernstein, Councilmember Holstege, Assistant City Manager Gallavan, ONE-PS Chair Chris
Ruetz, J.R. Roberts, Naomi Soto, Gary Armstrong, and others. The attendees were positively
enthusiastic about the Baristo Park Improvements Project.
Page 21 of 59
3.2.4 Councilmember and Mayor Pro Tem Ron deHarte
On September 26 Baristo NOrg Board Chair Barker had a one-on-one meeting with Councilmember
and Mayor Pro Tem deHarte, who is very supportive of the Project, and was especially enthusiastic
about our outreach efforts.
3.2.5 City Treasurer Kris Mooney
On September 4 two board members had a conference call with City Treasurer Mooney. We were
concerned about our “three phase” approach to the Project, as well as about a cost that we knew
would exceed the Commission’s state limit. Mr. Mooney encouraged us to move forward with our
plan.
3.3 Outreach to the Neighborhood
Part of our plan was to run a membership “campaign” for support during the final week prior to the
submission of the Application. We kicked this off at our September 21 Board Meetings, and then
followed up with several group emails. To that end we developed a digital petition, in English and in
Spanish, to allow Members to express support.
We created a flyer in English and Spanish, with QR Codes linking to the digital petition. The digital
petitions were also shown as new tabs our our website, baristops.com.
Our current resident Membership email database lists 83 valid residential email addresses.
• We had 37 “YES” answers to: “I Support the Application for Measure J Funds to Improve
Baristo Park”
• We had ZERO “NO” answers
• We had at least one response from 7 of the 14 Condominium developments
• We had responses and comments from 6 of the 7 Apartment developments
• Two business owners within the Neighborhood were among the respondents
3.3.1 RESIDENT COMMENTS VIA DIGITAL PETITION
Comments on the Survey were optional. Here are all of them:
• Baristo Park has improved tremendously in the past two years or so, and I strongly support
even more improvements to make the park a great place for everyone to enjoy. My home has
a view of the park and, when the weather is cooler and my windows are open, I can hear
activities at the park. It's much nicer now and we can continue to make it even better.
• Needs improvement asap
• Requesting a nice area for us residents and for our pets. Encourage exercise and healthy life
style.
• Can’t wait to hear more - we are so excited about this initiative!
• Hope this goes gets approved.
• My dog and I love this park.
Page 22 of 59
• Please upgrade park! We desperately need it!
• So excited
• Sooo excited!
• one hundred support Measure J
• This area needs to continue to be improved and become a safe family area instead of a
wasteland for the homeless. [Business Owner]
• I love the idea of a splash pad for my son. It would be nice to have a small, fenced area for
dogs also.
• Looking forward to a safe refreshed park
• There's a unique opportunity to create a message that sets us apart from other cities. An
opportunity to show that the city values quality of like and the importance of environment and
restate the importance of place. We must continue to take pride and take the lead in this
world class city. [Business Owner]
3.3.2 Canvasing the Apartments
Per Section 2.1.1., our Neighborhood is likely to have more new affordable housing added than any
other neighborhood in the City:
Board members canvassed all seven of the apartment developments in the Baristo Neighborhood.
We spoke with managers at each one. Six of the seven were very supportive. The one that couldn’t
comment stated that they would have to check with their corporate offices before supporting any
initiatives, although they did agree to post our flyer with the QR codes. However, that particular
development is the furthest of all from the Park; the other six are
3.3.2.1 Pacific Palms
Pacific Palms is directly south of the Park, residents cross Saturnino to access it. The manager stated
that “all of the improvements are good for our residents.”
3.3.2.2 Rancheria Del Sol
Former Manager: “I don’t think our residents go there because it's scary and seems unsafe.”
New manager: “Consider including some playground equipment that works for people with impaired
sensory motor skills. She recommends a swing set with one swing adapted for children in
wheelchairs." There were 4 office employees when we visited, and all seemed excited about this
and would share with the residents.”
Page 23 of 59
3.3.2.3 La Ventana
La Ventana is across the street from the Park. At La Ventana we interviewed the Maintenance
Engineer, as their Community Engineer was out of the office. The Engineer, also a resident of La
Ventana, use the Park with his young son who enjoys the playground. He was excited to hear of the
Park’s potential renovation, and commented in his petition that “I love the idea of a splash pad for
my son. It would be nice to have a small, fenced area for dogs also ”. After we left, he debriefed the
manager who also signed the digital petition and commented: “Hope this goes gets approved.”
3.3.2.4 Latitude 33
The new manager at Latitude 33 stated that ““The Team at Latitude 33 is excited to hear about the
Park, we feel it will be a great improvement for the neighborhood and for the residents and
neighbors.”
3.3.2.5 San Jacinto Racquet Club
Manager “I’m an exercise guy. When I’ve taken my son there I’d like a small track to run on, or some
other exercise or wellness equipment.” He was excited about all of this and said he would post the
flyer in the community laundry room.
3.3.2.6 The Gallery
The manager stated that she had “to check with the corporate offices.” But then after talking to her
and the assistant we believe they will give feedback, and they also promised to post the sign by the
community mail or laundry.
3.3.2.7 The Modern Cactus
Regional Manager for multiple apartments, including The Modern Cactus. (Disclosure: she is also a
NOrg board member.) “Aesthetically this park needs a lot of work - It's view is off putting and feels
very dangerous at times. There are also safety concerns and fencing that need attention. As a resort
and vacation destination - especially given this is in a neighborhood in/near downtown, Palm Springs
should make all proposed improvements so the community can enjoy this outdoor area.”
3.3.3 Random Interviews at the Park
Lunchtime, Park interview. Two thirty-ish male residents from Pacific Palms were sitting in the park
and talking around lunchtime. I approached them and they were interested in what was being done
with the park although they hadn’t heard about the Project. They were concerned that the Park felt
unsafe, and they were most concerned about people using the grills in the park for illicit purposes
such as drug use. They were delighted to learn that we have asked as part of our Project to have the
grills removed. This was lunchtime in the park.
Park Interview, early afternoon. A young mother and her 3-year-old daughter visit the Park often as
her daughter loves the playground. They live at Pacific Palms. Unfortunately her favorite part of the
playground, the slide, was too dirty to use on this day. She loves the park improvements, especially
the idea of a splash pad. She fears the homeless, has discovered human feces and needles in the
park on some previous visits. She brought up homeless “cooking” drugs on grills, while we stood
there and watch a homeless person cooking “something” on one of the grills. The mother recalled
an experience in the Park when she heard a small explosion while someone was cooking something,
Page 24 of 59
perhaps meth? She was relieved to hear that the renovation recommendations propose to eliminate
all grills for exactly this reason.
An early evening event hosted by (and at) Latitude 33. A mother with young children. She is afraid to
go into park, but would love a splash pad and would love having Park improvements made.
An early morning interview on an August weekday. Basketball Court. A 50-ish man was using the
basketball court. He stated that he’s used the Park for basketball for 20 years. He did not offer
information regarding his residence. He did say that he lives in the area. He cautioned that we should
be sure to use rubberized coating on the basketball court surface when we repair and refinish it. He
called attention to his biggest concern, that the sprinklers water the court thus making sections of it
unusable.
Unsolicited email, Village Racquet Club:
Hi Ned, I walk past Baristo Park at least once a week but haven’t paid much attention to it since it
was leaned up.
Today I actually walked through it. My sense is that very little of the park is on the south side of the
fences. There are bubblers in the ground over there adjacent to the sidewalk which probably will feed
new desert plants. I didn’t see any evidence of sprinklers that would suggest the planting of new
grass.
The fences are incredibly unattractive so replacing them with attractive barriers would definitely
help. At least one bridge (e.g. in the halfway point between east and west ends of the area) would
make the park more accessible to people parking their cars on Saturnino.
Baristo Park continues to be, in my opinion, rather creepy.
Thanks to you and the board members for all the great accomplishments.
4 Fixing the Channel and Park Usability: PROCESS
4.1 Our Process
The process for fixing the Channel and optimizing the Park’s usability is complex. We are not
qualified to design a solution to the Park. Nor are we sufficiently expert to prove that the project is
feasible6. Let alone how much it would cost. Our Board members have varied skills, with
backgrounds in business, government, education and the arts. Some of us have experience
preparing RFP’s. Creating an RFP helped address the complexity of the Project. Next we divided the
Project itself into three phases.
6 However, one of our earliest actions was to invite RivCo Flood Control Engineers to walk Baristo Channel with
us. They did. Four of us, Board members, left the meeting believing that the project was indeed feasible.
Page 25 of 59
4.1.1 Three Phases
The first phase is a consulting contract whereby we require a feasibility study. We knew that the
Commission could, and likely would, require us to demonstrate feasibility , since the precedents for
this type of project are different (mostly much larger than) the Baristo Channel.
We also realize that it would be inappropriate to ask for design and construction funding without
being able to demonstrate feasibility.
Phase I is essentially a consulting contract, developed to include feasibility for the Project as well
as a conceptual design which will show what the outcome of these changes might look like.
We also required an estimated cost for Phase II (design) and Phase III (construction).
4.2 The Request for Proposal
Upon advice of the RivCo Flood Control engineers, we looked for companies that met three criteria
for this Project:
1. Landscape architect capabilities
2. Experience working with RivCo Flood Control, or a business relationship with a firm that
meets this requirement
3. Experience with parks
The RFP follows. It was sent to five companies. Four of them responded with Letters of Intent to
submit a proposal. However, two companies actual provided a Proposal: Alta Planning + Design
(office in San Diego) and Sotelo Landscape Architects (based in San Diego).
Please note that we have opted to highlight the RFP for reading clarity by providing a light peach
background for the document, as it is embedded within the Application. We thought that the RFP
should be embedded within the Application, as the selected Proposal is also be embedded within
the Application.
Proposals were due by September 23, 2024, and both companies met this deadline.
If desired, select this link to SKIP RFP AND GO TO NEXT SECTION.
Page 26 of 59
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL
BARISTO PARK IMPROVEMENTS
PALM SPRINGS CA
BARISTO NEIGHBORHOOD
ORGANIZATION
Page 27 of 59
Contents
Our RFP Process .............................................................................................................. 29
Article I. Introduction ....................................................................................................... 30
Section 1.01 Location and Sponsor ........................................................................................ 30
Section 1.02 Management ..................................................................................................... 30
Section 1.03 Contact Information........................................................................................... 30
Section 1.04 Background: the Baristo Community .................................................................. 31
PARK USAGE ...................................................................................................................... 32
SAFETY ............................................................................................................................... 32
PARK SERVICES .................................................................................................................. 33
RECREATION ...................................................................................................................... 33
BEAUTIFICATION ................................................................................................................ 33
Article II. The Project ........................................................................................................ 33
Section 2.01 Mission ............................................................................................................. 33
Section 2.02 Project Specifications: the Improvements .......................................................... 33
IMPROVEMENTS RELATED TO BARISTO FLOOD CONTROL CHANNEL .................................. 33
Additional Park Improvements ................................................................................................ 34
ESSENTIAL PARK FEATURES ................................................................................................ 34
LANDSCAPING ................................................................................................................... 35
LIGHTING ........................................................................................................................... 35
CROSSWALKS .................................................................................................................... 35
ART..................................................................................................................................... 35
Section 2.03 Contractor Requirements / Project Deliverables .................................................. 36
PROJECT DELIVERABLES..................................................................................................... 36
Section 2.04 Timeline ............................................................................................................ 37
Article III. The Proposal .................................................................................................... 38
Section 3.01 Summary of Proposal ........................................................................................ 38
(a) Expectations ................................................................................................................. 38
(b) Response Deadline ....................................................................................................... 38
(c) Proposal Deadline ......................................................................................................... 38
(d) Selection Criteria........................................................................................................... 38
Page 28 of 59
Proposal Format ................................................................................................................. 38
Section 3.02 Proposal Details .......................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined.
(a) Contractor Summary ........................................................................................................ 39
(b) Capabilities and Methodology ........................................................................................... 39
IMAGES ............................................................................................................................ 41
Inspirational Examples ........................................................................................................... 41
Baristo Park ............................................................................................................................ 42
Additional Images ................................................................................................................... 43
Page 29 of 59
Our RFP Process
This RFP is submitted by a Palm Springs neighborhood organization, the Baristo Neighborhood
Organization. We are incorporated as a 501(C)(4), and are certified by the City of Palm Sprins Office
of Neighborhoods.
We intend to fund the Project through the City of Palm Springs via its Measure J Community
Initiated Projects grant program. This program allows for individual projects of up to $500,000
(exceptions may be made by the City Council), and the recently announced total planned allocation
is $6+ Million.
The Community Initiated funding was announced in June, and our Application is due September
30, 2024. The selected Proposal in response to this RFP will be submitted as part of our application.
Decisions will be announced by the Measure J Commission on or before January 31, 2025.
More information is available at the City’s Measure J website. Measure J Community Initiated Projects
| City of Palm Springs (palmspringsca.gov).
Due to the complexity of this Project, we wish to divide it into three Phases. The first phase calls
for a feasibility study and estimated cost ranges with sketches of the proposed completed Project.
The second and third phases relate to Design and Construction, respectively. We are requesting an
exact cost for Phase I, but only an estimated cost range for Phases II and III, as it would not be
possible to cost out Phase III prior to Phase II completed and fully approved. And Phase II should
not move forward until there is some assurance that the Project is feasible. Fortunately there are
precedents for similar projects within Riverside County, which leads us to be optimistic.
Page 30 of 59
Article I. Introduction
Baristo Neighborhood Organization requests that your company make a proposal for your services
on Baristo Park. The following proposal request will outline the project goals and detail the format
and process for submitting your proposal. Please read the timeline carefully. In order for your
proposal to be considered, your proposal must meet our deadlines included in the timeline under
Section 2.02.
Section 1.01 Location and Sponsor
Your bid is for improvements at a Palm Springs CA public park located at 320 S. Calle Encilia, Palm
Springs CA G2262.
The Sponsor of this project is the Baristo Neighborhood Organization, incorporated as a 501(C)(4)
organization and duly certified by the Palm Springs Office of Neighborhoods, established by City
Ordinance in April 2005.
The owner of the Park is the City of Palm Springs, California.
Section 1.02 Management
As the Sponsor of this Project, the Baristo Neighborhood Organization has conceived the Project,
based upon extensive research, and will complete the process for funding the project by the City
of Palm Springs via its Measure J Community Initiated Grants Program.
The Neighborhood Organization will also serve as a liaison to the City of Palm Springs and to the
Riverside County Department of Flood Control as needed.
While Palm Springs is the owner of Baristo Park, Riverside County controls the Baristo Flood
Channel, a portion of which runs through the Park, and is the focal point of several Improvements.
Design and construction will be subject to the regulations of and approval by Palm Springs and
Riverside County (Flood Control).
We have asked the Public Arts Commission to assist with the design and placement of a small
monument which explains the origin of the Park’s name. This work will be done by others, although
the placement decision should be made during the design phase.
Section 1.03 Contact Information
The Board Chair of the Baristo Neighborhood Organization, Ned Barker, will be the contact for this
RFP. Additional neighborhood and board information is available via the Organization’s website,
https://baristops.com.
Please contact Board Chair Ned Barker for questions about the proposal submission details:
Ned Barker, Board Chair
Baristo Neighborhood Organization
436 Tan Oak Drive
Page 31 of 59
Palm Springs, California 92262
PH: (760) 898-9192
admin@baristops.com
Section 1.04 Background: the Baristo Community
Baristo Neighborhood is one of the most dense and diverse Neighborhoods in the City of Palm
Springs. Baristo is considered gateway to downtown Palm Springs. It contains a mix of apartments,
condominiums, and detached family residences. The city has also slated several vacant lots as
prime areas for the development of mid- or low-income residences. The proximity to downtown
and the number of service industry jobs makes the neighborhood attractive to residents. The
current and future density of the Neighborhood leads toward the need for additional greenspace
for families.
Pursuant to NeighborhoodScout’s website, the residents in the Baristo neighborhood have lower-
middle income, making it a below average income neighborhood. The neighborhood has an income
lower than 68.2% of U.S. neighborhoods. With 62.2% of the children here below the federal
poverty line, this neighborhood has a higher rate of childhood poverty than 97.3% of U.S.
neighborhoods.
In the Baristo neighborhood, 39.2% of the working population is employed in executive,
management, and professional occupations. The second most important occupational group in this
neighborhood is sales and service jobs, from major sales accounts, to working in fast food
restaurants, with 36.1% of the residents employed. Other residents here are employed in clerical,
assistant, and tech support occupations (12.8%), and 11.8% in manufacturing and laborer
occupations.
Baristo is also known as a hub for LGBTQ+ businesses and events in Palm Springs, with events like
Pride, Halloween, the White Party Weekend and the Dinah Shore Weekend attracting tens of
thousands of people annually.
Page 32 of 59
PARK USAGE
The park currently has limited usage in its current condition with amenities. The city has made
improvements such as shade structures and some revamped landscaping. However, the park lacks
an overall welcoming appearance and there are no public restroom facilities, water access, or
electricity.
The community needs a usable space for pet walking, a safe pathway for neighbors to walk to the
Palm Springs downtown corridor, an area for community gathering or city events, adequate
seating, cooling area/splash pad for the summer heat.
SAFETY
A major challenge to safety at Baristo Park is its flood or storm channel (wash) running through it.
This is unique, no other Palm Springs park has this. The channel slices the Park in half, which makes
it smaller, confining, and dangerous. All of these issues are called out in the Palm Springs Parks C
Recreation Master Plan written in 2014 (yet still our current Parks Master Plan), but have never
been addressed.
The wash was built in 1948. The Park opened in 1981, and The Desert Sun headline read: "Former
hideout becomes park." A truly safe park must be "open", but with the wash, this is complicated
and expensive, requiring City funding through its Measure J. Community Grants Program.
Our “model” or inspiration for dealing with a flood channel running through a neighborhood can
be found just 100 miles from Baristo Park. Our inspiration is in Los Angeles, where the Great Wall
of Los Angeles built foot bridges over a portion of a large flood channel, with walkways on each
side and murals along the channel.
We’ve already met with and walked the wash with Riverside County Flood Control engineers. We
believe it’s feasible and we learned from the engineers that, on a larger scale, similar work has
been accomplished with CV Link and the Perris Valley Trail, both of which border flood channels.
Back to “Safety”, Baristo Park has had crime-related issues since its inception. In fact crime was an
issue with this plot of land when it was just that – a plot of land with a fenced in wash running
through it.
Criminal activity has followed the wash-divided land because the was provides hiding places and
entrapment areas for illicit activities.
More recently, the Park has had a history of being an area for unhoused residents that have
deterred the use of the park by the public. This occupancy brought along drug use and
paraphernalia refuse including needles, plus indecent exposure with public defecation. The park
became so overrun, the community complained to the City and the park was completely fenced
and closed. The city cleaned the refuse, added new lighting and cameras, then reopened the park.
Safety has improved since that time, but the community has not embraced the park, as it is still
enclosed on three of its four sides and therefore, has severely limited emergency egress as well as
limited usage. Research indicates that increased usage levels will improve safety concerns.
Residents need to feel safe. If they don’t have anywhere to go without feeling in danger, they will
remain in their homes. In communities where no one leaves their homes, residents do not get the
benefits of outdoor activity or engaging with each other. Parks can help solve this problem by
providing residents and their kids with a safe place to go.
Page 33 of 59
Studies with different groups and communities in New York City show that parents feel safe at
parks with their kids when amenities are available. Parks with open spaces, regular upkeep,
maintenance and services can help create safe gathering spaces for all ages.
Parks give community members a safe location to gather and play. By having a safe place for their
kids, parents may be more likely to let their children outside. As already noted, when kids engage
in physical activity outside, they enjoy more significant benefits.
PARK SERVICES
The Project should increase Park services so as to increase usage. Some services may include water
fountains, restrooms, bike racks, electricity available for community/city events.
RECREATION
The park currently has a basketball court and playground equipment. The city has approved new
playground equipment for the 2025 calendar year. Current recreation facilities would remain, and
this project should incorporate the existing recreation facilities.
BEAUTIFICATION
The overall appearance of the park should be improved. The Baristo name holds historical
significance for the Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians and the City of Palm Springs. Historical
marker/monuments would be desired at the park’s main entrance on S Calle Encilia at E Saturnino.
Further park signage, water features, landscaping, upgraded walking paths, event pads, and art
would assist in the beautification and usage of the park.
Article II. The Project
Section 2.01 Mission
By the end of this Project we expect to achieve the following:
Residents are able to safely use the full space of the park with expanded ingress and egress,
improved beautification, increased seating, cooling water features, drinking water, and available
electricity for local and city events. The bifurcation of the Park is eliminated to the fullest extent
possible within Riverside County Flood Control regulations.
Section 2.02 Project Specifications: the Improvements
IMPROVEMENTS RELATED TO BARISTO FLOOD CONTROL CHANNEL
1. Fulfill the intent of the Parks and Recreation Department Master Plan (2014), to connect
both sides of the Park by foot bridges that span the channel beginning at the surface
concrete on one side, and ending at the same point on the opposite side.
2. A minimum of two bridges connecting the two sides of the Park is required. One should
be accessible via the southwest corner of S. Calle El Encilia and Saturnino, the second
Page 34 of 59
approximately midway between S. Calle El Segundo and S. Calle El Encilia, on the Saturnino
side, with the bridge terminating at the playground.
a. Foot bridges, as with other changes / additions to the channel, must be attractive, but
must also be designed (or procured) to minimize ongoing maintenance.
b. The foot bridges must have one or more removable bollards on each side, so as to
ensure that a motorized vehicle cannot drive across the bridge. The bollards must be
removeable so as to allow for County maintenance equipment to access the path.
c. The middle point of the foot bridges may be raised slightly, as per RCFC (Riverside
County Flood Control) regulations, for decorative purposes. However, ADA regulations
must also be followed.
d. The foot bridges may be level with or raised above the maintenance service area.
However, they may not encroach upon the maintenance service paths of the channel.
3. The existing (broken) cyclone fence border runs approximately 300 feet on each side of
the channel, 600 feet total. This is the Park’s chief eyesore, and its chief danger. It should
be removed and discarded.
4. New decorative fencing is to be purchased and installed as needed in areas outside of the
RCFC area of control. By “as needed” we mean:
a. The fencing must meet RCFC requirements that anticipate a pending flood emergency.
b. The fencing must meet all additional requirements of RCFC.
c. The fencing solution detailed in the Proposal must address the lack of open space
which is the hallmark of the current state of the Park.
d. The fencing must be decorative in nature, with its attractiveness supported
by appropriate landscaping.
5. New fencing should not prohibit use of the maintenance service paths by pedestrians. See,
for example, Tahquitz River, CV Link and Perris Valley Trail, all along RCFC channels. This
will contribute significantly toward opening up the Park.
Additional Park Improvements
ESSENTIAL PARK FEATURES
A. Replace the water fountain with a current model currently used by the City. Ensure dog water
fountain is attached.
B. Baristo Park monument sign near (new) Encilia entry (per City’s address for the Park)
C. Remove the cooking grills, they are mostly broken, and fires are an environmental and safety
problem.
D. Repair and update the water feature?
E. Add benches throughout the Park, with at least three focused on the playground area. No
bench should be placed in front of or close to a potential entrapment area.
Page 35 of 59
F. Purchase and install spectator benches along the west side of the basketball court. These
should be the same type of benches adjacent to the tennis courts on Via Miraleste at Ruth
Hardy Park. The benches must be shaded.
LANDSCAPING
G. Improve / modernize the overall “look and feel”
H. Replace the fading artificial turf running along Encilia with non-turf landscaping
I. Replace the dirt at the current Encilia entry way with turf.
J. Add attractive but low-maintenance landscaping along new fencing where appropriate
K. Extend the two walkways of the park to their appropriate ending at the new entries to the Park.
L. Trim or replace landscaping where bushes or trees create potential entrapment areas. Bushes
that may allow hiding should be four feet or less, with an expectation that they will be
continually trimmed to that height.
M. Replace the landscaping around the monument sign (east side of Park), as the current bushes
literally hide the sign. Use the same landscaping approach for the new Encilia entry monument
sign.
LIGHTING
N. Add lighting to cover the new extended walkways
O. Resurface the basketball court to eliminate puddles and cracks and allow for murals and
other markings appropriate to basketball P. Provide lighting where needed for all bench
areas.
CROSSWALKS
Q. Add new crosswalks with appropriate signage as needed – by others (the City)
a. East entrance, corner of Saturnino (the La Ventana corner where school
children wait for their bus) and S. Calle El Segundo straight across to the Park
b. West entrance crossing Encilia from the corner (where the back end of the
new Dunes hotel is) to the corner of Encilia and Saturnino. THIS SHOULD BE
THE PARK’S MAIN ENTRY, as the City’s address for the Park is at this location.
ART
R. Channel murals and / or additional artwork – by others
S. Small monument to tribal members whose names are integral to the Baristo Neighborhood –
by others
Page 36 of 59
T. Add mural(s) to basketball court – by others
Section 2.03 Contractor Requirements / Project Deliverables
Should your proposal be accepted, we expect you to contribute the following to the Project:
Contractor shall design, build, and manage the project, coordinate with the Riverside Flood
Control Authority and City of Palm Springs governmental entities, and provide periodic plan
construction and completion report to the Baristo Neighborhood Organization.
PROJECT DELIVERABLES
The Project is divided into three phases.
PHASE I: Feasibility and Cost
The intent of Phase I is to produce a document and presentation (the Phase I Report) with sufficient
information to allow stakeholders to decide if the Project can proceed to Phases II and III.
The Phase I Report will answer these questions, at minimum:
1. Is the Project feasible?
a. Is it reasonably possible to “open” the Baristo Flood Channel in a way that
allows for pedestrians to cross the channel from one side of the Park to
the other, without diminishing the channel’s effectiveness regarding flood
control?
b. Is it reasonably possible to “open” the Baristo Flood Channel in a way that
allows for pedestrians to walk alongside the channel pathways from its
West end to its East end without diminishing the channel’s effectiveness
regarding flood control?
c. To what extent is it reasonably possible to “open” the Park by reducing the
amount of fencing, or by relocating fencing, without diminishing the
channel’s effectiveness regarding flood control?
d. Are sufficient utilities available for the Improvements that require
electricity and / or water?
2. How much will the Project cost?
a. Provide an estimated range of costs for each of the primary Deliverables
for Phase II i. Develop Plans ii. Submit Plans for Review
b. Provide an estimated range of costs for each of the Deliverables for Phase
III i. Construction ii. Purchasing iii. Project Management
3. What might the completed Project look like?
Page 37 of 59
a. Provide conceptual sketches of the Park overall and of the Channel
specifically
PHASE II: Design
1. Develop Plans
a. Develop Plans for IMPROVEMENTS RELATED TO BARISTO FLOOD CONTROL CHANNEL
(Section 2.02 above, #1 through #5)
b. Develop Plans for ADDITIONAL IMPROVEMENTS (Section 2.02 above, “A” through
“P”)
2. Submit Plans for Approval
a. Submit Encroachment Permit Applications to Riverside County as needed for changes
related to the Baristo Flood Control Channel
b. Submit plans as required to the City of Palm Springs
NOTE: Encroachment Permits will require License Agreements for maintenance of specific
added items (e.g., foot bridges) between the City and the County.
PHASE III: Construction, Purchasing and Project Management
1. Construction
2. Purchasing
3. Project Management
Section 2.04 Timeline
In order to complete our mission, we have set the following timetable. This timetable is subject to
change by the managers of this project.
Milestone: Date:
Requests for Proposals Sent Out August 19, 2024
Letter of Intent or No-Bid Letters Sent August 26, 2024
Deadline for Proposals September 23, 2024
Project Start Date TBD
Measure J Funding Proposal September 30, 2024
Measure J Funding Grant December 30, 2024
Project Completion Date TBD
Page 38 of 59
Article III. The Proposal
Section 3.01 Summary of Proposal
(a) Expectations
Contracts will be awarded based on the information presented in the proposals received.
We will award contracts based on the proposal expected to be the most beneficial to our
project based on a variety of factors. Baristo Neighborhood Organization reserves the right
to award more than one contract, accept the lowest price offer, award contracts before the
proposal deadline listed in the timeline, award contracts before all proposals are received,
and refuse any contract without obligation to Baristo Neighborhood Organization or to the
company offering the proposal.
(b) Response Deadline
Please forward a letter of intent to the Baristo Board of Directors at Admin@baristops.com,
by August 26, 2024, if you intend to submit a proposal. Likewise, if you do not intend to
make a proposal, please forward a no-bid letter by the same date.
(c) Proposal Deadline
All proposals must be submitted to to the Baristo Board of Directors at Admin@baristops.com by
September 23, 2024 to be considered for their contribution to Baristo Park.
(d) Selection Criteria
All offers submitted will be considered based upon the materials provided in the proposal.
Consideration will be given to performance projections as well as cost and staff
requirements. Only those proposals submitted by the deadline above will be considere d.
The following criteria will be the primary considerations for selecting a proposal:
1. Submission of all proposals in the correct format by the stated deadline.
2. The perceived effectiveness of the proposal's solution for Baristo Neighborhood
Organization's stated mission.
3. The perceived ability for the proposing company's ability to deliver their services as set forth
in their proposal.
4. The proposing company's past performance in delivering such services.
5. Availability of sufficient high-quality personnel with the required skills for the specific
approach proposed.
6. Overall cost of the proposal.
The Baristo Neighborhood Organization may suspend or discontinue proposals at any time without
notice or obligation to the company that submitted the proposal.
Proposal Format
The Baristo Neighborhood Organization suggests that you include the following information in your
proposal. Proposals should adequately address the details of the proposed contract.
Page 39 of 59
1. Contractor Summary
2. Capabilities and Methodology
3. Expected Results,
4. Executives, Staffing, and Management
5. Communication
6. Equipment
7. Expense Breakdown
8. Expense Summary
9. Licensing and Bonding
10. Insurance
11. References
Section 3.02 Proposal Details
For some of the requested items below, a breakdown by Phase is suggested, with the bulk of detail
expected for Phase I.
(a) Contractor Summary
Include a brief history of your company including your past experience in dealing with
similar projects. Also include the owners' names or those persons authorized to sign
contracts for your business.
(b) Capabilities and Methodology
Detail your company's capabilities in delivering the requests in this proposal. You should
use this section to outline specifically your proposed method for achieving your goal. –
Riverside County Flood Control engineers have listed these capabilities as essential:
1. In-house or working relationship with a company that provides engineering services
relevant to the requirements of this RFP.
2. In-house or working relationship with a company that provides landscaping architect
services relevant to the requirements of this RFP.
3. In-house or working relationship with a company that has experience working with the
Riverside County Flood Control Department on issues relevant to the requirements of
this RFP.
Page 40 of 59
(c) Expected Results
Use this section to summarize the expected results of your methodology listed above. Please
focus on Phase I.
(d) Executives, Staffing, and Management
List the high-level executives or officers in charge of completing the project and a summary
of their background. You should also use this section to list the projected staffing and
management necessities and their estimated cost. Specify how you will obtain the staff to
complete the project.
(e) Communication
Explain how you intend to communicate between executives, management, and staff in
addition to how you will communicate to the project manager to ensure the project stays
on schedule.
(f) Equipment
Detail the equipment necessities as well as their estimated cost. If you need additional
services or space from Baristo Neighborhood Organization you should list those
requirements here with a brief explanation.
(g) Expense Breakdown
Build a detailed list of all expected expenses.
(h) Expense Summary
Give a brief summary of the total costs for your proposed contract. You may also include a brief
explanation of the contributing costs to the total cost.
(i) Licensing and Bonding
If applicable, include the details of your licenses and bonds for the services you are proposing. If
possible, enclose proof of your licenses and bonds.
(j) Insurance
If applicable, provide the details of insurance your company will provide for your staff and the
project.
(k) References
Provide 3 references for similar past projects, with an emphasis on working on / developing
parks, and / or working in the Palm Springs area, or the greater Coachella Valley.
Page 41 of 59
IMAGES
4.3 Inspirational Examples
All the desired elements of the Baristo Flood Channel, Baristo Park Section: footbridge
crossing the channel, attractive walkways along the channel, artwork (murals) along
channel. Note: artwork will be “by others”.
Figure 4.3-A Pearson Park, Anaheim, Kobe Bryant Memorial Basketball Court
Figure 4.3 The Great Wall of Los Angeles
Page 42 of 59
Baristo Park
Page 43 of 59
Additional Images
Page 44 of 59
Page 45 of 59
4.4 List of Companies that Provided Letters of Intent
Company Name Website HQ Location
Local
Location
Sotelo https://www.asotelo.com/index.html San Diego
1 Team member
lives in PS
RHA Landscape
Architects-Planners https://www.rhala.com/ Riverside N/A
Community Works https://www.cwdg.online/ Riverside N/A
Alta https://altago.com/ National / Canada San Diego
*Proposals are due on September 23, 2024.
4.5 Selected Proposal
The Baristo Neighborhood Organization Board of Directors voted unanimously to select the proposal
of Sotelo Landscape Architects on September 28, 2024. This was one of two Proposals submitted
for our consideration by companies that requested the RFP.
The selection process relied upon the criteria set in the RFP. From the RFP, here are the criteria for
bid selection:
“All offers submitted will be considered based upon the materials provided in the proposal.
Consideration will be given to performance projections as well as cost and staff
requirements. Only those proposals submitted by the deadline above will be consider ed.
The following criteria will be the primary considerations for selecting a proposal:
1. Submission of all proposals in the correct format by the stated deadline.
2. The perceived effectiveness of the proposal's solution for Baristo Neighborhood
Organization's stated mission.
3. The perceived ability for the proposing company's ability to deliver their services as set forth
in their proposal.
4. The proposing company's past performance in delivering such services.
5. Availability of sufficient high-quality personnel with the required skills for the specific
approach proposed.
6. Overall cost of the proposal.
“The Baristo Neighborhood Organization may suspend or discontinue proposals at any time
without notice or obligation to the company that submitted the proposal.”
For information about Sotelo Landscape Architects, please see the two documents submitted with
this Application:
• Baristo Park Phase 1
Page 46 of 59
• Baristo Park Phases 2 & 3
It should be noted that Sotelo Landscape Architects’ most recent project in the Valley is just 3 ½
blocks from Baristo Park: the Agua Caliente Cultural Museum. In fact, Sotelo was recommended
to the Baristo NOrg by the Tribe’s Planning Department.
Additional information is available at Sotelo’s website, https://www.asotelo.com/index.html.
4.6 Estimated Costs
We are requesting 537,210 for Phases 1 and 2 of this Project.
AMOUNT OUTCOME RECIPIENT
148,800 Phase I (Feasibility including Conceptual Design)
Details
Sotelo
15,500 Restroom Feasibility Sotelo
283,850 Phase II (Design) Details Sotelo
37,500 Restroom Design (if feasible) Sotelo
485,650 SUBTOTAL, Phases 1 & 2
48,560 Contingency, 10% Sotelo
3,000 3 Years of 3rd-party audits of the Baristo NOrg, to
ensure that funds from Measure J and other grant
sources are handled and managed correctly.
Baristo Neighborhood
Organization
537,210 TOTAL, Phases 1 & 2
Page 47 of 59
4.7 Phase I Feasibility Cost Details
The Conceptual Design Phase will include “Town Hall” style community outreach, to
determine which features are most critical to the entire community.
Page 48 of 59
4.8 Phase II – Design and Approvals Cost Details
Page 49 of 59
4.9 Phase III – Construction Cost Details [Approximation]
Phase III costs will not be absolutely known until Phases I and 2 are completed. However, Sotelo has
estimated these costs in the breakdown below.
Note that the features that are driving much of the cost in Phase III have not been value engineered
yet.
The Baristo NOrg intends to research and source statewide and federal grant opportunities for
funding all or a portion of Phase III.
Page 50 of 59
4.10 Project Duration / Timeline
Sotelo has developed a timeline for for Phase I. They are projecting a 16-week process.
Page 51 of 59
We are hopeful that Phases 1 and 2 could be completed by the end of 2025, including completion of
a thorough community outreach initiative which will take place during Phase I. Phase III, if funding
is successfully identified and committed, could be completed by the end of 2026.
4.11 Project Management and Oversight
Project Management will be the contractual obligation of Sotelo. Ned Barker, The Neighborhood
Organization and Board Chair, with the assistance of other Members from the NOrg, will monitor the
Project progress and activity, and will report accordingly to the City, the Measure J Commission, and
other stakeholders as appropriate and / or as requested.
It is the Neighborhood’s specific request to liaise with the Parks and Recreation Commission and
Staff Members, as deemed appropriate by the Director of the Parks and Recreation Department.
Financial management will be an important aspect of this Project. As such, the Baristo
Neighborhood Organization Treasurer David Reily, a retired banking executive, will engage the
services of a CPA firm to audit the NORG each year the NOrg receives funds for this project. The
audits will be posted on the www.BaristoPS.com website, and be shared with stakeholders upon
request. Further, the Neighborhood Organization will join GuideStar and post its financials there.
5 The Improvements and Benefits for the Park, the
Community and the City
The following details, Sections 3.1.1 and 3.1.2 are replicated from Section 2.02 of the RFP.
5.1.1 IMPROVEMENTS RELATED TO BARISTO FLOOD CONTROL CHANNEL
1. Fulfill the intent of the Parks and Recreation Department Master Plan (2014), and begin
the linear park (“NSPS) envisioned in the Section 14 Specific Plan7, to connect both sides
of the Park by foot bridges that span the channel beginning at the surface concrete on one
side, and ending at the same point on the opposite side.
2. A minimum of two bridges connecting the two sides of the Park is required. One should
be accessible via the southwest corner of S. Calle El Encilia and Saturnino, the second
approximately midway between S. Calle El Segundo and S. Calle El Encilia, on the Saturnino
side, with the bridge terminating at the playground.
a. Foot bridges, as with other changes / additions to the channel, must be attractive, but
must also be designed (or procured) to minimize ongoing maintenance.
b. The foot bridges must have one or more removable bollards on each side, so as to
ensure that a motorized vehicle cannot drive across the bridge. The bollards must be
removeable so as to allow for County maintenance equipment to access the path.
7 “A pedestrian and bicycle system on all major arterials, along the flood control system and along key
secondary arterials created with extensive landscape and streetscape features. With its landscaping and its
linkages to existing parks and commercial attractions, the network constitutes a linear public park system and
provides a focus for leisure-time activities and community services.
Page 52 of 59
c. The middle point of the foot bridges may be raised slightly, as per RCFC (Riverside
County Flood Control) regulations, for decorative purposes. However, ADA regulations
must also be followed.
d. The foot bridges may be level with or raised above the maintenance service area.
However, they may not encroach upon the maintenance service paths of the channel.
3. The existing (broken) cyclone fence border runs approximately 300 feet on each side of
the channel, 600 feet total. This is the Park’s chief eyesore, and its chief danger. It should
be removed and discarded.
4. New decorative fencing is to be purchased and installed as needed in areas outside of the
RCFC area of control. By “as needed” we mean:
a. The fencing must meet RCFC requirements that anticipate a pending flood emergency.
b. The fencing must meet all additional requirements of RCFC.
c. The fencing solution detailed in the Proposal must address the lack of open space
which is the hallmark of the current state of the Park.
d. The fencing must be decorative in nature, with its attractiveness supported by
appropriate landscaping.
5. New fencing should not prohibit use of the maintenance service paths by pedestrians. See,
for example, Tahquitz River, CV Link and Perris Valley Trail, all along RCFC channels. This
will contribute significantly toward opening up the Park.
5.1.2 Additional Park Improvements
5.1.2.1 ESSENTIAL PARK FEATURES
• Replace the water fountain with a current model currently used by the City. Ensure dog water
fountain is attached.
• Baristo Park monument sign near (new) Encilia entry (per City’s address for the Park)
• Remove the cooking grills, they are mostly broken, and fires are an environmental and safety
problem.
• Repair and update the water feature?
• Add benches throughout the Park, with at least three focused on the playground area. No
bench should be placed in front of or close to a potential entrapment area.
• Purchase and install spectator benches along the west side of the basketball court. These
should be the same type of benches adjacent to the tennis courts on Via Miraleste at Ruth
Hardy Park. The benches must be shaded.
5.1.2.2 LANDSCAPING
• Improve / modernize the overall “look and feel”
• Replace the fading artificial turf running along Encilia with non-turf landscaping
• Replace the dirt at the current Encilia entry way with turf.
Page 53 of 59
• Add attractive but low-maintenance landscaping along new fencing where appropriate
• Extend the two walkways of the park to their appropriate ending at the new entries to the Park.
• Trim or replace landscaping where bushes or trees create potential entrapment areas. Bushes
that may allow hiding should be four feet or less, with an expectation that they will be
continually trimmed to that height.
• Replace the landscaping around the monument sign (east side of Park), as the current bushes
literally hide the sign. Use the same landscaping approach for the new Encilia entry monument
sign.
5.1.2.3 LIGHTING
• Add lighting to cover the new extended walkways
• Resurface the basketball court to eliminate puddles and cracks and allow for murals and
other markings appropriate to basketball P. Provide lighting where needed for all bench
areas.
5.1.2.4 CROSSWALKS
• Add new crosswalks with appropriate signage as needed – by others (the City)
c. East entrance, corner of Saturnino (the La Ventana corner where school
children wait for their bus) and S. Calle El Segundo straight across to the Park
d. West entrance crossing Encilia from the corner (where the back end of the
new Dunes hotel is) to the corner of Encilia and Saturnino. THIS SHOULD BE
THE PARK’S MAIN ENTRY, as the City’s address for the Park is at this location.
5.1.2.5 ART
U. Channel murals and / or additional artwork – by others
V. Small monument to tribal members whose names are integral to the Baristo Neighborhood –
by others
5.2 Art in Baristo Park
Artwork is an important factor for the Park’s stakeholders. We have presented to the Public Arts
Commission, and received very positive feedback.
However, the artwork itself is not part of the RFP. It is referenced for its importance, but called out
specifically as “by others”. In short, we wish to work with the Public Arts Commission rather than
our selected contractor for this project.
Page 54 of 59
5.3 Baristo Neighborhood Park and Street Names8
We have already presented one concept to the Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians’ Tribal
Council. This was accomplished by working through the Tribe’s Planning Department. The response
was positive.
Our Neighborhood is exactly one-half of Section 14. We have suggested a monument, and perhaps
later even murals or other styles of artwork, reflecting the tribal leaders whose names are forever
embedded with the Baristo Neighborhood.
The names of these early 20th century tribal leaders’ are the basis for our street names, and also for
our Park’s name:
• Baristo Sol Santiago (1884-1942), the origin of the Park’s name. The street known as
Baristo was known as Lime street prior to the renaming.
• Lee Arenas, for whom Arenas Road is named. The street was formerly known as Park
Street. Arenas was a long-distance runner, known both for his speed and stamina,
was also a businessperson and active in tribal politics.
• Ramon Manuel. Ramon Road, formerly South Street, was named for Ramon Manuel,
a colorful figure who enjoyed wearing a 10-gallon Stetson hat. He attended Palm
Springs High School and St. Boniface Indian School in Banning. He managed the
tribal bathhouse on Section 14.
• Miguel Saturnino. Saturnino was a Cahuilla Indian cowboy who made a living running
his own herd and as a farmer. He was politically active in tribal affairs. Saturmino
Road is actually a misspelling of Miguel Saturnino’s name.
• Clemente Segundo. the tribal leader who negotiated the first long -term lease,
resulting in the construction of the airport on Section 18. The federal lawsuit,
Clemente Segundo et al vs. United States demanded that the allotments be
redistributed equally between individual tribal members.
We also presented our basketball court as a potential canvas for an artist. Our inspiration images at
the end of the RFP include the incredible Kobe Bryant memorial basketball court in Pearson Park, an
Anaheim neighborhood park.
5.4 The Benefits of Baristo Park Improvements, to the Community and to
the City
5.4.1 The effective or usable size of the Park will double
As demonstrated in Section 1.31 the Park has lost more than half of its usability due to the Baristo
Channel. Once the Improvements are implemented, the non-usable size of the Park is diminished
8 Sources are VisitPalmSprings.com, the Desert Sun, and Palm Springs Life.
Page 55 of 59
significantly. Only the concrete portion of the Channel would be unusable. This is 547 feet long and
just 25 feet wide, less than one-third of one acre.
5.4.2 With increased use of the Park, the instances of illicit activities will be
significantly reduced
As demonstrated in Section 1.2, the Channel, directly and indirectly, provides hiding places for illicit
activities. These hiding places will be significantly diminished, restricted to a few feet on each side
of the Channel. However, perhaps more importantly, the maintenance paths alongside the Channel
will be transformed into pedestrian walkways, well-lit in the evenings. This, perhaps more than
anything else, will render the Park significantly safer to use.
More specifically, barriers to Natural Surveillance will be largely eliminated. Park users will FEEL
SAFE due to the welcoming Park entry, the openness of the Park, the welcoming wayfinding, the
additional pathways with lighting, the free access to Park egress by crossing either of the bridges, or
exiting the Park at either end. Emergency egress opportunities now will exist in any direction except
for the north side wall that abuts the Rancheria Del Sol apartments.
5.4.3 The Baristo Neighborhood will be more attractive to affordable housing
developers
As detailed in Section 2.1.1, ten of the City’s 17 locations identified as potential locations for new
affordable housing, are located within walking distance of Baristo Park.
This could increase the desirability of potential employees and their families to relocated close to
downtown: increase workforce availably
The effect of a newer better Park on affordable housing is reinforced in the ROI section below.
5.4.4 Return on Investment (ROI)
We often think of Parks as amenities – and of course, they are. However, they are also much more
than that.
The “amenity” description is certainly understandable. A 2010 University of Vermont PhD
candidate’s dissertation on valuing parks phrased it this way: 9
“Many of the benefits that are generated by the natural environment are external to
normal market transactions and are consequently undervalued and under -
provisioned even though they substantially contribute to human welfare.”
The Trust for Public Land expounds on evaluating the value of parks:10
“Parks and green spaces improve water quality, naturally manage stormwater,
reduce air pollution, enhance community health, provide recreational opportunities,
attract and retain businesses, and support economic development in their region.
People who are physically active in parks have reduced healthcare costs. In turn, all
9 A Multilevel Property Hedonic Approach to Valuing Parks and Open Space (uvm.edu)
10 Dollars and Sense: Economic Benefits of Community Green Spaces - Trust for Public Land (tpl.org)
Page 56 of 59
of this generates local tax revenue both from increased property values and from
tourist spending.”
In this Section we will suggest that there may be some ways to quantify a downtown park’s
value.
5.4.4.1 The Economic Benefit of Downtown Parks
The National Parks & Recreation Association’s magazine, Parks & Recreation Magazine, ran a feature
in 2017 entitled The Economic Benefit of Downtown Parks.11
We believe that this article speaks to the idea that Baristo Park is central to the location of future
affordable housing developments, as explained in Section 1.1.1.
“Amenity infrastructure is so critical that it helps potentially undesirable areas
transform into hubs of activity and redevelopment. In many cases, the creation of any
type of park space on a vacant or under-utilized parcel can lead to new residential,
mixed-use or retail area around these parks, all of which increase the quality of life
for residents and visitors to that community.”
5.4.4.2 The Value of Walkability
A 2012 Bloomberg City Lab study reported that “…the Brookings Institution created a five-tiered
scale of walkability for metropolitan neighborhoods…”.
In fact, this study reported an impressive correlation between “walkability” and the values of our
homes and businesses:12
“…truly walkable urban communities are much more economically vibrant than their
drivable suburban neighbors. For each step up this walkability ladder (which was
constructed using the Irvine Minnesota Inventory of urban design dimensions linked
to walkability), a store is likely to boost its retail sales by 80 percent, in part thanks to
all this sidewalk traffic.* The value of your home is likely to go up by $81.54 per square
foot. Average rent per square foot of office space, meanwhile, goes up $8.88.”
We note that Bloomberg’s examples predict increases in home value and increases in
store sales. In turn, these would turn into added sales tax revenue (including Measure J
taxes) for the City as well as increases to the County’s property taxes.
5.4.4.3 Parks Offer a Return on Investment of 20X
Soofa’s Smart City Research’s SMART PARKS 2016 white paper cited additional ways that park
investments benefit the communities they serve. Their analysis supports a TWENTY-TO-ONE ratio of
Return on Investment for Parks.
That certainly seems like a lot. Until one understands the depth of their research. The MIT-based
company lists the categories for their return estimate, and a value (with sources) for each: 13
11 The Economic Benefit of Downtown Parks | Feature | Parks and Recreation Magazine | NRPA
12 Why We Pay More for Walkable Neighborhoods - Bloomberg
13 Soofa_Whitepaper_SmartParks.pdf (squarespace.com)
Page 57 of 59
• Property Value Increases
• Direct Use Value
• Physical Health Value
• Mental Health Value
• Stormwater Management Savings
• Community Cohesion Value
• Tourism
• Air Pollution Mitigation Savings
5.4.5 Creation of a “template” for other portions of the Baristo Channel and
other such channels throughout the Valley.
The Baristo Channel’s above ground route begins at Indian Canyon and travels above ground nearly
all the way to Sunrise Way, close to Sunrise Park. Could we link the two parks in this way?
Baristo Channel eventually links, underground, with the Tahquitz Creek Channel, in the Prescott
Preserve.
5.4.6 Creating a connection with Section 14 per examples of street names
cited earlier
5.4.7 Increase the desirability of potential employees and their families to
relocated close to downtown: increase workforce availably
5.4.8 Creates additional art opportunities
5.4.9 Set a new bar for park design
6 Potential Funding Resources to Complete Phase III
The Board will initiate a process for exploring grant opportunities in 2025, in hopes that construction
could begin as early as 2026.
6.1 Potential Statewide and Regional Grant Resources
6.1.1 https://parkscalifornia.org
6.1.2 https://ArtsinCaliforniaParks.org
Arts in California Parks is a new program that supports artists, culture bearers, California
Native American tribes, and communities in creating artwork, art installations and
programming in state parks and local communities as catalysts for sustainable community
connection, health, and well-being.
Page 58 of 59
Since Baristo Park is situated on tribal land, and since it is the only park in Section 14, we believe that
we could qualify for funding for mural and other arts on the Baristo Park wall, and on the sides of the
Channel itself.
Arts in California Parks states that: “The Local Parks Grants Program will award funds for projects
and programs in local parks throughout California through three grant cycles, anticipated for 2024,
2025 and 2026.”
6.1.3 The Office of Grants and Local Services California State Parks
“The Office of Grants and Local Services (OGALS) develops and administers grant programs that
provide funding for local, state, and nonprofit organization projects. Grant projects generally
address park, recreation and resources related needs.
“Since 1964, more than 7,700 parks throughout California have been created or improved through
OGALS' administered grant funding.
“Since 2000, OGALS has administered approximately $3.8 billion in grant funding throughout
California.
“OGALS' mission is to address California's diverse recreational, cultural and historical resource
needs by developing grant programs, administering funds, offering technical assistance, building
partnerships and providing leadership through quality customer service.”
6.1.4 State of California Department of Parks and Recreation (California State
Parks)
“California State Parks’ grants cover a diverse range of projects, such as the renovation and
expansion of local parks’ basketball courts and soccer fields, construction of boat launching
facilities on California’s waterways, programs for off-highway motor vehicle safety and
environmental education, youth theater programs and the repair of playground equipment. And this
is just a small sampling of what our grants can accomplish.
“The funding allows for investment and innovation throughout the state. Totaling about $3 billion so
far over the past 60 years, State Parks’ grants provide opportunities that bring together local, state,
federal and nonprofit grant partnerships in a variet y of areas—urban and rural parks, off-highway
vehicle areas and thousands of miles of California waterways.”
6.1.5 Route to Parks Grants Program
These grants are designed to improve access to nature, and the Baristo Park challenge is about
exactly that: access to the Park itself.
The Baristo Flood Channel is approximately one full mile in length. The portion of the Channel that is
modified for pedestrian access could serve as a template for making the entire Baristo Channel into
a unique pedestrian walkway, and eventually a linear park.
“This program is made possible through a public-private partnership, supported by private
fundraising by Parks California, and the California Department of Parks and Recreation’s Waterway
Connections Initiative. Route to Parks is aligned with the goals of C alifornia Natural Resources
Page 59 of 59
Agency’s Outdoors for All program. Through this partnership, Parks California is excited to expand
the Route to Parks grants program this year with increased opportunities for water-related outdoor
access and experiences.”
6.2 Potential Federal or National Grant Resources
6.2.1 Outdoor Recreation Legacy Partnership Program
“The Outdoor Recreation Legacy Partnership (ORLP) program, established in 2014, is a nationally
competitive grant program funded through the Land and Water Conservation Fund. The ORLP
focuses on providing outdoor recreation in disadvantaged communities within urban areas. The
National Park Service has funds available for land acquisition, new park development, or the
renovation of existing parks, all with the goal of reconnecting people with the outdoors.
“The Department of Interior opened the seventh application round with more than $224 million in
grant funding for local communities across the United States. This is the largest grant funding round
since the launch of the program.”
Among other publications, this group has created a booklet entitled: Funding Strategies for
Neighborhood Parks. Closing the Gap: Public and Private Funding Strategies for Neighborhood Parks
- City Parks Alliance
6.2.2 The National Recreation and Park Association
This resource publishes a significant list of Grants and Fundraising Resources. Grant Opportunities,
Fundraising Resources, Funding | National Recreation and Park Association (nrpa.org)
Another list of potential funders is found at the NRPA address: Federal Money: Funding for Park and
Recreation Projects of all Sizes | Advocacy | Parks and Recreation Magazine | NRPA
7 Conclusion
Baristo Park is the only park in the City’s densest Neighborhood, the Baristo Neighborhood.
The Baristo Neighborhood may also be the most-populated of Palm Springs’ 52 Neighborhoods.
Baristo Park is the only park within Section 14.
Baristo Park is the only park on downtown’s south side.
Baristo Park is the only park with a Channel running through it.
With the new Measure J funding for Community-Initiated Projects, now is the time make the
Park and the Park experience worthy of its City’s reputation.
SEPTEMBER 27, 2024Baristo Park
Proposal: Phase 2 & 3
BARISTO PARK PROPOSAL | CONTENTS 2
Contents
COVER LETTER
PROJECT APPROACH
1. CONTRACTOR SUMMARY
2. CAPABILITIES AND METHODOLOGY
3. EXPECTED RESULTS
4. EXECUTIVES, STAFFING AND MANAGEMENT
5. COMMUNICATION
6. EQUIPMENT
7. EXPENSE BREAKDOWN
8. EXPENSE SUMMARY
9. LICENSING AND BONDING
10. INSURANCE
11. PROJECT REFERENCES
BARISTO PARK PROPOSAL | COVER LETTER 3
Thank you for the opportunity to participate in
the Baristo Park Improvements project. We are genuinely
excited to be involved in such a meaningful initiative.
Our team, led by Sotelo Landscape Architects,
with Three Peak Corp. as the contractor and Michael Baker
International as our Civil, Structural, and Geotechnical
engineers, has studied and visited the site to evaluate its
potential and challenges. We’ve crafted a plan focused on
maximizing usable space, enhancing the park’s identity,
and creating a safe, vibrant gathering place for the
community.
In our meeting with the Riverside County Flood
Control and Water Conservation District (RCFC&WCD),
we explored potential solutions to increase open space
and connectivity within the park while ensuring a safe
environment for children at play. We aim to fulfill the
promise made in 1981 to turn this hideout into a real park,
combining openness and connectivity with art to create
a unique destination that enriches the neighborhood’s
quality of life.
Three Peaks holds General Engineering A and
General Building B licenses from the California Contractors
State License Board and is based in Calimesa. We have
successfully completed a diverse range of projects,
including sports parks, pocket parks, amphitheaters, and
playgrounds, in cities such as Yucaipa, El Centro, Redlands,
Riverside County, San Bernardino County, Brea, Fullerton,
and throughout the Coachella Valley.
Our firms bring together an impressive portfolio
of projects, providing us with the experience and
expertise to deliver this project with the utmost care
and professionalism. Our consultants have successfully
worked together on numerous occasions and are eager to
collaborate once more on this exciting project.
Cover Letter
BARISTO PARK PROPOSAL | PROJECT APPROACH 4
GENERAL APPROACH
Our project process will aim to revitalize Baristo Community Park, addressing the
urgent needs of the neighborhood while fostering a sense of community identity and
pride. Through collaborative efforts with stakeholders and understanding of Baristo’s
unique community identity, this project aims to create a revitalized Community Park that
serves as a safe, inclusive, and vibrant hub for residents. Together, we can transform
Baristo Community Park into a cherished asset for current and future generations.
DESIGN APPROACH
The bubble diagram below visually represents the key needs and requirements
for the revitalization of Baristo Park. This diagram illustrates our holistic approach to
transforming the park into a vibrant hub for families and individuals alike.
LEGEND
1. Decorative guard
rail along channel
2. Guard rail or
planted hedge
3. Overhead entry sign
4. Landscape inspired
by Palm Springs
5. Lawn near bridge to
open up views
6. Play structure and
shade to remain
7. Colored concrete
paths
8. Convert
maintenance path
to a multi use trail
9. Foot bridges
10. New amenities
11. New historic marker
monument
12. New light fixtures
13. New benches
14. Resurfaced
basketball court
15. New bleachers and
shade structure
16. Decorative fence
Figure 1. Bubble Diagram
ALTERNATES
A. Rubber Play Surfacing
B. Second overhead sign
structure
C. Add misters to shade
structures
Project
Approach
BARISTO PARK PROPOSAL | PROJECT APPROACH 5
• SEATING. Ample seating options will be
included throughout the park to encourage
social interaction and relaxation.
• COOLING AREA / SPLASH PAD. A splash pad will
provide a refreshing respite from the summer
heat, making the park a popular destination
for families.
• BRIDGES OVER THE STORM CHANNEL. The
design will ensure safety and connectivity
while maintaining the natural beauty of the
surrounding area.
• ELIMINATE HIDING SPACES. Careful landscaping
and design choices will be made to enhance
visibility and safety throughout the park.
• INCORPORATE EXISTING RECREATION FACILITIES.
The existing basketball court and playground
will be integrated into the new design,
enhancing usability.
• IMPROVE OVERALL APPEARANCE. We will focus
on aesthetics, ensuring that the park is not
only functional but also visually appealing,
fostering community pride.
Our approach to essential features that will
enhance the park’s functionality, accessibility and
overall appeal are listed next.
• WELCOMING APPEARANCE. Design elements
will include colorful landscaping and engaging
signage that reflect the vibrancy of Baristo.
• WATER AND ELECTRICITY ACCESS. Infrastructure
will support both recreational activities and
community events.
• USABLE SPACE FOR PET WALKING. Ample
pathways will be inclusive to all, including pets
and their owners. Signage will be provided to
promote responsible pet ownership.
• SAFE PATHWAY TO DOWNTOWN PALM SPRINGS.
Well-lit, secure pathways will connect the
park to downtown, enhancing walkability and
accessibility.
• COMMUNITY GATHERING AREA FOR EVENTS. A
flexible space for events will be designed to
accommodate cultural celebrations, markets
and community meetings.
PROJECT COORDINATION
We will address all stakeholders—The
Baristo Neighborhood Organization, the City of
Palm Springs, Riverside County Flood Control
and Water Conservation District, and the Public
Arts Commission—to create a vibrant and
welcoming space that meets the unique needs
of Baristo’s diverse population.
• BARISTO NEIGHBORHOOD ORGANIZATION.
We will collaborate closely with community
leaders to ensure that the park reflects the
values and aspirations of Baristo residents,
incorporating their feedback into the design
process.
• CITY OF PALM SPRINGS. Partnering with
the city will be crucial for navigating
regulations and securing funding. We will
leverage city resources to enhance the
park’s accessibility and usability for all
residents.
• RIVERSIDE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF FLOOD
CONTROL. To safely address the storm
channel, we will work with this department
to design a bridge that connects the two
halves of the park, ensuring that it is both
functional and aesthetically pleasing.
• PUBLIC ARTS COMMISSION. We will
incorporate public art elements that
celebrate Baristo’s rich cultural diversity,
creating visual connections that enhance
community identity and pride.
BARISTO PARK PROPOSAL | CONTRACTOR SUMMARY 6
THREE PEAKS CORP,
GENERAL CONTRACTOR
Three Peaks Corp. was established in 2009 and has since gained the trust and
respect of both public and private entities by successfully completing over
300 projects. We maintain crews of multi-trade talented employees. We have
completed a wide range of projects including but not limited to: sports parks, dog
parks, skateparks, pocket parks, restroom/ concession buildings, amphitheaters,
playgrounds, shade structures, parking lots, turf conversion projects, and field
lighting projects. Our company has worked with a number of public agencies
including City of El Centro, Heber PUD, City of Yucaipa, City of Redlands, County of
Riverside, County of San Bernardino, City of Brea, City of Fullerton, and most of the
Cities in the Coachella Valley. Our vast network of suppliers and subcontractors
throughout Southern California including the Imperial Valley are paramount to the
successful completion of every project we work on. Additionally, Three Peaks Corp.
certifies that the company is in good standing with all licensing boards and is
eligible to contract with any federal, state or local public agency.
SOTELO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS,
LEAD DESIGNER & LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
Sotelo Landscape Architects is an award-winning firm with over 20 years
of experience in designing innovative outdoor social spaces that blend art,
architecture, and environmental passion. Our projects range from private
residences to large-scale developments like casinos and resorts, both nationally
and internationally. Our team combines diverse expertise in a collaborative design
process, emphasizing clear communication and integrity. We focus on creating
inspiring, timeless spaces that fit perfectly with their surroundings, featuring clean
lines and a carefully curated plant palette. Committed to sustainability, we prioritize
drought-tolerant design and the long-term usability of each site, ensuring our
projects endure.
1.Contractor
Summary
REFERENCES: City of Yucaipa
34272 Yucaipa Blvd.
Yucaipa, CA 92399
Fermin Preciado
Director of Development Services
fpreciado@yucaipa.org
(909) 797-2489, Ext 240
City of Indio
100 Civic Center Mall,
Indio, CA 92201
Tim Wassil
Public Works Director
twassil@indio.org
(760) 625-1801
REFERENCES: Joseph Baruffaldi Jr., AIA
HBG Design
jbaruffaldi@hbg.design
(203) 915-6840
Stephanie Schillig, CID, NCODQ
Design Director
stephanie@igroupdesign.com
(619) 439-9538
BARISTO PARK PROPOSAL | CONTRACTOR SUMMARY 7
MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL,
CIVIL & STRUCTURAL AND GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING
Michael Baker International has been a leader in engineering and consulting
services for over 80 years, tackling complex infrastructure challenges with expertise
and innovation. With offices throughout southern California, including Palm Desert,
they have a history of working on public projects like roads, bridges, mass transit
and water treatment in Southern California with ample experience with Riverside
County Flood Control. They act as trusted advisers to communities, enhancing
safety, accessibility, and sustainability. Committed to transformational change, their
dedicated experts challenge the status quo and bring diverse experiences to the
table. Ultimately, they focus on delivering quality of life through visionary leadership
and innovative solutions.
RIZZA ENGINEERING INC,
ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING
Rizza Engineering is a nationally recognized, award-winning Electrical Engineering
and Lighting Design firm based in Poway, CA. With a global reach, they specialize in
the Hospitality, Education, and Wellness sectors, delivering tailored solutions that
enhance each project. Their experienced team excels in power systems design,
architectural lighting, telecommunications, and electronic security, ensuring
successful outcomes for complex projects. From master planning to construction
administration, they embrace challenges with a can-do attitude. Committed to
sustainability, their LEED Accredited professionals help clients achieve eco-friendly
goals while minimizing life cycle costs, making them a trusted partner for owners,
architects and contractors alike.
REFERENCES: City of Coachella
1515 Sixth Street
Coachella, California 92236
Jonathan D Hoy
City Engineer
(760) 398-5744
Riverside County
Flood Control District
1995 Market Street
Riverside, CA 92501
Ms. Julianna Gonzalez
(951) 955-8064
juliannagonzalez@rcflood.org
REFERENCES: Sam Passanisi
President of Neal Electric
sam.passanisi@nealelectric.com
(619) 742-8858
Kevin Cammall
Managing Corporate Officer of
Soltek Pacific Construction
kcammall@soltekpacific.com
(619) 417-2257
BARISTO PARK PROPOSAL | CAPABILITIES AND METHODOLOGY 8
PHASE 1: FEASIBILITY AND COST
In this phase our design team, composed of the executives and staff listed in section 4 of
this proposal, will start working on preliminary designs for the project. We’ve outlined the
steps of this phase in the following points:
1. Our team will coordinate and attend a project Kick-off meeting within one (1) week of
receiving the Notice-to-Proceed. The purpose of the meeting will be to introduce the
team, establish clear lines of communications, refine the proposed scope, schedule,
regulatory items, approval processes and establish general design guidelines. Ú
written summary will be provided to all the parts.
2. We will perform necessary data collection that will include research, gathering
and reviewing existing City, and County records appropriate for the project. This
information will include but not be limited to:
• Previous planning drawings and documents
• Previous site improvement plans
• Existing utility record drawings
• City and County record drawings
• Water and sewer maps
3. An initial survey of the site will be prepared to determine the limits of the easement,
utilities, boundaries and topography. The resulting drawing will serve as the base our
preliminary design drawings.
4. A preliminary foundation report will be prepared by our Geotechnical engineers
based on surface data to provide preliminary recommendations and assist structural
designers in the feasibility study (Phase I Report, as stated in the RFP).
5. Sotelo Landscape Architects will prepare preliminary drawings, sketches and ideas
showing the proposed improvements. Items related to the improvements for the flood
channel will be thoroughly reviewed by the design team, receiving feedback and
leaning on the experience of team members with working relationship with Riverside
County Flood Control.
6. Our design team will hold meetings with the Board, City and Riverside County Flood
Control & Water Conservation District to explore the feasibility of the project. In these
meetings we’ll receive input regarding the two main issues of the project: flood
channel improvements and other additional park improvements.
7. The comments from these initial meetings will shape the design by providing possible
solutions to the key project challenges. We’ll incorporate changes into the preliminary
plans and meet with the involved agencies again for a design review.
8. If no further comments occur, the preliminary design will be further developed into a
preliminary masterplan. It will then be distributed to the civil, structural and electrical
2. Capabilities and
Methodology
BARISTO PARK PROPOSAL | CAPABILITIES AND METHODOLOGY 9
engineers with enough information to develop preliminary submittal documents.
9. The contractor in coordination with the entire team will prepare preliminary cost
estimates based on the approved design and coordinate the submittals to the City of
Palm Springs and the RCFC&WCD and provide us with their feedback.
PHASE 2: DESIGN
Once the conceptual plans are approved by the agencies our team will start assembling
the full Construction Documents for submittal. These plans will address two issues
separately:
• Improvements Related to Baristo Flood Control Channel.
These will include foot bridges, new design for a removable decorative fence along
the channel that complies with the requirements of RCFC.
• Additional improvements.
These will include new pathways, new landscaping, new lighting, resurfacing
basketball, entry signs, site furniture, possible shade structures, water feature or
splash pad, new bleachers with shade structure, and possibly resurfacing play areas
and adding misters to new shade structures.
PHASE 3: CONSTRUCTION, PURCHASING AND PROJECT MANAGEMENT
Once the CD’s (construction documents) are finalized and the required permits and
approvals from RCFC and the City of Palm Springs are obtained our Project Manager will
identify all long lead time items required for the successful completion of this project.
• Upon obtaining estimated delivery dates from the various vendors our team will
develop a timeline with clear milestones to track progress. Any delays that arise will
be addressed and communicated promptly to ensure that any potential negative
impacts to the schedule are mitigated.
• We will identify and select reliable suppliers for construction materials, tools, and
equipment, leveraging our established relationships to secure competitive pricing,
timely delivery, and high-quality products. We will ensure that all materials comply
with the CD’s.
• Regular inspections and quality checks are crucial during all phases of construction.
We will establish procedures to ensure that the work aligns with the design team’s
vision and meets Client expectations.
• Strict safety protocols will be implemented.
• Upon the successful completion of the project all O&M’s, warranty information, as-
built plans and any necessary maintenance training will be completed and turned
over to the Client.
BARISTO PARK PROPOSAL | EXPECTED RESULTS 10
GENERAL APPROACH
One of our responsibilities as the design-build team is to work closely with the
Board to help them identify, understand, and evaluate a wide array of considerations
that directly and indirectly shape their project. We have assembled a team of industry
professionals whose experience will help the Board navigate these decisions to best align
their vision and goals with project opportunities and constraints.
Several of these considerations include:
• Foot bridges, decorative fencing, new pathways, new landscaping, new
lighting, resurfacing basketball, entry signs, site furniture, possible shade
structures, water feature or splash pad, new bleachers with shade structure,
possibly resurfacing play areas and adding misters to new shade structures
and other amenities best suited to host the community needs for Baristo Park.
• Park operations, maintenance, management, and related considerations.
• Prioritization of facilities, capabilities, and amenities to align with budget
constraints.
• Strategies, selections, construction requirements, and creative opportunities
to best utilize project funding, honor time restrictions, and plan for future
potential.
VALUE-BASED DESIGN AND ENGINEERING
It is our team’s intent to develop the park while continually evaluating the project
for value throughout the course of the design, engineering and construction. Our team’s
collective experience and understanding of the Board’s priority to maximize value will
guide our materials selections, building systems evaluation, functional and operational
recommendations, and the like. We have found that projects are best served when value
decisions are revisited during the course of all phases of development. Our focus on
value is established in a detailed review meeting at the beginning of the project. Value is
measured in multiple ways and it is vital that the design responds to these priorities as
determined by the Board – cost/benefit, life-cycle, durability, capital/operational value,
and similar. It is critical to the success of any project to have project priorities, scope,
and budget aligned before significant design and engineering work commences. This
firmly establishes the target in advance and provides a clear baseline against which the
project design and decisions can be evaluated over the course of the entire project’s
development.
•
3. Expected
Results
BARISTO PARK PROPOSAL | EXPECTED RESULTS 11
PHASE 2: DESIGN
The deliverables for the work related to the Flood Channel would be:
• Cover Sheet
• Sections and details
• Bridge foundation design calculations
• Bridge general plans and foundation plans
• Bridge special provisions
The deliverables for the work related to the additional improvements to the park would be:
• Demolition Plans
• Grading Plans
• Vertical and Horizontal control
• Erosion Control Plans
• Bmp plans
• Storm Water quality management (if required)
• Landscape Site Construction Plans
• Enlarged plans, section and construction details
• Landscape Planting Plans, notes, details and Specifications
• Landscape Irrigation Plans, notes, details and Specifications,
• Electrical Plans, notes, details
• Single line Diagram, Calculations and Schedules
• Photometric lighting plan
• Submittal of encroachment applications to Riverside County as needed for
changes related to the Baristo Flood Control Chanel, including License Agreements
for maintenance of specific items.
• Submittal or plans as required to the City of Palm Springs.
PHASE 3: CONSTRUCTION, PURCHASING AND PROJECT MANAGEMENT
1. PROJECT MANAGEMENT
It will be the responsibility of the project team contractor to obtain all necessary
design encroachment permits, building permits, and health department permits
including those permits required by RCFC. The team will provide representation
semi-monthly (or as to be determined) for coordination meetings with the City’s
Staff at the City’s Community Service office. The purpose of these meetings will be
to report on the progress and to discuss and resolve any difficulties and issues.
Each month The Design-Build entity shall present a progress report to the City or the
board. Included will be a summary of the work accomplished during the preceding
month together with an account of any significant problems encountered. Total effort
expended by task broken down into the levels utilized and number of hours spent and
percent of project completion by task. Minutes of said meetings will be prepared and
delivered electronically to the City within five (5) working days from the meeting date.
Additional entities will be provided the meeting minutes as needed.
BARISTO PARK PROPOSAL | EXPECTED RESULTS 12
2. CONSTRUCTION SERVICES AND PURCHASING.
• Once the design and specifications are finalized, our team will obtain the required
permits and approvals from RCFC and the City of Palm Springs.
• We will develop a timeline with clear milestones to track progress. Our project
manager will ensure the project stays on schedule, and any delays are addressed
promptly.
• Regular inspections and quality checks are crucial during and after construction.
We will establish procedures to ensure that the work aligns with the design team’s
vision and meets client expectations.
• Strict safety protocols will be implemented to protect workers and ensure
compliance with OSHA regulations.
• We will identify and select reliable suppliers for construction materials, tools, and
equipment, leveraging our established relationships to secure competitive pricing,
timely delivery, and high-quality products.
• A detailed purchasing plan will be created to align with the project’s budget and
timeline.
• We will ensure that all materials comply with the necessary environmental and
regulatory standards.
3. PROJECT CLOSE-OUT AND AS-BUILT PLANS.
When the work is found to be substantially complete, we will have a final walk through
with the City and address any punchlist items needed. Once the City is satisfied with
the construction of the park, we will prepare as-built plans, record drawings and
perform an as-built survey as follows:
• The project design team will update the most current set of approved drawings
to incorporate record field modifications provided by the contractor and as
noted during the final walk of the site, including the appropriate record drawing
documentation as required by the City.
• Additionally, Altum will perform an as-built survey of existing field conditions and
structures on the property, showing encroachments into adjacent lots, if possible.
The as-built survey is for horizontal locations only and will not include vertical
elevations.
• The City will provide two hardcopy sets of the as-built plan and survey, as well as
digital plans on a USB drive in AutoCAD 14 or higher.
• It is understood that final construction acceptance by the City will not be granted
until the as-built plans have been received.
BARISTO PARK PROPOSAL | EXECUTIVES, STAFFING AND MANAGEMENT 13
4.Executives, Staffing
and Management
ERIK SIMMONS,
Three Peaks Corp., President,
State of California Licensed Contractor Type A, B, C-10, C-33
Erik is a graduate of California State University San Bernardino with a BA in
Entrepreneurial Management and a graduate of University of Redlands with a Master
of Business Administration. Prior to starting Three Peaks Corp., he worked for a home
builder and was responsible for the coordination of permits and approvals from various
municipalities and government agencies, construction document review, construction
estimates, preparing bid packages, implementing project controls, construction
coordination and project closeouts. Since founding Three Peaks Corp. in 2009 the
company has completed over 300 public works projects throughout Southern California.
Erik oversees all company operations.
THREE PEAKS CORP, GENERAL CONTRACTOR
RICHARD ALLEN,
Three Peaks Corp., Project Manager/ Head Estimator,
Richard is a graduate of California State University San Bernardino with a BS in
Economics and Business Administration with over 37 years of construction experience.
Prior to joining Three Peaks Corp., Richard managed and completed hundreds of
landscapes and park development projects for both private and public entities. Since
joining Three Peaks Corp. Richard has helped establish the company as a trusted leader
in park construction having completed over 30 park projects since 2019. Personally, his
most revered qualification is that every client he has worked with over those 37 years is
happy with the completed projects and can be used as a reference.
PROJECT MANAGEMENT
During all phases of development a project manager will be assigned to the
project for all aspects of the project. While managing their other projects they will attend
all required design meetings and coordinate with the design team providing input on
specifications, costs and lead times to ensure the projects success. Upon issuance of final
construction documents they will then manage the construction of the project to turnover.
FIRM STAFF CAPACITY:
34 Full Time Employees
DEDICATED STAFF:
• President
• Project Manager
BARISTO PARK PROPOSAL | EXECUTIVES, STAFFING AND MANAGEMENT 14
ANGELINA SOTELO, ASLA, LEED AP
Sotelo Landscape Architects
Principal, RLA #5254
Angelina is an active member of the ASLA and has been designing landscapes in
Southern California for over 20 years. With experience spanning more than 2,000
projects and numerous awards, her work has garnered widespread recognition.
In 2011, she founded Sotelo Landscape Architects, where she leads a talented
design team with global expertise, enriched by diverse academic, artistic, and
environmental backgrounds. Her firm integrates specialized knowledge into a
collaborative design process that extends beyond the office, fostering strong
relationships with clients and consultants to meet even the most demanding time
and budget requirements. Her team values open communication, integrity, and
are committed to upholding both our design principles and our clients’ values
throughout every project.
SOTELO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS, LEAD DESIGNER
Angelina Sotelo will serve as the primary contact for your project, personally
handling the design, attending meetings, and overseeing its progress. Additionally,
a dedicated Project Manager will be assigned to coordinate documentation and
supervise production. Our Project Manager, currently based in Palm Desert, will
be readily available to visit the site during construction and assist contractors in
maintaining the design intent throughout the process.
FIRM STAFF CAPACITY:
10 Full Time Employees
DEDICATED STAFF:
• Principal ($200hr)
• 1 Project Manager ($150 hr)
• 1 Irrigation Designer ($120 hr)
• 2 Project Designers ($100 hr)
• 1 Draftsperson ($80 hr)
BARISTO PARK PROPOSAL | EXECUTIVES, STAFFING AND MANAGEMENT 15
GREG KUMP, PE, QSD
Michael Baker International
Senior Associate - Land Development
With extensive engineering leadership in public and private sectors, his expertise
includes streets, sewer, water, drainage systems, and hydraulic design. He has a
strong background in navigating local, state, and federal permitting processes and
providing cost estimating services while overseeing projects to ensure they meet
design specifications and quality standards. Specializing in parks and recreation
faciliries, his typical involvement in park development includes tasks such as prepar-
ing detailed topographic maps, master plans, conceptual designs, and construction
plans, as well as providing contract administration and overseeing construction. He
has ample experience working with Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conser-
vation District (RCFC&WCD).
MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL,
CIVIL, STRUCTURAL & GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING
FIRM STAFF CAPACITY:
4,500 Full Time Employees
DEDICATED STAFF:
• 1 Project Manager ($270 hr)
• 1 Senior Bridge Engineer ($262 hr)
• 1 Technical Manager ($225hr)
• 1 Project Engineer ($180 hr)
• 1 Bridge Engineer ($170 hr)
SOFIA E. LANDIS, P.E.
Michael Baker International
Senior Engineer / Project Manager
Civil Engineer with expertise in project management and technical design, including
prestressed precast concrete bridges, post-tensioned bridges, concrete retaining
walls, and MSE walls. Experienced in various delivery methods, including Design-Build
and traditional Design-Bid-Build. Skilled in preparing planning documents, PS&E, and
providing construction support. Also serves as an owner’s representative, preparing
bridging documents and cost estimates to assist with programming.
BARISTO PARK PROPOSAL | EXECUTIVES, STAFFING AND MANAGEMENT 16
MICHAEL RIZZA, PE, RCDD, CTS-D, LEED AP
Rizza Engineering, Inc.
Principal and President / CEO
Michael has over 25 years of experience in electrical engineering and lighting design.
As a licensed Professional Engineer in 11 states, he is known for his dedication to client
relationships and his expertise in building design. With a background as an electrical
contractor, he effectively visualizes installations and communicates ideas to create
practical solutions for his team.
As a skilled team leader responsible for overseeing the project team and dealing with
contractual issues, clients appreciate his ability for listening to requirements and
recommend solutions that technically and financially benefit the project. His technical
knowledge of Power Distribution & Generation, Lighting Design & Controls, and Low
Voltage Systems craft a turn-key electrical package. His passion for sustainability and
energy efficiency has led him to become a LEED Accredited Professional. Flexible and
innovative designs provide owners with the ability to adapt their facilities for future
changes.
RIZZA ENGINEERING
ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING
FIRM STAFF CAPACITY:
4,500 Full Time Employees
DEDICATED STAFF:
• Principal ($230 hr)
• 1 Associate ($205 hr)
• 1 Engineer ($160 hr)
• 1 Lighting Designer ($150 hr)
BARISTO PARK PROPOSAL | COMMUNICATION & EQUIPMENT 17
Three Peaks Corp. utilizes Autodesk Build to manage their projects. This ensures
open communication between the office and the field. Their systems safeguard and
ensure superior quality, code compliance, coordination of drawings and specifications.
Three Peaks’ field personnel are trained to employ quality work which prevent re-work,
condense schedules and provide the communities in which we work with a high-quality
product.
Design quality control is a significant part of their long history of successful
projects and the process is reflected in the chart below. They work with all stakeholders
early on to ensure budgets, schedules, and expectations are agreed upon and clearly
communicated. Designs are created and continuously measured against these definitions
of success to ensure a proper outcome and follow through is achieved with minimal
surprises. They recognize that though each design phase is evaluated differently, it’s
important to revisit the initial goals and objectives. Regular communication will be
maintained with all parties to assess the current project trajectory and plan for effective
counter measures as challenges or changes arise.
During the design phase, the team will hold regular meetings, share documents
via a cloud platform, and present progress drawings and exhibits to the board. This
approach ensures a smooth and collaborative design process.
5.
Communication
Three Peaks Corp. maintains an compliant fleet of equipment. They maintain crews of
multi-trade talented employees. Their owned equipment includes:
• Dump trucks
• Water trucks
• Excavators
• Track loaders
• Skid Steers
• Scrapers
• Asphalt paver
• Various compaction equipment
Any additional equipment needs will be provided through thei vast network of rental
company partners.
6.
Equipment
BARISTO PARK PROPOSAL | COMMUNICATION & EQUIPMENT 18
PHASE 2. DESIGN TOTAL $283,850.00
2A. DEVELOP PLANS
2A.A. CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS FOR WORK
RELATED TO BARISTO CHANNEL $95,850.00
• CIVIL, STRUCTURAL AND GEOTECHNICAL $75,100.00
Bridge Foundation Design Calculations $19,500.00
Bridge General Plans and Foundation Plans $39,900.00
Bridge Special Provisions and QA/QC $15,700.00
• LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT $12,750.00
Site Construction Plans, Notes & Details $2,500.00
Enlarged Plans, Sections & Details $7,000.00
Submittal Package to RCFC $3,250.00
• ELECTRICAL ENGINEER $4,000.00
Electrical Plans, Notes, Details, Diagrams,
Calculations and Schedules $4,000.00
• GENERAL CONTRACTOR & PROJECT MANAGER $4,000.00
Coordination $4,000.00
2A.B. CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS FOR ADDITIONAL
IMPROVEMENTS $172,000.00
CIVIL AND STRUCTURAL $82,100.00
Cover Sheet $3,500.00
Sections $3,500.00
Details $2,200.00
Grading Studies $5,800.00
Grading Plans $6,800.00
Site ADA Analysis $1,900.00
Vertical Control $19,500.00
Horizontal Control $7,800.00
Erosion Control Plans $2,500.00
BMP Plan $3,500.00
Storm Water Quality Management Plan $7,800.00
Meetings $7,000.00
Project Coordination $10,300.00
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT $57,400.00
Site Construction Plans, Notes & Details $5,400.00
Enlarged Plans, Sections & Details $12,000.00
7.Expense
Breakdown
BARISTO PARK PROPOSAL | COMMUNICATION & EQUIPMENT 19
Planting Plans, Notes, Details & Specifications $5,000.00
Irrigation Plans, Notes, Details & Specifications $5,000.00
Site Furniture Selection $3,500.00
Landscape Lighting Layout & Coordination $3,500.00
3D Modeling $4,000.00
Submittal Documentation $7,000.00
Assist in Cost Estimate $2,000.00
Value Engineering $7,000.00
Meetings and Coordination $3,000.00
ELECTRICAL ENGINEER $8,000.00
Electrical Plans, Notes, Details, Diagrams,
Calculations and Schedules $8,000.00
GENERAL CONTRACTOR / PROJECT MANAGER $2,500.00
Coordination $2,500.00
2B. SUBMITTAL PLANS FOR APPROVAL $16,000.00
2B.A. RIVERSIDE COUNTY REGARDING
BARISTO FLOOD ESTIMATE $8,000.00
Submit Encroachment Permit Application to
Riverside County as needed for changes related
to the Baristo Flood Control Channel
2B.B. CITY OF PALM SPRINGS ESTIMATE $8,000.00
Submit Plans as Required to the
City of Palm Springs
DESIGN ALTERNATE: RESTROOMS ADDITIONAL $37,500.00
Architectural Services $22,000.00
Structural Engineering Services $5,250.00
Mechanical, Plumbing, Electrical, T-24 Services $5,250.00
Additional Coordination $5,000.00
BARISTO PARK PROPOSAL | COMMUNICATION & EQUIPMENT 20
PHASE 3. CONSTRUCTION, PURCHASING
AND PROJECT MANAGEMENT $2,895,725.50
3A. CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION $95,900.00
• CIVIL AND STRUCTURAL $61,800.00
Meetings $14,500.00
Coordination Meetings $9,700.00
Constrution RFIs & Submittals $29,700.00
Project Closeout $5,900.00
Construction Site Visits $2,000.00
• LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT $16,000.00
Meetings
Coordination Meetings
Constrution RFIs & Submittals
Project Closeout
Construction Site Visits
• ELECTRICAL ENGINEER $3,600.00
3B. PROJECT MANAGEMENT $260,000.00
3C.CONSTRUCTION AND PURCHASING ESTIMATE $2,539,825.50
Qty. Unit Price Total
1. Remove Chain Link and Replace
with Decorative Fence at RCFC 1050 $185.00 $194,250.00
2. Second Guard Rail or Planted
Hedge for Grade Change 160 $115.00 $18,400.00
3. New Overhead Entry Sign 1 $85,000.00 $85,000.00
4. New Lawn and Irrigation 25,300 $4.40 $111,320.00
5. New Desert Planting and Drip
Irrigation 12,800 $15.50 $198,400.00
6. Extended Lawn Near Bridge 700 $4.20 $2,940.00
7. Shade and Playground,
Protect in Place 1 $ - $ -
8. New Colored Concrete Paths
with Top Cast Finish (Includes
Demolition of Existing). 10,015 $17.70 $177,265.00
9. Multi Use Trail at RCFC
Maintenance Road 13,116 $6.25 $81,975.00
10. New Foot Bridges with Possible
Grate Floor 2 $215,575.00 $431,150.00
BARISTO PARK PROPOSAL | COMMUNICATION & EQUIPMENT 21
11. Splash Pad (2,000 SF) 1 $700,000.00 $700,000.00
12. Picnic Tables (3) with Shade
Structures (3) 3 $57,000.00 $171,000.00
13. Event Pad with Shade
Structure (1000 SF) 1 $75,000.00 $75,000.00
14. Historic Marker Monument 1 $12,000.00 $12,000.00
15. New Light Fixtures with Footings 8 $10,800.00 $86,400.00
16. New Precast Concrete Benches 9 $2,850.00 $25,650.00
17. Resurface Basketball Court
with Minor Grading 1 $43,000.00 $43,000.00
18. Shade Structure at Basketball
Court with Bleachers 1 $60,000.00 $60,000.00
19. Remove Chain Link and
Replace with Decorative
Fence at Property Line 285 $215.00 $61,275.00
20. Bollards 4 $1,200.00 $4,800.00
CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION
ALTERNATE: RESTROOMS ADDITIONAL $37,500.00
Architectural Services $14,500.00
Structural Engineering Services $7,000.00
Mechanical, Plumbing, Electrical, T-24 Services $1,750.00
Additional Coordination $4,000.00
CONSTRUCTION & PURCHASING
ALTERNATE: RUBBER PLAY SURFACING ADDITIONAL $104,760.00
Qty: 3,600, Unit Price: $29.10
CONSTRUCTION & PURCHASING
ALTERNATE: 2ND OVERHEAD SIGN STRUCTURE ADDITIONAL $85,000.00
Qty: 1, Unit Price: $85,000.00
CONSTRUCTION & PURCHASING
ALTERNATE: ADDITIONAL MISTERS TO
SHADE STRUCTURES ADDITIONAL $11,000.00
Qty: 1, Unit Price: $11,000.00
CONSTRUCTION & PURCHASING
ALTERNATE: RESTROOMS ADDITIONAL $750,000.00
Qty: 1, Unit Price: $750,000.00
BARISTO PARK PROPOSAL | EXPENSE SUMMARY 22
PHASE 2. DESIGN $283,850.00
2A. DEVELOP PLANS $267,850.00
2A.A. Construction Documents for Work
Related to Baristo Channel $95,850.00
2A.B. Construction Documents for Additional
Improvements $172,000.00
2B. SUBMITTAL PLANS FOR APPROVAL ESTIMATED FEE $16,000.00
DESIGN ALTERNATE: RESTROOMS ADDITIONAL $37,500.00
PHASE 3. CONSTRUCTION, PURCHASING AND
PROJECT MANAGEMENT $2,895,725.50
3A. Construction Administration $95,900.00
3B. Construction & Purchasing Estimated Cost $2,539.825.50
3C. Alternates Estimated Cost $200,760.00
3D. Project Management $260,000.00
CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION
ALTERNATE: RESTROOMS ADDITIONAL $37,500.00
CONSTRUCTION & PURCHASING
ALTERNATE: RUBBER PLAY SURFACING ADDITIONAL $104,760.00
CONSTRUCTION & PURCHASING
ALTERNATE: 2ND OVERHEAD SIGN STRUCTURE ADDITIONAL $85,000.00
CONSTRUCTION & PURCHASING
ALTERNATE: ADDITIONAL MISTERS TO
SHADE STRUCTURES ADDITIONAL $11,000.00
CONSTRUCTION & PURCHASING
ALTERNATE: RESTROOMS ADDITIONAL $750,000.00
8.Expense
Summary
BARISTO PARK PROPOSAL | LICENSING, BONDING & INSURANCE 23
a. CSLB: 941528 -A, B, C-10, C-33 EXP. 12/31/2025
b. Rule 403.1 Coachella Valley Fugitive Dust Control Training
c. Bonding Capabilities: 10MM Single Project, 20MM Aggregate
9.Licensing
and Bonding
a. General Liability: 1MM/ 2MM
b. Automobile Liability: 1MM
c. Umbrella Liability: 4MM/4MM
d. Workers Compensation: 1MM
e. Inland Marine: 250K
10.
Insurance
BARISTO PARK PROPOSAL | LICENSING, BONDING & INSURANCE 24
AGUA CALIENTE CULTURAL MUSEUM
SOTELO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
The Agua Caliente Cultural Plaza in Palm Springs,
California, is a significant cultural center dedicated to
the history, heritage, and contemporary culture of the
Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians. Opened in 2023,
the plaza serves as both a tribute and a living museum,
showcasing the traditions, art, and history of the Cahuilla
people.
The design of the Agua Caliente Cultural Plaza is deeply
connected to the surrounding desert landscape and
Cahuilla cultural symbols. It incorporates a Plaza for
cultural events and an Oasis Trail with native plants and
features water elements, drawing attention to the tribe’s
enduring relationship with nature. It serves as a place of
learning, wellness, and cultural exchange for both tribal
members and the public.
REFERENCES:
Dan Malcolm, AICP
Director of Planning
Phone: 760-883-1945
Email: dmalcolm@aguacaliente-nsn.gov
Bill Jeorling
Senior Project Manager JCJ Architecture
Phone: 602-909-3975
Email: bjeorling@jcj.com
11.
Project References
BARISTO PARK PROPOSAL | LICENSING, BONDING & INSURANCE 25
OTAY RANCH PARKS,
SOTELO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
Situated in the heart of Otay Ranch, we designed four
parks inspired by the charm of small-town America and the
elegance of 20th-century parks. These parks feature state-of-
the-art play structures, welcoming entry porticos, and shaded
seating areas with tables and benches beneath graceful
pergolas. Orchards line the main entrances, while winding paths
and gently rolling lawns encourage both active and leisurely
activities. Lush border plantings further enhance the serene
atmosphere. These parks were created as a Principal and
Project Manager of David Reed Landscape Architects.
REFERENCES:
David Reed ASLA
David Reed Landscape Architects
david@drasla.com
(619) 971-1962
Don Ross, Project Manager
The Otay Ranch Company
(619) 397-1641
BARISTO PARK PROPOSAL | LICENSING, BONDING & INSURANCE 26
MICHAEL S. WOLFSON PARK
THREE PEAKS CORP
Dedicated on November 26, 1986, Michael S. Wolfson
Park is located at DaVall and Frank Sinatra Drives on a one-acre,
triangular-shaped parcel adjacent to the trails system and the
Whitewater Wash. This Park follows a Victorian Theme, featuring
a fountain, decorative lighting fixtures, benches, a Braille-
marked trail and a fragrance garden. A recorded “welcome”
from Dinah Shore and Frank Sinatra, who lived nearby, may be
heard at the entrance to the park.
REFERENCES:
City of Rancho Mirage
Charles Nesbit
ADA Coordinator
charelsn@ranchomirageca.gov
Phone: (760) 285-0244
BARISTO PARK PROPOSAL | LICENSING, BONDING & INSURANCE 27
MECCA SPORTS COMPLEX,
THREE PEAKS CORP.
Three Peaks teamed with HDG on the construction of
Mecca Sports Park, HDG was responsible for the design that
would provide the under-served community of Mecca with an
exciting new park. The California Outdoor Access for All Initiative,
the County of Riverside, and CDBG provided the necessary
funding that would bring the Mecca community’s vision to
fruition. The Park design included amenities that the community
deemed as needed and desired through a series of community
workshops. The Park design features the following amenities:
a sports fields, splash pad, sand volleyball courts, play and
picnic areas, and a kiosk for special events. Additionally, a
restroom and concession building will provide the park with the
opportunity to offer food service to visitors.
REFERENCES:
References:
County of Riverside
Anna Rodriguez
760-863-2537
aarodriguez@rivco.org
44199 Monroe Street, Suite B
Indio, CA 92201
BARISTO PARK PROPOSAL | PROJECT REFERENCES 28
KELVIN PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE PROJECT,
MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL
The project included preliminary evaluation, design,
and construction of a multi us path and pedestrian bridge over
Barranca Channel, owned and operated by Orange County
Flood Control District (OCFCD).
Michael Baker performed a feasibility study, which
documented the existing conditions, evaluated future
considerations for the OCFCD channel, explored feasible bridge
alternatives, and documented total future construction costs for
the project moving forward. The feasibility study also explored
the necessary permits, right of way, and steps toward obtaining
environmental clearance for the project.
As part of the subsequent phase, the Michael Baker
team designed the joint use path and bridge spanning the
Barranca Channel: a 60-ft long prefabricated metal truss bridge
with cast-in-place abutments on spread footings.
BARISTO PARK PROPOSAL
Thank you!
From:City of Palm Springs
To:Melissa Sanchez
Subject:*NEW SUBMISSION* Measure J Community Initiated Projects Application Form
Date:Monday, September 30, 2024 4:48:24 PM
NOTICE: This message originated outside of The City of Palm Springs -- DO NOT CLICK on links or open attachments
unless you are sure the content is safe.
Measure J Community Initiated Projects Application Form
Submission #:3519544
IP Address:72.132.245.140
Submission Date:09/30/2024 4:48
Survey Time:3 minutes, 45 seconds
You have a new online form submission.
Note: all answers displaying "*****" are marked as sensitive and must be viewed after your login.
Measure J Community Initiated Projects Application Form
Date Submitted
09/30/2024 12:00 AM
Project Name
Baristo Park Improvements
Project Address
439 TAN OAK DR
PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA 92262
Applicant Name
ned barker
Applicant's Phone Number
(760) 898-9192
Applicant's Email
admin@baristops.com
Name of Organization (if applicable)
baristo neighborhood organization
Applicant Type
Neighborhood
Non-Profit Organization's - Provide Federal Tax ID#
see the application pdf
Project Type
Organizational - Implemented Project (Grant)
Tell us about your project:
1. Does this project improve…? (check all that apply)
Business Community
Downtown Enhancements
Educational Services
Government Services
Health Services
Historic Preservation
Park/Recreation/Hiking Facilities
Police/Fire/Emergency Services
Public Art
Streets/Roads
Sustainability/Conservation
Technology
The Economy
Tourism
Other:
2. What demographic(s) does this project serve? (check all that apply)
Animal Welfare
Children/Students
Entire Palm Springs Community
Individuals with Disabilities
LGBTQ+
Seniors
Other:
3. Complete the attached Project Overview and Cost Worksheet. This should provide a thorough description of
your proposed project including why it is a need, who will benefit, what the project entails, where the project is
located, etc. Further, describe any substantive discussions or endorsements you have developed with City staff,
commissions, or active volunteer groups to shape your proposal and to identify any potential duplication of
efforts. For example, if your project is an improvement to a park, have you explored your ideas with the Parks
and Recreation Department or its Commission?
Applicant's Name and Date
see our attachments
Project Overview and Cost Worksheet
Project Name and Location
Baristo Park Improvements
Provide a detailed description of the concept and benefits of your proposal
see the attachments
Describe and identify any substantive discussions or endorsements you have developed with City staff,
commissions, or volunteer groups to shape your proposal and to identify any potential duplication of efforts
see the attachments
Design/Consulting Costs
see the attachments
Equipment/Materials Costs
see the attachments
Construction Costs (identify cost allocation for major trades, if available)
see the attachments
Insurance Cost
see the attachments
Other Fees
see the attachments
Contingency
see the attachments
Total
see the attachments
Project Duration, including lead time to order materials and mobilize contractors
see the attachments
Designated Project Manager
see the attachments
For organizational implemented grants, identify your other funding sources to complete the project and the
percentage of total this represents
see the attachments
Applicant's Name and Date
see the attachments
Thank you,
City of Palm Springs
This is an automated message generated by Granicus. Please do not reply directly to this email.