Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutITEM 2A - Casa Verona PC 9-11-24 Planning Commission Staff Report DATE: SEPTEMBER 11, 2024 PUBLIC HEARING SUBJECT: REQUEST BY MARK TEMPLE, OWNER REQUESTING A TWO (2) YEAR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP (TTM) 38042 TO SUBDIVIDE ONE (1) LOT INTO THIRTY-ONE (31) SINGLE- FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOTS LOCATED AT THE EAST TERMINUS OF VERONA ROAD, ZONE R-1-E; (CASE TTM 38042 TE) (GM) FROM: Department of Planning Services SUMMARY The Planning Commission will consider a two-year (2) time extension request for a previously approved Tentative Tract Map (TTM 38042) to subdivide one (1) lot into thirty-one (31) single-family residential lots named Casa Verona. The project was previously approved by the Planning Commission on September 14, 2022. RECOMMENDATION: 1. Approve a two (2) year extension of time for Tentative Tract Map (38042). PRIOR ACTIONS: Related Relevant City Actions by Planning, Fire, Building, etc… 09/14/2022 The Planning Commission approved Resolution #6922 recommending approval to the City Council for a Change of Zone to R-1-E; adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration per CEQA; and a Tentative Tract Map (TTM 38042) to subdivide one lot into thirty-one (31) single-family lots. 10/13/2022 The City Council approved a Change of Zone to R-1-E for the property known as Casa Verona at the East terminus of Verona Road. Most Recent Ownership 05/12/2006 Mark Temple Property Posting None Not Required Notification 08/29/2024 Notice of public hearing mailed to addresses within 500-feet of the site, notifying that the subject application would be considered by the Planning Commission at a public hearing on September 11, 2024. The public Planning Commission Staff Report September 11, 2024 -- Page 2 of 6 Case TTM 80042 – Time Extension – Casa Verona hearing notice was also emailed to Neighborhood Organizations within one mile of the project site. Field Check 08/2024 Staff visited site to observe existing conditions Details of Application Request Site and Building Area Over All Site 6.44-acres Surrounding Property Existing Land Use Per Chapter 92 Existing General Plan Designation Existing Zoning Designation Subject Property Undeveloped LDR R-1-D North Vacant LDR PDD 315 South Vacant LDR R-1-D East Watercourse OS - W W West Single-Family VLDR R-1-C PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The overall project was approved as a Change of Zone to the R-1-E zone; adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration per CEQA; and a Tentative Tract Map (TTM 38042) to subdivide one (1) lot into thirty-one (31) single-family residential lots. In order to exercise the TTM entitlements, the applicant is required to final the Tract Map within two (2) years of the project approval date. Alternatively, an extension of time may be granted by the Planning Commission in accordance with the procedures outlined in Section 94.12.00 of the Zoning Code. The applicant seeks approval of a one-year extension of time for the TTM approval. Site Location: Planning Commission Staff Report September 11, 2024 -- Page 3 of 6 Case TTM 80042 – Time Extension – Casa Verona BACKGROUND AND SETTING: The applicant, Mark Temple, received approval by the Planning Commission and City Council to change the current zoning designation of single-family residential R-1-D (7,500-square foot lot) to R-1-E (5,000-square foot lot). The proposal included a tentative tract map to subdivide the 6.44-acre parcel into thirty-one (31) lots for future development. There were no building elevations proposed as part of the application; any proposed buildings on the lots will be reviewed under a separate application in the future. The applicant is seeking a two (2) year extension of time for a Tentative Tract Map (TTM 38042) to subdivide one lot into thirty-one (31) single-family lots per the R-1-E zoning. One September 14, 2022, the Planning Commission adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration per CEQA; approved the Tentative Tract Map (38042) and recommended approval for a Change of Zone to the City Council. The City Council approved the Change of Zone on October 13, 2022. At the time of the entitlements, the site was undeveloped and remains vacant. The time limit for filing of a final map per the conditions of approval is two (2) years from the effective date of the original Planning Commission approval which was on September 14, 2022. As of the writing of this report, a final map has not been filed with the City Engineering Department. ANALYSIS: Extension of Time Request: REQUIRED FINDINGS: Palm Springs Zoning Code (PSZC) Section 94.12.00 establishes guidelines relative to the “Extension of Time” and sets forth procedures and criteria for approving these requests. The applicant submitted responses to these criteria – see Attached letter. Staff evaluated the request and provided an analysis of its conformance to these criteria below. 1. The requested extension of time is consistent with the General Plan and any applicable specific plan, and the proposed project remains consistent with those plans as they exist at the time the extension request is being considered; The subject property is designated “Low Density Residential (LDR)” by the General Plan Land Use Map. The LDR designation is described as “Representing typical single-family detached residential development with a density 4.1 to 6.0 dwelling units per acre”. The LDR land use is intended for single-family residential on lot sizes permitted in the R-1-E to R-1-C zones. The City of Palm Springs General Plan provides a Planning Commission Staff Report September 11, 2024 -- Page 4 of 6 Case TTM 80042 – Time Extension – Casa Verona series of goals and objectives in the Housing Element and the approved TTM will further advance the following: • Goal HS1 – Facilitate a broad range of housing types, prices, and opportunities to address current and future housing needs in the community. o HS1 – Provide adequate residential sites to accommodate new housing through land use, zoning, and specific plan designations. o HS 1.4 – Review and revise development standards as available land continues to diminish and housing demands increases, the City will need to consider higher density housing opportunities, particularly on underutilized land. The approval of a one-year time extension of the TTM will allow the applicant to finalize the map for future development that utilizes smaller lots and increases density meeting the General Plan goals stated and the finding is met. 2. The findings made in support of the original approval remain valid and are still appropriate; The Planning Commission adopted Resolution #6922 on September 14, 2022 for the TTM and the project’s layout, design and overall scope have not changed, and the proposal remains compatible with existing developments in the surrounding areas. Thus, the findings made in support of the original approval remain valid and appropriate and this finding has been met. 3. There have been no significant changes to the proposed project, or to areas within the geographic proximity of the proposed project that negates the appropriateness of the project, or new information concerning new or substantially more severe environmental effects which would require a reevaluation of the project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); There have been no significant changes to the surrounding area negating the previous CEQA determination. The proposed Casa Verona site remains unchanged with the Serena Park development anticipated to move forward in the near future and other potential developments in the immediate area. There is no new information available to negate the appropriateness of the project, nor is there new information concerning new or substantially more severe environmental effects which would require a reevaluation of the project under CEQA. This finding has been met. 4. The subject site has been properly maintained in accordance with the Property Maintenance Standards of this Title; The site remains a vacant open lot and has been treated with a chemical sealant that suppresses dust particles from becoming airborne. There are no active code enforcement cases for the vacant lot, and the owner has maintained the site in a reasonable clean and debris free state and this finding has been met. Planning Commission Staff Report September 11, 2024 -- Page 5 of 6 Case TTM 80042 – Time Extension – Casa Verona 5. The applicant has demonstrated convincingly and clearly that the project will be substantially underway within the extended period. The applicant’s internal work has been underway in the two (2) years since the entitlements were granted. Meetings have taken place with the City Engineering Department to develop an appropriate water and sewer system that will meet the challenging topography at the site. The fact that substantial money has been spent on preparing water and sewer plans shows that the project is advancing and will be substantially underway within the two (2) year period, therefore, this finding can be met. 6. The applicant has made reasonable, substantial and timely efforts to exercise the entitlement and advance the project, such as, but not limited to, the pre- payment of impact fees or submittal of permit applications. As noted above, the applicant and City should have final water and sewer plans finalized soon and grading of the site is anticipated to begin within the next year with the submission of a Major Development and Major Architectural applications to be reviewed by the Planning Commission, and Architectural Review Committee. The actions are substantial moving the project forward. 7. Extenuating circumstances, not within the applicant’s control, (financial inability and market conditions excepted), have prevented the applicant from exercising the entitlement within the initial time period granted, but that such circumstances are more likely than not to be removed in time for the applicant to substantially begin the project within the extended period. The applicant states that project has not moved forward because of sewer lift system required on the negatively sloping site. The extension of time will allow for more time to overcome these issues and will fully bring the project to development. The City is aware of difficulties in developing in this area relative to water and sewer service. Other projects have experienced similar delays and hardships, and the finding has been met. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: The Planning Commission adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) at the meeting on September 14, 2022. The initial study determined that potential significant adverse impacts existed, and mitigation measures relative to Biological Resources and Cultural Resources would reduce the project impacts to less than significant. CONCLUSION: The applicant has demonstrated very clearly that significant efforts are being made to move the project forward by working with the City Engineering Department on water and sewer plans on the challenging site topography, plus has hired an architect to develop floor plans and building elevations. The applicant states that with the granting of the time extension, movement on the adjacent Serena Park community, and anticipated Planning Commission Staff Report September 11, 2024 -- Page 6 of 6 Case TTM 80042 – Time Extension – Casa Verona lower interest rates, the project will receive financing and move forward; therefore, Staff recommends that the Planning Commission grant a one-year extension of time. PREPARED BY: Glenn Mlaker, AICP – Associate Planner REVIEWED BY: Edward Robertson – Principal Planner REVIEWED BY: Chris Hadwin – Planning Director Attachments: 1. Vicinity Map 2. Resolution 3. Planning Commission Resolution #6922 4. Letter from Applicant 5. Tentative Tract Map #38042 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA APPROVING A TWO (2) YEAR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR CASE NO. TENTATIVE TRACT MAP (TTM 38042) TO SUBDIVIDE ONE (1) PARCEL INTO THIRTY-ONE (31) SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTAL LOTS LOCATED AT THE EAST TERMINUS OF VERONA ROAD, ZONE R-1-E, APN 677-020-032. THE PLANNING COMMISSION FINDS AND DETERMINES AS FOLLOWS: A. Mark Temple, Owner (“Applicant”) filed an application with the City, pursuant to Section 94.12.00 of the Zoning Code, for a two (2) year extension of time for the entitlement associated with Case No. TTM 38042, for the subdivision on one (1) lot into thirty-one (31) single-family residential lots located at the east terminus of Verona Road. (“the Project”). B. On September 14, 2022, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the Project and adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration and approved a Change of Zone application to rezone the parcel to R-1-E zone and a Tentative Tract Map (38042) to subdivide the parcel into thirty-one single-family residential lots. C. A notice of public hearing of the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Springs to consider the Extension of Time for Case No. TTM 38042 was given in accordance with applicable law. D. On September 11, 2024, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the extension of time request for Case No. TTM 38042 in accordance with applicable law. E. The proposed development is considered a “project” pursuant to the guidelines of the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”). The Planning Commission adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) at the meeting of September 14, 2022. The initial study determined that potential significant adverse impacts existed, and mitigation measures relative to Biological Resources and Cultural Resources would reduce the project impacts to less than significant. F. In accordance with the procedures and requirements of Section 94.12.00 of the Zoning Code, the Commission has evaluated the required findings and agrees with each as follows: 1. The requested extension of time is consistent with the General Plan and any applicable specific plan, and the proposed project remains consistent with those plans as they exist at the time the extension request is being considered; Planning Commission Resolution No. September 11, 2024 Time Extension of Case Nos. TTM 38042 Page 2 of 4 The subject property is designated “Low Density Residential (LDR)” by the General Plan Land Use Map. The LDR designation is described as “Representing typical single-family detached residential development with a density 4.1 to 6.0 dwelling units per acre”. The LDR land use is intended for single-family residential on lot sizes permitted in the R-1-E to R-1-C zones. The City of Palm Springs General Plan provides a series of goals and objectives in the Housing Element and the approved TTM will further advance the following: • Goal HS1 – Facilitate a broad range of housing types, prices, and opportunities to address current and future housing needs in the community. o HS1 – Provide adequate residential sites to accommodate new housing through land use, zoning, and specific plan designations. o HS 1.4 – Review and revise development standards as available land continues to diminish and housing demands increases, the City will need to consider higher density housing opportunities, particularly on underutilized land. The approval of a one-year time extension of the TTM will allow the applicant to finalize the map for future development that utilizes smaller lots and increases density meeting the General Plan goals stated and the finding is met. 2. The findings made in support of the original approval remain valid and are still appropriate; The Planning Commission adopted Resolution #6922 on September 14, 2022 for the TTM and the project’s layout, design and overall scope have not changed, and the proposal remains compatible with existing developments in the surrounding areas. Thus, the findings made in support of the original approval remain valid and appropriate and this finding has been met. 3. There have been no significant changes to the proposed project, or to areas within the geographic proximity of the proposed project that negates the appropriateness of the project, or new information concerning new or substantially more severe environmental effects which would require a reevaluation of the project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); There have been no significant changes to the surrounding area negating the previous CEQA determination. The proposed Casa Verona site remains unchanged with the Serena Park development anticipated to move forward in the near future and other potential developments in the immediate area. There is no new information available to negate the appropriateness of the project, nor is there new information concerning new or substantially more severe Planning Commission Resolution No. September 11, 2024 Time Extension of Case Nos. TTM 38042 Page 3 of 4 environmental effects which would require a reevaluation of the project under CEQA. This finding has been met. 4. The subject site has been properly maintained in accordance with the Property Maintenance Standards of this Title; The site remains a vacant open lot and has been treated with a chemical sealant that suppresses dust particles from becoming airborne. There are no active code enforcement cases for the vacant lot, and the owner has maintained the site in a reasonable clean and debris free state and this finding has been met. 5. The applicant has demonstrated convincingly and clearly that the project will be substantially underway within the extended period. The applicant’s internal work has been underway in the two (2) years since the entitlements were granted. Meetings have taken place with the City Engineering Department to develop an appropriate water and sewer system that will meet the challenging topography at the site. The fact that substantial money has been spent on preparing water and sewer plans shows that the project is advancing and will be substantially underway within the two (2) year period, therefore, this finding can be met. 6. The applicant has made reasonable, substantial and timely efforts to exercise the entitlement and advance the project, such as, but not limited to, the pre- payment of impact fees or submittal of permit applications. As noted above, the applicant and City should have final water and sewer plans finalized soon and grading of the site is anticipated to begin within the next year with the submission of a Major Development and Major Architectural applications to be reviewed by the Planning Commission, and Architectural Review Committee. The actions are substantial moving the project forward. 7. Extenuating circumstances, not within the applicant’s control, (financial inability and market conditions excepted), have prevented the applicant from exercising the entitlement within the initial time period granted, but that such circumstances are more likely than not to be removed in time for the applicant to substantially begin the project within the extended period. The applicant states that project has not moved forward because of sewer lift system required on the negatively sloping site. The extension of time will allow for more time to overcome these issues and will fully bring the project to development. The City is aware of difficulties in developing in this area relative to water and sewer service. Other projects have experienced similar delays and hardships, and the finding has been met. Planning Commission Resolution No. September 11, 2024 Time Extension of Case Nos. TTM 38042 Page 4 of 4 G. The Planning Commission has carefully reviewed and considered all of the evidence presented in connection with the hearing on the time extension including, but not limited to, the staff report, and all written and oral testimony presented. THE PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVES: Section 1. That the findings and determinations reflected above are true and correct and are incorporated by this reference herein as the cause and foundation for the action taken by and through this Resolution. Section 2. Based on the foregoing, the Planning Commission hereby approves the one (1) year extension of time request for the Project, thereby extending the approval from September 11, 2024 to September 10, 2026. Section 3. This action is not subject to CEQA pursuant to Section 15270 of the CEQA Guidelines. ADOPTED this 11th day of September, 2024. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA _________________________________ Christopher Hadwin Director of Planning Services 5865 SF 5400 SF 5400 SF 5400 SF 5400 SF 5400 SF 5400 SF 5400 SF 5400 SF 5405 SF 5940 SF 6490 SF 10523 SF 8733 SF 10673 SF 6076 SF5795 SF6290 SF 6030 SF 5146 SF 5146 SF 5315 SF 7147 SF 6472 SF 5444 SF5340 SF5325 SF5311 SF5296 SF5281 SF6014 SF PAD=481.2 PAD=481.3 PAD=481.1 PAD=481.2 PAD=481.5 PAD=481.8 PAD=482.0 PAD=482.3 PAD=482.6 PAD=483.0 PAD=483.3 PAD=483.6 PAD=483.8 PAD=482.9 PAD=483.7 PAD=483.5PAD=483.2PAD=482.9 PAD=481.3 PAD=481.5 PAD=481.8 PAD=482.1 PAD=482.6 PAD=483.0 PAD=483.4PAD=483.2PAD=482.4PAD=482.1PAD=481.8PAD=481.5PAD=481.31 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25262728293031 LOT A 0.18 AC.LOT B0.76AC.LOT C 0.26 AC. LOT D 0.52 AC. LOT D 0.39 AC. RETENTION BASIN 25.5342.4750.009.9781.98 54.0054.00100.00 54.0054.00100.00 54.0054.00100.00 54.0054.00100.00 54.0054.00100.00 54.0054.00100.00 54.0054.00100.00 54.0054.00100.00 41.83 R=50' L=12'53.99100.00 R=50'L=37'54.00101.50 3 3 . 1 3 R=50' L=25'54.00100.00 9 2 . 2 9 R=50' L=47' 5.00 2 9 1 . 4 6135.7285.89 25.532 5 . 3 8 5.31 1 5 2 . 7 6R=50'L=100'34.312 5 . 4 6 18.94 R =5 0 ' L =1 0 1 ' 118.13 2 0 9 . 4 9R=50'L=78'3 6 . 9 3 98.57R =5 0 'L =3 1 '54.00108.28R =5 0 ' L =1 0 ' 43.86 54.00 2 5 . 4 6 18.94 R=20' L=26' R =50' L = 2 21' 86.02 25.4686.0025.532 5 . 3 8 107.2442.16 25.4689.2460.16 102.9284.922 5 . 4 6 41.00 102.9250.00 50.00 102.9250.00 50.00 40.54 R=50' L=5'118.59116.92R =5 0 ' L =1 0 2 ' 5.00 1 4 1 . 1 6 44.72 10.002 4 4 . 5 2R=50'L=83'108.63 10.002 4 4 . 5 2R=50'L=83'108.63 13.03618.88 13.03116.82R =5 0 'L =3 1 '20.54 50.00106.9450.00 50.00106.6550.00 50.00106.3650.00 50.00106.0750.00 50.00105.7850.00 50.00 2 5 . 4 6 25.4686.0025.53516.30R = 5 0' L= 2 2 1 ' R=20' L=26'449.722 5 . 3 8 2 5 . 4 6 25.462 5 . 4 6 245.62 R=20' L=26' R =50' L = 2 21' 312.70 25.4686.00105.4942.16 25.4669.252 5 . 3 8 42.26 N0° 41' 14"E 23.00 N0° 13' 38"E 779.74N4 0 ° 5 0 ' 1 8 "W 1 0 3 9 . 3 9 N89° 26' 29"W 63.95 N0° 33' 30"E 23.03 N89° 26' 30"W 618.91 2 5 . 4 6 2 5 . 4 6 25.462 5 . 4 6 25.462 5 . 4 6 25.4686.0025.4656.90 32.87 47.69 50' 25'25'25'25'50'25'25'50'25' 18'18' 7'7'18'18'7'7'25'18'7'C/L VERONA ROADC/LC/L C/L TP 478.81TP 479.52 TP 478.81 0.52%0.81% TP 479.70TP 479.260.52%TP 479.26HP1.50%LP0.52% TP 482.00TP 480.210.52%TP 481.24 0.52% 3' RETAINING WALL 6' RETAINING WALL TP 480.96 PROP. 18" SD PIPE CB CB 10'VERONA ST. ENERGY DISAPPATOR 25240 K.A.C. APPROVED DATE REVISIONNO. PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECT SUPERVISION OF:DESIGN BY: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: APPROVED BY: DATER.C.E. NO. CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA FILE NO. DWG. NO. Of SHEETS SHEET 62624 KEITH A. CHRISTIANSEN DATE R.C.E. 50083 DATER.C.E. NO. REVIEWED BY: JOEL MONTALVO CORRECTED APPROVED "AS BUILT"NO.BY BY DATEDATE 1 1 JOHN M. BRUDIN 41836 BENCH MARK ELEV. (750) 22790 0 22000 FILL (CY)CUT (CY) IMPORT SHRINKAGE (10%) OVEREXCAVATION (2.0') EARTHWORK ESTIMATE SUBSIDENCE (0.10') ITEM 2450 22000 7500 CY 3200 10400 LOCATION APN 677-020-032 CASA VERONA TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 38042RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92507 PH: 951-323-4713 FAX: 951-405-8410 5225 CANYON CREST DRIVE, STE. 251 EMAIL: keith@CCOCIVIL.com A SUBDIVISION OF A PORTION OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 6, T.4S.,R.5E., S.B.B. & M. K.A.C. K.A.C. TYPICAL SECTION FOR INTERIOR STREETS IN THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA CHRISTIANSEN & COMPANY OCTOBER 2020 GOVERNMENT LOT 6 AND A PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 8 IN THE N.W 1/4 OF SECTION 6, T.4S., R.5E. S.B.M. TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 38042 TYPICAL SECTION FOR VERONA ROAD DATE PREPARED: 10/23/20 OWNER/APPLICANT: CASA VERONA, LLC 699 INDIAN TRAIL PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA 92264 PH: 760-774-3294 FAX: 858-857-1840 CONTACT: MARK TEMPLE EMAIL: MARK@TEMPLECONSTRUCTIONINC.COM ENGINEER: CHRISTIANSEN & COMPANY 5225 CANYON CREST DRIVE, STE. 251 RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92507 FAX: 951-405-8410 CONTACT: KEITH CHRISTIANSEN EMAIL: KEITH@CCOCIVIL.COM PH: 951-323-4713 MAP SCALE: ADDRESS: XX-XXX VERONA ROAD - PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA 92264 ACREAGE: GROSS:6.44 ZONING: EXISTING: R-1-D PROPOSED: R-1-E SURROUNDING: RGA8, R-1-D, R-1-C, W LAND USE/GP: EXISTING: VACANT PROPOSED: SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SURROUNDING: RESIDENTIAL, FLOOD CONTROL UTILITY PURVEYORS: WATER: DESERT WATER AGENCY SEWER: CITY OF PALM SPRINGS GAS: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO. ELECTRIC: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON PHONE: FONTIER COMMUNICATIONS CABLE: TIME WARNER CABLE WQMP NOTE: AN EARTHEN RETENTION BASIN IS UTILIZED FOR 100% STORMWATER CONTAINMENT OF THE 100YR-24HR STORM EVENT. THEREFORE, WQMP WORKSHEET VOLUMES ARE ACHIEVED. (760)-323-4971 (760)-323-8299 (760)-341-4523 (760)-202-4290 (855)-284-2105 (760)-340-1312 LOT ACREAGE A B C D E 1-31 0.18 0.76 0.26 0.52 0.39 4.33 WASTE: BURRTEC WASTE & RECYCLING SERVICES (760)-292-2495 INTERIOR STREET LOT DEDICATION VERONA ROAD INTERIOR STREET LOT INTERIOR STREET LOT RETENTION BASIN RESIDENTIAL LOTS 1"=50' NOTE: PROPERTY NOT IN A COUNTY SERVICE AREA OR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT. ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBERS: 677-020-032 FEMA FLOOD ZONE FLOOD ZONE:X PANEL:06065C1557G EFFECTIVE DATE:8/28/2008 ELEVATION DATUM: +500 FEET HAS BEEN ADDED TO ALL ELEVATION TO ELIMINATE NEGATIVE (-) ELEVATIONS. ELEVATION DATUM: +500 FEET HAS BEEN ADDED TO ALL ELEVATION TO ELIMINATE NEGATIVE (-) ELEVATIONS. VICINITY MAP Christiansen & Company Land Development - Design - Engineering Est. 2007 WH I T EW A T E R C H A N N E L 6 7 7 - 0 2 0 - 0 2 7 501-190-011 501- 190- 002 677-030-034501- 421 001 PROPOSED CONTOUR EXISTING CONTOUR PROPOSED ELEVATION EXISTING ELEVATION EXISTING TREE/BUSH CROSS - GUTTER PROPOSED CURB & GUTTER EXISTING CURB & GUTTER EDGE OF PAVEMENT POWER POLE EXISTING P.C. CONCRETE DIRECTION OF FLOW TC TP FL FLOWLINE TOP OF PAVEMENT TOP OF CURB GB GRADE BREAK HP HIGH POINT FS FINISHED SURFACE FG FINISHED GRADE NG EXISTING GRADE STA. STATIONING INV. INVERT EP EDGE OF PAVEMENT PROPOSED AC PAVEMENT EXISTING WATER SERVICE EXISTING SEWER LAERAL PROPOSED RIP RAP