HomeMy WebLinkAbout2010-01-25- ARC MinutesCITY OF PALM SPRINGS
ARCHITECTURAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE
MINUTES OF JANUARY 25, 2010
Council Chamber, City Hall
3200 East Tahquitz Canyon Way, Palm Springs, CA 92262
CALL TO ORDER: Chair Ortega called the meeting to order at 3:00 p.m.
ATTENDANCE - YTD Present: # Absent: # Total
Paul Ortega, Chair
X
2
0 2
William Kleindienst, Vice Chair
X
1
1 2
Chris Sahlin
1
X 1 2
Lance O'Donnell
X
2
0 2
Michael King
X
2
0 2
Robert Parker
X
2
2
Patrick McGrew
X
2
2
Donald Wexler
X
Ana Maria Escalante
X
(Roll Call record is from January 2010 thru meeting of January 25, 2010)
Planning Commission Members Present: Commissioner Hudson
APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Meeting minutes of January 11, 2010 were not completed. No vote
taken.
REVISIONS TO AGENDA: None.
PUBLIC COMMENTS: There were no public comments.
AGENDA ITEM #2: Case 3.3408 MAA — Rick's Restaurant
Rick Seidner, owner of Rick's Restaurant, for a re -paint of building at 1973 North Palm Canyon Drive,
Zone C-1, Section 3. (GM)
Assistant Planner Mlaker presented this plan to the AAC and stated that the applicant is seeking
approval to paint the restaurant building 4 colors. The main body to be green, window trim cream, the
roof beige. and dark red -for the front -wall: ---
Rick Seidner owner described the project and stated that he wishes to eliminate the red color for the
front wall and paint it cream, the same color as the window trim.
Member O'Donnell commented that the proposed colors are acceptable, however the sheen or finish
of the paint may pose a problem. Use paint with a flat finish.
ACTION: M/S/C (McGrew / Kleindienst, 5-1, opposed/Parker, 1 absent/Sahlin) To recommend
approval of the re -paint with three colors in a flat finish.
Architectural Advisory Committee Meeting
Minutes of January 25, 2010
AGENDA ITEM #3: Case 3.1870 MAA — Albertson's Supermarket
Albertson's supermarket for re -paint of all sides on existing building and exterior material clean-up
including new roof cornice at 1751 North Sunrise Way, Zone CDN, Section 2. (GM)
Assistant Planner Mlaker described the proposal to re -paint the building three separate shades of
brown. In addition the applicant would like to place a cornice at the very flop of the building.
Mark Martinez architect stated that Albertson's wanted to use earth tone colors to enliven the
shopping center. He also mentioned that Albertson's has been in touch with the shopping center
ownership and they are aware of the re -paint. The property owners have agreed to paint the
remaining buildings in the center a similar color in the future..
Member O'Donnell supports painting the entire center but does not support the placement of a
cornice at the top of the building.
Member King does not support the cornice.
ACTION: M/S/C (O'Donnell / Kleindienst 6-0, 1 absent/Sahlin) To recommend approval of re-
paint without the placement of the top cornice.
AGENDA ITEM #4: Case 3.3409 SFR —1496 Avenida Sevilla
David M. Kotchick to construct a single-family residence of approximately 4,057 square feet, a garage
of approximately 1,212 square feet and a second unit of approximately 800 square feet on a vacant
lot located at 1495 Avenida Sevilla, Zone R-1-B, Section 35. (DN)
Edward O. Robertson, Principal Planner, described the proposed residence as outlined in the staff
report. Wendell Veith, the project Architect, gave a brief presentation on the project.
Committee member Parker requested that the applicant reduce the driveway entrance and provide
trees in the front yard area. He also noted that the Bronze Flax plant may not survive the harsh
desert climate.
Member King said the driveway should be enhanced with pavers.
Committee member McGrew stated that he was not in support of the project as proposed.
Motion failed.
Motion: McGrew — to re -study building for better quality architecture. No second was received.
Motion failed.
Motion: O'Donnell — to recommend approval of architecture and re -study the landscape plan.
Seconded by Parker. (2-4, opposed/King, Kleindienst, McGrew, Ortega; 1 absent/Sahlin) Motion
failed.
2
Architectural Advisory Committee Meeting
Minutes of January 25, 2010
ACTION: M/S/C (King / Parker 4-2, opposed/ Kleindienst, McGrew; 1 absent/Sahlin) To re -study
the proposal with a recommendation that the applicant re -design the front driveway,
provide trees in front yard area and show additional details of the architecture
(including window detailing).
AGENDA ITEM #5: Case 3.3377 City Project — Tahquitz Canyon Way Median
Member Parker recused himself from the proceeding due to a conflict of interest.
Marcus Fuller, Assistant Director of Public Works, introduced Rob Parker of the design team who
presented a video simulation of the proposed project as it relates to the section in front of City Hall.
Mr. Parker reminded the AAC that they reviewed this project in early January and he stated that
minor changes have been made to the plan to include higher canopy trees along El Cielo to provide
better views of City Hall. Mr. Parker also stated that the paving pattern in front of City Hall would be
consistent through out the project.
Member O'Donnell stated that he does not support car parking along the drive aisle in front of City
Hail. Use original design.
Member McGrew stated that the City Hall Class 1 historic designation should be considered to
encompass the entire City Hall site and not just the building. The proposed plan will alter and affect
the integrity of the Class 1 designation and recommends that this project be reviewed by HSPB. Mr.
McGrew requests a re -study.
Member King stated that he reiterates the comments made by other AAC members and does not
support parking along the front drive aisle. He also mentioned that the demonstration garden in its
proposed form will look like a berm and will block the view shed of City Hall. Too much design — less
is more.
Member Kleindienst asked several questions concerning the future of the turf area directly in front of
the main City Hall building. He stated that he believes the plan presented is well thought out and he
supports the plan.
Chair Ortega stated that using annuals and turf is not sustainable.
Planning Director Ewing gave a brief description of the review process as it moves forward.
Motion: Kleindienst — to approve plans as submitted. No second was received. Motion dies.
ACTION: M/S/C (King / McGrew 4-1, opposed/Kleindienst, 1 abstain/Parker, 1 absent/King) To
recommend re -study with comments from this meeting and the meeting from January
11, 2010. to be incorporated into the plans.
CHAIRMAN 1 COMMITTEE / STAFF COMMENTS:
Member O'Donnell asked for a future review of the Bogart Trail specific plan area.
3
Architectural Advisory Committee Meeting
Mlinutes of January 25, 2010,
Member Kleindienst stated that he missed the past two AAC meetings due to unexpected illness.
Planning Director Ewing reminded the AAC of the conflict of interest rules and how they have recently
changed. AAC and Planning Commission members must leave the chamber if they have a conflict of
interest relating to the plan being presented.
Member O'Donnell asked if a member of their staff could be in the audience to take notes or present
the plans. The answer is that it is preferred if the AAC member does not make the presentation.
This rule would not apply if the AAC member was a sole owner.
ADJOURNMENT:
There being no further comments, the AAC meeting adjourned at 4:14 p.m.
. 0' obertson
rd