HomeMy WebLinkAbout2012-12-10- ARC MinutesCITY OF PALM SPRINGS
ARCHITECTURAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE
Council Chamber, City Hall
3200 East Tahquitz Canyon Way, Palm Springs, CA 92262
MINUTES OF DECEMBER 10, 2012
CALL TO ORDER: Chair Kleindienst called the meeting to order at 3:00 p.m.
ATTENDANCE - YTD
Present:
#
Absent: #
Total
William Kleindienst, Chair
X
17
6
24
James Harlan, Vice Chair
X
23
1
24
William Fauber
X
23
1
24
Gary Fredricks
X
19
6
24
Susan Secoy-Jensen
X
21
3
24
Randy Purnel
X
22
2
24
Paul Ortega
X
16
8
24
Dan Thompson
X
16
N/A
(Attendance record begins on January 2012 through the meeting of December 10, 2012.)
Planning Commission Members Present: None
REVISIONS TO AGENDA:
PUBLIC COMMENTS: Three (3) minute time limit per person on matters within the
jurisdiction of the Architectural Advisory Committee.
There were no public comments.
AGENDA ITEM #2: Case 3.2312 MAA — Restudy — Allan Ladd Building
Prest-Vuksic, architects for a restudy of proposed landscape plan, entry canopy design, and
exterior lighting for the Allen Ladd Building located at 500 South Palm Canyon Drive, Zone C-
1, Section 22. (GM)
Assistant Planner Mlaker stated that the AAC had previously reviewed this project at the
November 12, 2012 meeting and recommended a restudy of the landscape plan, entry
canopy design, and exterior lighting. The AAC recommended approval of the proposed paint
color scheme.
John Vuksic, architect representing the property owner described the proposed changes to
the submittal to include a revised landscape plan, new entry canopy, and exterior lighting.
Two options for exterior lighting was shown to the AAC. The applicant would like approval of
both options.
Architectural Advisory Committee Meeting
Minutes of December 10, 2012
Member Fauber asked for clarification on the kind of lighting source. The architect
responded by describing the lighting as LED resulting in a warm glow that would wash the
sides of the building.
Member Purnel reviewed the landscape plan and agrees with the submittal.
Member Fredricks thanked the applicant for providing specific quantities, sizes and plant
types.
Member Ortega stated that the landscape plan shows a good mix of plant types, and heights.
Member Secoy-Jensen questioned the detail on the entry canopy and a question on the
proposed light fixture.
Mr. Vuksic described the two light fixture options. Option one was presented and would be 8
fixtures horizontal above the entry doors. Option two would be a 6' foot tall vertical fixture
two on each side.
Vice Chair Harlan suggested that the wood panels above the entry door be lighted
ACTION: M/S/C (Kleindienst / Fauber, 7-0) To recommend to the Planning Director
approval of the landscape plan; front entry canopy design to include up lighting of wood
panels; and the option to use either light fixture.
AGENDA ITEM #3: Case 3.1304 MAA - Restudy — 140 Via Lola Building
Howard Hawkes seeking review of a proposed redesign of a second -story balcony railing
facing Palm Canyon Drive of a property located at 140 via Lola, Zone R-2/ C-1, Section 10.
(GM)
Assistant Planner Mlaker stated that this case was previously reviewed by the AAC on
December 10, 2012 for a building repaint, new awning, and other building repairs. The
applicant is now seeking approval to replace an existing balcony railing on the building front
fagade with an LED lighted etched glass railing.
Howard Hawkes designer and Steven from Architectural Glazing representing the property
owner described the proposed railing. The railing frame will be chrome and 42" tall frosted
glass with an LED light strip on the top and bottom "shoe". The color of the light can be
changed and brightness can be regulated. The railing will be placed at the edge of the
balcony in line with the lower fagade wall.
Member Fauber asked if the balcony structure is sound for the attachment of the new railing
Member Fredricks asked for an explanation of the range of colors.
Chair Kleindienst asked how frequent the colors can change and time frames.
2
Architectural Advisory Committee Meeting
Minutes of December 10, 2012
The applicant responded that the color controls will be set and will not change randomly.
Member Secoy-Jensen is concerned with the comprehensive design of the railing and asked
if the residents would be disturbed by the illumination.
AAC members offered the following comments and recommendations:
3.a AAC supports the concept of the lighted railing.
3.b Greater detail is needed concerning roof drainage, electrical connections, structural
designs.
3.c Include a comprehensive overview of the railing on the site.
ACTION: M/S/C (Kleindienst / Harlan, 7-0) For re -study of proposed lighted railing.
Applicant to place test model at site in proposed location for AAC members to view.
AGENDA ITEM #4: Case 3.3527 MAA — Commercial Building Repaint
Anthony Cioffi requesting a building repaint of a front fagade to one main color and new
design of sidewalk cafe railing located at 340 North Palm Canyon drive, Zone CBD, Section
15. (GM)
Assistant Planner Mlaker stated that the project includes the repaint of the front fagade of an
existing restaurant building. The proposed color is "Salem Black" for the main body and
"Smokey Mountain" for doors and trim. The new patio railing will be constructed of Trex
material
Anthony Cioffi, the project designer, described the color choices and the patio railing
material.
Member Fredricks asked for an explanation of the color choice. He stated that the patio
railing should be a different color so as to not blend with the main color,
Member Purnel asked if the new paint color will wrap around the sides of the building.
Member Fauber asked if the blade sign will remain and stated that the photo simulation does
not correctly represent the request. The location and material of the patio railing is not clear.
Vice Chair Harlan stated that he was comfortable with the color but not with the proposed
patio railing material.
Chair Kleindienst stated that the exposed ends of the Trax railing is unfinished; he asked for
detail of the inside railing facing the patio interior; the new paint will need to wrap around the
sides of the building; concerned with the dark color fading over time; clarification on the
awnings and lighting of the exterior.
AAC members offered the following comments and recommendations:
3.a Return color around the sides of the building to a logical break.
3
Architectural Advisory Committee Meeting
Minutes of December 10, 2012
3.b Sides of awning to be closed.
3.c Include detail of exterior lighting.
3.d Section of wall detail.
3.e Restudy design of patio railing.
ACTION: M/S/C (Fauber / Kleindienst, 7-0) To recommend restudy.
CHAIRMAN / COMMITTEE / STAFF COMMENTS:
Principal Planner Robertson reminded the AAC that today is the last meeting of the year.
The next AAC meeting will be Monday, January 7, 2013.
Edward Robertson stated that five member's terms have expired. If a current member is
eligible and willing to be re -appointed, a formal application must be received. Members are
encouraged to go on-line and complete the application process.
ADJOURNMENT:
There being no further comments, the AAC meeting adjourned at 4:35 p.m.
6�"
ward O. Robertson
Principal Planner
EI