Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2013-01-07- ARC MinutesCITY OF PALM SPRINGS ARCHITECTURAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE Council Chamber, City Hall 3200 East Tahquitz Canyon Way, Palm Springs, CA 92262 MINUTES OF JANUARY 7, 2013 CALL TO ORDER: Vice Chair Harlan called the meeting to order at 3:00 p.m. A 1 1 CIV UAIYIsC - r 1 U Present: s William Kleindienst, Chair 0 James Harlan, Vice Chair X 1 William Fauber X 1 Gary Fredricks X 1 Susan Secoy-Jensen X 1 Randy Purnel X 1 Dan Thompson X 1 Donald Wexler X 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 N/A (Attendance record begins on January 2013 through the meeting of January 7, 2013.) Planning Commission Members Present: Munger APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Approval of Minutes for meeting of November 13, 2012 with corrections to Agenda Item #8. ACTION: M/S/C (Secoy-Jensen / Fauber, 6-0) To approve the minutes of November 13, 2012 with corrections to Agenda Item #8. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Approval of Minutes for meeting of November 19, 2012 with corrections to Agenda Item #2. ACTION: M/S/C (Secoy-Jensen / Fredricks, 6-0) To approve the minutes of November 19, 2012 with corrections to Agenda Item #8. REVISIONS TO AGENDA: PUBLIC COMMENTS: Three (3) minute time limit per person on matters within the jurisdiction of the Architectural Advisory Committee. There were no public comments. AGENDA ITEM #2: Case 3.3527 MAA Restudy — BAR Restaurant Anthony Cioffi requesting a building repaint of a front facade to one main color and new design of sidewalk cafe railing located at 340 North Palm Canyon Drive, Zone CBD, Section 15. (GM) Architectural Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes of January 7, 2013 Assistant Planner Mlaker stated that this project was previously reviewed by the AAC on December 10, 2012 and was restudied with the following comments: 1. Return color around the sides of the building to a logical break. 2. Sides of awning to be closed. 3. Include detail of exterior lighting. 4. Section of wall detail 5. Restudy design of patio railing. At the previous meeting the color scheme was discussed and no objection was raised. Detailed drawings of the railing have been provided. Anthony Cioffi, designer was present and answered questions. Member Fauber asked for an explanation of patio railing fasteners. He supports the exterior paint scheme, however he is concerned with the color fading over time. Vice Chair Harlan staffed that he did visit the restaurant and better understands the coordination of the exterior and interior paint schemes. Secoy-Jensen asked for. clarification on the building exterior lighting. She supports the proposed exterior paint scheme. ACTION: M/S/C (Harlan / Fauber, 6-0) To recommend approval of paint scheme, new awnings, and patio railing material. AGENDA ITEM #3: Case 3.1404 MAA Restudy —140 Via Lola Building Howard Hawks seeking review of a proposed redesign of a second -story balcony railing facing North Palm Canyon Drive, Zone CBD, Section 15. (GM) Assistant Planner Mlaker stated that this project was previously reviewed by the AAC on December 10, 2012 and was restudied with the following comments: 1. AAC supports the concept of the lighted railing. 2. Greater detail is needed concerning roof drainage, electrical connections, and structural designs. 3. Include a comprehensive overview of the railing on the site. The applicant has provided additional information to include detailed diagrams of the proposed railing with electrical and roof connections, and proposed railings along Via Lola at the swimming pools. Howard Hawks, designer was present and described the project in greater detail. Member Thompson asked if the glass gates will be illuminated, and if it is easy to replace a panel if broken. P) Architectural Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes of January 7, 2013 Member Secoy-Jensen asked if the existing rock affixed to the wall will remain. She supports the lighted railing system. Member Purnel asked if landscaping is part of this review. He stated that he supports the lighted railing; however, he is concerned that it may be overbearing. Planner Mlaker responded that landscaping as presented is for informational purposes and not before the AAC today. Vice Chair Harlan asked if the lighted railing exhibit placed on the balcony roof for AAC review was set at a high intensity. Mr. Hawks stated that the intensity of the light was at 70%. Member Fredricks prefers the white illumination color and would like to condition the approval. ACTION: M/S/C (Fauber / Fredricks, 6-0) To recommend approval as submitted with the stipulation that the color be set at white. AGENDA ITEM #4: Case 3.1314 MAA — Village Racquet Club HOA Village Racquet Club HOA requesting to repaint 20 buildings and Club House: the complex is located at 900 E. Ramon Road, Zone HR, Section 14. (GM) Assistant Planner Mlaker stated that the HOA is requesting the repaint of 20 buildings and Club House to a two color paint scheme with single -level units painted "Sand Dune" and two - level units painted "Wood Acre". The exterior of the Club House will be painted the darker color and the pedestrian areas the lighter beige. Mr. Mlaker mentioned that email correspondence from concerned residents have been attached to the Staff memo. The Village Racquet Club HOA Board was represented by Tom Potter from Fogg Coat Painting, Contractor; Jeffery Grons — HOA Board Paint Committee Spokesman; Mark Graham — HOA Board President; Pete Whitman — Vice President of HOA Board. Jeff Grons - Paint Committee Spokesman provided detailed background information on the paint selection process. A color specialist from Dunn Edwards was hired to conduct paint studies. Several paint schemes were available for residents viewing over a period of months and an HOA Board vote was taken resulting in the two tone color scheme as presented. He stated that the repaint will help freshen the complex and increase property values. Member Fauber asked if the perimeter wall will be painted. Mr. Grons stated that the walls will not be painted. Member Secoy-Jensen asked if the Navajo White was considered 3 Architectural Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes of January 7, 2013 Member Fredricks asked if pure white was ever considered. Jerry Ogburn, resident presented two artist renderings of the original complex design showing the current color scheme. He stated that the proposed brown will look dark at dusk and will make the complex looked closed in. The Club House will be too dark and he recommends Navajo White as one color. Larry Gable, resident does not support the proposed color scheme. Mark Graham — HOA President stated that a motion was made to paint the complex white. Dan Waddell, resident does not support the proposed color scheme and noted that a dark color will show flaws. Carlos Camacho, resident supports the proposed color scheme. Paul Gibbs, resident supports the proposed color scheme and stated that the HOA Board was elected to make these decisions. Al Lindstrom, resident supports the HOA Board decision and stated that a paint selection committee was appointed to study the project. Harriett Kane, resident does not support the proposed color scheme. Robert Johnston, resident does not support the proposed color scheme but does support the repaint to Navajo White and stated that the individual unit and garage doors are painted a dark brown. Pete Whitman, Vice President of HOA Board stated that members where given notice of the proposed paint schemes and the two colors presented are a compromise of both interests. Val Ogburn, resident stated that the Mediterranean architecture requires a white color, the proposed color scheme will diminish the intent of the design. Lynn Bourget, resident support the proposed paint scheme and stated that the color samples have been available for viewing at the Club House for many months and she supports the HOA Board. Paul Schwart, resident supports the proposed color scheme and believes that the HOA Board should be followed. Jack Turner, resident would like the color to stay the same and noted that the painted doors provide contrast. Member Fredrick appreciates the work conducted by the HOA Board and noted that snow white may be more appropriate. He does not support the Club House repaint. El Architectural Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes of January 7, 2013 Member Thompson stated that painting the end units the darker color is not good design. Secoy-Jensen stated that the existing white painted complex looks good as contrast to the desert mountainside. Member Purnel stated that the exhibits are not complete and do not accurately show the proposed paint scheme. He can support one color. Member Fauber stated that he likes the contrasting exterior door color but does not support painting the Club House according to the scheme. Member Secoy-Jensen can support one color. ACTION: M/S/C (Harlan / Secoy-Jensen, 4-2, opposed Fauber, Thompson) To recommend a monochromatic color scheme. AGENDA ITEM #5: Case 5.1284 PDD 360 — Arrive Hotel — Final PD Palm Grove Group, LLC for approval of final Planned Development for the Arrive Hotel, a 32- room hotel with accessory restaurant and retail uses on a roughly 1.27-acre parcel at 1551 North Palm Canyon Drive. (KL) Principal Planner Robertson directed the AAC to the Staff memo listing advisory and mandatory conditions imposed by the City Council. The plans presented today are for the final planned development district and comments will be forward to the Planning Commission. Chris Pardoe project architect was present to answer questions. Vice Chair Harlan asked if the parking lot configuration has changed; location of restaurant grease trap; what portions of the modular building are tiled; palm tree spacing around the parking lot is crowded. Member Fredricks asked for clarification on the proposed roof top garden including irrigation plans. Member Secoy-Jensen asked for an explanation of the screening method of the roof top equipment. Member Fauber commented on the balcony railing materials. ACTION: M/S/C (Fredricks / Secoy-Jensen, 6-0) To recommend approval to the Planning Commission as presented. Note: Staff to explore a change in the Zoning Ordinance methodology as it relates to the 70% shading requirement of parking lots with the intent of providing an appropriate root area for plants to thrive. 161 Architectural Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes of January 7, 2013 AGENDA ITEM #6: Case 6.1291 CUP — Craig Wireless Craig Wireless for the installation of a rooftop commercial communication antenna system on the existing mini -storage building located at 401 West Radio Road, Zone M-1, Section 34. (DN) Associate Planner Newell described the proposed commercial communication antennae installation to the AAC as outlined in the staff memorandum. He noted an existing monopole containing wireless communication antennae exists on the property. The proposed installation rooftop facility will include an equipment cabinet that extends above the existing parapet. Member Purnel asked staff to clarify how these types of installations are normally processed. Richard Brunelle of Craig Wireless was available for questions. He noted that the color of the antennae and structure is usually painted a sky blue so that the facility is less obvious in appearance. Vice Chair Harlan asked if any other members of the public would like to speak on this item. Seeing no one wishing to speak, Vice Chair closed the public comment. ACTION: M/S/C (Jensen / Fauber 6-0) To recommend approval as presented. AGENDA ITEM #7: Case 5.1292 CUP — Craig Wireless Craig Wireless for the installation of a rooftop commercial communications antenna system on the existing office building located at 1330 North Indian Canyon Drive, Zone R-3, Section 11. (DN) Associate Planner Newell presented the project to the AAC. He stated the facility would be installed an equipment well on the roof. He directed the AAC to a photograph on the board showing the existing equipment well. Richard Brunelle of Craig Wireless was available for questions. Vice Chair Harlan asked if any other members of the public would like to speak on this item. Seeing no one wishing to speak, Vice Chair closed the public comment. ACTION: M/S/C (Fauber / Fredericks 6-0) To recommend approval as submitted. AGENDA ITEM #8: Case SP 06-084 — Sunrise Place Shopping Center Lundin Development to install two approved monument signs in reversed direction at the Ralphs CVS / Pharmacy shopping center located at 425 South Sunrise Way, Zone NC (Section 14 Master Plan), Section 14. (DN) Associate Planner Newell stated the proposed monument signs were previously approved by the City Council under an appeal, but the applicant is now requesting approval to install both signs in a reversed direction. 0 Architectural Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes of January 7, 2013 Mr. David George of Lundin Development provided additional information on the reasoning for changing the direction of the signs. He asked for AAC support and was available to answer questions. Vice Chair Harlan asked if any other members of the public would like to speak on this item. Seeing no one wishing to speak, Vice Chair closed the public comment. ACTION: M/S/C (Fredericks / Thompson 6-0) To recommend approval as presented. CHAIRMAN / COMMITTEE / STAFF COMMENTS: No comments. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further comments, the AAC meeting adjourned at 5:45 p.m. rig E 1, AICP Director ofTjoning Services n 7