Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2021-03-01- ARC MinutesCity of Palm Springs ARCHITECTURAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE 3200 East Tahquitz Canyon Way, Palm Springs, California 92262 (Meeting held via Zoom) Minutes of March 1, 2021 CALL TO ORDER: Vice Chair Rotman called the meeting to order at 5:30 pm. ROLL CALL: Committee Members Present: Doczi, Lockyer, Poehlein, Walsh, Vice Chair Rotman Committee Members Absent: McCoy, Chair Jakway Planning Commissioner Present: None Staff Present: Assistant Director of Planning Newell, Engineering Associate Minjares, Associate Planner Lyon, Associate Planner Mlaker REPORT OF THE POSTING OF AGENDA: The Agenda was available for public access at the City Hall bulletin board (west side of Council Chamber) by February 25, 2021, and posted on the City's website as required by established policies and procedures. ACCEPTANCE OF THE AGENDA: Vice Chair Rotman requested clarification on the location and lighting for the proposed monument signs. Poehlein, seconded by Doczi to accept agenda presented. AYES: DOCZI, LOCKYER, POEHLEIN, THOMPSON, WALSH, ROTMAN ABSENT: MCCOY, JAKWAY PUBLIC COMMENTS: None. CONSENT CALENDAR: 1. A SIGN PROGRAM APPLICATION BY RIVERSIDE UNIVERSITY HEALTH Architectural Advisory Committee Minutes March 1, 2021 City of Palm Springs CARE FOR A MULTI -TENANT CENTER LOCATED AT 191 NORTH SUNRISE WAY, ZONE RA (CASE SP20-004). (KL) Approved, as presented. Walsh, seconded by Lockyer to approve as part of Consent Calendar. AYES: DOCZI, LOCKYER, POEHLEIN, THOMPSON, WALSH, ROTMAN ABSENT: MCCOY, JAKWAY UNFINISHED BUSINESS: 2. CBM TWO HOTELS, LP, FOR A MINOR ARCHITECTURAL APPLICATION PROPOSING FACADE MODERNIZATION AND ADDITION OF AN 864 SQUARE FOOT FITNESS CENTER AT THE COURTYARD BY MARRIOT HOTEL LOCATED 1300 EAST TAHQUITZ CANYON WAY, ZONE: RESORT ATTRACTION (RA) (CASE 3.0779 MAA) (KL). Planner Lyon presented the proposed project as outlined in the staff memorandum. MICHAEL HARPER, applicant, described the project and said they are open to modifications to the landscape plan. He said that the proposed lighting under the porte- cochere is brighter due to the area being higher pedestrian activity. Member Doczi asked about the use of wood and potential concern with the long-term maintenance. (Mr. Harper responded that they are not concerned and their goal is match the wood elements on the front and side entrances.) Member Walsh questioned the proposed location of the rooftop mechanical and whether or not it could be placed on the ground. (Mr. Harper said the reason was due to the unit being located closer to the vent and if on the ground it would require additional screening. He thought they could study making the equipment well deeper. However, the ideal situation is to allow a steeper slope, allowing the elimination of the parapet.) Vice Chair Rotman clarified details of the storefront windows related to the entry door height. He confirmed that the dark grey and cedar colors were part of the proposed rebranding. He thinks that the fitness center building overhangs may not be necessary for the east and west sides of the building, due to the size of the existing adjacent buildings, and said the overhang proportions seemed odd and top heavy. He's concerned with the overall design of the entry fagade. Member Walsh thinks the design is inappropriate from an aesthetic standpoint. 2 Architectural Advisory Committee Minutes March 1, 2021 City of Palm Springs Member Lockyer discussed the user experience with the proposed changes, stating the lack of landscape around the proposed fitness center. (Planner Lyon provided an overview on the proposed landscape changes.) Mr. Lockyer suggested adding landscape to the fitness area to improve the user experience of the landscape/hardscape spaces. Member Lockyer asked about the proposed lighting temperature under the canopy. (Planner Lyon responded that the applicant has agreed to lower the temperature to 3000K.) Member Doczi recommended moving the fitness center building closer to the parking lot to allow for additional landscape in the interior space. He also expressed concern with the proposed design integration with the building. Vice Chair Rotman said the rebranding of the building needs to relate better to the existing architecture. The lighting temperature needs to be consistent with existing (building and landscape). The fitness center building overhang needs to be evaluated based on a shade study. The proposed colors are incompatible with the current Spanish architecture. Rotman, seconded by Thompson to table for further study based on Committee comments. AYES: DOCZI, LOCKYER, POEHLEIN, THOMPSON, WALSH, ROTMAN ABSENT: MCCOY, JAKWAY NEW BUSINESS: 3. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT LLC (DBA: CO-DVLP DISPENSARY) REQUESTING A MINOR ARCHITECTURAL APPLICATION FOR THE RENOVATION OF AN EXISTING 2,637-SQUARE FOOT VACANT BUILDING INCLUDING NEW LANDSCAPING AND PARKING LOT UPGRADE AND EXTERIOR SIGN REVIEW FOR A NEW CANNABIS DISPENSARY AT 315 NORTH INDIAN CANYON DRIVE, ZONE CBD (CASE 3.289 MAA) (GM). Associate Planner Mlaker presented the proposed site and exterior renovations for the 2,637-square foot cannabis dispensary. GARY MILLER, project architect, provided details about the building exterior, landscape and lighting. He discussed heat gain from the large glass windows, mechanical screen on roof and the need for a solid wall on the south elevation. NICK WOLIN, owner, discussed the location of the front slider door placed further back from the street for security. He discussed the driveway widths, textured walls, and 3 Architectural Advisory Committee Minutes March 1, 2021 City of Palm Springs landscaping. He said the building design needs to be sensitive to the odor control methods used within the building in relation with front door width and location. Member Doczi would like to see a better site plan that defines the walkways versus loading area/walking area. He supports the design of south building wall; however, he's concerned with the dirty area in the back and suggested adding landscaping. Member Poehlein asked about the up -lighting on the south elevation wall. He would like to see a planter bed in front of the store -front window. He said he can support the south wall design. Member Lockyer asked about the location of the front property line and the right-of-way. He would like to see a planter bed below front windows. He also suggested adding planter beds on the north wall and places where hard surfaces meet the ground to soften the building. Vice Chair Rotman noted that the front entry door is 7'-6" tall and needs more of a presence. He suggested using a simple screen around the mechanical equipment and adding a transom over the front door. He likes the sign and south building elevation; and suggested simplifying the roof screen and adding a trash enclosure on the plan. Member Thompson asked if the front door could be moved forward toward the street. He would like to see a planter along the front fagade. Member Walsh stated that he supports the project and would like to see the planter in the front. He thinks the signage is acceptable and the site/landscape plan needs to be more developed. Member Doczi, second by Member Lockyer for approval with revisions: 1. Submit revised landscape plan to include: a.) Planter along north side of building. b.) Return with a detailed sign and landscape plan, including trash enclosure and planter in front of window and add trash enclosure; c.) Simplify the A/C roof screen. d.) Delineate spaces behind the building. AYES: DOCZI, LOCKYER, POEHLEIN, THOMPSON, WALSH, ROTMAN ABSENT: MCCOY, JAKWAY The Committee took a recess at 7:43 pm and reconvened at 7:50 pm. 4. GREG HICKEY, OWNER, PROPOSING CONSTRUCTION OF A 3,946- SQUARE FOOT SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE ON A HILLSIDE LOT E Architectural Advisory Committee Minutes March 1, 2021 City of Palm Springs LOCATED AT 2274 WINTER SUN DRIVE, ZONE: ESA-SP, PLANNING AREA 4, DESERT PALISADES SPECIFIC PLAN (CASE 3.4203 MAJ) (KL). Member Lockyer said he will recuse himself on the next two items, due to a business conflict of interest. He left the virtual meeting by turning his camera and microphone off. Planner Lyon presented the proposed project as outlined the staff memorandum. Vice Chair Rotman questioned the location of the pool relative to city's standards. NICK LAFARO, applicant, introduced the project and proposed design. He indicated the views are to the south and east with the intent the proposed layout will take advantage of these views. He described the challenges with terrain, resulting in the proposed orientation with the garage. Member Poehlein asked about the contrast in the four elevations as presented in the renderings. Vice Chair Rotman asked about the privacy wall and pool barrier design, the proposed colors/materials, and the cantilever at the master bedroom. Member Doczi discussed the front fagade and its simplicity, however, he thinks that there should be some transition between the equipment walls (to the east) that integrates the two into the landscape. He suggested this should occur on the west side as well, to allow some movement of the stone wall and tie the architecture into the site. Member Thompson referenced a similar design he's seen in Rancho Mirage and thinks the design is well done. Member Poehlein said the front fagade is imposing and agreed that the design wall could be better integrated into the site. Vice Chair Rotman agreed with other comments and staff's recommendations. Member Doczi questioned the amount of lighting proposed. Walsh, seconded by Thompson to recommend approval subject to further review of the landscape lighting. AYES: DOCZI, POEHLEIN, ABSENT: MCCOY, JAKWAY ABSTAIN: LOCKYER THOMPSON, WALSH, ROTMAN 5 Architectural Advisory Committee Minutes March 1, 2021 City of Palm Springs 5. DAVID AND PATRICIA MARINO, OWNERS, FOR A MAJOR ARCHITECTURAL APPLICATION PROPOSING A 7,125-SQUARE FOOT SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE AND ACCESSORY STRUCTURES ON A 39,940-SQUARE FOOT HILLSIDE LOT LOCATED AT 1405 ROSE AVENUE, ZONE: R-1-C (CASE 3.4208 MAJ / 7.1621 AMM / 5.1525 CUP) (KL). Member Lockyer abstained on this project. Planner Lyon presented the proposed project as outlined the staff memorandum. Member Doczi asked if there are any restrictions on the number of driveways a project can have. Vice Chair Rotman requested staff describe the Administrative Minor Modification and building height request. NICK LAFARO, applicant, said the project was designed based on the client's active lifestyle. He noted there is a 35-foot terrain variation and described the proposed design of the project. Mr. Lafaro explained the design intent with the fapade wall. Member Thompson requested clarification on the fapade wall height. (Mr. Lafaro said the wall is approximately 18 feet, 2 inches above finished floor.) Member Doczi confirmed that the highest portion of the facade wall would be approximately 27 feet above the existing curb. Vice Chair Rotman asked for clarification on the landscape walls. (Mr. Lafaro described the southerly walls, including the existing property line wall and a second wall that will be 4 feet, 6 inches in height above the pickle ball court wall.) Vice Chair Rotman asked the applicant if they considered having the pickle ball court on the interior of the site near the bocce ball court. (Mr. Lafaro responded that the bocce ball court and pool are integral activities and said the pickle ball court was a separate activity and the reason for separating from the other activities.) Vice Chair Rotman confirmed the color and materials for the house. Member Thompson asked for the reason why lighting on the pickle ball court is necessary, if the owner is a casual player as indicated by the Applicant. DAVID MARINO, applicant, responded that pickle ball can be difficult to see the ball and play during dusk. He expects that during summer months his family would play during the evening when it's cooler, thus the reason for having lighting on the court. rel Architectural Advisory Committee Minutes March 1, 2021 City of Palm Springs Member Doczi said he was concerned with the overall height of the poured in place concrete wall on the east elevation, particularly on the south side of this element, and thinks the amount of driveway space along the street seems excessive. Member Poehlein agreed that the overall size of the street fagade wall seems imposing. He thinks the integration of the wall with the building is "awkward" and appended to the house and questioned if there's a better way to intersect the roof plane with the wall elements. Vice Chair Rotman said the height of the fagade wall is a concern, noting 27 feet above the curb at the highest point is significant and may block views. Mr. Rotman expressed concern with the location of the pickle ball court due to the noise and lighting associated with such use, and felt the size of the site could accommodate the court elsewhere. He also expressed concern with the driveways. Doczi, seconded by Poehlein to continue to date uncertain to provide additional information, as follows: 1. Site sections showing impact of design on surrounding properties, and the view of the garage driveways. AYES: DOCZI, POEHLEIN, THOMPSON, WALSH, ROTMAN ABSENT: MCCOY, JAKWAY ABSTAIN: LOCKYER Member Lockyer returned to the meeting. COMMITTEE MEMBER COMMENTS: None. STAFF MEMBER COMMENTS: • Next AAC meeting will be on March 8th (instead of March 15th). The agenda will include a discussion on changes to the architectural review process, as well as regular business items. ADJOURNMENT: The Architectural Advisory Committee of the City of Palm Springs adjourned at 9:15 pm to the next regular meeting at 5:30 pm on March 8, 2021. David Newell, AICP Assistant Director of Planning 7