HomeMy WebLinkAbout2009-03-10- HSPB minutesCITY OF PALM SPRINGS
HISTORIC SITE PRESERVATION BOARD
Meeting Minutes
Tuesday, March 10, 2009
Large Conference Room, City Hall,
3200 East Tahquitz Canyon Way, Palm Springs, California 92262
BOARD MEMBERS
Present at
this Meeting
Present FY
Year-to-Date
FY 2008-2009
Excused Absences
Sidney Williams, Chair X 8 1
Brian Strahl, Vice Chair X 9 0
Sheila Grattan X 9 0
Tom DeLeeuw
John Gilmer
Barbara Marshall
X
X
X
9
9
9
0
0
0
STAFF REPRESENTATIVES:
Craig Ewing, Director of Planning Loretta Moffett, Administrative Assistant
Recording Secretary
1. The regularly scheduled HSPB meeting was called to order at 8:15 a.m., Tuesday, March 10,
2009 by Chair Sidney Williams.
2. ROLL CALL: Present: T. DeLeeuw, J. Gilmer, S. Grattan, B. Marshall, B. Strahl, and Chair S.
Williams. Staff in attendance: Director Craig Ewing, Scott Taschner, and Loretta Moffett.
3. POSTING OF AGENDA: The Agenda was available for public access at the City Hall exterior
bulletin board (west side of Council Chamber), City Clerk’s office, and Planning Services’ counter
on or before 4:00 p.m. Thursday, March 5, 2009.
4. PUBLIC COMMENTS: NONE
5. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES:
5.A Corrected Minutes from January 13, 2008 – no Board action required
5.B Minutes of the February 10, 2009 Meeting – There were three CORRECTIONS
M/S/C (Gilmer/Grattan) moved to approve the February 10, 2009 HSPB Minutes as
CORRECTED – Vote 6 Yes, 0 No, 0 Absent, 0 Abstentions – motion carried.
6. REPORT FROM THE CHAIR: Chair Williams expressed sympathy to hear of Diane Bullock’s
passing and commended Diane’s valiant fight for life against the cancer – Diane will be missed by
everyone. Chair Williams commented on the recent newspaper article on the Racquet Club and
that Mr. Mueller advised that the Vineyard Bank in Corona is now the owner of the site and as of
this week it is officially going into foreclosure. She also reported that Modernism Week was a
tremendous success with a 25% increase in attendance over the last year.
Historic Site Preservation Board Page 2 of 5
Minutes from the March 10, 2009 Meeting
Board member John Gilmer asked if Board members could actually visit the Racquet Club site to
see the condition of the properties.
Director Ewing stated that staff will contact Vineyard Bank, confirm information as to their taking
possession of the property, and will work with them toward securing the existing restaurant and
the new building under construction along with whatever properties that may need attention. Staff
will also work with the bank as to visiting the site and inspecting.
7. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
7.A Case 3.0829/HSPB 70 – Application by City for Class 1 Historic Designation HSPB 70
of the West Façade of Palm Springs International Airport- HSPB 70, 3400 East Tahquitz
Canyon Way, Zone A, Section 18.
Assistant Planner Scott Taschner briefly described the project stating that it is exempt from CEQA
review, all property owners within 400 feet were notified, and staff recommends that HSPB
recommend to Council for designation of the West Façade of the Palm Springs Inter national
Airport as Class 1 Historic Site 70.
Discussion: Board member concerns included impact on front area and landscaping; FAA
requirements, regulations, and authority; FAA mandates be submitted in writing for review by City
and staff; security measures; potential restoration of the boxed-over steel columns back to original
exposed construction; expedient response in case of emergencies, walls of glass, designation
seems more honorary, etc.
PUBLIC COMMENTS RE THIS SUBJECT: NONE
M/S/C (Grattan/Strahl) moved to approve the application as presented and recommend to
Council that the West Façade of the Palm Springs International Airport be considered for
Class 1 Historic Site Designation – HSPB 70. Vote 5 Yes, 1 No (Marshall), 0 Absent,
0 Abstentions. Motion carried.
8. CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL REQUEST:
8.A Case No. SI 09-013 Palm Springs Redevelopment Agency for a monument sign at the Palm
Springs Visitors Center (Tramway Gas Station, Class 1 Historic Site-HSPB #33/37) at 2901 North
Palm Canyon Drive, Zone C-1, Section 3. (ST)
Assistant Planner Scott Taschner described the project, and referred to the Staff Report for
comments and suggestions from the Architectural Advisory Committee as to a re-design of the
sign keeping it within the historic nature of the Tramway Gas Station. The proposed permanent
monument sign complies with the Zoning Codes and fonts have been changed to match the Palm
Springs entry sign. A pole sign designed some time ago was displayed for information. Because
of its simple modern design and distance (approx 100 feet) from the historic structure, staff
recommends that the HSPB issue a Certificate of Approval for the proposed sign.
Board discussion and concerns included better visibility, location, matching fonts, raised or
elevated sign would prevent graffiti and increase visibility, proposed sign is too low-key and bland,
pole sign is more compatible with the historic building, and maintenance on the temporary sign
until funds could be raised for a more appropriately designed sign.
Historic Site Preservation Board Page 3 of 5
Minutes from the March 10, 2009 Meeting
Director Ewing explained that the HSPB role is to determine if the proposed sign has an adverse
effect on the historic character of the site.
Board member Strahl moved for denial of this application because the characteristics of
the proposed sign do not support the historic nature of the building and a more airy,
open-type sign would be more appropriate and compatible to the building – a former gas
station.
M/S/C (Strahl/Marshall) moved to approve the motion as stated above – Vote 5 Yes, 1 No
(Grattan), 0 Absent, 0 Abstentions. Motion carried.
9. OTHER BUSINESS:
9.A Policies and Procedures for Referring Matters that Affect Class 1 Building Sites to the
Historic Site Preservation Board – Board member Marshall
Director Ewing explained that when a property is designated for Class 1, it is subject to review by
the City under Chapter 8.05 of the Municipal Code – Historic Resources. There are certain
thresholds for review that are both explicit and implied in that Ordinance. Anything that is a
maintenance item (minor repairs, painting, etc.), using the same colors and materials, staff
handles over-the-counter.
Another area of staff concern is when more substantial changes are happening on the property,
but not necessarily to the historic building or structure. It is not always clear where those other
changes fall within the Ordinance. An example might be the landscaping outside a building. To
designate a building, someone might want to take down trees and plant new trees – that might
affect views of the building. If the designation is clear that it’s the building/structure that is historic,
staff does not extend that authority and review to landscaping or to walls or other elements of the
property/site. Decisions might or will be made by staff that determine what changes, opposed to
the site, rise to the level of requiring a Certificate of Approval and what will come before HSPB.
Staff has recently has sought greater specificity in the description of a historic resource. The
clearer historic features of the site are identified in the designation, the easier it is to move forward
with the architect, designer, property owners, etc. He further commented on the City’s review
authority regarding additions or changes to the site(s) that don’t physically alter the designated
historic resource. Unless specifically stated, the Ordinance does not prevent a wall being
constructed around a historic structure. If there is a historic building and someone wants to
screen it from view, that doesn’t appear to be a violation of the law. Staff will look at designations
and modifications on a case-by-case basis – absent clear statement of what is protected under
the historic designations on record. For City-owned historic properties, the City is subject to the
same laws as private property owners. Council can be approached when modifications impact
important aspects of a designated property.
Board member concerns included art in public places (such as a very modern piece in front of a
very old historic building), sensitivity to the whole appearance of the setting/site of a historic
property is as important as the structure itself, obscuring public views of Class 1 historic sites,
designation specifics need to be very clear and precise,
9.B Historic Districts Discussion and Proposals for Moving Forward with Initial Designations –
Board member Gilmer
Historic Site Preservation Board Page 4 of 5
Minutes from the March 10, 2009 Meeting
Board member Gilmer handed out information from the National Parks Service about creating
and using design guidelines pertaining to historic districts. These materials can be used as
examples during the process and goals of HSPB creating historic districts. Members were urged
to review this information in preparation to move forward with Historic Districts in Palm Springs.
This will be a future agenda item – with talking points - after members have studied all the
documents and information. He spoke with Patrick McGrew who had compiled a list of potential
districts that included (1) Araby Tract – 19320a); (2) Deepwell Ranch; (3) Old Las Palmas; (4)
Little Tuscany; (5) Main Street aka Palm Canyon Drive; (6) Mesa – 1920s; (7) Movie Colony –
1930s; (8) Smoke Tree Ranch – (eligible for National, California, and local designation; (9)
Southridge; (10) Tennis Club area; (11) Twin Palms; (12) Western portion of Warm Sands –
1920s-30s. There is no clarity of what a Historic District is, what the requirements are or would
be; and the Board needs to develop good, specific guidelines when recommending to City
Council.
Board member Grattan asked for discussion about where designation emanates from. She
recalled that the Council appears to want assurance that movement for designation would come
from the homeowners within the specific areas and that it would not be super-imposed upon
them. The Board discussed and reviewed most of the 12 sites listed above about two years ago
– Board needs to be very careful how this is approached and presented to homeowners.
Director Ewing will send the 11 points the Planning Commission considered in identifying overlay
zones for neighborhoods, which has similarities to Historic Districts. Both would imply more
tailored approaches to future design, development, and redevelopment of groups of properties.
10. COMMITTEE REPORTS AND SPECIAL PROJECTS:
10.A P.S. Preservation Foundation (www.pspreservationfoundation.org) - Board member Strahl
heard from the President of the Foundation and PSPF continues with their free online
memberships. The Retro Martini Fundraising Party was a big success – photos will be on their
website. There were about 70 citizens at the February 18 Council meeting re the Baristo Lofts
project, but it was continued. PSPF comments and information are on the website.
10.B P.S. Modern Committee (www.psmodcom.com) - Board member Barbara Marshall reported
that Modernism Week was a great success. They continue to monitor Council’s agendas for
the re-appearance of Baristo Lofts (Santa Fe Federal Building) and the Desert Fashion Plaza’s
Specific Plan.
10.C P.S. Historical Society (www.pshistoricalsociety.org) - Board member Sheila Grattan – The
new book by Moya Henderson is available and 2009 Calendars are still available.
10.D Architecture and Design Council (www.psmuseum.org) - Board member John Gilmer – The
Patrick McGrew Architecture 101 lecture last month on “Bill Cody” was sold out. The Ron &
Jason Hill lecture was well attended. Peter Moruzzi’s lecture “Havana Before Castro” had 375
attendees during Modernism Week. The Frey House II Tours had 266 participants – they had to
hire a larger bus. The Symposium “Possessed – Obsession of Ownership” was also extremely
successful – 132 attended the lecture and tour. The next lecture “Good Modernism Now” is
March 21 at 6 p.m. in the Annenberg Theater, with Steven Kanner of Kanner Architects, from Los
Angeles. The May 2 6 p.m. lecture will be “Practices of Encroachment: Urban Waste Moves
Southbound, Illegal Zoning Seeps into North” by Teddy Cruz, architect, estudio teddy cruz, San
Diego. Bill Butler will lecture about “Donald Wexler” March 28 at 10 a.m. in the Architecture 101
Historic Site Preservation Board Page 5 of 5
Minutes from the March 10, 2009 Meeting
Series. Sidney Williams’ lecture about “E. Stewart Williams” will be April 25 at 10 a.m. Tickets
for all events can be purchased at the Museum Box Office or 760-325-4490.
10.E Web Site Development – Board members John Gilmer & Tom DeLeeuw – No report
11. STAFF & OTHER REPORTS:
11.A Baristo Lofts update from Council Meeting of February 18, 2009 – Director Ewing reported
that the Baristo Lofts hearing by Council was continued and will be re-noticed – everyone will be
advised.
11.B Update from Joint Meeting with City Council February 11, 2009 - Historic Districts, demo-
ition by neglect, etc. were discussed and Code Enforcement will be monitoring properties that
may be subject to neglect. During the joint meeting, someone suggested researching how other
cities deal with the neglect issues. Staff will check on this and update the Board by email.
11.C Research into City Ordinances regarding demolition and property maintenance – covered in
11.B above.
12. BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS:
Board member DeLeeuw asked for an update on what properties have been approved by HSPB
and sent to City Council, but have not been approved nor had any action by Council, and what
properties are next in line.
Board member Strahl asked for an update on the Oasis Commercial Building which has already
been nominated by HSPB for Class 1 designation.
Board member Marshall asked about status of La Serena Villas potential sale, future of the site.
Staff will follow-up, review with Chair Williams, bring it back to HSPB if needed, or move it on to
Council. La Serena Villas are monitored on a bi-weekly basis by code enforcement and building
inspectors. It appears to be about the same. The City is not privy to what is happening between
the current owners and any potential buyers. The property owners have asked for additional time
and the Council has granted that. There will be a hearing in April about the Stay of Demolition.
Chair Williams reported there was a 25% increase in attendance for Modernism Week this year
over 2008 and over a $2 million economic impact to the City. She reminded everyone that the
California Preservation Foundation’s Annual Conference is here in Palm Springs April 16 – 19.
Volunteers from the community to assist during the Conference are being sought – Emily Christie
at the P.S. Museum is coordinating the volunteers – those interested please call 322-4818.
Volunteers will get free access to many of the events.
13. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 9:44 a.m. in memory of Diane Bullock to its
regularly scheduled meeting on April 14, 2009 in the Large Conference Room at City Hall.
Respectfully submitted,
Craig A. Ewing, AICP
Director of Planning