Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2003-10-14- HSPB minutesCITY OF PALM SPRINGS HISTORIC SITE PRESERVATION BOARD MEETING Minutes of Regular Meeting -Tuesday, October 14, 2003, 8:15 a.m. Large Conference Room, City Hall, 3200 E. Tahquitz Canyon Way Palm Springs, California 92262 ROLL CALL Present This Meeting Present Yea-to-Date FY 2003-2004 Excused Absences To-Date John Williams, Chairman X 2 Shevlin Rush, Vice Chair X 2 Lee Bledsoe 1 1 Ron Chespak X 2 James Hayton X 1 1 William Scott X 2 Jim Isermann 1 1 STAFF PRESENT: Doug Evans, Director of Planning and Zoning Jing Yeo, Associate Planner Loretta Moffett, Senior Secretary * * * * * Chairman Williams called the meeting to order at 8:25.m. * * * * * * REPORT OF POSTING OF AGENDA: The Agenda was available and posted in accordance with state and local procedures for public access at the City Hall exterior bulletin board and the Department of Planning & Zoning counter by 4:00 p.m., Thursday, October 9, 2003. * * * * * * PUBLIC COMMENTS: NONE * * * * * * APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Chairman Williams asked for comments or corrections for the September 9, 2003 Minutes. M/S/C (Hayton / Scott) (5 Yes, 0 No, 2 Absent, 0 Abstentions) to approve the September 9, 2003 Board Minutes as presented. CHAIRMAN=S REPORT: Chairman Williams announced that Board Members Isermann and Williams as a Board approved sub-committee, met with staff regarding the Fire station cameras based on staff recommendation. The sub-committee did approve two dome-type cameras to be placed on the left side of the building and one 22-inch camera in back of the building. The First Chief seemed happy with that and it was a good compromise. It is hoped that City staff will follow-up on installing the historic plaque on the building. ARCHITECTURAL APPROVAL: Case 3.2098 - Application by Catherine Meyler for a landscape plan at 2311 North Indian Canyon Drive, Zone R-2, Section 3. Associate Planner Jing Yeo re-introduced the property - The Grace Miller House a Class 1 Historic Site. Staff and Board have been working with Ms. Meyler related to various improvements proposed and today the landscape plan will be presented. Catherine Meyler described the current landscape as being more sparse than the original and explained that it was designed for a 25% viewing corridor as well as privacy. Original plants had grown up very very close to the house, (1940's photos were passed round) which is not what Ms. Meyler prefers. Keeping plants away from the house sets the house off for better viewing. Ms. Meyler introduced Warren Miller, the landscape designer, who talked about the concept of visualizing the house from the view area as well as providing the privacy that the property owner wants to establish. The plan is to give the property more of a >desert look=. No plant material around the house, there is an accentual ocotillo and a couple of Texas Rangers, but for the most part, the house will be left open for view from the corridor. There will be some cactus along the drive to assist with security. Drive will be gravel and decorative and native sand, with lots of boulders. There is a two-story apartment complex next door, the acacia will provide wind resistance and privacy. The Blue Leaf Waddle trees will be planted about six feet apart, they are weeping, lacy trees. There will be hesperaloe, cardera, (msp) pampas grass, etc. Plants are desert and/or low water type plants...palo verde, mesquites, and acacia. Director Evans pointed out that if the trees are planted as close as the plan depicts the first five years will be wonderful, then the trees will fight one another and will have to be thinned out. Mr. Miller agreed that thinning at a later date will be required and will be evaluated and addressed at that time. The plantings will be more traditional and desert. The pool is not in as yet and an area will be left open for that to be installed at a later time. It was asked where the plaque will be installed and Director Evans advised that staff will work with Ms. Meyler so when landscaping is complete, the plaque will be installed in a location where plants do not obstruct it and in where Ms. Meyler would want the public to be. Wherever the plaque is installed is where the viewing public will gather. M/S/C (Scott/Rush) 5 Yes, 0 No, 2 Absent, 0 Abstention that the application be approved as presented. AGENDA ITEM #1: WORK PROGRAM 2003/2004 The Board packet provided a copy of the Work Program for 2003 which the Board approved some time ago. Chairman Williams pointed out that on the back of that document are the approvals and denials in 2002 and asked staff for an update on the door alteration at 800 North Palm Canyon Drive the Board to review and it that had been resolved. Director Evans advised the Board that no legal proceedings have been initiated against the property owner who had indicated the property might be sold. Staff felt they have more luck with property owners. If the Board wishes to pursue this it would request legal action to enforce the issue. If any Board Members who know the property owner, the might call them. Prior attempts have not been successful, the property owner wants the building de-classified and is very firm HSPB Meeting Minutes Page 3 of 8 October 14, 2003 based on the fact that the building has been substantially altered over the years. They question if it should have been designated in the first place. Chairman Williams referred to the Work Program for 2003 which is done on a calendar year and asked Director Evans to discuss the program. Director Evans went over the items in the Work Program: 1. Funding: Associate Planner Kathy Marx will update the Board on a conference she attended that addressed Historic Preservation funding sources. 2. Master Plan for Historic Preservation: This is part of the General Plan update and copies were given to the Board for review and their comments. That review has been started via the General Plan Steering Committee and Board Member Scott is serving on this Committee. Board Member Scott advised that everyone is invited to attend these meetings. The next one is October 30 in this conference room at 5 p.m. The Committee is comprised of people throughout the community, i.e. neighborhood groups, economic representatives, Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians, etc. Will be refining the Vision Statement at the next meeting and the next step is how to achieve the Vision Statement, then start working on the Master Plan Update. There are about 23 people on the Steering Committee. Attendance has been good for these meetings and it=s a very diverse group. 3. Ordinance Revision: This has been discussed by the Board and how to deal with the survey. Eventually that will go into the Ordinance and the likelihood that staff may have to consider de-listing...the Aundoing@ process. The City Attorney and staff feel that there are other areas to be clarified in the Ordinance. Staff has not pushed the City Attorney to deal with the de-listing, but that will come up based upon what happens in the courts. 4. Plaques: Board and staff have been working on the plaquing of historic sites and Board Member Rush has done a survey of all the plaques. Staff will continue to try to get all the Class 1 sites plaqued as quickly as possible. HSPB Meeting Minutes Page 4 of 8 October 14, 2003 5. Survey Update: This will be discussed later in this meeting. 6. Local, State, and National Historic Designations: Kathy Marx updated the Board on SHPO re the Frances Stevens Nomination going before the Historic Advisory Committee November 7, 2003 on the Consent Agenda calendar. This means that SHPO has reviewed the nomination and has given their staff recommendation for approval. Consequently, they will give a brief slide presentation for that nomination plus others at the beginning of the meeting and if no one has objected or objects, then the nominations are approved. It=s not a contentious nomination, which is very good. It=s going to be at the Pasadena City Hall Council Chambers at 9 a.m. November 7 and anyone is welcome to attend. 7. Historic Preservation Public Information Program: The Board had envisioned working on this the early part of next year in conjunction with the survey to try to talk with owners of buildings that are not designated that the survey has identified, especially the most historic fifty (50) to get them moving toward Class 1 designations. That will carry on to the Work Program for next year. Chairman Williams asked for other comments on this year=s work agenda and ideas for next year and asked the Board Members to give thought to this and present their ideas at the next two meetings. Director Evans explained that this needs to be in place and submitted to the City Council about mid-January. The next two months are open for items to add into this program, perhaps expanding the public information program, clarify what the Board is actually doing. AGENDA #2: MEDIA OUTREACH SUB-COMMITTEE UPDATE - BOARD MEMBER RUSH Not much to report on the media outreach, but suggested a meeting with staff to establish a time line through the next 12 months, such as the Frances Stevens School, the survey finalization, etc., and identify the opportunities for media outreach as they come up over the next year. This could be a working document that changes depending on what new things come up, to be sure the Board and staff are aware of those opportunities and are acting on them within the time frame of when they are happening. The survey finalization should present several opportunities for media. Will contact staff outside of the meeting to discuss ideas and develop a time line. HSPB Meeting Minutes Page 5 of 8 October 14, 2003 Comments were that it=s been disappointing that nothing has been seen in the papers about the survey in progress, but perhaps information can be gotten out when it is finalized. Director Evans advised that a press release was published to try to gain the interest of the local newspaper, but nothing came of it. Chairman Williams offered to work the Board Member Rush to try to set up a meeting with Brian Joseph of the Desert Sun to get them aware of what the HSP Board is doing and asked if that is something that can be done as Board Members. Director Evans explained that the Board has to work with Lee Husfeldt, the City=s Public Information Officer before Board members go out to initiate media. The City Manager and City Council have to be aware in advance of what is being done. The challenge with the media is that they can be fed all the information possible and when the issue comes on the agenda, the news day influences whether or not coverage is given. With Ms. Husfeldt=s help, Board and staff can start setting the frame work for a article, as opposed to a news bulletin, such as talking about what the survey is, what it means, layer in Frances Stevens School >s State designation. Try to give a good story because good news really has to be pitched....it there is not something Astirring@ it=s hard to create an article. In the meeting, also bring in Rick from Channel 17, and what he and his staff are capable of doing, a photographic piece that can run on channel 17 as normal programming. AGENDA ITEM #3: HISTORIC SITE PLAQUE SURVEY UPDATE - BOARD MEMBER RUSH Distributed the revised Plaque Report because Frances Stevens School was inadvertently left off and in the section pending plaques have been listed including the Grace Lewis Miller and the Edris houses. There is a reception featuring the historic designation on the Edris house which will be October 18 and it is hoped the plaque will be available to present. HSPB Meeting Minutes Page 6 of 8 October 14, 2003 Perhaps another meeting with staff to contact property owners for those plaques listed as Anot visible@ to determine what the messaging to the property owners to coordinate and resolve these issues. Board Member Scott pointed out two Mills Act properties listed as Anot visible@ and the agreement criteria is that plaques will be visible: Carey-Pirozzi and Kaufmann-Harris houses. Director Evans explained that in the Pirozzi house it was between the home owner and installer to select a suitable rock or boulder to mount the plaque on and the most suitable was not a good location and lost the priority of having it visible. The owner of the Kaufmann-Harris house did not like the bronze plaque, staff could possibly work with them to switch to a brushed aluminum-type plaque which might resolve their concern. They are bombarded with people who want to see their property and it=s a delicate balance of public versus private relationships on that house. Staff will have to double check to see if those listed as Anot visible@ were officially plaqued and/or go out and physically try to locate the plaques. Staff will do some records research. Board Member Rush asked about the cost of plaquing. It was reported that the plaque costs about $268 plus shipping. Director Evans reported there are funds to do the plaques and the larger plaques are about $1,000. The City had an employee who volunteered to install the plaques, but he has since retired and there may not be another person who can or is willing to do this. If a professional installer is required, the cost may go up several hundred dollars as the procedure requires to go out, find a suitable location, get the materials and equipment to install, transport that to the site, do the installation, etc. Board Member Chespak asked if this could be upgraded so that we have a reliable person to install plaques and be available when other sites are designated so that staff and Board knows that plaques are being installed correctly and timely. Director Evans explained that going out for a bid and having a contractor on board to install infrequent plaques, the contract would go stale. Staff will call to John at his home to see if he would be interested in continuing these installations. Installation of the plaques is not the problem. Staff will work with Board Member Rush to establish a routine for these plaque installations. Will HSPB Meeting Minutes Page 7 of 8 October 14, 2003 try for an update at the next meeting, Planning is short-handed at the moment and everyone has a heavy workload. Chairman Williams advised that he knows of two sites that are not plaqued...the Ingleside Inn and the Fire Station. An update by staff at the next HSPB meeting would be appreciated. AGENDA ITEM #4: CALIFORNIA PRESERVATION FOUNDATIONS= INCENTIVE FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION PROJECT WORKSHOP - ASSOCIATE PLANNER KATHY MARX Kathy Marx attended this workshop on September 26, 2003 in Berkeley and reported that it was extremely interesting and intense. She gathered quite a lot of information, including a CD which can be downloaded for detailed information. Federal, City, and State incentives programs were presented and examples were supplied for Board review. A summary of the day=s workshops was provided in the Board=s packet and those applicable to Palm Springs were underlined. The second half of the day (page 2, section D of the summary) for local incentives was to do the most with the least amount of money which utilized different components: Zoning incentives, Permit review streamlining, Mills Act, Historic Building Code, Facade program, Historic preservation grants, and transfer of development rights. Example: Single-family historic home in a single family location, flexibility was allowed in the zoning to perhaps allow for a gallery downstairs and residence upstairs; review of parking requirements, etc. These were on a case-by-case basis. Palm Springs is active in many of these areas. One interesting comment re the Mills Act is that it can be used for condominiums, townhouses and homeowner association type properties. Brochures were available for Board review, and copies can be made for anyone interested. Director Evans thanked Kathy for seeking out this workshop and paying for some of the expenses out of her own pocket. She went above and beyond on this and brought back valuable information. AGENDA ITEM #5: FRANCES STEVENS SCHOOL CALIFORNIA REGISTER OF HISTORIC RESOURCES NOMINATION UPDATE - ASSOCIATE PLANNER KATHY MARX HSPB Meeting Minutes Page 8 of 8 October 14, 2003 This was discussed earlier in the Work Program and does not have anything more to add. Had to do a lot of extra work on that one after the initial information was submitted as the State asked for additional information. It is available for anyone who wishes to see all the details. Director Evans again thanked Kathy for all the outside work done on this nomination and congratulated her on getting her Afirst@ application on the State Consent Calendar. It is a credit to how hard she worked. It will help to have someone in the audience from Palm Springs when this comes up at the November 7 meeting. Staff will talk with the City Council to see if there is any interest in attending. The State Boards like to see representation from the City where a property is up for nomination and designation. Chairman Williams asked if staff knew of any Coachella Valley properties currently on the California Register and asked if staff would research this. Kathy Marx advised that Tahquitz Canyon is an archeological site, but she=s not aware of any other Coachella Valley property. She is working with the property owner of the O=Donnell house to get it listed on the National Register. Director Evans reported that one of the very early schools in Coachella may be on the State Register. Staff will check if the Board wants that information. The Internet could give us most of that information and this could be a target for getting the Desert Sun involved. It was asked if there is going to be a presentation to the Council about this and if Board Members should attend. Director Evans thought that a Areceive and file@ report could be done for one of the next Council meetings. AGENDA ITEM #6: HISTORIC SITE SURVEY PROCESS, CONTACT, AND CONSULTANT REPORT Associate Planner Jing Yeo reported that all the Board=s recommendations were forwarded to the Consultant. They are now trying to select the first 100 properties which will be given to us before they proceed further. The Ashaded@ properties on the spreadsheet handed out to all Board Members are those recommended properties which have been sent to the Consultants. Properties not on the original list, but submitted by Board members are listed on the last page of HSPB Meeting Minutes Page 9 of 8 October 14, 2003 this spreadsheet. Some of the Board Member=s recommendations were forwarded direct to the Consultant and are not on this spreadsheet. Those will be added to the spreadsheet so all properties will be itemized. Director Evans advised that a few Anames@ were taken off the list for privacy issues, their properties are still listed...just not the names of current owners. Planner Yeo updated the Board as to Consultant cost for an unscheduled trip to Palm Springs related to obscured properties. Staff has asked for a quote for this unexpected part of the survey. They came back a little under $9,000, and the problem is that any contract over $5,000 has to go back to City Council. Staff then asked them to re-evaluate the number of properties they will be looking at. Director Evans advised that there are fund available but it would mean trading out some plaques for this work. Council has allowed a carryover of un-used funds in this category from year-to-year, but do we want to do another task. The next time there is a review, someone will come up with additional properties staff should look at. Staff now asks the Board think about whether or not we ask the Consultant to finish with what can be done now, then come back as a second phase and look at additional properties that may also include preparing designations. The challenge in bringing them back is that multi-people are required, they do travel frugally, but the hours required for field work really add up. Staff is debating whether or not to put another Work Program together that next year obscured properties are viewed as a different work effort. Decision must be made within the next week or so as the earliest this could go to Council would be November for a contract amendment, but eventually the work must be done. Board needs to let staff know ASAP. Board Member Rush asked if it would be up to the City Council to approve the use of plaque funds for these costs. Director Evans will have to advise the Council where the money is and why it is necessary. There may be a need to augment this report. The money needs to be spent as wisely as possible. Staff may ask Consultant to work faster and to sharpen their pencils for a better quote. A very quick HSPB Meeting Minutes Page 10 of 8 October 14, 2003 triage of properties in the field may be worth looking at. The update of properties the Consultants had to re-visit has not been received. Board will look forward to a survey update at the next meeting and the first 100 properties by the end of November 2003. AGENDA ITEM #7: DISCUSSION OF CITY=S HISTORIC PRESERVATION ORDINANCE Update was given in the Work Program report. AGENDA ITEM #8: PALM SPRINGS PRESERVATION FOUNDATION - BOARD MEMBER SCOTT The Foundation will be hosting an event on Saturday, November 15, 2003 ACelebrating the Spanish Revival Colonial Architecture of the City@ with a unique bus tour starting at a house called In vernata, which has never been open to the public and is in remarkable condition. The tour will involve private and commercial properties and will end up at Casa La Luna, the Johnny Mercer house, for a cocktail reception from 1 p.m. to 6 p.m. Notification will be sent to membership and mailing lists and will be limited to 100 people. It is $100 for members and $125 for non-members. Check the web site at wwpspf.net for additional information or contact the Foundation directly. Director Evans asked for the Preservation Foundation, ModCom, and the Historical Society to write letters to SHPO in support of the Frances Stevens School designation. It would be very helpful, the State just counts them and it does help if there are questions. AGENDA ITEM #9: PALM SPRINGS HISTORICAL SOCIETY - BOARD MEMBER BLEDSOE Board Member absent. AGENDA ITEM #10: PALM SPRINGS MODERN COMMITTEE - BOARD CHAIRMAN WILLIAMS A home tour is scheduled for November 8, 2003 from 10 a.m. to 4 p.m. with a reception in the event. It is not limited to Palm Springs, the Frank Sinatra house (built 1947) and the Keniston (msp) house (1957), both Stewart Williams designed and in Rancho Mirage, are included in this tour. This last house is featured as the Mates house in ABoy Meets Boy@, and several other homes and condos. The cost is $50 for members, $65 for non-members. The web site is www.psmodcom.com. HSPB Meeting Minutes Page 11 of 8 October 14, 2003 AGENDA ITEM #11: PALM SPRINGS BRIEF HISTORY & ARCHITECTURAL GUIDE UPDATE Planner Yeo reported that is ready to go to print. There were only about eight (8) properties that are not historic sites, so the brochure shows which properties are not designated by an * in the Index. Chairman Williams will look at it and perhaps this could be a press item once published. Board Member Rush suggested that these brochures be sent to travel editors of LA Times and other neighboring newspapers to increase awareness of architecture in this area as well as tourism. Director Evans advised that the Tourism Bureau generally sends every brochure of this nature to publication to generate press. BOARD AND STAFF REPORTS: Chairman Williams asked that (1) a report from the Architecture and Design Council from the Palm Springs Desert Museum be added as a regular Agenda item. Contact is Jim Isermann. They are sponsoring the reception for the Edris House designation on October 18, 2003; and (2) the Historic Site #23 is Community Church at 284 South Cahuilla Road redevelopment project. Director Evans reported that on the designated property (original church site) there are no plans on file yet. The property owner is intending to renovate it into a bed and breakfast inn. The more contemporary church is slated for redevelopment on this site as is one fairly old home. The interior has been modified and the structural integrity has not been evaluated. It could possibly be relocated. Some residents asked during a neighborhood meeting if the house could be incorporated into the new project and it doesn=t work economically to try to keep an old house on a small site. The house was built sometime in the 1930's and has never shown up on any historic surveys. Staff feels it is a strong project for that neighborhood and residents seem pleased. The Board will be involved when the plans come around for the Class 1 site. Board Member Chespak referred to Item #11 - the Architectural Guide and hoped that staff let everyone see his revisions re the cover and new wording. He did not hear from anyone working HSPB Meeting Minutes Page 12 of 8 October 14, 2003 on the brochure and feels that the Board=s name is on this brochure and it=s important that all Board members agree on this before it is printed. Planner Yeo advised that she and Tracy Conrad reviewed all revisions and edits. Chairman Williams visited the Tramway Gas Station and the wall has been partially cut down and it is still quite a lot higher than depicted in earlier meetings. Will more be cut down...he read from earlier minutes...he measured the wall and it measures 49 to 50 inches in some places. Director Evans explained that when O=Donnell and Escalante Architects looked at the wall and reported to the Commission and HSP Board, they did not know where all the bond beams were. A field determination had to be made as to where the best place to cut it would be, which resulted in it being cut higher than lower. The operational concern of the people who have to operate and maintain the liability aspects of that building. The City Council approved the specs relative to construction of the building. There is a security concern about all the public activity that will be taking place around that building was an issue. The Board could make a recommendation to the City Council , but there is no money in the budget to cut it a second time. Board Member Scott indicated that in walking along the side walk, at places it is six (6) feet high and objects strongly to the wall being that high. It blocks the view of the gas station from any pedestrians or from drive-bys and feels that the Board was mis-lead on this. It was a big issue from the beginning and the Board could have met at the site and worked with the team. He would like to see a different solution. The Board was instructed as to the original planned height, but not instructed to the change in the height. Director Evans advised that it is not on the Agenda. The board can ask for reports and make comments, but the Board cannot take action or give direction. There could be a special meeting called to address the Boards concerns and direction. Staff=s role is to guide the Board on proper procedures of conducting public meetings and in this instance a special meeting could be called for tomorrow, but the item needs to be on the agenda before the Board can give directions or instructions. The entire team can be brought in to discuss what happened so the Board can have all the information then that action can be taken to the Council. HSPB Meeting Minutes Page 13 of 8 October 14, 2003 Chairman Williams commented that this is a historic site, the Board was given information that was very controversial and the Board agreed as to what it felt should be done, changes were made and the Board was not even a part of the process. This is a concern. Board Member Rush asked if the process for changes in construction that are done to Class 1 projects going forward could be discussed. Director Evans advised that it could not be discussed today. The Board is limited to what is listed on the Agenda and the Agenda has to be specific so the public knows what the Board is going to talk about in detail. Asking staff what happened, staff=s response to what happened is allowarble under Board and Staff Reports. A 24-hour notice is required for a special meeting, so it could be held tomorrow and with the Chairman=s concurrence, staff will try to get the team here. Chairman Williams asked if, at this special meeting, issues like this can be handled or should this be at the next meeting. Director Evans advised that the Board could ask for whatever they wanted to be on the agenda. The first item could be the concerns on this project, the secondary item could be the process. A quorum would be necessary for a special meeting. Board Member Hayton stated that it would be a great expense to bring all these people in for a special meeting and asked if the Board would have an opportunity to take a look at the situation briefly before a decision is made to call this special meeting? For example...he has not visited the site and seen the situation and would like to so before the special meeting. Director Evans will try to put together information, will check the project schedule, with information from the project manager=s perspective for the Chairman and fax to the Board members. Staff will call the project manager as quickly as possible. Chairman Williams asked if alternatives to lowering the wall and costs could be looked at or what type of information will the staff provide? It=s a big issue and needs to be addressed. What is the completion date of the Visitor=s Center? HSPB Meeting Minutes Page 14 of 8 October 14, 2003 Agenda Item #11: Jing Yeo brought back Board Member Chespak=s suggested revisions to the Architectural Guide and passed it to all Board Members for review. Member Chespak suggested renaming it to Palm Springs Architectural Guide and move the golfers off the cover. These images are ready available and re-iterated that he was assured this would be handed out to everyone. He wants to be more active in the next edit and publication and not an 11th hour decision. Chairman Williams asked how much of a history was actually in the guide and preferred that Brief History should stay in the title and likes the way it is. Director Evans advised that the golfers on the cover was an original image of the old El Mirador Hotel with a putting green. Board Member Hayton stated that this area is noted for its golfing and feels the original cover provides a broader view and is more effective. Board discussion determined that no changes be made for this edition and that changes can be made the next time the brochure is edited and published. Board Member Rush asked that in any correspondence where there is a Acc@ field or changes made in prior Board approved documents that all Board Members be copied. Director Evans explained that when this was started it was meant to be a very fast turn-around, but that didn=t work out and has been going on for a long time. Everyone got anxious to get this printed once all the information was in. Chairman Williams asked for additional reports, comments, etc., there being none, the meeting was adjourned at 10:06 a.m. November 11 is a holiday for City staff, so the next meeting will be Wednesday, November 12, at 8:15 a.m. in this conference room. Respectfully submitted, Douglas R. Evans HSPB Meeting Minutes Page 15 of 8 October 14, 2003 Director of Planning and Zoning :ldm HSPB Minutes, October 14,,2003