HomeMy WebLinkAbout2014-11-12 PC Study Session MinutesCITY OF PALM SPRINGS
PLANNING COMMISSION STUDY SESSION MINUTES
November 12, 2014
Large Conference Room, City Hall
3200 E. Tahquitz Canyon Way
Palm Springs, CA 92262
CALLED TO ORDER:
Chair Hudson called the meeting to order at 11:32 am.
ROLL CALL:
PRESENT: Commissioner Calerdine, Commissioner Lowe, Commissioner
Middleton, Commissioner Roberts, Commissioner Weremiuk, Vice -
Chair Klatchko and Chair Hudson
ABSENT: None
ALSO PRESENT: Planning Director Fagg and Principal Planner Roberts
REPORT OF POSTING OF AGENDA: The agenda was available for public access at
the City Hall exterior bulletin board (west side of Council Chamber) and the Planning
Services counter by 10:00 am on Tuesday, November 4, 2014.
PUBLIC COMMENTS: None.
DISCUSSION ITEMS:
1. REVIEW OF CELL TOWER REGULATIONS.
Discussion:
• Presentation by Dennis Hurvitz, PE, of Desert Engineers, regarding cell tower
technology and coverage.
• Commissioner Roberts voiced concerns about cell tower height and the accuracy
of coverage maps. He expressed a preference for evaluating applications on a
case -by -case basis, and was comfortable with the city's current cell tower
ordinance. However, he would prefer that there be independent consultation and
neutral analysis of coverage maps, and offered that applicants should pay for any
additional costs related to this review.
• Commissioner Weremiuk noted that the city's ordinance is outdated and needs to
be updated to properly address height, setbacks, and adequate guidelines for
review of cell tower applications. She also noted a preference for monopoles
versus the "monopalm" design. She also suggested that applicants need to
Planning Commission Study Session Minutes
November 12, 2014
show the locations of all their towers as part of any new applications, and that
wireless equipment should be inconspicuously mounted on the new hotel
buildings that are being proposed. The Commissioner noted any new ordinance
would need the support of City Council, and that the goals for cell tower
regulation for both groups should be aligned.
• Chair Hudson noted that residents may prefer the monopalm design, but the
monopole is necessary to get co -location of equipment. He also suggested that
the city needs a coordinated master plan for cell towers, and to look ahead at
continued growth in wireless usage.
• Commissioner Middleton noted that context is important when installing a
monopalm tower and that an isolated monopalm is of no value.
• Commissioner Lowe questioned if there were other technologies available to
screen or disguise cell towers equipment. He also suggested that a map should
be prepared, locating all current cell tower within the city, and to distinguish
which towers are monopoles and which are monopalms. The Commissioner felt
that the city should increase its review fee to pay for independent analysis of the
coverage maps submitted with cell tower applications.
• Commissioner Calerdine noted that coverage maps prepared by cell tower
companies rely on a standard set of variables, and can be accurate as long as
the assumptions are correct. He also recommended that it's important to
understand the net current cell coverage and how a new tower improves
coverage in the decision making process.
• Vice Chair Klatchko suggested that companies need to provide a map showing
all coverage for the company, and agreed that the city's ordinance is out of date.
He also noted that the Conditional Use Permit (CUP) process is still an
appropriate means for reviewing cell tower applications, and that changing
technology may reduce the required height of towers in the future.
•
The Commissioners questioned if the city could require co -location of providers
on cell towers and if allowing added height would get greater co -location and
reduce the overall number of towers.
Direction to Staff:
1. Staff to begin work on an updated cell tower ordinance.
2. A cell tower subcommittee should be appointed to work with staff in the
development of a new ordinance.
3. Staff to investigate the use of an independent consultant or peer review in the
evaluation of coverage maps, as well as any associated costs.
4. Staff to prepare a map of all existing cell towers within the City of Palm Springs,
noting the carrier and type of tower.
2
Planning Commission Study Session Minutes
November 12, 2014
2. REVIEW OF THE PROCESS FOR MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT IN
PLANNING COMMISSION DELIBERATIONS.
Discussion:
• Director Fagg gave a presentation outlining the purpose of findings of fact in
quasi-judicial proceedings and discussed how findings can be used to
communicate the intent of the Planning Commission to City Council. Director
Fagg explained that findings of fact are the specific facts about a case which you
use to make your decisions relevant to code requirements, testimony, CEQA
documents, etc. He provided an example of a major law case that supported the
need for findings. Director Flinn presented guidelines for the types of findings
and provided examples of a specific list of criteria why the project conforms or
does not conform to code requirements.
• Commissioner Calerdine said the findings may be a challenge to get them out in
writing.
• Director Fagg noted the AAC makes a quick list of key points discussed during
the project and presents them when making a motion.
• The Commission discussed working on being more specific when making a
motion.
Direction to Staff:
1. Staff to assist the Commission in making findings for their decisions.
2. Provide the Commission a list (at the dais) with the guidelines for making
findings.
3. REVIEW OF PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT DISCUSSION FROM
MARCH 2O14 STUDY SESSION.
Discussion
• Director Fagg reviewed the City Council's adopted policy statement regarding the
public benefit requirements for Planned Development Districts. In addition,
handouts and minutes from previous study sessions on the topic were reviewed.
• Commissioner Weremiuk noted that we need to adjust our standards and provide
options. The Commissioner also stated that PDD developments should include a
mixed -use component, and recommended that there be a minimum acreage
threshold for use of the PDD process.
3
Planning Commission Study Session Minutes
November 12, 2014
• Commissioner Roberts suggested that the Sol development was a good example
of providing public benefits, through the provision of an artistic walkway, trees
donated to Ruth Hardy Park, and the incorporation of sustainable features. He
further suggested that there should be a menu of choices in providing amenities
that qualify as a public benefit.
• Commissioner Calerdine recommended that a small -lot ordinance be developed;
he also recommended that public benefits be proportional to the degree of
waivers requested, and questioned if the City would allow any amenities that
aren't accessible to the general public to be included.
• Vice -Chair Klatchko suggested that off -site amenities should be allowed as part
of public benefits and those amenities should be superior to that which is
generally required by code. He discouraged the approach of "buy your way in" in
terms of deviations from code requirements.
• The Commissioners also noted that not every large development should utilize
the PDD process, nor should small-scale projects utilize the PDD process. The
concept of contributing to the completion of Measure J projects was also
discussed as a means to address public benefit requirements.
Direction to Staff:
1. Staff was directed to reconvene the PDD subcommittee (Calerdine, Roberts,
Weremiuk).
2. Staff to develop a small -lot single-family zoning district for use in place of the
PDD process.
3. Revise/expand the public benefit requirements for PDD developments (as a
separate process from the PDD subcommittee).
PLANNING COMMISSION REPORTS, REQUESTS, AND COMMENTS:
• Staff was directed to review the report on historic districts that had been prepared
by Craig Ewing.
ADJOURNMENT: The Planning Commission adjourned at 12:53 pm to 1:30 pm,
Wednesday, November 12, 2014, City Hall, Council Chamber, 3200 East Tahquitz
Canyon Way.
Flinn Fagg, AICP
Director of Planning Services
112