The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2000 - Jan-Dec PC MinutesMOTIONS/DESIGN REVIEW AGENDA AGENDA FOR THE PALM SPRINGS PLANNING COMMISSION January 12, 2000 Council Chambers, City Hall 3200 E. Tahquitz Canyon Way Palm Springs, California 1:30 P.M. ORDER OF ACTION REPORT OF POSTING OF AGENDA. Agenda available for public access at the City Hall exterior bulletin board (west side of Council Chamber) and the Planning Department counter by 5:00 p.m., Friday, January 7, 2000. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: November 24, 1999 PUBLIC COMMENTS: Three minute time limit CONSENT AGENDA/ARCHITECTURAL APPROVAi/MiSCELLANEOUS ITEMS. PUBLIC HEARINGS. Begin at 2:00 p.m. 1. PUBLIC COMMENTS (Three Minute Time Limit). PUBLIC HEARINGS BEGIN AT 2:00 P.M.; PRIOR TO THAT TIME OTHER AGENDA ITEMS WILL BE TAKEN IN ORDER. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 2. TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 28087 -Application by JAMES F. GOLDSTEIN of EL DORADO LIMITED PARTNERSHIP for a Tentative Tract Map to subdivide the existing 377-space El Dorado Mobile Country Club for condominium purposes; property is located on 50.65 acres at 6000 E. Palm Canyon Drive, W-R-MHP and R-MHP Zones, Section 29. Proposed project is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) per Section 15301 (Existing Facilit~es). MOTION, if desired: Continue to meeting of January 26, 2000 at the request of the applicant. It is the intention of the City of Palm Springs to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) in all respects. If, as an attendee or a participant at this meeting, you will need special assistance beyond what is normally provided, the City will attempt to accommodate you in every reasonable manner. Please contact Phil Kaplan, 760/323-8219 at least 48 hours prior to the meeting to inform us of your particular needs and to determine if accommodation is feasible. Please advise us at that time if you will need accommodations to attend or participate in meetings on a regular basis. The telephone number for the hearing impaired (TDD#) is 760/864-9527. If any individual or group challenges the action in court, issues raised may be limited to only those issues raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence at or prior to the Commission meeting Planning Commission Meeting of January 12, 2000 -Page 1 CONSENT AGENDA: None. ARCHITECTURAL APPROVAL: None. MISCELLANEOUS: 3. CASE 5.0788 -DESERT CHAPEL -Final Planned Development District -Review of working drawings for compliance with Planned Development Master Plan approved by Planning Commission on October 20, 1999 4. 5. MOTION, if desired: Approve, subject to conditions. Review of landscaping and lighting improvements at the Pavilion Parking Lot, associ- ated with City Project 98-22 -Discussion CITY-WIDE FLOOD GATES -Update by Engineering Department -Discussion DISCUSSION -Request working with staff to review landscape plans. 6. COMMISSION WORK PROGRAM - 7. 8. Work Program Priorities and Subcommittee Assignments -Update Council Goals and Priorities -5-Year Plan -Update City Council Cabinet Meeting -No update. CITY COUNCIL ACTIONS -Update. COMMISSION/STAFF REPORTS/REQUESTS ADDED STARTERS -If there are added starters, action is required to determine eligibility for consideration. Planning Commission Meeting of January 12, 2000 -Page 2 MOTIONS/DESIGN REVIEW AGENDA AGENDA FOR THE PALM SPRINGS PLANNING COMMISSION January 26, 2000 Council Chambers, City Hall 3200 E. Tahquitz Canyon Way Palm Springs, California 1:30 P.M. ORDER OF ACTION REPORT OF POSTING OF AGENDA. Agenda available for public access at the City Hall exterior bulletin board (west side of Council Chamber) and the Planning Department counter by 5:00 p.m., Friday, January 21, 2000. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: December 8, 1999 PUBLIC COMMENTS: Three minute time limit CONSENT AGENDA/ARCHITECTURAL APPROVAi/MiSCELLANEOUS ITEMS. PUBLIC HEARINGS. Begin at 2:00 p.m. 1. PUBLIC COMMENTS (Three Minute Time Limit). PUBLIC HEARINGS BEGIN AT 2:00 P.M.; PRIOR TO THAT TIME OTHER AGENDA ITEMS WILL BE TAKEN IN ORDER. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 2. CASE 5.0819-CUP -Application by REV. JERRY JOHNSON for a 720-square foot temporary building for social services, to include parking areas and landscaping, located on .5 acres at 190 Oasis Road, M-1 Zone, Section 34. Proposed project is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) per Section 15303(c), construction less than 2500 square feet. MOTION, if desired: Approve, subject to conditions in staff report. Public Hearings Cont'd It is the intention of the City of Palm Springs to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) in all respects. If, as an attendee or a participant atthis meeting, you will need special assistance beyond what is normally provided, the City will attempt to accommodate you ln every reasonable manner. Please contact Phil Kaplan, 760/323-8219 at least 48 hours prior to the meeting to inform us of your particular needs and to determine if accommodation is feasible. Please advise us at that time if you will need accommodations to attend or participate in meetings on a regular basis. The telephone number for the hearing impaired (TDD#) is 760/864-9527. If any individual or group challenges the action in court, issues raised may be limited to only those issues raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence at or prior to the Commission meeting Planning Commission Meeting of January 26, 2000 -Page 1 Public Hearings -Cont'd 3. CASE 5.0820-CUP-Application by PAULA TERIFAJ, D.V.M., to operate a 6160-square foot dog kennel/day care and veterinary facility on a 1.25-acre site at 2050 Executive Drive, M-1-P Zone, Section 6. Proposed project is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) per Section 15301, minor alteration/leasing of an existing facility. MOTION, if desired: Approve, subject to conditions in staff report. 4. CASE 5.0823-CUP -Application by Art Cleary for the PALM SPRINGS TENNIS CLUB located at 701 W. Baristo Road, to install lighting on three tennis courts, R-G-A (8) Zone, Section 15. Proposed project is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) per Section 15301, minor alteration of an existing facility. MOTION, if desired: Approve, subject to conditions in staff report. 5. TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 28087 -Application by JAMES F. GOLDSTEIN of EL DORADO LIMITED PARTNERSHIP for a Tentative Tract Map to subdivide the existing 377-space El Dorado Mobile Country Club for condominium purposes; property is located on 50.65 acres at 6000 E. Palm Canyon Drive, W-R-MHP and R-MHP Zones, Section 29. Continued at the request of applicant from meeting of January 12, 2000. Proposed project is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) per Section 15301 (Existing Facilities). MOTION, if desired: Continue to meeting of February 9, 2000 at the request of applicant. CONSENT AGENDA: ARCHITECTURAL AP PROV AL: 6. CASE 3.1812 -Application by SEAWEST WINDPOWER to construct an office and warehouse on Rupert Street between 19th Avenue and Orr Way, M-2 Zone, Section 15. MOTION, if desired: Approve, subject to conditions. Planning Commission Meeting of January 26, 2000 -Page 2 MISCELLANEOUS: None. 7. COMMISSION WORK PROGRAM - 8. 9. Work Program Priorities and Subcommittee Assignments -Update Council Goals and Priorities -5-Year Plan -Update City Council Cabinet Meeting -No update. CITY COUNCIL ACTIONS -Update. COMMISSION/STAFF REPORTS/REQUESTS ADDED STARTERS -If there are added starters, action is required to determine eligibility for consideration. SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA: 10. CASE 3.1814 -Application by SAN JACINTO HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, Mel Verger, President, for a proposed re-roof of a 3-unit apartment building located at 572 W. Arenas Road, R-2 Zone, Section 15. MOTION, if desired: To be presented. 11. CASE 5.0760 -Application by HARRY BERKOWITZ for a time extension to October 14, 2000 to commence major construction of Belardo Gardens, an assisted living facility located at the northwest corner of Belardo Road and Sunny Dunes Road. MOTION, if desired: Approve extension to October 14, 2000. Planning Commission Meeting of January 26, 2000 -Page 3 MOTIONS/DESIGN REVIEW AGENDA FOR THE PALM SPRINGS PLANNING COMMISSION February 09, 2000 Council Chambers, City Hall 3200 E. Tahquitz Canyon Way Palm Springs, California 1:30 p.m. ORDER OF ACTION REPORT OF POSTING OF AGENDA. Agenda available for public access at the City Hall exterior bulletin board (west side of Council Chamber) and the Planning Department counter by 5:00 p.m., Friday, February 04, 2000. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: December 22, 1999, January 12, 1999. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Three minute time limit CONSENT AGENDA/ARCIIlTECTURAL APPROV AUMISCELLANEOUS ITEMS. PUBLIC HEARINGS: Begin at 2:00 p.m. 1. PUBLIC COMMENTS: (Three minute time limit). Public Hearings begin at 2:00 p.m.; prior to that time other agenda items will be taken in order. 2. PUBLIC HEARINGS: None. 3. CONSENT AGENDA: None. 4. ARCHITECTURAL APPROVAL: None. 5. MISCELLANEOUS: CASE 8.242-An updated sign program by Lamar Palms Associates, LP, for Palm Springs Mall located at 2365 Tahquitz Canyon Way, C-S-C Zone, Section 13. Motion, if desired: Approve subject to conditions in staff report It is the intention of the City of Palm Springs to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) in all respects. It: as an attendee or a participant at this meeting, you will need special assistance beyond what is normally provided, the City will attempt to accommodate you in every reasonable manner. Please contact Phil Kaplan, 760/323-8219 at least 48 hows prior to the meeting to inform us of your particular needs and to determine if accommodation is feasible. Please advise us at that time if you will need accommodations to attend or participate in meetings on a regular basis. The telephone number for the hearing impaired (IDD#) is 760/864-9527. If any individual or group challenges the action in court, issues raised may be limited to only those issues raised at the public hearing described in this notice Or in written correspondence at, or prior to, the Commission meeting Page 1 of 2 Planning Commission Meeting Agenda of February 9, 2000 6. COMMISSION WORK PROGRAM: 7. • Work Program Priorities and Subcommittee Assignments -Update. -Discussion of City lighting field trip. • Council Goals and Priorities -Five Year Plan -Update. • City Council Cabinet Meeting -No Update. CITY COUNCIL ACTIONS: Update. 8. COMMISSION/STAFF REPORTS/REQUESTS: ADDED ST ARTERS: If there are added starters, action is required to determine eligibility for consideration. Page 2of 2 MOTIONS/DESIGN REVIEW AGENDA FOR THE PALM SPRINGS PLANNING COMMISSION February 23, 2000 Council Chambers, City Hall 3200 E. Tahquitz Canyon Way Palm Springs, California 1:30 p.m. ORDER OF ACTION REPORT OF POSTING OF AGENDA . Agenda available for public access at the City Hall exterior bulletin board (west side of Council Chamber) and the Planning Department counter by 5:00 p.m., Friday, February 18, 2000. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: January 26, 1999. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Three minute time limit CONSENT AGENDAf ARCIIlTECTURAL APPROV ALJMISCELLANEOUS ITEMS . PUBLIC HEARINGS: Begin at 2:00 p.m. 1. PUBLIC COMMENTS: (Three minute time limit). Public Hearings begin at 2:00 p.m.; prior to that time other agenda items will be taken in order. 2. PUBLIC HEARINGS: A. Tentative Parcel Map 29450 -Application by Lowe's Home Improvement Warehouse Western Real Estate Division for a proposed two-lot Tentative Parcel Map for the subdivision of approximately 38 acres to initiate the phase one development of a 176,519 square-foot Lowe's Home Improvement Warehouse on 13.33 acres of the project site, located on the south side of Ramon Road, between Gene Autry Trail and San Luis Rey Drive, M-1 Zone, Section 26. Motion, if desired: Recommend approval to the City Council, subject to conditions in staff report; ***** It is the intention of the City of Palm Springs to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) in all respects. If, as an attendee or a participant at this meeting, you will need special assistance beyond what is normally provided, the City will attempt to accommodate you in every reasonable manner. Please contact Phil Kaplan, 760/323-8219 at least 48 hours prior to the meeting to inform us of your particular needs and to determine if accommodation is feasible. Please advise us at that time if you will need accommodations to attend or participate in meetings on a regular basis. The telephone number for the hearing impaired (TDD#) is 760/864-9527. If any individual or group challenges the action in court, issues raised may be limited to only those issues raised at the public hearing described in this notice Or in written correspondence at, or prior to, the Commission meeting Planning Commission Agenda of February 23, 2000 Page I of 3 Associated with this request are: B. Planning Commission Determination 10.425 -Application by Lowe's Home Improvement Warehouse Western Real Estate Division for a determination to add home improvement centers as a permitted use within the M-1 (semce/manufacturing) zone; Motion, if desired: Approve as proposed; and C. Case 3.1795 (Architectural Approval) -Application by Lowe's Home Improvement Warehouse Western Real Estate Division for a proposed 176,519 square-foot home improvement center on 13.33 acres of land located on the south side of Ramon Road, between Gene Autry Trail and San Luis Rey Drive, M-1 Zone, Section 26. Motion, if desired: Approve, subject to conditions in staff report. 5. CONSENT AGENDA: None 6. ARCHITECTURAL APPROVAL: None 7. MISCELLANEOUS: A. Review of current Palm Tree Trimming Policy-Review and recommendation to City Council. 8. COMMISSION WORK PROGRAM: • Work Program Priorities and Subcommittee Assignments -Update. • Council Goals and Priorities -Five Year Plan -Update. • City Council Cabinet Meeting -No Update. • Planning Commission Review and Approval of Annual Work Program -Approve and submit to City Council 9. CITY COUNCIL ACTIONS: Update. Planning Commission Agenda of February 23, 2000 Page 2of 3 .. '. , 10. COMMISSION/STAFF REPORTS/REQUESTS: ADDED ST ARTERS: If there are added starters, action is required to determine eligibility for consideration. Planning Commission Agenda of February 23, 2000 Page 3 of 3 PALM SPRINGS PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA March 22, 2000 Council Chambers, City Hall 3200 E. Tahquitz Canyon Way Palm Springs, California 1:30 p.m. ORDER OF ACTION REPORT OF POSTING OF AGENDA. Agenda available for public access at the City Hall exterior bulletin board (west side of Council Chamber) and the Planning Department counter by 5:00 p.m., Friday, March 17, 2000. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: February 23, 2000. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Three minute time limit CONSENT AGENDA/ARCIDTECTURAL APPROVAL/MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS. PUBLIC HEARINGS: Begin at 2:00 p.m. 1. PUBLIC COMMENTS: (Three minute time limit). Public Hearings begin at 2:00 p.m.; prior to that time other agenda items will be taken in order. 2. PUBLIC HEARINGS: None 3. CONSENT AGENDA: None. ARCIIlTECTURAL APPROVAL: 4. Case 5.0789 (PD 252) Application by Damon Prieto for a Conditional Use Permit to allow a commercial, retail, fast food, gas station, mini-mart, and motel at property located on Ramon Road (Airport Plaza), R-2, M-1 Zones, Section 18. Review of Final Development Plans. Motion, if desired: Approve subject to conditions in staff report. 5. Case 3.910 -Application by Jose Guerrero for an architectural approval to remodel Desert Moon Motel at 2150 N. Palm Canyon Drive, C-1 Zone, Section 3. Motion, if desired: Approve subject to conditions in_ staff report. Planning Commission Agenda Pagel of 3 6. Case 3.1813 -Application by Jesse Huizar for an architectural approval to construct a 30,000 square foot light industrial building at Lot 13, Research Drive. M-1-P Zone, Section 12. Motions, if desired: Approve subject to conditions in staff report. 7. Case 3.1828-Application by Robert Beitz for an architectural approval to remodel existing hotel (Dakota Inn) at 221 Sonora Rd., R-2 Zone, Section 23. Motion, if desired: Approve subject to conditions in staff report; and that the stucco finish be of a hand-troweled smooth finish. 8. Case 3.1759 --Application by OMAG Machine Shop for an addition to an existing automotive repair shop at 333 Del Sol Road, M-1, Section 34. Motion, if desired: Restudy. 9. Case 5.0788 -Application by Desert Chapel for architectural approval of Phase lB of a previously approved 14,000 square foot multi-purpose building at 630 S. Sunrise, W-Rl-C Zone, Section 24. Motion, if desired: Approve subject to conditions in original Master Plan. MISCELLANEOUS: 10. Case 5.0758 Application by Harry Moscatel for a Conditional Use Permit at 476 N. Palm Canyon Drive for a Sports Bar, including live music. Update to Planning Commission regarding live entertainment. 11. Case 3.1826 -Application by Ulrich and Olga Antener for an architectural approval to construct a new single family residence at 2202 Vista Drive, R-1-B Zone, Section 3. Motion, if desired: Approve subject to conditions in staff report. 12. COMMISSION WORK PROGRAM: • Work Program Priorities and Subcommittee Assignments -Update. • Council Goals and Priorities -Five Year Plan -Update. Planning Commission Agenda Page2of 3 • City Council Cabinet Meeting - 13. CITY COUNCIL ACTIONS: Update. 14. COMMISSION/STAFF REPORTS/REQUESTS: ADDED ST ARTERS: If there are added starters, action is required to determine eligibility for consideration. SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA;_ 15. Case 3.1826 -Application by Ulrich and Olga Antener for an architectural approval to construct a new single family residence at 2202 Vista Drive, R-1-B Zone, Section 3. Motion, if desired: Approve subject to conditions in staff report. Planning Commission Agenda Page3of 3 MOTIONS/DESIGN REVIEW AGENDA PALM SPRINGS PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING March 8, 2000 Council Chambers, City Hall 3200 E. Tahquitz Canyon Way Palm Springs, California 1:30 p.m. ORDER OF ACTION REPORT OF POSTING OF AGENDA. Agenda available for public access at the City Hall exterior bulletin board (west side of Council Chamber) and the Planning Department counter by 5:00 p.m., Friday, March 03, 2000. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: February 09, 2000. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Three minute time limit CONSENT AGENDA/ARCIIlTECTURAL APPROV AUMISCELLANEOUS ITEMS. PUBLIC HEARINGS: Begin at 2:00 p.m. 1. PUBLIC COMMENTS: (Three minute time limit). Public Hearings begin at 2:00 p.m.; prior to that time other agenda items will be taken in order. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 2. Case 6.439 -Application by Christine Hammond for a variance to allow the reduction of the side setback and for the construction of a one-car garage 373 South Monte Vista Drive, R-1-A zone, Section 15. Motion, if desired: Approve subject to conditions of approval in staff report. 3. TTM 28087 -Application by James F. Goldstein of El Dorado Limited Partnership for a Tentative Tract Map for a one lot subdivision for condominium purposes at 6000 East Palm Canyon Drive, south of Bolero Road and east of Golf Club Drive, W-RMHP zones, Section 29. Motion, if desired: Approve subject to conditions of approval in staff report. It is the intention of the City of Palm Springs to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) in all respects . u: as an attendee or a participant at this meeting, you will need special assistance beyond what is normally provided, the City will attempt to accommodate you in every reasonable manner. Please contact Phil Kaplan, 760/323-8219 at least 48 hours prior to the meeting to inform us of your particular needs and to determine if accommodation is feasible. Please advise us at that time if you will need accommodations to attend or participate in meetings on a regular basis. The telephone number for the hearing impaired (IDD#) is 760/864-9527. If any individual or group challenges the action in court, issues raised may be limited to only those issues raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence at, or prior to, the Commission meeting. Planning Commission Agenda Page 1 of 2 4. CONSENT AGENDA: None. ARCIIlTECTURAL APPROVAL: 5. Case 3.1832 Application by MFLP I, LLC for an architectural approval to construct broadcast studios and office space additions to the existing administration offices for the Desert Media Group at 1321 Gene Autry Trail, M-1-P Zone, Section 7. Motion, if desired: Approve subject to Conditions of Approval report. 6. Case 3.1759 -Application by OMAG Machine Shop for an addition to an existing automotive repair shop at 333 Del Sol Road, M-1, Section 34. Motion, if desired: Continue to Planning Commission meeting of March 22, 2000. MISCELLANEOUS: 7. Palm Canyon Channel Stage 5 -Proposal of a Flood Control Facility immediately north of Bogert Trail Bridge; Section 35. 8. COMMISSION WORK PROGRAM: • Work Program Priorities and Subcommittee Assignments -Update. • Council Goals and Priorities -Five Year Plan -Update. • City Council Cabinet Meeting - 9. CITY COUNCIL ACTIONS: Update. 10. COMMISSION/STAFF REPORTS/REQUESTS: ADDED STARTERS: If there are added starters, action is required to determine eligibility for consideration. Planning Commission Agenda Pagel of 2 MOTIONS/DESIGN REVIEW AGENDA PALM SPRINGS PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING April 12, 2000 Council Chambers, City Hall 3200 E. Tahquitz Canyon Way Palm Springs, California 1:30 p.m. ORDER OF ACTION REPORT OF POSTING OF AGENDA. Agenda available for public access at the City Hall exterior bulletin board (west side of Council Chamber) and the Planning Department counter by 5:00 p.m., Friday, April 7, 2000. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: March 08, 2000. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Three minute time limit CONSENT AGENDNARClilTECTURAL APPROVAL/MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS. PUBLIC HEARINGS: Begin at 2:00 p.m. 1. PUBLIC COMMENTS: (Three minute time limit). Public Hearings begin at 2:00 p.m.; prior to that time other agenda items will be taken in order. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 2. TTM 28087 -Application by James F. Goldstein of El Dorado Limited Partnership for a Tentative Tract Map for a one lot subdivision for condominium purposes at 6000 East Palm Canyon Drive, south of Bolero Road and east of Golf Club Drive, W-RMHP zones, Section 29. Continued from March 08, 2000. Motion, if desired; Continue to May 10, 2000 Planning Commission meeting. 3. Case 6.440 -Application by Richard and Francessca Harrison for a Variance to allow reduction of side and rear setbacks to allow guest home, trellis carport and storage facility to remain on property at 1062 E. Buena Vista Drive, R-1-C Zone, Section 11. Motion, if desired: Continue to Planning Commission meeting of April 26, 2000. It is the intention of the City of Palm Springs to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) in all respects. If, as an attendee or a participant at this meeting, you will need special assistance beyond what is normally provided, the City will attempt to accommodate you in every reasonable manner. Please contact Phil Kaplan, 760/323-8219 at least 48 hours prior to the meeting to inform us of your particular needs and to determine if accommodation is feasible. Please advise us at that time if you will need accommodations to attend or participate in meetings on a regular basis. The telephone number for the hearing impaired (IDD#) is 760/864-9527. If any individual or group challenges the action in court, issues raised may be limited to only those issues raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence at, or prior to, the Commission meeting. Planning Commission Agenda Pagel of 3 CONSENT AGENDA: 4. 5.0771 Application by Roland Burbank and Melinda Byers for a Conditional Use Permit to allow the construction of a new veterinary hospital at 4299 Ramon Road between Paseo Dorotea and Calle Santa Cruz, P Zone, Section 19. Request for time extension. Motion, if desired: Approve subject to conditions in staff report. ARCHITECTURAL APPROVAL: 5. 5.0789 (PD 252) Application by Damon Prieto for a Conditional Use Permit to allow a commercial, retail, fast food, motel, gas station, and mini-mart at property located on Ramon Road (Airport Plaza), R-2 & M-1 Zones, Section 18. Continued from March 22, 2000 Planning Commission Meeting. Motion, if desired: Approve final development plans, with the exception of the final landscape/irrigation which shall be submitted to the Director of Planning & Building within 30 days of approval of the fmal development plans for review and approval of the Planning Commission. 6. 3.1818 Application by Lance O'Donnell for an architectural approval to remodel existing 8-unit bed and breakfast (Village Manor) at 562 W. Arenas Road, R-2 Zone, Section 15. Motion, if desired: Approve subject to conditions. 7. MISCELLANEOUS: None 8. COMMISSION WORK PROGRAM: • Work Program Priorities and Subcommittee Assignments -Update. • Council Goals and Priorities -Five Year Plan -Update. • City Council Cabinet Meeting - 9. CITY COUNCIL ACTIONS: Update. 10. COMMISSION/STAFF REPORTS/REQUESTS: Planning Commission Agenda Page2 of 3 11. SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA Case 3.1826 -Application by Ulrich and Olga Antener for an architectural approval to construct a new single family residence at 2202 Vista Drive, R-1-B Zone, Section 3. (Continued from March 22, 2000 Agenda.) Motion, if desired: Approve, subject to conditions. ADDED ST ARTERS: If there are added starters, action is required to determine eligibility for consideration. Planning Commission Agenda Page3of 3 PALM SPRINGS PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MOTIONS/DESIGN REVIEW AGENDA May 10,2000 Council Chambers, City Hall 3200 E. Tahquitz Canyon Way Palm Springs, California 1:30 p.m. ORDER OF ACTION REPORT OF POSTING OF AGENDA. Agenda available for public access at the City Hall exterior bulletin board (west side of Council Chamber) and the Planning Department counter by 5:00 p.m., Friday, May 05, 2000. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: April 12, 2000. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Three minute time limit CONSENT AGENDNARCIIlTECTURAL APPROVAL/MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS. PUBLIC HEARINGS: Begin at 2:00 p.m. 1. PUBLIC COMMENTS: (Three minute time limit). Public Hearings begin at 2:00 p.m.; prior to that time other agenda items will be taken in order. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 2. Case 5.0831 (PD 261) and Tentative Tract Map 29659 -Application by Mainiero-Smith and Associates for Dennis Cunningham for a Planned Development District and subdivision map for a seven unit single family residential project on 1.2 acres located a the southwest comer of Camino Real, R-2 Zone, Section 26. Motion, if desired: Continue to the May 24, 2000 Planning Commission meeting. 3. Case 5.0832 (CUP) and Case 6.443 (Variance ) -Applications by UPI, Inc. for a Conditional Use Permit to construct a detached guesthouse with kitchenette in conjunction with a new single family residence and a variance to allow for six ft. high perimeter walls and roof barrel vaults up to a maximum height of 23 ft. on the new residence and 22 ft. in height on the proposed guest house, which exceeds the 18 ft. height limit in the R-1-A Zone at 345 North Via Las Palmas, R-1-A Zone, Section 10. Motion, if desired: Approve subject to conditions in staff report. 4. TTM 28087 -Application by James F. Goldstein of El Dorado Limited Partnership for a Tentative Tract Map for a one lot subdivision for condominium purposes at 6000 East Palm Canyon Drive, south of Bolero Road and east of Golf Club Drive, W-RMHP zones, Section 29. Continued from April 12, 2000. Motion, if desired: Approve subject to conditions in staff report. Planning Commission Motions Agenda/or May 10, 2000 Pagel of 2 5. CONSENT AGENDA: None. ARCIDTECTURAL APPROVAL: 6. Case 3.1868-Application by Hall of Fame Partners, Inc. for the Big Band & Jazz Hall of Fame at 296 South Palm Canyon Drive, C-B-D Zone, Section 15. Motion, if desired: Approve subject to conditions. 7. Case 3.1826 -Application by Ulrich and Olga Antener for an architectural approval to construct a new single family residence at 2202 Vista Drive, R-1-B Zone, Section 3 (Revised plans). Motion, if desired: Motion to be presented. 8. MISCELLANEOUS: None 9. COMMISSION WORK PROGRAM: • Work Program Priorities and Subcommittee Assignments -Update. • Council Goals and Priorities -Five Year Plan -Update. • City Council Cabinet Meeting -Update 10. CITY COUNCIL ACTIONS: Update. 11. COMMISSION/STAFF REPORTS/REQUESTS: ADDED ST ARTERS: If there are added starters, action is required to determine eligibility for consideration. Planning Commission Motions Agenda/or May 10, 2000 Page2of 2 MOTIONS/DESIGN REVIEW AGENDA PALM SPRINGS PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING April 26, 2000 Council Chambers, City Hall 3200 E. Tahquitz Canyon Way Palm Springs, California 1:30 p.m. ORDER OF ACTION REPORT OF POSTING OF AGENDA. Agenda available for public access at the City Hall exterior bulletin board (west side of Council Chamber) and the Planning Deparbnent counter by 5:00 p.m., Friday, April 21 2000. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: March 22, 2000. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Three minute time limit CONSENT AGENDA/ARCIIlTECTURAL APPROV AUMISCELLANEOUS ITEMS. PUBLIC HEARINGS: Begin at 2:00 p.m. 1. PUBLIC COMMENTS: {Three minute time limit). Public Hearings begin at 2:00 p.m.; prior to that time other agenda items will be taken in order. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 2. Case 5.0837 -Application by David Christian for a Conditional Use Permit to construct a guest house with kitchen at 691 Santa Rosa, R-1-A Zone, Section 15. Motion, if desired: Approve subject to conditions. 3. Case 6.440 -Application by Richard and Francessca Harrison for a Variance to allow reduction of side and rear setbacks to allow guest home, trellis carport and storage facility to remain on property at 1062 E. Buena Vista Drive, R-1-C Zone, Section 11. Continued from April 12, 2000. Motion, if desired: Approve subject to conditions. Planning Commission Agenda Pagel of 2 4. TTM 29691-PD260: Application by Palm Springs New Millennium (Star Canyon Villas) for a Tentative Tract Map to subdivide 11.41 acres into 9 lots for a resort development at South Palm Canyon Dr. between Sunny Dunes Road to the north, Mesquite Avenue to the south, Random Road to the east and South Belardo Road to the west, W-C-1 and W-R-3 Zones, Sections 22/23. Motion, if desired: See attached report. 5. CONSENT AGENDA: None. ARCIIlTECTURAL APPROVAL: 6. Case 3.1836 -Application by David Christian for Architectural Approval to construct a single family dwelling on hillside property at 691 Santa Rosa, R-1-A Zone, Section 15. Motion, if desired: Approve subject to conditions. 7. MISCELLANEOUS: None 8. COMMISSION WORK PROGRAM: • Work Program Priorities and Subcommittee Assignments -Update. • Council Goals and Priorities -Five Year Plan -Update. • City Council Cabinet Meeting -Update 9. CITY COUNCIL ACTIONS: Update. 10. COMMISSION/STAFF REPORTS/REQUESTS: ADDED STARTERS: If there are added starters, action is required to determine eligibility for consideration. Planning Commission Agenda Page2of 2 PALM SPRINGS PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MOTIONS/DESIGN REVIEW AGENDA May 24, 2000 Council Chambers, City Hall 3200 E. Tahquitz Canyon Way Palm Springs, California 1:30 p.m. ORDER OF ACTION: REPORT OF POSTING OF AGENDA. Agenda available for public access at the City Hall exterior bulletin board (west side of Council Chamber) and the Planning Department counter by 5:00 p.m., Friday, May 19, 2000. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: April 26, 2000. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Three minute time limit CONSENT AGENDA/ARCHITECTURAL APPROVALJMISCELLANEOUS ITEMS. PUBLIC HEARINGS: Begin at 2:00 p.m. 1. PUBLIC COMMENTS: (Three minute time limit). Public Hearings begin at 2:00 p.m.; prior to that time other agenda items will be taken in order. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 2. Case 5.0831 (PD 261) and Tentative Tract Map 29659 -Application by Mainiero, Smith, & Associates for Dennis Cunningham/Electric Avenue, LLC for a Planned Development District and subdivision map for a seven-unit single family, residential project on 1.2 acres located at the southwest corner of Camino Real, R-2 Zone, Section 26. Motion, if desired: Approve, subject to conditions in staff report. 3. 5.0827 (PD 259) and TTM 29638 -Application by Lundin Development Co. for a Preliminary Planned Development District for a proposed integrated, single- phased shopping center consisting of a 57,541 square foot supennarket, a 14,883 square foot drug store with drive-through phannacy, two quick-service restaurant pads consisting of 3,589 and 3,000 square feet, respectively, various retail shop space consisting of 25,353 square feet and an automotive refueling station with drive-through car wash and the subdivision of the 9.9 gross acre/8.29 net acre site into nine (9) parcels, ranging in size from 0.13 acres to 2.82 acres, located at the northwest comer of Ramon Road and Sunrise Way, C-1 Zone, Section 14. Motion, if desired: Approve, subject to conditions in staff report and the following: A. The car wash building shall be relocated to provide more open space adjacent to the main Sunrise entrance and shall be reoriented and/or screened to not allow visibility directly into the building; B. The site plan indicating a proposed reduction in parking is not approved at this time. The May 24, 2000 Planning Commission Motions Agenda Page 1 of 6 C. D. E. F. G. 4. final site plan shall be revised to meet applicable building area to parking space ratio requirements pursuant to Section 9306.00 of the Zoning Ordinance or, if the developer continues to contemplate a parking reduction, the final site, landscape and irrigation plans shall incorporate additional design elements that will serve to enhance the pedestrian and alternative transportation component, with additional pedestrian "nodes", a more enhanced internal pedestrian circulation system with special paving and additional landscaped areas in said pedestrian areas and lining the pedestrian circulation system. The vehicular circulation to access the drive-through lane for the Sav-On Drug Store shall be redesigned, to the satisfaction of the Directo~ of Planning and Building. The trash enclosures shall be relocated to not be as visible from the Ramon Road and Sunrise Way, to the satisfaction of the Director of Planning and Building. The required landscaped planter, with additional landscaping as discussed in Planning Division Condition No. 45, shall be relocated to the east side of the drive aisle, adjacent to the west side (rear elevation) of the supermarket building. The required landscaping as specified in Planning Division Condition No. 45 shall be indicated on the Final Landscape Plan and shall be subject to review and approval of the Planning Commission in conjunction with the Final Development Plans for the project. Engineering Condition No. 9 shall be revised to require the construction of a 180 foot long by 1 O foot wide bus tum out as specified. Engineering Condition No. 15 shall be revised to eliminate the final sentence from the condition. Case 5.0839-CUP -Application by James Reid/Allen Sanborn for a Conditional Use Permit to allow the construction of a guest house at 423 W. Merito Place, R-1- A Zone, Section 10. Motion, if desired: Approve, subject to conditions in staff report. 5. TPM 29697 -Application by Mainiero, Smith, & Associates for John Burke-White Brothers Investment Co. for a Tentative Parcel Map to subdivide five acres into two parcels on the southwest corner of Sunrise Way and Vista Chino Road, P Zone, Section 11. Motion, if desired: Approve subject to conditions in staff report. 6. Case 6.441 -Application by Diane D. Stone for a Variance to allow reduction of setbacks for the extension of an open-front patio at 271 W. Lilliana Drive, R-1-B Zone, Section 27. Motion, if desired: Approve subject to conditions in staff report. May 24, 2000 Planning Commission Motions Agenda Page 2 of 6 7. CONSENT AGENDA: None. ARCHITECTURAL APPROVAL: 8. Case 3.1860 -Application by Best Signs Inc. (Jesse Cross) for an architectural approval to construct an office/manufacturing building at 1550 S. Gene Autry Trail, M-1 Zone, Section 19. Motion, if desired: Approve, subject to conditions. 9. Case 5.0789 (PD 252) -Final landscape and irrigation plans for Phase I of Airport Plaza, located on the north side of Ramon Road between Avenida Evelita and the Pueblo Sands Condominiums, Section 18. Motion, if desired: Approve, subject to the following conditions: A B. C. D. E. F. G. H. 10. The proposed Palo Verde tree species shall be a minimum size of 24" box. All proposed shrubs shall be a minimum size of 5 gallon. All Palm heights shall be specified on the landscape plan and shall be approved by the Director of Planning and Building prior to final approval of the landscape plan. An alternative groundcover, such as Desert Gold or Sunset decomposed granite, shall be used. A sample of said material shall be submitted for review and approval of the Director of Planning and Building prior to installation. Areas of rock cobble in the desert scape areas shall also be considered. "Trax" edging shall be used in areas where a polyurethane edging was proposed. Additional shrub massing shall be provided in the landscape planters adjacent to the building, to the satisfaction of the Director of Planning and Building. Berming shall be provided in all streetside landscape areas, as depicted on the final grading plans, and implemented to the satisfaction of the Director of Planning and Building. All turf areas shall consist of sod. Case 3.1861 -Application by Paul Bruggemans for an architectural approval to construct a new single family residence at 1868 Vista Drive, R-1-A Zone, Section 3. Motion, if desired: Remove from agenda as per applicant request May 24, 2000 Planning Commission Motions Agenda Page 3 of 6 11. Case 3.1795 -Application by Lowe's Home Improvement Warehouse Western Real Estate Division for review of final landscape and irrigation plans for project located on the south side of Ramon Road, between Gene Autry Trail and San Luis Rey Drive, M-1 Zone, Section 26. Motion, if desired: Approve, subject to the following conditions: A. An "under story" tree, such as the Acacia species specified on the plant palette, shall be used along the west side of the building, adjacent to the Garden Center. B. Additional landscape pockets for shrub planting shall be provided along the north side of the building, to the satisfaction of the Director of Planning and Building. C. Additional Acacia trees from the proposed landscape palette shall be provided in lieu of the Palo Verde species along the San Luis Rey Drive and Camino Parocela street frontages. D. An additional vine material, such as a bougainvillea species, shall be used to provide variety and color where vines are proposed against screen walls. E. A thick evergreen shrub hedge, such as the Carolina Cherry or Xylosma species, shall be provided at the base of the 6-foot tall perimeter screen walls along San Luis Rey Drive and Camino Parocela. F. Shrub massing shall be provided in the area between the columns for the lumber pick up canopy overhang. G. An alternative groundcover, such as Desert Gold or Sunset decomposed granite, shall be used. A sample of said material shall be submitted for review and approval of the Director of Planning and Building prior to installation. Areas of rock cobble in the desert scape areas shall also be considered. H. The proposed Mesquite tree species shall be specified as a thornless variety. I. The size of specimen trees shall be increased in key areas to a minimum of 36 inch box. The final location of the larger specimen trees shall be determined by the Director of Planning and Building prior to final approval of the final landscape plan. J. The proposed density of shrubs and ground covers may be reduced, to the satisfaction of the Director of Planning and Building. However, the minimum size of all shrubs shall be increased to a minimum 5 gallon size. K. The landscape statement at the easternmost driveway on Ramon Road shall be strengthened by using Date Palms in lieu of the proposed Acacia species, similar to other vehicular entrances to the site. L. The location of the Mesquite trees and Date Palms shall be switched along the east side of the building, to the satisfaction of the Director of Planning and Building. M. The proposed split face block wall material shall be two-sided, with exposed split face on both sides of the block. May 24, 2000 Planning Commission Motions Agenda Page4 of 6 N. 12. The detail for the emitter box shall be revised to the satisfaction of the Director of Planning and Building. Case 3.1856 -Application by Rivera & Swartz for Roger Seltzer for an architectural approval to construct a new single family residence at 395 Bogert Trail, R-1-B Zone, Section 35. Motion, if desired: Approve, subject to conditions in staff report. 13. Case 5.0805 (PD 255) -Application by Garden Springs Apartments by CBM Group, Inc. for Final Development Plans for a Planned Development District for a 60-unit low and moderate income residential apartment project on a 3.63-acre parcel located at the southeast corner of Indian Canyon Drive and San Rafael Drive, R-2 Zone, Section 2. Motion, if desired: Approve, subject to the original conditions of approval for PD 255 and the following conditions: A. B. C. D. E. F. G. 14. The exterior lighting photometric plan and proposed catalog cuts for wall-mounted lighting and carport lighting are not approved at this time. The final details of these light sources shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Planning and Building prior to the issuance of building permits. The final design of the southern entry of the project on Simms Road shall be revised pursuant to the architects facsimile submittal of May 19, 2000. An additional landscape finger shall be provided in the row of parking along the east property line to comply with Section 9306.00 of the Zoning Ordinance, to the satisfaction of the Director of Planning and Building. Shrub massing shall be provided in said landscape finger to minimize view blockage for adjacent single family residents. The final color of the proposed wrought iron fence shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Planning and Building prior to the issuance of building. The location and design of the proposed bus shelter is approved subject to consideration by Sun Line transit and review and approval of the Director of Planning and Building. The mounding around the perimeter of all on-site retention areas shall be undulating and natural in appearance, to the satisfaction of the Director of Planning and Building. The Landscape and Irrigation plan shall be reviewed for comment by the Design Review Committee with a final, revised version of the plan reviewed and approved by the Director of Planning and Building prior to the issuance of building permits. MISCELLANEOUS: None. May 24, 2000 Planning Commission Motions Agenda Page5 of 6 15. COMMISSION WORK PROGRAM: • Work Program Priorities and Subcommittee Assignments -Update. • Council Goals and Priorities -Five Year Plan -Update. • City Council Cabinet Meeting -Update. 16. CITY COUNCIL ACTIONS: Update. 17. COMMISSION/STAFF REPORTS/REQUESTS: ADDED STARTERS: If there are added starters, action is required to determine eligibility for consideration. May 24, 2000 Planning Commission Motions Agenda Page 6 of 6 PALM SPRINGS PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MOTIONS AGENDA June 14, 2000 Council Chambers, City Hall 3200 E. Tahquitz Canyon Way Palm Springs, California 1:30 p.m. ORDER OF ACTION: REPORT OF POSTING OF AGENDA. Agenda available for public access at the City Hall exterior bulletin board (west side of Council Chamber) and the Planning Department counter by 5:00 p.m., Friday, June 09, 2000. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: May 10, 2000. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Three minute time limit. CONSENT AGENDA/ARCHITECTURAL APPROVAL/MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS. PUBLIC HEARINGS: Begin at 2:00 p.m. 1. PUBLIC COMMENTS: (Three minute time limit). Public Hearings begin at 2:00 p.m.; prior to that time other agenda items will be taken in order. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 2. TPM 29697 -Application by Mainiero, Smith, & Associates for John Burke -White Brothers Investment Co. for a Tentative Parcel Map to subdivide five acres into two parcels on the southwest comer of Sunrise Way and Vista Chino Road, P Zone, Section 11. Continued from the May 24, 2000 Planning Commission meeting. Motion, if desired: Continue to Planning Commission meeting of July 12, 2000. 3. 5.0827 (PD 259) and TTM 29638 -Application by Lundin Development Co. for a Preliminary Planned Development District for a proposed integrated, single-phased shopping center consisting of a 57,541 square foot supennarket, a 14,883 square foot drug store with drive-through phannacy, two quick-service restaurant pads consisting of 3,589 and 3,000 square feet, respectively, various retail shop space consisting of 25,353 square feet and an automotive refueling station with drive-through car wash and the subdivision of the 9.9 gross acre/8.29 net acre site into nine (9) parcels, ranging in size from 0.13 acres to 2.82 acres, located at the northwest comer of Ramon Road and Sunrise Way, C-1 Zone, Section 14. Continued from the May 24, 2000 Planning Commission meeting. Motion, if desired: To be presented. June 1~, 2000 Planning Commission Agenda Page 1 of 3 4. Case 6.442 and TTM 29658 -Application by Mainiero Smith & Associates for Dennis Cunningham to subdivide parcel into two lots with two single-family residences at 1304 Camino Primrose, R-2 Zone, Section 23. Motion, if desired: Approve subject to conditions in staff report. CONSENT AGENDA: 5. DETERMINATION -General Plan consistency detennination for the proposed right-of- way vacation of a portion of the public street called Paseo de Anza. Motion, if desired: Approve. 6. DISCUSSION: Adjourned meeting June 21, 2000 or July 05, 2000. ARCHITECTURAL APPROVAL: 7. Case 3.1865 -Application by Bob Slettedahl for an architectural approval to erect an 80'x140' metal building directly behind the Lumbennen's Building at 3455 North Indian Canyon Drive, C-1, C-M, CM-CG, & M-15 Zones, Section 34. Motion, if desired: Approve subject to conditions. 8. MISCELLANEOUS: None. SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA: 9. Case 3475-C -Application by Klein Building and Development for Million Air Palm Springs for a new aircraft hangar location at 145 Gene Autry Trail, A Zone, Section 18. Motion, if desired: Approve subject to conditions. 10. COMMISSION WORK PROGRAM: • Work Program Priorities and Subcommittee Assignments -Update. • Council Goals and Priorities -Five Year Plan -Update. • City Council Cabinet Meeting -Update. 11. CITY COUNCIL ACTIONS: Update. June 14, 2000 Planning Commission Agenda Page2of 3 12. COMMISSION/STAFF REPORTS/REQUESTS: • Cahuilla School light update • Palm Springs Mall lighting update ADDED STARTERS: If there are added starters, action is required to determine eligibility for consideration. · June 14, 2000 Planning Commission Agenda Page3 of 3 MOTIONS AGENDA FOR ADJOURNED MEETING OF THE PALM SPRINGS PLANNING COMMISSION July 05, 2000 Studio "8", City Hall 3200 E. Tahquitz Canyon Way Palm Springs, California 2:00 p.m. ORDER OF ACTION: REPORT OF POSTING OF AGENDA. Agenda available for public access at the City Hall exterior bulletin board {west side of Council Chamber) and the Planning Department counter by 5:00 p.m., Friday, June 30, 2000. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: May 24, 2000. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Three minute time limit. CONSENT AGENDA/ARCHITECTURAL APPROVALJMISCELLANEOUS ITEMS. PUBLIC HEARINGS: Begin at 2:00 p.m. 1. PUBLIC COMMENTS: (Three minute time limit). PUBLIC HEARINGS: (Continued from the June 14, 2000 Planning Commission meeting) 2. 5.0827 (PD 259) and TTM 29638 -Application by Lundin Development Co. for a Preliminary Planned Development District for a proposed integrated, single-phased shopping center consisting of a 57,541 square foot supermarket, a 14,883 square foot drug store with drive-through pharmacy, two quick-service restaurant pads consisting of 3,589 and 3,000 square feet, respectively, various retail shop space consisting of 25,353 square feet and an automotive refueling station with drive-through car wash and the subdivision of the 9.9 gross acre/8.29 net acre site into nine (9) parcels, ranging in size from 0.13 acres to 2.82 acres, located at the northwest comer of Ramon Road and Sunrise Way, C-1 Zone, Section 14. · Motion to be presented. CONSENT AGENDA: 3. Case 3.1892 -Application by the Palm Springs Historical Society to construct a courtyard adjacent to the Mccallum Adobe at 221 South Palm Canyon Drive. Motion, if desired: Approve subject to conditions. 4. Case 3.1875-Application by Urrutia Architects for an architectural approval to construct an office/industrial building on Gene Autry Trail between Tachevah Drive, Bird Center Drive, and Gene Autry Trail, M-1-P Zone, Section 7. Motion, if desired: Approve subject to conditions. July 05, 2000 Planning Commission Agenda Page 1 of 2 MISCELLANEOUS: 5. DISCUSSION -Request by Joe Bundura, CEO EagleRider -Palm Springs, to allow motorcycle rental in the C-1 Zoning District 6. COMMISSION WORK PROGRAM: • Work Program Priorities and Subcommittee Assignments -Update. • Council Goals and Priorities -Five Year Plan -Update. • City Council Cabinet Meeting -Update. 7. CITY COUNCIL ACTIONS: Update. 8. COMMISSION/STAFF REPORTS/REQUESTS: ADDED STARTERS: If there are added starters, action is required to determine eligibility for consideration. July 05, 2000 Planning Commission Agenda Page2of 2 ,; Planning Commission Minutes · Ju1y·12, 2000 · .. · · ·· · · · · · · P~ga2 of 8 ' . Chairman MIiis ope~ed = the ~eating f.or Public Comments .... ' · ... Mr. Greg Bever, Lundin D.evelopment. addressetQ t~e Planning Commissioners to tt1ank them for ariy possible conslderatlo~ at a ·tuture P~anning Commission _meeting. . : :·. · · . · There being nQ furt~er appearances, Public CommenJs \IV&S closed. . . . . . . . . . . _.. ·. •, -: . : . . . . . ~ . . . '• . :·. . . . . . . . . . . : . . .. . . ****"' ~ . . ; . . . CONSENT AGENDA: , .· . · Case 6.0779 (CUP) and 6.423 (Variance) -Application for a one-year time ·extension· by ·,e.weat Wlndpower for ~n approved Wind· Energy Coa,version·System (WECS)-proJ•ct on the. •~~th,slde·of~~rnet Road · and ~est'.of lridlan A~enue, E-1 Zone,·.S~tion.16. :.: · :... . · Principal Planner · Hayes reported that this application was originally approved by the Planning Commission · on ~uly 22, 1998. This request is for a one year time extension to July 22, · 200.1. He repo~ed ·that the height of the win.ct turbine generators · is prop()sed to ·be 233':(gro.und to top af - rotor).-. Planner reported ·that other· wind turbines -in the area are Lip to 296' and that there is a ~ntemplated Ordinance .change in process to increase the maximum allowable height to 300'. Planner reviewed exhibits. ~lch include · proposed ·staging area and . extension ·ot. existing substation .. He reported tt:,aUhe appllcation··is·cons~stent with tt1e spirit and ·Intent of.the·:wecs . Ordinance· and that' there has been.-no sig·nificarit Qhaoge ·-to the_. Zorii.ng· Ordinai)ce :tram. the time. · . of Qriginal approva~. . _. · · ·-· · ......... · · · · ·' · .. · · · - . -M/S/C .(Klatchko/Matthews) 7-0, to approve subject to orlglnal conditions In staff report. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ·, . :, : .... ' . . ; .. ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... ·, . . :• .. .: . . . . .. · ....... :~-. . . ·. . . . . : ~ ~ . . . .. . ~ .• ** •• Caae 8.0741 --Appllcatlon for time extenalon by Stanley Broxmeyer for a Plan.ned · Qevelopment-District to allow ·con1tructlon ·of· one 611 1p11c• ~V ·resott · and aa 8,()oO· a.f, · alngle .,-mHy Iota at the .northW-eat corr1er of Cam~iy and Nortb Paltri ·canyon Dt1ve, R-1.C .· ~-~"~' •~~~:,n ~-•~·. . . . .. _ : ... ,, .. :_ ... : .· : .. 9.ommlasloners Ray and MIiis ~bs~f!iined due to a conflict ~f lntere~t. Principal Planner tfayes reporte~ that this Is the second one year time extension request for this · -ppllcatlon.· He reported that· there· have. been no relevant changes. In the ·Zoning Ordinance-or·the General Plan that ~nfti«wlth this request. : He reque~ted approval of extension to May-21·, 2001. - ·_.· .·:._. .-:-t . • •• :··.·=.· .......... · ... · ·~·. ·: .. -~ ;: ~.·· · ....... ·· ... ··:-. ·.-_ · .. · .. ··.· :·· .. _.· :· :: ·_.;._ .. _ .. ~: .. . . . . M/S/C (M•tth•~slca"8.-y) s~ .. 2 ~~~~In to ~ppro~• subJ~~t to cQn~.ltl~n• In staff.re~~ . . ·.·· ... : .. · ... ·. ,•;: ... · .. · : .. : .. :--· : ... ·_. >':· .·.--·----:.·· · .. ·. '' :: · ..... · ..... _.--:· '. <. ·.' .. ·.·: ·: .·:. · .. _ :·:····.·· .. ··. ··.· . .. . ·. *·*"' * 'i'. :'. ,. .. : ,• .. _.·······-.\ i l \. , ..... _ .... Planning Commission Minutes · July· 12, 2()0(j . . ·. Page4pf a . . : .... · .. Case 6.444 (3.1201 )-Application by Steadfast Properties/Ken Pruett for a. variance to allow reduction In setb~ck~ ~ accommodate additional carports and architectural approval ·f~r remodel at Pacific Palm• Aparbnents·at 423 South·EI Segund~, R~•Zone," Section· 14. . ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . •. : ·. . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . : . ·. . . . ·• '". . .. . . . . . .. . . .. _": ' . . . . . . Commissioner Klatchko abstained due to a conflict of interest. . . ·. . . : . Associate Planner Dawson reviewed this application for the Planning Commission .. He explained that the variance request is for the positioning of .the posts for these. 40 ·carports ·at 9'· 6" frcinithe property line. He reported that the ~pplicanfre.move~ the ·bay.-parking from its application as per :statrs· recommend~tions. · He ·reported that~ although posf positioning was ·studied for the. carports·,. ti.lming· radius issued .. made the varian~ request·necessary. He· stated ttiat rio photometrics are required for tl:,is application. He flirther reported that all neighboring property owners had been · no,ified of this public.hearing and that sta~ had not re.ceived ariy· phone calls or letters from those . notified .. Planner reported .that,· due t~ the sensitivity of the positioning of the· ·carports at .the rear . yard set~aek, sta~ is ~ecornrnending. d.eniar of th~ applicatio.n. . .. . , Ch~irman ~ills opened the Public Hearing. Mr. Ken ~eelistra, representing applicant addressed the Planning Coa:nmission. He reported that his company has performed a high quality upgrade of a deteriorated property and transformed it · into nice apartments·. He stated that he did not want to disco~rage investors willing to do this type of work in· the City.: ·:He further stated that the health ·and ·s·afety ·of resident$. ·is. at i~slie concerning ~ve·rect parking·:· He ·teported that n~·objections had beel'.1 regist~red from any adjace11t prop~fty ') owners: He stated tllat tt,e ·parldng··.~paces· ·aiready· exist;. therefore,-·:th~ pl~r:Js reflect tbe )nost logical" pla.~menfof'~he catpgrts:·: ·Heals~. referenced ·the ·~~ne"fa~ ~~an ~~cf~s .goar° for· ~ye~ed .. parking~·-· . . . -.. ' . . . .. . . .. . . : . . . . : . . .. .... . ... :-... :··.:. . . ' ... · .. ·. Mr. Ken Pruett, Steadfast Properties, addressed the Planning Commission. He stated that his company had done a first class job ·on rehabilitating this property~ ·He stated tt:tat the· original .plan · was to have 139 parking· spaces and ·that his company·has con·~ecfto reduce t~atnum~er t~· 40 ~rports and h~ feels that the carports·would be an··eohancemenfto the .Pr:operty. . .. . !here ~ing· no fu~tier ~ppearan~s, the Publi~ He~d~g was clos~.~ . . . . . Principal Planner Hayes explained that the neighboring apartment, (The Bianitz) may wist, t9 do ·. essenti,;ally ·the same thing with their parking configuration if this is approved. . · . Commissioner Raya express~ his concern l"egarding the f!10unted d.etail of ~e. lighti~g fixtures arid req·uested an ·overall" photoineiric study.·. He··also 'requested altematives·to tlie· strip lights~·. ·tte . Qsked that high ·pressure .so.dium· lighting be used ·in t~e_.c~rJX?l'.tS rathe~ than ·11~urescent lights. C.on,missioner Ju~asky state.d that he felt the application was for a good project and wo~ld give a _. ¢Qhesive· took with ·other ·properties. Com~jssio.ners --caff~l)'·a.~d Matthews agreed that this would ·· .. ~·-beri~~dalproject.· ... ' .. · . .-.. :· ·.·.··· .... ·:· .. ·· ... ·'.· .... :: .. :·. ·.·:·:.• .• .. ·: .:· :·.· · .. ···:· '··:··.·.·.· ., .· .·. (·-~1 \ i ( Pl~nning Commission Minutes July 12, 2000 · · .· P~g~6of 8 will be . an aclive· planter with drainage on tl)e· f9of. The Planning Commission had several questions regarding the exhibi~s and plans whictl were unan~wered •nd; therefore, recommended that ·the··application.'be··tal;>led until th~ nexfrrieeting ... ·. ·. · .. ·: : ... ·. ·:. · .. : · . : · . · · .·· .· :· ... M/S~C (Matth~ay~) .7~, to continue review ~o the July 26, 20~0 -Plannlng Comrnlss.ion meeting.·.. . . . . . ',• .. . . . ... ·. ·· .. ·.··. ·.· ·.. . . . . . ',. ..' · .... : ... ·. ***** Case 3.0895 -Application by Wassmann Developa:nent for an architectural approval to l'.'~~odel a restaurant (fo~•l'.IY Louise's .~antrr, proposed tc>' be ·Kalura TrattorJ.;,) at 124 South Palm Canyon ·il'rlve, CBD Zone,"·Sectlon 1·s.. ·. . · .. . .. · : .. :· · :. . · .·. . : . -. . Principal Planner Sullivan feviewed the application and exhibits for the Planning Commi~sion for · this Class 1 Historical Site (which is a part of the downtown Plaza). She reported that the Historic Site Preservation Board had. made_ several recommendations to the applicant regarding colors, window treatments~ archi.tectural ~lements, and roof materials and that the -applicant has been ag·reeable 'to these recommendations. ··she stated that ·the plans displayed represent most of .the changes and she described the further moqifi~ations propos.~d i~ keeping with the ~ 930's style. She further reported that the ~pplic~nt Will: cootdil~1at~ ·-with. th~ Fir~-Department: regarding the alitom·~tic fire sprinkler referen~d in that de_partment'~ condition of approval ~o~5. Regarding the proposed window treatments, Downtown Development Director reported that other .. ~usinesses within the Plaza have. solid green awliir1gs, with .the exception of ttie beaµty -parlor w_hich has·a retractable striped awning.··. He also stated that this is a·small ·restaurantwhich ne.eds · th, outdoor dining area which will have a lig~eightfence ~ohan.ciog tt:,e courtyard.-He ·stated that this propos_eci projecf wili improve the City, similar to how ·thEi .Fishenn·an's Mark~t ini'prov~ that section ofthe C~y. . . . . . .. . . . . . · . .. · . .· ·= · · . · . . . Mr. Don Long, applicant representative, addressed the Planning Commission to state that all · "°li~toric Site Preservation Board conditions wiU be inco~rated into the renovation plans. He . . . furtt,er described ·.the wheelchair accessible ramp modifications as shown on the plans and as supported by the Fire Depilrtment~ He furt~er explained tnat the Sta~e DepartiJ'.lent o, ~~oholic .. ·'3everage Control requires clear delineation with fencing · fqr serving liquor in an outdoor se·ating ·. area: He also explafned: that the Development Agreement for the Plaza Mercado ·trom the -City · tatates that no increase in parking is required for this use~ Planning Commissioners were concerned with changing the entrance, and the vi~w of, the P_laza Theater -which is -a ·unique, wel~-recognized, a,nd "picture po$tcard" historical landmark in Palm Springs. .The Planning Commission requested the ·applicant to supply a color rendering of the ·enti~ site (inclusive of other build_ir:1gs) for their review. Als~ of concel"1 was the vi~~ of tJle ~ba~ of the bouse;t~-Qperations (e.g·. di~h bus~irig statio·nl of the r~stauta·nt from ·the Pl.aza Theater .~t~P$. ~~i~ iS. ltria~p~a~ie'tQt~e ~l?~n_1rig·~~~~-is_si~n~~-~-,9ve~.1~·! tr,~ ~lar1rinsf9:-~~-'!.l!~•~~ -~q~.i~~ ,nQre·.detail in,or~ettc>'-~onsid~(-the,~pplieatior.rft.Jrlh~L. · · _· _-. _'. · · . ·· .... · .-. · ·,. : _ _.·. : .. · .. · · · •• • • • •• • • • • • •' • _. • • • :· • • • •• • • •,: • .• • ~ • • • '> • • • ~ •••• • • ·.... • • • • • • • . -.. CITY OF PALM SPRINGS PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING September 13, 2000, 1 :30 p.m. Council Chambers, City Hall 3200 E. Tahquitz Canyon Way Palm Springs, CA 92262 ROLL CALL Present Present This Meeting Chris Mills, Chr. X Jeffrey Jurasky, V.Chr. X Ralph Raya X Jon Shoenberger X Philip Klatchko X Jon Caffery Mark Matthews X STAFF PRESENT Doug Evans, Director of Planning & Building Steve Hayes, Principal Planner Hope Sullivan, Principal Planner Marcus Fuller, Associate Civil Engineer Michele Rambo, Assistant Planner Kimberly Chafin, Assistant Planner Monet Padget, Planning Technician To Date 6 6 5 6 5 5 5 Michele Boyd, Planning Administrative Coordinator ***** Chairman Mills called the meeting to order at 1 :40 p.m. ***** FY 00-01 Excused Absences To Date 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 REPORT OF POSTING OF AGENDA: The September 13, 2000 agenda was available for public access at the City Hall exterior bulletin board and the Department of Planning & Building counter by 4:00 p.m., Friday, September 08, 2000. ***** APPROVAL OF MINUTES: M/S/C (Shoenberger/Klatchko 5-0, 2 absent) to approve minutes of August 09, 2000 as presented. ***** Page 2 of 12 Planning Commission Minutes September 13, 2000 Director introduced two new Planning Division employees -Kimberly Chafin, Assistant Planner, and Monet Padget, Planning Technician. * * * * * Chairman Mills opened the Public Comments. There being no appearances, Public Comments was closed. ***** Case 3.1912 -Application by Sobhy G. Yousef for an architectural approval for alterations at 2796 North Palm Canyon Drive, R-G-A/C-1 Zone, Section 3. Continued from the August 23, 2000 Planning Commission meeting. Principal Planner Sullivan reviewed exhibits and reported that at the August 23, 2000 Planning Commission meeting, the direction for restudy was for the applicant to work on design options that would protect the design of the existing canopy. She explained that the corporate international identity for the proposed gasoline company is a ten foot tall sign which would require an application for a variance, as eight feet is the maximum allowed per ordinance. She also stated that the "Food Mart" sign represented on the exhibits is not under consideration by the Planning Commission at today's meeting. She asked that, if the Planning Commission does not approve today's application, that direction be given for a future application. Mr. Sobhy Yousef addressed the Planning Commission to state that he must use a distributor to purchase gasoline and can not buy it directly. He urged the Planning Commission to take action today on his application. . M/S/C (Jurasky/Raya 6-0, 1 absent) to deny proposed architectural improvements. Direction given for any future re-application include: The existing canopy should retain its original appearance, landscaping should be represented in final plans, and any corporate signs exceeding the eight foot height limitation must be considered under a variance application. ***** Case 3.1926 -Application by Mr. G's for Toys for a minor architectural approval for facade improvements at 180 North Palm Canyon Drive, CBD Zone, Section 15. Director reported that the applicant has requested that this item be removed from the agenda. Page 3 of 12 Planning Commission Minutes September 13, 2000 M/S/C (Matthews/Klatchko 6-0, 1 absent) to remove from agenda per applicant's request. ***** Sign Application -Application by Sign-a-Rama for a new monument sign for Howard Johnson Resort and Denny's restaurant located at 701 East Palm Canyon Drive, R-3 Zone, Section 26. M/S/C (Matthews/Jurasky 6-0, 1 absent) to remove from agenda as per applicant's request. ***** PUBLIC HEARINGS: Case 5.0757 (Change of Zone from 0-20 to R-1-A) and TTM 28668 -Application by Maineiro Smith & Associates for Edith Armstrong Toor for 6-lot, single family residential subdivision with lots ranging in size from 0.567 to 0.9 acres on 4.48 gross acres of land located west of Rose Avenue, north of Stevens Road, 0-20 Zone, Section 10. Continued from the August 23, 2000 Planning Commission meeting. Commissioner Shoenberger abstained due to a conflict of interest. Principal Planner Hayes reported that any future homes in this hillside area would be subject to the City's architectural approval process. He stated that the current access is a gated entry from Coronado to Rose Avenue. He reported that a second lot (''B") is reserved for on-site retention and would require a change of zone from 0-20 to L2 which would bring the area into consistency with the General Plan (low density residential allowing two units per acre). He also reported that excess drainage would be retained on-site; however, State law requires overflow to follow the natural contours of the property (to the east in this case). Staff recommends a 20 foot water easement for excess drainage to Rose Avenue. He reported that the Eminent Domain process (at the applicant's expense) could be utilized if an easement is not obtainable. He reported that staff considers the biological issue less than significant on this proposed project and circulated an August 17, 2000 letter to the City from the Department of Fish and Game which outlined mitigation measures proposed to protect any Peninsular Bighorn Sheep populations in the area. This letter is on file in the Planning Division. Director reported that creative and reduced street widths are a possibility; however, the Fire Marshall may require a certain minimum (such as at least 32 feet) and that parking for residents and guests is a consideration for this area. Chairman Mills opened the Public Hearing. Page 4 of 12 Planning Commission Minutes September 13, 2000 Mr. Marvin Roos, Mainiero, Smith, & Associates, addressed the Planning Commission to state that the General Plan consistency is a requirement that this zoning change request supports. He explained that the current zoning (0-2) is intended for steep hillside areas and that the subject property is not within that description. He confirmed that the lots are subject to Design Review for individual development, as well as consideration by the Rose Avenue Association. He further stated that it is hoped that the Rose Avenue Association can join with the proposed Homeowner's Association for the subject property in order to communally maintain the gate and street, etc. He also stated that the applicant is happy to work with the Fire Department regarding the rolled curb and street issues. Mr. Jim Schlecht, Schlecht, Shevlin, & Shoenberger, addressed the Planning Commission to represent the Rose Avenue Association and Mr. Jerry Gans. He stated that he felt the conditions of approval are not currently sufficient to address the concerns the Association has. He also stated that the Association would like to work with the applicant to maintain the gate and the street. He requested that the applicant comply with the August 05, 1999 letter from the Association to the City which outlined suggested conditions. He stated that, in the absence of incorporating those suggested conditions, his clients object to the application. Mr. Robert Fey, representing Mr. Roy Fey, addressed the Planning Commission to state that he has no objections to the project; provided the above-mentioned suggested conditions are incorporated in the Conditions of Approval. Mr. Robert Schlessinger, representing the Bill Hardt Trust, concurred with Mr. Schlecht. Dr. William Grimm, neighborhood resident, addressed the Planning Commission to state that he felt the proposed project would destroy, or at least distract, his views. He asked that, if the project is approved, each pad height and elevation be settled all at once, rather than individually. Mr. Ty Hawkins addressed the Planning Commission to state that he is concerned with the density of the proposed homes in this mountainous area. There being no further appearances, the Public Hearing was closed. Principal Planner reported that pads would not be allowed to be graded without a permit for a house. He reported that the concept pad elevations of the lots were as follows: Lot One- Lot Three - Lot Five - 718 ft. Lot Two- 706 ft. Lot Four - 684 ft. Lot Six - 728 ft. 692 ft. 700 ft. Page 5 of 12 Planning Commission Minutes September 13, 2000 He clarified that these are not under consideration with today's application; they are representations of future development ideas. No grading is proposed at this time. The Planning Commission called Dr. Grimm to the podium and asked him to show the location of his home, which was designed by Richard Neutra, on the exhibited aerial photograph, which he did. Director reported that the applicant has owned this property for 15-20 years. He reported that there is an ingress/egress easement which is an extension of Rose Avenue and that it is on Mrs. Toor's property. He also reported that staff has no objection to deleting the requirements for sidewalks on the property. He further reported that there is purposefully no access to trails from the property. He stated that a six foot fence or wall is recommended to discourage any sheep from crossing onto the development. In addition to the fence or wall, another deterrent to attracting sheep is that no landscaping will be permitted outside the perimeter wall or fence. Director also stated that utilities are underground, that no overhead service is permitted for new subdivisions. He also clarified that two-story homes would need to prove a hardship or grading concerns to be approved; that it not an automatic approval process. He explained that on an 8- 10% grade, for example, a two-story home would be out of context. He also explained that it is standard operating procedure for the City to request that applicants meet with neighbors prior to the design phase of individual residences. M/S/C (Matthews/Raya 5-0, 1 absent, 1 abstain) to recommend approval to the City Council, subject to the conditions contained in the staff report and: A. Eliminate Engineering Division Condition No.6 and; B. Add recommendations in the August 05, 1999 letter to Doug Evans from Jim Schlecht as recommended language in the CC&R's prior to issuance of the Final Map and; C. No grading of individual pads shall be in conjunction with the subdivision of land and; D. Reduce street width to the satisfaction of the Fire Marshall, City Engineer and the Director of Planning & Building, if possible. ***** 3. TPM 29631 -Application by CS3F Partnership for a Tentative Parcel Map to subdivide 41.58 acres into 23 industrial lots ranging in size from 0.91 acres to 4.4 acres located on the east side of Gene Autry Trail, south of the Palm Springs Classic Project, M-I-P Zone, Section 18. Continued from the August 23, 2000 Planning Commission meeting. Commissioner Shoenberger abstained due to a conflict of interest. Page 6 of 12 Planning Commission Minutes September 13, 2000 Principal Planner Hayes reported that the City Council approved a similar application on September 20, 1995; however, the applicant has revised _the design, changed the street configurations, and the lots are smaller than originally approved. He also reported that this Public Hearing was noticed in the newspaper and to all property owners within 400 feet of the subject property; however, staff received no comments. He also reported that the Caltrans requirements have been incorporated into the recommended mitigation measures. He stated that development would be on a lot-by-lot basis and that there is no master plan. He stated that the Design Review process would keep landscaping continuous. He reported that direct access onto San Joaquin Drive is prohibited -all access is provided internally. Director reported that the Gene Autry Trail landscape easement front yard requirement is 25 feet and all landscape is consistent with what exists on North Gene Autry Trail (e.g. near Federal Express building). He stated that the main access is opposite from Gene Autry Trail with a 25 foot setback. Associate Civil Engineer Fuller reported that the City has received grant approval for landscaping in this area (including design and construction) which would relieve the developer from participating on this portion of the landscaping. Chairman Mills opened the Public Hearing. Mr. John Sanborn, Sanborn A & E, addressed the Planning Commission to state that he agrees with staff on the conditions as modified as of this date. He also stated that the landscaping will be consistent with the current style and the CC&R's will assure compliance. Mr. Jim Schlecht, Schlecht Shevlin & Shoenberger, addressed the Planning Commission to also state that the CC&R's will manage the master landscaping plan for the Gene Autry Trail and that this is the primary reason the CC&R's were developed. There being no further appearances, the Planning Commission was closed. Mr. Sanborn was called to the podium to answer questions. He reported that the center line of San Joaquin Drive is the dividing line between Cathedral City and Palm Springs and that it is a combination curb and gutter -not a rolled curb. He reported that the curb to property line block wall is seven to 22 feet and that landscaping is maintained by the property owners. He stated that this project will help improve this area of the City. He stated that the design guidelines prepared by Sanborn A & E/Tom Dozci (January 1995) go beyond City code requirements. Commissioner Raya expressed his concern that this area of landscaping is not accessible for maintenance purposes. Mr. Jim Schlecht was called to the podium. He clarified that the Association will not maintain the landscaping on San Joaquin Drive -that this will be an individual developer's responsibility as is the case in the majority of subdivisions in the City. Page 7 of 12 Planning Commission Minutes September 13, 2000 M/S/C (Klatchko/Raya 5-0, 1 abstain, 1 absent) to recommend approval to the City Council with the following additions and/or modifications: A. That the site and landscaping be developed as per the January of 1995 Design Guidelines by Tom Doczi and to the approval of the Director of Planning & Building -if conflicts arise between Design Guidelines and City Codes occur; City Codes take precedence and; B. That the landscaping and irrigation strip along Gene Autry Trail, San Joaquin, and Mission Drive be maintained by the Owner's Association and maintenance parameters be included in the CC&R's for development at the time of sale of individual lots and; C. The Mission Road connector be landscaped consistent with above-referenced Design Guidelines and; D. Planning Division Condition No. 11: Change the word "development" in second line to "buildings" and; E. Engineering Division Condition No.22: "Developer shall apply for the vacation of the west 15 feet of the existing 40 foot wide right-of-way easement on SAN JOAQUIN DRIVE from MISSION DRIVE to THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE OF APN 677-270-011, exclusive of a property line -corner cut back at the SOUTHEAST corner of the subject property in accordance with the City of Palm Springs Standard Drawing No. 105. Developer shall be responsible for the final resolution of all utilities, demolition of all existing improvements, reconstruction of affected intersecting streets and coordination of improvements with adjacent property owners, if applicable, for the street vacation. All agreements and improvement plans relative to the above-mentioned items shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to the submittal of the street improvement plans." D. 5.0838 CUP -Application by Cox Assets PCS, LLC (Sprint PCS) for a Conditional Use Permit to install a monopalm for the purpose of a wireless telecommunications facility at 1700 S. Palm Canyon Drive, R-3 Zone, Section 26. Principal Planner Hayes reported that this 65 foot monopalm is proposed to be installed at the Royal Sun Inn -at the northeast corner of South Palm Canyon Drive and Twin Palms Drive in an approximate 900 sf area. He stated that it is planned for as far northeast on the lot as possible (35 feet back from South Palm Canyon Drive and 25 feet from Twin Palms). He reported that other facilities by this developer are located in Angel Stadium and at the County building on Tahquitz Canyon Way. Because, as he reported, visibility and aesthetics are of great concern to the City, the applicant has developed a mono"palm" rather than mono"pole" in order to mitigate the visual impact to a greater degree. He showed the exhibited imitation Washingtonia Robusta to the Planning Commission. He stated that the monopalm would be Page 8 of 12 Planning Commission Minutes September 13, 2000 taller than the surrounding average-sized trees which measure from 50 to 57 feet. He reported that the pole is two feet in diameter with a textured bark covering and the plant material at the top of the pole is up to ten feet at its widest point. He also reported that in locating the monopalm at the Royal Inn, three or four parking spaces would be lost; however, parking is still sufficient. He referenced the petition received from neighborhood residents, which was copied to each Planning Commissioner. Chairman Mills opened the Public Hearing. Mrs. Rose Kruger addressed the Planning Commission to state that, had there been more time, the petition submitted would have had many more signatures on it. She stated that the petitioners live right across from the Botanical Gardens and that the proposed monopalm seems inconsistent with the area. She also mentioned that there was concern among the residents regarding potential harm or interference from the monopalm on pacemakers, hearing aids, television reception. She asked that the Planning Commission allow more time for the residents to research possible ramifications before ruling on the application. Ms. Martha Diaz, Sprint PCS, addressed the Planning Commission to request that approval be granted as designed. She stated that her company did work diligently to locate the equipment in the least intrusive area; but that Federal Mandate dictates that the pole be placed somewhere within a 1.5 mile area. She stated that the equipment cabinets are placed behind hedges and that the monopalm would be behind a large tree so that only 1 /3 of the monopalm would be visible due to the tiered effect. Mrs. Lee Blackman, resident of the Royal Hawaiian, addressed the Planning Commission to request that the monopalm be located in North Palm Springs and that she is concerned about electrical currents. Mr. Robert Doria, Independent Contractor, addressed the Planning Commission to state that he met last month with the owners of the Royal Sun Inn to determine the best location for the monopalm; paying special attention to the scenic corridor of Highway 111 and using the existing buffers of the hotel, wall, and vines. Mrs. Mildred Luphor, Twin Palms resident since 1961, addressed the Planning Commission to state her opposition to this proposed use in a residential area. She stated that she felt it would reduce the property values of the homes and condominiums in the area. There being no further appearances, the Planning Commission was closed. The Planning Commission called Mr. Doria back to the podium. He reported that the tower does not use microwave technology; that it uses radio frequency, telecommunications technology, and electricity to power the transformer. He stated that the radio frequency is governed by the FCC and that health exposure standards report no more than a 100 watt emission from these telecommunications poles. He stated that he evaluated Page 9 of 12 Planning Commission Minutes September 13, 2000 many other locations, including the roof of the hotel, but that no other location was as buffered. He also stated that it was his understanding that the most important scenic corridor to protect was Highway 111; but that now he understands that the views from South Palm Canyon Drive must be preserved as well. Commissioners discussed concerns including the proximity of the proposed monopalm to the Morton's Botanical Gardens, the height of the pole, and the size of the plant material. M/S/C (Matthews/Raya 6-0, 1 absent) to deny application with direction: the proposed monopalm is out of context with the neighborhood, the size of other trees in the vicinity, the scale of the 28' tall building adjacent, and the size of the palm fronds is excessive and out of scale. * * * * * MISCELLANEOUS Case 20.146 (County Referral) -An amended application by Mountain View Power Partners, LLC (previously SeaWest Windpower, Inc. and Venture Pacific, Inc.) for the installation of 35 900-1000 kW wind turbines OR 45 600 kW wind turbines on approximately 554.2 acres of land (WECS NO.103) located in unincorporated Riverside County, south of Interstate 10, directly north of Windy Point and directly south of Whitewater Hill, Section 13, T3S, R3E, SBBM (Sphere of Influence). Principal Planner Hayes reported that Riverside County has submitted this amended application as a courtesy for Planning Commission and City Council review which is planned for the area commonly referred to as the Whitewater grade -an open vista and prominent entryway location for west to east bound traffic on 1-10 into the Coachella Valley. He reported that the application complies with the 1,000 scenic setback as required by the County; however, the City's scenic setback is 1,315. He also reported that the diameter of the rotor and the height of the pole on each turbine has increased. He referenced the County's Draft Environmental Impact Assessment which addressed, among other issues, land use, traffic, biology, cultural issues, geography, energy, visual impact and air traffic concerns (50,000 cars east and west every day). He reported that the City Council (in June of 1999) has asked that the County consider the importance of the gateway location and that staff recommends that the City's scenic setback requirement be met (which would also be contiguous with adjacent cities' setbacks). He also reported that there is a 200 foot meteorological tower with less than the 2/3 mile setback and, although staff would ask for that to be relocated, the minimal diameter and the absence of lights make it acceptable to remain in place. He further explained that the applicant owns the adjacent property. Chairman Mills called the applicant to the podium. Page 10 of 12 Planning Commission Minutes September 13, 2000 Mr. Mike Azeka, Seawest, addressed the Planning Commission. He stated that there is a critical shortage of electricity generation. He described the subject application as more of an "infill project" because there are wind turbines completely surrounding the property. He explained that the safety setback is normally 1.1 times the total height of the wind turbine of distance from the property line when the property owner does not own and control the other side of the property line. He further explained that, in theory, the County could sell the land and the safety setbacks could then be a problem; however, there is a 25-year agreement in place that travels with the land that was judged by the County Council. Mr. Azeka clarified that although the application is for either 600 kW or 900-1000 kW generators, the actual proposal is for 600 kW. He stated that the application represents the coordination in a comprehensive style of four sites which is a benefit to the County as well as the City. He stated that the larger turbines are more difficult to install (the blades are 80-90 feet long and require special cranes) and can be more of an issue for radar clutter. He stated that the wind in this area is also strong closer to the ground so the height of the turbines is less critical. He reported that the proposed density is lower than the usual spacing. He further stated that the previous City Council resolution of denial was done in the absence of any comments from the applicant and that he plans to meet with the Mayor to augment the understanding of wind power. Commissioner Klatchko stated that he would respect the intent of the City Council's previous resolution of denial because of the Gateway issue. M/S/C (Shoenberger/Jurasky 5-1, 1 absent, Klatchko dissenting) to recommend to the City Council that the project comply with City Scenic Setback requirements from Interstate 10 to Highway 111. * * * * * SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA: Tentative Tract Map 28033 -Application by OT Palm Springs (Palm Springs Classic) -Case 5.0666 -PD 213 for the third time extension from September 06, 2000 to October 19, 2001 for a Tentative Tract Map to subdivide 369.5 acres into Vista Chino, W-M-1-P and 0-5 Zones, Sections 7 and 18. Principal Planner Hayes reported that this time extension request is due to a new agreement having been created with Tuchscher Development Enterprises, improvements being researched for the plans to reflect current market trends, and in order for the applicant to secure financing. He stated that, if approved, this would be the fifth time extension for the Planned Development District. Director reported that there would likely be amendments to existing plans and that both Mr. William Tuchschner and Mr. Ken Feenstra were available to answer questions for the Planning Commission. Page 11 of 12 Planning Commission Minutes September 13, 2000 Mr. Ken Feenstra addressed the Planning Commission to introduce Mr. Tuchschner of Leisure Development Properties - a master planned community developer. Mr. Tuchschner reported that Mr. Feenstra will serve as the Vice President of Community Relations, that Ms. Debra Duprati is working on the project, and that Mainiero, Smith, & Associates is also working on the project. Mr. Tuchschner reported that his company has a long-term interest in the community, that he would like to be an active member of the community, and that his intention is to create a new landmark development for the City. M/S/C (Matthews/Jurasky 6-0, 1 absent) to recommend approval to the City Council subject to conditions of approval. ***** COMMISSION WORK PROGRAM: Director reported that the Architectural Approval Subcommittee met yesterday and will update the City Council with a written summary of its progress. ***** CITY COUNCIL ACTIONS: Director reported that the City Council will review the City-wide quarterly budget report. He further reported that year-to-date revenues are strong. He also reported that the City Council will hear information on a Coachella Valley animal campus which would serve as a multiple-community resource for temporarily sheltering stray domestic animals. He announced that the City has initiated a "City Hotline" (778-PSCH) which will be advertised through a campaign in the near future as a way for residents to quickly reach City Hall and speak with a person (i.e. not get voice mail during business hours). He reported that the City Manager has proposed a Downtown Advisory Panel to study the management of a successful entertainment district. COMMISSION AND STAFF/REPORTS/REQUESTS: Regarding Louise's Pantry, Director reported that a series of meetings is being held by all involved in order to work toward a mutual agreement. He reported that the restauranteur has reconsidered his involvement in the project due to time delays. He summarized that land ownership and an easement are the primary issues at this time. Page 12 of 12 Planning Commission Minutes September 13, 2000 Regarding Lundin Development (Ralph's), Director reported that there had been some erroneous information in the media regarding the City Council's last meeting -that the true direction and intent of the Planning Commission is that the site be redeveloped, but with a better plan. He reported that staff is working with applicant on site design issues in preparation for the next City Council meeting. Commissioner Matthews reported that an illegal sign was posted on South Palm Canyon for a Grand Opening of the Sizzler restaurant. Director will inform code enforcement. Director reported that the access to the Lykken Trail is an access easement to City lands but is not a public easement. He stated that the City is working with the property owner to assure access. Current work in the area is for smoothing and repair of the trail. Chairman Mills reported that the Celebrity Tour buses at the Rimrock center are parking on the street. Director will inform code enforcement. Director also reported that the street construction in that area is in order to widen the street to improve traffic flow. Chairman Mills reminded all Commissioners about the Boards & Commissions Orientation to be held on September 21, 2000. Commissioner Shoenberger confirmed that he would attend. Director reported that Principal Planner Steve Hayes has resigned to accept a position in the City of Riverside as a Principal Planner and that his absence will have a significant impact on the Department. Principal Planner Hayes expressed his appreciation to the Planning Commission for their support and encouragement during his tenure. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 7:00 p.m. Respectfully Submitted, i7#~a~ Director of Planning & Building CITY OF PALM SPRINGS PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING September 27, 2000, 1 :30 p.m. Council Chambers, City Hall 3200 E. Tahquitz Canyon Way Palm Springs, CA 92262 ROLL CALL Present Present This Meeting Chris Mills, Chr. X Jeffrey Jurasky, V.Chr. X Ralph Raya X Jon Shoenberger X Philip Klatchko X Jon Caffery X Mark Matthews STAFF PRESENT Doug Evans, Director of Planning & Building Dave Barakian, City Engineer Jim Runge, Director of Information Services Steve Hayes, Principal Planner Dave Dawson, Associate Planner Michele Rambo, Assistant Planner Kimberly Chafin, Assistant Planner To Date 7 7 6 7 6 6 5 Michele Boyd, Planning Administrative Coordinator ***** Chairman Mills called the meeting to order at 1 :40 p.m. ***** FY 00-01 Excused Absences To Date 0 0 1 0 1 1 2 REPORT OF POSTING OF AGENDA: The September 27, 2000 agenda was available for public access at the City Hall exterior bulletin board and the Department of Planning & Building counter by 4:00 p.m., Friday, September 22, 2000. ***** APPROVAL OF MINUTES: M/S/C (Jurasky/Raya 6-0, 1 absent) to approve minutes of August 23, 2000 as presented. ***** Page 2 of 9 September 27, 2000 Planning Commission Minutes Chairman Mills opened the meeting to Public Comments. There being none, Public Comments was closed. ***** Case 3.1872 -Application by Cahuilla Hills HOA for an architectural approval to install auto and pedestrian gate with hillside excavation with retaining wall at Cahuilla Hills Drive, R-1-A Zone, Section 27. Principal Planner Dawson reported that the proposed electronically operated gate is 130 feet up from Palm Canyon Drive, is six feet high at the center, and has five foot high stone pilasters at the sides. He reported that a vehicular turn-around has been included in the plans. He stated that the public land is accessible currently by use of a key which is obtained at the City and that is not proposed to change; although he did report that pedestrians could access the public land without a key and that that is also not proposed to be changed. He reported that homes in the area have experienced security problems including trespassing and vandalism. Director reported that the Desert Riders use the park area through a Parks and Recreation Department permit and that, to his knowledge, that is the only group using the park facilities. He reported that most others use the Lykken Trail. He stated that the proposed gate increases security but does not make access more difficult for land users. He reported that the gate and any future street vacation are a private responsibility for maintenance. Principal Planner Dawson reported that the Homeowners Association will be required to submit legally binding CC&R's which address the maintenance issues. Mr. Marvin Roos, Mainiero, Smith, and Associates, addressed the Planning Commission. He explained that the Cahuilla Hills HOA (thirteen lots) is not a legally constituted homeowners association at this time but that their reason for forming the association is for maintenance of the gate, wall, and road. He reported that the design represents the attempt to create as minimal a cut in the hillside and obstruction as possible. He reported that Cahuilla Hills was developed in the 1920's and, for that reason, the existing stone pilasters may be difficult to match exactly; however, they will come as close as possible -probably by using fractured granite. He also reported that the streets are only 17 feet wide and that a three-point turn is necessary, at present, to exit the subject area. He also reported that the gate will likely be a two-piece gate, although this is not represented on the designs. Director explained that the homeowners would like to know what the Planning Commission may consider acceptable prior to funding a legal homeowners association. He also expressed staff's opinion that the intersection does improve the intersection at South Palm Canyon Drive. Commissioner Jurasky stated that he felt the proposal lacks true graphic design representation, adequate landscaping, and overall design creativity. Chairman Mills suggested that the applicant consider blending with the hillside; rather than matching the stone pilasters as planned. He stated that he felt that this area, one of the City's Page 3 of 9 September 27, 2000 Planning Commission Minutes first subdivisions, is quaint and natural -similar to the Mesa -and that he does not like the proposed hillside cutting. He expressed his thought that the south side of the road is a more appropriate location for walls and cutting, etc. He did express that he supported the concept of the gate -just not the plans or elevations. M/S/C (Raya/Klatchko 6-0, 1 absent) to approve in concept; and a. Subject to conditions of approval; b. Final development and landscaping plans back to the Planning Commission for consideration of all options; c. Assure, by verbiage on plaque, that pedestrians have continuous access without use of a key; ***** PUBLIC HEARINGS: Case 5.0846-Application by Nextel Communications for a Conditional Use Permit to install a commercial wireless telecommunication facility on a 60-foot tall monopole at 401 Radio Road, M-1 Zone, Section 34. Assistant Planner Chafin reported that this application is north of San Rafael, west of Indian Canyon, and bounded by industrial, storage, and business usage. She stated that Desert Highlands neighborhood is approximately 500 feet from the site and that residents have expressed concerns regarding visual impacts. She also reported that the property has perimeter security fencing and that staff does not feel additional fencing is necessary around the pole. She referenced the photo simulation of the antenna which was distributed to the Planning Commission. She stated that the monopole could allow the co-location of other antennae. She also reported that, in the event that the equipment becomes obsolete, abandoned, or the CUP expires, the applicant would be required to remove the pole. She reported that staff anticipates a substantial increase in applications for wireless communications facilities and that there will be a meeting next week with staff and representatives of wireless communications companies to establish an overall master plan to facilitate the designation of acceptable sites. She reported that staff recently received information regarding federal developments affecting municipalities on zoning and siting of cellular towers. Because of this recent information and the meeting scheduled for next week, she reported that staff recommends that this application be continued to the October 11, 2000 Planning Commission meeting. Chairman Mills opened the Public Hearing. Ms. Barbara Seito, Nextel, addressed the Planning Commission. She thanked staff for their work on the application. She confirmed that the pole will be built to enable co-location. She submitted photographic representations of the proposed pole at 50 feet and at 60 feet to show Page 4 of 9 September 27, 2000 Planning Commission Minutes the difference in visual impact. She stated that the 60 foot height is allowable by right of zone and that the airport and the Federal Aviation Association has approved the application. She stated that the proposed location is removed from the main corridors and urged the Planning Commission to take action on the application today. There being no further appearances, the Planning Commission was closed. M/S/C (Klatchko/Raya 6-0, 1 absent) to Continue to the Planning Commission meeting of October 11 , 2000. ***** Case 5.0844 -Application by Karine Seigel for a Conditional Use Permit to allow a Mercedes Auto Parts and Accessories retail and installation of same at 1100 South Palm Canyon Drive, C-1 Zone, Section 23. Assistant Planner Shurilla reported that the subject address was previously a '76 Service station and that no major auto repair is being proposed in this application. She stated that upgrades planned include the repainting of the building (although staff recommends restudy of proposed colors), resurfacing and restriping of the parking area, adding landscape planters, and a six foot high wrought iron fence. She stated that, because of the location of parking stalls, the ingress is on Palm Canyon Drive and the egress is on Palo Verde Avenue. She reported that staff has some concerns regarding the overnight storage of customer vehicles, installation activities within service bays, and the maintenance of the parking area. She stated that staff has met with applicant regarding these concerns. Planner reported no correspondence or other input from noticed neighbors regarding this public hearing. Planner also reported that there is one employee parking space and that the site is lacking two spaces; however that is addressed in the conditions through an Administrative Minor Modification. She also reported that the applicant intends to have a small retail store (170 sf including restroom) which will offer Mercedes accessories only. She explained that the business is actually running at this time and that staff is working with the applicant to do permits and other necessary compliance steps in order to support business and avoid having an additional abandoned building in the City. Director stated that, although the subject property is a converted gasoline station and may have underground tanks, environmental issues would not be addressed by the Planning Commission for this application. He clarified that the applicant knows that the property owner is working on this issue. Chairman Mills opened the Public Hearing. Mr. James Bigley, property owner, addressed the Planning Commission to report that there are underground tanks and he is working with Riverside County to rectify any concerns. Page 5 of 9 September 27, 2000 Planning Commission Minutes There being no further appearances, the Planning Commission was closed. M/S/C (Raya/Jurasky 3-1, 2 abstain, 1 absent, Mills dissenting) to approve subject to conditions in staff report; and a. Submit revised building colors and a revised sample board for review and approval. Colors should be more sympathetic to the building design; b. Eliminate the proposed perimeter fencing. Use of curbs, low walls, and landscaping discourages auto theft. Low gates across driveways should be utilized; c. Service bays must be enclosed; d. No outside work allowed; e. No display of merchandise outside; f. Construct low (between two and three feet) perimeter walls along streets. ***** Case 5.0849-Application by Carl H. Hitchner for a Conditional Use Permit to construct a guest house expansion and kitchen at 670 North Rose Ave, R-1-8 Zone, Section 10. Assistant Planner Rambo reported that this application is for a guest house expansion which has a total square footage that exceeds 1150th of the lot and that it includes kitchen facilities. She clarified that it is 122 square feet more than the allowed total of 336 square feet. She stated that there are walls and mature landscaping in back which shield the view to and from the neighbor's property and that the residence is in front of the guesthouse which shields it from the street. Chairman Mills opened the Public Hearing. Mr. Carl Hitchner, applicant, addressed the Planning Commission to thank them and staff for their consideration and work on his application. There being no further appearances, the Public Hearing was closed. M/S/C (Raya/Shoenberger 6-0, 1 absent) to approve subject to conditions in staff report. * * * * * Page 6 of 9 September 27, 2000 Planning Commission Minutes Case 3.1437 -Application by Wessman Development to construct a fountain and art work (Sonny Bono Memorial) located at the Mercado Plaza, 155 South Palm Canyon Drive, CBD Zone, Section 15. Commissioner Raya abstained due to a conflict of interest. Assistant Planner Shurilla reported that the location for the fountain was approved at the time of the Plaza Mercado application. Jerry Ogburn, Director of Downtown Development, reported that the project was started shortly after Mr. Bono's death and that the project is intended to be compatible with the Plaza Mercado building. He reported that the bronze statue of Mr. Bono is slightly larger than life size and is similar to the Lucille Ball statue on Tahquitz Canyon Drive. He assured the Planning Commission that the pedestrian flow is fine around the fountain. He also reported that Main Street has discussed the project and is supportive of it. Director reported that the review of actual artwork of the fountain and statue is the domain of the Public Arts Council. M/S/C (Jurasky/Caffery 5-0, 1 absent, 1 abstain) to approve subject to: a. Encroachment license required. City Council approval necessary; b. Water depth shall not exceed 24 inches; c. Exterior surface shall have graffiti protection; d. Bench seating shall be skateboard resistant; e. Final plans and specifications shall be reviewed by Design Review Committee. ***** Case 3.1920 -Application by Boys & Girls Club of Palm Springs for an architectural approval to construct an additional freestanding building to be used as a Teen Center at 450 South Sunrise, 0 Zone, Section 13. Commissioner Mills abstained due to a conflict of interest. Assistant Planner Rambo reported that there is sufficient parking from existing lots in the surrounding park area and that any trees or other landscaping in the building site will be relocated. Ms. Stephanie Brazil, Executive Director of the Girls & Boys Club, addressed the Planning Commission to state that the Boys & Girls Club has been a longtime part of the community and, with this application, is attempting to fill the void of activities and resources available for children Page 7 of 9 September 27, 2000 Planning Commission Minutes in their teens. She stated that there would be a social and recreational area and a learning resources area intended to support studying, a career center, and a computer lab. She reported that the Boys & Girls club currently serves approximately 350 kids per day due to its proximity to the High School and the Ramon Academy. She stated that the center will close by 9:00 p.m. and that dances or other evening activities will continue to be held in the existing facility. She stated that the center will be fully staffed by adults and that the Boys & Girls Club has an excellent relationship with the Police Department. She stated that there are no outdoor activities planned for the center. She also stated that this is the last building project planned by the Boys & Girls Club. Mr. Chris Mills, project architect, addressed the Planning Commission to describe the design of the 6,700 square feet building and show the exhibited plans. He stated that the east and west entries have a lobby entrance with a glass arch and canopy 12 ft. out for sunscreen. He reported that the base of the two-story building is plaster to match existing building and that the first floor (10 feet up) is of smooth painted corrugated metal similar to the Ralph's store on Sunrise Way and Ramon Road and the gymnasium building at the project site. He stated that future plans include enhancing original buildings to maximize the design of all. Director reported that the use of the park for development has been reviewed by, and is under the control of, the Parks and Recreation Department. He also reported that this application asks only for 1,500 square feet of park space, and that the rest is on currently leased land. M/S/C (Caffery/Raya 5-0, 1 absent, 1 abstain) to approve subject to conditions. ***** Case 20.151 -Application by County of Riverside and Seawest (WECS 107) for the installation and operation of 29 900 kW Turbines at a height of 283' directly south of the 1-10 Highway 62 intersection and directly north of Windy Point, west of Wall Road -306 acres, W-2 Zone, Section 19. Principal Planner Hayes reported that the County of Riverside and Seawest have submitted this application to the City as a courtesy review because the proposed project is located within the City's Sphere of Influence directly northeast of the City limits. He reported that the County Wind Energy Ordinance requires a minimum 1,000 foot scenic setback from the Interstate 10 right-of-way. He also reported that there is no final Environmental Impact Report yet; but that, when it is complete, the application will come back before the Planning Commission. He further reported that this application is part of a three-phase master plan which also includes WECS 103 and WECS 16 West. Chairman Mills called the applicant to address the Planning Commission. Mr. Mike Azeka, Seawest, thanked the Planning Commission and staff for their work and consideration of this application. He explained that one of the most windy areas of the valley is along the freeway; specifically close to Whitewater Hill and that his company is striving to balance wind energy retrieval with aesthetics to the greatest degree possible. He explained that the winds vary but that they blow from 60-110 mph on average which is too much for Page 8 of 9 September 27, 2000 Planning Commission Minutes homes. He also stated that risk to birds, maintenance, and worker safety are all primary concerns. He explained that enclosed towers are the safest; however, he understands that they have more visual impact than the lattice tower elements. He distributed photographic simulations to the Planning Commission for review which illustrate the difference between removing a few turbines and leaving the proposed amount and stated that he felt there was no appreciable difference to the visual impact. He explained that City residents receive almost 10% of their energy through the use of wind energy. He stated that the project does not require any City services other than slight road maintenance and that the City will benefit from collecting the property taxes. He stated that wind energy is the highest and best use of this area. He also explained that a meteorological tower encroaches into the required 2/3 mile scenic setback; however, there is no other acceptable location available. Regarding the height of wind turbines, he explained that this is based on specifications by manufacturers which need International Engineering Certifications and at a certain height, a point of diminishing returns is reached. He explained that the proposed turbines are identical to those to the west of the subject property. He also explained that, although the City is an advisory, and not a permitting, authority on this application, his company appreciates and values the City's opinion on these matters, regardless of jurisdiction. Commissioner Jurasky stated his opinion that the scenic setback is not as vital as this clean source of energy and that the turbines are a tourist attraction. Commissioner Raya also agreed that it is a tourist attraction. M/S/C (Raya/Shoenberger 4-2, 1 absent, Caffery and Jurasky dissenting) to approve and amend project to comply with City Scenic Setback requirement of 1/4 mile along Interstate 10. ***** COMMISSION WORK PROGRAM: No update. * * * * * CITY COUNCIL ACTIONS: Director reported that at its meeting last week, City Council voted to continue consideration of the amendments to the zoning ordinance in order to further study the ordinance. He also reported that City Council denied the Lundin Development (Ralph's) application without prejudice. He explained that the developer could reapply at anytime. He also stated that the project is consistent with the General Plan; however, City Council was not comfortable with the project design. Director also reported that at tonight's meeting, City Council will discuss the creation of a Redevelopment Advisory Committee, the Palmer Golf contract, and zoning text amendments. He stated that a neighborhood involvement program was on the agenda but would be removed until more research is done. ***** Page 9 of 9 September 27, 2000 Planning Commission Minutes COMMISSION/STAFF REPORTS AND REQUESTS: Director requested Planning Commission approval to read in a request for a additional item to the agenda. Chairman Mills gave consent. Director presented a proposed resolution. M/S/C (Caffery/Jurasky 6-0, 1 absent) to adopt the resolution expressing its thanks and appreciation for Steve Hayes' contribution to the community. Planning Commissioners and Director thanked Steve for his outstanding work and contribution to the City. ***** Commissioner Jurasky asked staff to check a illegal banner on El Cielo Center. * * * * * Commissioner Shoenberger reported that he attended the September 21, 2000 Commission and Board Training Session and noted several helpful topics were covered such as exparte contacts and Brown Act information. * * * * * Chairman Mills asked for clarification on approval of the Arco service station on Ramon Road. Director reported that, although preliminary plans showed a water feature, final development plans approved did not include a fountain or other water feature. * * * * * Commissioner Caffery asked staff to check the completed paint job of a recent hillside single family residence as it does not seem to correspond with the approved pallette. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 5:05 p.m. Respectfully Submitted ~- Director of Planning & Building ROLL CALL Chris Mills, Chr. CITY OF PALM SPRINGS PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING October 11, 2000, 1 :30 p.m. Council Chambers, City Hall 3200 E. Tahquitz Canyon Way Palm Springs, CA 92262 Present Present This Meeting To Date X 8 Jeffrey Jurasky, V.Chr. X 8 Ralph Raya X Jon Shoenberger X Philip Klatchko X Jon Caffery X Mark Matthews X STAFF PRESENT Doug Evans, Director of Planning & Building Hope Sullivan, Principal Planner Dave Dawson, Associate Planner Tina Shurilla, Assistant Planner Kimberly Chafin, Assistant Planner 7 8 7 7 6 Michele Boyd, Planning Administrative Coordinator ***** Chairman Mills called the meeting to order at 1 :45 p.m. ***** FY 00-01 Excused Absences To Date 0 0 1 0 1 1 2 REPORT OF POSTING OF AGENDA: The October 11, 2000 agenda was available for public access at the City Hall exterior bulletin board and the Department of Planning & Building counter by 4:00 p.m., Friday, October 06, 2000. ***** APPROVAL OF MINUTES: M/S/C (Matthews/Raya 6-0, 1 abstention) to approve minutes of September 13, 2000 as presented. ***** Page 2 of 8 October 11, 2000 Planning Commission Minutes Chairman Mills opened the meeting to Public Comments. There being none, Public Comments was closed. ***** CONSENT AGENDA: Case 3.1882 -Application by William Johnson for an architectural approval to construct a new single family residence at 2380 Smokewood Drive, R-1 Zone, Section 25. Associate Planner Dawson reported to the Planning Commission that the frontage of the subject property is on Araby Drive and that right-of-way issues for both Smokewood Avenue and Araby Drive are addressed in the conditions of approval. M/S/C (Matthews/Caffery 7-0) to approve subject to conditions. ***** Vista Chino/Farrell Landscape Improvements (TKO Associates for the City of Palm Springs). Commissioner Klatchko requested that this application be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed under standard consideration. Director reported that directional airport signage may be confusing at this project site and that the Airport Commission does not support signage at this area. He reported that there have been three revisions made to the conceptual plans from August 02, 2000. He stated that they are that desert wild flowers, which are sustainable with seasonal rain, have been incorporated into the design for the west side of Farrell; that plant locations have been modified to create a more random pattern of groupings and mass; and, finally, that boulders will be incorporated at the corner of Farrell and Vista Chino. He further explained that landscaping lighting is not proposed due to FAA regulations. Mr. Tom Doczi was called to speak to the Planning Commission. He explained that the design is similar to the Mid Valley Parkway at Baristo and has a rock cobble dry streambed effect. He stated that the meandering landscape at the southwest corner of Vista Chino and Farrell has large, existing creosote bushes which have been blended into the design. He reported that minor berming (at a level of from four-to-six inches up to 12 inches) has been planned to capture rain and give a natural look to the desert transitional area. Commissioner Jurasky expressed his opinion that a monument or statue would be appropriate at this corner site as it is a major entryway into the City and to the airport. He stated that a more dramatic statement could and should be made at the location. He stated that Vista Chino and Farrell are primary streets for airport access and the landscape design should be made to showcase that location. Page 3 of 8 October 11 , 2000 Planning Commission Minutes Commissioner Shoenberger agreed that a more dramatic look to the area would be preferable; however, did not recommend signage. He also mentioned his hope that the City will improve its overall signage in the near future. Assistant City Manager Al Smoot addressed the Planning Commission to report that the landscape architect is currently working on the plans for the Ramon Road and Gene Autry Trail area and will be brought before the Planning Commission in the near future. He also reported that there will be directional airport signs at this corner. Director reported that a City-wide signage program is under development through the Public Arts Commission (PAC). He reported that a recent competition for City Entry signs did not produce an acceptable program that would meet the objectives of the City. He reported that the PAC now plans to research possibilities for signage with the design community. He reported that the Airport Commission considers signage locations for the airport. Chairman Mills stated that he felt that a monument statement for the subject property could be confusing as it may give the impression of being at the airport when, in fact, the area between the subject property and airport is residential. M/S/C (Shoenberger/Caffery 5-2, Klatchko and Jurasky dissenting) to approve. * * * * * PUBLIC HEARINGS: Case 5.0846 -Application by Nextel Communications for a Conditional Use Permit to install a commercial wireless telecommunication facility on a 60-foot tall monopole at 401 Radio Road, M-1 Zone, Section 34. Continued from September 27, 2000 Planning Commission meeting. Assistant Planner Chafin reported to the Planning Commission that this application was continued from the last Planning Commission meeting. She explained that, in the interim, staff met with more than a dozen cellular, PCS, and wireless communication company representatives to create a master plan which would facilitate co-location to the greatest extent possible to reduce the potential number of poles (which could require as many as one pole each one-to-two miles). She reported that the Director of Information Technology would give the Planning Commission an update concerning this meeting and subsequent research (including information regarding the number of cellular, PCS, and wireless communications companies that may request sites in the City) at its November Study Session. She also reported that condition of approval #13 reflects the language requested at the last meeting that ensures co-location of subject pole to minimize the number of poles at any one location. She noted that the applicant has also submitted a letter to the City agreeing to cooperate with the property owner and a future carrier for co-location. Director stated that the City has a good reputation for being a technology-friendly community and, as technology evolves, the City will endeavor to keep abreast of current trends and requirements. Page 4 of 8 October 11 , 2000 Planning Commission Minutes The applicant was called to address the Planning Commission. Mr. Barbara Saito, Nextel, thanked the Planning Commission for their consideration and staff for the hard work and research put forth for this application. She stated that Nextel has researched all options for the area where the pole is required, including the ball field, and has not located an appropriate alternative. She reported that there are six carriers currently in business in this area and all are working cooperatively to coordinate co-location and that master agreements are in place between several carriers to support this. She explained to the Planning Commission the requirements for placement of co-located antennae and that different frequencies (e.g. 800 megahertz vs. 1.9 gigahertz) create different mounting requirements and, also, that two of the same technology (e.g. cellular and cellular) are not able to be co-located. She stated that, with proper co-location plans, as many as three-to-four carriers could utilize one pole. Chairman Mills opened the Public Hearing. There being no appearances, the Public Hearing was closed. Director reported that the surrounding land use is predominately industrial with some residential areas (which are somewhat sheltered and removed from the subject area). Planning Commissioners commended the applicant for their work and commented that the proposed site is an excellent choice, and that having all equipment on the interior of an existing building is a superior model for future similar projects. M/S/C (Matthews/Klatchko 7-0) to approve subject to conditions in staff report. * * * * * Applications by Sobhy G. Yousef for: a. Case 6.448 - a variance from Section 9320.05.C.1 of the Zoning Ordinance so as to allow for a larger gasoline service station sign at 2796 North Palm Canyon Drive, RGA/C-1 Zone, Section 3; and b. Case 3.1912 -an architectural approval for alterations at 2796 North Palm Canyon Drive, R-G-A/C-1 Zone, Section 3. Principal Planner Sullivan reported that at the September 13, 2000 Planning Commission the application for alterations to this 1964 William Cody-designed station was denied with direction. She reported that the applicant is proposing to leave all structures as is, paint the edge of the canopy yellow and the remaining structure white. She also reported that existing landscaping will be preserved and enhanced. She explained that, because there will be no alterations to the canopy (including signage), the applicant is requesting a variance in order to erect a 10.07 foot monument sign which would incorporate the Shell Gasoline logo in red and yellow and white colors. She stated that there is currently equipment on the roof and that staff is working with applicant on existing improvements at the site. She reported that, at its highest, the canopy is 17 feet and, at its lowest, 13 feet. Page 5 of 8 October 11, 2000 Planning Commission Minutes Chairman Mills opened the Public Hearing. There being no appearances, the Public Hearing was closed. Planning Commissioners urged staff to work with applicant on lighting and demarcation of the driveway. Case 6.448 -M/S/C (Caffery/Shoenberger 6-1, Jurasky dissenting) to adopt resolution. Sign details to be reviewed and approved by staff. Case 3.1912 -M/S/C (Caffery/Shoenberger 6-1, Jurasky dissenting) to approve subject to conditions and that landscaping be improved to the satisfaction of the Director of Planning and Building. * * * * * ARCHITECTURAL APPROVAL: Case 3.1928 -Application by David Christian to remodel the Chop House restaurant located at 262 South Palm Canyon remodel, C-8-D Zone, Section 15. Commissioner Raya abstained due to a conflict of interest. Director reported that this application is for a complete renovation of the facade, including the addition of a stone front, of the subject property by the owners of the Kaiser Grille. He reported that plans include widening the entryway, having a second level floor for light dining, cocktails, and light entertainment. He stated that staff did not recommend live entertainment on the second floor due to noise and police concerns. He reported that $150,000 of in-lieu parking fees will be applied due to the parking deficiency. He explained that, because the property has been closed for more than six months, any prior permit status has been lost and the project is viewed as brand new. He explained that the proposal represents a substantial increase and intensification of the existing land use. He reported that no samples of the outdoor furniture are available at this time. Chairman Mills stated that he would like to see the full elevations of the proposal and suggested that glue-lams be continued to the back of the building and the low wall be of a deeper color. M/S/C (Jurasky/Caffery 6-0, 1 abstaining) to approve subject to conditions. * * * * * Sign Program -Sign application by Promotional Signs for a new monument sign for Allen Tire Company located at 675 South Palm Canyon Drive, C-2 Zone, Section 23. Assistant Planner Shurilla reported that the current sign is red on white with 1 /4-inch push- through lettering, but approval required 3/4-inch push-through lettering. She reported that, when staff asked that the sign be reconstructed as-approved, the applicant decided to resubmit a larger sign with a different design, with white on red, one inch push-through lettering on Page 6 of 8 October 11, 2000 Planning Commission Minutes aluminum facing, and is 2.5 feet from the sidewalk. Director reported that staff has met with sign companies as a group to determine operational issues. He explained that a one inch push-through is a fairly uncommon dimension and is more expensive than 3/4-inch or 1 /2-inch push-through lettering. He also stated that staff does not recommend the red color proposed on the signage because it does not work with the architecture of the subject building and that the monument sign is so large that the field of color would be too intense; especially as the sign is so close to the sidewalk. He reported that there are no copyright issues known to staff regarding the application. Chairman Mills called the applicant to address the Planning Commission. Mr. Richard Christie, Promotional Signs, addressed the Planning Commission to explain that the cost and viability of the sign design are priorities of his client. He explained that, currently, the site has two signs and that, to conform, his client has agreed to cover the building sign and apply for only a monument sign at this time. He stated that red is the corporate color for this small business owner (there are several other Southern California locations with the red and white colored signs) and that 52% of all signs have red on them. He also stated that the applicant plans to include a mow strip around the base (which could be concrete) of the monument. M/S/C (Raya/Klatchko 4-3, Jurasky, Caffery, and Matthews dissenting) to approve subject to the following: a. Applicant to work with staff to utilize a color other than bright red that will complement the terra cotta building color; b. Applicant to work with staff to determine appropriate dimension of push-through lettering; c. Build in a six-inch mow-strip around base of sign. * * * * * COMMISSION WORK PROGRAM: Director reported that staff is working on a summary of sign company meeting outcome for the Planning Commission. He also reported that the subcommittee on the Section 14 Master Plan (Commissioners Mills, Jurasky, and Caffery) will meet jointly with the Tribal Planning Commission. Director stated no further update on the Work Program and that, due to low staffing levels, he will report next month to the Planning Commission which Work Program items may be put on hold. Chairman Mills reported that Commissioner Jurasky will attend the City Council Cabinet Meeting in his place. Page 7 of 8 October 11 , 2000 Planning Commission Minutes Director reported that items on the Cabinet agenda include freeway interchange design for the Gene Autry Trail bridge. Director reported that at the October 04, 2000 meeting, the City Council approved a $600 per acre fee for development of Fringe-toed Lizard habitat, which is a significant issue in Thousand Palms. Director reported that the Bergheer application was approved without significant issues and the applicant has voluntarily agreed to donate $600 per acre of development to the Friends of the Desert for open space -the applicant using the Fringe-toed lizard fees as a guideline. Director reported that the Historic Site Preservation Board recommendation that the tie-down on Easmore and the O'Donnell House be classified as Class One Historic Sites was approved at the October 04, 2000 City Council meeting. He also reported that the zoning text amendments, as revised in Study Session, were approved. Director reported that the time extension application for the Palm Springs Classic was approved for a six-month extension only and that the City Council stated it would consider a second six- month extension after review of project progress. Director reported that the City Council adopted a resolution of denial at its October 04, 2000 meeting for the Mountain View Wind Energy project application for WECS 103 and 107, stating that the proposed setback is not enough to protect this important view corridor. He reported that the County approved WECS 103 but WECS 107 needs further environmental work. Director reported that the Lundin application (Ralph's) was denied at that meeting; however, staff will work with applicant for possible reconsideration. COMMISSION/STAFF REPORTS AND REQUESTS: Commissioner Shoenberger encouraged staff to appeal to any agency possible to remedy the traffic problems on Ramon Road at the Interstate 10 intersection. Director stated that the Tribal Council is very concerned and is working cooperatively with agencies to effect an interim solution while permanent plans are in process. Commissioner Matthews reported that the chain that was at the top of Bogert Trail is missing. Director stated that Engineering will research. Commissioner Klatchko asked for a status update on the Downtown Fashion Plaza. Director reported that the property is on the market, that bids have been received, and the process is underway for new ownership. He stated that the City is waiting for an official announcement. Commissioner Jurasky asked for an update on Star Canyon. Director reported that the developer is working diligently to move forward and consulting with the Redevelopment Agency. ., Page 8 of 8 October 11 , 2000 Planning Commission Minutes Director reported that staff is struggling to keep up with customer service demands during this busy time and while the Department recruits for the Principal Planner and Senior Secretary positions. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 4:10 p.m. Respectfully Submitted, ~ Douglas R. Evans Director of Planning & Building ROLL CALL Chris Mills, Chr. CITY OF PALM SPRINGS PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING October 25, 2000, 1 :30 p.m. Council Chambers, City Hall 3200 E. Tahquitz Canyon Way Palm Springs, CA 92262 Present Present This Meeting To Date 8 Jeffrey Jurasky, V.Chr. X 9 Ralph Raya Jon Shoenberger X Philip Klatchko X Jon Caffery Mark Matthews X STAFF PRESENT Hope Sullivan, Principal Planner Tina Shurilla, Assistant Planner 7 9 8 7 7 Michele Boyd, Planning Administrative Coordinator ***** Vice Chairman Jurasky called the meeting to order at 1 :37 p.m. ***** FY 00-01 Excused Absences To Date 1 0 2 0 1 2 2 REPORT OF POSTING OF AGENDA: The October 25, 2000 agenda was available for public access at the City Hall exterior bulletin board and the Department of Planning & Building counter by 4:00 p.m., Friday, October 20, 2000. ***** APPROVAL OF MINUTES: M/S/C (Klatchko/Matthews 4-0, 3 absent) to approve minutes of September 27, 2000 as presented. ROLL CALL Chris Mills, Chr. CITY OF PALM SPRINGS PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING November 08, 2000, 1 :30 p.m. Council Chambers, City Hall 3200 E. Tahquitz Canyon Way Palm Springs, CA 92262 Present Present This Meeting To Date X 9 Jeffrey Jurasky, V.Chr. X 10 Ralph Raya Jon Shoenberger X Philip Klatchko Jon Caffery Mark Matthews X STAFF PRESENT Doug Evans, Director of Planning & Building Hope Sullivan, Principal Planner Dave Dawson, Associate Planner Michele Rambo, Assistant Planner 7 10 8 7 8 Rebecca Clark, Community Preservation Officer Michele Boyd, Planning Administrative Coordinator ***** Chairman Mills called the meeting to order at 2:10 p.m. ***** FY 00-01 Excused Absences To Date 1 0 3 0 2 3 2 REPORT OF POSTING OF AGENDA: The November 08, 2000 agenda was available for public access at the City Hall exterior bulletin board and the Department of Planning & Building counter by 4:00 p.m., Friday, November 03, 2000. ***** APPROVAL OF MINUTES: M/S/C (Jurasky/Matthews 4-0, 3 absent) to approve minutes of October 11, 2000 as presented. M/S/C (Jurasky/Matthews 3-0, 1 abstain, 3 absent) to approve minutes of October 25, 2000 as presented. Page 2 of 4 November 08, 2000 Planning Commission Minutes Chairman Mills opened the meeting to Public Comments. There being no appearances, Public Comments was closed. ***** PUBLIC HEARINGS: Case 5.0847 -Application by Joset Roberts for a time extension of the nonconforming use of two single family residential units on each parcel located at 3915 and 3945 El Dorado Blvd., R- 1-D Zone, Section 34. Associate Planner Dawson reported that this time extension request is for the nonconforming use of property that has had multiple owners and has been vacant since 1997. He explained that there have been several violations of the Uniform Building Code and of the Uniform Housing Code. He stated that there had been continuous vandalism, drug use, and prostitution occurring on the site and that in 1999, the City secured the buildings and ordered the disconnection of utilities. He reported that the City's policy, as per City Council direction, is to convert all multi-family structures to single family residences by the year 2005, which was fully supported by the neighborhood. He reported that staff recommends denial of the request for a time extension. Chairman Mills opened the Public Hearing. Ms. Joset Roberts, applicant, addressed the Planning Commission. She stated that she has owned the property since 1996, with the exception of 1999 during which the property was taken by FDIC. She stated that, although the windows are boarded up, there are windows. She stated that all walls have been textured and three new roofs installed which have been inspected by Building staff. She reported that she had spent $22,000 in renovations on the subject property. She stated that, in reacquiring the property from the FDIC, it is required that the property be sold only to first-time or low-income home buyers. She requested that the City release the authorization to Edison to restore power. She also stated that, if granted the extension, she would have all work complete within one month and would ask that the Building Division release the occupancy permit. She said that the Freedom Assembly is anxious to collect rent for these units and stated that in 1998 the dwellings appraised for $160,000 but that an appraisal in September of 2000, it was valued at $100,000. There being no further appearances, the Public Hearing was closed. Director reported that a time extension request can be granted for a maximum of two years and that this property must be converted to single family residential by 2005. He also confirmed that the applicant would have the right to appeal to the City Council if Planning Commission denies the request. M/S/C (Matthews/Shoenberger 4-0, 3 absent) to deny time extension. Director reported that the neighborhood has requested that apartments be phased out and replaced with single family residential use. He reported that the City Council recently upheld the Planning Commission denial of a similar request (by Mr. Parham Noori-Esfandiari) for Page 3 of 4 November 08, 2000 Planning Commission Minutes continuing a multi-family use. He stated that staff will expand the staff report to include concerns of property owners for the City Council if the applicant appeals the Planning Commission decision. ***** Case 5.0851 -Application by Palm Springs Tennis Club for a Conditional Use Permit for the installation of lights for tennis courts 7, 8, and 9 located at 701 W. Baristo Road, R-G-A-8 Zone, Section 15. Removed from agenda per applicant request. ***** CONSENT AGENDA: Case 3.1608 -Application by Wildcat 36 for Planning Commission consideration of a one-year time extension for architectural approval for the construction of six buildings to be used for light industrial use at Orr Way, between Ruppert Street and Newhan Street, M-2 Zone, Section 15. Director reported that this application has received Planning Commission approval; however, staff realized, after checking permit files, that a time extension would be necessary. M/S/C (Matthews/Shoenberger 4-0, 3 absent) to approve as submitted. ***** Case 3.1609 -Application by Brian Orr for Planning Commission consideration of a one-year time extension for architectural approval to allow the construction of one building to be used for light industrial at Newhall Street, between Orr Way and 19th Avenue, M-2 Zone, Section 15. Director reported that this application has received Planning Commission approval; however, staff realized, after checking permit files, that a time extension would be necessary. M/S/C (Matthews/Shoenberger 4-0, 3 absent) to approve as submitted. ***** MISCELLANEOUS: Pavilion Parking Lot -Discussion of parking lot striping. Director explained that the Parks and Recreation Department has been receiving complaints concerning the white striping on white concrete parking lot at the Pavilion which is very difficult to see, especially after dark. He reported that the dot spots used at the Mizell Senior Center have not caused trip concerns there. Planning Commission agreed with the use of dot spots for delineating parking spaces at this lot. . . : ' Page 4 of 4 November 08, 2000 Planning Commission Minutes COMMISSION WORK PROGRAM: Director requested that a Planning Commission member volunteer to participate in the Airport Master Plan Subcommittee. Commissioner Matthews volunteered to serve. CITY COUNCIL ACTIONS: Director reported that the City Council meeting for tonight was cancelled and that, at last week's meeting, there were no Planning Commission issues. COMMISSION/STAFF REPORTS AND REQUESTS: Commissioner Shoenberger requested that staff research any possible remedy to the traffic delays on Gene Autry Trail at Ramon Road and at Palm Canyon Drive; including researching the feasibility of adjusting the signaling sequence. Director reported that the signals are Caltrans signals; but that staff would address the issue with the City Traffic Engineer. Director reported that Associate Planner Dave Dawson has given his resignation and his last day with the City will be November 17, 2000. He also reported that the recruitment for the Principal Planner position will close on November 13, 2000. ***** There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 3:00 p.m. Respectfully Submitted, ilf~ Director of Planning and Building ROLL CALL Chris Mills, Chr. CITY OF PALM SPRINGS PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING November 22, 2000, 1 :30 p.m. Council Chambers, City Hall 3200 E. Tahquitz Canyon Way Palm Springs, CA 92262 Present Present This Meeting To Date X 10 Jeffrey Jurasky, V.Chr. 10 Ralph Raya X Jon Shoenberger X Philip Klatchko X Jon Caffery Mark Matthews X STAFF PRESENT Doug Evans, Director of Planning & Building Hope Sullivan, Principal Planner Kim Chafin, Assistant Planner 8 11 9 7 9 Michele Boyd, Planning Administrative Coordinator ***** Chairman Mills called the meeting to order at 1 :35 p.m. ***** FY 00-01 Excused Absences To Date 1 1 3 0 2 4 2 REPORT OF POSTING OF AGENDA: The November 22, 2000 agenda was available for public access at the City Hall exterior bulletin board and the Department of Planning & Building counter by 4:00 p.m., Friday, November 17, 2000. ***** APPROVAL OF MINUTES: M/S/C (Matthews/Shoenberger 3-0, 2 abstain, 2 absent) to approve minutes of November 08, 2000 as presented. Page 2 of 10 November 22, 2000 Planning Commission Minutes Chairman Mills opened the meeting to Public Comments. Mr. Mark Matthews addressed the Planning Commission to ask that the project adjacent to his home on Camino Baranca be reviewed by the Planning Commission for compliance with permits; especially hillside grading. He reported that heavy excavation work (including removing huge boulders, clearing a 3/4 mile road up hill, clearing pads) is being done; however, his understanding is that staff authorized the filling of potholes only. He urged that the Planning Commission take action to stop the hillside grading. There being no further appearances, Public Comments was closed. * * * * * MISCELLANEOUS: Case 3.1114 -Appeal of the Planning Director's decision by Casitas Arenas HOA for the relocation of fountain equipment and the painting of a wall at 801-881 E. Arenas Road, R-4 Zone, Section 14. Principal Planner Sullivan reported that the applicant is appealing the Director's decision to require that the fountain built without permits be properly screened, that the block wall be painted, and that fountain equipment be moved so as not to be seen from the right of way before architectural approval can be granted. Because the applicant was not present at the time, the item was tabled at the Director's suggestion until later in the meeting. ***** SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA: Case 5.0666 and TTM 28033 (PD 231) -Application by Tuchscher Development Enterprises, Inc. for a one year time extension for Palm Springs Classic project located at the southeast corner of Vista Chino and Gene Autry Trail, M-1-P zone, Sections 7 and 18. Commissioner Shoenberger abstained due to a conflict of interest. Principal Planner Sullivan reported the Planned Development has received five time extensions and the tentative map has received three since the original approval. She reported that the current applicant had previously requested a one-year time extension, which was approved by the Planning Commission; however City Council approved the extension for six months at its meeting of October 04, 2000 with the stipulation that progress must be proven before the second six-month extension would be granted. She explained that the applicant is asking for a one year time extension from the date this request is considered by City Council. She explained that this time is needed to do appropriate plan design revisions in response to perceived market demand and to obtain financing. Director stated that he is pleased with the applicant's progress to date. Ms. Debra Diprati, Palm Springs Leisure Properties, Inc., addressed the Planning Commission Page 3 of 10 November 22, 2000 Planning Commission Minutes to thank staff for their assistance. She stated that there are major changes to the plans, including the addition of 1,000 residential units, and that her firm would like to obtain public and City input prior to finalizing plans. She stated that she had met with Mayor Kleindienst and presented the revised site plans to him, which will also be reviewed at the December 06, 2000 Planning Commission Study Session. Commissioner Klatchko expressed his concern that the Planning Commission respect the City Council's direction on this application and that the time extension does seem reasonable . M/S/C (Klatchko/Matthews 4-0, 1 abstain, 2 absent) to grant time extension of one year from the time this request is approved by the City Council. ***** CONTINUED: Case 3.1114 -Appeal of the Planning Director's decision by Casitas Arenas HOA for the relocation of fountain equipment and the painting of a wall at 801-881 E. Arenas Road, R-4 Zone, Section 14. Because the applicant was not present, Director suggested that the appeal be continued after any public comments were received. He also recommended that Planning Commissioners do a site visit in order to fully understand the detail of the appeal. Chairman Mills opened the public comments. Mr. Ty Cullen addressed the Planning Commissioners to thank them for their time and state that he would return when the appeal is rescheduled to give his comments. Commissioner Klatchko suggested that improved photos be presented at the rescheduled date. M/S/C (Raya/Shoenberger 5-0, 2 absent) to continue to the December 13, 2000 Planning Commission meeting. ***** PUBLIC HEARINGS: Case 5.0843 -Application by Friend Development Palm Springs, LLC, for a Conditional Use Permit and Architectural Approval for a 104-unit apartment complex at the southeast corner of East Palm Canyon and Araby Drive, R-3 Zone, Section 25. Commissioner Shoenberger abstained due to a conflict of interest. Assistant Planner Chafin reviewed the application and exhibits for the Planning Commission. She explained that the site is relatively flat with native vegetation and no overhead utilities; however, the stip of land between East Palm Canyon Drive and the access road to Palapas Nursery slopes down from north to south, with the street grade being approximately seven feet higher than the proposed finished floor near the east end of the property. She explained that Page 4 of 10 November 22, 2000 Planning Commission Minutes access to the project would be from Araby Drive and will have a gated entry. She also explained that the property to the west is vacant; to the south developed with single-story multi- family residential units. She stated that an existing private street separates the majority of the existing units from the proposed project and that the conditions of approval include requirements for heavy landscaping and six-foot walls between the two uses. She explained that two of the existing condominiums are close to the property line and there is an existing 8- 1 O ft. hedge between the proposed two-story development and the existing single-story units. She reported that the South Park Homeowners Association submitted a list of ten requested additional conditions of approval which, she reported, the developer is in agreement with and are on file in the Planning Division. She further reported that the property to the west is occupied by Palapas Nursery and this will also be conditioned to include six-foot walls and heavy landscape screening. Planner explained that the operators of Palapas Nursery notified staff that a recorded easement exists that shows that the access road is 30 feet wide and that the new access road must be at least that wide and of the same, or better, composition as the existing road. She pointed out that the developer's plans show a 24-foot wide access road with a five-foot wide sidewalk. Director explained the Caltrans maps and the right-of-way for East Palm Canyon and the effect upon the perimeter of the project, the berming, fill slope and easement design. He stated that the irregular shape and awkward location of the lot make the project a design challenge. He commended the applicant for their work on this challenging site and recommended that the Planning Commission continue the application until the applicant could work through neighborhood issues and confirm accurate right-of-way and setbacks. Chairman Mills opened the Public Hearing. Mr. Tim Lester, JWL Development Concepts, addressed the Planning Commission to state that his firm has a philosophy for the site that includes a pleasant entry off of Araby Drive, a turnaround in back, buildings with 12-16 units with balconies, patios, walk-in closets and will keep them away from Highway 111 as much as possible. Mr. Hugh Kaptur addressed the Planning Commission to state that his design intent is to keep it simple with a contemporary scheme with traditional elements at the entrances. Mr. David Mlynarski, project engineer, described and showed a map of the irregularly-shaped centerline of East Palm Canyon Drive. He reported that the project is situated at the site of Phase Two of the existing adjacent condominiums. He asked to address Engineering conditions of approval numbers 4, 7, 15, and 17 after the Public Hearing is closed. Mr. Joe Kennedy, Araby Road resident, addressed the Planning Commission to state that the proposed project is 55 feet away from his home and that, although he wants the project to go forward, he feels that it has too many units and is too high. Mr. Stan Foster, member of the Board of Directors of the Park South HOA, addressed the Planning Commission to urge that the 30-foot road stay intact and that a traffic light be installed at Araby Road and East Palm Canyon Drive for safety reasons. He thanked staff for attending Page 5 of 10 November 22, 2000 Planning Commission Minutes the HOA meeting on November 18, 2000 and said that the developers have been very agreeable to work with and that the project is harmonious. Mr. David Baron, Slovak, Baron, & Hemphil, addressed the Planning Commission to urge that the 30-foot road is maintained, that he is confident that the landscape plan is appropriate, and that he is pleased with the proposed signage. He commended the developer for their work on this project. Mr. Dave Gilmore, Araby Road resident, addressed the Planning Commission to thank staff for attending the HOA meeting. He stated that his concerns are regarding the setbacks and requested reduction in parking. Mr. Vern Chupp, Araby Road resident, addressed the Planning Commission to state that he is unhappy with a high-density apartment project at this site. Mr. Scott Kennedy addressed the Planning Commission to state that the rear-yard setback is (19') concerning to him as far as loss of privacy. He stated that he is also concerned with landscaping, specifically the sweet acacia, the eucalyptus, and pine. He explained that the view of the palm trees along South Ridge is an important view from his neighborhood. There being no further appearances, the Public Hearing was closed. Mr. David Mlynarski, project engineer was called to the podium to address right-of-way issues. He stated that the developer is willing to work with the City to assure that the applicable portion of East Palm Canyon Drive is re-striped, that Araby Road is widened, and that a traffic light is considered for Araby Road and East Palm Canyon Drive. He stated that the developer will work with Palapas Nursery on the signage. Engineering staff reported that the City Traffic Engineer has checked the revised traffic study (which did address a traffic light at the intersection of Araby Road and East Palm Canyon Drive) and confirmed that the definitive turning lanes are sufficient. She explained that expansion of traffic signals is predicated upon traffic generated by development in the general area over the next 10-20 years (which includes the current project). Director stated that carports are not required by code and that proposed carports may encroach into the East Palm Canyon Drive setback. He stated that a variance could be filed or the carports eliminated. He stated that parking is not a significant concern with the project. He reviewed the site map and elevations for the Planning Commission. Commissioner Raya suggested that the back and front doors be lit with shielded lighting ore recessed down lights to avoid random patterns or hot spots. Director reported that the existing condominium developer's chose to build under the allowable density and that Phase 11 of the condominiums would have been allowed to build at the proposed density. He explained that with the proposed development, security will be increased for adjacent neighbors and street noise will be reduced. He stressed the importance of landscaping buffer between the properties, and explained that although the property has many deterrents to development, he is please with the progress which the developer has made to Page 6 of 10 November 22, 2000 Planning Commission Minutes date on the plans. He asked that the developer bring exhibits with proper right-of-way delineations and encroachments to show enhanced landscape and blow-ups of this area of Palm Canyon Drive. He stated that five foot sidewalks are an expectation for those plans. He observed that the letter received from the homeowners association did not mirror the comments during the public hearing. He suggested that the developers have another meeting with the homeowners association to review setbacks and landscaping. Director stated that there will be a tree program around the perimeter of the project, with the accent on Palm Canyon Drive. He also stated that the conditions of approval would be redrafted to include the agreed-upon requests from the homeowners association and that the engineering conditions would reflect the changes discussed. Commissioner Raya stated that he was comfortable with the project, its architecture, and lighting. He stated that he would like to see the air conditioning units represented on the plans. He also asked that traffic and the signal on Araby Road and Palm Canyon Drive be discussed further. M/S/C (Klatchko/Raya 5-0, 2 absent) to continue to the December 13, 2000 Planning Commission meeting. ***** Case 5.0850, TTM 29695 (PD 263) -Application by Coachella Valley Housing for a Planned Development and Tentative Tract map to allow for a nine-lot subdivision and single family residential development located along the west side of Avenida Caballeros between Cottonwood Road and Chuckwalla Road, R-2 Zone, Section 11. Director reported that the City has been working with this neighborhood to improve and upgrade the area. He reported that the City has demolished several substandard and dangerous buildings in the neighborhood. He stated that there has been some redevelopment activity south of Vista Chino and east of Indian Avenue. He explained that the Coachella Valley Housing Coalition (CVHC) promotes pride of ownership in single family residence living environments. He stated that the project has narrow lots with deep buildings and that the project attempts to have one to two covered parking spaces per unit - a direct result of neighborhood meetings at which suggestions included reducing the amount of street parking. Director recommended that the parkway be brought into the City improvement area and that all other landscape area be maintained by individual property owners. He also reported that an eight-foot bikeway will be installed in this area. Chairman Mills opened the Public Hearing. Mr. JR Dahlberg, neighborhood resident, addressed the Planning Commission to state that the early project plans and proposed plans do have significant differences and that he is concerned that resident children have enough safe play area within their own yards. He also asked that landscape maintenance and after-school traffic and safety be addressed. Mr. Reuel Young, project architect, addressed the Planning Commission to explain the goal behind the decision to go with single family residences rather than multi-family units. He stated Page 7 of 10 November 22, 2000 Planning Commission Minutes that the sense of pride and ownership is an important element for the program. He explained that the yards are configured with an exclusive use agreement; not zero lot lines. He stated that safe play areas for children have been incorporated outside kitchen windows and in side and rear yards. He reported that building footprints cover only 30% of the lots and that they are upgrades compared to attached homes. He stated that the roofs are upgraded with tile. He explained that these prospective homeowners have the least choice in the marketplace and it has been his firm's goal to provide the best design and livability possible within the neighborhood. He also stated that minor modifications could be considered; however, he stands behind the design approach. He then asked for relief from the condition requiring an eight-foot wide sidewalk on Caballeros. He stated that he would prefer to bring it to 6'6" at some locations to accommodate more landscaping. He also asked for relief from the condition to require removal and replacement of existing pavement with asphalt concrete all along street frontages -he asked that the condition be required through an assessment district for entire neighborhood. He explained that the developer intends to provide turf and trees and automatic watering systems; with an emphasis on trees for shade. He reported that in all cases of CVHC self-help housing, the yard landscape and maintenance is the same or better than surrounding non- CVHC homes. Mr. Patrick Sanderson, neighborhood resident, addressed the Planning Commission to state that he is concerned that the projects will be partially built by the homeowners and that the possibility of lengthy delays to completion could exist. He expressed his wish that the rehabilitation of the neighborhood continue. Chairman Mills stated that all work will be complete on every home before any owner can move in. Mr. Tim Brophy, neighborhood property owner, claimed that he did not receive notice of this public hearing. He also stated that he is in favor of upgrading the neighborhood. He asked that CC&R's address ongoing maintenance and appearance of homes. He added that a neighborhood assessment for sidewalks and curbs would be a burden to neighbors. There being no further appearances, the Public Hearing was closed. Commissioner Klatchko stated that he is pleased with the progress of the project and the response of the applicant to the many suggestions and requests of the Planning Commission at the Study Session level. He stated that the single family residence density is less than could be allowed, but that he appreciates the upgrade to the neighborhood that single family residences will bring. He also stated that the parkway that faces the school and proposed landscaping is consistent with school activity. Director reported that, because this project is a Planned Development, the Planning Commission will get to review final site plans in the future. Engineering staff reported that, regarding the removal and re-paving of the existing street frontages, that the condition includes an "OR" option that allows the applicant to have a soils Page 8 of 10 November 22, 2000 Planning Commission Minutes engineer test and offer alternatives to shore up/strengthen area. She stated that all projects of this type have the same requirement. She stated that the streets have substantial cracking and obviously stressed pavement. She also stated that, regarding the eight-foot bikeway, that the meandering percentage may require additional right-of-way or may use landscape easements which could impact building setbacks. She also stated that any reduction of the eight feet would preclude it from qualifying as a bike path or a sidewalk/bikepath because it would not meet state bikeway requirements. Project architect was called to the podium. He explained that the project is "light self help" which means that the project is 76% built by contractor and 24% by homeowner and that no homeowners may move in until all work is done on all homes. Chairman Mills stated that he would prefer to have a tree in back and/or side yards to soften two-story area when adjacent building is single-story. Commissioner Matthews stated that he felt the project was very tasteful and he encouraged the neighbors to familiarize themselves with the plans. M/S/C (Matthews/Raya 5-0, 2 absent) to approve subject to conditions; and: • Engineering Condition No.30 -Subject to Engineering approval, reduce combination sidewalk/bicycle path to no less than 6 ft. 6 inches to accommodate street trees. • Add a rear or side yard (or where appropriate) tree where two-story units adjoin single- level units. ***** Commissioner Klatchko left the meeting. Case 8.243 -Application by Harlan Laws Corp. for Lowe's Home Improvement Warehouse for a Sign Variance to allow the installation of two main identification signs on Ramon Road, to exceed the allowable square footage for a main identification sign on San Luis Rey, to construct an off-site monument sign on Gene Autry Trail and for a sign program at 5201 East Ramon Road, M-1 Zone, Section 20. Director showed the Planning Commission the exhibits representing the proposed signs for Lowe's Home Improvement Warehouse. He stated that the individual letters are 10'2" tall aluminum channel letters with neon backing that retains all sign hardware within the sign cabinet. He stated it is backlit white with neon to give it glow. He stated that, although the proposed signs are large, the building is very large and they are in scale. He stated that 2'2" tall signs are proposed for over the garden and lumber areas and have the same construction as the main sign. He reported that the monument sign is proposed to be 7'0" at the tallest point, and slope to 6'0" at the sides and that it will have a stucco treatment. He showed the side elevation of the building and the proposed sign to face San Luis Rey which would have letter height of 8'0" (on a thirty foot tall building). He explained that the Gene Autry Trail side of the building is a possible consideration for partnered signage after the vacant adjacent property is developed. He also confirmed that no roof-top signage is proposed. Director pointed out ( ( ( Page 9 of 10 November 22, 2000 Planning Commission Minutes that the proposed monument sign on Ramon Road is smaller than allowed by code. Chairman Mills opened the Public Hearing. Mr. Stan Roble, Harlan Laws Corp, reported that the sign program was begun one year ago with Lowe's and that he is pleased with the outcome. He thanked staff for their help in working within City parameters. He stated that the subframe of the monument will match the building exactly -that the base block will be veneer and have a blue background ceramic tile backing with one-inch push-through letters (which will result in 3/4-inch actual clear acrylic push- throughs). He also reported that this sign program is unique in Lowe's 45-year history in that it will include the first sign that is not face-illuminated. He also reported that the store may open by mid-January or February. There being no further appearances, the Public Hearing was closed. M/S/C (Raya/Matthews 4-0, 3 absent) to approve subject to conditions in staff report. ***** Discussion -Update on Critical Habitat for Peninsular Bighorn Sheep. Director reviewed the November 17, 2000 letter to the US Fish and Wildlife Service from the Mayor which outlines the City's comments and concerns regarding the Draft Economic Analysis of the Critical Habitat Designation for Peninsular Bighorn Sheep. In summary, Director stated, the letter states that, due to the many unanswered questions and unsupported statements, no final designation is appropriate at this time. * * * * * COMMISSION WORK PROGRAM: Director reported that the recent meeting regarding the Gene Autry Trail and Interstate 10 interchange that Commissioner Raya attended was outstanding. He stated that the architect, the planner, and the Public Arts Commissioners , and several others participated which allowed broad design discussions and creative direction. Director reported that the Design Review process is being refined to bring about even more spirited reviews. He stated that when the department is again fully staffed more refinements may be considered. ***** CITY COUNCIL ACTIONS: Director reported that at last night's Study Session, the City Council created a program called the Office of Neighborhood Involvement and Public Participation. He explained that the program will be headquartered in the Office of the City Manager and that the primary liaisons will be Principal Planner Sullivan and himself. He stated that a workshop will be scheduled in ,, ROLL CALL Chris Mills, Chr. CITY OF PALM SPRINGS PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING December 13, 2000, 1 :30 p.m. Council Chambers, City Hall 3200 E. Tahquitz Canyon Way Palm Springs, CA 92262 Present Present This Meeting To Date X 11 Jeffrey Jurasky, V.Chr. X 11 Ralph Raya Jon Shoenberger Philip Klatchko X Jon Caffery* X Mark Matthews X * Arrived at 1 :50 p.m. STAFF PRESENT Doug Evans, Director of Planning & Building Dave Barakian, City Engineer Hope Sullivan, Principal Planner Kim Chafin, Assistant Planner 8 11 10 8 10 Michele Boyd, Planning Administrative Coordinator ***** Chairman Mills called the meeting to order at 1 :35 p.m. ***** FY 00-01 Excused Absences To Date 1 1 4 1 2 4 2 REPORT OF POSTING OF AGENDA: The December 13, 2000 agenda was available for public access at the City Hall exterior bulletin board and the Department of Planning & Building counter by 4:00 p.m., Friday, December 08, 2000. ***** APPROVAL OF MINUTES: M/S/C (Klatchko/Matthews 3-0, 1 abstain, 3 absent) to approve minutes of November 22, 2000 as presented. Page 2 of 11 December 13, 2000 Planning Commission Minutes Chairman Mills opened the meeting to Public Comments. There being no appearances, the Public Hearing was closed. ***** CONSENT AGENDA: Case 5.0760 -Application by Eric Hemstreet for a six-month time extension from the time of final development approval to commencement of substantial construction of Belardo Gardens, an assisted living facility located at the northwest corner of Belardo Road and Sunny Dunes Road, Zone PD 249, Section 22. M/S/C (Matthews/Klatchko 4-0, 3 absent) to approve subject to conditions in staff report. ***** Case 3.1759 -Application by Stan Pollakusky for OMAG Machine Shop for an addition to an existing automotive repair shop at 333 W. Del Sol Road, M-1 Zone, Section 34. M/S/C (Matthews/Klatchko 4-0, 3 absent) to approve subject to conditions that include removal of round window on addition and that a landscape plan be prepared by a landscape professional is to be submitted to staff for review and approval prior to issuance of a building permit. ***** Case 3.1969 -Expansion of the ARFF vehicle parking and ancillary spaces to the existing Airport Fire Station. Chairman Mills abstained due to a conflict of interest. M/S/C (Matthews/Klatchko 3-0, 1 abstention, 3 absent) to approve subject to conditions of approval. ***** Case 3.1918 -Application by Mario Berardi for a new office building at 1960 East Vista Chino Road, P Zone, Section 1. Removed from agenda per applicant request. ***** MISCELLANEOUS: Case 3.1114 -Appeal of the Planning Director's decision by Casitas Arenas HOA for the relocation of fountain equipment and the painting of a wall at 801-881 E. Arenas Road, R-4 Zone, Section 14. Page 3 of 11 December 13, 2000 Planning Commission Minutes Continued from November 22, 2000 Planning Commission meeting. Principal Planner Sullivan reported that the subject wall and fountain equipment were erected without permits. She explained that, in the course of assisting the applicant with permits after code enforcement action was taken for non-permitted structures, the applicant is appealing part of staff's requirements for obtaining permits. She explained that staff directed applicant to paint the wall to match the existing building and that the fountain equipment be moved. Planning Commission called the applicant to the podium. Mr. Richard Carlini, applicant, apologized for making the unpermitted changes; explaining that he did not know permits were required for this work. He stated that the fountain had been in place for approximately 20 years, that the equipment had been moved above ground 8 or 9 years ago, and then relocated to its present location earlier this year for a cost of approximately $500. Commissioner Caffery arrived at the meeting. Mr. Ty Cullen, Casitas Arenas resident, addressed the Planning Commission to state that he has lived in his condominium for 18.5 years. He explained that the entrance to the condominiums is distinguished by the fountain and the circular wall. He further explained that the new wall is made of cement brick and the original wall is made of slump stone. He stated that the color of the wall has always matched the existing building; however, it is now painted bright white. He stated that it was his understanding that the fountain equipment was moved above ground due to plumbing problems. He asked that it be required that the fountain equipment be relocated to an adjacent grassy area and be screened with appropriate landscaping and that the wall be painted. M/S/C (Klatchko/Jurasky 4-0, 1 abstention, 2 absent) to uphold staff's decision. ***** Community Preservation Determination: 645 S. Vista Oro. Placement of flag pole within setback. Director reported that the property owner has requested a Determination from the Planning Commission (as allowed within the Zoning Ordinance) regarding placement of an oversized flagpole within the setback. He stated that this has been brought to the Planning Commission because of a complaint received by the Community Preservation Division and that it is a neighborhood issue. The complaint, he reported, alleges that the flagpole disrupts mountain views of neighbors and is 22 feet tall. He also stated that, because the flag is flown 24 hours per day, it is lit (which is allowed). He also reported that the subject property is very well maintained and that the entire neighborhood has made a dramatic change for the better over the past year. He said this the flagpole may not be as noticeable if it were more toward the house and shortened; however, it would likely still break the approximate 15.5 foot roof line. Chairman Mills called the applicant to the podium. Page 4 of 11 December 13, 2000 Planning Commission Minutes Mrs. Claire Hake addressed the Planning Commission. She distributed a handout that included a photograph of the pole and house, which is on file in the Planning Division. She stated that she has owned the home for 12 years and that the flagpole is meaningful to her in that it was erected as an honor to her late husband, Mr. Richard Hake. She stated that she had no idea a permit was needed for the flagpole. She reported that all but one of her neighbors are in favor of the flagpole remaining where it is. She stated that moving the flagpole would be a problem, due to the large fruit trees in the yard. Ms. Kate Foster, neighborhood resident, addressed the Planning Commission to state that she protests the location and size of the flagpole as it disrupts her view of the mountains and that it is very brightly lit. She distributed a petition signed by 12 neighborhood property owners and additional letters which ask that the flagpole be lowered to 12 feet to be appropriate with the roof line of the house. She further explained that the flagpole's pulley makes annoying clanging noises against the metal pole. Referencing her photograph in the handout, she pointed out the location of the large fruit trees in the yard and suggested that there could be room to move the pole back, which would be helpful to mitigate the height. Commissioner Matthews asked the applicant to return to the podium. Mrs. Hake reported that the flagpole is 21 feet tall and that it was a gift from the American Legion; as her husband was a member. She also reported that the bulb lighting the flagpole is 40-watt and faces her home. Planning Commissioners agreed that they would prefer residents be able to fly United States flags anywhere and at anytime; however, they do understand and appreciate the neighborhood concerns. They encouraged the applicant to work with neighbors to find a compromise. M/S/C (Matthews/Jurasky 4-0, 1 abstention, 2 absent) to continue to the January 10, 2001 Planning Commission meeting. ***** PUBLIC HEARINGS: Case 5.0843 -Application by Friend Development Palm Springs, LLC, for a Conditional Use Permit and Architectural Approval for a 104-unit apartment complex at the southeast corner of East Palm Canyon and Araby Drive, R-3 Zone, Section 25. Continued Public Hearing from November 22, 2000 Planning Commission meeting. Assistant Planner Chafin reviewed the Planning Commission concerns documented at the November 22, 2000 meeting and revisions to the plan since that meeting. She reported that the required number of parking spaces for the project is 170 and that the applicant has applied for a reduction to 154 parking spaces within the gated area. She stated that because 104 of the spaces will be covered carports, a 10% reduction, or 17 spaces, could be allowed. She stated that an additional 40 spaces are shown on the revised plan on the south side of the access road. Page 5 of 11 December 13, 2000 Planning Commission Minutes She reported that the applicant's engineer and the City's engineers have met and thoroughly reviewed the site plan; determining it to be accurate. She explained that two center lines are shown -the "right of way" legally recorded centerline and the centerline of the proposed street improvements or "construction centerline." She reported that the Zoning Ordinance establishes special setbacks for East Palm Canyon Drive and that the code specifically states that setbacks are to be taken from the centerline. She stated that, due to the fact that the code does not require setbacks to be taken from the construction centerline, the setbacks will be measured from the legally recorded centerline. She reported that the project does qualify for a setback reduction. She reviewed an sight line exhibit that addressed privacy issues due to the single-story/two- story combination on the two properties -showing that a six-foot tall person would need to be 105 feet away in order to see over a single-story building to the eave of the roof of the proposed buildings (which are 24'6" high). She further reported that the Park South Homeowners Association proposed several conditions to mitigate their concerns regarding the project and that those conditions have been included in the recommended conditions of approval; including heavy landscaping around the perimeter of the project. She noted that the condominium project is not a gated community; however, the applicant has agreed to place an access gate at the entry to the access road. Regarding the safety of the main intersection to the project, she reported that the Coachella Valley Association of Governments is performing a valley-wide traffic study and that the intersection of Araby Drive and East Palm Canyon Drive will be studied next year. She stated that the sign application will be submitted at a later date. Chairman Mills opened the Public Hearing. Mr. Joe Kennedy, Park South homeowner, addressed the Planning Commission to state that he is concerned with the safety of East Palm Canyon Drive in that area; especially the reduction to fewer lanes in this area. He also stated that he is concerned that the project may not have enough parking spaces and that the density seems too high for this parcel. He stated that his home would be 55 feet from the project. Mr. Arnold Becker, Park South homeowner, addressed the Planning Commission to state that he believes the density of the proposed project is too high. He also asked that the Planning Commission consider the landscaping plan because the proposed 16-foot tall palm trees would not provide privacy. He also stated that he was concerned about the setbacks. Mr. David Gilmore, Park South homeowner, addressed the Planning Commission to state that he is uncomfortable with the proposed land use and noise. He requested that the Planning Commission require a wall of at least eight feet in height to separate the properties. He stated that he also has concerns regarding setbacks and parking. Mr. Hugh Kaptur, project architect, addressed the Planning Commission. In order to respond to concerns from Park South homeowners, he reviewed sight line exhibits explained the planned privacy elements to the project. He stated that the second-story windows on Building #2 that Page 6 of 11 December 13, 2000 Planning Commission Minutes face the condominiums are high bathroom windows located over tubs. He explained that the project proposes a three-foot wide walk (of number two compaction on desert chaff rolled into berms to lower the carport structures which would be a more desirable view from Highway 111 and provide an acoustical barrier); rather than the standard five-foot walk due to the fact that it will receive no regular pedestrian activity. He thanked Assistant Planner Chafin for her comprehensive staff report. Mr. David Gilmore, Park South homeowner, addressed the Planning Commission again to request that the landscape be maintained at a 15-foot buffer. Director stated that the street section requirement along East Palm Canyon Drive is a 1 0' right of way; but that it is recognized that the shape of the parcel and the frontage road make this is a unique situation. He explained the need for a sidewalk and bikeway easement parallel to East Palm Canyon Drive to enable the crossover when/if the bridge is widened at East Palm Canyon Drive. He also stated that, in order to qualify for future grant consideration, the sidewalk and bikeway must meet City standards. He outlined the importance of moving people through a neighborhood with a logical and safe path of travel and how that could be accomplished with the subject easement. He stated that the City's master plan calls for both sides of East Palm Canyon Drive to have a bikeway/sidewalk and that for safety and aesthetic concerns the bike and walkways should not be next to the road. Director reported that the Planning Commission will review the landscaping plan at a later date. Chairman Mills stated that the proposed project's density is appropriate and that the adjacent condominium project was built at a density that is less than would be allowed. He agreed that the proposed project should continue to work at being a good neighbor; however, the shape, zoning, and probable cost of the parcel all support the proposed density. He also noted that this property was previously Phase 2 of the existing adjacent condominium project. He asked the Director to give an example of allowed uses for this lot. Director reported that in this zone (the second highest density in the City) multiple family residences, hotels, apartments, condominiums, child care facilities, country clubs, hospitals and urgent care facilities, and professional office buildings. M/S/C (Matthews/Caffery 5-0, 2 absent) to approve subject to conditions in staff report and: • Amend Engineering condition No. 20 to indicate that the curb face only on the north side of the access road shall be painted red; • Planning condition No. 50 amended to read, "Pursuant to an agreement between the applicant and the Park South Homeowners Association, the applicant shall include on the parcel map an adjustment to grant to the owner of 1842 Araby Drive the portion of the applicant's property currently in use as an outdoor patio at 1842 Araby Drive. • Rooftop air conditioning equipment be studied further by Design Review. * * * * * The meeting was temporarily adjourned for a brief break at 3:30 p.m. The meeting was brought back to order at 3:40 p.m. Page 7 of 11 December 13, 2000 Planning Commission Minutes * * * * * Case 5.0852 -Application by Eagle Rider Palm Springs for a Conditional Use Permit for motorcycle rental at 490 South Indian Canyon Drive, C-2 Zone, Section CBD. Principal Planner Sullivan reported that recent text amendments in the C-1 and C-2 zones allow motorcycle rental subject to three conditions: 1) No fluid service or engine repairs are done, 2) All activity (including driver instruction and check out) be on-site, and 3) all bikes must have stock exhaust systems. She explained that the location on Indian Canyon Drive and Ramon Road was previously a gas station and that the site has not been maintained. She stated that there is ample parking. She stated that the applicant is considering a two-year and eight-month lease with the property owner. She reported that the applicant has recently resurfaced the paved area and is performing some property improvements. She also reported that there will be no outdoor display of merchandise. She referenced several letters regarding the application, some in favor and some opposed. Commissioner Caffery suggested that an extensive landscape plan be developed for the site as well as having the parking spaces restriped. Chairman Mills opened the Public Hearing. Mr. Martin Holister, neighborhood resident, addressed the Planning Commission to state that he only received notice of this public hearing 24-hours ago. He also stated that he felt the proposed business would convey the wrong image of Palm Springs and that any motorcycle makes noise. He speculated that many motorcycles renters would travel west on Ramon Road toward the mountain through residential areas. Mr. Peter Dixson, neighborhood resident, addressed the Planning Commission to also complain that he did not get a timely notification of the public hearing. He said that drag racing and noise are big problems in his neighborhood and that the proposed business would make it worse. He also said that the site is a safety concern. He stated that he has called the Police Department regarding the fact that the speed limit is not often recognized in that area. Ms. Christine Hammond, neighborhood resident and business owner, addressed the Planning Commission to state that she was not notified of the public hearing. She also stated that she, and neighborhood groups, have worked extensively with the City to improve noise issues in the downtown area. She stated that she is surprised that the City would consider this proposed project. She stated that "Bike Weekend" is always a problem for residents and local businesses. She requested that the application be reviewed by neighborhood groups. Mr. Don Sweeto, co-applicant, addressed the Planning Commission to state that he wants to be a part of the community. He stated that the last thing he wants to do is have bad feelings within the community because of his business. He explained that his company is the world's largest renters of Harley Davidson motorcycles. He explained that, in order to comply with Harley Davidson rules, no rental motorcycles can be altered in any way. Because of this, he explained, his customers frequently complain that the motorcycles are not loud enough. He Page 8 of 11 December 13, 2000 Planning Commission Minutes referenced letters submitted to the Planning Commission in favor of his application which are from current neighbors of his shop in San Diego. He stated that rental customers (at his current location on Indian Avenue) are sent toward Joshua Tree National Park or to ldylwild. He encouraged the Planning Commissioners to call the references listed on the letters to learn more about actual daily operations of motorcycle rentals. Mr. Barbara Procker, neighborhood resident, addressed the Planning Commission to state that the proposed location is on a busy street and that crossing Ramon Road at that location could be dangerous. She speculated that renters would travel across to the Heritage Trail. He stated that the noise of the motorcycles would echo off of the mountains. She stated that she felt this application was the wrong use for the location. Mr. Greg Dimitri, neighborhood resident, addressed the Planning Commission to state that there is no such thing as a quite motorcycle and that the location is surrounded on three sides by residential areas. He suggested that there may be better areas for this business, such as near the airport or freeway. He also suggested that, if the application is approved, that use be limited to ten bikes except for special events. Mr. Frank Tysen, President of the Historic Tennis Club District, addressed the Planning Commission to state that he is opposed to the issuance of a Conditional Use Permit for this applicant. He explained that Motorcycle Weekend is a detriment to the neighborhoods and businesses and that he would like the Office of Neighborhood Involvement and Public Participation to review the application. He stated that he felt the economic impact to the City of having the business relocated to the proposed site would be negligible. He stated that the business would have no actual control of where the renters traveled and that the current location of the business seems ideal. He urged the Planning Commission to deny the application. Mr. Martin Holister, neighborhood resident, addressed the Planning Commission to state the subject business would be welcome in many areas that would be more appropriate for the use, but that downtown is not an acceptable location for motorcycle rentals. Mr. Joe Bundura, applicant, addressed the Planning Commission to state that his company is improving the appearance of this location -an abandoned gas station -and that this is a benefit to the City and its residents. He explained that his primary customers are Convention Center customers and Europeans and that most of them travel to Highway 7 4, Highway 62, or to the Salton Sea. He stated that, although his business is open from 9:00 a.m. through 5:00 p.m., the majority of his customers are present between 9:30 a.m. to 10:30 a.m. and from 3:30 p.m. to 4:30 p.m. He stated that he averaged nine bike rentals per week last year. He assured the Planning Commission that his business is a first class operation and is not connected with, or comparable to, Bike Weekend. He stated that it is important for his business to be visible to his customers and thanked the Planning Commission and staff for their time. There being no further appearances, the Public Hearing was closed. Commissioner Klatchko abstained due to a conflict of interest. Director reported that the public hearing notification process includes a notice by the Agua Page 9 of 11 December 13, 2000 Planning Commission Minutes Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians to its lessees and that the City can not control the timing of those notices. He stated; however, that the City will do everything possible in the future to give the Tribe as much notice as possible in order to start its notification process for public hearings. He also stated that, in the future, the Planning Division will send Planning Commission agendas to every neighborhood group president. He also stated that the property is on an Indian Lease which is due to expire within ten years. Commissioner Matthews stated that the subject building is an eyesore and that he would like to see substantial improvements to the property. He stated that he felt there are better locations for this business because, although he enjoys renting motorcycles, the proposed location presents too may concerns for neighborhoods. Commissioner Mills expressed his concern that the public hearing notice was insufficient. Because of this, he recommended that the application be tabled to a January Planning Commission meeting in order to give the applicant time to meet with MainStreet and the Office of Neighborhood Involvement and Public Participation. M/S/C (Caffery/Jurasky 3-1, 1 abstention, 2 absent, Matthews dissenting) to continue to the January 10, 2001 Planning Commission meeting. ***** ARCHITECTURAL APPROVAL: Case 3.1926 -Application by Mr. G's for Toys for facade improvements to property on storefront at 180 North Palm Canyon Drive, CBD Zone, Section 15. Principal Planner Sullivan reported that this application is for facade improvements which include repainting and lighting. She reported that the Historic Site Preservation Board (HSPB) has reviewed the application extensively and agreed on the proposed color and that, because the lighting does not impact the historical building, the HSPB did not endorse or object to the proposed lighting. She further explained that signage is not a part of this application. Mr. Stan Goldenberg, applicant, addressed the Planning Commission to state that his business was previously located in the Fashion Plaza; however, in order to increase walk-in traffic, he relocated to the current location. He stated that the HSPB chose the proposed paint color and that he is willing to have it whatever color the City wants in order to improve the building facade and comply with the HSPB's criteria. Mr. Jesse Cross, Best Signs, was called to the podium to address the proposed neon lighting. He reported that the transformer box will be painted brown to match the rafters and be ceiling- mounted. He stated that there are two options for attracting attention to the business: 1) neon in rafters or 2) three feet back as per sign ordinance and unlimited design opportunities. He also stated that the lights would be red -not yellow. Commissioner Matthews stated that he felt the proposed paint is fine and that the neon lighting is fine. He stated that he recently "discovered" this great toy store. Commissioner Jurasky suggested that the transformer box be positioned inside and Mr. Cross Page 10 of 11 December 13, 2000 Planning Commission Minutes said that it could be done. Commissioner Jurasky also suggested that the connections to the wall be hidden. He stated that there were design issues regarding the lighting that he would like addressed. Chairman Mills stated that he would not like exposed neon at this location. Planner stated that she would research the historical significance of the existing chandeliers. Director suggested that the paint samples suggested by HSPB be applied to a section of the building in order to allow staff, owner, and HSPB assess the proposed color. The Planning Commission agreed. M/S/C (Jurasky/Caffery 5-0, 2 absent) to approve: • Repaint subject to staff approval and Historic Site Preservation Board consent, and approved; • Lighting proposal subject to staff review of the lighting details. ***** COMMISSION WORK PROGRAM: Director reported that the focus of the Planning Division at this time is to provide the highest level of customer service possible given the currently low staffing level and that no work has been done on the work program to report on since the last Planning Commission meeting. CITY COUNCIL ACTIONS: Director reported that at the December 06, 2000 City Council meeting, the Council upheld the Planning Commission's denial of the Freedom Assembly application for a time extension, approved a time extension on the Palm Springs Classic (Coda), approved an expense of up to $15,000 for abatement of the Biltmore Hotel which will be completed within the week, and approved the design for the Interstate 10 and Indian Canyon interchange. Director reported that at tonight's meeting, the City Council will hear an update on the Business Retention Program and will discuss downtown parking issues. COMMISSION/STAFF REPORTS AND REQUESTS: Director reported that, due to a lack of quorum, no Planning Commission meeting will be held on December 27, 2000 and that the next scheduled meeting is January 10, 2001. He reported that interviews for the vacant Principal Planner position have been conducted and there should be a decision this week regarding a finalist. He also reported that recruitment for the Associate Planner position will close at the end of the month. Commissioner Klatchko and Chairman Mills commended Assistant Planner Chafin for her work on the Friend Development application project heard at this meeting. *****