Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1989/11/22 - MINUTES ` PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES Council Chamber, City Hall November 22, 1989 1:30 p.m. ROLL CALL F-Y 1989 - 1990 Present Present Excused Absences Planning Commission This Meeting to Date to Date Larry Lapham, Chairman X 10 0 Gary Olsen 8 2 Barbara Whitney X 10 0 Brent Hough X/ 6 4 Martha Edgmon X 10 0 Chris Mills X 10 0 Michael Dotson X 10 0 Staff Present Marvin D. Roos, Planning Director Douglas Evans, Planner Debra Goodwin, Planner Sherri Abbas, Planner Mary E. Lawler, Recording Secretary Architectural Advisory Committee - November 20, 1989 Brent Hough, Chairman Absent: Will Kleindienst Reuel Young William Johnson Tom Doczi `.. Mike Bucci no Chairman called the meeting to order at 1:30 p.m. M/S/C (Whitney/Edgmon) approving minutes of November 8, 1989, as submitted. REPORT OF POSTING AGENDA: The November 22, 1989 agenda was available for public access at the City Hall exterior bulletin board and the Planning Division Counter by 1:30 p.m. , Friday, November 17, 1989. November 22, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 2 CONSENT ACTION AGENDA Approval of architectural cases is valid for two years. The approval granted must be exercised within that time period unless extended. M/S/C (Whitney/Dotson; Olsen absent) taking the following actions: CASE 3.0692. Application by CHANDULAL PATEL for architectural approval of revised plans for a 56-unit hotel on N. Palm Canyon Drive/Via Escuela, C- 1/R-3 Zones, Section 3. (Commission response to written comments on draft Negative Declaration; no comments received; action.) Removed from the agenda pending receipt of revised plans. CASE 3.0704 (MINOR) . Application by MIKE LYNN for architectural approval of revisions to the exterior of a building (formerly Proprietors) at 844 N. Palm Canyon Drive, C-1 Zone, Section 11. Removed from the agenda pending receipt of revised plans. CASE 5.0469-PD-86A. Application by FALCON LAKE PROPERTIES for architectural approval of final development plans, building design, grading, landscaping, a..� exterior lighting, and irrigation plans for a condominium project located west of Cathedral Canyon Drive, south of the Whitewater River Channel , R-T- P/R-1-C Zone, Section 28. Approved subject to the following conditions: 1. That grade difference adjacent to Unit #49 be resolved with staff. 2. That details on emergency access gate be provided. 3. That trees be kept trimmed 8' - 10' above bikeway. 4. That additional 24" box trees be added to the proposed 15 gallon tree groupings subject to staff review and approval . CASE 3.0676 (MINOR) . Application by CHRIS MILLS for architectural approval of a children's pool and playground equipment at the Wyndham Hotel , 888 E. Tahquitz Way, PD-164, Section 14. Restudy noting the following: 1. That walkway around the pool is too narrow. 2. That relation to large pool area be provided. 3. That details of play equipment be provided. November 22, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 3 CONSENT AGENDA (Continued) CASE 3.0676 (MINOR) . (Continued) 4. That details of any proposed fencing be provided. Abstention: Mills ITEMS REMOVED FROM CONSENT ACTION AGENDA Approval of architectural cases is valid for two years. The approval granted must be exercised within that time period unless extended. CASE 3.0710 (MINOR) . Application by EDWARD DOMANSKIS for architectural approval of hillside tennis court at 815 Panorama Drive, R-1-A Zone, Section 3. Discussion ensued on the location of the tennis court. Planning Director stated that after visiting the property that staff felt the location chosen is the only reasonable one on the steep site. Commissioner Hough stated that additional landscaping if the court which had been discussed at the AAC would obscure the neighbors' views. M/S/C (Hough/Whitney; Olsen absent) approving application subject to the following conditions: 1. That the adjacent homeowners provide feedback on screening between properties, subject to staff approval of final design. 2. That drip irrigation be used on the south and west sides of the tennis court. 3. That all recommendations of the Development Committee be implemented. CASE 3.0713 (MINOR) . Application by DOWNEY SAVINGS AND LOAN for architectural approval of a revised parking layout plan in conjunction with revisions to Smoke Tree Shopping Center, C-D-N Zone, Section 25. Chairman abstained; Commissioner Mills presided. Planning Director stated that there was a large contingent of merchants from Smoketree Shopping Center and Canyon Country Club residents who were meeting on the problem associated with the driveway access and that the Downey Savings representative had not arrived. He suggested that the item be tabled until later in the meeting. November 22, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 4 ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA (Continued) CASE 3.0713 (MINOR) . (Continued) M/S/C (Whitney/Dotson; Olsen absent; Lapham abstained) tabling the item to later in the meeting. ARCHITECTURAL APPROVAL ITEMS Approval of architectural cases is valid for two years. The approval granted must be exercised within that time period unless extended. CASE 3.0702 (MINOR) . Application by MIKE BUCCINO for Smoke Tree Racquet Club for architectural approval of revised parking and entries at 1655 E. Palm Canyon Drive, PD-69, Section 26. Planner (Abbas) presented the redesigned parking layout and stated that the applicant is requesting that the covered parking be placed against the building. Assistant Planning Director stated that the homeowners have installed an island that was not approved (in the original plans) and are requesting one-way ingress and egress; that additional turning movements, if the plan is approved, would create a hazardous situation; that the island should be cut off as originally constructed; that no additional screening was proposed to hide the carports; that the Traffic Engineer recommends strongly that the drive be open and operational as designed originally; that the homeowners ignored city concerns and constructed the island; that the Crepe Myrtle trees along the street lose their leaves in the winter but have a good limb structure; that a stand of shrubs was removed and oleanders planted which the City finds unacceptable; and that landscaping on Sunrise will not completely block off the view of the carports from ground level . Commissioner Dotson stated that landscaping on E. Palm Canyon should not be oleanders, and that the homeowners should substitute some other plant form. Commissioner Mills suggested evergreens as a screen and also to blend in with the existing landscaping. Commissioner Hough stated that the original landscaping had become a jungle, and that a tree other than oleanders would be a better solution to the problem. Chairman suggested a restudy. (M/S/C Mills/Dotson; Olsen absent) approving a restudy noting Commission concerns of unacceptability of the Crepe Myrtle trees on La Verne; removal of the island; and consideration of circulation at the entrance. November 22, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 5 MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS REVIEW. PLANNING COMMISSION review of Architectural Advisory Committee Action Plan. Planning Director stated that staff needed Commission input and endorsement of a proposed action plan for the AAC. After discussion Commission concern was that there is a need to discuss the types of items approved at staff level and also the appeal process since Commissioner Mills felt that all buildings, whether of not on a major thoroughfare, should be reviewed by the AAC and the Planning Commission. M/S/C (Whitney/Mills; Olsen absent) tabling the application for discussion later in the meeting. PUBLIC HEARINGS CASE 5.0526-CUP. Application by PAUL KAMINS for a conditional use permit to convert a single-family residence at 510 Calle Ajo to a professional office, R-2 Zone, Section 23. (This action is categorically exempt from the Environmental Assessment per CEQA guidelines .) Planner (Goodwin) presented the project stating that the applicant questions some of the conditions. Chairman declared the hearing open. Paul Kamins, 248 E. Palo Verde, stated that the recommendation by staff makes the property impossible to use as he intended; that he wants to keep the property the way it is, including the outside appearance, to minimize the impact on the community; that the 10 ft. dedication on Ramon Road should not be required because of the narrowness of the lot and also would hinder sale of the property; that the covenant to relocate the curb and gutter is vague and may force liability on him and place him in an awkward position and cause devaluation of the property; that razing the garage would not allow the storage of records; that using the older homes along Ramon as professional offices would upgrade that street; that removal of the driveway would not allow the area to be used for parking; that backing onto Ramon would not be dangerous because it is red curbed and because Ajo, which is not a major thoroughfare, is the closest street; that providing the required parking of six spaces should not be a problem. He stated that he did not understand the condition to adhere to development Committee conditions. Planning Director explained that the final Engineering conditions have not been received on the project and is the reason a condition regarding Development Committee recommendations was placed on the CUP. November 22, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 6 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) CASE 5.0526-CUP. (Continued) Mr. Kamins stated that he would like conditions to be in the spirit of the City, but that protecting his investment is also important as well as retaining the size of his property. He requested a covenant for providing the right-of-way. Flo London, local realtor, stated that she owned the adjacent property and approved the use of the small houses along Ramon as professional properties since many of them are poorly maintained rental properties; and that a professional use would upgrade the street. There being no further appearances; Chairman declared the hearing closed. Commissioner Dotson asked about accommodation of six cars on the site. Planning Director explained that four parking spaces would include the owners' parking; and that the parking can be designed to accommodate the employees, perhaps through tandem parking, with customers parking behind staff cars. Commissioner Edgmon stated that she felt that leaving the garage intact would have a poor appearance and that a door, of whatever type, will look like a retrofit. Mr. Kamins stated that the intent was not to leave the door but to enclose the end and stucco the wall to match the main structure. Planning Director stated that in an R-2 Zone a masonry wall is required to separate the use from residential property, but that there is a pre- existing wood fence; that the wall could be required on the property line; that the 3% open space deficiency could be alleviated by removal of the driveway and substitution of landscaping; and that dedication reduces the apron to 10 ft. and would force car parking into the right-of-way. Commissioner Mills stated that he liked the use in the area but that the landscaping should be upgraded to current standards; that the Engineering Division will require 6 ft. on the south property line; and that separation of residential property from professional property should be required. Commissioner Whitney stated that she also felt that upgraded landscaping should be required and asked about the number of parking spaces and whether or not the applicant knew the four employees included his own parking. November 22, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 7 i PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) CASE 5.0526-CUP. (Continued) Mr. Kamins remarked that he had thought that parking would be the only problem on the project; that there will be asix person staff since the business is a two partner firm; that limitations on the number of employees is not written in the ordinance; and that he wanted to use the driveway for parking. He asked information on landscaping requirements. Planning Director stated that the quality of design of the landscaping should be defined and upgraded from the present landscaping. He stated that parking could be monitored under the CUP if approved and the owner mandated to control the parking and made aware that the CUP could be revoked if parking becomes a problem. Commissioner Hough stated that the users of the property should not back onto Ramon and demonstrated a different parking arrangement on the board. Commissioner Edgmon remarked that she had concerns about setting a precedent although she was in favor of the use and the upgrade. Commissioner Mills stated that the driveway should be eliminated to stop the problem of backing onto Ramon; that the curb cuts should be left in; that everyone along Ramon has garages on street; that corner properties on Ramon suffer because of the dedication required but it should be given at this time; and that parking spaces could be designed as tandem parking. Commissioner Dotson asked about the six parking space recommendation since the requirement is seven. He stated that approval with only six parking spaces would cause a problem and set a precedent. Commissioner Mills commented that on some of the properties on Ramon there is driveway depth for parking but not in this particular case. M/S/C (Mills/Hough; Olsen absent; Dotson dissented) approving CUP application 5.0526 based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions: Findings• 1. That the conditional use permit application is authorized by the Zoning Ordinance for a professional office in this zoning district (R-2) since the property fronts on Ramon Road. 2. That the site is generally adequate in size and shape to accommodate the proposed use subject to adequate parking being provided. 3. That the proposed use is in conformance with the Zoning Ordinance and General Plan. i November 22, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 8 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) CASE 5.0526-CUP. (Continued) 4. That the proposed professional office, subject to conditions, is not detrimental to the general public health, safety, or welfare. Conditions• 1. That right-of-way be dedicated to bring Ramon Road up to a 100 foot right-of-way. 2. That the existing curb, gutter, and sidewalk improvements shall remain in place except for the installation of a handicap ramp as per Engineering specifications; however, the developer shall enter into a covenant to relocate the curb, gutter, and sidewalk to the ultimate location at the request of the City of Palm Springs Director of Community Development. 3. That the existing block wall remain in place along Ramon Road until the improvments are required. The owner shall enter into a hold harmless agreement relative to all improvements in the public right- of-way adjacent to his property. 4. That the driveway off Ramon Road be removed and the area landscaped. 5. That a minimum of six parking spaces be provided on-site or within 300 feet of the site prior to occupancy of the building. 6. That the use shall be limited to a professional office with no more than four (4) employees on the property. 7. That all other recommendations of the Development Committee be implemented. 8. That a detailed landscape, irrigation, and exterior lighting plan be submitted approved and installed prior to ocupancy of the building. 9. That the garage be allowed to remain and be converted to a non-garage use with architectural changes to be reviewed by staff. Commissioner Hough left the meeting. CASE 5.0525-PD-206. Application by PALM SPRINGS CLASSIC ASSOCIATES for a planned development district to allow a mixed-use destination resort development on 275 acres composed of a destination hotel or hotel complex, a November 22, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 9 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) CASE 5.0525-PD-206. (Continued) commercial/retail/entertainment zone, a championship 18-hole golf course, individual planned development sites for commercial/office and residential uses located south of Vista Chino Road between Gene Autry Trail on the west, the proposed Mid-Valley Parkway alignment on the east, and one mile north of Ramon Road on the south side, W-0-5/W-M-1-P Zones, Section 7. (An Initial Study/Environmental Assessment and Notice of Preparation for an Environmental Impact Report will be considered by the Commission.) . Assistant Planning Director explained that the scope of the project will be defined as the EIR is defined; that R-3 standards would typical on the project; that the hotel. has.1000 roomsi�n one hotel or a series; that standard recreational amenities will be included either on the hotel grounds or designed into the rest of the project; that commerical uses will be established on 50 acres which include theaters, nightclubs, restaurants and an amphitheater (depending on feasibility) ; that the golf course will be a PGA Championship course which is a first for Palm Springs; and that up to 500 dwelling units of varying designs will be constructed. He requested Commission direction on the focus of the EIR, and stated that issues of concern are air resources, water, flood control , and noise impacts from the amphitheater; and that most uses could be allowed under current zoning. He stated that the City's Housing Element will be evaluated to see if mitigation measures would have to be imposed because of the housing needs of service workers for the hotel ; that the transportation and circulation issues are critical regarding relief to surrounding streets ; that comments have been recieved from the Desert Water Agency and the Coachella Valley Archeological Foundation; that staff is working with the Flood Control District to determine the dike location which will dictate alignment of the Mid-Valley Parkway and the configuration of the site; that there is little access to Gene Autry Trail ; that the commercial use will be designed to integrate with the Desert Sun building; that adjustments to the site will be made during the process; that some of the uses may change locations; and that after the review period another public hearing will be held and a final EIR reviewed. Chairman declared the hearing open. Chairman stated that Commission action: is to order the developer to begin the EIR. Assistant Planning Director stated that the City is going to contract for the EIR with an independent consultant firm; that the developer will pay the City; the consultant will be retained by the City with the developer providing information to the consultant; and that the City will hold: the money and that the developer does not deal directly with the EIR process . He stated that the developer will pay the full cost of the EIR and i November 22, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 10 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) CASE 5.0525-PD-206. (Continued) explained that the proposal on the board is a general layout and is what is being approved. Planning Director explained that technically the proposal may not need a General Plan Amendment but the project will affect surrounding properties and a General Plan Amendment will be appropriate to determine the compatibility of surrounding uses and zoning. He stated that staff will determine whether or not a General Plan Amendment is needed and report back to the Commission. M/S/C (Dotson/Mills; Olsen/Hough absent) determining that an EIR is required for the project; that the scope outline by staff be pursued; and a General Plan Amendment study undertaken by staff. Chairman left the meeting. PUBLIC COMMENTS: None ITEMS REMOVED FROM CONSENT ACTION AGENDA Approval of architectural cases is valid for two years. The approval granted must be exercised within that time period unless extended. CASE 3.0713 (MINOR) (Continued) . Application by DOWNEY SAVINGS AND LOAN for architectural approval of a revised parking layout plan in conjunction with revisions to Smoke Tree Shopping Center, C-D-N Zone, Section 25. M/S/C (Edgmon/Whitney; Olsen/Lapham/Hough absent) removing the item from the table. Planner (Abbas) stated that Downey Savings and Loan made an application to revise part of its parking layout; that staff recommends removal of the frontage road in front of Downey consistent with the revised frontage plan for the center to provide better traffic circulation;;:_ that cars will be traveling behind the first tier of buildings instead of on the frontage road; and staff recommends that the driveway at the end of the main aisleway in the shopping center be opened to the Bank of America parking lot and ultimately to Smoketree Lane; that the AAC recommended that the parking spaces for Downey be shifted so that the porte-cochere is centered within the planter; that the AAC felt that the porte-cochere is out of scale with November 22, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 11 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) CASE 3.0713 (MINOR) . (Continued) the pedestrian use although it protects the automated teller machine (ATM) ; and that details of the hardscape around the ATM and a revised landscape plan are to be provided. She stated that the AAC recommended a restudy and that several merchants and property owners were in the audience from Smoketree Village and Canyon Country Club. Planning Director explained that in the 1970's when expansion of Downey and Long's occurred, there was a requirement that in order to maintain an integrated shopping center an integrated plan was required and parking and joint access agreements needed; that this requirement is also a condition of the zone change for Downey and also was placed on the Bank of America; that because of disagreement between two individuals in the two organizations the driveway was not completed; that the requirement should be implemented since a General Plan policy has been to have an integrated shopping center and not a series of strip shopping centers along the highway and that Ralph's Market revisions are being delayed until clearance is received from Downey Savings and Loan. He stated that the property can be zoned out of non-commercial and the center given a 10-year amortization period to eliminate the uses if the requirement is not met; and that the frontage road should be closed to improve traffic circulation at the center. Larry Powell , Vice-president of Downey Savings and Loan, Newport Beach, stated that the architectural application on the agenda is to accommodate a parking problem caused by the design changes to Ralph's parcel which eliminated 14 Downey Savings parking spaces; that the proposed plan would restore 11 parking spaces in an area of importance to Downey customers and operations ; that he had concerns about closing off the frontage road regarding internal circulation and the opening of the driveway to the Bank of America parcel . Planning Director asked the concerns of the applicant on the driveway issue. Mr. Powell replied that the City would be forcing Downey into an agreement with an adjoining property owner who did not keep the previous agreement 13 years ago; that in discussion with the Planning Director both requirements were new to him; and that he was not told by the Planning Director that the requirement would remain on Downey or the application would not have been made. November 22, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 12 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) CASE 3.0713 (MINOR) . (Continued) Commissioner Whitney stated that she lives in the neighborhood and found hazardous circulation conditions around Downey because of the frontage road and the Downey parking situation; that the drive should be open to the Bank of America; that she did not understand why Downey was opposed to opening the driveway to the Bank of America and also she did not understand about the parking problem. Mr. Powell stated that his shopping center subsidary has built many shopping centers and that parking and circulation are concerns; that the expanded market will cause people to utilize spaces in front of the market; that Long's Drug Store needs its parking spaces ; that he wanted to create parking around Downey; that Downey's parking integrity must be maintained; that the ATM drive-up parking will be eliminated; that no parking is being added; that parking is significantly reduced; and that the ATM area will be used for 7 parking stalls and is the reason for eliminating the ATM. Commissioner Dotson asked who is responsible for the driveway opening and asked why the responsible party cannot be force to open the driveway as a condition. Planning Director replied that requiring the driveway to be opened is enforcing the conditions of approval and that the City can also institute rezoning of the property; that the driveway was to have remained open as a condition of approval for the Bank of America but that Downey blocked off Lam,, the driveway and the Bank of America cannot negotiate with Downey; and that underlying property owner has not been able to force the issue either. He stated that the driveway condition was imposed on both Downey and the Bank of America and the condition has not been implemented. Commissioner Whitney asked about how the situation affects Ralph's moving ahead. Art Garcia, Vice-President of real estate for Ralph's Markets, Los Angeles, stated that Ralph's is ready to begin construction but cannot until Downey approves the driveway opening, since approval has to be received from Downey to remove the existing planter and parking spaces to provide a clear driveway. He stated that additional parking is being provided to the rear of the store for employees and Ralphs has agreed to enforce employee parking behind the building with the other tenants so that they do not park in front of the shopping center. y Commissioner Whitney commented that it did not seem that the two parties were adults and asked if Downey were concerned about the number of parking spaces given to them. November 22, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 13 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) CASE 3.0713 (MINOR) . (Continued) Planning Director stated that the shopping center was built when a larger amount of parking was required than presently, and that loss of 14 parking spaces means nothing statistically to the parking was or to the logistics of the center. He stated that the redesignof the parking was originally undertaken because of many safety hazards and conflicts; and that since the redesign, parking lot safety has increased. Mr. Garcia stated that the agreement with Downey is intact if Ralphs satisfies certain conditions and that Downey's consent is needed to begin construction on the Ralph's revisions and expansion. Commissioner Mills asked if Ralph's building permit were linked to the Downey application. Planning Director stated that as far as the City is concerned it is not, but his did not know whether or not approval by Downey is a condition, but that he thought that Ralphs changes were linked to approval to get the changes in the front. Mr. Powell explained that if Downey has approval to add 11 parking spaces, Ralph's has the approval necessary for building permits. He stated that he was not playing games any more than the City was by forcing the opening of the raceway in front of the market; and that the agreement with Ralph's depends on Downey's approval of the parking lot changes for an entire center since Downey is afraid of the impact on parking with the expanded Ralph's. Mr. Garcia stated that the City has a letter from Downey stating that Downey's consent is required before Ralph's can build on the Downey parcel , and the City has taken the position that a building permit cannot be issued to Ralph's until Downey authorizes Ralph's to go on its parcel to make Ralph's revisions. Commissioner Whitney stated that there seems to be an underlying issue and asked the Downey representative why Ralph's is not being given permission to proceed. Mr. Powell explained that prior to the occupancy permit, Ralph's will be required to make modifications to the parking lot and at that point the parking lot will be reduced 14 spaces adjacent to Downey, and Downey is asking that the parking be reinstated. Planning Director recommended that the Commission approve the project subject to AAC conditions since the restudy conditions are not particular November 22, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 14 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) i CASE 3.0713 (MINOR) . (Continued) issues. He stated that the parking layout was not a concern of the AAC and that conditions could be added that the driveway be opened and the frontage road closed and reviewed at staff level . He stated that closing off the frontage road would eventually eliminate access to Downey from the frontage road but would allow access from property to property and that there would be a cross connection to properties using on-site circulation as a workable system. Commissioner Dotson asked about the rear driveway since the Commission had been addressing the midpoint drive. Planning Director replied that the drive in the rear is the matter in which Ralph's has to make minor modifications to Downey property and is a requirement of the plan but not an issue. He stated that Downey agrees to the design but wants to make the parking whole, which is acceptable but that staff is suggesting conditions that make the shopping center whole to resolve the entire issue. M/S/C (Whitney/Edgmon; Olsen/Hough/Lapham absent) approving the application subject to the following conditions: : 1. That the parking spaces be moved on the south side of the building to the center porte-cochere in the proposed planter island. 2. That details of hardscape around ATM be provided. 3. That a revised landscaping plan be provided. 4. That the pedestrian overhang be restudied. 5. That prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall prepare plans for and secure the necessary reciprocal access agreements for a driveway to connect to the property to the east of the subject site and ultimately to Smoketree Lane. 6. That all recommendations of the Development Committee be implemented. 7. fhat the midpoint driveway be opened. 8. That the frontage road be closed. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS REVIEW (Continued) . PLANNING COMMISSION review of Architectural Advisory Committee Action Plan. November 22, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 15 MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS REVIEW. (Continued) Planning Director explained that the only area of concern was the issue of how far to expand staff approval (with AAC member review) , and the issue of possible appeal ; that the Commission could approve the action plan in concept and the implementation on an interim basis with staff to return to the Commission after further review of the two issues. He stated that the action plan would be sent to Council for further comments. M/S/C (Mills/Edgmon; Lapham/Olsen/Hough absent) approving the action plan in concept with staff to report back to Commission with recommendations regarding the appeal process and also directing that implementation begin on interim basis with staff to report back to the Commission also on that issue. DETERMINATION 10.372. Planning Commission determination that a sound stage use is appropriate in the R-3 and R-4 zones under a conditional use permit. Planning Director stated that the Commission can determine that uses similar to other uses in certain zones are allowed; that staff has received a request for a sound stage use which is similar to live radio and TV activities which were taken out of the ordinance because there had not been an application and that the use was originally allowed in the ordinance because of TV station KMIR in the old El Mirador Hotel . He stated that by right-of-zone the use would be limited to industrially zoned areas, but would be compatible in ib a conjunction with a resort hotel II under a CUP. Commissioner Dotson asked if Planning Director was referring to a live performance stage restricted to commercial and movie making. Planning Director re plied that the use would be in an enclosed structure and could have live shows; that the space is acoustically designed for sound recording and performance, but that if the Commission were uncomfortable with the use in a residential zone, it could be placed in other zones. He stated that the use would be reviewed on a case by case basis. I M/S/C (Edgmon/Whitney; Lapham/Hough/Olsen absent) determining that a sound stage use is allowable as an accessory use in conjunction with resort hotel under a CUP in R-3 and R-4 Zones. CITY COUNCIL ACTIONS. Update of City Council actions. i November 22, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 16 MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS (Continued) CITY COUNCIL ACTIONS. (Continued) Downtown Design Plan. Downtown should be marketed according to Mr. Jerde who designed the plan) as an entity with large scale developers to market as an overall concept; juxtaposition of stores to be reviewed. No "theme village". Commitment has to be made by Council to require property owners to upgrade their property and participate in the management plan or proceedings will be initiated under redevelopment laws. The design plan will be shown to the Commission after parts of it have been rewritten. COMMISSION/STAFF REPORTS OR REQUESTS. Downey Savings. Planning Director stated that the problems are between Downey Savings and Ralphs and that the AAC conditions were not specific conditions for a restudy. Downey Savings has to give Ralph's approval to add parking spaces but there is nothing about implementing the plan. Downey can delay Ralphs expansion by not signing the documents. Perhaps delivery area could be modified so that no changes have to be made. Resolution will come from the president of Downey Savings through Mr. Powell , the Downey Savings representative. The tenants want the matter resolved so that more businesses will come into the center. There is also pressure from Canyon Country Club residents. ADDED STARTERS. (Determination of eligibility for consideration.) None. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Chairman adjourned the meeting at 4:15 p.m. PL NN NG IRECTOR MDR/ml PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES Council Chamber, City Hall December 13, 1989 1 :30 p.m. ROLL CALL F-Y 1989 - 1990 Present Present Excused Absences Planning Commission This Meeting to Date to Date Larry Lapham, Chairman X 11 0 Gary Olsen X 9 2 Barbara Whitney - 10 1 Brent Hough X 7 4 Martha Edgmon X 11 0 Chris Mills X 11 0 Michael Dotson X 11 0 Staff Present Marvin D. Roos, Planning Director Siegfried Siefkes , Assistant City Attorney Douglas Evans, Planner Dave Forcucci , Planner Debra Goodwin, Planner Sherri Abbas, Planner Mary E. Lawler, Recording Secretary Architectural Advisory Committee - December 11 , 1989 Brent Hough, Chairman Absent: Tom Doczi . Reuel Young Will Kleindienst Mike Buccino William Johnson Chairman called the meeting to order at 1:30 p.m. M/S/C (Whitney/Edgmon) approving minutes of November 22, 1989, as submitted . REPORT OF POSTING AGENDA: The December 13, 1989 agenda was available for public access at the City Hall exterior bulletin board and the Planning Division Counter by 1 .30 p.m. , Friday, December 8, 1989. •