Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1989/09/13 - MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES Council Chamber, City Hall September 13, 1989 1:30 p.m. ROLL CALL F-Y 1989 - 1990 Present Present Excused Absences Planning Commission This Meeting to Date to Date Larry Lapham, Chairman X 5 0 Gary Olsen X 5 0 Barbara Whitney X 5 0 Brent Hough - 1 4 Martha Edgmon X 5 0 Chris Mills X 5 0 Michael Dotson X 5 0 i Staff Present j Marvin D. Roos, Planning Director Siegfried Siefkes, Assistant City Attorney Debra Goodwin, Planner Sherri Abbas, Planner Dave Forcucci , Planner Dean Lewis, Traffic Engineer Mary E. Lawler, Recording Secretary Architectural Advisory Committee - September 11, 1989 Larry Lapham, Acting Chairman Absent: Brent Hough, Chairman William Johnson Tom Doczi Will Kleindienst Mike Buccino Reuel Young Chairman called the meeting to order at 1:30 p.m. M/S/C (Olsen/Dotson; Hough absent) approving minutes of August 23, 1989 with the following corrections: CASE 5.0421-PD-185 (Desert Hospital expansion) . Page 12. Second Paragraph. Change ' sign" to "site" . Page 17. First paragraph. Change "curb" to "curve" . Commissioner Dotson stated that he was surprised at the finding that the visual impact of the highrise portions is not significant even with reduced setbacks since he had asked for a section on the massing because he felt that massing needed to be addressed. Planning Director stated the finding was not altered from the staff report. REPORT OF POSTING AGENDA: The September 13, 1989 agenda was available for public access at the City Hall exterior bulletin board and the Planning Division Counter by 5:00 p.m. , Friday, September 8, 1989. September 13, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 2 I CONSENT ACTION AGENDA i i Approval of architectural cases is valid for two years. The approval granted must be exercised within that time period unless extended. i i M/S/C (Olsen/Whitney; Hough absent) taking the following actions: i CASE 3.0547. Application by GEORGIO HERRERA for architectural approval of land- scape plans and a wall for a single-family residence on Chino Canyon Drive, R-1-A Zone, Section 3. I Restudy noting the following: 1. Approved subject to staff review of landscaping. 2. Mechanical Equipment and Roofing Changes: Approved as revised with the condition that mechanical screening from above not be required. CASE -3.0596. Application by ANGELVIEW CRIPPLED CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION for archi- tectural approval of a single-family residence for 6 disabled individuals at 2758 Scotia Lane, R-1-C Zone, Section 1. Approved subject to the following conditions: 1. That trees be added in the front yard. 2. That the windows on the north and south elevations be multi-paned, French windows to match the windows on the east and west elevations. 3. That a 30" wall be added in the front along the Vista Chino and Scotia Lane elevations. September 13, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 3 CONSENT AGENDA (Continued) CASE 3.0630. Application by A.R. KEEBLE for architectural approval of revised elevations for a general office/warehouse building on Valdivia Way, M-I-P Zone, Section 7. Restudy noting the following: 1. That the front elevation is weak. 2. That the height difference in the openings be resolved. 3. That the compressors be relocated preferably to the roof and that the parapet screening be adequate. SIGN APPLICATION (CONTINUED) . Application by IMPERIAL SIGN COMPANY for archi- tectural approval of a gas rate sign for PVO Econo Gas Station, 116 N. Sunrise Way, C-1-AA Zone, Section 13. Approved subject to the following conditions: 1. That the cabinet be dark brown. 2. That the sign background be Ivory. 3. That the copy be dark brown. 4. That block be built up to bottom of sign with battered cabinet sides. September 13, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 4 CONSENT AGENDA (Continued) SIGN APPLICATION. Application by STANFORD SIGNS for architectural approval of a new main identification sign for the Travel Lodge, 333 E. Palm Canyon Drive, R-3 Zone, Section 26. Approved subject to the following conditions: 1. That the white background be changed to ivory. 2. That block work surrounding the sign cabinet be lowered. CASE j.0614. Application by MIKE GILBERT for architectural approval of revised landscape plans for a single-family hillside residence on Andreas Hills Drive, R-1-C Zone, Section 1. Approved as submitted. CASE 5.0504-PD-199. Application by M.H. SHASHANI for architectural approval of final development plans for a planned development district to allow con- struction of a 66-unit apartment complex including density bonus on N. Indian Avenue between San Rafael Road/Simms Road, R-2 Zone, Section 2. Approved subject to the following conditions: 1. That all lighting fixtures except the landscaping lights be restudied. 2. That painted metal flashing on the parapet is approved as submitted. Abstentions: Whitney/Lapham. September 13, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 5 CONSENT AGENDA (Continued) CASE 3.0640 (MINOR). Application by JOHN RUPE for architectural approval of a revised exterior color for a hillside, single-family residence at 302 Camino Alturas, R-1-B Zone, Section 27. Approved as submitted. CASE 5.0308-PD-155. Request for by CURT DUNHAM for a twelve-month time extension for a Planned Development District to allow development of single-family hillside lots for sales purposes near South Palm Canyon Drive between Cahuilla Hills Drive/Murray Canyon Drive, R-2/0-20 Zones (I .L.) , Section 34. Approved a 12-month time extension subject to all original conditions of approval . New expiration date will be June 27, 1990. TRIBAL COUNCIL COMMENTS After consideration of the recommendations of the Indian Planning Commis- sion, the Tribal Council recommended that the request for a one-year time extension on PD-155 be approved, subject to previous conditions of approval . September 13, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 6 CONSENT AGENDA (Continued) ITEMS REMOVED FROM CONSENT ACTION AGENDA Approval of architectural cases is valid for two years. The approval granted must be exercised within that time period unless extended. CASE 3.0580. Application by JOHN ARGYROS for architectural approval of land- scape, irrigation and exterior lighting plans for restaurant on Palm Canyon Drive between E1 Alameda/Tachevah Drive, C-1 Zone, Section 10. Planning Director explained that the item was removed from the consent action agenda because staff wanted to discuss screening of roof equipment from all vantage points as required in the Zoning Ordinance; that the equipment on the subject restaurant can be seen from two existing prop- erties and possibly future property development; that the issue could be reviewed later but it is preferable for the design to be done now and that the AAC does not like the ordinance and recommended that the equipment remain unscreened. Planner (Goodwin) explained the project and stated that the parapet would not screen the equipment from all vantage points. Planning Director explained that if the Commission does not support this type of screening, the ordinance should be changed. Chairman stated that the architects on the AAC felt that the equipment has to breath; that enclosure of the equipment causes an impractical imposition on it; and that if covered venting is required, the result will be a massive system on the roof. Planning Director stated that he had seen open metal grids or grills on installations in other cities which did not enclose the equipment but removed its ugly visual impact; that there is an unaesthetic view of rooftop equipment from the Wyndham Hotel , Maxim's and the Marquis; and that the alternative discussed with the AAC was that if the equipment were organized, it could be painted out which is an acceptable way of hiding it and is the rationale for allowing unscreened equipment, not because of lack of expertise in designing it. September 13, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 7 ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA (Continued) CASE 3.0580. (Continued) Commissioner Mills stated that organizing equipment neatly and painting it out is an acceptable means of camouflage; that covered equipment is a problem for maintenance whether or not the screen structure is removable; that mechanical equipment is not necessarily unsightly if the roof plan and equipment are thought out in advance; that a poorly designed system exists on the roof of the Desert Fashion Plaza, which the owner has been trying to camouflage ever since it was built; that roof equipment should be screened from eye level rather than from 1/4 mile which is the present requirement; and that in the subject case it could be addressed in working drawings. He stated that the ordinance would not have to be changed since there is an alternative already in it. Planning Director stated that if the Commission is not opposed to unscreened equipment, the alternative should be deleted and screening at eye level be reinstituted although there will be an unaesthethic view from above; and that staff is having to address mechanical screening problems after the fact which is difficult. Commissioner Olsen requested that the project architect state his opinion. James Cioffi , 700 E. Tahquitz Way, project architect, stated that there are pros and cons to the issue; that a roof plan will be submitted for review in working drawings; that the equipment well is completely full of equip- ment; that the plan is a typical roof plan for a restaurant; that the equipment will not work properly with a screen unless it is a large one- story structure; that cooling towers are not practical on a small building; and that there is a visual problem but in the case of a restaurant, the equipment is impossible to screen from above. September 13, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 8 ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA (Continued) CASE 3.0580. (Continued) Chairman stated that he had to abstain on the case itself but had been part of the Commission discussion on the Zoning Ordinance changes. Commissioner Mills stated that with the alternative the ordinance is acceptable, but is objectionable when it requires screening from above and should be rewritten. M/S/C (Mills/Olsen; Hough absent) to rewrite the ordinance regarding screening of roof mechanical equipment to require the equipment to be screened at eye level but not screened from above. M/S/C (Mills/Whitney; Hough absent; Lapham abstained) approving landscape, irrigation, and exterior lighting plans subject to the following condi- tions: 1. That staff review the landscaping plans. 2. That roof revisions are approved as requested but no mechanical equipment screening is required from above. PUBLIC HEARINGS CASE 5.0515-CUP. Application by DESIGN ASSOCIATES for a conditional use permit to allow auto retail agencies in a commercial building on E1 Cielo Road between E. Tahquitz-McCallum Way/Ramon Road, PD-193, Section 18. (This action is categorically exempt from Environmental assessment per CEQA guidelines.) September 13, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 9 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) CASE 5.0515-CUP. (Continued) Chairman abstained; Vice-Chairman presided. Planner (Forcucci ) stated that the staff originally recommended approval but that there had been concerns raised on the part of the Director of Aviation and the Director of Community Development that car leasing agencies only be approved in zones specifically allowing the use; and that the applicant requested continuance because of these concerns. He presented the staff report, and stated that the parking will have 22 spaces; that the applicants will be required to have an outside maintenance facility for the vehicles; that office space will also be included in the building; and that the number of parking spaces required depends on the size of the rental car operation, and that the 12 spaces that are part of the acceptable exemption in Paragraph 6 din ethen sW tion to the required parking. Commissioner Olsen commended that the use is primarily office space and that the companies do not have an operating agreement with the airport. Chairman declared the hearing open. Bernie Crawford, 1729 E. Palm Canyon, the applicant, stated that he was at a loss over the concerns since he thought the recommendation was for approval ; that he had tried to get an appointment with the Director of Aviation for 10 days but could not; and that the Aviation Director and Director of Community Development decided that they were opposed. He requested a continuance to resolve the problems and stated that Thrifty Car Rental and Executive Car Rental agency representatives were in the audience to. answer questions about specific operations. He stated that the conditions reached with the applicants do not make the use detrimental ; that revenue is derived from the car rentals and airport pick-up; that the City has no more car rental space available at the airport; and that he could not understand why the City is opposed to the use. September 13, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 10 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) CASE 5.0515-CUP. (Continued) Margaret Stoddard, 401 S. E1 Cielo, La Palme condominium complex, stated that she is one of 220 condominium owners who live opposite the proposed rental agency complex; that the amount of traffic caused by car rentals would be much more than the street can handle; that the property owners thought that a restaurant and small shops would be in the complex; that six cars on site will not be enough; that off-site maintenance and shuttle service indicates that that the use is in the wrong zone; that the use would cause more cars and traffic; that the driveway of the building is directly opposite La Palme; and that a barrier might have to be requested by the property owners to avoid conflicts in egress and ingress. There being no further appearances; Chairman declared the hearing closed. Planning Director explained that the Director of Aviation wants to be on record as opposed to allowing car rentals in zones not normally allowing the use because of parking problems which is also the sentiment of the Director of Community Development; and that a continuance is recommended so that the concerns can be resolved. Commissioner Olsen stated that there is no one in the City who has had more experience in dealing with rental agencies than the Director of Aviation and his concerns should be taken into consideration. M/S/C (Whitney/Edgmon; Hough absent; Mills/Lapham abstained) continuing the application to September 27. NB: A petition signed by 92 property owners in La Palme in opposition to the rental car agency use is on file in the Planning Division Office. September 13, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 11 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) CASE 5.0523-CUP. Application by KEHILLAT HA'MIDBAR for a conditional use permit to establish a synagogue in an existing building at 1068 N. Palm Canyon Drive, C-1 Zone, Section 10. (This action is categorically exempt from Environmental assessment per CEQA guidelines.) Planner (Goodwin) gave the report and stated that there had been two favorable responses and a phone call from a property owner who is not in opposition but did not want church parking in front of his building; that the N. Palm Canyon Project Area Committee supports the use provided the appearance of the storefront is compatible with the other buildings in the area; and that the CUP is to be reviewed after a year to determine whether the use is compatible with the surrounding area. Chairman declared the hearing open. Larry Pitts, president of the synagogue, stated that he and the Rabbi were present to answer questions. Louise Hampton, 547 Phillips Road, representing the landlord, stated that the owner has had several tenants previously and is excited about the synagogue as tenants. Vivian Grow, property owner across the street, stated that a medical office is across the street; that she did not wish to speak in opposition to the project but was concerned about parking because the medical building lot only has space for 20 cars but everyone uses the lot even though there is a sign stating that it is for patients only; that the synagogue is only being allowed 10 parking spaces which is not logical if it is a successful synagogue; that Sorrentino's Restaurant has the only other parking in the area and may have concerns also about the parking; and that another parking area should be chosen for the synagogue. September 13, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 12 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) CASE 5.0523-CUP. (Continued) Chairman asked about the hours of the services. Mr. Pitts explained that services will be held on Friday evenings, Saturday mornings and a few additional holy days during the year; that the members are not permitted to drive on holy days or on the Sabbath; that there is a lot behind the building for parking; that Warner Cable will allow the use when the facility is not being used by its employees; that there may be evening and Saturday morning classes with small numbers of people; and that evening services are after office hours. Planning Director stated that required parking is based on seating; that 30 people could be allowed with 10 parking spaces; that the number of people could be limited by the Commission; that the parking will be in off hours from that of Warner Cable; and that with the Warner Cable spaces, which total 26, 78 synagogue members can be allowed. There being no further appearances; Chairman declared the hearing closed. Planning Director stated that as a condition of approval the parking lot should meet ordinance requirements for night lighting since they plan night activities. Vivian Grow (second appearance) stated that the synagogue will have classes that may bring more cars; that parking will be a problem; and that a 10 car lot is not enough. Commissioner Olsen commented that he had concerns about parking problems in the area in general , although he understood the intent of the parking arrangement; that the CUP should be reviewed in a year to determine whether or not the synagogue has outgrown its facility and the parking is therefore deficient; and that a written agreement should be required with Warner Cable for use of its spaces during certain hours. September 13, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 13 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) CASE 5.0523-CUP. (Continued) Chairman asked if a CUP could be reviewed at any time. Assistant City Attorney stated that a CUP can be reviewed if the conditions are being violated but otherwise it is not revokable unless it it was a condition that/was subject to review. it Commissioner Dotson stated that there should be a certain review time instead of empirical '; review. Planning Director stated that a certain review period could be a condition but that in a previous case involving an orthodox synagogue'sparking, the time period was indefinite and there have been no problems; and that the requirement for a review at a time when there is a problem is already included in the conditions. M/S/C (Edgmon/Whitney; Hough absent) approving CUP 5.0523 based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions: Findings: 1. That a conditional use permit application for a synagogue in a C-1 zone is authorized by the Zoning Ordinance. 2. That the site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the pro- posed use. 3. That the proposed church use is necessary for the community and is not detrimental to the general public health, safety or welfare. 4. That North Palm Canyon Drive and Indian Avenue are adequately designed to accommodate any traffic generated by this project. September 13, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 14 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) CASE 5.0523-CUP. (Continued) Conditions• 1. That the Planning Commission may at any time require additional parking based on the empirical needs of the project. 2. That an agreement with Warner Cable T.V. for use of the lot for parking during certain hours be formulated. 3. That the parking lot behind the building (synagogue) meet night lighting standards of the Zoning Ordinance. 4. That the conditional use permit be reviewed for parking sufficiency at the end of a year. PUBLIC COMMENTS - None. ITEMS REMOVED FROM CONSENT ACTION AGENDA Approval of architectural cases is valid for two years. The approval granted must be exercised within that time period unless extended. CASE 3.0565-HOA (MINOR) . Request by ST. TROPEZ VILLAS HOA for reconsideration of denial of landscape modifications for a condominium complex on Alejo Road between Alvarado/El Segundo Roads, R-G-A-8 Zone (I.L. ) , Section 14. Planner (Abbas) stated that the request for reconsideration is the third or fourth one received from the homeowners association at San Tropez Villas; that the Commission has felt that removal of the newly planted Queen Palms and screening with hedges or trees would be the best solution for screening from the Deauville condominiums; that a letter has been September 13, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 15 ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA (Continued) CASE 3.0565-HOA (MINOR) . (Continued) received from the Deauville Homeowners Association stating that the addi- tion of the Queen Palms is an added benefit. She stated that the Queen Palms do not provide screening. Chairman stated that both homeowners associations seem to approve the Queen Palms and have to live with it. Planner stated that trees on the south side of the San Tropez Villas property have been removed; and Queen Palms were planted and that the trees on the inside of the complex are mature and attractive and the addition of the Queen Palms enhances the appearance. Commissioner Mills stated that just because the homeowners association thinks the Queen Palms are acceptable does not mean that the landscaping is good because it is not. Commissioner Whitney asked if Commissioner Mills meant that the letter received from the homeowners association did not represent the people living in Deauville. Commissioner Mills stated that it may not be representative of the units affected. Commissioner Dotson asked about another solution to the regimented sterile Queen Palms, perhaps using existing trees and addition of other materials. Planner stated that the planter is only 3 ft. wide and would require a professional to determine what would grow in this narrow space. M/S/C (Whitney/Edgmon; Olsen abstained; Hough absent; Mills/Dotson dis- sented) approving the existing Queen Palms landscaping as planted on the south edge of the property between St. Tropez Villas and the Deauville condominiums. September 13, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 16 ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA (Continued) CASE 3.0660 (MINOR) . Application by PHILLIP GOLLOB for architectural approval of revised elevations and bedroom additions for a non-conforming apartment building at 2383 Racquet Club Road, R-1-C Zone, Section 1. Planning Director stated that the application was removed from the consent action agenda because of the issue of expansion even in a minor sense of a non-conforming use; that the property was built and conforming in the 50's and became non-conforming in the 70's when the City made the Zoning Map consistent with the General Plan, and all of the multi-zoned properties on Racquet Club, Vista Chino, and Sunrise were made R-1 which left 8 to 9 properties non-conforming and that these were allowed a 30 year amortization period. He stated that the applicants could request rezoning back to the original which would require a General Plan amendment or the buildings could be razed and that staff recommends that the Commission determine whether or not the use can be expanded as a non-conforming use and also that the Commission make clear there is no extension of the use past the year 2003 to amortize the expansion. Planner (Abbas) stated that the applicants want to house lower income seniors; and to meet HUD requirements two units have to be converted into a one bedroom unit, and an additional bedroom added to an existing unit, and a few minor upgrades/made he building. Planning Director stated that the General Plan shows low density residential (4/acre) and that the zoning is R-1-C. Chairman stated that the request by staff is for the applicants to sign an agreement that the upgrade not start a 30-year non-conforming use again. Planner stated that she tried to encourage the AAC to give approval subject to conditions instead of a restudy. I September 13, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 17 ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA (Continued) CASE 3.0660 (MINOR) . (Continued) Planning Director noted that in working with the ordinance and trying to analyze the relationship of the ordinance to the property as non-conforming, there was a discussion with the City Attorney on whether or not there was a non- conforming use or a non-conforming building. He stated that also discussed were the types of residential use and that for example a duplex in a single- family zone would be considered in his opinion as a non-conforming building; that if the use is normal non-conforming the amortization period is 10 years. He stated that the situation had not been addressed before because it was his determination that residential uses in residential zones were not non-conforming uses. He suggested a study session because all the apartment buildings in Section 1 would be non-conforming at the present time, and stated that in his opinion a residential use is a matter of intensity and is a building conformity problem which would allow the longer period of time. Chairman asked if the staff recommendation on the subject project is an amortization period ending in 2003. Planning Director stated that the amortization would be on the building non-conformity which would reaffirm what staff had been using as a policy and that by the year 2003 the lot would have to be single-family resi- dential , the ordinance changed, or the non-4conforming status extended after a public hearing. Wendell Veith, project architect, stated that at staff discussions he thought that a new 30 year amortization period was being discussed because 14 years is not enough time to be economically feasible for refinancing. He asked if there were any way that the amortization period over 30 years could be begun again. Planning Director replied that the ordinance allows for it by a public hearing and the Commission has the authority to extend the time period based on cause. He stated that he would not recommend changing the 30-year amortization based on the proposed work on the project because it September 13, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 18 ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA (Continued) CASE 3.0660 (MINOR) . (Continued) would have to be a significant improvement to the property to extend the time period. Mr. Veith asked if the Commission would take action to restudy the appli- cation and also if the acceptable. concept is table. p Commissioner Olsen stated that he had no problem with the use proposed. Commissioner Mills asked if there were some way to adjust the parking since there it is senior citizen , housing and also/a needs to improve the driveway condition onto Racquet Club; and that deleting two parking spaces might help. Planning Director stated that the parking lot had not been reviewed but if spaces were removed, a planned development district may be the appropriate application but could not be approved because it is inconsistent with the General Plan. He stated that staff would meet with the applicant within the next few days. Commissioner Dotson asked if the project were approved with a 14-year amortization period would it be possible for the applicant to apply for an extension. Planning Director answered that the applicant could and that the Commission can approve or deny the extension under a public hearing. Mr. Veith stated that the parking and the driveway could be adjusted on the plan. M/S/C (Olsen/Whitney; Hough absent) approving the original amortization period until the year 2003 and a restudy of the architecture noting the following: 1. That glu-lam beams are suggested rather than rough sawn wood. September 13, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 19 ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA (Continued) CASE 3.0660 (MINOR). (Continued) 2. That full columns be utilized at the gated entry. 3. That the angle of the columns be reduced. 4. That the parking be reworked to provide for increased landscaping. CASE 5.0516-CUP. Application by ROESCH LINES, INC. for architectural approval of revised elevations for an administrative office/vehicle cleaning/light repair facility on Research Drive between computer Way/Farrell Drive, M-1-P Zone, Section 12. Planner (Abbas) explained that the staff worked with the single elevation on the board and reduced copies at the AAC meeting although the full elevations are now available. Chairman stated that the AAC was concerned about the intersection of the lower roof area and the higher roof area being in the same plane; that the AAC recommended that the band of steel be raised up to the recess and made a darker color; and that ribbing on the building was also discussed. Commissioner Mills stated that M-1-P properties need a better appearance than the subject proposal ; and that most of the buildings in the M-1-P have established a good appearance. He stated that metal buildings can be used if designed properly and that he knew the facility was utilitarian and might not warrant the cost of a/diff y et of building (but that the Commission does not deal with the financing of properties) ; and that the area should maintain its integrity. Chairman stated that the architecture of the building is acceptable, but it is the wrong type of building (pre-fabricated) . September 13, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 20 ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA (Continued) CASE 5.0516-CUP. (Continued) M/S/C (Mills/Edgmon; Hough absent) for a restudy noting that the building should have a more custom appearance and be more compatible with the buildings in the M-1-P Zone. CASE 3.673 (MINOR) . Application by PALM SPRINGS SHADE CO. for McCormick Sandwich Ship for architectural approval of an awning for a business at 233 S. Indian Drive, CBD Zone, Section 15. In reply to Commissioner Mills , Planner (Forcucci ) stated that the canopy does not extend beyond the building and is centered. M/S/C (Mills/Whitney; Hough absent) approving the application subject to the following conditions: 1. That the installation point be lowered to a 7 ft. clearance. 2. That the sign be lowered proportionately. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS LUP. Application by P.S. EXOTIC CAR AUCTIONS for a land use permit to allow a collector car auction at the Radisson Hotel (northeast corner of Vista Chino/N. Indian Avenue) , R-3 Zone, Section 2. Planning Director stated that dates for the auction are October 14 and 15 at the Radisson Hotel which will house the participants; that the con- ference center at the Radisson will be the meeting place; and that the parking lot will be used for the storage of cars. He stated that staff can support the necessary findings and that the hotel occupancy for the weekend is 40% so there should not be overcrowding. September 13, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 21 MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS (Continued) LUP. (Continued) M/S/C (Whitney/Olsen; Hough absent) approving an LUP for a collector car auction at the Radi sson Hotel on October 14 and 15 based on the following findings : 1. That the site has adequate parking for the auction use. 2. That the facility is appropriate for the auction use. Planning Director stated that staff will monitor the parking during the auction. CASE 20.114. Request by RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT for review of a Change of Zone from W-2 to M-M for property located between N. Indian Avenue/Date Palm Drive, north of I-10 (outside of Sphere of Influence) . Planning Director stated that this proposed change of zone is in the area for the proposed /Sphere-of-Influence that the Commission approved recently and sent to City Council ; that the request is M-M (Medium manufacturing); and that staff recommends that a full EIR be prepared on the issues of traffic, air quality, public services (police and fire, particularly) , and housing. He stated that the list of uses allowed is fairly intense and would not be allowed in Palm Springs in the most intense industrial zone. M/S/C (Dotson/Olsen; Hough absent) recommending to Riverside County Planning that an EIR be prepared on the impacts to traffic, air quality, public services and housing of the types of uses proposed. CITY COUNCIL ACTIONS. Update of City Council actions. September 13, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 22 MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS (Continued) - Design Review Process. Council has again requested more Commission input on the architectural review process which will be an agenda item on the Planning Commission study session of September 20. The AAC will be invited. DISCUSSION. Planning Commission discussion of request by PALM SPRINGS CHECK CASHING for a check cashing service at 1063 N. Palm Canyon Drive, C-1 Zone, Section 10. Planning Director stated that because of the location the item should be referred to the North PAC for its input; that there is no check cashing definition in the Zoning Ordinance unless its considered a banking service; that the C-1 Zone is retail business and the list of uses allowed is retail `... oriented; that staff would not encourage the use although it has little experience in this type of sebrvice and that the garishness of the business signage in other cities may/because of lack of sign regulation. He stated that approval could lead to a determination and the matter should first be referred to the North PAC. Commissioner Olsen stated that it is not something he would like to see on the entrance way to the City. David Weisbly, 2940 Alta Loma, the applicant, stated that he operates three other facilities; that the signs in his business are not garish but are lighted can signs saying "Check Cashing" ; that on some of the stores in Los Angeles the signs are garish , and attract a less desirable clientele, but that he has had no problems; that 62% of the population of the United States does not have a checking account and need the service; that he pursued the use at the request of Western Union; and that a check cashing service cashes foreign currency, gives cash advances on credit September 13, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 23 MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS (Continued) DISCUSSION. (Continued) cards, sells money orders, and provides a service to tourists as well as local citizens. He stated that his businesses are attractive and not trashy and that the business would be an asset to the City. Planning Director stated that Mr. Weisbly will be invited to address the j North PAC Committee; there is little parking for the building; eventually parking may be removed from Palm Canyon; that the zone may be acceptable but the building because of lack of parking may not be; and that the application should be continued to October 11 so that the issue can be reviewed by the North PAC. He stated that no action should be taken because the item can be made a determination on the October 11 agenda so that staff can review zones, situations, and circumstances for the use. COMMISSION/STAFF REPORTS OR REQUESTS. - Annual Dinner Meeting with Council . To be held on November 6 at 6:3I1 p.m. in the Josuha Room at the Convention Center. The meeting will be a social affair with other Commissions. (Work type meetings with Council will be scheduled as necessary.) ADDED STARTERS. (Determination of eligibility for consideration. ) None. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Chairman adjourned the meeting at 3:40 p.m. JA- PLANNING DIRECTOR ?1DR/ml PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES Council Chamber, City Hall September 27, 1989 1:30 p.m. ROLL CALL F-Y 1989 - 1990 Present Present Excused Absences Planning Commission This Meeting to Date to Date Larry Lapham, Chairman X 0 6 Gary Olsen X 6 0 Barbara Whitney X 6 0 Brent Hough X 2 4 Martha Edgmon X 6 0 Chris Mills X 6 0 Michael Dotson X 6 0 Staff Present Marvin D. Roos, Planning Director Siegfried Siefkes, Assistant City Attorney Douglas Evans, Planner Debra Goodwin, Planner Sherri Abbas, Planner Dave Forcucci , Planner Dean Lewis, Traffic Engineer Mary E. Lawler, Recording Secretary Architectural Advisory Committee - September 25, 1989 Brent Hough, Chairman Absent: Mike Buccino William Johnson Will Kleindienst Reuel Young Tom Doczi Chairman called the meeting to order at 1:30 p.m. M/S/C (Edgmon/Dotson; Whitney, absent) approving mi �tes of September 13,W ^1`89 with the following corrections: August 23, 1989 Meeting: Page 17. First paragraph. Change "curb" to "curve" . Should refer to Case 5.0516-CUP. September 13, 1989 Meeting: Page 5, Case 5.0308-PD-155. Add "Dotson abstained" . Page 9, Case 5.0515-CUP; second paragraph change "outside maintenance" to "off- site maintenance" . REPORT OF POSTING AGENDA: The September 27, 1989 agenda was available for public access at the City Hall exterior bulletin board and the Planning Division Counter by 5:00 p.m. , Friday, September 22, 1989.