Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1989/08/23 - MINUTES f ` PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES Council Chamber, City Hall August 23, 1989 1:30 p.m. ROLL CALL F-Y 1989 - 1990 Present Present Excused Absences Planning Commission This Meeting to Date to Date Larry Lapham, Chairman X 4 0 Gary Olsen X 4 0 Barbara Whitney X 4 0 Brent Hough - 1 3 Martha Edgmon X 4 0 Chris Mills X 4 0 Michael Dotson X 4 0 Staff Present Marvin D . Roos , Planning Director Siegfried Siefkes, Assistant City Attorney Douglas Evans , Planner Debra Goodwin, Planner Sherri Abbas , Planner Dave Forcucci , Planner Dean Lewis , Traffic Engineer Mary E. Lawler, Recording Secretary Architectural Advisory Committee - August 21, 1989 Larry Lapham, Acting Chairman Absent: �.. William Johnson Brent Hough, Chairman Tom Doczi Reuel YoOng Will Kleindienst Mike Buccino *, * * * * Chairman called the meeting to order ,at 1 :30 ,p.m. /Hough absent M/S/C (Olsen/Edgmon) approving minutes of August 9, 1989 as submitted. * * * * * ADMINISTRATIVE NOTE: There were no Tribal Council comments. * * * * * REPORT OF POSTING AGENDA: The August 23, 1989 agenda was available for public access at the City Hall exterior bulletin board and the Planning Division Counter by 1 :30 p.m., Friday, August 18, 1989. August 23, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 2 i CONSENT ACTION AGENDA Approval of architectural cases is valid for two years. The approval granted �. must be exercised within that time period unless extended. i M/S/C (Olsen/Edgmon; Hough absent) taking the following actions: CASE 5.0459-PD-193 (CONTINUED) . Application by KAPTUR/CIOFFI for architectural approval of revised final development plans for a Planned Development District to allow mixed use resort/commercial including retail office and j food uses on E1 Cielo Road between Tahquitz-McCallum Way/Ramon Road, "P" Zone, Section 18. i Removed from the agenda pending receipt of revised plans . SIGN APPLICATION. Application by IMPERIAL SIGN COMPANY for architectural approval of of a gas rate sign for PVO Econo Gas Station, 116 N. Sunrise, C-1-AA Zone Section 13. Removed from the agenda at staffs request. CASE 3.0207 MINOR. Application by CATHEDRAL CANYON COUNTRY CLUB for architec- tural approval of revised site plans for a 70-unit condominium project Calle at Tecuala/Calle Morelos , PD-86, Section 28. (Reference CASE 5.0065- PD-86.) Approved as submitted . (Plot plan request only-to be reviewed as a tentative map in the future by the Planning Commission.) CASE 3.0543. Application by WILL KLEINDIENST for architectural approval of colors for existing supermarket (Ralph's Market) at Smoketree Center, E. Palm Canyon Drive , C-D-N Zone, Section 25. (Color swatch has been painted on a wall .) Approved as submitted . CASE 3.0626. Application by ROGER MARTIN for architectural approval of revised plans for a 4-unit apartment complex at 1965 S. Camino Real , R-2 Zone, Section 26. Approved subject to the following conditions: 1 . That the applicant submit final landscape plans including decking landscaping and landscaping in front of trash enclosure. 2. That singular courtyard sidewalks be restudied. August 23, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 3 CONSENT AGENDA (Continued) i CASE 3.0656. Application by HENRIETTA J. SHEA for architectural approval of single-family residence at 1034 Andreas Palms Drive North , W-R-1-B Zone , Section 35. Approved subject to the following conditions: 1 . That taller palms (Phoenix Robusta or Filifera) replace the dwarf I palms , in groups of three , minimum of 6 to 12 ft . in height. 2. That cap design on chimney be submitted for staff approval . 3. That all recommendations of the Development Committee be implemented. Abstention: Olsen. TTM 18087. Request by ANDREAS HILLS, INC. for deletion of condition for archi- tectural approval of residence in TTM 18087 on Bogert Trail , W-R-1-B Zone, Sections 35 & 36. Approved removal of architectural approval requirements for all lots except those fronting on Bogert Trail and hillside plots . SIGN APPLICATION. Application by COAST SIGN DISPLAYS for Republic Federal Savings for architectural approval of new identification signs for savings /loan company in Sunrise Square , northwest corner of Vista Chino/Sunrise Way, CDN Zone, Section 2. Approved subject to the following conditions: 1 . That new cabinets be recessed into the existing recessed area of stained glass. 2. That cabinet display logo only. 3. That new lettering be adjacent to logo wall surface and similar to existing signs . CASE 3.0547. Application by ED ANDERHOLT for Georgio Herrera for architectural approval of revised plans for grading, entryway, colors, and tile for single-family residence on Chino Canyon Road, R-1-A Zone, Section 3. Approved subject to condition: That final landscape plans be submitted with wall plans. (August 23, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 4 i CONSENT AGENDA (Continued) CASE 5.0413-CUP - TIME EXTENSION. Application by ROBERT NACKOWSKI for a retro- active 24-month time extension for a CUP for tennis courts on San Joaquin Drive between San Mateo Drive/Alondra Way, R-1-C Zone, Section 19. I Approved subject to the original conditions of approval . New expiration date will be October 8, 1990. ITEMS REMOVED FROM CONSENT ACTION AGENDA Approval of architectural cases is valid for two years. The approval granted must be exercised within that time period unless extended. SIGN APPLICATION (Continued). Application by IMPERIAL SIGN COMPANY for Swifty' s for architectural approval of revised elements of a main identification sign for restaurant (formerly Bakers Square), 411 E. Palm Canyon Drive , R- 3 Zone, Section 26. Planner (Forcucci ) stated that the revised design for the metal cabinet was that recommended by the AAC and the colors are matte black background with Swifty' s in red and diner in white and a yellow lighting bolt; and that the letters will be routed,, out. In reply to Commissioner Dotson' s question, he stated that the Sign Ordinance allows four colors on a sign. Commissioner Dotson stated that although the sign has been approved it is not up to standards and he could not support it. M/S/C (Mills/Whitney; Dotson dissented; Hough absent) approving the appli- cation subject to the following condition: That the sign be no less than three feet below the roof line, and no less than four ft. from the corner of the- wall . CASE 3.0659 (MINOR). Application by FOOK KHEONG CHAN for architectural approval of revisions to exterior and sign program for retail complex (former Copper Square), 266 S. Palm Canyon Drive , CBD Zone, Section 15. Planner (Forcucci ) stated that there are no structural changes; that the design will give the former Copper Square color and life; that there are two new tenants in the building which had been vacant; that the proposed sculpture is hoped to be ai enti cement. Commissioner Olsen requested that a condition be developed that if the applicant wants to change the mobiles they can be changed without Commis- sion review (review by staff or the Public Arts Commission only) . Planner stated that the AAC liked the idea of the sculpture but wanted the Commission to review the building colors. August 23, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 5 �I ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA (Continued) CASE 3.0659 (MINOR). (Continued) Roger Travis , 285 Leonard , project architect, stated that the building faces the wrong way for both traffic and pedestrians and is on a corner with little activity and is a dated dark brown color; that he had visited Idyllwild recently and found a small successful mall resembling the subject complex that was very successful because of kinetics, color, and outdoor display of merchandise; that he wanted to have this feeling in the subject complex; that the sculpture is a subdued color wi th a matte finish in aluminium; that the sculpture is reduced in scale more than the renderings show; that it will be maintained twice a year; and that it would bring activity to the space. He stated that surface of the sculpture will be spray painted over an acrylic primer. Commissioner Whitney stated that she thought the sculpture was attrac- tive. M/S/C (Olsen/Whitney; Hough absent) approving the application subject to the following conditions: 1 . That the walls be white. 2. That the columns and beams be a different lighter color. Submit samples. 3. That the artwork and signs are approved . 4. That the colors be in a subdued color palette that was shown at the Planning Commission meeting of August 23. PUBLIC HEARINGS CASE 5.0421-PD-0185 (Revised) CONTINUED. Application by DESERT HOSPITAL for revised Planned Development District in lieu of a Change of Zone for a hospital master plan and expansion and including highrise structures , parking, and a helicopter pad (on Tachevah Drive) for property on N. Indian Avenue between Tachevah Drive/Paseo El Mirador, R-4 Zone, Section 11. (Commission response to written comments on draft Negative Declaration; action.) Planning Director stated that the Planner assigned the case was not able to attend the meeting; that the plan was . revised; that the project was pre- viously given an Environmental Assessment but a new Environmental Assess- ment was prepared although the impacts are similar except for location as the original Planned Development District; that the Traffic Engineer revised conditions on traffic signalization; that additional letters have been received regarding expansion , notably one from a James Cheatham, an experienced helicopter pilot who was asked to review the location of the helipad by Shane Sales , who lives on Avenida Olivos behind the commercial �,, buildings on Tachevah. He stated that Mr. Cheatham' s letter stated that August 23, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 6 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) CASE 5.0421-PD-0185 (Revised) CONTINUED. (Continued) he feels that the location has problems because the surface level will not be visible from most directions at night due to surrounding buildings; that the location will be subject to turbulence; that the arrival route and approach are impractical and were probably arrived at without pilot con- sultation; that no minimum altitude has been established for the flight over Indian Avenue for arrival ; that because of the steep angle or low height over Indian the turn would be downwind which would be dangerous; that procedures would not be complied with by pilots who will use their best judgement, not the procedure on paper, when transporting a passenger; that the flights will probably overfly other properties; that the close proximity of the sidewalk and the streetis a hazard to the public because of gravel and debris blown on pedestrians at head height; and there is some danger to people in public areas although the 5.5' raised pad helps to mitigate this problem . He stated that Mr. Cheatham suggested moving the helipad to a rooftop becaus existing location is not the best. he Planning Director stated that Mr. Cheatham has much background in the avia- tion field; that staff is recommending a one-year review period for action by the Commission and Council on whether or not there are impacts on the neighborhood and the amount of usage; that the June 28, 1989 conditions still apply; that the pad is for emergency trauma patients only which should be an indication to the hospital , which will spend $100,000 on the helipad , that they cannot abuse the use of the pad or it will be terminated; that the flight pad has to be approved by the FAA; that the guide slope would have to be determined by a body familiar with the types of helicopters using the facility; and in reply to Chairman' s question, that Mr. Cheatham is an aviation consultant hired by Shan Sales on Olivos; that high-rise building and parking structures were other issues although the helipad was the center of the issues in previous hearings . He stated that the revised emergency service area was relocated away from Miraleste and E1 Mirador which was the location on the original plan; that there is a 50 ft. setback on Tachevah; that trees would be removed for curb re-align- ment (a General Plan requirement); that the Traffic Engineer has revised conditions of installation of traffic signals (memo on file in the Planning Division); that Tachevah has always been on the General Plan for 30 years as a secondary thoroughfare and can service the traffic to the emergency areas and that there is no impact on traffic other than what is there now. He stated that the helipad can be terminated if it is not used the way it is conditioned; and that there is 25 ft. to the parking structures as a new condition. He stated that the nearest existing building to the helipad is 100 ft. to the edge of the pad; that he did not know how close future buildings would be to the helipad and showed the location of the nursing towers on the display. He stated next to the helipad is a two story building. Chairman declared the hearing open. Mike Fontana , Vice-President in charge of planning for Desert Hospital , stated that he had no problem with restricting the use of the pad to emer- gency and trauma use and no problems with Commission review after a year of operation of the helipad (30 months from present date); that the condition August 23, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 7 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) „ CASE 5.0421-PD-0185 (Revised) CONTINUED. (Continued) is fair; that the hospital will do a good job; that the hospital is in agreement with the revised traffic requirements; that some conditions will have to be deleted from the Development Committee Conditions since they refer to the original Master Plan andno longer apply as follows: Page 3, VIA MIRALESTE. Improvements related to the east side front lots: (conditions 2, 4, 5, 6, 7) should be deleted since these lots have been deleted from the Master Plan. Page 5. CONDITIONS REGARDING SAFETY STREET LIGHTS. Originally adjacent to the neighborhood should be deleted since they will be relocated because of change of location in the emergency service area (conditions 2 a , b , c and d) . Conditions 4, 5 and 6. Signalization/Miraleste and Tachevah are now in conflict with staff recommendations. He stated that all other conditions are acceptable. Dr. Pat Picchone, 968 Avenida Olivos , stated that the meeting was the third that he had appeared in toprotest and that it seems not to be doing any good because he always loses. He stated that the issue is the school zone; that although Tachevah on the General Plan is supposed to service the traffic generated it was not envisioned as an ambulance and emergency room route and a place for a helipad and to hold auto ingresses and exits one-half block from the school ; that the school children are in danger; the hospital is being obstinate; that the hospital is purchasing Kirk Douglas' land.' to the west across Indian and that the hospital should move emergency services to Indian. Rich Richman, , 1025 Olivos , 150 ft. from the helipad , stated that the heli- pad would impact this area; that the children would be in danger; that traffic now oh Tache-v`ah-.i s minimal ; that school children will walk to classes on Tachevah and walk on field trips along Tachevah; that there is no traffic on Olivos presently but there will be when the street exits into the emergency area and the helipad; that the location for the helipad will impact the neighborhood directly; that there was a special on T.V. recently addressing emergency helicopters which showed the high accident rate among these emergency aircraft; that most communities have curtailed helicopters altogether because of accidents; that once the helipad is built it will remain; that noise generation by helicopters is enormous even if on an occassional basis; that the residents do not want the pad in their neighborhood; that Desert Hospital has a full service airport in close proximity (5 minutes away) by ambulance which most hospitals do not have; that the helipad should be on Indian; that the emergency room entrance will increase vehicle traffic dramatically on Tachevah since the street will be widened; that traffic will travel on Olivos which will make the area a less desirable place to live and dangerous for the residents including children; that he could not understand why the hospital refuses to consider safety issues in the plan because there are real children in the neighborhood and ;,.am-J,,magJ.n,ed number of hikers that the hospital said would benefit from August 23, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 8 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) CASE 5.0421-PD-0185 (Revised) CONTINUED. (Continued) the helipad; that the children are owed more responsibility (The responsi- bility should not be for an imagined person. ) Chairman stated that the ambulances now travel up Indian or down El Mirador. Chris Foster, 943 Olivos , stated that he was opposed to the helipad and emergency room entrances; that the pad should be on a nursing tower; that there could be daily landings; that the hospital promised no parking on Tachevah but painted the curb gray to allow parking in one of its remodels; that the trees should not be destroyed because they are historic; that the situation will be dangerous for children walking on Tachevah Drive because of emergency vehicles and cars; that Olivos is not suited for the traffic; that Mr. Kliendienst who lives on El Mirador was pleased the emergency service area was moved to Tachevah for good reason - because it was moved away from his home on E1 Mirador; that El Mirador should not be closed; that the emergency area should be moved to Indian; that hi s home was bui 1 t in 1937 and he did not envision a branch of the airport in his neighbor- hood . Kip Lyons , 400 S. Farrell , attorney representing Shan Sales , stated that his client continues to oppose the location of the emergency room and the helipad; that Mr. Cheatham' s letter raised a number of questions which have not been addressed such as the altitude of the approach on Indian; that the higher altitude causes difficulty in making a 90 degree turn in a short landing; the approach would be very steep; that a lower approach was more practical but would be at a low altitude on Indian Avenue; that the approach should be farther up on Indian so there would be a more gradual flight path; that the pilots will not be using the plan because of safety concerns; that the rotor dimensions of the largest helicopter (CH53 Marine helicopter) are 40 ft. on each side which totals 80 ft. in diameter; that the distance between the helipad and the building of 150 ft. is too narrow; that the wind and turbulence of the blades are enormous and will raise dust and that the flight path should be restudied now in the planning stage not after the pad is built; that the pad would be difficult to move in a year; that the facility should be planned ahead; that the flight plan is impossible to use because of the north wind; that the future should be planned for and changes made now; that Mr. Sales is concerned because of the location of his house since a southeast fight path would put the heli- copter directly over his house and the other homes in the area; that environmental issues and safety should be reviewed; that the pad should be farther north, not close to a residential area; that recently an emergency helicopter crash in Oregon killed three people and such accidents should be considered; that Mr. Sales is also concerned about the location of the emergency room which/another site , such as Indian Avenue . should have Susan Picchione, 938 Olivos, a 15-year resident of the City, stated that the neighbors promoted expansion of the hospital to the north because the area was very run down at the time; the hospital plans to build emergency services next to an older neighborhood which was built before the El Mirador was built; that the emergency service area is too near a school ; I August 23, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 9 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) CASE 5.0421-PD-0185 (Revised) CONTINUED. (Continued) that additional traffic will be generated; that adding traffic would be senseless; that Indian Avenue does not have a residential area; that the E1 Mirador Tower is gone and only a replica will be built; that the entrances to the emergency area should be on Indian Avenue, including the helipad; that her house is two stories as is the Sales house and Marine helicopters have landed on the streets previously which were closed by the police and these copters are very noisy; that the heliport should be on top of a nursing tower or on Indian; that once the helipad is built it will never be removed and the neighbors will pay the price for it. Dr. Aram Jigarian, 933 Avenida Olivos , stated that he opposed the helipad; that it is not necessary; that there have been 13 landings at the Palm Springs Airport in the 16 months to pick-up patients and that none of the cases were life threatening or serious; that helicopter landings at other hospitals average once a month; that the hospital has to be responsible financially; that the $200,000 cost of maintenance and insurance for a once a month landing to bring someone out of the canyon with a broken leg should be saved and the money spend to reinforce one of the buildings for a landing pad; that the emergency room site is not practical because there are 30,000 patients using the emergency services this year and the numbers are expected to increase; that Tachevah is too narrow to service heavy traffic and should not be enlarged because It- is a residential street; that Indian Avenue should be the place for the entrance since there is an entrance there now; that the change in entrance would not entail, a- great---deal of changing of the plan; that the plan could be reviewed with the hospital planner again; that Palm Springs is a pretty city; that the trees should not be removed to widen the street because they cannot be replaced; that traffic on Olivos will be increased from vehicles using it as a short cut to the hospital ; that the City should not risk running down a neighborhood and degrading its quality; and that the hospital is being stubborn . Rich Richman: (2nd appearance) stated that the Planning Division notifica- tion notifies property owners within 400 ft. but that a vast majority of the neighbors were not notified and that broader range of mailing should be considered. Mike Fontana (rebuttal ) stated that regarding the school situation the new traffic pattern should help the situation because the new entrance will be west of the intersection of Tachevah and Miraleste and that traffic will be removed from Tachevah and Miraleste in the plan which should have a posi- tive impact on the intersection. There being no further appearances; Chairman declared the hearing closed. Dr. Jigarian asked to rebut Mr. Fontana' s remarks but Chairman informed him the public hearing was closed. - August 23, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 10 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) CASE 5.0421-PD-0185 (Revised) CONTINUED. (Continued) In response to Commissioner Whitney, Mr. Fontana stated that the emergency room has to be next to the radiology and surgical departments to accommo- date the patients and doctors; and that non-life threatening emergency patients would be landing at the airport; that the heliport has to be next to the emergency room; that the location at Indian and Tachevah for a heli- pad does not meet glide slope requirements according to an expert from FAA who investigated the location; and that the proper slope can be obtained with the location on Tachevah . Commissioner Whitney asked if the pilots can arbitrarily change the flight path. Mr. Fontana stated that the helipad will be approved by the FFA and the Division of Aeronautics and the flight path will be filed with the Airport Tower as well as the carriers using the pad; that the intent is to keep the helicopters out of the neighborhood and away from obstructions and have the pad approved by the division of aeronautics and to keep the helicopters from circling the neighborhood looking for a landing site. Commissioner Edgmon asked if a broken leg would constitute a trauma . Mr. Fontana stated that it is not the hospital ' s intent to land a patient with a simple broken leg on the helipad and those pati entswoul d be landed at the airport and that only trauma patients needing immediate medical atten- tion would be landed on the helipad. Commissioner Olsen asked if a CH53 Marine helicopter had ever been landed . Mr. Fontana stated that this type of craft had not been landed but was used as a criteria for noise and size because it was the largest and noisiest craft made; that the helipad is 60 ft. in diameter; that the clear zone around the pad is 120 feet in diameter and that the pad is elevated 52 to 6 ft. and that the pad will be secured and aesthetically pleasing and clear of obstructions to protect people from the landing. He stated that the helicopters will be above street level at about 12 ft . at rest and that the curb distance will be defined in construction drawings . Commissioner Olsen commented that dust will', accumulate, on the he'lipad when it is not in use and asked what measures were being taken to keep a dust storm from blowing on Indian Avenue when a helicopter lands . Mr. Fontana stated that the hope was to eliminate the dust totally through a weekly maintenance program and a softscape as a mitigative measure, although it is not known if the problem can be completely eliminated . Commissioner Edgmon asked the danger to walking school children as the time of a helicopter landing. Mr. Fontana stated that he did not think there would be a problem because the street is 88 ft . wide and the school is on the southside of the street and the right-of-way and sidewalk would put the children a distance of 138 ft. from the helipad and that security people could be used to keep children secure on the sidewalk when a helicopter lands . i ' August 23, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 11 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) i CASE 5.0421-PD-0185 (Revised) CONTINUED. (Continued) Commissioner Dotson asked if there has been consideration of the juxtaposi- tioning of the vehicular access from the southwest and the helipad by moving the helipad to the northeast and relocating the area for access back to the helipad thus reversing the functions . Mr. Fontana replied that the heliport is in the middle of the approach driveway now and the MRI scanner, which has a large magnetic field, cannot be close to the pad because it demagnitizes objects and affects instruments and that the helipad should not be behind the E1 Mirador Tower because it is an 80 ft. obstruction in the glide slope and room is needed to lift off and reach Indian Avenue . Commissioner Dotson stated that the MRI is not in that location presently and that the E1 Mirador does not exist any longer. He asked if there were 30,000 emergency patients a year at the hospital . Mr. Fontana stated that the figure is correct. Commissioner Whitney asked if the emergency room on Tachevah would lead to increased traffic and Mr. Fontana replied that the current traffic is using Tachevah and it will be removed from Miraleste and Tachevah because traffic will come from Sunrise and from Farrell . Commissioner Whitney asked about the possibility of the Trauma Center closing because patients cannot afford to pay the costs and Mr. Fontana replied that Palm Springs is a different situation because the trauma center is not in a blighted inter-urban area where the patients are under- insured and thazt/Hospital cans sustain the services of a trauma center. Desert Commissioner Edgmon asked about placing the pad on top of a high rise as Mr. Cheatham suggested and Mr. Fontana stated that the proposed location is open and easy to reach; that regarding pilot consultations on the location the report advocates a safer location (on top of the radiology building) but that he had asked Mr. Cheatham if the proposed location were safe and Mr. Cheatham' s reply was that it was a question of degree (but that he did not say it was an unsafe location). Commissioner Whitney asked why there were not many people in the audience regarding hospital expansion. Planning Director stated that the Public Hearing was continued and was not renoticed in the newspaper; people are on summer vacation; but several have sent letters regarding the helipad and expansion; and the project would be renoticed for the Council hearing on September 20. Commissioner Olsen stated that if the site plan could be /drawn from scratch it would probably would not be designed in its current configuration but that there are existing constraints (buildings) and that the plans cannot be changed much except for placing the helipad on the top of a building, which cannot be done because of budgetary constraints and only one emergency room; that pilots can land at the facility although they may not like to do it; that the hospital will have some control over local Page 12 ' August 23, 1989 PC MINUTES PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued ) CASE 5.0421-PD-0185 (Revised) CONTINUED. (Continued) pilots on the route but military pilots will follow no rule and take what- ever path the pilots decide because they are not interested in the quality of life in the neighborhood. He stated that there is no way to success- fully deal with the helicopter problem since a large huey marine helicopter makes as much noise an top as a building as on the ground; that he did not know whether or not a helipad on to of a building would lessen noise or p but there is another side to the question reduce risks to the neighborhood, in that the number of occurrences will be far less than noise for emergency units from the emergency vehicles being used presently and that if he had his choice between the sirens of the ambulances and the helicopters he would prefer helicopters because they' re less in numbers . Chairman stated that the helipad location and sign configuration will have to be approved by the FAA before the pad is built and operated. Planning Director stated that the location and design are not reviewed by the FAA. Chairman stated that the hospital reviewed the existing facilities and the proposed location was chosen for the best service and the most practical to meet their needs; the hospital will probably 1 i ke to plan a pad away from the neighbors but they cannot do it and the pad will effect the immediate neighborhood but the Commission decision has to be whether or not the trauma center should operate at 100% at the hospital or patients should be landed at the airport. He stated that ambulances also make noise traveling on Miraleste and Tachevah and that he was in favor of the helipad because he saw medivacs save patients during the Korean War. Commissioner Edgmon asked if any consideration had been given to closing off Olivos if the helipad were approved. Planning Director answered that there have been discussions with property owners because of other issues such as vandalism and burglaries in the neighborhood, but that Olivos could remain a public street which could be cul-de-saced; that to make it a private street 100% of the neighbors have to agree and that the residents have not chosen to move forward. He stated that the City could not fund costs for closing the street although the City works with neighborhoods occasionally on community projects . Commissioner Whitney stated that she agreed with Commissioner Olsen and the Chairman but that she could not come to terms with the establishment of a helipad in the neighborhood; that if any of her family had an emergency she could not approve a helicopter flight because of the dangers to someone else' s life and that the area is a residential neighborhood with a school and that she could not support the helipad. Commissioner Dotson stated that he had to reiterate his support for the concept of the helipad; that he had reconciled the helicopter use personally but that he had concerns that the rebuilding of the E1 Mirador that was previously a factor in the concept and for the first time he had �. heard the hospital staff say the existence of the E1 Mirador was a concern i i e 13 - August 23, 1989 PC MINUTES Page PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) CASE 5.0421-PD-0185 (Revised) CONTINUED. (Continued) on the approach path of the helicopters because of its 86 ft. height that a viable hospital is needed but that he was not convinced that the solution reached is creative because there is an area now (El Mirador location) to place the helipad; that the tower can be rebuilt within a year without Commission approval but that if it is a stumbling block to a creative solution for placement of the helipad he could not support the project. He stated that he could understand the concerns of the neighbors on O1 i vos , but there is a sufficient buffer between them and the helipad created by the commercial buildings on Tachevah and the impact is not as great the neighbors perceive. He stated that a restudy could be done of the site; that he did not know whether or not the tower permits have been taken out and that the hospital has locked itself into a design plan that has not been approved by the Commission. Commissioner Edgmon stated that she has concerns about the neighborhood and the school but she was in support of a helipad concept. Chairman stated that the Commission should think about all the people in outlying areasthat the helipad would help. Commissioner Whitney commented that Mr. Fontana had been asked about risking lives by landing patients at the airport and has stated that no lives have been lost in transporting these patients to the hospital from the airport and that it made her question the need for the helipad and the risk to the lives of other people. M/S/C (01sen/Edgmon; Mills abstained; Hough absent; Dotson/Whitney dissented) ordering the filing of a Negative Declaration and approving PD- 185 (Revised) including deletion of the non-pertinent Development Committee Conditions; revision of Traffic Engineering Conditions; and a stringent one-year review of the helipad impact based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions: Findings : 1 . That the hospital expansion program is necessary and desirable for serving the continuing health care needs of the community, is in harmony with the objectives of the General Plan and is not detri- mental to existing uses. 2. That the 26.4-acre site is adequate in size and configuration to accommodate the expansion program and all property development standards in order to adjust the Hospital to the neighborhood . 3. That a planned development district in lieu of a change of zone to "P" is necessary in order to maintain the specialized nature of this hospital campus . 4. That the project is located on Indian Avenue , Tachevah Drive and Via Miraleste, all of which are required to be fully improved in order to carry the type and quantity of traffic generated by the Hospital at August 23, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 14 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) i CASE 5.0421-PD-0185 (Revised) CONTINUED. (Continued) i full buildout with the required mitigation measures .,,The visual impact of the high-rise portions of the Hospital is not significant even with reduced setbacks . i 5. That the establishment of a permanent helipad in the southwest quadrant of the hospital complex will not create any new noise con- flicts with surrounding residential properties . 6. That the proposed conditions are deemed necessary to protect the public health, safety and general welfare of the surrounding com- munity. Conditions• 1 . That the detailed final development plans for each phase or building shall be submitted in accordance with Section 9403.00 and 9404.00 of the Zoning Ordinance as each phase is implemented . 2. That detailed parking plans shall be submitted for approval in accordance with Item 1, above. Parking spaces shall be provided in accordance with Section 9306.00 of the Zoning Ordinance. All parking stalls shall be installed a minimum of 50 feet from the edge of curb return to allow for stacking. ,., 3. That it is intended that Section 9304.00 of the Zoning Ordinance (High-rise Buildings) should be complied with as to height/setback ratios . The point of measure for building height shall be the adjoining curb elevation. After further review and analysis , the right to adjust the required setback. 4. That prior to approval of the final development plans for Phase 1, the Hospital shall demonstrate ownership of all parcels within the boundaries of the Planned Development District. 5. That a preliminary landscape plan shall be submitted. The plan shall show a common landscape these throughout the project and shall serve as a landscape master plan to be used as a guide for preparation of detailed landscape plans . 6. That all Development Committee conditions be implemented including revised signalization requirements set forth in August 28 memo from Traffic Engineering. 7. That all mitigation measures of the Environmental Assessment shall be complied with: a. The provisions of Chapter 70 of the Uniform Building Code blowsand abatement measure, as amended by the City, shall be complied with. b. The helipad shall be used for emergency trauma patients only. A .,• flight operations plan including routing, glide path ratio, height, August 23, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 15 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) CASE 5.0421-PD-0185 (Revised) CONTINUED. (Continued) and location shall be submitted with final development plans and this plan shall receive all necessary approvals from appropriate govern- mental agencies . The helipad operations shall proceed for one year and then be subject to stringent review for continued operation by the City Council at the end of that time on the impacts to the neighborhood, usage , etc. C . As a critical facility, the planning and design of facilities on this site shall take into account the likelihood of an earthquake of magnitude 7.5 on both the San Andreas and San Jacinto faults. d . The parking along the following streets shall be removed to provide adequate capacity for the traffic volume that will be generated by this project: Via Miraleste - Tachevah Drive to Mel Avenue Tachevah Drive - Indian Avenue to Avenida Caballeros Mel Avenue - Indian Avenue to Via Miraleste Avenida Palos Verdes - Paseo El Mirador to Mel Avenue 8. That the open space requirement of 40% for professional complexes shall be required of this project. Areas which contain decorative paving, as well as the E1 Mirador project, may be used to satisfy this requirement. 9. That all recommendations of the Development Committee Conditions of October 5, 1987 as amended be implemented. 10. That all parking areas/structures be set back from the property line a distance of 25 ft . along all street frontages . 11 . That a street tree program be provided . 12. That major pedestrian walkways be defined with trees and/or pergolas . 13. That the parking structure in the northwest corner be reduced in height. NB: This application will be scheduled for City Council hearing on September 20 at 7:30 p.m. in the City Council Chambers , 3200 E. Tahquitz-McCallum Way. CASE 5.0516-CUP. Application by ROESCH LINES INC. for a conditional use permit for administrative office/vehicle cleaning/light repair facility on Research Drive between Computer Way/Farrell Drive, M-1-P Zone, Section 12. August 23, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 16 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) CASE 5.0516-CUP. (Continued) (Commission response to written comments on draft Negative Declaration; no comments received; action .) Planner (Abbas) stated that the application is for a transportation terminal vehicle cleaning facility and light repair facility; the AAC recommended a restudy of the architecture; the staff recommends approval of the CUP with the architecture restudied; that the AAC recommended approval of the site plan; that the location is in the middle of Research Drive; that the applicant does not pick up tour groups or clients , the building is strictly for dispatching of of buses and vans to hotels and the airport to pick- up passengers . Commissioner Mills asked about provisions for employee and bus driver private parking and Planner stated that it is provided behind the gates and that no additional parking will be generated and the facility being used presently has gates . Chairman declared the hearing open. Dick Crane, 3200 Tahquitz, #205, manager of Avis Palm Springs , and former manager of Gr,.ay Lines , stated that the company has operated on Civic Drive for 20 years and has had no problems with the residents; that the new area will be better zoned for the use than a residential zone; and that the facility is only for administration. Ken Smith, California Leisure Consultant Destination Company, stated that he was in favor of the project and that his company provides transportation from hotels to the airport and convention center and promotes Palm Springs; that the type of company is in competition with other warm weather resorts for tourists; that the goals and vitality of Gray,Lin.esis critical to destination management companies and to the City. Randy Roesch, bus line owner, stated he would answer questions . In reply to Commissioner Dotson, he stated that there is a fleet of both vans and buses which are currently in use in the City. There being no further appearances; Chairman declared the hearing closed. Commissioner Olsen asked about the projected signalization date of Tachevah and Traffic Engineer replied there was no firm date. Commissioner Olsen stated that he had a slight concern which would probably fall on the bus company that there will be a problem for slowly turning ', buses coming from the DMV area to Farrell . Traffic Engineer stated that Farrell will be widened to four lanes either inl989or 90 and that with early morning pick-ups there should not be a major problem. i - August 23, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 17 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) CASE 5.0516-CUP. (Continued) Commissioner Dotson stated that it would be safer for the buses for access at Computer Way which is on the curb. He also questioned the "light main- tenance" term since the east elevation appearance is that of a maintenance facility. Mr. Roesch replied that there is no provision in the facility for heavy maintenance of the buses; that the heavy maintenance facility is in San Bernardino; that there is a fuel island near the facility; and that only routine maintenance will performed such as changing tires . Planning Director stated that light maintenance only could be a condition of approval . Commissioner Mills remarked that he was concerned about buses pulling out on Farrell ; that Computer Way would be more visible for traffic traveling northbound on Farrell , which will be surprised when a bus pulls out on Research Drive around the corner. Traffic Engineer stated that the original design of the curve is a problem because of the small 500 ft. radius which should have been 1000 ft.; that two guardrails have been installed because people leave the road on Farrell ; that it is a difficult problem to address because of site restrictions; that the bus employees will have to be oriented regarding the problems . Commissioner Mills commented that farther north there is no bus pulling out and that buses will be using Farrell for their routes because the area is developing. Commissioner Edgmon commented that she makes a difficult turn on Tachevah going north , each morning. Planning Director asked if the Traffic Engineer could state that signaliza- tion of Tachevah,Research, and Farrell would help on ingress and egress; that any use of the property will have similar impacts; that the concern is for the long term broad area changes in the general traffic pattern of Farrell and Computer. Traffic Engineer replied that signalization will help. Chairman commented that a bus driver can see greater distances and potential dangers and also knows the slowness of his bus pulling out and the bus movement will be adjusted. Commissioner Dotson questioned the maximum number of buses on site and Planner replied that there would be ten . Commissioner Dotson stated that conditions should be approved that there will be a maximum of ten buses on site and that no heavy maintenance would be permitted and also that no egress would be permitted on Computer. He also suggested review of the landscaping, especially on the north boundary in the rear of the project. August 23, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 18 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) CASE 5.0516-CUP. (Continued) Planning Director stated that the Development Committee Conditions already limit the number of buses to ten and require an additional 5 ft. planter. He stated that maintenance could be added as a condition and also.%iearess from Computer. Planner stated that AAC recommended approval of the site plan and restudy of the building and Commission Mills stated that a conditions should be it added that the common shared driveway have landscaping at the end. M/S/C (Olsen/Edgmon; Hough absent; Mills dissented) ordering the filing of a Negative Declaration and approving CUP 5.0516 based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions: Findings : 1 . That the proposed charter bus terminal is properly one for which a CUP is authorized by the Zoning Ordinance. 2. That the proposed bus terminal use is in harmony with the General Plan and is not detrimental to the neighborhood. 3. That the site being 1.16 acres in size and irregular ins shape can accommodate the proposed improvements including all yards , setbacks , walls and landscaping. 4. That the site is located near Farrell Drive , which is adequate to handle the anticipated traffic. 5. That the conditions imposed are deemed necessary to protect the public health, safety and general welfare. Conditions: 1 . That the architecture be restudied and approved by the AAC and Commission. 2. That the landscape be restudied at the end of the street and approved by the AAC and Commission. 3. That no heavy maintenance be performed on-site. 4. That all recommendations of the Development Committee date August 14, 1989 be implemented. 5. That all of the mitigation measures of the Environmental Assessment dated August 23, 1989, for Case 5.0516-CUP shall be met. CASE 5.0517-PD-104. Application by CONARD/COLE PARTNERSHIP for a planned `.,., development district to allow construction of a 102-unit board and care August 23, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 19 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) CASE 5.0517-PD-104. (Continued) facility for the elderly on Vista Chino between Sunrise Way/Avenida Caballeros, R-2 Zone, Section 11. (Commission response to written comments on draft Negative Declaration; action.) Recommendation: That the Commission order the filing of a Negative Declaration and approve PD-104. Planner (Goodwin) gave the staff report and stated that AAC reviewed the project and had concerns about the architecture; that the property is large enough to add additional parking; and that the applicant was present to discuss the project. Chairman declared the hearing open. Alan Sanborn, project architect, 600 E. Tahquitz Way, representing the client stated that the client agrees with the recommendations of the AAC; that documentation proves that most of the elderly do not drive cars because the average age for this facility will be 76 years; that the applicants prefer to landscape rather than have a large parking lot; and that a limousine shuttle bus provided for shopping and appointments . Chairman commented that the elderly unfortunately do not have many visitors. Commissioner Dotson asked the designation of a Board and Care Facility and Mr. Sanborn stated that the program proposed was assisted living with no medical or nursing services . Planner stated there would be a central dining room and minimally equipped kitchen in the units and central food preparation. Mr. Sanborn stated also that there is a leisure open space area with benches and trees which could have more indigenous plantings. In reply to Commissioner Olsen, he stated that there will be 10 to 15 employees . Commissioner Olsen commented that 30 or 40 cars would ingress and egress in a shift change . There being no further appearances; Chairman declared the hearing closed. Colors and architecture of the project were discussed. Chairman stated that the AAC found the architecture acceptable and colors on the color board are more representative than those on the renderings . Planner stated that the AAC requested a more accurate color sample and that if the board and care designation were changed to a more intense use and additional parking were needed,the added parking would be required . August 23, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 20 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) CASE 5.0517-PD-104. (Continued) Chairman suggested reducing the parking requirements and adding them at a future date if needed. Planning Director stated that the planned development district is preliminary but the architecture as presented is a final design and would not change substantially and working drawings would not be reviewed again by the Commission unless working drawing review were a condition. Commissioner Mills stated that the project is probably over parked but that the architecture needs restudy since the entry is in the direction of northern prevailing winds which will blow water from the fountain into the building. He suggested a porte-cochere to reduce the water spray problem and stated that the architecture does not reflect the desert. Planning Director stated that there is no true north/south elevation. Commissioner Mills stated that the orientation tends to be predominately north and that the architecture is flat and very uninteresting and that the roof line does not have enough movement and the mansard roof gives the building a cheap apartment type of feeling. He stated that this type of facility on this type of space in the particular location should have more thought and effort put into the architecture. Planner stated that the building is 300 ft. off Vista Chino . Chairman stated that the darker color on the elevations ' is painted stucco. Commissioner Dotson remarked that the architecture should be restudied before action is taken . Commissioner Mills suggested approval of the planned development district with a restudy of the architecture. Planning Director explained that the planned development district would include the use, the basic massing, and the revised architecture could be reviewed by the Commission later. M/S/C (Mills/Dotson; Hough absent) ordering the filing of a Negative Declaration and approving PD-104 based on the following findings and sub- ject to the following conditions: Findings: 1 . That a Planned Development District is the proper application for this project. 2. That the proposed use is a suitable and desirable use for the com- munity. 3. That the proposed use is consistent with the General plan. August 23, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 21 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) CASE 5.0517-PD-104. (Continued) 4. That the size and shape of the site is adequate to accommodate the proposed use. 5. That Vista Chino is adequately designed to accommodate any traffic generated by this project. 6. That the mitigation measures imposed are necessary to protect the public health , safety and general welfare of the community. Conditions: 1 . That all Development Committee conditions dated August 23, 1989, be met. 2. That all conditions of the environmental assessment for Case 5.0517 shall be met. 3. That the architecture be restudied noting the AAC concerns of August 21. CASE 5.0518-CUP. Application by HORST SHOLTZ for a conditional use permit for an addition to an existing restaurant at the Spanish Inn, 640 N. Indian Avenue , north of Granvia Valmonte, R-3 Zone, Section 11 . (This action is categorically exempt from environmental assessment per CEQA guidelines .) Recommendation: That the Commission order the filing of a Negative Declaration and approve-- CUP 5.0518. Planner (Goodwin) gave the staff report and stated that one comment in a letter from a neighboring residents was that Via Chica needed to be cleaned up. Chairman declared the hearing open . Pat Weinburg, applicant, stated that she accepted the conditions and that the area had been cleaned up and old cars removed. She requested that conditions 3 and 4 regarding a required parking lot and sidewalk be deferred since the Spanish Inn does not need the parking spaces presently and deferrment would help financially. Chairman stated that he and Commissioner Olsen were members of the Palm Springs Club and owned 1/85th of the property next door to the Spanish Inn and that Commissioner Whitney's husband also belongs to the Palm Springs Club. He asked if they should all abstain and Assistant City Attorney advised all three to abstain. i August 23, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 22 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) CASE 5.0518-CUP. (Continued ) Assistant City Attorney stated that the public hearing could proceed because enough members /cou)ed counted as present for a quorum. Commissioner Edgmon presided. Commissioner Dotson stated that the current parking is substandard and he felt that parking requirements should not be deleted. He stated that the parking situation on Indian in front of the Spanish Inn is very tight and Traffic Engineer agreed. Planning Director stated that the area is not red curbed in front of the building. In reply to Commissioner Edgmon , Planner stated that the new reception area is on Alta Mira and that patrons would park in the back of the Spanish Inn. She stated that there could be a problem with stacking in the back but there is extra pavement and 11 parking spaces; and that there could be a concern depending on how the valet parking works and�thatthe applicants are not proposing valet parking. Mrs. Weinburg stated that they would have valet parking when it is needed . Planner stated that the primary access is on Alta Mira. Commissioner Mills asked if the parking condition were deleted if the City could require it in six months if necessary. Planning Director replied that there is the same control on conditions on any project, although deferrment of conditions sometimes causes problems when people become uncooperative and that staff generally prefers condi- tions to be in place prior to commencement of operations. Commissioner Mills stated that he was comfortable with a timed CUP which could be revoked in a year if the parking were not provided. He stated that everyone wants the Spanish Inn to be successful and to be upgraded and a one-year CUP could be granted to be extended if the parking were installed and approved by staff. Planning Director stated that that type of CUP would be acceptable unless the applicant's ask for an extension and that the finding made that the site is adequate is accurate per the Zoning Ordinance requirement for intensification of use; and that the parking provided appears to be ade- quate for the facility without impacting other properties or there would have been many phone calls to staff. Commissioner Dotson asked if the use intensifies parking on Indian since parking on that street seems unsafe. Planning Director answered that the parking could be red curbed and even- tually there will be no parking on Indian. He stated that parking on Indian is not being counted in the requirements . • August 23, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 23 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) CASE 5.0518-CUP. (Continued) Commissioner Dotson remarked that a dangerous situation might be encouraged if no more parking is required since the restaurant will be an attraction for people. Planning Director stated that parking needs are being met now and the con- dition is that if there is a problem in the future it will be reviewed. a Assistant City Attorney stated that/CUP is approved for an indefinite time. Traffic Engineer commented that the only area that is red curbed is at the left turn area because it is too narrow for traffic but the rest of the street has been widened although it feels narrow. Planning Director explained that the Commission has a four person quorum and three positive votes are required to make a majority of the quorum and if the vote is 2-1 the CUP will not be approved. Commissioner Mills asked Commissioner Dotson what his concerns were. Commissioner Dotson stated that by approving the CUP without parking, a tight parking situation on Indian Avenue will be encouraged; that the need for the parking will exist; and that a briefer review period would be acceptable to him since a year is through the entire tourist season. He stated that the approval should be approved foir 3 months with the parking installed at that time and another review in 3 months. M/S/C (Mills/Edgmon; Hough absent; Whitney/Lapham/Olsen abstained) approving CUP 5.0518 based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions: Findings• 1. That a conditional use permit application is authorized by the Zoning Ordinance for this type of use. 2. That site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the proposed use. 3. That the proposed use is in conformance with the Zoning Ordinance and General Plan. 4. That the proposed use, subject to conditions recommended, is not detrimental to the general public health , safety or welfare. Conditions• 1. That the restaurant (pool side) be limited to 24 seats and operated between the hours of 8 a.m. and 3 p.m. 2 . That the restaurant (lobby area) "The Living Room" be limited to 49 �., seats and operated between the hours of 5 p.m. to midnight. August 23, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 24 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) CASE 5.0518-CUP. (Continued ) 3. That the parking lot proposed on Gran Via Valmonte to be installed in compliance with Section 9306.00 of the Zoning Ordinance be deferred for 6 months with review in 3 months for problems . 4. That a sidewalk to be provided from the proposed parking lot on Gran Via Valmonte to the existing sidewalk on Indian Avenue be deferred for 6 months . 5. That the existing parking lot on Via Chica be utilized as employee parking and valet parking. 6. That a plan be submitted for a program to upgrade the property along Via Chica within 30 days of approval of the CUP and be completed within an additional 30 days . 7. That all signs require review, approval and separate permits . 8. That within three (3) months of the Conditional Use Permit approval , a review shall be conducted to insure the parking adequacy. 9. That all recommendations of the Development Committee be implemented. PUBLIC COMMENTS - None. ITEMS REMOYED FROM CONSENT ACTION AGENDA Approval of architectural cases is valid for two years. The approval granted must be exercised within that time period unless extended. CASE 3.0614. Application by MIKE GILBERT for architectural approval of a wall for a single-family hillside residence on Andreas Hills Drive, R-1-C Zone, Section 1. Planner Goodwin stated that the architecture was approved with the design of the wall to be reviewed by the Commission and that the AAC recommended approval of the wall and a restudy of the grading plan . She stated that the major concern is the ficus hedge on Andreas Hills Drive. Planning Director stated that he had received a call from the architect, who is out of town; that the house is below the level of the street; that there is no hedge toward the front of the house; that the AAC felt that the ficus would be a green scar. August 23, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 25 ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA (Continued) CASE 3.0614. (Continued) Chairman stated that the elevation on the display board is the best way to landscape the project; that there should not be a soldier coarse of ficus trees because they are too big and too uniform and do not blend with the architecture of the house. Planning Director stated that there was no sidewalk requirement. Commissioner Mills suggested berming and a 4-ft. high shrub as screening from the street. M/S/C (Mills/Olsen; Hough absent) approving the wall design as submitted and a restudy of the landscape to show more compatibility with the building design (plans to be submitted with final grading plan) . CASE 3.0615. Application by JACK BERNABUCCI for architectural approval of a wall for a single-family hillside residence at 1500 Hillview Cove, R-1-C Zone, Section 1. Planner (Goodwin) stated that the AAC approved the landscape plans and the garden walls subject to conditions of restudy of the wrought iron wall . Planning Director explained that the wrought iron wall was to keep children out of the yard and that the landscaping would intermesh with the wrought iron. Chairman commented on the undisturbed long length of the wall (120 ft.) . Commissioner Mills commented that the landscaping will be broken up well in the view towards the site and that from site a 30 inch high wrought iron fence is acceptable (even 4 ft. from the patio) ,and that the final review should be done by staff. M/S/C (Mills/Dotson; Olsen dissented; Hough absent) taking the following actions: 1 . That landscape plans and garden walls are approved. 2. That the wrought iron be reviewed and approved by staff. Commissioner Olsen dissented because the Commission usually takes the advice of the AAC. August 23, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 26 MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS CASE 5.0520-MISC. Initiation by the CITY OF PALM SPRINGS of a Negative �-' Declaration of a Sphere of Influence amendment to add the area generally located north of Interstate 10 from Palm Drive to Verbenia Road comprising approximately 11 square miles . Planner (Abbas) stated that the proposal is an amendment to the Sphere of Influence to place Palm Springs influence across Interstate 10 which removes some of the sphere of Desert Hot Springs and the Cathedral City sphere; that approval of the negative declaration is needed because it is a necessary part of the application to make a Sphere Amendment to LAFCO; and that the amendment involves mostly services to the area. She stated that projects being proposed do not have to be addressed and staff is recommending approval of the negative declaration. She stated that annexation is a more stringent process than a Sphere Amendment. Commissioner Dotson stated that he was in support of the proposal and wanted the sphere to include Snow Creek and Planning Director stated that Snow Creek is currently in the City' s sphere. Planner described the area on the board. M/S/C (Dotson/Olsen; Hough absent) approving a Negative Declaration for a Sphere-of-Influence Amendment to add the area generally north of Interstate 10 from Palm Drive to Verbenia Road comprising approximately 11 square miles . Commissioner Whitney asked if the amendment would give the City more influence on the raceway. Planner answered that this amendment would be north of the freeway and that the raceway is already in the Sphere-of-Influence of the City. SIGN APPLICATION. Application by TRIPLE A SIGNS for Buffums for architectural approval of a sign program for a department store in the Palm Springs Mall , southwest corner of E. Tahquitz-McCallum Way/Farrell Drive, CSC Zone, Section 13. Planner (Forcucci ) stated that Buffum' s in the Palm Springs Mall has applied for four identification signs , 2 at the main entrance of the mall and 2 in the back on the west elevation (repl aces 2 other signs); that the sign is channel lettered and lit from behind by neon (which cannot be seen) and meets all requirements. He stated that the AAC approved the Buffum's sign but restudied the mall sign feeling that it should be under the fascia. Commissioner Whitney left. He stated that the fasciais a clean area and should not be interrupted. August 23, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 27 CONSENT AGENDA (Continued) SIGN APPLICATION. (Continued) Commissioner Dotson remarked that he could support either one independently but that they do not go together and he would like to see a cohesive proposal submitted . Motion was made by Dotson for restudy in order for the applicant to submit a cohesive proposal . The motion died for lack of a second . M/S/C (Mills/Olsen; Whitney/Hough absent) approving 6uffum' s sign as sub- mitted and a restudy of the mall sign per AAC recommendation. MISCELLANE0US ITEMS CASE 11.22 - STREET NAME CHANGE. Request by Planning Staff for a street name change from San Rafael Drive to "Tram Way" for its entire length of N. Palm Canyon Drive to Sunrise Way, Section 2,3, 34 and 35. Planning Director stated that Culver Nichels , a major property owner in the tram area , has requested the name change; that the Tram Way study committee of years ago recommended such a change; and that the Commissioner without property owners signing a petition can change a street name; that there are few addresses now on San Rafael but new projects will be developed which will require addresses soon; that there are two other San Rafael streets within the City. Chairman commented that this change will be confused with Tram View which is only one-fourth mile away from the proposed Tram Way. Commissioner Mills asked if he should abstain since Mr. Nichols is a client and Assistant City Attorney stated that there was no conflict of interest since the City is initiating the change . Chairman stated that he opposed the name change because he liked the name San Rafael . Planning Director stated that he would check on whether or not the case would have to be a public hearing at Council level . M/S/C (Olsen/Mills; Lapham dissented; Hough/Whitney absent) approving a street name change from San Rafael Drive to Tram Way. August 23, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 28 MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS (Continued) ADDED STARTERS. (Determination of eligibility for consideration .) •..� M/S/C Olsen/Mills; Hough Whitney absent) determining that Case 85.170 is eligible for consideration because the need/action arose after the Agenda was prepared. * * * * * for CASE 85.170 (CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE) . Application by ASL CONSULTING ENGINEERS for Newport National Corporation for a certificate of compliance for property on Gene Autry Trail/Tachevah Drive , M-1-P Zone, Section 7. Planner (Evans) stated that the City is involved with the Bird Corporation and the property owner for clearing up legalities on the property and also for financing and that the City could lose money unless action is taken by the Commission; that the parcels have to be recognized as legal ; and that a 1 of 1 i ne adj ustment wi 11 al so be necessary to reconfi gure the north parcel . He stated that the front parcel will be industrial pads , the second parcel will be Bird Corportati on's parcel ; and the third will be open space with the Classic Project. He stated that there is one condition: That there be a 33 ft. access easement to the rear of parcels for legal access which was recommended by the City Engineer and which would comply with the line-up of Tachevah. He stated that there is no access to Gene Autry on the one large parcel which will be subdivided and access restricted at that time. M/S/C (Mills/Olsen; Whitney/Hough absent) approving Case 85.170 subject to the condition that the be 33 ft. easement to the rear parcels for legal access. * * * * * CITY COUNCIL ACTIONS. Update of City Council actions. Downtown Plan. Bob Jani died and issues will have to be resolved regarding the downtown design plan. Staff will check and update position. * * * * * COMMISSION/STAFF REPORTS OR REQUESTS. Avenida Olivos Parking. Planning Director stated that when the medical building PD was approved a condition was that there be no parking on Olivos to keep complexes parking off the street. Toxic Substances Disposal . At Commissioner Dotson' s request, staff will check with Irvine, California on its legislation on banning Cloroflouro- carbon (CFC) use (spray cans , e.g.) . * * * * * ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Chairman adjourned the meeting at 5:00 p.m. PLANNI G D RECTOR MDR/ml l PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES Council Chamber, City Hall • September 13, 1989 1:30 p.m. ROLL CALL F-Y 1989 - 1990 Present Present Excused Absences Planning Commission This Meeting to Date to Date Larry Lapham, Chairman X 5 0 Gary Olsen X 5 0 Barbara Whitney X 5 0 Brent Hough - 1 4 Martha Edgmon X 5 0 Chris Mills X 5 0 Michael Dotson X 5 0 Staff Present Marvin D. Roos , Planning Director Siegfried Siefkes , Assistant City Attorney Debra Goodwin, Planner Sherri Abbas, Planner Dave Forcucci , Planner Dean Lewis, Traffic Engineer Mary E. Lawler, Recording Secretary Architectural Advisory Committee - September 11, 1989 • Larry Lapham, Acting Chairman Absent: Brent Hough, Chairman William Johnson Tom Doczi Will Kleindienst Mike Buccino Reuel Young Chairman called the meeting to order at 1 :30 p.m. M/S/C (Olsen/Dotson; Hough absent) approving minutes of August 23, 1989 with the following corrections: CASE 5.0421-PD-185 (Desert Hospital expansion) . Page 12. Second Paragraph. Change "sign" to "site" . Page 17. First paragraph. Change "curb" to "curve" . Commissioner Dotson stated that he was surprised at the finding that the visual impact of the highrise portions is not significant even with reduced setbacks since he had asked for a section on the massing because he felt that massing needed to be addressed. Planning Director stated the finding was not altered from the staff report. • REPORT OF POSTING AGENDA: The September 13, 1989 agenda was available for public access at the City Hall exterior bulletin board and the Planning Division Counter by 5:00 p.m. , Friday, September 8, 1989,