Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1989/06/28 - MINUTES � . PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES Council Chamber, City Hall June 28, 1989 1:30 p.m. ROLL CALL F-Y 1988 - 1989 Present Present Excused Absences Planning-Comm-iss-ion This Meeting to Date to Date Larry Lapham, Chairman X 22 2 Gary Olsen X 20 4 Barbara Whitney X 19 5 Brent Hough X 22 2 Martha Edgmon - 20 4 Chris Mills X 20 2 Michael Dotson X 21 0 Sta-ff--Present Marvin D. Roos, Planning Director Siegfried Siefkes, Assistant City Attorney Douglas Evans, Planner Debra Goodwin, Planner Richard Patenaude, Planner Sherri Abbas, Planner Dave Forcucci , Planner Dean Lewis, Traffic Engineer Mary E. Lawler, Recording Secr-teary Architectural -Advisory Comm-ittee - June 26, 1989 Brent Hough, Chairman Will Kleindienst William Johnson Mike Buccino Tom Doczi Reuel Young Chairman called the meeting to order at 1:30 p.m. M/S/C (Dotson/Hough; Edgmon Absent) approving minutes of June 14, 1989 with the following correction: Commissioner Edgmon was present (not absent) at the meeting. TRIBAL COUNCIL COMMENTS: During the month of July, the Tribal Council will conduct two Tribal Council Meetings; i .e. , July llth and 25th. The next Regular Tribal Council Meeting will be on September 5, 1989 (There are no Meetings scheduled for August) . John Q. Adams, Tribal Planning Consultant, will be unable to provide comments for cases which may involve Indian Trust Lands and of which may be on the Palm Springs Planning Commission Agenda during the month of August; therefore, we hereby request that all matters affecting Indian Trust Lands be continued until such time as we commence with our regular Tribal Council meetings in September, i 1989. REPORT OF POSTING AGENDA: The June 28, 1989 agenda was available for public access at the City Hall exterior bulletin board and the Planning Division Counter by p.m. , Friday, June 23, 1989. June 28, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 2 CONSENT ACTION AGENDA Approval of architectural cases is valid for two years. The approval granted must be exercised within that time period unless extended. M/S/C (Olsen/Dotson; Edgmon absent) taking the following actions: CASE- 1i0565- (MI-NOR)--Continued. Appl ication by ST. TROPEZ VILLAS HOA for archi- tectural approval of revised landscape plans for a condominium complex on Alejo Road between Alvarado/El Segundo Roads, R-G-A(8) Zone (I .L.) , Section 14. i Continued to July 12, 1989 at the applicant's request. CASE---3 0608---(-M-I-N-R-)---Continued. Application by SUNRISE VILLAGE for architectural approval of entry walls and revised landscaping for a mobilehome complex at 1500 E. San Rafael , PD-116, Section 35. Continued to July 12 pending receipt of revised plans. I I C-ASE----3-:02-7-2. Application by VOSS INVESTMENTS for architectural approval of a revised sign program for a retail/restaurant complex on the northeast corner of Avenida Caballeros/Tahquitz Way, C-1-AA/R-4-VP Zones (I .L.) , Sec- tion 14. I Approved awning color of blue or seafoam green; restudied sign. i j Abstention: Lapham CASE- -3:.0342. Application by TKD ASSOCIATES for Perry Liss for architectural approval of detailed final landscape, irrigation, and exterior lighting plans for a hillside a hillside single-family residence on Camino Del Norte I between Via Monte Vista/Stevens Road, R-1-C Zone, Section 10. Approved as submitted. i CASE----3-:0343. Application by PERRY LISS for architectural approval of detailed final landscape, irrigation, and exterior lighting plans for a hillside single-family residence on Camino Del Norte between Via Monte Vista/Stevens Road, R-1-C Zone, Section 10. Approved as submitted. CASE- 3-:0477. Application by DAVID CHRISTIAN for architectural approval of revised working drawings and revised site plan for Tony Roma's Restaurant, S. Palm Canyon Drive between Ramon Road/Baristo Road, CBD Zone, Section 15. June 28, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 3 CONSENT AGENDA (Continued) CASE---3-;0477. (Continued) Approved subject to the following conditions: 1. That planters on rear of building be maximized. 2. That sacrifice of parking spaces is recommended at pedestrian � p 9 P entrances in order to enhance landscaping areas. I 3. That center island length be reduced to allow a pass through lane. I 4. That other architectural comments from June 12 meeting still apply. CASE----3-i0530. Application by TONY WEST for architectural approval of revised plans for a four-plex at 488 Chuckwalla Road, R-2 Zone, Section 11. Approved subject to the following conditions: 1. That the windows on the left elevation be stacked. 2. That columns under the stairs be provided. 3. That upper windows be centered in bay on front elevation. 4. That all recommendations of the Development Committee be implemented. CASE 3:a531. Application by TONY WEST for architectural approval of revised plans for a four-plex at 567 Chuckwalla Road, R-2 Zone, Section 11. Approved subject to the following conditions: 1. That supports under the overhang of the Via Miraleste elevation be provided. 2. That enhancement be added to the Chuckwalla elevation gateway entries. 3. That approval of an AMM for the reduction of the west setback is recommended. 4. That parking be reconfigured on the Via Miraleste side. 5. That all recommendations of the Development Committee be implemented. June 28, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 4 CONSENT AGENDA (Continued) CASE---3-40559. Application by ROBIN YOUNG for architectural approval of detailed final landscape, irrigation and exterior lighting plans for a single-family residence at 450 Bogert Trail , R-1-B Zone, Section 35. Restudy noting the following: 1. That plants to be installed in front be listed. 2. That canopy trees be included. Add evergreens on side yard. I CAS-E---1,0560. Application by ROBIN YOUNG for architectural approval of detailed landscape, irrigation, and exterior lighting plans for a single-family residence at 300 Bogert Trail , R-1-B Zone, Section 35. i Restudy noting the following: That street trees on Bogert Trail be added. CASE- 1,0561. Application by ROBIN YOUNG for architectural approval of detailed final landscape, irrigation, and exterior lighting plans for a single- family residence at 390 Goldenrod Lane, R-1-B Zone, Section 35. Restudy noting the following: That Eucalyptus shall be a minimum 15 feet on center. CASE-- 3:,0605. Application by ALI NIKSEFAT/LINDA LAPLANTE for architectural approval of hillside single-family residence on the southeast corner of Ramon Road/Fern Canyon Drive, R-1-A Zone, Section 22. Approved subject to the following conditions: 1. That final landscaping plans must be approved by the AAC prior to permit issuance. 2. That all recommendations of the Development Committee be implemented. June 28, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 5 CONSENT AGENDA (Continued) C-ASE---3.0606-- (M-I-NGR) . Application by ROGER TRAVIS for W.J. Bohannan for archi- tectural approval of building elevations and a revised site plan at 4155 E. Palm Canyon Drive, C-2 Zone, Section 30. Approved as submitted. CA-SE---- Application by BOB HOWARD for architectural approval of revised plans for an addition to a single-family hillside residence and complete landscaping at 588 La Mirada, R-1-A Zone, Section 22. Restudy. I CASE- -8-:06-15­-{MI-NOR) . Application by JACK BERNABUCCI for architectural approval of a hillside single-family residence at 1500 Hillview Cove, R-1-C Zone, Section 1. Approved subject to the following conditions: 1. That upper retaining wall is too high and too close to street. 2. That walls and landscaping on Andreas Hills frontage and corner be restudied. 3. That applicant address lowering of elevation of pool/yard area. 4. That all recommendations of the Development Committee be implemented. CASE---3-.0619---(-M1NOR) . Application by PALM SPRINGS SHADE CO. for architectural approval of a revised entrance awning at The Palms, 572 N. Indian Avenue, R-3 Zone, Section 11. Continued to July 12, 1989 at the applicant's request. CASE- --5-:0488-CU-P. Application by CHRIS MILLS for architectural approval of working drawings for an office/service center for Warner Cable TV on Farrell Drive between Tachevah Drive (extended)/Vista Chino, 0-5 Zone, Sec- tion 12. Continued to July 12, 1989 at the applicant's request. June 28, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 6 CONSENT AGENDA (Continued) S-IGN---A-PPL14CATION. Application by QUIEL BROTHERS SIGN COMPANY for Palm Springs Public Storage Company for architectural approval of a revised main identi- fication sign at 1400 S. Gene Autry Trail , M-1 Zone, Section 20. Continued to July 12, 1989 pending receipt of revised plans. SIGN---APPLICATION. Application by BOB CLAUSON for architectural approval of main identification sign for a Texaco Service Station, 610 N. Palm Canyon Drive, C-1 Zone, Section 10. Approved subject to the following conditions: 1. That Texaco logo radius at upper portion of cabinet. 2. That background be matte gray. I 3. That height of balance of sign be reduced. I j I S-IGN---AP-PL-I-C-ATI-GN. Application by IMPERIAL SIGN COMPANY for revisions to main identification sign for Hilton Hotel at 400 E. Tahquitz Way, C-1-AA/R-4-VP Zone (I .L.) , Section 14. Restudy noting the following: 1. That monument be a contrasting color (possibly different material ) . 2. That logo was approved as red. 3. That all other copy remain gold. TIM-E EXTENSI-ON,, -CGAS-E,- 5-.0425-PD-186. Request by PALM SPRINGS MANOR for a 12- month time extension of a Planned Development District for retirement homes/residents hotel for senior citizens at 1500 Baristo Road between Avenida Caballeros/Sunrise Way, R-G-A(8) Zone, Section 14. Approved subject to all original conditions of approval . The new expira- tion date will be August 5, 1990. ITEMS REMOVED FROM CONSENT ACTION AGENDA Approval of architectural cases is valid for two years. The approval granted must be exercised within that time period unless extended. June 28, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 7 CONSENT AGENDA (Continued) CASE---3wO6.14---(-14I-NOR1. Application by MIKE GILBERT for architectural approval of a hillside single-family residence on Andreas Hills Drive, R-1-C Zone, Section 1. Planner (Goodwin) stated that the AAC approved the plan subject to review of the detailed landscape plans and details of the garden wall . Commissioner Dotson commented that he wanted to see the north - south ele- vation. Planner stated that what was shown on the board was a section, not an elevation. i M/S/C (Olsen/Dotson; Edgmon absent) approving the application subject to i the following conditions: I 1. That final landscaping plan be approved by AAC. 2. That elevational details of garden wall be provided on front property line to street elevations relationship. 3. That all recommendations of the Development Committee be implemented. CASE-- 3-:Gf-18 (MINOR) . Application by SILK ROAD RESTAURANT (formerly Sensu) for architectural approval of an revised awning over an existing patio, CBD Zone, Section 15. Planner (Forcucci ) stated that the AAC recommended restudy because of the spindly support posts, although they do match the interior sign program of Zelda's nightclub. Planning Director stated that the awning is being reskinned. Planner stated that there are no other awnings along Indian Avenue that match the proposed ones. M/S/C (Olsen/Whitney; Edgmon absent) restudying the application noting the following: 1. That vertical supports be redesigned. 2. That the fabric, color and awning design are approved. June 28, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 8 CONSENT AGENDA (Continued) CA-S-E- 3-.0627. Application by ARTHUR JAFFEE for architectural approval of patio enclosure at 277 E. Alejo Road (Villa Alejo condominiums) , C-1 Zone (IL) , Section 14. Planner (Goodwin) stated that the AAC recommended that a field trip be taken before action on the case, but that when the committee members called their votes in to staff there was a 2-2 vote; that the homeowners associa- tion approved the proposal ; and that the patio has been converted to a room and requires a building permit. Commissioner Hough stated that the AAC discussed the application and felt that if the conversion could be clear glass, it might be acceptable and that the conversion is the best of the several illegal ones in the complex. Chairman suggested that the homeowners' association design a uniform appli- cation and have homeowners conform to it if they wish to remodel their condos in this way. M/S/C (Olsen/Dotson; Edgmon absent) for a restudy of the application with Commission direction to the homeowners' association to submit a uniform application for all conversions (as a prototype) . SIGN---ARP L-ICATI-ON. Application by ARTHUR BAHN for architectural approval of a new sign program for the Tropicana Liquor-Deli , 830 N. Palm Canyon Drive, C-1 Zone, Section 10. Planner (Forcucci ) stated that the applicants are changing the sign face; that the colors are orange, yellow, and green copy on black which is dup- licated on the reverse of the sign; and that the location is in the former Jurgensen's Market building. Chairman asked why the case was removed from the consent agenda since it was approved by the AAC. Planner stated that the Commission should review the colors; that the sign was installed without a permit; that the building was painted also without permit, although it has since been repainted. Representative from Tropicana stated that he was on vacation when the the sign was installed; and is a light orange; that the sign is noticed by passengers in cars because of the color; and that the neighbors like the scheme. He requested that the sign remain. Commissioner Hough suggested that the Commissioners drive by and look at the sign before action is taken. Commissioner Whitney agreed. Commissioner Dotson stated that the sign should be restudied and is offen- sive on Indian Avenue. June 28, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 9 CONSENT AGENDA (Continued) S-IGN--APRL--ICATION. (Continued) Commissioner Olsen commented that the Commission has allowed latitude in sign colors and that some of the new signs are interesting but that this sign is beyond the latitude of the Commission. Commissioner Hough stated that the applicant is reskinning an existing sign; is not changing the box. I Tropicana representative asked that the sign remain for two days for Com- mission review. M/S/C (Dotson/Olsen; Edgmon absent; Whitney dissented) for a restudy of the colors and composition of the sign. i PUBLIC HEARINGS CASE -5-.0514-CUP. Application by GEORGE GUND for a conditional use permit for a night lighted, recessed tennis court on Camino Mirasol between Camino Norte/Via Las Palmas, R-1-A Zone, Section 10. (This action is categorically exempt from Environmental assessment per CEQA guidelines. ) Recommendation: That the Commission approve the application subject to :.a conditions. Planner (Abbas) stated that the application is for a recessed, night- lighted tennis court; that the light standards conform to the new night lighting ordinance requirements of 16 ft. above the playing surface; that a small home will be built which is not subject to architectural review and which will be expanded in the future; that the applicant lives close to the proposed court; and that phone calls from the neighbors have been positive. Chairman declared the hearing open. Nick Smith, 1186 San Joaquin, stated that the applicant is enroute to Moscow and that he worked for him; that Mr. Gund lives in San Francisco and comes to Palm Springs once a month; that the court is only for his use; that the house will be expanded into an estate type of residence; that the court will be adjacent to a neighbor's court; and that a small pool in the back will be screened. Tom Doczi , TKD Associates, 980 Tahquitz Way, landscape architect, stated that the court will be recessed below grade and is adjacent to another court; that there is a 12 to 15 ft. Oleander hedge; and that there is an Avacado grove on the west which will screen the lights. June 28, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 10 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) CASE- 5-iO5.14-CUP. (Continued) Commissioner Dotson asked if there were requirements for a house to be built with a tennis court. He stated that the footprint of the building appears to intrude into the court. Commissioner Hough explained that the reason the line disturbed the tennis court is because the applicant is saving space for the larger future resi- dence. Planner explained that the corners of the tennis court were removed so the court fits the lot. Commissioner Dotson asked if the court and house have to be developed at the same time. Chairman stated that the Zoning Ordinance does not require that a tennis court have a residence with it and that the applicant will build a house. Assistant City Attorney stated that in the Zoning Ordinance tennis courts are an accessory use to a single-family residence and if only the tennis court is built it becomes a primary use which is not allowed in R-1 Zones. Planner explained that two lots will be combined as a condition of approval . Commissioner Dotson stated that the tennis court is not designed properly (except for hackers) because the corners are needed for play. M/S/C (Hough/Whitney; Edgmon/Mills absent; Dotson dissented) approving the application based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions: Find-ings• 1. That the night lighting of tennis courts in an R-1-A Zone is properly one for which a Conditional Use Permit is authorized by the Zoning Ordinance. 2.. That the recreation type use is acceptable for the development of the community, is in harmony with the various elements of the General Plan, but would extend a noise factor into the evening hours. 3. That the site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the tennis court. 4. That the proposed use should not generate any traffic in addition to that expected for the main house and should not affect the local street system. 5. That the lights may be visible from adjoining properties. June 28, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 11 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) CASE--5-:05-14-CUP. (Continued) 6. That the applicant is proposing landscaping along the north and west sides of the tennis court to decrease the effect of the proposed lighting. Cond-i t-ion s: 1. That all the Development Committee conditions dated June 28, 1989, shall be met. I CASE- --5-.0421-PD-185--J�REVI-SED) . Application by DESERT HOSPITAL for a revised planned development district in lieu of a change of zone for a hospital master plan and expansion including high rise structures, parking, and a helicopter pad (on Tachevah Drive) for property on North Indian Avenue between Tachevah Drive/Paseo El Mirador, R-4 Zone, Section 11. (Commission response to written comments on draft Negative Declaration; no comments received; action. ) Planner (Patenaude) stated that the original master plan was approved by the Council in 1987 and included nursing towers, a parking structure, a hospice, ancillary services, and a remodel of present hospital facilities; that the helipad in the first phase was located on the vacated portion of Paseo El Mirador, and at a future date was to be relocated to a nursing .. tower roof; that because of changes in the focus of the hospital the revised plan has been submitted which is three-phased instead of four; that the plan now proposes two new buildings between the E1 Mirador building and the existing facility; and that the helipad and emergency services will be located on Tachevah Drive. He stated that the main entrance to the hospital would be off Indian Avenue; that the first phase will be completed in 3 to 5 years; that the second phase includes two 5-story nursing towers , one parking structure of 3 levels at 24 ft. in height, and that the height is allowed in the adjacent R-2 Zone. He stated that the structures have a 25 ft. setback; that the third phase will include a 5-story nursing tower (2 locations are being discussed) and a second parking structure; and that the applicants are requesting a variance for reducing setbacks for the nursing towers unless the more interior alternative location is chosen; and that the towers are no higher than the existing tower. He stated that the primary issues of the first master plan remain, i .e. the helipad and the high-rise buildings; that three letters and two phone calls have been received on the helipad location including a letter from the Palm Springs Townhomes Board of Directors requesting that the helipad be denied because of noise, danger, and intrusion of the use and asking for review of the setbacks and location of the parking structures and that the parking meet requirements of the highrise ordinance of 50% underground parking and also asking the Commission to review the tunnel effect of the massive medical building on the west side of the Tachevah and Indian combined with the large parking structure proposed on the east side of Indian and Paseo E1 Mirador. He stated also that the homeowners to the south of Tachevah heli- pad location are opposing the noise, intrusion, and danger of the helipad; June 28, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 12 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) GAS-E-­5:04-21--PD--185--(RE-V-ISED-) . (Continued) t and that the AAC reviewed revised plans and found them acceptable subject to conditions. Chairman asked if the parking garage conformed to R-2 setback requirements. Planner replied that the setback is 25 ft. which is allowed by Ordinance as is the 24 ft. height. Chairman declared the hearing open. Mike Fontana, Desert Hospital Planner, stated that the focus of the hospital has changed because of management and operation changes; and that Phase I is the "GROWTH" Phase, i .e. G: Gereatric Services R: Rehabilitation 0: Oncology . W: Women & Infant Services T: Trauma and Emergency Services H: Heart Care He stated that the money available presently is 28 million dollars rather than the 12 million available in the first master plan; that emergency services will be located on Tachevah with a loop out to Indian Avenue for better access and visibility; that Phases II and III are in generalities ; that Phase I will be completed in three years; that Phase II will reserve a pad for a 5-story nursing tower and that additional parking will be pro- vided by a parking structure; that employee parking will be moved to the perimeter of the grounds to allow for patient and visitor parking in the parking structure; and that some land will be left for expansion of radio- logy and emergency services. He stated that Phase III will include a second nursing tower, either over the lobby area or in the center of the campus; and a second parking structure; that he would like to see the AAC Minutes of June 26 to review the conditions; that variances are needed from open space and setback requirements; and requested that the application be continued to July 26 for a refinement of numbers in the traffic study. Commissioner Whitney stated that the Phase III location for the parking structure would be preferable to the Phase II location. Mr. Fontana explained that the employee parking will have to be moved out of the interior to the perimeter in Phase II to provide adequate parking for visitors at ground level . I June 28, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 13 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) CASE- 5-;0421-PD-185 --(REVISED-) (Continued) Commissioner Olsen stated that he was baffled as to reasons for the loca- tion of the helipad which is situated between an existing building and existing large trees. Mr. Fontana stated that the trees will be removed because the street will be widened; that they are in the right-of-way because of a jog in the hospital property; and that the power lines are underground. Commissioner Olsen commented that he liked the one parking structure con- nected to the main hospital building. Mr. Fontana stated that cars would drive under the second level for patient drop off and then circle up to ground level parking. Commissioner Olsen stated that the parking structures have to be sensitive to the neighborhood and well-designed and Mr. Fontana agreed. Planner stated that the helipad and all new buildings will be reviewed by the Commission. Mr. Fontana explained the Health Key Plus Program for seniors - Which would be housed in the E1 Mirador building. He stated that offices will be on the second floor of the building. Commissioner Dotson asked the number of helicopter flights proposed now and �..� in the future. Mr. Fontana stated that there will not be a helicopter housed at the hospital ; that for the past year the helicopters have landed at the airport and patients transported to the hospital by ambulance; that six landings a month for the next five years is probable with an average of 3 per month because sometimes there are no landings during a month; that situations occur where a helicopter has to bring patients directly to the hospital and there must be a facility for a landing; that the site was chosen to have proximity to the emergency departments of the hospital such as radiology, the laboratory and surgeries; that the site is workable on Tachevah which is a secondary thoroughfare; that the heliport is surrounded by medical and commercial buildings; and that the location fulfills Division of Aeronatics requirements. Commissioner Dotson asked the number of parking spaces used daily by staff and personnel . Mr. Fontana replied that three-fourths of the 730 parking stalls are used by employees and that the application has 1200 parking places which will allow employee parking to be moved to the exterior of the property. Commissioner Dotson requested a graphic outline of the tower and its rela- tionship with other buildings and their relationships to each other and the rest of the campus. June 28, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 14 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) CAS-E--5-i0421---PD--185 -(REV-IS-ED-) . (Continued) Mr. Fontana stated that the relationships are being worked on presently but he did not know if they would be completed within 30 days. Commissioner Whitney asked if most trauma centers have helipads; if there would be maximum of 72 flights per year; and also if a study had been made of the safety of patients if they are landed at the airport. Mr. Fontana stated that most centers have a helipad, and that no one has died being transported from a landing at the airport, but that there is a 15 minute delay which causes problems in continuity of personnel ; and that the airport landing is not a preferable way and is risky for trauma patients. Vince Dundee, 455 The Palms, stated that since his residence backs to the hospital development he has appeared before the Commission several times; that he would like to compliment the hospital for improving its master plan but two issues remain; that since the last meeting he has researched medical helicopters to see if the use is worth the risk; that crashes often kill doctors, nurses and the patients they are transporting; that other Commissions in other cities are denying heliports; that one of the reasons for crashes are power lines; that there are power lines throughout the hospital area; that inexperienced helicopter pilots crash and the heli- copters cut wide swaths- through the land before they crash. He stated that he had saved several clippings regarding fatal helicopter crashes (and showed them to the Commission)�;and stated that he hoped that the hospital would reconsider upon the Commission's recommendation the stipulation of building the helipad; that many people could be killed by the helicopters if they crashed; that many of the homeowners in the area have secured the services of a legal authority on heliports and helicopter damage; that if a helipad is approved, the homeowners will have no alternative but to file action seeking damages against the hospital and the city; that the second issue is of the height and design of the parking structures which will overshadow the neighboring homes. He stated that he hoped the Commission would also consider this issue. Debbie Foster, resident of Avenida Olivos stated that she had concerns about the helipad location and the location of the emergency entrances on Tachevah and requested a 30-day continuance for notification of the neigh- boring residents. She presented a letter from Dr. Picchione opposing the project and stated that the hospital planner informed them that he would work with the neighbors; that the neighbors object to entrances and exits on Tachevah because of the location of Katherine Finchey School ; that the exit aligns with Avenida Olivos; that the public hearing notice did not show the entrances and exits; that every parent of every child attending Katherine Fincheyshould know about the proposal ; that the City has stated that there would be no parking on Tachevah when a medical building was built and at first there was not, but the red paint has been removed and cars park on Tachevah. June 28, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 15 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) CASE-•5,.:0421-PD--185 . (REV-ISED) . (Continued) Chris Foster, Avenida Olivos, member of the N. Palm Canyon Advisory Com- mittee, asked for a 30-day continuance to discuss the proposal at the regular meeting of the committee. Kip Lyons, 400 S. Farrell , representing Mr. Sayles, 1001 Palos Verdes, behind the medical building on Tachevah and Indian stated that his client would be directly impacted and is opposed to the relocation of the emer- gency room and helipad to Tachevah and feels that the close proximity of the emergency room to the neighborhood is not appropriate; and that there will be a traffic impact on the small street. He stated that the neighbor- hood is changing and there is commercial use on Tachevah, but the neigh- boring residents have estate homes; and that the busiest and noisiest uses of the hospital will be on Tachevah. He stated that the helicopter pad has negative impacts and is in one of the busiest parts of the City rather than in an outlying area; that the heliport is near residences, other buildings, and hospital buildings and is also elevated which will made the sound ricochet over to the homes on the south; that further investigation on helicopters and safety concerns is important; that either a Negative Declaration or a mitigative negative declaration is not appropriate where there are substantial impacts; and that the helipad use should have an EIR and that there is case law supporting an EIR; and that "taking" of the property will be reviewed later if the helipad is built. He stated that the hospital expansion should be done delicately because of the impacts; that Mr. Sayles has an estate type of home which he bought for peace and quiet; and that to have a heliport or emergency services use impacts use of his property; that emergency rooms are not quiet places because of noisy loud speakers and squad cars; that the small office building between the uses and the Sayles residence will not be effective as a noise buffer; and that sensitivity should be reviewed by the hospital because the helipad is a substantial change in use for the hospital . He stated that the area is not large; that the entrance to the emergency room is not appropriate off Tachevah; that the north and west sides of the hospital have been tried as locations for the helipad and now the south side is being tried; and that the emergency entrance should be on Indian Avenue. There being no further appearances, the hearing was closed. Chairman asked for the staff recommendation. Planner stated that staff recommended continuance to resolve traffic impacts. Commissioner Whitney stated that she had concerns about the helipad and questioned the value of it for the few trauma cases and the fact that no lives have been lost because of transportation by ambulance from the air- port. She stated that sometimes people get carried away by technology; that she objected to the increased traffic on Tachevah because of the school and the existing heavy traffic; and that the south side may not be June 28, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 16 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) CASE--5-i0421--P-D-1-8-5---(REV-IS-ED-) . (Continued) the place for the emergency room since it would be a poor situation if ambulances were trying to reach the emergency room at the same time that school was being let out. M/S/C (Dotson/Whitney; Edgmon/Mills absent) continuing the application to July 26 for revisions to the traffic study. PUBLIC COMMENTS - None. ITEMS REMOVED FROM CONSENT ACTION AGENDA Approval of architectural cases is valid for two years. The approval granted must be exercised within that time period unless extended. I CASE -5:0-065-PD-86. Application by CATHEDRAL CANYON COUNTRY CLUB for architec- tural approval of landscape plans adjacent to a bikeway and an equestrian trail on a condominium golf course complex on Cathedral Canyon Drive, R-1- i C/RTP Zones (I .L.) , Section 28. Planner (Evans) stated that the bikeway relocation started in 1986 and cul- minated in September 1988 with an agreement between the Council , the developer and the title company outlining the terms of an exchange of loca- tion of the bikepath from its alignment course on a private street to the existing equestrian trail but on a different alignment. He stated that the agreement included non-planning issues such as finance; that the Council and the Recreation and Parks Commission approved the concept plan; and that substantial improvements were made which were not approved by the Planning staff nor the Planning Commission; that the agreement had a provision that the Commission approve the final plans before installation began, but that the bikeway was built without Commission review; and that the developer was told to bring in the "as built" plan to be approved by the City; that the developer was given the opportunity to prepare a plan that could be approved by the Commission; that staff approved the landscape plan which was installed, inspected and accepted by staff; that after the installation he was at Cathedral Canyon Country Club on June 2, 1989 and saw planting activity and issued a stop work order which is the reason that the plan is brought before the Commission. He stated that the AAC reviewed the appli- cation on Monday, June 26 and that the area of concern is actually two- thirds of the area of the bikepath. He explained that the intent was to have a 4 to 5 ft. chain link fence on the golf course with landscaping filling up to about 5 ft. so that equestrians and bikers were not walled in by a hedge, but that Falcon Lakes had added additional landscaping material ; that he had met with Mr. Bushman, the president of Falcon Lakes, to discuss problems; and that some additional materials were approved to solve problems of adjoining land uses and because the homeowners overlook an industrial area of Cathedral City, a plant nursery and a mobile home • June 28, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 17 ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA (Continued) GAS-E--5-:0065--PD-86. (Continued) park. He stated that if the approved landscaping were allowed to grow and the trees not trimmed, in one or two years the landscaping would form a fairly solid landscaping barrier around the perimeter but that the appli- cant after pressure from the homeowners planted additional plantings such as Sumac and Ficus on the golf course side and that the AAC felt that the plantings were inappropriate because they are too large; that the other materials will cause maintenance problems for the City; and that the AAC recommended a restudy and that a concept be developed after a review of property lines for dwellings so that windows are formed onto the golf course by scattered hedgerows. He stated that in the future phases of the auto park there may be walls and buffers, and that the staff recommendation is for restudy to work out a solution that will be beneficial to the City and the homeowners. Commissioner Hough asked about diagonal hedgerows. Planner explained that there is not enough room for a diagonal arrangement of plantings and that the intent is to keep the trail open to the golf course for bikers and equestrians. i Chairman stated that the item is not a public hearing; that the Commis- sioners have received many letters; and that he would like comments from the developer, a representative of the homeowners' association, and a representative from Parks & Recreation. Al Bushman, /President of Falcon Lake Properties stated that he was frustrated; that the �> problems began in 1986 and have continued to June 2, 1989 when he received a notice of code violation; that he had a letter from the former Director of Community Services approving the plantings; that the original plan was submitted under the Parks and Recreation Department; that there was no intent not to make a quality landscaping plan'.,; that he has spent $100 a square foot for the plantings to date ($333,000) ; that the former Parks & Recreation Director was terminated and review taken over by the Planning Division; that there has been friction between the Parks Department and the Planning Division on who has authority over the project; that when the planner (Evans) became involved the plantings were removed; that landscape architect. Ron Gregory had been hired and additional plantings were added; that oleanders along the trail were removed; that he thought he had a ver- bal agreement for additional plantings as long as they were limited to Oleaders (24 Oleanders along a 5,000 ft. trail ) ; that Oleanders were planted on the golf course site to satisfy the homeowners and that he was then told that oleanders are poison for horses (although there are oleanders in playgrounds for children) ; and that he would have to take out the 24 oleanders; that he wrote a letter on August 19, 1988 stating that he was planting the oleanders and was never told not to; that taking out the Sumac and Ficus is unreasonable; that he has been trying to please every- body; and that a maintenance fund has been established for whatever is approved regarding planting material ; that a check from Stewart Title Company to the City for $35,000 was lost; that he sent a $20,000 check to his attorney as a bond; that he is speaking for the homeowners who want the plantings; that the trail can be walked in 12 minutes and the view is not June 28, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 18 ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA (Continued) CASE- 5-:OO65--RD-86. (Continued) obscured from the trail ; that he is becoming very stressed over the situa- tion; that he cannot satisfy the neighbors, the bikers, the equestrians, the homeowners, and the City; that he has not been given good advice or instructions; that the homeowners pay taxes and should be satisfied before the bikers and equestrians (who also do not participate in maintenance) ; that everyone thinks the trail is pretty except for some Planning and Parks y people; and that he was told to build a rail fence and purchased $20,000 worth of wood and then was told he would not have to have a fence; and requested that the planting plan be approved. Joel Simon, 3081 Regency, asked that the plantings be kept to reduce the amount of light from the auto park; to achieve a green belt; and to avoid monetary devaluation of their homes and mental anguish to the homeowners. Bill Morton, President of Homeowners Association No. 15, Cathedral Canyon Country Club, stated that he lived close to the fence; that he took a ride around the circumference; that Falcon Lakes has improved the original planting concept; that there is a green belt that is maintained; that the auto park is overlighted; and that staff has shown more concern for the bikers and equestrians than the homeowners who are taxpayers ; that Falcon Lakes has done everything to comply with City requirements; and that is acceptable for the bikers to use the bikepath. Jack Isley, President Cathedral Canyon Homeowners Association No. 1, stated `.� that it is necessary to have a buffer around holes Nos. 15 and 16 for safety and that he has seen only 3 horses in 12 years along the trail . Sandara Levin, Cathedral Canyon Country Club, across the lake from the 15th green, stated that removing the shrubs would make the area ugly; that plantings on the Cathedral Country Club site are beautiful , but not on the other side; and that trees are needed. She asked that the plantings be kept for enjoyment of homes and views. Herbert Montgomery, 119 Calle Morelos, stated that he overlooked the bike trail ; that the oleanders were 10 to 12 ft. high when he bought his home so no noise could be heard from the road because they buffer the noise but when they were cut down the area became very noisy and s" nce they have been replanted , it is not noisy. He stated that soil from the nursery blows into his yard when- there are no Oleanders; and that the shrubbery is beautiful and no one has complained. He. stated that Mr. Bushman has spent a fortune on planting and replanting the landscaping; and that if the shrubbery is not allowed he will go to the taxing board to have his property devalued. Grover Wade, 291 Calle Landers, stated that a pedestrian can get hit by golf balls on the dangerous bike path which is Ievidenced by the sign at the entry as follows: "You are entering a dangerous area. Duck those flying golf balls. Diane Marantz, #6 Palomino, 2 year member of the Parks and Recreation Com- mission, stated that the bike trail was relocated at the request of the 06/28/89 PC MINUTES Page 19 ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA (Continued) CA-SE-5 (Continued) Cathedral Canyon Country Club because homeowners thought they lived in a gated community and did not want bikers riding though their complex; that there was nothing wrong with the existing bike trail as it was two years ago; that she did not know details of the circumstances before she was appointed to the Commission; that the developer knows the process; that when the new bike trail was opened it was dangerous, but is a tunnel now and in 6 months no one will be able to get through; that if the new home- owners do not want to look at the auto park it is not the City's problem and has nothing to do with the bike trail ; that the bike trail was filthy until the Planning Commission field trip at which time the developer cleaned the trail ; that the developers want the bikers removed; that the item has been on the Parks and Recreation Commission agenda many times; that if the developers do not want to work with the City, they can give the City back its bike trail . Planning Director stated that the Director of Operations and the Parks Supervisor were present to answer questions. i Chairman asked about accepting the trail the way it is. Planner stated that there are design problems; that the City does not want a hedge condition that obscures the bikeway from the golf course; that some of the plants will grow fast and large and will grow through the fence and encroach upon the equestrian trail ; that some shrub species have been planted too close to the fence and will eventually lift the fence; that if .. the Commission wants to approve an "as built" design, a written agreement should be provided by Cathedral Canyon Country Club that the hedge be main- tained and all the materials kept off the equestrian trail ; and that the plantings were neglected originally. Commissioner Hough stated that he went on the field trip and the original plan would have resulted in a screen as the plants grew; that the existing materials look good but will create a tunnel on the trail which is not the intent of the City. He stated that the problem could be solved by a restudy of the plan to make view corridors into the golf course for the users of the trail and by blocking the view on the condominium portion of the plan; and that the current plantings may form an area where a unsavory element could gather and harm people using the trail . Commissioner Olsen stated that the bike trail was moved at the request of the developer and with that comes the obligation for the developer to make things nicer for the homeowners and trail users; that the trail resembles a vegetative tunnel ; and that the developers concern is to make the area green to sell houses and then leave; that the application is patchwork and that the developer and the planners should meet to resolve the problem of plantings that are not part of the original plans. June 28, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 20 ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA (Continued) CASE--5-;O065-PD-8f. (Continued) Commissioner Dotson stated that he agreed with Commissioners Olsen and Hough and a creative solution should be devised; that he was concerned about the tunnel effect; and also the intensification. He stated that the lack of view on either side is a problem and that a creative approach should be used to solve it. Mr. Bushman stated that he was not looking at the problem as a developer but as a citizen of Palm Springs; and whether or not it was worth it and that he did not think safety was a factor. He stated that there is a maintenance fund for whatever is planted and gardeners clean the trail at least weekly. M/S/C (Hough/Olsen; Edgmon absent) for a restudy with direction that staff and the developer meet and design a landscape plan per AAC direction with a maintenance agreement established so the growth does not encroach into the trail . NB: The AAC recommended a restudy noting the following: That the developer work toward creating a staggered landscape to allow "windows" onto the golf course. ARCHITECTURAL APPROVAL ITEMS Approval of architectural cases is valid for two years. The approval granted must be exercised within that time period unless extended. TTM 23557. Application by JOHN HACKER for Kenneth Hinsvark for architectural approval of a grading plan for a tentative tract map to allow seven home sites on the south end of Camino Parocela between Fern Canyon Drive/Belardo Road, W-R-1-A Zone, Section 22. Planner (Evans) stated that the application was reviewed by the AAC on May 22 and the applicant requested a continuance to prepare additional exhi- bits; that the concept is to create lots, put in tennis courts, and prepare a grading plan for individual lots; that there is a misunderstanding and the developer does not want natural pads but graded pads and that the grading plan was reviewed on May 22 by the AAC who recommended restudy. He stated that there is a 15 ft. fill on the worst condition and the whole area may be disturbed in the grading process. He stated that the AAC felt that the grading cut did not comply with City standards and the AAC did not want large bench pads created; and that he had met with the applicant and recom- mended that an acceptable grading plan be developed but that the applicant wants a large one-level pad for himself which can be done (but not as was originally proposed) ; that the applicant has prepared a scale model ; that no restoration plans have been indicated; that there will be much grading for roads and the pads; that soil in the area takes a long time to restore because water brings weeds which also scar and that the model shows a driveway change. June 28, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 21 ARCHITECTURAL APPROVAL ITEMS (Continued) TTM- 23557. (Continued) Commissioner Dotson asked if one house was eliminated from the plan and Planner replied no; that there are seven buildable sites. Ken Hinsvark, 770 West Sunny Dunes, the applicant stated, that he lives to the east of the property and that he blended a pad into the desert and there was no problem with restoration of the natural desert. He stated that a 29 lot subdivision was proposed before he bought the land for a prestige development and to preserve the desert landscaping; that staff advises him to wait until the houses are designed before grading plans are approved; that the AAC might force him to move the houses downhill where there are no views; that no direction has been given to him by the AAC; that he wants a concept established for seven level building sites; and that if that is not possible he will go back to a normal subdivision. Commissioner Hough stated that a; grading plan for the road can be approved to allow the applicant to continue the process and he asked if the lots will be sold individually. Mr. Hinsvark stated that there was no mention in the conditions of approval of the map that a grading plan would not be developed until house plans were submitted. Planning Director stated that the roadway grading could be approved and that the applicant is trying to pre-approve a concept that someone will not have to submit a house without a preapproved grading plan on the lot. Commissioner Dotson asked if a developable area foot print could be desig- nated on individual pieces to allow flexibility and Planning Director stated that it would be possible to do this. Commissioner Dotson asked if the applicant wanted a flat pad or wanted to know where he could build. Mr. Hinsvark stated that he has to have a flat pad on the upper level because he wants a one-level house for his family and that his partner wants a two-level.,. He stated that he did not want the AAC to give him trouble when he sells the land because the committee wants him to grade to the contours of the land. Chairman stated that he was in favor of approving the grading plans for the roadway system and the subdivision of seven lots; the applicant has con- cerns about flat houses on one level but that the only ones who can afford the houses would be older and would want a house on only one level ; that the grading can be stairstepped with retaining walls so that scarring is not evident; and that native material can be used to build flat pads and individual cases reviewed. He stated that the AAC is advisory only; that the Commission makes the decision; that an architect can design the grading to fit the house and that the land does not have to be scarred to make flat pads. June 28, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 22 ARCHITECTURAL APPROVAL ITEMS (Continued) TTM- 23557. (Continued) Mr. Hinsvark replied that he wanted approval of flat pads; that terraces and retaining walls are acceptable; that he wants seven level pads and that otherwise he will build a subdivision; and that he did not trust the AAC because he had a difficult time with the Committee on a previous application. Chairman stated that the grading plan cannot be approved and that no one will approve scarring the hillsides. Commissioner Dotson stated that the applicant's grading plan cannot be approved because the circulation system has changed and suggested that he prepare a plan for the present circulation pattern and the two pads and that the buildable area be established by the Commission on the other sites, which is the normal procedure. Planning Director stated that the applicant is not worried about every house being stairstepped down but wants every house at a single level to sell the lots which would solve both issues. Mr. Hinsvark stated that he had prepared a motion for action by the Commis- sion that he would accept. Chairman stated that he had concerns about taking action on the specific plan of the applicant although he had no problem with stating that the lots could be 25,000 feet of flat pad (if done properly) . He stated that taking `�-- action on the specific plan submitted by Mr. Hinsvark removes flexibility for an outstanding submittal . Mr. Hinsvark reiterated that he wanted the action per the grading plan that he submitted; and that an architect could change the plan when a house is designed. Chairman explained that under R-1-A Zone provisions the setback is 25 ft. and people can build at 25 ft. from the front of the property, which is the applicant's option and that a level pad could be allowed at each site but not as depicted on the applicant's grading plan. M/S/C (Olsen/Whitney; Edgmon absent; Dotson dissented) approving the con- cept of houses on a single level ; approving street grading; and requiring that lots be reviewed by the Commission when house plans are submitted. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS CITY-COUNCIL -ACTIONS. Update of City Council actions. No report given. June 28, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 23 MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS (Continued) COMM-ISSIONf STAFF -RE-PORTS -OR-R-EQUESTS. No action taken. ADDED- STARTERS. (Determination of eligibility for consideration.) None. CASE--5.0457-MISC. Request by the STATE MINING & GEOLOGY BOARD for Commission review and comment on the proposed Designation of Regionally Significant Construction Aggregate in the Palm Springs Production-Consumption Region within the city limits and Sphere of Influence. i No action taken due to lack of quorum. CommissionerOlsen and Chairman left. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Chairman adjourned the meeting at 4:45 p.m. due to a lack of a quorum. LNIIING T MDR/ml ice, PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES Council Chamber, City Hall July 12, 1989 1:30 p.m. • ROLL CALL F-Y 1988 - 1989 Present Present Excused Absences Planning Commission This Meeting to Date to Date Larry Lapham, Chairman X 1 0 Gary Olsen X 1 0 Barbara Whitney X 1 0 Brent Hough X 1 0 Martha Edgmon X 1 0 Chris Mills X 1 0 Michael Dotson X 1 0 Staff Present Frank Balistrieri , Deputy City Attorney Douglas Evans, Planner Debra Goodwin, Planner Richard Patenaude, Planner Sherri Abbas, Planner Dave Forcucci , Planner John Terell , Redevelopment Coordinator Dean Lewis, Traffic Engineer Mary E. Lawler, Recording Secretary Architectural Advisory Committee - July 10, 1989 • Brent Hough, Chairman Will Kleindienst William Johnson Mike Buccino Tom Doczi Reuel Young Chairman called the meeting to order at 1:30 p.m. M/S/C (Dotson/Hough) approving minutes of June 28, 1989 with the following correction: Commissioner Mills was absent (not present) at the meeting. ADMINISTRATIVE NOTE: There were no Tribal Council comments . REPORT OF POSTING AGENDA: The July 12, 1989 agenda was available for public access at the City Hall exterior bulletin board and the Planning Division Counter by 5:00 p.m., Friday, Is July 7, 1989.