Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1989/06/14 - MINUTES j PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES Council Chamber, City Hall June 14, 1989 ti 1:30 p.m. ROLL CALL F-Y 1988 - 1989 Present Present Excused Absences Planning Commission This Meeting to Date to Date Larry Lapham, Chairman X 21 2 Gary Olsen X 19 4 Barbara Whitney X 18 5 Brent Hough X 21 2 Martha Edgmon a`« 20 3 Chris Mills X 19 2 Michael Dotson X 20 0 Staff Present Marvin D. Roos, Planning Director Siegfried Siefkes, Assistant City Attorney Douglas Evans , Planner Debra Goodwin, Planner Dave Forcucci , Planner Sherri Abbas, Planner Mary E. Lawler, Recording Secretary i i Architectural Advisory Committee - June 12, 1989 Brent Hough, Chairman Will Kleindienst `�.. William Johnson Mike Buccino Tom Doczi Reuel Young Chairman called the meeting to order at 1:30 p.m. M/S/C (Olsen/Hough) approving minutes of May 24, 1989 with the following corrections: Page 4, TTM 23928. Add: Mills abstained. Page- 12, Case 5.0438-MISC. Delete Paragraph 5. Add "Commissioner Dotson asked the reasons for initiation of an environmental assessment at this point since it should have been done when the Master Plan and Noise Study were done." REPORT OF POSTING AGENDA: The June 14, 1989 agenda was available for public access at the City Hall exterior bulletin board and the Planning Division Counter by 5:00 p.m. , Friday, June 9, 1989. June 14, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 2 CONSENT ACTION AGENDA Approval of architectural cases is valid for two years. The approval granted must be exercised within that time period unless extended. M/S/C (Edgmon/Dotson) taking the following actions: CASE -3.0477. Application by DAVID CHRISTIAN for architectural approval of working drawings for Tony Roma's Restaurant, S. Palm Canyon Drive between Ramon Road/Baristo Road, CBD Zone, Section 15. Restudy noting the following: 1. That the parking layout is unacceptable. 2. That metal coping is unacceptable. 3. That framework on doors should be increased. 4. That cap detail on walls is inconsistent with approved plan. 5. That approved plan has 3 windows on the west elevation, on the northern end of building. Construction set shows only 2. CASE 3.0565 (MINOR) . Application by ST. TROPEZ VILLAS HOA for architectural approval of revised landscape plans for condominium complex on Alejo Road between Alvarado/El Segundo Roads, R-G-A(8) Zone (I .L.) , Section 14. Continued to June 28 at the applicants' request. Olsen abstained. CASE 3.0573 (MINOR) . Application by MESQUITE COUNTY CLUB for architectural approval of a storage shed at 1801 Sunny Dunes Road, W-R-1-C Zone, Section 24. Approved as submitted. Mills abstained. CASE -3.0600. Application by DETE JACKSON for architectural approval of single- family residence on Andreas Palms Drive between Bogert Trail/Andreas Palms Drive, W-R-1-B Zone, Section 35. Approved subject to the following conditions: 1. That the vertical landscaping be placed on the north side of the residence. �`' 2. That the final landscaping plans be approved at staff level . June 14, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 3 CONSENT AGENDA (Continued) CASE 3.0600. (Continued) 3. That all recommendations of the Development Committee be implemented. CASE- 3.0608 (MINOR) . Application by SUNRISE VILLAGE for architectural approval of entry walls, landscaping, and carports, for mobilehome complex at 1500 E. San Rafael , PD-116, Section 35. Approved carports; continued walls and landscaping to June 28 at the applicants' request. CASE 3.0613 (MINOR) . Application by FRANK BROTHERS for architectural approval of a partial change of color on front overhang, 246-256 S. Palm Canyon Drive, CBD Zone, Section 15. Approved as submitted . CASE 5.0501-CUP. Application by CHRISTOPHER MILLS for Ben Perry for architec- tural approval of final detailed landscape, irrigation and exterior lighting plans for a tennis court at 2441 Southridge Circle, R-1-B Zone, Section 25. Planner (Evans) stated that the Council denied the lighting; that desert landscaping is being used to soften the hillside conditions; and that entry gates will be installed at the end of the private street. Approved as submitted. SIGN APPLICATION. Application by QUIEL BROTHERS SIGN COMPANY for Palm Springs Public Storage Company for architectural approval of a revised main identification sign at 1400 S. Gene Autry Trail , M-1 Zone, Section 20. Continued to June 28 at the applicants' request. SIGN APPLICATION. Application by IMPERIAL SIGN COMPANY for change of face of main identification sign for Texaco Service Station at Tram Way/N. Palm Canyon Drive, UR Zone, Section 3. Approved subject to the following conditions: 1. That the white background be changed to gray. 2. That the copy be either red, white or black. i June 14, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 4 CONSENT AGENDA (Continued) TTM -21885. Application by SANBORN/WEBB ENGINEERING for Cathedral Canyon Country Club for architectural approval of final grading plans for Phase 11-4 of Cathedral Canyon Country Club located west of Cathedral Canyon Drive, south of the Whitewater River Channel , PD-86, Section 28. Approved subject to the following condition: That the retaining wall in "detail AA" be redesigned. CASE 3.0272. Application by VOSS INVESTMENTS for architectural approval of a sign program for a retail/restaurant complex on the northeast corner of Avenida Caballeros/Tahquitz Way, C-1-AA (IL) , Section 14. Restudy noting the following: 1. That sign program with canopy details be resubmitted. 2. That details of sign attachment to building be provided. 3. That the monument sign face and material are acceptable but the size and location need restudy. /(MINOR) . CASE 3.0618, Application by SILK ROAD RESTAURANT (formerly Sensu) for architectural approval of an awning over an existing patio, CBD Zone, �.- Section 15. Restudy noting the following: 1. That established color of awning program be used. 2. That vertical supports have a design that ties into building design . 3. That attachment details be restudied. /(MINOR). CASE- 3.0619, Application by PALM SPRINGS SHADE CO. for architectural approval of an entrance awning at The Palms, 572 N. Indian Avenue, R-3 Zone, Section 11. Restudy noting the following: That use of materials other than canvas be considered. June 14, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 5 CONSENT AGENDA (Continued) CASE 3.8-30 - -TIME -EXTENSION. Application by LAUREL PALMS, INC. for a twelve- month time extension for a 61-unit apartment complex on San Rafael Drive, �..! between N. Indian Avenue/Virginia, R-2 Zone, Section 3. subject Approved/to all original conditions of approval . The new expiration date will be June 24, 1990. I j Abstention: Whitney/Lapham I ITEMS REMOVED FROM CONSENT ACTION AGENDA Approval of architectural cases is valid for two years. The approval granted must be exercised within that time period unless extended. CASE - 3.0053. Application by ED KANAN for architectural approval of revised parking lot lighting for an apartment complex on Ramon Road/Grenfall , R-2 Zone, Section 23. Planner (Evans) stated that the Commission deleted the original full bus turnout, which had been recommended by the Traffic Engineer, because of limited site area; that staff requested a scaled down version, i .e. a bus bench, shade and a pad; that the applicant has provided a large olive tree but does not want to provide the bench; that the applicant does not want to provide the extra lighting (required in the ordinance) in the parking lot since he feels that the light from the decorative light fixtures and soffit lighting on the carports are adequate. Ed Kanan, project developer, explained that he had started the project three years ago; that he had opposed the condition for a turnout and a shelter and thought that the requirement had been deleted until he found that he is required to install a bus bench; that he had no problem with the slab and the shade tree but that the project had become expensive and the fees enormous (over 10% of the cost of the project) ; that he did not feel it was fair to have to provide a bus bench; that the bus company should pay for it since it may move the bench in the future; and that he feels that the lighting is adequate and additional lighting would be too commercial for a residential parking lot. He stated that it would detract from the project, and that the AAC approved the light fixture he is proposing. Chairman asked if the one foot candle power requirement would be met if the fixtures held 75 watt bulbs . Planner replied that it would not, and that one foot candle power is required in the ordinance. Commissioner Hough stated that to bring the lighting up using the fixture proposed would create hot spots and hot spots were discouraged by the AAC. Mr. Kanan replied that the combination of fixtures and carport lighting, which would be added later, will bring the lighting up to code, and that the project is residential and low lighting should be used. Chairman explained that the light level of one foot candle is in the ordinance; that a variance would have to be granted to allow the lower level of lighting; and that there are no grounds for a variance. June 14, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 6 ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA (Continued) CASE 3.0053. (Continued) Commissioner Mills stated that the fixture proposed is more attractive than the other fixture; that with carport lighting there might to a spread of light to reach the required lighting level ; and that supplementary lighting could be added later (if needed) under the carports. Planner stated that staff has requested lighting certification information from the applicant which has not been provided; and that light levels could be taken after the project is started but that a commitment has to be made by the applicant to meet lighting level requirements. Chairman asked about providing bus benches . Planner stated that on new projects the developer is required to provide a bus stop facility consistent with the design of the project. Commissioner Olsen asked if the size of the project were a factor in requiring a bus bench. Planner answered that the provision is based on review of the location, and that the project is on a major thoroughfare. Commissioner Edgmon commented that it would be better from the developers viewpoint to have a bench rather than a structure and that a bench is appropriate in this instance. Commissioner Dotson asked if the discussion were about a bus bench or a bus shelter. Planner stated that it would be a bus bench submitted to the City for approval . Planner suggested a bench similar to the downtown bench. , which is a sturdy bench consistent with the design of the project. Mr. Kanan asked if the Certificate of Occupancy (CO) would be delayed until the lighting is approved since he needs a CO for loan disbursement. Chairman replied that once the power is turned on, a light level reading can be taken and a CO obtained. Planner stated that the carports are on a different schedule from the rest of the project, and that temporary lighting should be provided until the carports are built. M/S/C (Mills/Whitney) approving the application subject to the following conditions: 1. That the light bulbs be frosted and limited to 60 watts maximum. Lights to be reviewed by staff for intensity and light wattage may be reduced. 2. That the revised palm tree planting plan and flue cap detail are approved. June 14, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 7 ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA (Continued) CASE 3.0053. (Continued) 3. That the light fixtures approved by the AAC are to be installed and if the lighting level is under one foot candle, additional, lighting is to be installed under the carport (with an approved fixture) to reach the required lighting level . 4. That the applicants install a bus bench. PUBLIC HEARINGS CASE 5.0438-MISC (CONTINUED) . Initiation of a Notice of Preparation of an EIR and Initial Study/Environmental Assessment by the CITY OF PALM SPRINGS for the Palm Springs Regional Airport Master Plan update of Federal Aviation Regulations, Part 150, Noise Compatibility Study. (The Master Plan update evaluates the current and projected aviation demand over a future 20 year time frame and includes a phased schedule for airport improvements.) Planner (Evans) stated that the meeting is procedural to receive input which will be included in the draft EIR; that some concerns have been noted; that a letter has been received from the Air Resources Board outlining its concerns; that a letter has also been received from a resident of Palm Springs Townhomes requesting review of the following: helicopter route; single event noise levels, increases in commercial traffic if the general aviation ramp is constructed; impacts in the future if the airport is designated as an international airport; angle of arrivals/departures, including elevations/altitudes of the commercial carriers; and review of the Noise Element which mandates a low noise atmosphere for the City. Chairman declared the hearing open; there being no further appearances; Chairman declared the hearing closed. Chairman asked about the two story boarding ramps proposed in the future at the airport. Al Smoot, Director of Aviation and Energy, stated that a subcommittee of the Council and Airport Commission has been formed to review alternatives for future needs; that the committee is reviewing boarding bridges which have to be a second story level or continuation of boarding from the asphalt; and that building boarding bridges will be a cost concern. Planner stated that the Commission should state any additional concerns for the draft EIR on the Master Plan and Noise Study. Commissioner Dotson expressed concerns in the initial study noise compati- bility program and master plan update and made a motion for the consultants to amend the initial study check list regarding the following: Page 13. Paragraph 6. NOISE. June 14, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 8 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) CASE -5i0438-MISC- (CONTINUED) . (Continued) (b) Noise level exposure. Change from "No" to "Maybe". Number of flights and single event noise levels should be considered. Paragraph 10. RISK OF UPSET (a) Risk of exposure and hazardous substances in the event of an accident or upsetting conditions. Change from "No" to "Maybe" . Page 14. Paragraph 13. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems. Change from "No" to "Maybe" . Paragraph 14. PUBLIC SERVICES (a) Fire protection. (e) Effect on maintenance of public facilities including roads. Change from "No" to "Maybe" . Page 16. Paragraph 21. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE (a) Degredation of the quality of the environment, reduction of fish or animal life habitat or population; elimination of a plant or animal community; reduction of the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal , or elimination of any examples of major periods of California history. Change from "No" to "Maybe" . Commissioner Dotson stated that the answers in the report indicate "no" but there are impacts that should be addressed and that all concerns stated in the letter of June 12 from a resident of Palm Springs Townhomes should also be addressed. In reply to Commissioner Mills' question on noise footprint updating, Planner stated that the noise contour line will be updated. Aviation and Energy Director stated that the noise study in the Master Plan has new noise footprints in it, will be part of the process, and will be adopted as a Technical Element of the General Plan and would be a new noise footprint; and that the consultant is taking noise measurements on the parallel runway. Commissioner Edgmon asked about addressing specific issues. Aviation and Energy Director stated that he did not know if the helicopter issues would be addressed and had not received the letter regarding the helicopter routes; that the consultants will try to address issues of the Master Plan and Noise Studies; that the study took over a year and the questions have been addressed and approved by the FFA; that additional issues can be addressed in the environmental process; that Community Noise Event Levels (CNEL) are addressed, not single event noise levels; that flight tracks are not included in the study and are in the FAA purview; that the pattern of flights was established 45 years ago; that the planes take off from either the north or the south except when the wind is blowing. June 14, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 9 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) i I CASE 5.0438-MISC (CONTINUED) . (Continued) Commissioner Edgmon asked if consideration of the pattern of development makes a difference. Aviation and Energy Director stated that the only issue is the safe arrival and departure of the planes; that he did not determine the routes and they that are dealt with through the FAA process. Planner stated that the helicopter routes over the Townhomes will be reviewed and helicopter flights defined as to origin (whether they come from the airport or Desert Hospital ) ; and that helicopter flights for the hospital cannot be addressed at this time unless they are landing at the airport. He stated that many of the concerns are not in the purview of the city, are FAA criteria, and some issues may not be in the scope of the Airport Master Plan or EIR. Chairman stated that the FAA is in charge and will ultimately approve the Environmental Assessment. Planner stated that the NOP (Notice of Preparation) hearing be closed at the meeting and hearings will be renoticed in the future. Commissioner Dotson asked if although the FAA controls standards, can the City exceed the FAA requirements. ,., Aviation and Energy Director stated that the City cannot exceed the requirements and cities that have, have been struck down in the courts . Commissioner Mills seconded Commissioner Dotson's request to review addi- tional issues in the Draft EIR. The vote was as follows : Ayes: Whitney, Hough, Edgmon, Mills, Dotson Noes: Olsen, Lapham Motion was carried that the issues of concern noted by Commissioner Dotson and a resident of the Palm Springs Townhomes be addressed in the draft EIR. TRIBAL COUNCIL COMMENTS This case was initially considered by the Tribal Council at its meeting of May 23, 1989. After consideration of the recommendations of the Tribal Planning Consultant, the Tribal Council reiterated its action of May 23, 1989, to acknowledge receipt of the Notice of Preparation of a Draft EIR, and to express its intent to provide input as to the scope and content of the environmental document within the 45-day response time referenced in the N.O.P. June 14, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 10 PUBLIC COMMENTS - None. i ITEMS REMOVED FROM CONSENT ACTION AGENDA Approval of architectural cases is valid for two years . The approval granted must be exercised within that time period unless extended. I CASE 3.0552. Application by JOSEPH CRNCIC for architectural approval of revised plans for a single-family hillside residence on Ramon Road, Fern Canyon Drive, R-1-A Zone, Section 22. Planner Abbas stated that the application has been restudied with con- cerns pp cerns on the massing of the building, the lack of articulation in the roofs and the wall , and the appearance of the main entrance; that the applicant has changed the elevations and placed arches around the windows; and that the revisions may or may not be in conformance with the AAC's direction. She stated that the applicant wants to address the Commission; that the corner driveway had been deleted; that a new configuration can be accepted in this particular case; that lot coverage is over the 2% requirement; and that the lot size is under minimum requirements. Ralph Miller, 1319 Palisades Drive, Pacific Palisades , architect representing Mr. Crncic (who was not present) , stated that Mr. Crncic needs direction from the Commission and has had little direction from an archi- tect; and that he was present to help interpret the problems which seem to be regarding the roof because the other problems have been addressed; and that the size of the house is a requirement for the applicant. He stated that it is not a tract house and it is well planned inside and the outside is sensitive; and that Mr. Crcnic is a good craftsman and the quality will be high. He stated he was disappointed that the AAC architects reviewing the plans did not like them; that little direction has been given by the AAC; and that the applicant would be appreciative if direction were given by the Commission on the revisions. Chairman read the AAC recommendations and stated that the design should be totally redone. He stated that the site is 5 ft. above the street and that the house resembles a bank (not a house) ; and that the house is too massive for the neighborhood and site. He commented that the applicant is designing "bandaid" changes to the plan and must begin again and not over- load the lot; and that even if the applicant needs the square footage it can be designed better; that presently there are straight faces on both streets without relief except for pop-outs; and that the elevations need to be staggered on both streets and the roof designed better. He stated that the applicant is not listening to the Commission. Mr. Smith noted that the problem could be that the applicant has not under- stood the Commission's directions; that the AAC should be the ones the applicant addresses; and that varying walls and roof heights would be a better solution. Commissioner Mills also stated that variations would help the elevations. �,,., Chairman commented that the applicant needs professional design help. June 14, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 11 ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA (Continued) i CASE- 3.0552. (Continued) Mr. Smith noted that the applicant would do what is needed, that he under- stood the direction; and thanked the Commission for their help. M/S/C (Whitney/Edgmon) for a restudy of the application noting the following concerns: 1. That the building needs more articulation in the walls. 2. That the roof line needs to vary in height. 3. That the building is too massive. 4. That main entrance needs to be restudied. CASE 3.0592 (MINOR) . Application by PAUL A. MITCHELL for architectural approval of auxiliary parking lot at the northeast corner of Golf Club Drive/E. Palm Canyon Drive, W-R-3 Zone, Section 29. Planner (Goodwin) stated that the auxiliary lot has 18 spaces; that the AAC approved it subject to conditions and felt the concept was acceptable; and that the existing trees should be considered in the final landscape plan and retained in their present locations. Planner stated that the site has a special requirement regarding distance because of a flood control easement; and that the applicant wants to extend into the easement. Commissioner Mills stated that he was the original designer of the project and was not told that setbacks were different at Golf Club Drive. Planner stated that the staff had the same concerns but the special setback stops at Golf Club Drive and has not been amended since the design of the original project. M/S/C (Olsen/Whitney; Dotson abstained) approving the application subject to the following conditions: 1. That the parking lot concept is acceptable. 2. That the existing trees be respected in the final landscape plan with those trees remaining in present locations or relocating them in parking lot. 3. That the cars be screened both from the existing units and from the street. 4. That the applicant look at alternative paving materials to allow existing trees to remain in place. June 14, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 12 I ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA (Continued) i CASE -3.0592 (MINOR) . (Continued) 5. That all recommendations of the Development Committee be met. i CASE- 3.0598- (MINOR) . Application by PALM SPRINGS SPA HOTEL for architectural approval of porte cochere remodel at 100 N. Indian Avenue, C-2/C-1-AA Zone (I .L.) , Section 14. Planner (Goodwin) stated that the awnings are canvas pyramid structures. Commissioner Hough stated that the AAC approved the concept but wanted to see scaled drawings. Chairman commented that the pyramids on Tahquitz on the Spa Hotel are pleasing, in scale, and are a pleasing color. Commissioner Olsen commented that the canvas pyramids were not approved when submitted previously. Chairman stated that the previous submittal was a different design. Commissioner Olsen stated that the pyramids on Tahquitz are attractive but not maintained and have been dirty since installation; and that the pro- posed pyramids will also not be maintained. Commissioner Whitney stated that the City has too many pyramids along the Tahquitz corridor and the design was not approvedoriginally. Commissioner Mills commented that the tops of the pyramids on the project at the corner of Avenida Caballeros and Tahquitz were removed by the Council and that the peach colored awning is still in place on the dining patio at the Spa Hotel facing Tahquitz. He stated that the awnings in the City are filthy in general and if awnings continue to be approved it will have to be accepted that maintenance cannot be mandated. In reply to Chairman's question, Planner (Evans) stated that businesses could be cited for lack of maintenance but follow-up enforcement is difficult. Commissioner Olsen stated that large projects schedule awning maintenance; that perhaps awnings should not be approved since there is no way to force maintenance; that the dark colors have a better appearance but get dirty and the light ones are not as pleasant in appearance but do not show dirt which is a "Catch 22" situation. He stated that they have a good appearance when new. Commissioner Mills stated that the proposed awning will probably be main- tained since it is on a major hotel and a front door to the City; and interior lighting would be effective and that awnings on the smaller shops look bad. He stated that the hotels will take care of awnings. June 14, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 13 ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA (Continued) i CASE -3.0598- (MINOR) . (Continued) i Commissioner Olsen commented that the Spa Hotel has not. i Commissioner Whitney remarked that she felt there was a maintenance problem I and that awnings are a poor application for major hotels. M/S/C (Whitney/Olsen) to deny the application. The vote was as follows : Ayes : Whitney, Olsen Noes: Hough, Edgmon, Mills, Dotson, Lapham The motion was defeated. M/S/C (Mills/Hough; Whitney dissented) approving the application subject to the following conditions: 1. That scale drawings be submitted for the awning. 2. That the awnings are required to be maintained (kept clean) . MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS CASE 5.995-PD-79 - TIME EXTENSION. Application by J. EPSTEIN MANAGEMENT COMPANY for a twelve-month time extension of a Planned Development District for 12 lots on 12.5 acres located 500 feet east of Bogert Trail , R-1-C Zone, Section 36. Planner (Evans) stated that the Planned Development District was submitted in 1976 and approved as a preliminary in 1981 and a final in 1982; that the map has been approved, and recorded and is in existence but construction has not begun on the Planned Development District and it has expired. He stated that much work has been done on the project from staff and con- sultants on an EIR; that staff is reviewing conditions and suggest adding a condition that a detailed slope restoration and landscape plan be is to submitted in conjunction with the grading permit so the site can be restored to its original state at the beginning of construction rather than waiting for a homeowners association to repair it (since there could be one phase or a series of houses) . He stated that the lots have defined building sites and that the lots are 12,000 sq. ft. ; that the grading plan is for the roadway only; that lots will be individually reviewed for grading. He informed the Commission that a Master Grading/Site Preparation Plan may be proposed and that retaining walls may be built with the pads for an upscale appearance for sales purposes and so that no scars appear on the hillside. He stated that the map is recorded and the property is ready for construction. M/S/C (Edgmon/Hough) approving a 12-month time extension for Case 5.995-PD- 79 subject to all original conditions of approval and one additional June 14, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 14 MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS (Continued) CASE- 5.995-PD-79 --TIME EXTENSION. (Continued) condition as follows: That a detailed slope restoration and landscape plan be submitted in conjunction with the grading permit. The expiration date will be July 5, 1990. Commissioner Whitney left. CASE 5.0348-CUP. Application by WILL KLEINDIENST for Desert Son-Shine for Commission review of expansion of office facilities (no exterior changes) for kindergarten/preschool facility at 1750 N. Sunrise Way, C-1 Zone, Section 1. Planner (Evans) stated that the use is operating under a CUP presently and the applicants want expansion into an adjoining area for an office and also for the addition of students and teachers; that the parking is adequate; that there was no input when the public hearing was originally held; and that a new hearing is not warranted. M/S/C (Olsen/Edgmon; Whitney absent) approving an expansion of office facilities (with no exterior changes) for Case 5.0348-CUP. ARCHITECTURAL APPROVAL ITEMS Approval of architectural cases is valid for two years. The approval granted must be exercised within that time period unless extended. CASE 20.108. Application by RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT for architec- tural review of a site plan for an auto race track northwesterly of Gene Autry Trail , south of I-10, Sphere of Influence. Planner (Evans) stated that subchanges have been made to the restudy site plan such as moving the auto service garage off Salvia Road but the AAC recommended another restudy feeling that the same concerns on setbacks and proportions are still in existence; that another concern is over the main identification sign which is 60 ft. above grade and 20 ft. in width with a digital copy display and which would require a variance for height. He stated that the applicants' model for the sign is a large group sign approved under a variance (which Rancho Mirage and Palm Desert opposed) , and that the AAC felt the sign should be restudied for proportions. He stated that the EIR is not final ; that the County Planning Commission will review the case on June 28 in Palm Desert; and that the public hearing will draw a large audience. Commissioner Olsen asked if County Commissioner Beadling felt that there had been adequate public hearings in Palm Springs. June 14, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 15 ARCHITECTURAL APPROVAL ITEMS (Continued) CASE- 20,108. (Continued) Planner replied that the entire County Planning Commission holds concerns about inadequate public hearings; that Palm Springs took a early strong decision in support of the project; that Commissioner Beading felt that the City decision makers have not had the opportunity to hear from Palm Springs residents; that the Palm Springs Council supported the application 5-0; that the County Commission feels that the project needs serious consideration because it will change the character of the area; that the City held one public hearing; that City residents have appeared before the County Commission to ask for denial even though the Council supported it; that Commissioner Beadling is listening to Palm Springs residents since she lives here; and that Palm Springs leader, business owners and racing enthusiasts support the project, but not the people living near the track who will be affected by the noise and whose quality of life may be threatened; that the County Commission has not discussed the project with the Council and feels that elected and appointed officials should be sent to the County meetings on the project (not staff) ; and that their attendance is needed to get be what will get the project approved by the County. He stated that staff has not worked with Council on strategy. Commissioner Dotson stated that he had abstained because his firm is involved in work for the adjoining property. Assistant City Attorney agreed that he should abstain because the proposed projec4r will have an effect on his source of income and is the basis for a conflict. M/S/C (Olsen/Hough; Dotson abstained; Whitney absent) for a restudy of the revised application noting the following: That previous site plan concerns have not been fully addressed. 3.0557 (MINOR) CONTINUED. Application by WINNERS for architectural approval of wrought iron grillwork and gated entry at 238 N. Palm Canyon Drive, C-B-D Zone, Section 15. Planner (Goodwin) stated that the application had been denied by the AAC in May and that the AAC recommended that the wrought iron be removed; that the grates are installed; and that the application was continued for the applicants to be present. She stated that the applicants did not attend the AAC meeting on June 12 nor were present at this meeting. M/S/C (Olsen/Dotson; Mills abstained; Whitney absent):" denying the application. June 14, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 16 ARCHITECTURAL APPROVAL ITEMS (Continued) TTM- 23557. Application by JOHN HACKER for Kenneth Hinsvark for architectural approval of a grading plan for a Tentative Tract Map to allow seven home sites on the southend of Camino Parocela between Fern Canyon/Belardo Roads, W-R-1-A Zone, Section 22. M/S/C (Olsen/Dotson; Whitney absent) continuing the application to June 28, 1989 at the applicant's request. I CONSENT ACTION AGENDA I CASE 3.0610. Application by BOB HOWARD for architectural approval of an addition to a single family home and complete landscaping at 588 La Mirada, R-1-A Zone, Section 22. Planner (Evans) stated that the proposed expansion is not against the mountain and will be seen by residents of the neighborhood; that the appli- cant has submitted a lot line adjustment for the expansion of the living room; that a 20 ft. setback for a 17 ft. 6 inch high structure is proposed; and that the AAC felt that the elevation should be pulled down either architecturally or physically. He described the addition and asked if the Commission felt the applicant should adhere to the Zoning Ordinance building height and setback requirements since the Commission has discre- tion in hillside areas. Chairman stated that the end elevation is a flat plane; is not residential in character; does not fit into the neighborhood; resembles a hugh ware- house even though the addition is set back. He stated that the elevation is a square box 17 feet high. M/S/C (Dotson/Edgmon; Whitney absent) for a restudy noting the following: 1. That elevations and massing be restudied. 2. That the building be designed to have a more residential character. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS CITY COUNCIL ACTIONS. Update of City Council actions. - TUMF (Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee) . Council approved the TUMF through CVAG for all projects including single-family residences. Fee is based on per trip basis to help with the regional transportation program and local concerns. The fee is not a panacea for all problems and each project will have to do mitigation improvements over and above the fees which will be approximately $800 per house as a flat fee. The fee will be applied to all cities in the valley participating in the program, however La Quinta and Coachella will not impose the fee and have given up their portion of the sales tax funds. These cities feel that since they are developing cities they would be paying more fees than other cities and most regional improvements are not in their cities whicfwill be penalized by not participating in the program. Fees will be equitable in application throughout the valley but most developers do not want it. Chairman stated that the Cities keep adding fees and they cost more than the land. June 14, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 17 MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS (Continued) CITY-COUNCIL -ACTIONS. (Continued) ``- - CASE 5.0400-ZTA (Adult- Entertainment, Off-Site Real Estate Signs, etc. ) . Second reading by the Council . COMMISSION/STAFF REPORTS4REQUESTS r~ea — CdFlya� Country ClubBike Trail Landscaping., Many letters have been received for the Commission from residents wanting to retain landscaping of the relocated bike trail . Staff has been working with the applicants to have a design program for landscaping that meets staff con- cerns. The landscaping was installed and $20,000 to $30,000 additional landscaping added that creates a tunnel along the bike trail . Staff has notified the owner that the landscaping is not approved; that the land- scaping will be on the June 28 agenda; and that the application will be controversial and many people will attend the meeting. The Commission should take a field trip to see the effect of the landscaping first-hand although staff has photos. The bikeway was moved into the equestrian trail which is not a good situation, and staff wants to keep views open to the golf course. The residents are upset because they see the auto park and traffic in Cathedral City from their homes. The developer refuses to remove the landscaping and may take the case to court. (Planning Director entered. ) Chairman appointed Commissioners Hough and Olsen to review the landscaping with staff. Commissioner Mills stated that he would go by him- self to review it. Municipal Golf Course Fencing. Homeowners on the course are upset with the inconsistency of fencing on the course since some residents have 30 inch walls with wrought iron on the top, some have nets, and some have no barriers. Planner (Evans) asked direction from the Commission stating that at the study session he felt the Commission did not want the Ordinance rewritten and wanted the golf course redesigned. He stated that the Parks & Recreation Commission feels that the Golf Course should remain as it is. Commissioner Edgmon stated that she felt that a golf course architect would be hired to review the course. Planner stated that the request has been relayed to the golf course management, but there is a budget constraint and a professional will probably not be hired. He stated that the Golf Course Superintendent does not want to change the course; that four fairways have problems; and that to redesign' them would be difficult but perhaps the tees could be redesigned to change slightly the direction of the balls. Commissioner Mills stated that the Commission direction was to change the tees which would solve some of the problems but not all . He stated that he was the applicant on the hotel which is asking for fencing and the hotel has to have a fence around its pool to obtain insurance because there is a pool is open to the golf course; and that although the insurance companies will not write insurance on unfenced hotel pools, they will write insurance on unfenced home pools. Chairman stated that any screening allowed should be uniform. Planner stated that opinions on screening are divided and that he had met with five people at the course, four of whom claim to have been hit by golf balls and who feel it is a safety problem. He stated that there are those who only want barriers and those who want security. Commissioner Olsen stated that the residents knew that they were on a golf course when they bought their homes. Planning Director stated that walls or hedges can only be 30 inches high on the golf course but that trees could be planted by the residents. Commissioner Olsen stated that the appearance of fencing is not what is wanted on a golf course. Chairman suggested ficus trees which are dense and have a mature height that will June 14, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 18 MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS (Continued) COMMISSION/STAFF REPORTS/REQUESTS. (Continued) stop golf balls. Commissioner Mills commented that fairway width is a problem wider fairways would lessen the problem. - Palm Springs Water Company Facility (Sphere of Influence) . Application to be reviewed by the Council on June 21. The County and the Desert Water Agency have been petitioned against extracting water from the desert and exporting it because the petitioners feel it is a bad precedent even though the amount of water is nominal for the particular project (but could become much more if other facilities apply) ; and that this particular concern was not expressed to the Commission and was not a major issue in the Planning Commission discussion. - Illegal Dumping at the Equestrian Center. Commissioner Dotson stated that a the confluence of Tahquitz and Whitewater the City is routinely dumping near the Equestrian Center and that it is asphalt and street sweepings in addition to fill . He requested that the Director of General Operations attend a Planning Commission Study Session to discuss the dumping since City does not allow anyone else to dump. Chairman stated that he was building a project in the area which would block the entrance to the site with a wall . Commissioner Dotson stated that the sweepings and other material were dumped to save fees but the dumping is now visible from Gene Autry Trail . Review of the Consent Agenda. Staff will review the consent agenda on the display board at the beginning of each Commission meeting. Commissioner Dotson stated he felt that it was an excellent way for the Commissioners to quickly review the projects on the agenda. ADDED STARTERS. (Determination of eligibility for consideration.) None. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Chairman adjourned the meeting at 3:50 p.m. 7 OR rA P LAMIN G D I R MT MDR/ml I i i PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES Council Chamber, City Hall June 28, 1989 • 1:30 p.m. ROLL CALL F-Y 1988 - 1989 Present Present Excused Absences Planning Commission This Meeting to Date to Date Larry Lapham, Chairman X 22 2 Gary Olsen X 20 4 Barbara Whitney X 19 5 Brent Hough X 22 2 Martha Edgmon - 20 4 Chris Mills X 20 2 Michael Dotson X 21 0 Staff Present Marvin D. Roos, Planning Director Siegfried Siefkes, Assistant City Attorney Douglas Evans, Planner Debra Goodwin, Planner Richard Patenaude , Planner Sherri Abbas, Planner Dave Forcucci , Planner Dean Lewis , Traffic Engineer Mary E. Lawler, Recording Secretary Architectural Advisory Committee - June 26, 1989 • Brent Hough, Chairman Will Kleindienst - William Johnson Mike Buccino Tom Doczi Reuel Young Chairman called the meeting to order at 1:30 p.m. M/S/C (Dotson/Hough; Edgmon Absent) approving minutes of June 14, 1989 with the following correction: Commissioner Edgmon was present (not absent) at the meeting. TRIBAL COUNCIL COMMENTS: During the month of July, the Tribal Council will conduct two Tribal Council Meetings; i .e. , July 11th and 25th. The next Regular Tribal Council Meeting will be on September 5, 1989 (There are no Meetings scheduled for August) . John Q. Adams , Tribal Planning Consultant, will be unable to provide comments for cases which may involve Indian Trust Lands and of which may be on the Palm Springs Planning Commission Agenda during the month of August; therefore, we hereby request that all matters affecting Indian Trust Lands be continued until such time as we commence with our regular Tribal Council meetings in September, 1989. REPORT OF POSTING AGENDA: The June 28, 1989 agenda was available for public access at the City Hall exterior bulletin board and the Planning Division Counter by p.m. , Friday, June 23, 1989.