Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1989/05/24 - MINUTES t PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES Council Chamber, City Hall May 24, 1989 1:30 p.m. ROLL CALL F-Y 1988 - 1989 Present Present Excused Absences Planning Commission This Meeting to Date to Date Larry Lapham, Chairman X 20 2 Gary Olsen X 18 4 Barbara Whitney X 17 5 Brent Hough X 20 2 Martha Edgmon - 19 3 Chris Mills X 18 2 Michael Dotson X 19 0 Staff Present Marvin D. Roos, Planning Director 'i Siegfried Siefkes, Assistant City Attorney Douglas Evans, Planner Debra Goodwin, Planner Sherri Abbas, Planner John Terell , Redevelopment Coordinator Amy Hodgett, Housing Coordinator Tracy Gunneman, Economic Development Dave Forcucci , Zoning Enfar-,cement Mary E. Lawler, Recording Seci*etary i Architectural Advisory Committee - May 22, 1989 Brent. Hough, Chairman Absent: Mike Buccino Will Kleindienst Tom Doczi William Johnson Reuel Young Jim Cioffi , alternate Chairman called the meeting to order at 1:30 p.m. M/S/C (Olsen/Hough) approving minutes of May 10, 1989 with the followi,ng corrections: Page 16, Paragraph 6; CASE 5.0511-PD-201. (700 unit timeshare/800 room hotel ) . Change 150 ft. to 1500 ft. Change 1500 Tnit timeshare to "700 unit timeshare/800 room hotel ". Page 13, Paragraph 3; LUP. Delete "although the revised Zoning Ordinance stated that fees were going to be charged" . Page 15, Paragraph 1; delete "staff"; add "theft" . REPORT OF POSTING AGENDA: The May 24, 1989 agenda was available for public access at the City Hall exterior bulletin board and the Planning Division Counter by 5:OO p.m. , Friday, May 19, 1989. -May 24, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 2 y CONSENT ACTION AGENDA Approval of architectural cases is valid for two years. The approval granted must be exercised within that time period unless extended. M/S/C (Olsen/Dotson; Edgmon absent) taking the following actions: CASE - 3.0547. Application by GEORGIO HERRERA for architectural approval of revised plans for single-family residence on Chino Canyon Road between Panorama/western end of road, R-1-A Zone, Section 3. I j Approved subject to the following conditions: i 1. That the fascia be replaced with rafter tails. 2. That the entry way be restudied. 3. That a sample of the decorative tile be submitted for approval . 4. That the colors be restudied. 5. That the canterra stone be utilized in the entry columns, capitals, banding under windows, planters in front and the seat on the jacuzzi . 6. That all recommendations of the Development Committee be met. CASE 3.0588. Application by RAYMOND HOWARD for architectural approval of a �., single-family residence at 780 Azalea Circle West, R-1-B Zone, Section 35. Approved subject to the following condition: That all recommendations of the Development Committee be met. CASE 5.0439-PD-189. Request by COMMUNITY CONSULTANTS CORPORATION for a retroactive nine-month time extension to December 2, 1989 for a Planned Development District to allow construction of a service/commercial/industrial complex on the north side of Ramon Road adjacent to Palm Springs Regional Airport, M-1 Zone (I .L.) , Section 18. (Ref. TTM 29396) Approved a nine-month retroactive time extension to December 2, 1989 subject to all original conditions of approval . Abstention: Mills TRIBAL COUNCIL COMMENTS After consideration of the recommendations of the Indian Planning Commission, the Tribal Council recommended approval of the request for a time extension to December 2, 1989, for PD-189. ti May 24, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 3 ' CONSENT AGENDA (Continued) SIGN - APPLICATION- (Continued) . Application by QUALITY PROJECT COORDINATORS for architectural approval of revised plans for main identification sign for Hotel 6 on S. Palm Canyon Drive, PD-187, Section 23. (Ref. Case 5.0437- PD-187) Approved as submitted. NB: Planning Director stated that the applicants have agreed to use the word "Hotel " on the sign rather than "Motel ". � Zoning Enforcement Officer stated that the vacancy sign on the Hotel 6 has been removed. SIGN APPLICATION. Application by QUIEL BROTHERS SIGN COMPANY for Palm Springs Public Storage Company for architectural approval of main identification sign for business at 1400 S. Gene Autry Trail , M-1 Zone, Section 20. Restudy noting the following: That channel letters be considered on the building face. SIGN APPLICATION. Application by SUPERIOR ELECTRICAL SIGNS for Quality Inn formerly Seven Springs Hotel ) for architectural approval of a main identi- fication sign for Hotel on E. Palm Canyon Drive, west of Sunrise Way, R-3 Zone, Section 26. Approved subject to the following conditions: That the cabinet be raised to show green relief. CASE 3.0591 (MINOR) . Application by SEVEN LAKES COUNTRY CLUB HOA for archi- tectural approval of chain link security fence near Hwy 111, RGA (8) Zone, Section 30. Planning Director stated that the fence is below the highway and hidden by trees. Approved as submitted. CASE 3.0593. Application by JAMES C. MASON for architectural approval of mechanical equipment screening for a 4-plex apartment complex at 2690 Junipero, R-2 Zone, Section 3. Approved subject to the following condition: That the screen be steel framed with baked enamel metal siding (to be approved by staff) . -May 24, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 4 ` CONSENT AGENDA (Continued) TTM -23928. Application by KWL ASSOCIATES for Palm Springs Regional Airport for- architectural approval of grading plan for a tentative tract map for industrial uses on the northwest corner of Farrell Drive/Tachevah Drive, 0- 5 Zone, Section 12. Approved as submitted. j ITEMS REMOVED FROM CONSENT ACTION AGENDA Approval of architectural cases is valid for two years. The approval granted must be exercised within that time period unless extended. CASE 3.0481 (MINOR) Continued. Initiation by the CITY OF PALM SPRINGS for archi- tectural approval of revised landscape plans for a median island on N. Indian Avenue between Las Vegas/Tramview Roads, "0" Zone, Section 34. PlanningDirector stated that the sign will be installed at the h 9 Wort end of Indian Avenue and has been redesigned significantly with a stucco coating over the block. M/S/C (Olsen/Dotson; Edgmon absent) approving the application subject to the following condition: That the flat section of the wall be stuccoed. CASE 3.0557 (MINOR) Continued. Application by WINNERS for architectural approval of wrought iron window grates and gated entry at 238 N. Palm Canyon Drive, C-B-D Zone, Section 15. M/S/C (Whitney/Hough; Edgmon absent) tabling the item to the end of the meeting for the applicant to be present. M/S/C (Hough/Olsen; Edgmon/Whitney absent; Mills abstained) removing the item from the table and continuing it to June 14 for the applicant to be present. CASE- 3.0516 (MINOR) . Application by EDWARD MCGRATH for architectural approval of mechanical equipment roof screening and outdoor dining for Marie Callendar's Restaurant, Desert Fashion Plaza, N. Palm Canyon Drive, south of Amado Road, C-B-D Zone, Section 15. Planner (Abbas) stated that the item was restudied at the May 10 meeting for Commission to review roof screening; that the screening goes across the front of the building and is five feet tall with vertical louvers painted to match the building; and that the AAC recommended that the southern end of the screen be extended into the common wall with Saks. She stated that the AAC recommended approval of both pedestrian concepts of a 7-foot side- May 24, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 5 ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA (Continued) CASE 3:0516 -(MINOR) . (Continued) walk and the "Heroes" walk which will be individual blocks with names imprinted on them in front of the Marie Callendars Building; that the walk extends into the public right-of-way and will require Council approval ; and that the outdoor dining will also require Council approval . I Commissioner Dotson asked about the definition of "Heroes". Ed McGrath, 969 Tuxedo Circle, Palm Springs, owner of Marie Callendars, Palm Springs, stated that real "Heroes" (both dead and alive) not just celebrities, will be invited to put their names in a small block in the sidewalk; that a Committee will be formed including one City Council person, one Debartolo Corporation person, and local residents to select the heroes; and that postcards will be available in the restaurant for suggestions for names in the walk. Commissioner Dotson asked about the committee being under control of Marie Callendars and choosing the names to be imprinted into a public right-of- way. Mr. McGrath stated that the committee will make the decision based on much input; that the heroes would sign their names and add a small design or something special to the m, and that a small bookl et would be prepared describing the walk and that proceeds will go to the people of Palm Springs. Commissioner Olsen stated that he was concerned about the width of the sidewalk because if the planters are moved to the columns a 7-foot width would be left which is too narrow. He stated that the width might have to be increased (which could be done later) . Commissioner Dotson stated that he was not comfortable with the "Walk of Fame" being in a public right-of-way. Planner explained that the two walks are different patterns of circulation and that the "Walk of Fame" would be 70 ft. long (the length of the front of the restaurant) . Mr. McGrath suggested a 10 ft. sidewalk width. Chairman stated that he was uncomfortable with the precedent of having a particular establishment put names in a sidewalk because other businesses might want to the same thing and having private individuals decide what is in the sidewalk is dangerous for the treatment of a public sidewalk. Planning Director stated that the Council will make the final decision; that there has been much interest in having a Hollywood type of sidewalk program; and that some of the downtown sidewalks are different (stamped concrete has been used, as an example). May 24, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 6 ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA (Continued) CASE -3.05I6 (MINOR) . (Continued) Chairman stated that the color and texture of sidewalks have been reviewed individually and to allow some businesses to have them and others not is unfair; and that a whole section of Palm Canyon should be allowed to be treated differently or no portion at all . Commissioner Dotson stated that he would like to see continuity in sidewalk treatment; that there might be liability because the walks will have small depressions in them; and the 7 ft. is too narrow. I suggested a I Commissioner Whitney su joint study session with the Council on an overview of the downtown sidewalks. i j Commissioner Hough stated that the Council will review the sidewalk anyway. i Commissioner Mills recommended that theupper roof on Marie Callendar's be screened. M/S/C (Olsen/Hough; Edgmon absent; Whitney dissented) approving the appli- cation subject to the followingconditions: II 1. That the lower roof screen extend into the common wall with the Sak's store and return the southern end of the screen past the first piece of equipment. 2. That the sidewalk width be 10 feet. 3. That the upper roof be screened. 4. That the concept of the "Hero" walk be restudied. 5. That all recommendations of the Development Committee be met. PUBLIC HEARINGS CASE 5.0512-GPA (Continued) . Initiation by the CITY OF PALM SPRINGS for revisions to the Housing Element as a portion of the City's General Plan (Ref. Case 5.0132-GPA) . (Commission response to written comments on draft Negative Declaration; no comments; action.) Recommendation: That the Commission order the filing of a Negative Declaration and give final approval to the revised Housing Element. Planning Director stated that the revised Housing Element was reviewed at two study sessions and a public hearing; that a revision is mandated every five years by the State; that it is mandated to be approved before July 1; that the goals and policies section is the objective section of the ele- ment; and that the State mandates a strong effort to fulfill the goals and policies. He stated that specific programs for rezoning properties for a -May 24, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 7 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) CAS-E 5:0512-GPA. (Continued) higher density have been deleted from the original draft; that the Redevelopment Agency will pursue land banking to keep land prices down; and that innovative zoning techniques will be used. He stated that the Tribal Council supports the revised element. i Chairman declared the hearing open; there being no appearances the hearing was closed. i Commissioner Dotson asked if conditions of approval could be developed for employers of low and middle income workers to provide housing. Planning Director stated that on discretionary approval of projects condi- tions can be especially strong, but that in a right-of-zone development the City cannot be as strong; that under an environmental assessment a program for affordable housing can be -mandated for employers to provide this housing. Housing Coordinator (Hodgett) stated that the City is discussing with CVAG a regional housing approach; that some cities are charging fees to developers in order that low cost housing be provided; and that either a fee or actual housing provision at the developer's choice is the best approach. Planning Director stated that the City has never conditioned a project to require affordable housing. Assistant City Attorney stated that in an old court case the City of San Francisco was allowed to charge a transit fee to a developer of a large office building because the building employees impacted the transit system and that the fee was upheld by the courts. He stated that a city can be quite aggressive if a tie can be established between an entitlement and conditions requiring mitigation. M/S/C (Olsen/Mills; Edgmon absent) ordering the filing of a negative declaration and approving revisions to the Housing Element based on the following findings: 1. That the City is mandated by State law to update its housing element every five years with July 1, 1989 being the current target for updating. 2. That the City has worked aggressively over the last five years to implement the goals and policies of the last housing element adopted in 1984. 3. That the City is committed to developing a balanced program of housing for all segments of our population. May 24, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 8 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) CASE 5:-0512-G-PA. (Continued) TRIBAL COUNCIL COMMENTS The draft Housing Element of the City of Palm Springs dated April 1989 was considered by the Tribal Council at its meeting of May 23, 1989. After consideration of the recommendations of the Indian Planning Commission, the Tribal Council took the following actions. 1. Endorsed the City's basic goal to ensure that all residents of the City have decent, safe, sanitary and affordable housing regardless of income. 2. Concurred with the specific goals, policies and objectives outlined in the draft document. 3. Recommended that the goals and objectives be quantifiable to the fullest extent possible, and that the be monitored p Y mo tore on a continuous basis, including a formal review and evaluation at least annually. 4. Strongly recommended that efforts be focused on providing meaningful incentives to those members of the development community who elect to participate in programs to provide new affordable housing. CASE 5.0509-CZ / TTM 24325. Application by LAPHAM CONSTRUCTION COMPANY for ..� change of zone from R-1-AH to R-1-C (which conforms to City's General Plan) and to consider a Tentative Tract Map to subdivide approximately 10 acres into 30 parcels at the east end of Escoba Drive, extended, R-1-AH Zone, Section 19. (Commission response to written comments on draft Negative Declaration; no comments; action.) Chairman abstained; Vice-Chairman presided. Recommendation: That the Commission order the filing of a Negative Declaration and approve the case and map. Planner (Abbas) stated that the City Council in 1982 approved a zone change from R-1-C to R-1-A-H and that the applicant is now requesting a zone change to revert the zoning back to the original R-1-C designation and that the requested change is in conformance with the Zoning of the surrounding properties and the General Plan designation of low density. She stated that the staff is not recommending architectural review of the tract since architectural review will be probably be removed from flat lands not on major thoroughfares; and that Escoba will extend to the equestrian center. She stated that primary project access is on Escoba; that asphalt has been installed from the end of Escoba to the Center. Commissioner Mills requested that the street plan be reviewed. Chairman declared the hearing open . May 24, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 9 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) CASE-5:0509-C7 —.TTM--243-25. (Continued) Engineer, stated that the Bob Lolito, KWL Associates, 722 Eugene, Project En 9 9 conditions are satisfactory. He stated that the pump station will be owned by the City and is designed to City specifications and maintained by the City, and that landscaping was not discussed but will be in the future. Herman Oustendorf, 3595 Ridgeview Circle, stated that he was not in opposi- tion but wanted the Commission to know that the statement in the checklist of the Environmental Assessment that no damage would be done to the animals in the area is false since there are many small animals and reptiles and they would be endangered. He stated that the animals should be moved from I� the area. Ruth Sheehan, 3554 Escoba, asked about the entrance to the project and explained that there is much traffic now on Escoba because of the Wessman project and if 30 more houses are added the traffic will be worse. She stated that trucks including City trucks constantly travel down Escoba to dump asphalt at the Equestrian Center without real consideration for homes along the streets. She requested speed bumps and an entrance on Sonora so that all traffic would not be carried on Escoba. Grace Ostendof, 3595 Ridgeview Circle, stated that she was also against the project since motorcycl i sts&heavy gravel trucks use the street now and that traffic will increase. Vice-chairman stated that most of the trucks are not connected with the City and the homeowners should call the City about the traffic. Commissioner Dotson asked if the trucks were dumping into the wash. Mrs. Ostendorf stated that they were dumping farther east and some are City trucks. She stated that she hoped that the street would not become a truck route. Vice There being no further appearances; Chairman declared the hearing closed. Commissioner Dotson questioned the loss of R-1-A-H Zoning since there is little left in the City, especially next to the trails and the equestrian center. He asked if there had been interest or demand in developing the zoning. Planning Director stated that there has been no interest in developing equestrian sites; that the site had been originally scheduled to have equestrian lots since they are next to the equestrian center but that there was no interest; that the equestrian developments have been discussed with developers to no avail because of no market; and that people prefer to leave their horses in a stable and live elsewhere. He stated that several equestrian lots behind St. Theresa's Church have developed without eques- trian amenities. Commissioner Mills asked if the screening of the sewer facility will be done by the developer or the City. �"� Planner stated that it had not been discussed. -May 24, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 10 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) CASE- 5;0S09-CZ / -TTM- 24325. (Continued) Commissioner Mills commented that the acoustics of the station should be controlled as well as the landscaping. Planner (Evans) stated that the equipment is above ground and housed in a gatehouse type of construction and will blend in with its surroundings. Planning Director suggested that the design be a condition of the land- scaping and reviewed by staff and that the site Zoning when the Wessman houses were constructed was R-1-C. Commissioner Hough stated that the Zoning was going back to the original R- 1-C; that there should not be speed bumps because of liability; that he sympathized with the residents who have to contend with the traffic. Commissioner Dotson stated that there is no other viable access besides Escoba because of the location of the center, the surrounding development, and the location of the wash. i M/S/C (Hough/Dotson; Whitney/Lapham abstained; Edgmon absent) ordering the filing of a Negative Declaration and approving the Zone Change and Map based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions: Findings 1. That the proposed Change of Zone from R-1-AH to R-1-C and proposed tract map are consistent with the intent of the General Plan. 2. That the proposed Change of Zone and Tentative Tract Map will not have a detrimental effect upon the surrounding environment. Any possible impacts have been mitigated through the conditions of approval . 3. That the site is adequate in size and shape (10 acres) to accommodate the allowable uses in the proposed zoning district. 4. That the site is served by Escoba Drive which is adequate in size to accommodate the amount of traffic generated by the proposed zoning district. 5. That the conditions imposed are necessary to insure that the proposal will not be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare. Conditions: 1. That the Development Committee conditions dated May 11, 1989, be met. 2. That the mitigation measures of the Environmental Assessment con- tained in Case 5.0509-CZ and TTM 24325 be met. 3. That staff review the landscape and architecture of the pump station. May 24, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 11 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) CASE- 5-.-043-8--M-I-SC. Initiation of a Notice of Preparation of an EIR and an Initial Study/Environmental Assessment by the CITY OF PALM SPRINGS for the Palm Springs Regional Airport Master Plan Update and Federal Aviation Regula- tions Part 150, Noise Compatibility Study. (The Master Plan update evaluates the current and projected aviation demand over a future 20-year time frame and includes a phased schedule for airport improvements.) Planner (Evans) stated that an EIR will address Airport Master Plan updates and associated Federal Aviation Administration requirements on noise, terminal and taxiway improvements, the general aviation parallel runway, the new control tower, and additional facilities. He described the 45 day review period and stated that government agencies, local interest groups and local agencies will be sent the EIR and invited to respond regarding concerns; that there will be another review of the draft document; and that j the final phase will be preparation of the final EIR and Commission will be li asked to certify the EIR as complete and approve it. He stated that the purpose at the meeting is informational and that the airport consultant on the draft EIR is Pete Marwick Company which are specialists in airport projects andhave prepared EIR's across the Country. He stated that the EIR would be subject to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) which is similar to CEQA. He asked that the Commission take public comment and give concerns to be addressed and that the document will be an EIR; and that an EIS is not required under NEPA. Al Smoot, Transportation and Energy Director, stated that the noise study has been adopted by the Federal Government; that the master plan update is an update of the 1983 plan and has a series of projects. He explained that �..- the improvements finished are those indicated in the Master Plan adopted in the 1970's such as the Aircraft Parking P Ram and expansion of the terminal buildingd an that the most controversial is the general aviation airport runway which is 4,700 ft. long and designed for only general aviation air- craft which will be on the east side of the main runway. He stated that the 20 year development is based on the traffic numbers of past types of aircraft and the noise study predicatd on it. He stated that the noise study was two years in preparation with much public input and addressed concerns of the public, including the major concern of airport noise; that the objective was the reduction of noise around the airport including engine runups at night for maintenance purposes which was alleviated by a "hush house" on the east side of the airport. He stated that complaints have decreased since the hush house was built and that the noise wall on the northwest side of the airport is being bid presently. He explained that zoning regulatory type of measures such as non-suit covenants and navigation easements to protect buyers and to protect access to the airport have been instituted and that operational methods have also reduced noise, such as thrust reduction for departures of commercial aircraft in which the aircraft reduces thrust at 1500 feet and turns power back on at the wash area to reduce noise which is a common practice at major airports in the country. He stated that the Noise Element will be in the General Plan and take the place of the old Technical Report. Commissioner Olsen asked about phase out of the noisier aircraft. May 24, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 12 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) CASE 5:0438-MISC. (Continued) Transportation Director stated that the oldest noisy planes (the 707's) have been phased out but that there is no mandatory phase out for the 727's or 737's which are stage two aircraft and make up 45% of the aircraft fleet. He stated, however, that Federal efforts and stress on the planes will remove the the 727's and 737's and that there is no noise standard for the Lear jets. He stated that the runway is 8500 ft. for arrival of air- craft and 7000 ft. for departure. Ron Tulis, Pete Marwick Company, San Francisco, stated that the initial study is in conformance with the City of Palm Springs regulations and with CEQA; that several projects qualify for Federal funding, including the General Aviation Runway on which an environmental assessment must be per- formed; that the initial study addressed 21 different categories of which 8 had the potential for environmental impact and will be studied in depth in the draft EIR/EA; that noise impacts will be reviewed in five year periods; that the noise impacts of the General Aviation runway will be addressed; and that the document has been sent to many agencies for input. There being no further appearances; Chairman declared the hearing closed. Planner (Evans) stated that the Tribal Council will review the document within the 45 day time period and give comments and that the Palm Springs Townhomes Board of Directors have several areas of concern including angle of arrivals11 departure, elevations: altitude, and the noise which the board has perceived since initiation of the new angle and departure methods; `�-- requests that single event noise levels and what is heard versus the standard measuring system. evaluation for noise be considered; that future expansions which envision >� ; an international airport potential_;be explored and its long range impacts. He stated that the board also stated . that the parallel runway, which relieves general aviation traffic, may have an impact because of increase in commercial carriers on the main runways and that the Noise Element was also mentioned by the Board as a goal for preserving the low noise atmosphere of the City.He'-explained that the letter will be given to the consultants to address these concerns. Commissioner Dotson asked the reasons for initiation of an environmental assessment at this point since the improvements may not be able to be funded until the document is approved. Transportation Director stated that the reason for the order of approval the Master Plan is that the document is adopted by the Airport Commission first and the reason for the assessment of the runway is because it will be constructed within 2 years and it is necessary to complete the process before construction begins. He stated that Airport staff is asking for Commission approval once instead of many times during the process and that updated information is necessary in the General Plan for Federal approval . He stated that the Master Plan is usually evaluated every 22 years. Commissioner Dotson asked about promoting a combination of General Aviation and commercial aircraft since most airports are moving away from this con- cept. -May 24, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 13 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) CASE--5-i0438-MISC. (Continued) Transportation Director stated that the p problem exists now at the airport and that the Federal Government would not allow elimination of either com- mercial or general aviation since the government requires facilities for all types of aviation without discrimination. Planner recommended that any Commission concerns be stated and that the Commission review pages 10 through 17 of the document and consider the yes, no and maybe answers. (Yes - significant impact; Maybe - some question; No - no significant impact) . He stated that if the Commission concurs that the checklist is adequate, staff will proceed. Commissioner Dotson stated that he would encourage that the Palm Springs Townhouse Board of Directors concerns be addressed in the study and that the language used be understandable to the layman since noise issues are difficult to understand. i Commissioner Dotson made a motion for continuance for two weeks for further Commission review and additional public input and more notices in the news- paper. Chairman stated that no action should be taken and there is no reason to continue since staff is just asking for input. Commissioner Dotson stated that he was protecting his future rights to have input. Planner stated that there will be 30 days for the Commission to provide input and that staff will address any Commission concerns; and that the public hearing could be continued for additional public input. He stated that the notice of preparation was published but that there was no comment, and that continuance would not slow the process. M/S/C (Dotson/Hough; Edgmon absent) continuing the public hearing to June 14. TRIBAL COUNCIL COMMENTS The Tribal Council acknowledged receipt of the Notice of Preparation of a Draft EIR and supplemental material dated May 17, 1989, relative to the Noise Compatibility Program and Master Plan Update for the Palm Springs Regional Airport. In view of the large acreage of both vacant and developed trust land in proximity to the project site, the Tribal Council expressed its intent to provide input as to the scope and content of the environmental document within the 45-day response time referenced in the N.O.P. -May 24, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 14 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) CASE 5�0476-C-7. Application by JOHN NEVINS & MELVIN JENSEN for a change of zone from R-2/R-1 (Multi- and Single- Family Residential ) to "P" (Professional ) on N. Sunrise Way between Andreas Road/Luring Drive, Section 13. (Commission response to written comments on draft Negative Declaration; no comments; action.) Planner (Evans) stated that staff's recommendation would be to direct staff to prepare a General Plan Amendment study to consider changing I.4 to "P" on the property or deny the application if the Commission does .not wish to consider a change at this time and that staff has received some correspon- dence on the application. He stated that the site is awkward with the current zoning because of two zones in the frontage along the street and that an office complex could be considered under a CUP. He stated that two letters had been received in opposition and a phone call and letter were in support. Planning Director stated that public utilities can locate in any zone under j a CUP as they have across Sunrise. Planner stated that the noise of traffic will be buffered by the construc- tion of buildings. Discussion followed on the type of development most appropriate to the area. Commissioner Mills stated that access could be off Sunrise or Andreas, and that it would be difficult to build an office building on the small prop- erty although it would be a more compatible use than multi-family. Planner stated that the offices would back onto the single-family residential area. Chairman declared the hearing open. James Cioffi , 700 E. Tahquitz, project architect, stated that there is little use for the property as R-2; that it has limited access off Andreas and is an odd shaped parcel ; that a small professional office building will be in keeping with the surrounding area; that he felt the concerns of the residents of the R-1 area are not serious because the noise can be buffered from Sunrise; that the use will be from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. and far less impacts will occur than in multi-family uses. John Lake, 140 Luring Drive, the owner, stated that the reason for the zone change is for a dental office with hours between 7 a.m. and 5 p.m. , except for a few emergencies; that the primary concern is the neighborhood; that traffic will be kept to a minimum to protect the neighbors; and that he has children who will be practicing in the building for the next 25 years. Jeannette Delman, 226 Luring Drive, owner of property behind the proposed zone change area, stated that she had bought the property thinking it would be residential but has put it on the market for personal reasons and that a buyer withdrew his offer after he checked and found out that the land across the street might become professional . She stated that the rezoning would destroy the residential quality of the neighborhood; and that she was May 24, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 15 ` PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) CASE--5-i0476-CZ. (Continued) protesting the zone change because it would cause a financial disaster for property in the area and that access would face her house on Luring because of difficulty of ingress and egress from Andreas. jThere being no further appearances; Chairman declared the hearing closed. I Planner stated that the two parcels have 200 ft. of frontage each (on i Sunrise north of Andreas) . Commissioner Dotson asked if access could be provided on Sunrise if the two parcels were combined. Commissioner Olsen stated that after hearing the applicant speak and knowing the neighborhood he felt that a good professional building would be better in the neighborhood than an apartment house which would be active 7 days a week. Commissioner Hough agreed, and stated that in the future the building would be a benefit to the neighborhood although he sympathized with buyers dis- trust of the rezoning. Planner stated that the frontage on Sunrise is 220 feet and that the north property line would line up with the driveway across the street (gas com- pany) ; that alternative driveways have been reviewed and will be further studied; and that the site plan is preliminary only and will not be dis- cussed. Commissioner Mills commented that a well-designed professional building will be better than three single-family homes; that access should be off Sunrise or Andreas (not Luring) and that all landscaping should have a residential appearance. Planning Director stated that the action should be on a General Plan Amend- ment study and that the issues of a planned development district, circula- tion, street alignment, and landscaping will be reviewed in the study. Commissioner Whitney stated that on E. Palm Canyon there are commercial uses across the street from residential , that it is livable with land- scaping and that a professional building is much more desirable than resi- dential building. Commissioner Dotson asked if the application could be a Planned Development District in lieu of a change of zone. Planning Director replied that the application direction would be deter- mined in the General Plan Amendment Study. M/S/C (Olsen/Hough; Edgmon absent) removing Case 5.0476-CZ from the agenda for preparation of a General Plan Amendment Study. CASE 5.0511-PD-201. Application by INTERCAL PSCC for a Notice of Preparation of an EIR and an Initial Study/Environmental Assessment for a planned develop- ment district to allow construction of an 800-room resort hotel and a 700- May 24, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 16 ` PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) CASE 5:051-1--PD-201. (Continued) unit timeshare project on N. Sunrise Way between the Whitewater Wash/San Rafael (extension) , 0-5-W/0-5 Zones , Section 36. Recommendation: That the application be removed from the agenda for staff preparation of a General Plan Amendment Study. Planner (Abbas) explained that the application is for a 700 unit time share and an 800 room resort hotel at the north end of Sunrise Way; that the project wraps around the Palm Springs Country Club Golf Course and includes several amenities and has a peak roof height of 114 ft. She stated that the proposed zone includes continuation of Sunrise Way to the Mid-Valley Parkway along the Whitewater Wash; that the project will have three entrances and a three story parking structure and that it may include a golf course although no details have been submitted. Planner (Evans) stated that this is the same process as on the airport E.I .R. with a 45 day review period now underway and a draft EIR prepared; that staff determined early that an EIR would be required; that a General Plan Amendment, a Zone Change and a Planned Development District in lieu of a Change of Zone will also be required. He stated that the site is open space presently and designated Airport Noise and Blowsand in the General Plan; that an amendment to the Master Plan of Sewers is now being evaluated; that some changes to the Master Plan of Circulation may be required because of its location and amount of traffic; and that hydrology, drainage and alignment of the Whitewater River dike will be studied. He stated that significant impacts will be on air quality, noise generated by the project, roadway noise, traffic, noise generated by the amphi- theater, noise from the airport and raceway. He stated that the raceway will affect the property and mitigation measures will be required; and that there will be a visual impact from the highrise. He stated a review of the housing situation for approximately 1,000 employees will be done; that most of the parking is at grade but a two story parking structure, sunken one- half below grade is proposed, that the project does not comply with high- rise setback requirements; and that the height is above the highrise ordinance of 60 ft. since a portion will be at 75 ft. and a peak at 114 ft. He stated that staff analysis will clarify the issues; and that the purpose of the hearing is to seek public input. He stated that if the Commission feels that there is merit to the project, staff should be directed to pre- pare a General Plan Amendment Study. Randy Jefferson, Los Angeles, project architect, stated that the concept is to have a high quality destination resort; that the project massing has been studied and the buildings staggered in height from 1 story to 7; that the project will be an introduction to Palm Springs; that the wind issue will be deflected by the design of the buildings and substantial land- scaping; and that the project will draw a good clientele. Commissioner Dotson stated that he could not see any one-story elements on the model . i Mr. Jefferson explained that the tennis club is one-story; that the intent of the massing is to allow the project to show the panorama of the mountains; that the 114 ft. height is only at one point with a balance of the buildings massing at 7 stories. He stated that the golf course is May 24, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 17 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) CASE- 5:0611-PD-201. (Continued) several hundred feet away (with houses at 1500 feet) ; and that there will be dense landscaping on a portion of the golf course so that the residential area will not be seen. Commissioner Olsen asked about mitigation for airport noise. Dale Stein, project general partner, stated that in reviewing the Part 150 Noise Study a minimal amount of airport noise in indicated; that a decibel meter reading on the project will be taken; and that the project is working with the airport on noise. Ron Herisko, 2540 A Whitewater Club Drive, Palm Springs Country Club Phase III , stated that Phase III is adjacent to the golf course on the southeast; that the hotel will break the skyline view of the residents; that the project is elevated more than the. Phase III development; that he heard that the developer may purchase the existing Palm Springs Country Club golf course; that homeowners at the Country Club have a vested interest that the golf course remain a golf course; that if the hotel developer purchases the golf course, easements for a road through the Palm Springs Country Club for all phases of the Country Club development will be affected; that the Commission should be aware that there may be an impact on many more residents than. are affected by the hotel development only. Charles Hagan,_. 1330 Porter Avenue, Los Angeles, owner of 3 parcels affected by the development, stated that the 7 story hotel and the wind- break will affect his property. Planner, in reply to Commission Dotson's question, stated that the seven story sections of the building will be 75 ft. high. Chairman stated that the two story portion is 114 ft. at the peak with the highest part of the massing at 75 ft. Planning Director explained that there are zoning provisions that allow 100 ft. height on Indian Land and that City ordinances allows 60 plus 15 ft. for a penthouse; that the entire High-Rise Ordinance is now under a planned development district with guidelines for projects on a case by case basis; that the nearest residential units are at Golden Sands Mobilehome Park on N. Sunrise, 300 ft. away; that there is a substantial buffer toward the mobilehome park; that the closest home is in Whitewater Country Club which is hidden by windbreaks of 40 to 60 ft. high; and that if the golf course is purchased, it will be added to the application and remain a golf course. Commissioner Hough stated that he did not believe the applicants would eliminate the golf course even if they bought it since it would be a desired amenity for the hotel . M/S/C (Olsen/Whitney; Edgmon absent; Mills abstained) removing the applica- tion from the agenda for preparation of a General Plan Amendment Study. Commissioners Mills and Whitney left. -May 24, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 18 PUBLIC COMMENTS - None. ITEMS REMOVED FROM CONSENT ACTION AGENDA Approval of architectural cases is valid for two years. The approval granted must be exercised within that time period unless extended. CASE -3.0570. Application by ROMABO ENTERPRISES for architectural approval an an industrial building at 1290 Valdivia Way (between Compana/Tachevah Drive) , R-1-P Zone, Section 7. (Commission response to written comments on draft Negative Declaration; no comments; action.) Planner (Goodwin) stated that there is only a 15 ft. driveway and the fire department requires 25 ft. ; that the applicant will install Knox boxes on gates in the back of the building as a mitigative measure; that the M-1 Zoning requires a 5 ft. landscape buffer along any property lines not adjacent to the streets; and that the AAC recommended banding around the rear of the building. M/S/C (Olsen/Hough; Whitney/Mills/Edgmon absent) approving the application subject to the following condition: 1. That the banding be carried around the rear of the building. 2. That all recommendations of the Development Committee be implemented. 3. That no outdoor stage be allowed on the site. CASE 3.0580. Application by JOHN ARGYROS for architectural approval of an 81- seat restaurant on Palm Canyon Drive between El Alameda/Tachevah Drive, C-1 Zone, Section 10. (Commission response to written comments on draft Negative Declaration; no comments; action.) Chairman explained that he had to abstain, but that he would remain to form a quorum; Vice-Chairman presided. M/S/C (Hough/Dotson; Whitney/Mills/Edgmon absent; Lapham abstained) ordering the filing of a Negative Declaration and approving the application subject to the following condition: That all recommendations of the Development Committee be implemented. CASE -3.0582. Application by ROBERT RIDDELL for architectural approval of a single-family residence at 1001 Andreas Palms Drive, W-R-1-B Zone, Section 35. Commissioner Hough stated that the landscaping should be reviewed because citrus trees do not give much relief to the site. May 24, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 19 ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA (Continued) CASE--3:0582. (Continued) �- M/S/C (Olsen/Dotson; Whitney/Mills/Edgmon absent) approving the application subject to the following conditions: 1. That the landscape plans be reviewed and approved by staff. 2. That all recommendations of the Development Committee be implemented. CASE- TTM 23557. Application by JOHN HACKER for Kenneth Hinsvark for architec- tural approval of a grading plan for a Tentative Tract Map for seven home sites on the south end of Camino Parocela between Fern Canyon/Belardo Roads, W-R-1A Zone, Section 22. M/S/C (Olsen/Hough; Whitney/Mills/Edgmon absent) continuing the application to June . 14 for the applicant to be present. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS CASE 20.113 (Continued) . Application by RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT for Commission review of a Conditional Use Permit for a water extraction facility (Palm Springs Water Company) at the intersection of Hwy 111/I-10, Sphere-of-Influence. Planner (Evans) explained that the building is a large warehouse which will bottle Coachella Valley water as a mineral water and will have plastic press machines to make the bottles. Chairman commented that it was unusual to see a well-designed building in the county. Commissioner Dotson requested that a redemption stamp be placed on the bottles so that they can be redeemed and asked if the applicant pays for recharging the water supply. Planner stated that he would have to find out from the Desert Water Agency. Commissioner Olsen said he like the idea of having nothing on the roof and that perhaps come creative rock work could be used. M/S/C (Olsen/Hough; Whitney/Mills/Edgmon) approving the application subject to the following conditions: 1. That no roof mounted mechanical equipment or that the equipment be completely screened by the roof structure. 2. That a rock work design on the roof be considered. 3. That recycling redemption stamps be placed on the bottles if possible. May 24, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 20 MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS (Continued) CASE 5:0312-MI5C:-K. Application by US WINDPOWER for WECS 75 to allow construction of 277 wind turbines on property located between I-10/Hwy 111, �- east of Whitewater, Sphere of Influence. Planner (Evans) stated that the project was reviewed by the Commission several times; that the applicant is requesting a zone change request; that the County approved a zone change to Wind Energy (WE) ; that wind turbines will be placed on the site; that the Commission should address the best alignment of the machines; and that the completed EIR is a very adequate and factual summary of the project. Chairman stated that he had discussed energy output of the turbines with Edison as it applies to the area and all of the figures have not been given to him but Edison indicated that they are almost unmeasurable because the output is so small . Planner stated that it was less than .5 of 1% but does service a substantial number of homes. He discussed the project location and stated that the project will; fill in the gap on the narrowest portion of San Gorgonio Pass; and that 277 turbines in north-south rows are pro- posed. He noted concerns as follows: 1. That the Zone Change was not included in the original Change of Zone .request and that staff recommended denial of the Zone Change because it is next to I-10. 2. That the turbines should be moved out of the foreground to a middle ground. �.,.• 3. That the dike proposed be eliminated since grading will create a visual scar and a blowsand problem for the on-site workers and in operation of the turbines. He stated that staff recommended that Commission consider reducing the density of the project from 9 to 5 rows and a 1/3 mile setback from I-10 maintained; that at an angle a layer of turbines will be seen; that setbacks of 1/3 mile would be better than fewer turbines even if reduced from 277 to 163 in number. Wayne Hoffman, U.S. Wind Power, Livermore, California, stated that the Company has become the largest wind energy company in the world and pro- vides power to one-fourth million people and that there have been change in the industry with only one U.S. company left (U.S. Windpower) that manufac- tures wind turbines of any size; that his company operates these machines also in Solano County; that the turbines operate 96% of the time at 30% capacity; that in the altamount pass 75% of the energy is generated between May and September (26 million hours of producing) ; that Edison has to pay for a certain amount of energy; that a prototype is being developed by his company; that the Palm Springs area is one of the prime wind resources in the world; and that the Whitewater Hill site is the best wind producing wind farm in the world. He stated that his firm's proposal was submitted in 1984 and thoroughly reviewed,;t1flettechnology of U.S. Windpower is worth selling; that the blades of the machines maximize the wind; that U.S. Windpower manufactures, constructs, designs, and operates its own systems; that the machines have only begun to be marketed; that the machines are May 24, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 21 MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS (Continued) CASE- 5iO312-MISC-:-K. (Continued) �--- computerized and are serviced before problems develop; that the maintain- ance company which is a part of U.S. Wind Power handles European turbines; and that the company has a billion dollars in wind turbines and 100 million in working capital . He stated that the 277 turbines proposed will produce enough energy for 10,000 homes for 25,000 people; that wind energy saves thousands of barrelsof oil and reduces air pollution; that the proposed park has cut back density 20% and that the blades have a matte gray finish and a lattice tower which is less visible; that old turbines have been removed; and that the substation will be set back 1,000 ft. from the highway. He requested that the project not be set back 1/3 mile because the wind lessens at that distance; and that alternatives to the dike will be explored with perhaps a larger foundation for the turbines rather than construction of a dike. Commissioner Dotson asked if there are any agreements whereby U.S. Wind- power does not produce all the time because the power company does not want to buy the energy. Mr. Hoffman stated that there is no agreement like that in the San Gorgonio pass but there might have been in the Tehachipi area when Edison could not provide transmission access; that everything that U.S. Wind Power is producing is being purchased; and that the height at the tip of the blade at the 12:00 position is 110 ft. Commissioner Olsen asked if more time were needed by the Commission to review the project because of the issues raised. Planner suggested that the Commission take action and place their comments on record. Mr. Hoffman stated that U.S. Wind Power was not going to be on a County agenda probably until September. Commissioner Dotson suggested 1/4 mile setback as a comprise and asked if it would produce a significant difference visually. Planner stated that to have a significant effect the machines have to be moved away from the roadway and that the difference between 500 and 1000 feet visually is negligible. Commissioner Dotson stated that perhaps it might be a good trade-off. Planner stated that the BLM required a 1/3 mile setback on the project to the west. M/S/C (Hough/Dotson; Whitney/Mills/Edgmon; Lapham dissented) recommending the following to the County: 1. That the proposed Change of Zone for the northwest portion of the site not be approved due to the proximity to Interstate 10. May 24, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 22 MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS (Continued) CASE-5-.031-2-MISC.-16. (Continued) 2. That a setback not less than 1758 ft. (1/3 of a mile) from the outer southerly boundary of Interstate 10 right-of-way be required. 3. That alternative flood control mitigative measures, other than the proposed dike, be considered. DETERMINATION 10.370. Planning Commission determination that a small dry cleaning machine is an allowable use in a valet cleaning service facility in the CBD Zone. Planner (Evans) stated that the applicant went into business in the former Vineyard Center with valet service and one washer and one dryer; that the business has been successful and now the owner wants to give better service by adding a small dry cleaning facility; and that staff feels the request exceeds the intent of the determination. He stated that it will be a full service cleaning operation servicing the public and some hotels; that the dry cleaning equipment is self-contained and removal of chemicals would be by a licensed firm and hauled away; that the dry cleaning machine is the smallest that can be built; that hours of operation remain the same; that a small vehicle will be parked on site; and that if the Commission finds the proposal acceptable, staff will develop restrictions under a CUP so that it is not a full service facility. Tracy Gunneman, Economic Development Specialist, spoke on behalf of the owner and stated that the applicant is trying to find a suitable location other than the present site for a full service dry cleaning establishment; that the equipment is state of the art; that no other cleaners can put in the equipment unless it is purchased from the applicant; and that there will be no further expansion on the site. He stated that there would be no odor because the unit is sealed. Planning Director stated that not having an odor could be a condition. Commissioner Olsen commented that if there is a restaurant on the site, such as an outdoor cafe, there should/no odors. be Commissioner Dotson asked if the dry cleaning facility is currently allowed in the CBD Zone and suggested the issue be addressed generally in the CBD Zone. Planner replied that it is (Planning Director explained further that a limited dry cleaning facility is allowed as an accessory use in the CBD) . Chairman recommended that a Land Use Permit (LUP) be used so that the City can have control over the facility. He stated that there should be no odor or detriment to the site. M/S/C (Olsen/Hough; Whitney/Mills/Edgmon absent) determining that a small dry cleaning machine is an allowable use accessory in the CBD Zone subject to a Land Use Permit with the following conditions: 1. That no odor emenate from the facility. May 24, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 23 MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS (Continued) DETERMINATION 10.370. (Continued) 2. That only one dry cleaning machine is allowed. 3. That there be no detriment to the site because of the dry cleaning use. ADDED STARTERS. (Determination of eligibility for consideration.) - M/S/C (Olsen/Hough; Whitney/Mills/Edgmon absent) that an LUP for a one-day auction on May 28, 1989 at the Hilton Hotelis eligible for consideration as an added stater because the need for action arose after the agenda was pre- pared. LUP. Request by THE RING CO. for a one-day jewelry auction on May 28, 1989, at the Hilton Hotel (former Plaza Resort & Spa) on Tahquitz Way, C-1-AA Zone, Section 14. Planning Director stated that staff read about the auction but no applica- tion had been submitted; and that sales tax and business fee will be collected. M/S/C (Olsen/Hough; Whitney/Mills/Edgmon absent) approving a LUP for a one- day jewelry auction by The Ring Company on May 28 at the Hilton Hotel . CITY-COUNCIL-ACTIONS. Update of City Council actions. Case 3.0541 (Modular Home at 400 W. Mesquite, I .L.) . Council upheld Commission decision for a restudy. The Tribal Council wants the applicant to return the application to staff and to hire an architect. SB 11 (Cranston -Bill ) . City Resolution 16780 regarding Indian Canyons, open space and preservation. Staff will check into Council action. COMMISSION/STAFF REPORTS OR REQUESTS. Canyon Hotel Signing & Dead Landscaping. Planning Director stated that the manager turns the water on and off as staff reminds him but since the land is leased and Indian Land, little can be done. Tract Map & Packets. Commissioner Dotson requested that maps be included on agenda items in Commission packets. May 24, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 24 MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS (Continued) Press- --Rel ease--- on- the. -Airport. Commissioner Dotson asked i-if the airport could prepare a press release on the expansion plans. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Chairman adjourned' the meeting at 5:00 p.m. CANNING DIRECTOR MDR/ml PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES x Council Chamber, City Hall June 14, 1989 1:30 p.m. ROLL CALL F-Y 1988 - 1989 Present Present Excused Absences Planning Commission This Meeting to Date to Date Larry Lapham, Chairman X 21 2 Gary Olsen X 19 4 Barbara Whitney X 18 5 Brent Hough X 21 2 Martha Edgmon - 20 3 Chris Mills X 19 2 Michael Dotson X 20 0 Staff Present Marvin D. Roos, Planning Director Siegfried Siefkes, Assistant City Attorney Douglas Evans, Planner Debra Goodwin, Planner Dave Forcucci , Planner Sherri Abbas, Planner Mary E. Lawler, Recording Secretary Architectural Advisory Committee - June 12, 1989 Brent Hough, Chairman Will Kleindienst William Johnson Mike Buccino Tom Doczi Reuel Young Chairman called the meeting to order at 1:30 p.m. M S C (Olsen/Hough) a rovin minute of May 24 1� with the following / / approving Y � 9 corrections: Page 4, TTM 23928. Add: Mills abstained. Page 12, Case 5.0438-MISC. Delete Paragraph 5. Add "Commissioner Dotson asked the reasons for initiation of an environmental assessment at this point since it should have been done when the Master Plan and Noise Study were done." REPORT OF POSTING AGENDA: The June 14, 1989 agenda was available for public access at the City Hall exterior bulletin board and the Planning Division Counter by 5:00 p.m. , Friday, June 9, 1989.