Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1989/02/22 - MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES Council Chamber, City Hall February 22, 1989 1:30 p.m. ROLL CALL F-Y 1988 - 1989 Present Present Excused Absences Planning-Commission This Meeting to Date to Date Larry Lapham, Chairman X 14 2 Gary Olsen - 12 4 Barbara Whitney X 12 4 Brent Hough X 14 2 Martha Edgmon X 14 2 Chris Mills X 13 1 Michael Dotson X 13 0 S-ta-f f -P-res a-n t John Mangione, Director of Community Development Marvin D. Roos, Planning Director Siegfried Siefkes , Assistant City Attorney Debra Goodwin, Planner Sherri Abbas, Planner John Terell , Redevelopment Planner Douglas Evans , Planner Dean Lewis, Traffic Engineer Mary E. Lawler, Recording Secretary Are-hi teetural- -Advi-s-or-y-Comm-ittee - Tuesday, February 21, 1989 Brent Hough, Chairman Will Kleindienst William Johnson Reuel Young Tom Doczi Mike Buccino Chairman called the meeting to order at 1:30 p.m. M/S/C (Hough/Mills; Whitney absent) approving minutes of February 8, 1989 as submitted. ADMINISTRATIVE NOTE: There were no written Tribal Council comments or requests. REPORT OF POSTING AGENDA: The February 22, 1989 agenda was available for public access at the City Hall exterior bulletin board and the Planning Division Counter by 1:30 p.m. , Friday, February 17, 1989. February 22, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 2 CONSENT ACTION AGENDA Approval of architectural cases is valid for two years. The approval granted must be exercised within that time period unless extended. M/S/C (Edgmon/Hough; Olsen absent) taking the following actions: CAS E-.3:931- -(MI-NOR) . Application by H.M. TOUSSI for Commission reconsideration of restudy of light poles for Vin de France Restaurant in the Desert Fashion Plaza on North Palm Canyon Drive, PD-147, Section 15. Approved subject to the following conditions: 1. Three poles maximum. 2. Total wattage per pole shall not exceed 200 watts incandescent. GASE- -3 02-91. Application by SUNSPOT/KRAMER for architectural approval of revised elevations for a single-family residence on West Racquet Club Road between Cardillo/the mountains , R-1-C Zone, Section 3. Approved as submitted. CASE--30523--(-LOT--26) . Application by MCCARTHY/SANBORN for architectural approval of single-family residence at 1038 Andreas Palms Drive, R-1-B Zone, Section 35. Approved subject to the following conditions: 1. That the chimney detail be restudied (subject to staff approval ) . 2. That the landscape plans be restudied (subject to staff approval ) . 3. That all recommendations of the Development Committee be met. CASE--3:0524--(LOT, 24) . Application by MCCARTHY/SANBORN for architectural approval of single-family residence at 1040 Andreas Palms Drive, R-1-B Zone, Section 35. Approved subject to the following conditions: 1. That the roof tile be resubmitted. 2. That the chimney detail be restudied (subject to staff approval ) . i i I i I February 22, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 3 CONSENT AGENDA (Continued) CASE -3-:0524 (-L-O . 241. (Continued) -- 3. That the landscape plans be restudied (subject to staff approval ) . 4. That all recommendations of the Development Committee be met. 4-0 vote. CASE- 3 A1,31. Application by SONNY BONO for architectural approval of revised landscape plans for a rear entrance of a single-family residence at 294 Crestview Drive, R-1-C Zone, Section 27. Approved as submitted. CASE- -3.-0257--(MINOR). Application by THE GREENHOUSE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION for architectural approval of installation of security gates for Greenhouse Condominium complex on Alejo/Hermosa Drive, R-G-8 Zone, Section 14. Continued to March 8 for submittal of additional details of the fence and elevations . CASE- 60449--PD-191. Request by STEVEN CROWE for a 12-month time extension for a planned development district to construct a luxury hotel on South Palm Canyon Drive between Sunny Dunes Road/Mesquite Avenue, C-1 Zone, Section 23 (Ref. Case 5.0282-PD-150) . Approved twelve-month time extension subject to all original conditions of approval . The expiration date is January 3, 1990. TPM---2 012. Request by DENNIS MARTIN for a 12-month time extension for subdivi- sion of 192 condominiums on the corner of Racquet Club/Sunrise Way, PD-110, Section 2. Approved 12-month time extension subject to all original conditions of approval . The expiration date is February 18, 1990. GAS 3.0539--(-MI-NOR). Application by MARK PALMER & ASSOC. for architectural approval of an automatic teller machine for Security Pacific Bank, 588 S. Palm Canyon Drive, C-1 Zone, Section 22. Restudy. Relocation of the machines next to the Escrow office is recom- mended. February 22, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 4 CONSENT AGENDA (Continued) S-IGN. Application by SOMETHING PERSONAL HEALTH & FITNESS SPA HOTEL for architectural approval of a main identification sign, 814 N. Indian `�.. Avenue, R-3 Zone, Section 11. Restudy noting that the graphics should be reduced so that the copy is the dominant part of the sign and dropped to the left hand side of the copy; and that the sign be done in rectangular fashion and lineal with the hedges. ITEMS REMOVED FROM CONSENT ACTION AGENDA Approval of architectural cases is valid for two years. The approval granted must be exercised within that time period unless extended. CA&E---3 0473. Application by DAVID CHRISTIAN for architectural approval of revised site plan and revised elevations for a restaurant on Palm Canyon Drive between Mesquite Avenue/Sunny Dunes Road, W-C-1 Zone, Section 22. Planner (Abbas) stated that the woodsy character of the original elevations did not blend with Palm Canyon Drive and new elevations have been submitted which are more in keeping with the Palm Canyon look. She stated that the tiled roof resembles cedar shake, and that the lines on the elevation are probably caps. She stated that working drawings will delineate the lines. M/S/C (Edgmon/Dotson; Olsen absent) approving the application subject to ` the following conditions: 1. That the trash enclosure areas be restudied and the gates moved back. 2. That landscape should transition into the wash. 3. That color and material boards be submitted prior to issuance of building permits. 4. That textured paving be provided at the customer drop off area. 5. That exterior lighting and signing be approved prior to permit issuance. 6. That all recommendations of the Development Committee be met. 7. That all fascia wood memoers 'be glu-lam material . S-IGR- APPLI-C-ATION. Application by INTEGRATED SIGNS ASSOCIATES for architectural approval of new identification sign for the Security Pacific Bank (formerly City National Bank) , 588 South Palm Canyon Drive, C-1 Zone, Section 23. Chairman abstained; Vice-Chairman presided. February 22, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 5 ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA (Continued) S-I-GN -APP-LI-CATION. (Continued) Planning Director stated that the sign is in the same location as the previous one. Commissioner Hough explained that the Committee suggested that the tile be patched or removed and replaced with a constant compatible color before the letters are remounted . M/S/C (Mills/Dotson; Lapham abstained; Olsen absent) approving the appli- cation subject to the following condition: That the tile match the blue tile on the south elevations . CASE -85-.158 --Certi-fi cate--of Compl i ance{Lot -Li-ne -Ad-j-ustments). Application by FRANCIS MARKLEY for a Lot Line Adjustment/Certificate of Compliance for property on Camino Barcanca , R-1-B Zone, Section 27. Planning Director recommended continuance for staff to review recent information for completeness . M/S/C (Dotson/Hough; Olsen absent) continuing the application to March 8. CASE--5-i02-93-£UP. PLANNING COMMISSION review of a conditional use permit for Canyon Hotel allowing for public use of tennis club on north side of Murray Canyon Drive at Sierra Madre, R-2/0 Zones (I.L.) , Section 35. Planning Director explained that the Tribal Council has requested con- tinuance for review of the application. M/S/C (Hough/Edgmon; Olsen absent) continuing the application to March 8. ARCHITECTURAL APPROVAL ITEMS Approval of architectural cases is valid for two years . The approval granted must be exercised within that time period unless extended. CASE- -30452. Application by ROBERTSON-SMITH for architectural approval of retail/commercial/industrial complex on Gene Autry Trail , M-1 Zone, Section 19. (Returned to Commission from City Council meeting of February 15, 1989.) Planning Director explained that the Council appealed the application because of concern of overall site circulation, voted 3-2 to send it back for further study to the Commission to insure that there is complete and free access throughout the project; that the AAC reviewed the project on February 22, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 6 ARCHITECTURAL APPROVAL ITEMS (Continued) CASE-ja;0452. (Continued) February 21 and reiterated its previous approval ; that the Council feels that there is an issue of City policies not being strong enough; and that if the Commission reiterates its previous approval the applicant would be in a difficult position. Planner (Evans) stated that the City Council appeal was on whether or not the application was circumventing the process in that the roadway width is 38 ft. narrowing to 30 ft. and the typical roadway required is 50 ft. ; that the street ends in a substandard cul-de-sac; that the Fire Department feels that the turn around radius is acceptable; and that in the side parking areas fire trucks cannot make turns but they do not operate in a deadend situation so the fire fighters would fight fires from the main access roadway. He stated that there is a concern that if cars park illegally, they will block the driveway, and that the Fire Chief indicates that hose hookups have to be provided in the back, which is a common requirement. He stated the issue is whether or not a 30 ft. access road with no parking except bay parking is adequate or should be upgraded to be similar to a public street. Chairman asked if Council would accept a minimum standard for the street. Planner replied that a minimum standard would address concerns regarding access , but that the applicant would have to redesign the project which would be difficult. James Zeveley, 28710 B La Haciendas , Temecula, California, asked for approval on the project and stated that his position is that the project stands as it is; that the Fire Department indicates that sprinklers and hose boxes will mitigate any problems; that several concessions have been made; and the project is a good one. Commissioner Mills stated that he voted against the project originally but not because of the circulation problem; and that six feet will not make that much difference in the circulation pattern. M/S/C (Mills/Hough; Edgmon dissented; Olsen absent) approving the appli- cation as originally submitted and subject to the original conditions of approval . February 22, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 7 PUBLIC HEARINGS C,A-S€ -J 05O1--CUP-- (Conti nue-d). Application by BEN PERRY for a conditional use permit for lighted tennis court at 2441 Southridge Circle, R-1-B Zone, Section 25. (This action is categorically exempt from Environmental Assessment per CEQA guidelines.) Planner stated that the site was reviewed on a field trip by the AAC and Commission; that there are homeowners in opposition to the project because of their concern over light on the hillside and on their properties; that the Southridge Homeowners Association opposes the lighting; that staff after a thorough review recommends approval ; and that the AAC recommended approval of the court and denial of the lights. Chairman declared the hearing open. Chris Mills, 121 South Palm Canyon , project architect, stated that the applicant has approval letters from the immediate neighbors who would be most affected by the lighting; that Mr. Miller, one of the property owners who opposed the lighting is not close although his entry faces out into the tennis court (but not his view area); that the court is for a single-family residence with a minor amount of evening use; that the applicant is willing ``- to limit the hours of play to 9:00 or 8:00 if necessary; that the court is on a separate lot where a single-family residence could be built which would produce more light; that the source of the light could be hidden; that the fence could be 10 ft. in height with the lights mounted at that height; and that netting would shield the lights. He stated that a CUP is viewed on an individual basis; and that no precedent will be set if the lighting is approved. There being no further appearances; Chairman declared the hearing closed. Commissioner Whitney stated that she felt personally that the light against the mountain would be attractive; that the Miller house is oriented away from the court and not affected by the lights; that approval would not set a precedent because each situation will be reviewed on its own merits; and that the fence should be ten feet with the lights on top. Commissioner Hough stated that he did not change his opposition to the lighting application after the field trip; that he was surprised that the view corridor extended so far west (almost to the Palm Springs Mall ); and that the applicants are cooperative and would restrict hours of usage but because of the site' s prominence on the mountain, many people will see it even if the neighbors are not especially affected. Planning Director recommended that two votes be taken by the Commission; one on the court and one on the lighting. M/S/C (Edgmon/Hough; Mills abstained; Olsen absent) approving the tennis court based on the following findings: February 22, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 8 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) CASE- - 050 --CUP. (Continued) 1. That the recreation type use is acceptable for the development of the community, and is in harmony with the various elements of the General Plan, but would extend a noise factor into the evening hours. 2. That the site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the tennis court. 3. That the proposed use should not generate any traffic in addition to that expected for the main house and should not affect the local street system. 4. That due to the hillside condition of the site, the requirement of a six (6) foot wall between the tennis court and adjacent property is not necessary. Motion was made by Whitney, seconded by Lapham; to approve the tennis court lighting with the lights to be on a 10 ft. high fence and hidden by netting. The vote was as follows: Ayes: Lapham, Whitney Noes: Hough, Edgmon, Dotson Abstention: Mills Absent: Olsen The motion for approval failed , and lighting for the tennis court was denied. TPM --237-56/,CASE -6:366-VARIANCE- (Con-ti need). Application by THE HOLT GROUP for a tentative parcel map to allow a four lot subdivision and a variance for minimum lot dimensions and lot area at the west end of Camino Alturas/Camino Monte, R-1-B Zone, Section 27. (Commission response to written comments on draft Negative Declaration; no comments received; action.) Planner (Abbas) stated that there was concern at the AAC regarding access to the parcels, particularly those at the bottom of the site; and that the committee felt that the proposed driveway would create a berm and would be inappropriate. She stated that the AAC recommended a restudy for further alternatives to be explored for access to the lower parcels. Chairman declared the hearing open. John Rupe, Newport Land & Development Company, project applicant, stated that much study had been done of the site by his engineering firm; that preliminary discussion with the Commission and the Engineering Division resulted in the proposal for approval of the subdivision with some modifi- cation because of the installation of the cul-de-sac at the end of Alturas; February 22, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 9 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) EASE0501WCU-P. (Continued) that the project will be good for the adjacent properties and the area; that the property owners want the subdivision; that the project meets the overall acreage requirement; that the site is interesting and difficult but the product will be good; that each pad will be designed individually; that the size of the lots exceeds 83% of the lot sizes in the area; that the AAC's major concern was the roadway to the southeast element because of the 6-8 ft. fill but that the depression of the site has to be spanned for utility installation in the manner it has been done; that every effort will be made to reduce the roadway fill ; and that staff is to be complimented on their help. Gary Pike, The Holt Group, 275 E1 Cielo, project engineer, stated that the driveway concern of the AAC has been addressed; that parcel 2 or 3 could be used for the driveway but that trees may have to be removed on the east side of the property if the driveway is moved and would require 4 to 5 feet of fill at the maximum point close to the property line which would require a retaining wall ; and that if the driveway were put on the east side, 180 ft. of lateral sewer pipe for Parcel 4 would be required and 1/3 of the water retention area would be lost. He stated that the driveway would be more acceptable to the neighbors in the middle of the project; that there are 2 feet to spare vertically in the driveway location; and that the driveway could be lowered and still allow room for sewerage. He asked that the Commission approve the project and reduce the driveway 2 feet at the midpoint. `�.. There being no further appearances; Chairman declared the hearing closed. Commissioner Mills stated that he could see why only two lots were in the original subdivision because of the slope, although three might be viable; that if there were three lots , access to the east portion should be moved; that he had concerns about the driveway to lot 4 coming off the existing access; that a joint easement could be made and the high driveway treated architecturally; that the cul-de-sac is not in character with the old Mesa area unless the entire area were redone (which is not acceptable); and that if approved the CC&R's should state that the houses require City approval because the houses must be special to integrate with the lots since no one should submit an application based on the footprints. He stated that he did not like the way the footprints were configured. Commissioner Hough stated that three lots would be acceptable but that four do not fit the topography; and that a full cul-de-sac is not necessary unless the entire area were redone. Commissioner Whitney stated that she did not want to review the property based on comparisons to the other lots; that much of the Mesa was built without guidelines; that two houses on the site would be best and they should be wonderful since the property is special ; and that she did not want a cul-de-sac; and that site concerns are a problem. Chairman stated that three lots would possibly be the best with the stipulation that no lot would be graded until there is an approval of a house, access , landscaping and cut and fill . He stated that the sites February 22, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 10 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) CASE-50501WGUP. (Continued) should not be carved out now to sell the lots and that a talented architect could design a magnificent house on the rugged terrain with little impact on the lots . M/S/C (Hough/Dotson; Olsen absent) restudying the application noting con- cerns of the Commission and the AAC. GASE---5-:OS03-£U-P. Application by GREGORY/PIO PARTNERSHIP for a conditional use permit for a day care center on the northwest corner of Gene Autry Trail/Chia Road/Via Roberto Miguel , W-R-1-C Zone, Section 7. (Commission response to written comments on draft Negative Declaration; no comments received; action .) Planner (Terell ) explained the project on the display board and stated that the AAC suggestions regarding the restudy of the parking lot for cir- culation will reduce a number of parking stalls; that the AAC recommended approval of the elevations; and that there is an additional condition that a lot line adjustment be submitted to combine the parcels. In reply to Commissioner Whitney, he stated that the play yard is toward Gene Autry and the building sits between the adjacent single-family resi- dences and the play area, and that the children would get out ' emer- gencies through two exits that do not access Gene Autry. He tated that one suggestion regarding the trash enclosure is to extend the 6 ft. wall 25 ft. into the setback to match the fence on the adjacent single-family lot. He stated that on-site circulation to handle peak flows in the morning and evening which might affect the neighboring properties was an AAC concern since the Chia driveway does not meet Traffic Engineering standards. Commissioner Dotson asked about the intersection at Gene Autry. Traffic Engineer stated that this intersection is for right turns only and that Gene Autry will be upgraded in lane number with a median island. Chairman stated that traffic will not circulate through the residential neighborhood. Commissioner Hough noted that the children do not all arrive at the same time. Commissioner Mills stated that the mechanical equipment area is not large enough. Planner stated that the mechanical equipment is enclosed behind the para- pet. February 22, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 11 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) CASE -5 0503-GUP. (Continued) `.� Robert Ricciardi , Prickly Pear Lane, Palm Desert, project architect, stated that the project has been studied with staff and will be a large day care center; that the area for the children was chosen to not impact the residential properties; that Gene Autry is a main circulation street which will handle traffic; that the circulation on-site will be improved by AAC comments; that City parking standards are met and the building sprinklered; and that the children would go into the parking lot in case of a fire. He explained the location of the mechanical equipment and stated that heat pumps may be explored since the building is daytime use only. He also stated that the project will enhance the City. There being no further appearances; Chairman declared the hearing closed. In reply to Commissioner Mill 's question, Planner stated that the 6 ft. wall on Gene Autry is 5 ft. from the property line. M/S/C (Hough/Edgmon; Dotson abstained; Mills dissented; Olsen absent) approving the application based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions. F i_nd to gs 1. That the Zoning Ordinance authorizes the consideration of day care facilities under a C .U.P. in any zone, subject to approval by both the Planning Commission and City Council . 2. That day care centers are necessary within the community and are in harmony with the General Plan. 3. That the proposed facility is not detrimental to existing or proposed uses in the zone. 4. That the 41,000 sq. ft. site is adequate in size and shape to accom- modate the proposed use, including parking, circulation, play areas, and the like necessary to fit the use on the site. 5. That the project design could be easily altered for residential use in case the use as a day care center ceases to exist. 6. That the site is served by Gene Autry Trail , Chia Road, and Via Roberto Miguel , which have the capacity to service the proposed use. Gondi t-i ons : 1. That the proposed development shall conform to all applicable regula- tions of the Palm Springs Zoning Ordinances , Municipal Code, or any other City codes and resolutions which supplement the zoning district regulations. 2. That landscape plans shall be approved by the Riverside County Agricultural Commissioner' s Office prior to submittal . February 22, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 12 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) CASE 5:0503-CUP. (Continued) `e•.� 3. That the property owner shall provide the City with a covenant which commits the property owner and successors in interest to landscaping and maintenance of a median island adjoining the subject property. The covenant shall also commit the property owners to join a future assessment district to design, install , and maintain the subject median island. 4. That all loading and unloading of children will occur on-site. 5. That all County and State licensing procedures shall be met. 6. That all mechanical equipment shall be screened from view. 7. That the interior drives shall be designated as "one way" . 8. That all playground equipment over six feet in height shall be out- side the setback area. 9. That all signs shall be approved under a separate application. 10. That existing Southern California Edison easements, which are shown on the Preliminary Title Report as passing under the proposed structure , shall be removed or relocated prior to issuance of a building permit by the City. �- 11. That location for trash enclosure is recommended to be moved to the north side of the entry drive. 12. That the parking space south of the entry drive is recommended to be removed to allow for the radiussing of the adjacent planter area to allow for improved one-way circulation on the site. 13. That credit shall be given toward the required project parking for on-site drop-off and stacking spaces due to the short-term nature of the parking demand for the project. Where such spaces block access to standard parking spaces , said standard spaces shall be reserved for staff parking. 14. That the parking lot design shall be revised to comply with the pro- vision of Section 9306E of the Zoning Ordinance, specifically the size of planter areas. 15. That the six foot wall along the north property line shall be extended to the 25 foot setback line for Via Roberto Miguel . The foot wall along Via Roberto Miguel shall be extended to meet the six foot wall at the setback line. 16. That the site plan is approved. 17. That the parking lot be restudied. February 22, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 13 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) CASE .5­�­050-3-CUP. (Continued) �- 18. That That all recommendations of the Development Committee of February 16, 1989 be met. 19. That the lots in question be combined into a single parcel . NOTE: Commissioner Mills dissented because of the architecture. C-ASE- -5:-0504-P-D-199. Application by M.H. SHASHANI for a planned development district to allow construction of a 66-unit apartment complex with density bonus on North Indian Avenue between San Raphael Road/Simms Road, R-2 Zone, Section 2. (Commission response to written comments on draft Negative Declaration; no comments received; action.) Planner (Abbas) gave the staff report and stated that the applicant can build 55 units by right of zone and is requesting a density bonus for an additional 11 units which will be low to moderate income housing. She stated that the AAC recommended restudy of the orientation to outdoor living, to the wind factor, and in materials and colors. In reply to Commissioners' question , she stated that the patio areas are recessed and that the recreation room would have solar panels for pool heating. Chairman declared the hearing open. George Theodoro, 8331 Unica Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga , the applicant, stated that the project evolved from the 20% density increase and the wish to use an existing cluster plan that had been successful ; that the long clusters can be reoriented inward; that the village look has been achieved by angling the clusters; that moving the laundry facility toward the recrea- tional facilities is no problem; that the childcare play box should be located where it is to keep noise away from the pool ; that the concrete tile is dark in color; and that the building colors can be changed to desert colors. He stated that the decks all have full overhangs; that the site has been used efficiently in light of the density factors; that 20% of the units will be low income housing; that some open space has been sacrificed although it meets City standards. Chairman explained that low income housing mix is determined by Riverside County. Commissioner Dotson stated that there should be an appropriate mix of affordable housing throughout the project. Homan Sharrif, Palm Village Development, the applicant, stated that the concept has been successful in the past; that every building shows from a different angle; that the village concept seemed to be receptive to staff; that there are amenities such as security gating, a recreation room, a February 22, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 14 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) CASE -S 0504,--PD-199. (Continued) pool , and an exercise room; that the laundry facility should be away from the recreation room for noise mitigation; that each unit has a hook up for a washer and dryer; that the buildings can be reorientated on the site; that density caused the buildings to be closer together; that buildings that are too close become a negative factor; and that the density increase is an obligation and the 20% is spread throughout the units. R. A. Griffin, 300 Molino Road, nearby property owner, stated that his pro- ject was envisioned originally as a show place; that it is not a family neighborhood and attracts artists and musicians , seniors and young profes- sionals and is devoid of children; that development of the property is understood; that the affordable project to the south has a negative impact upon the neighborhood through crime, noise and abandoned vehicles; that the density will reflect the type of development and impact the unique homes in the area; that the intersection of San Rafael and Indian is an uncontroll- able one with one or two accidents a week; that the impact on traffic should be considered; that the 150 ft. abutment between the R-1 and R-2 Zone should not be shortened; and requested that sight poles be erected to determine view blockage. Ken Fishong, 3133 Sunny View Drive, abutting property owner, stated that he has spent $60,000 restoring his home; that there are many problems in the project to the south; that a density increase should not be allowed; that the project should sell at market value; and that no view of the mountains should be blocked. Manja Rockis , 290 Simms Road, stated that she agreed with previous state- ments and that she opposed the increase in traffic , noise and the loss of privacy. She stated that crime would increase and has increased since the housing project on the south was built. There being no further appearances; Chairman declared the hearing closed. Chairman asked if 25% density bonus was a City obligation if an applicant requested it. Assistant City Attorney stated that it is not an obligation but is some- thing that can be done by a City under certain circumstances. Planning Director stated that the City has the ability to offer other incentives in lieu of density bonuses by State Law. George Theodoro (rebuttal ) stated that a sight line analysis has been pre- pared for the closest house to the project and on the two story structures and the impact will not be great; that one story structures will have the same impact on the view because at some point a portion will be blocked; that City guidelines have been met on the two story units; that the project is well designed and has amenities and will be managed by the development company; and that there is control of junk cars because of fencing and gating. February 22, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 15 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) CASE-5�fl5-04--PD-.1.99. (Continued) Chairman stated that the site plan needs a total restudy and that eleva- tions are very rigid and ordinary. In response to Commissioner Edgmon' s question , Traffic Engineer stated that the traffic signal will be placed in 1990 or 1991 at San Rafael and Indian and has a high priority. Commissioner Edgmon suggested that the rear elevations on Indian Avenue be restudied. Commissioner Mills suggested an entry corridor to create a self-policing situation so that neighbors know each other. He recommended reorientation of the buildings and stated that the two story buildings impact the single- family residences at the initial build out of the project; and that an eight foot tree or hedge height is not unreasonable for the neighborhood, and could be placed at the east property line which would block out the two story buildings . He stated that he had concerns about the site plan; and that the building elevations are not appropriate for the desert, nor are materials, nor the aesthetics of the project. Commissioner Dotson agreed with the comments of the Commission and the AAC recommendations. M/S/C (Dotson/Mills; Olsen absent; Whitney abstained) for a restudy noting AAC guidelines as follows: 1. That the site plan must address outdoor living. 2. That the plan must be sensitive to outdoor living. 3. That landscaping materials be re-evaluated. 4. That elevations and orientation of buildings be restudied. 5. That the materials more desert-oriented. 6. That the site plan should respond to the wind factor. 7. That proximity of parking to buildings be re-evaluated. CASE- -5- 0-506-(IRA. Initiation by the CITY OF PALM SPRINGS of an amendment to the General Plan for a Master Plan of Signals citywide. (Commission response to written comments on draft Negative Declaration; no comments received; action.) Recommendation: That the Commission order the filing of a Negative Declaration and approve GPA 5.0506. February 22, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 16 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) CAS 5 0­5-06-GPA. (Continued) Planning Director stated that staff and Councilman Foster reviewed the needs and expectations for traffic signals in the JHK Circulation Study and 43 signals will be needed and one additional signal at Horizon Trailer Park and East Palm Canyon Drive. Traffic Engineer stated that most of the signals are future installations, but there are some signals that are scheduled within the next four years, i .e. , Tachevah/Sunrise; Indian/San Rafael ; and two intersections will have signal modifications , i .e. , Farrell/Vista Chino and Tahquitz/Caballeros. Planning Director explained that as part of the CVAG overall study and once locations of the signals are established, a transportation mitigation fee will be developed. Commissioner Dotson asked the accuracy of the JHK Study. Traffic Engineer replied that some parts are accurate and some are not since some of the traffic numbers forecast for the year 2010 have already been reached. In response to Commissioner Mills question, he stated that the modifications to the two signals include left turns. Planning Director stated that the JHK Study can be updated and that the permissive signalization used at Farrell and Tahquitz for left turns resulted in several accidents and is no longer used. In reply to Commissioner Edgmon' s question, Traffic Engineer stated that there would be a protective left turn movement at Farrell and Vista Chino; and that presently it sometimes takes three or more turns to move through the intersection in the mornings. Chairman declared the hearing open; there being no appearances , the hearing was closed. M/S/C (Hough/Edgmon; Olsen absent) approving GPA 5.0506 establishing a master plan of signals city-wide based on the following finding: That the improvements proposed in the transportation system will benefit all seg- ments of the community. PUBLIC COMMENTS: None. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS CASE 20103. Request by RIVERSIDE COUNTY for Planning Commission review of TPM 22632 for Palm Drive Associates at the corner of Interstate 10/Palm Drive, Sphere of Influence. Planner (Evans) stated that a change occurred at the Board of Supervisors level because the applicant asked for a Change of Zone from an industrial February 22, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 17 MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS (Continued) CASE- 20 1.03. (Continued) �- park for the bulk of the project to Manufacturing/Services/Commercial ; that staff recommended against the change because it allows outdoor storage which the County has not addressed; that an example of M-S-C Zoning is in the area around Sossa's Market on Ramon where is a chain fence, dying plants, and junk accummulation. He stated that staff addressed the Board of Supervisors and recommended that the MSC Zoning classification not be approved. He stated that the industrial park proposal should be supported i by the Commission. i In reply to Commission question , he stated that the entry road into the project would access to the raceway. M/S/C (Edgmon/Whitney; Dotson abstained; Olsen absent) recommending to the Board of Supervisors that it deny the Manufacturing/Services/Commercial zoning classification at the corner of I-10 and Palm Drive. CAS,E­ 20.1-08. PLANNING COMMISSION review of draft EIR and design concept for auto raceway on I-10 north of the City limits, Sphere of Influence. Planning Director stated that the Commission should review the overall concept of the raceway, the relationship of the environmental issues , and the overall issue relating to the City and the region. Planner (Evans) stated that the project is between Indian and Gene Autry Trail and has access through the subdivision just reviewed (Case 20.103); that there is a frontage road, and an activity center with a hotel , office facilities, a museum and exhibit building and garage; and that the garage area requires a zone change and the raceway requires a CUP. He stated that there are five phases of development: 1. The raceway. 2. The hotel . 3. The office building. 4. The garage. 5. The exhibits and museum complex. He explained further that the raceway is now centered on the site to balance uses and circulation; that several types of racing will be pro- moted; that there will be 35,000 bleacher seats; that there will be a drainage area; that there will be seating on the berm, which screens the raceway from I-10; and that mitigation measures for Caltrans is a second entrance off Indian Avenue. He explained that a sign advertising the race- way will be 45 to 60 ft. high, which could be scaled down and still attract a driver's attention; that the grandstand will have a solid base for noise buffering; and the raceway will be depressed on the property. He explained the benefits would be the creation of a major spectator facility with fall and winter seasons (no springs or summer major events); that money will be brought to the area; and that there will be spin off businesses such as testing facilities . He asked that the Commission state its concerns; that staff had met with the applicant on City concerns; that government agency February 22, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 18 MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS (Continued) CASE 20108. (Continued) comments are directly to the point regarding solving of transportation and circulation problems; and that the issues are broad now but will get more specific regarding mitigation as the project gets closer to development. He stated that noise is one of the most difficult to address and more information has been requested by staff; that the project will be audible in the City but the intensity has not been determined; that one of the issues is the inability to mitigate noise impacts on the houses around the track; that there is no information yet on the impact on the citizens in the northern area of Palm Springs; that flood control issues will be reviewed by County Flood Control ; that air quality mitigation issues are included in the EIR; that on-site traffic circulation will be efficiently handled according to the document; and that traffic signals will be set to move traffic as far away as Riverside. He stated that 50,000 people will be attending races in several years and that daily traffic will be 5,000 cars a day and on a peak race day 37,000 cars will be at the track. He stated that major races will occur 5 to 8 times a year; that standard types of improvements will handle the traffic such as signal modifications; and that Caltrans reviews freeway access on major events. He requested Commission concerns to take to the County Planning Commission meeting on March 8, and stated that the Board of Supervisors will not review the project until summer. Director of Community Development stated that from a Council perspective the project fits into the Council concept of adult recreation opportunities in the valley such as the proposed golf course/horse track/amphitheater (Palm Springs Classic); that a presentation was made by Jim Gutherie, the developer, to the Council which was receptive to the raceway; that the County has criticized Palm Springs for lack of input; that the City commented on the Draft EIR; that the concept is good, the site works well , and the access is good from the freeway; and that the race track is close to the City to attract people to the hotels for race weekends. He stated that part of the mitigative measures discussed by the developer are development of transportation systems from hotels to the raceway; package promotions of hotels and the raceway to which the Council is receptive; that the Council has concerns on the environmental issues, especially noise, but the effect will not be known until the raceway is in operation. He stated that a noise contour is difficult to interpret although the 45 decibel level is conversational range; and that the air quality issue is difficult but that the trade off is that part of the time the area will be reserved open space and will have a low intensity use 300 days of the year. He stated that there is a six month racing season and competition for major events so there will not be many major events in the first years; and that special events such as testing and car clubs will be using the facility. He stated that Gene Autry Trail and Indian Avenue will function well for traffic; that Indian will be a four lane roadway; that Gene Autry will become a link of the Mid-Valley Parkway; and that the one-half cent sales tax will fund the Mid-Valley Parkway which will be a 6 lane thoroughfare with a bridge over the Whitewater River. He stated in regard to air quality that the City has asked for on-site activity so people will not all leave at the same time, and also people will probably stagger exiting any- way; that most of the raceway will empty within two hours; and that the '� tradeoff is the long term overall impact for the few days of use which is February 22, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 19 MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS (Continued) CASE -20 -108. (Continued) over ridden by the days the property is used minimumally. He stated that there will be no benefits to the City from an industrial park. Chairman asked if the developers realize that they will be annexed. Director of Community Development stated that the developers understand this but they had begun the process through the County and didyna-t want to start over. Charles Brown, 647 Main Street, Riverside, project architect, stated that Palm Springs was chosen as a site for the raceway because it has all the facilities such as restaurants, hotels, and good weather; and that the project is a major financial commitment. He stated that the owner has been in racing since the 50's; that the plot plan has been revised and berming added to reduce noise impacts and to deflect the sound upwards; that the sound level will be 45 decibels (although he is not an authority); that there are no renderings of the project at present (only rough sketches) but that renderings will be ready for the March 8 County Planning Commission Meeting. He stated that parking and traffic have been addressed; that traffic will be controlled at a control point so that cars can be released on a staggered basis; that Salvia Road will be widened to four lanes and traffic signals installed at Gene Autry and Salvia; that there will be no races on a major holiday; and that racing days will be coordinated with the City of Palm Springs . He stated that shuttle buses will be provided and coordinated with hotels; that the parking lot is developed from Caltrans •.•' guidelines; and that there will be free parking. Commissioner Lapham left the meeting indicating he wished to place his vote for approval feeling the positive benefits of the project override the unmitigated negative impacts identified thus far. Mr. Brown stated that the parking lot will open early for people to come early and there will be a park and ride lot; that race days will be during the winter months; that noise monitored by the Southern California Racing Association; that if problems occur the berming may be modified; that some types of races may not be held because of the noise; and that additional noise studies will be prepared on impacts to Palm Springs. Chairman returned to the meeting and stated that he had a 4:30 p.m. appointment but understood that there might be a tie vote on the Commission; and that he wished to say he was 100% for the project. Mr. Brown continued and showed the sketches on the display board that depicted sky boxes, the control room, hospitality boxes , the main entrance and the hotel . He stated that the facility will have a major auto sponsor and will be used for research, design and testing; and that this type of activity is the major source of revenue; that a major race gives credibi- lity to the track for testing and is needed for the name; and that more races may be able to be scheduled because of the fantastic location of the track (although races are scheduled years in advance) . February 22, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 20 MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS (Continued) CASE—20.wl-08. (Continued) 4 In answer to Commissioner Whitney' s question about the amount of downtime, Mr. Brown stated that a major auto manufacturer or testing company can rent the track for a full day probably using three cars; and that no one else can use the track because of the danger and for insurance reasons. He stated that other types of training could be done such as police officer vehicular training, schooling for race drivers , and tire testing. Planner (Evans) stated that the Commission should review the EIR; that there will be six to eight major races and some minor racing events during the year; that attendance will range from 5,000 to 20,000 people; that the major racing season would be between September and March; that an outdoor concert each year could be held possibly under a County permit and maybe during Easter Week. Commissioner Edgmon asked about the impact on I-10 for major events since it is heavily used now. She asked how exiting problems could be mitigated. Mr. Brown stated that cars will be controlled from a control tower and staggered as they leave the raceway and that numbers will be stated in the EIR, but that the consultant says there will not be a problem in monitoring the flow. He stated that portable signing will be used to direct traffic and that Caltrans will be monitoring east and west traffic; and that according to the consultant half of the traffic would be coming in from the east (Arizona) . �— Commissioner Hough commented that 50% of the traffic could be from the west on Saturdays when people have Sundays off. He suggested controlling the end of the races so that the traffic is out of the raceway before tourists start leaving Palm Springs. Mr. Brown stated that on-site programs could be provided inside after events, but attendance is uncertain because people like to get home after watching the races. Commissioner Hough commented that when he attended races in Ontario he was back in Palm Springs in two hours. Mr. Brown explained that there would not be major races in the beginning because of staff training and tactical development. He stated that mitiga- tive measures for noise in regard to the Fringe-Toed Lizard will be addressed. Commissioner Mills commented that traffic slowed but did not come to a stop when the Riverside Raceway let out. He stated that the main issue is noise for the average resident although probably it will be no noisier than aircraft departures; and that the Commission has to determine whether or not the use is desirable because it will definitely be high profile. Commissioner Whitney stated that the noise will add to the overall noise of the City and will affect air quality; and that she was not sure if the raceway should be at the entry to the City. i February 22, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 21 MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS (Continued) CASE-20108. (Continued) Mr. Brown stated that the lots at the entry are industrial and will be built to County standards and the view of the raceway will be a desert landscape berm with one major sign, a hotel , and a museum; and that the frontage is 1.5 miles of freeway. He stated that it would be hidden and have a cleaner appearance than a row of small stores without landscaping. Commissioner Mills commented that the site has a hill on it; that the race- way tucks behind it making the track invisible going east; that the knoll will break the wind; and that the project is sited well . Commissioner Edgmon commented that a raceway would hurt the image of Palm Springs. Mr. Brown asked if 'Commissioners were alluding to Riverside Raceway which was an ugly facility. He stated that other race tracks are nice. He cir- culated pictures of other tracks. Planning Director stated that the Commission has not seen all the impacts and the scope; that mitigative measures will come later; and that the Commission should give direction to the Council on the land use perspective and the mitigative measures for the impacts. Commissioner Hough stated that the raceway will be a good source of income which will only have 6 to 8 races a year. Planning Director stated that staff has been reviewing berming and sound ` .. mitigation as a key element of the design , including the track turn. Commissioner Mills stated that the parking lot on the west and its relationship to the hillside area should be addressed. Commissioner Whitney commented that she appreciated the answers of the applicant, but that she was concerned about the idea of a raceway and noise and air quality. She stated that she did not want a trade-off for dollars because the quality of life in Palm Springs is more important. Commissioner Edgmon agreed. M/S/C (Mills/Hough; Dotson abstained; Whitney/Edgmon dissented; Olsen absent) approving the raceway concept. GI-TY-COUNCIL -ACTIONS. Update of City Council actions. Case 5- 0500-CZ- (Airport Re-zoning). Council upheld rezoning of the airport land but the parcels are now all M-1-P. The cul-de-sac was kept. Cas-e 5.0400-GTA (C-1- Use -Changes). Second reading by Council . Ca-se- 3 0452- (Robertson/Smith- Commerci a1 Complex) . Sent back to the Commis- sion for further review of on-site circulation. r' February 22, 1989 PC MINUTES Page 22 MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS (Continued) Case. 3,:04.5.2_ �-Robertson/.Smi-th Commercial_-Complex) . (Continued) - Plann-ing--Commissi-over'-s ,Confe-ren-ce i.n- -Monterey_._in Apr-i-l . Commissioners are to advise staff if they want to attend. COMMI"SS10N/-STAFF REPORTS OR REQUESTS. Pl-exi-gla-ss - Signs. Commissioner Edgmon requested that the concept of plexi-glass signs be discussed at a study session. Hi-l-l-side L-i2hti-ng. Request by Commissioner Dotson to be a discussion item on future study session agenda. Planning Director stated that a City van could be obtained and a nighttime field trip taken to see night lights against the hillside. AD-DE-D.-STARTERS. (Determination of eligibility for consideration. ) None. ADJOURNMENT .,, There being no further business, Chairman adjourned the meeting at 5:00 p.m. PLA I ECT R MDR/ml 77 a � • PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES Council Chamber, City Hall March 8, 1989 1:30 p.m. ROLL CALL F-Y 1988 - 1989 Present Present Excused Absences Planning Commission This Meeting to Date to- Date Larry Lapham, Chairman X 15 2 Gary Olsen X 13 4 Barbara Whitney X 13 4 Brent Hough X 15 2 Martha Edgmon X 15 2 Chris Mills X 14 1 Michael Dotson X 14 0 Staff Present Marvin D. Roos, Planning Director Siegfried Siefkes , Assistant City Attorney Debra Goodwin , Planner !, Sherri Abbas, Planner Dave Forcucci , Zoning Enforcement Ken Feenstra , Economic Development Director Mary E. Lawler, Recording Secretary Architectural Advisory Committee - March 6, 1989 Brent Hough, Chairman Will Kleindienst William Johnson Reuel Young Tom Doczi Mike Buccino �µJ Chairman called the meeting to order at 1:30 p.m. M/S/C (Hough/Olsen) approving minuteA` of February 22, 1.989 with the following corrections: Page 16, paragraph 7: Change "turns" to"�'sal cycl„e ,'.' "'(Case 5 .0506-GPA) . Page 17, paragraph 1: Change "Ramon" to "Vista Chino" . (Case 20.103) Page 18, paragraph 1: Change "5,000 cars" to "2,500 trips" . (Case 20.108) REPORT OF POSTING AGENDA: The March 8, 1989 agenda was available for public access at the City Hall exterior bulletin board and the Planning Division Counter by 1:30 p.m. , Friday, March 3, 1989. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES Council Chamber, City Hall February 22, 1989 1:30 p.m. ROLL CALL F-Y 1988 - 1989 Present Present Excused Absences Planning-Commission This Meeting to Date to Date Larry Lapham, Chairman X 14 2 Gary Olsen - 12 4 Barbara Whitney X 12 4 Brent Hough X 14 2 Martha Edgmon X 14 2 Chris Mills X 13 1 Michael Dotson X 13 0 S-ta-f f -P-res a-n t John Mangione, Director of Community Development Marvin D. Roos, Planning Director Siegfried Siefkes , Assistant City Attorney Debra Goodwin, Planner Sherri Abbas, Planner John Terell , Redevelopment Planner Douglas Evans , Planner Dean Lewis, Traffic Engineer Mary E. Lawler, Recording Secretary Are-hi teetural- -Advi-s-or-y-Comm-ittee - Tuesday, February 21, 1989 Brent Hough, Chairman Will Kleindienst William Johnson Reuel Young Tom Doczi Mike Buccino Chairman called the meeting to order at 1:30 p.m. M/S/C (Hough/Mills; Whitney absent) approving minutes of February 8, 1989 as submitted. ADMINISTRATIVE NOTE: There were no written Tribal Council comments or requests. REPORT OF POSTING AGENDA: The February 22, 1989 agenda was available for public access at the City Hall exterior bulletin board and the Planning Division Counter by 1:30 p.m. , Friday, February 17, 1989.